This article is about one of the threeEuropean Communities that existed from 1958 until 2009 and was renamed European Community in 1993. Not to be confused with the present-dayEuropean Union, which incorporated the European Communities in 1993.
¹ The information in this infobox covers the EEC's time as an independent organisation. It does not give details of post-1993 operation within the EU as that is explained in greater length in theEuropean Union andEuropean Communities articles. ²De facto only, these cities hosted the main institutions but were not titled as capitals.
TheEuropean Economic Community (EEC) was aregional organisation created by theTreaty of Rome of 1957,[note 1] aiming to fostereconomic integration among its member states. It was subsequently renamed theEuropean Community (EC) upon becoming integrated into thefirst pillar of the newly formedEuropean Union (EU) in 1993. In the popular language, the singularEuropean Community was sometimes inaccurately used in the wider sense of the pluralEuropean Communities, in spite of the latter designation covering all the three constituent entities of the first pillar.[2] The EEC was also known as theEuropean Common Market (ECM) in the English-speaking countries,[3] and sometimes referred to as the European Community even before it was officially renamed as such in 1993. In 2009, the EC formally ceased to exist and its institutions were directly absorbed by the EU. This made the Union the formal successor institution of the Community.
Upon the entry into force of theMaastricht Treaty in 1993, the EEC was renamed the European Community to reflect that it covered a wider range than economic policy.[4] This was also when the three European Communities, including the EC, were collectively made to constitute the first of thethree pillars of the European Union, which the treaty also founded. The EC existed in this form until it was abolished by the 2009Treaty of Lisbon, which incorporated the EC's institutions into the EU's wider framework and provided that the EU would "replace and succeed the European Community".[5]
With the aim of creating afederal Europe two further communities were proposed: aEuropean Defence Community and aEuropean Political Community. While the treaty for the latter was being drawn up by theCommon Assembly, the ECSC parliamentary chamber, the proposed defence community was rejected by theFrench Parliament. ECSC PresidentJean Monnet, a leading figure behind the communities, resigned from the High Authority in protest and began work on alternative communities, based on economic integration rather than political integration.[6] Following theMessina Conference in 1955,Paul-Henri Spaak was given the task to prepare a report on the idea of acustoms union. The so-calledSpaak Report of theSpaak Committee formed the cornerstone of the intergovernmental negotiations at Val Duchesse conference centre in 1956.[7] Together with theOhlin Report the Spaak Report would provide the basis for theTreaty of Rome.
The resulting communities were the European Economic Community (EEC) and theEuropean Atomic Energy Community (EURATOM or sometimes EAEC). These were markedly less supranational than the previous communities,[citation needed] due to protests from some countries that theirsovereignty was being infringed (however there would still be concerns with the behaviour of theHallstein Commission). Germany became a founding member of the EEC, and Konrad Adenauer was made leader in a very short time. The first formal meeting of theHallstein Commission was held on 16 January 1958 at theChateau de Val-Duchesse. The EEC (direct ancestor of the modern Community) was to create acustoms union while Euratom would promote co-operation in thenuclear power sphere. The EEC rapidly became the most important of these and expanded its activities. The first move towards political developments came at the end of 1959 when the foreign ministers of the six members announced that would be meeting quarterly to discuss political issues and international problems.[8] One of the first important accomplishments of the EEC was the establishment (1962) of common price levels for agricultural products. In 1968, internal tariffs (tariffs on trade between member nations) were removed on certain products.
French PresidentCharles de Gaulle vetoed British membership, held back the development of Parliament's powers and was at the centre of the 'empty chair crisis' of 1965.
Another crisis was triggered in regard to proposals for the financing of theCommon Agricultural Policy, which came into force in 1962. The transitional period whereby decisions were made by unanimity had come to an end, and majority-voting in the council had taken effect. Then-French PresidentCharles de Gaulle's opposition to supranationalism and fear of the other members challenging the CAP led to an "empty chair policy" whereby French representatives were withdrawn from the European institutions until the French veto was reinstated. Eventually, a compromise was reached with theLuxembourg compromise on 29 January 1966 whereby agentlemen's agreement permitted members to use a veto on areas of national interest.[9][10]
On 1 July 1967, when theMerger Treaty came into operation, combining the institutions of the ECSC and Euratom into that of the EEC, they already shared aParliamentary Assembly andCourts. Collectively they were known as theEuropean Communities. The Communities still had independent personalities although were increasingly integrated. Future treaties granted the community new powers beyond simple economic matters which had achieved a high level of integration. As it got closer to the goal of political integration and a peaceful and united Europe, whatMikhail Gorbachev described as aCommon European Home.
The 1960s saw the first attempts atenlargement. In 1961,Denmark,Ireland, theUnited Kingdom andNorway (in 1962), applied to join the three Communities. However, President Charles de Gaulle saw British membership as aTrojan Horse for U.S. influence and vetoed membership,[11] and the applications of all four countries were suspended.[12]Greece became the first country to join the EC in 1961 as an associate member, however its membership was suspended in 1967 after a coup d'état established a military dictatorship called theRegime of the Colonels.[13]
A year later, in February 1962,Spain attempted to join the European Community. However, becauseFrancoist Spain was not a democracy, all members rejected the request in 1964.
The four countries resubmitted their applications on 11 May 1967 and withGeorges Pompidou succeeding Charles de Gaulle as French president in 1969, the veto was lifted. Negotiations began in 1970 under the pro-European UK government ofEdward Heath, who had to deal with disagreements relating to theCommon Agricultural Policy and the UK's relationship with theCommonwealth of Nations. Nevertheless, two years later the accession treaties were signed so that Denmark, Ireland and the UKjoined the Community effective 1 January 1973. The Norwegian people hadrejected membership in areferendum on 25 September 1972.[14]
TheTreaties of Rome had stated that theEuropean Parliament must be directly elected, however this required theCouncil to agree on a common voting system first. The Council procrastinated on the issue and the Parliament remained appointed,[15] French President Charles de Gaulle was particularly active in blocking the development of the Parliament, with it only being grantedBudgetary powers following his resignation.[16]
Parliament pressured for agreement and on 20 September 1976 the Council agreed part of the necessary instruments for election, deferring details on electoral systems which remain varied to this day.[15] During the tenure ofPresident Jenkins, in June 1979, the elections were held in all the then-members (see1979 European Parliament election).[17] The new Parliament, galvanised by direct election and new powers, started working full-time and became more active than the previous assemblies.[15]
Shortly after its election, the Parliament proposed that the Community adopt theflag of Europe design used by theCouncil of Europe.[18][19] The European Council in 1984 appointed anad hoc committee for this purpose.[20] The European Council in 1985 largely followed the committee's recommendations, but as the adoption of a flag was strongly reminiscent of anational flag representingstatehood, was controversial, the "flag of Europe" design was adopted only with the status of a "logo" or "emblem".[1]
The European Council, or European summit, had developed since the 1960s as an informal meeting of the Council at the level of heads of state. It had originated from then-French PresidentCharles de Gaulle's resentment at the domination of supranational institutions (e.g. the commission) over the integration process. It was mentioned in the treaties for the first time in theSingle European Act (see below).[21]
Greece re-applied to join the community on 12 June 1975, following the restoration of democracy, and joined on 1 January 1981.[22] Following on from Greece, and after their own democratic restoration,Spain andPortugal applied to the communities in 1977 and joined on 1 January 1986.[23] In 1987,Turkey formally applied to join the Community and began the longest application process for any country.
With the prospect of further enlargement, and a desire to increase areas of co-operation, theSingle European Act was signed by the foreign ministers on 17 and 28 February 1986 inLuxembourg andThe Hague respectively. In a single document it dealt with reform of institutions, extension of powers, foreign policy cooperation and the single market. It came into force on 1 July 1987.[24] The act was followed by work on what would be theMaastricht Treaty, which was agreed on 10 December 1991, signed the following year and coming into force on 1 November 1993 establishing the European Union, and paving the way for theEuropean Monetary Union.
The EU absorbed the European Communities as one of itsthree pillars. The EEC's areas of activities were enlarged and were renamed theEuropean Community, continuing to follow thesupranational structure of the EEC. The EEC institutions became those of the EU, however the Court, Parliament and Commission had only limited input in the new pillars, as they worked on a moreintergovernmental system than the European Communities. This was reflected in the names of the institutions, the council was formally the "Council of theEuropean Union" while the commission was formally the "Commission of theEuropean Communities".
There are more competencies listed in Article 3 of the European Communities pillar than there are in Article 3 of the Treaty of Rome. This is due to the fact that some competencies were already inherent in the Treaty of Tome, some were referred to in the Treaty of Rome, and some were extended under Article 235 of the Treaty of Rome. Competencies were added to cover trans-European networks, and the work of the Culture Committee and Education Committee that were previously sharing existing competencies. The only entry in Article 3 that represented something new is the competence covering the entry and movement of persons in the internal market.
However, after the Treaty of Maastricht, Parliament gained a more formal role. Maastricht brought in thecodecision procedure, which gave it equal legislative power with the Council on Community matters. This replaced the informal parliamentary blocking powers established by the 1979 Isoglucose decision.[25]
It also abolished any existingstate likeSimple Majority voting in the EEC, replacing it withQualified Majority Voting, a procedure more commonly used in international organisations.
In 2002, theTreaty of Paris which established the ECSC expired, having reached its 50-year limit (as the first treaty, it was the only one with a limit). No attempt was made to renew its mandate; instead, theTreaty of Nice transferred certain of its elements to theTreaty of Rome and hence its work continued as part of the EC area of the European Community's remit.
After the entry into force of theTreaty of Lisbon in 2009 the pillar structure ceased to exist. The European Community, together with itslegal personality, was absorbed into the newly consolidated European Union which merged in the other two pillars (however Euratom remained distinct). This was originally proposed under theEuropean Constitution but that treaty failed ratification in 2005.
This sectionneeds expansion. You can help byadding to it.(December 2007)
The main aim of the EEC, as stated in its preamble, was to "preserve peace and liberty and to lay the foundations of an ever closer union among the peoples of Europe". Calling for balanced economic growth, this was to be accomplished through:[27]
Citing Article 2 from the original text of the Treaty of Rome of 25 March 1957, the EEC aimed at "a harmonious development of economic activities, a continuous and balanced expansion, an increase in stability, an accelerated raising of the standard of living and closer relations between the States belonging to it". Given the fear of the Cold War, many Western Europeans were afraid that poverty would make "the population vulnerable to communist propaganda" (Meurs 2018, p. 68), meaning that increasing prosperity would be beneficial to harmonise power between the Western and Eastern blocs, other than reconcile Member States such as France and Germany after WW2.
The tasks entrusted to the Community were divided among an assembly, the European Parliament, Council, Commission, and Court of Justice. Moreover, restrictions to market were lifted to further liberate trade among Member States. Citizens of Member States (other than goods, services, and capital) were entitled to freedom of movement. The CAP, Common Agricultural Policy, regulated and subsided the agricultural sphere. A European Social Fund was implemented in favour of employees who lost their jobs. A European Investment Bank was established to "facilitate the economic expansion of the Community by opening up fresh resources" (Art. 3 Treaty of Rome 25 March 1957). All these implementations included overseas territories. Competition was to be kept alive to make products cheaper for European consumers.
For the customs union, the treaty provided for a 10% reduction in custom duties and up to 20% of global import quotas. Progress on the customs union proceeded much faster than the twelve years planned. However, France faced some setbacks due to theirwar with Algeria.[28]
The six states that founded the EEC and the other two Communities were known as the "inner six" (the "outer seven" were those countries who formed theEuropean Free Trade Association). The six were France, West Germany, Italy and the threeBenelux countries: Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg. The first enlargement was in 1973, with the accession of Denmark, Ireland and the United Kingdom. Greece, Spain and Portugal joined in the 1980s. The formerEast Germany became part of the EEC upon German reunification in 1990. Following the creation of the EU in 1993, it has enlarged to include an additional sixteen countries by 2013.
Member states are represented in some form in each institution. TheCouncil is also composed of one national minister who represents their national government. Each state also has a right to oneEuropean Commissioner each, although in theEuropean Commission they are not supposed to represent their national interest but that of the Community. Prior to 2004, the larger members (France, Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom) have had two Commissioners. In theEuropean Parliament, members areallocated a set number seats related to their population, however these (since 1979) have been directly elected and they sit according to political allegiance, not national origin. Most other institutions, including theEuropean Court of Justice, have some form of national division of its members.
There were three political institutions which held the executive and legislative power of the EEC, plus one judicial institution and a fifth body created in 1975. These institutions (except for the auditors) were created in 1957 by the EEC but from 1967 onwards they applied to all three Communities. The Council represents the member state governments, the Parliament represents citizens and the Commission represents the European interest.[30] Essentially, the council, Parliament or another party place a request for legislation to the commission. The Commission then drafts this and presents it to the council for approval and the Parliament for an opinion (in some cases it had a veto, depending upon thelegislative procedure in use). The commission's duty is to ensure it is implemented by dealing with the day-to-day running of the Union and taking others to Court if they fail to comply.[30] After the Maastricht Treaty in 1993, these institutions became those of the European Union, though limited in some areas due to the pillar structure. Despite this, Parliament in particular has gained more power over legislation and security of the commission. The Court of Justice was the highest authority in the law, settling legal disputes in the Community, while the Auditors had no power but to investigate.
There was greater difference between these than name: the French government of the day had grown suspicious of the supranational power of the High Authority and sought to curb its powers in favour of the intergovernmental style Council. Hence the council had a greater executive role in the running of the EEC than was the situation in the ECSC. By virtue of theMerger Treaty in 1967, the executives of the ECSC and Euratom were merged with that of the EEC, creating a single institutional structure governing the three separate Communities. From here on, the termEuropean Communities were used for the institutions (for example, fromCommission of the European Economic Community to theCommission of the European Communities).[31][32][33]
TheCouncil of the European Communities was a body holding legislative and executive powers and was thus the main decision-making body of the Community. ItsPresidency rotated between themember states every six months and it is related to theEuropean Council, which was an informal gathering of national leaders (started in 1961) on the same basis as the council.[34]
The council was composed of one nationalminister from each member state. However the Council met in various forms depending upon the topic. For example, if agriculture was being discussed, the council would be composed of each national minister for agriculture. They represented their governments and were accountable to their national political systems. Votes were taken either by majority (with votes allocated according to population) or unanimity. In these various forms they share some legislative and budgetary power of the Parliament.[34] Since the 1960s the council also began to meet informally at the level of heads of government and heads of state; theseEuropean summits followed the same presidency system and secretariat as the council but was not a formal formation of it.
TheCommission of the European Communities was theexecutive arm of the community, draftingCommunity law, dealing with the day to running of the Community and upholding thetreaties. It was designed to be independent, representing the interest of the Community as a whole. Every member state submitted one commissioner (two from each of the larger states, one from the smaller states). One of its members was thePresident, appointed by the council, who chaired the body and represented it.
In 1970 and 1975, theBudgetary treaties gave Parliament power over theCommunity budget. The Parliament's members, up-until 1980 were national MPs serving part-time in the Parliament. The Treaties of Rome had required elections to be held once the council had decided on a voting system, but this did not happen and elections were delayed until 1979 (see1979 European Parliament election). After that, Parliament was elected every five years. In the following 20 years, it gradually won co-decision powers with the Council over the adoption of legislation, the right to approve or reject the appointment of the Commission President and the commission as a whole, and the right to approve or reject international agreements entered into by the Community.
TheCourt of Justice of the European Communities was thehighest court of on matters ofCommunity law and was composed of one judge per state with a president elected from among them. Its role was to ensure that Community law was applied in the same way across all states and to settle legal disputes between institutions or states. It became a powerful institution as Community law overrides national law.
The fifth institution is theEuropean Court of Auditors. Its ensured thattaxpayer funds from theCommunity budget had been correctly spent by the Community's institutions. The ECA provided anaudit report for each financial year to the Council and Parliament and gave opinions and proposals on financial legislation and anti-fraud actions. It is the only institution not mentioned in the original treaties, having been set up in 1975.[37]
Since the end ofWorld War II,sovereignEuropean countries have entered into treaties and thereby co-operated and harmonised policies (orpooled sovereignty) in an increasing number of areas, in theEuropean integration project or theconstruction of Europe (French:la construction européenne). The following timeline outlines the legal inception of theEuropean Union (EU)—the principal framework for this unification. The EU inherited many of its present responsibilities from theEuropean Communities (EC), which were founded in the 1950s in the spirit of theSchuman Declaration.
Legend: S: signing F: entry into force T: termination E: expiry de facto supersession Rel. w/ EC/EU framework: de facto inside outside
^abcdeAlthough not EU treatiesper se, these treaties affected thedevelopment of the EU defence arm, a main part of the CFSP. The Franco-British alliance established by the Dunkirk Treaty wasde facto superseded by WU. The CFSP pillar was bolstered by some of the security structures that had been established within the remit of the 1955Modified Brussels Treaty (MBT). The Brussels Treaty wasterminated in 2011, consequently dissolving the WEU, as themutual defence clause that the Lisbon Treaty provided for EU was considered to render the WEU superfluous. The EU thusde facto superseded the WEU.
^Between the EU's founding in 1993 and consolidation in 2009, the union consisted ofthree pillars, the first of which were the European Communities. The other two pillars consisted of additional areas of cooperation that had been added to the EU's remit.
^abTheiler, Tobias (2005).Political Symbolism and European Integration. Manchester University Press. pp. 61–65.ISBN9780719069949.The compromise was widely disregarded from the beginning, and the "European logo" in spite of the explicit avoidance of giving it the status of a "flag" was referred to as "Community flag" or even "European flag" from the outset.
"European Community". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved30 January 2009.The term also commonly refers to the 'European Communities', which comprise ...
"Introduction to EU Publications".Guide to European Union Publications at the EDC. The University of Exeter. Archived fromthe original on 24 September 2007. Retrieved30 January 2009.The European Community originally consisted of three separate Communities founded by treaty ...
^Raymond F. Mikesell,The Lessons of Benelux and the European Coal and Steel Community for the European Economic Community, The American Economic Review, Vol. 48, No. 2, Papers and Proceedings of the Seventieth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association (May 1958), pp. 428–441
^European Parliament Political Committee 'Towards Political Union', General Directorate Parliamentary Documentation and Information, January 1964, p. 5.
^Regarding The "Adonnino Report" - Report to the European Council by the ad hoc committee "On a People's Europe", A 10.04 COM 85, SN/2536/3/85. Under the header of "strengthening of the Community's image and identity", the Committeesuggested the introduction of "a flag and an emblem", recommending a design based on the Council of Europe flag, but with the addition of "a gold letter E" in the center of the circle of stars:"bearing in mind the independence and the different nature of the two organizations, the Committee proposes to the European Council that the European Community emblem and flag should be a blue rectangle with, in the center, a circle of twelve five-pointed gold stars which do not touch, surrounding a gold letter E, of the design already used by the Commission." Adonnino Report, p. 31.
Acocella, Nicola (1992),'Trade and direct investment within the EC: The impact of strategic considerations', in: Cantwell, John (ed.),'Multinational investment in modern Europe', E. Elgar, Cheltenham,ISBN978-1-8527-8421-8.
Balassa, Bela (1962).The Theory of Economic Integration.
.svg)
![[icon]](/mt/?noimg=&dark=on&url=http%3a%2f%2fen.wikipedia.org%2fwiki%2fFile%3aWiki_letter_w_cropped.svg)
