| Dynamoterror | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Frontal bones in front view | |
Scientific classification | |
| Domain: | Eukaryota |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Chordata |
| Clade: | Dinosauria |
| Clade: | Saurischia |
| Clade: | Theropoda |
| Family: | †Tyrannosauridae |
| Subfamily: | †Tyrannosaurinae |
| Tribe: | †Teratophoneini |
| Genus: | †Dynamoterror McDonaldet al.,2018 |
| Type species | |
| †Dynamoterror dynastes McDonaldet al., 2018 | |
Dynamoterror (meaning "powerful terror") is amonospecificgenus oftyrannosauriddinosaur fromNew Mexico that lived during theLate Cretaceous (lowerCampanian age, 78 Ma) in what is now the upper Allison Member of theMenefee Formation. The type and only species,Dynamoterror dynastes, is known from asubadult or adult individual about 9 metres (30 feet) long with an incomplete associatedskeleton. It was named in2018 by Andrew T. McDonald, Douglas G. Wolfe and Alton C. Dooley, Jr.[1]Dynamoterror was closely related toTeratophoneus andLythronax.[2]
In August 2012, a partialskeleton of atyrannosaurid was discovered and collected from the LowerCampanian Allison Member of theMenefee Formation in theSan Juan Basin of northwesternNew Mexico. The remains were found by geology students Brian Watkins and Eric Gutiérrez on an expedition led by Andrew McDonald of theWestern Science Center, and Douglas Wolfe, the CEO of the Zuni Dinosaur Institute for Geosciences. Subsequent expeditions at the Menefee Formation in 2013 and 2018 did not reveal any additional elements. The specimen was subsequently named and described in 2018 by Andrew T. McDonald, Douglas G. Wolfe, and Alton C. Dooley, Jr. Theholotype specimen, UMNH VP 28348, consists of the left and rightfrontals, fragmentaryvertebral centra, fragments ofdorsal ribs, rightmetacarpal II, the supraacetabular crest of the rightilium,phalanx 2 of left pedal digit IV, phalanx 4 of left pedal digit IV, and other unidentifiable bone fragments. The holotype specimen is currently housed at theNatural History Museum of Utah inSalt Lake City,Utah.[1]
The generic name,Dynamoterror, is derived from theGreek word "dynamis" (power) and theLatin word "terror". The specific name,dynastes, is derived from the Latin word "dynastēs" (ruler). Thebinomial name honours “Dynamosaurus imperiosus”, ajunior synonym ofTyrannosaurus, as it had been a "childhood favourite" of one of the authors.[1]
In 2020, Chan-gyu Yun consideredDynamoterror as anomen dubium because of the highly fragmentary nature of the holotype specimen and lack ofautapomorphies, as two of the original autapomorphies are present in other tyrannosaurids. Additionally, the fragmentary nature of the frontal makes it uncertain whether the autapomorphies are even comparable to other tyrannosaurids.[3]
In 1993, Adrian P. Hunt andSpencer G. Lucas reportedtooth fragments and ametatarsal of a tyrannosaurid from the Menefee Formation. In 2006,Lewis et al. reported another tooth fragment.[1][4] McDonaldet al. (2018) suggested that, due to the lack of overlapping material, the previously reported tyrannosaurid material could not be referred toDynamoterror.[1] In 2018, Sebastian G. Dalman and Spencer G. Lucas described five tyrannosaurid specimens from the Menefee Formation: NMMNH P-8313 (a right anteriorscapula), NMMNH P-22133 (a metatarsal II), NMMNH P-61274 (a shaft of an anteriorthoracic rib), NMMNH P-71332 (a lateral tooth), and NMMNH P-78032 (a leftpostorbital).[5]
A more complete specimen ofDynamoterror was identified in 2021,[6] but has not yet been described in detail. It is known as specimen WSC 1027 and is also from the Menefee Formation.[6] A detailed description of this specimen is ongoing as of 2024.[7]
 | This sectionrelies largely or entirely upon asingle source. Relevant discussion may be found on thetalk page. Please helpimprove this article by introducingcitations to additional sources at this section.(April 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Based on a specimen of a subadultTyrannosaurus, LACM 23845, the holotype specimen ofDynamoterror had a similar body length of 9 metres (30 feet).[1]
McDonald et al. (2018) originally diagnosedDynamoterror based on the prefrontonasal and prefrontolacrimal processes being in close proximity to each other, separated only by a shallow notch, and the presence of a subrectangular, concave, laterally-projecting caudal part of the postorbital suture, separated from the rostral part by a deep groove. However, they noted that the second diagnostic trait should be provisional, given theontogenetic variation observed in the postorbital suture in other tyrannosaurids.[1]
The measurements and depth/widthratio of the frontals suggests that the holotype specimen ofDynamoterror represents a subadult or adult individual. The base of thenasal process consists of the medial-most feature on the rostral surface of the frontal. The nasal process projects towards therostrum and possesses a deep notch towards the sides of the base. The deep notch marks the posterior-most point of the contact with the nasal. As inTeratophoneus andLythronax, towards the sides of the deep notch is the conical prefrontonasal process. Towards the sides of the prefrontal process is a shallower notch that marks where the prefrontal exposure is on theskull roof and towards the side of the shallow notch is the prefrontolacrimal process. The prefrontolacrimal process differs from that ofNanuqsaurus andTeratophoneus by its smaller size, but is similar to that ofLythronax,Daspletosaurus,Tyrannosaurus, andTarbosaurus. The close proximity of the prefrontonasal and prefrontolacrimal processes, separated by a shallow notch, is a unique trait ofDynamoterror. Towards the sides of the prefrontolacrimal process is a smooth surface that extends towards the back and then begins to curve towards the sides, which marks the medial-most point of thelacrimal suture. Towards the sides of the smooth surface is ventrolateral portion of the lacrimal suture that forms a rostrally facing cup-like structure that is as rostrally concave and ventrolaterally convex, as inLythronax,Daspletosaurus,Tyrannosaurus,Tarbosaurus, andNanuqsaurus.[1]
The right frontal's dorsal surface possesses a slight swelling posterior to the nasal, prefrontonasal, and prefrontolacrimal processes. Towards the rear of the swelling, the dorsal surface becomes concave and begins to slope towards the rear and sides to form the frontal portion of the supratemporalfossa. The dorsal surface rises towards the rear and the middle to form the frontal portion of thesagittal crest, which would have been very tall. Such a prominent sagittal crest is also seen inTeratophoneus,Lythronax,Bistahieversor, and an unnamed tyrannosaurine from theAguja Formation ofTexas. The tall sagittal crest ofDynamoterror and other tyrannosaurines differs from that ofalbertosaurines, such asAlbertosaurus andGorgosaurus, as both have much lower sagittal crests on the frontals. The large supratemporal fossae and tall sagittal crest on the frontals provide an expanded attachment area for large jaw-closingmuscles. The rostral region of the ventral surface is covered by an elongated and wide fossa that is defined towards the rostrum by the prefrontal suture, towards the middle by the interfrontal suture, towards the sides by the crista cranii, and towards the rear by the ethmoid scar. The fossae form the rear extent of theolfactory region of thenasal cavity, which would have been lined with amucous membrane in life. The ethmoid scar separates the rostral fossa from theolfactory bulb fossa. The orbitosphenoid suture is lined with a set of ridges, bumps, and depressions.[1]
The medial surface of the frontal possesses a vertical interfrontal suture that consists of a series of overlapping, V-shaped ridges. A narrow, deep, vertical groove separates the lacrimal and postorbital sutures, as inLythronax,Teratophoneus, andAlbertosaurus. The postorbital suture is composed of a rostral part and a caudal part. The rostral part possesses an abdominal margin that is convex and projects farther towards the sides than the upper side margin. Towards the underside of the rostral part is theorbit wall. Both the rostral and caudal parts are separated by a deep, inclined groove that opens towards the underside onto the orbital wall. This inclined groove is present on both frontals. The caudal part of the postorbital suture is subrectangular and slightly concave, which is unique toDynamoterror, but might be subject to ontogenetic variation.[1]
One of the most complete vertebral fragments ofDynamoterror is known to be part of the centrum of a middlecaudal vertebra. As inTyrannosaurus, the middle caudal centrum exhibits a pronouncedchevron articulation facet. The articulation facet is offset from the underside margin of the caudal face of the centrum. Based on comparisons of the ilia ofTeratophoneus andTyrannosaurus, a broadly arched bone fragment was identified as the supraacetabular crest of the rightilium. The underside surface of the right ilium fragment is smooth and gently concave. The supraacetabular crest is very thin at the side margins, but becomes considerably thicker towards the rear and middle, as its upper margin slopes steeply dorsally to merge with the side surface of the blade of the ilium.[1]
Based on the rightmanus ofTyrannosaurus and the left manus ofDaspletosaurus, the rightmetacarpal II was identified. The right metacarpal II is nearly straight and the articular surface nearest to the centre tapers and curves towards its upper side margin. The underside surface of the metacarpal II shaft is flat and becomes wider towards the distal articular surface. The metacarpal II does not have an apparent articulation surface on the side surfaces, while the medial surface is broad and gently concave. The broadness and concave shape of the medial surface of the metacarpal II forms a surface for articulation with the side surfaces of metacarpal I. Pedal digit IV-2 has a proximal articular surface that is subrectangular and divided into two facets by a ridge. Away from the centre of the proximal articular surface, the shaft of pedal digit IV-2 is constricted towards the middle and sides and towards the upper side and sides. A deep circular pit with a pronounced bump is present on the underside of the medial surface of the shaft. In comparison to pedal digit IV-2, pedal digit IV-4 is smaller in all dimensions. The proximal articular surface of pedal digit IV-4 is similarly divided as pedal digit IV-2. However, the facets of IV-4 are equal in size and are separated by a distinct ridge. The distal articular surface possesses a much deeper trochlea than on IV-2 that separates the medial and lateralcondyles. The lateral condyle is deeper towards the upper and under side than the medial condyle and both of them bear a deep circular fovea.[1]
McDonald et al. (2018) originally placedDynamoterror withinTyrannosaurinae, in apolytomy withLythronax,Nanuqsaurus,Teratophoneus,Daspletosaurus,Zhuchengtyrannus, and a clade containingTarbosaurus andTyrannosaurus. The authors suggested that the polytomy was likely caused by the fragmentary nature of the holotype specimen ofDynamoterror. The authors also suggested that the area of origin for the large-bodied tyrannosaurine clade is difficult to determine due to the small amount oftyrannosauroid specimens known from the Campanian ofAsia and the lack of diagnostic early tyrannosaurid material from northernLaramidia.[1] However,Voris et al. (2020) later assignedDynamoterror within a clade containingTeratophoneus andLythronax only. The authors suggested that this clade likely had different feeding strategies to tyrannosaurids belonging to the cladeDaspletosaurini because of the differing skull morphologies.[2] A study by Yun (2020) determinedDynamoterror to be a nomen dubium due to the holotype's undiagnostic, fragmentary nature.[3]
A phylogenetic analysis conducted by Voris et al. (2020) is reproduced below.[2]
The results of an earlier analysis by McDonald et al. (2018) are reproduced below.[1]
Dynamoterror is known from the upper Allison Member of the Menefee Formation which has been dated to the lowerCampanian age, about 78.5 Ma.[1] The Menefee Formation represents a widespread alluvial floodplain and consists ofmudstone,siltstone,sandstone, andcoal. The sandstones that compose the Menefee Formation are fixed within carbonaceous shales of coastal swamp orlagoon origin and are thought to have been created by flood tidal deltas that ran north and east across New Mexico and towards the retreatingWestern Interior Seaway.[8]
Dynamoterror was contemporaneous with an indeterminateankylosaur,[9] the indeterminatenodosauridInvictarx,[10] an indeterminatehadrosaurid,[9] thecentrosaurineceratopsidMenefeeceratops,[11] thebrachylophosaurin hadrosauridOrnatops,[12] an indeterminate tyrannosaurid,[9] and adromaeosaurid similar toSaurornitholestes.[9] Non-dinosaur taxa contemporaneous withDynamoterror include an indeterminatecrocodylian,[8] thealligatoroidsBrachychampsa andDeinosuchus,[13][14] an indeterminatebaenidturtle,[9] an indeterminate turtle,[8] and an indeterminatetrionychid turtle.[9][8]
.jpg)
.jpg)
.png)
.jpg)
