This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

Law This draft is within the scope ofWikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for thelegal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw Technology This draft is within the scope ofWikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage oftechnology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology Sweden This draft is within the scope ofWikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofSweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden

This draft is a completely human rewritten and fully sourced article about Legora, following previous deletion. All statements/claims have been checked for accuracy and cite independent, reputable sources (eg Business Insider, Reuters, Forbes). Legora is now a tech unicorn and widely recognised in media coverage as a leading company in the legal AI sector, with a valuation of $1.8 billion and hundreds of global law firm clients. Please let me know of any concerns.Neilyoung77 (talk)12:20, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Resubmitting after clarifying sources. Also addressed tone issues to ensure strict neutrality. The draft cites multiple in-depth, independent, reliable secondary sources including Reuters, Bloomberg Law, Business Insider, Forbes and Sifted (backed by the Financial Times). These provide substantial coverage of Legora beyond routine announcements.Neilyoung77 (talk)10:37, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keen to get feedback on this draft before resubmitting! I've addressed previous reviewer feedback by improving sourcing, making sections more concise, and removing any language that could be deemed promotional. Before resubmitting I'd be hugely grateful if any experienced editors could review the draft and suggest any further changes or additions that could be made. Thanks so much.Neilyoung77Neilyoung77 (talk)15:34, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the BusinessWire citation - the site largely seems to share press releases - and replaced with independent sources. As noted above, I have also edited language and sections to ensure neutrality. Thanks to reviewers for taking the time to look at this.Neilyoung77 (talk)15:26, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Worked on the draft to address notability concerns. Changes include:

• Cited two Financial Times articles which give substantive coverage of Legora
• Edits to remove language which could be construed as promotional. Thanks @WestwoodHights573 for your help here.
• Added an external link to a CEO interview for added context
• Have also removed reference to Reddit AMA as only citation was self-published.

Thanks as always to reviewers.Neilyoung77 (talk)09:21, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Draft-Class law pages
• NA-importance law pages
• WikiProject Law articles
• Draft-Class Technology pages
• WikiProject Technology articles
• Draft-Class Sweden pages
• NA-importance Sweden pages
• All WikiProject Sweden pages