| Submission declined on 28 November 2025 byRambley (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subjectqualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browseWikipedia:Featured articles andWikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevantWikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add theBiography,Astronomy, andWomen scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 1 October 2025 byPK650 (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subjectqualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined byPK650 58 days ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 8 July 2025 byTheroadislong (talk). This submission appears toread more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from aneutral point of view, and should refer to a range ofindependent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia'sverifiability policy and thenotability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This draft's references do not show that the subjectqualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined byTheroadislong 4 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 28 June 2025 byTheroadislong (talk). This submission appears toread more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from aneutral point of view, and should refer to a range ofindependent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia'sverifiability policy and thenotability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This draft's references do not show that the subjectqualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined byTheroadislong 5 months ago.
| |
Comment: Please include a range of reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject that cover it in significant depth. Two websites from the company themselves is not enough to establish notability sufficiently.Rambley(talk /contribs) 12:34, 28 November 2025 (UTC) | This articlemay incorporate text from alarge language model. It may includehallucinated information,copyright violations, claims notverified in cited sources,original research, orfictitious references. Any such material should beremoved, and content with anunencyclopedic tone should be rewritten.(July 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
SNTP Technologies is an engineering and manufacturing company based in Uttar Pradesh, India. The company specializes in the production of Reinforcement Couplers/Mechanical splicing systems for reinforced concrete construction, used in civil infrastructure projects.
It is the first company in India to be obtain a license under the standard IS 16172:2023 on 6th May 2024 byBureau of Indian Standards (BIS) for manufacturingISI Marked Reinforcement Couplers. This Indian standard outlines the specifications and testing protocols for mechanical splices in reinforced concrete.
{{cite web}}:Missing or empty|title= (help){{cite web}}:Missing or empty|title= (help)