Inmathematics, adouble Mersenne number is aMersenne number of the form where isprime.
The first four terms of thesequence of double Mersenne numbers are[1] (sequenceA077586 in theOEIS):
| No. of known terms | 4 |
|---|---|
| Conjecturedno. of terms | 4 |
| First terms | 7, 127, 2147483647 |
| Largest known term | 170141183460469231731687303715884105727 |
| OEIS index |
|
A double Mersenne number that isprime is called adouble Mersenne prime. Since a Mersenne numberMp can be prime only ifp is prime, (seeMersenne prime for a proof), a double Mersenne number can be prime only ifMp is itself a Mersenne prime. For the first values ofp for whichMp is prime, is known to be prime forp = 2, 3, 5, and 7 while explicit factors of have been found forp = 13, 17, 19, and 31.
| factorization of | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 3 | prime | 7 |
| 3 | 7 | prime (triple) | 127 |
| 5 | 31 | prime | 2147483647 |
| 7 | 127 | prime (quadruple) | 170141183460469231731687303715884105727 |
| 11 | not prime | not prime | 47 × 131009 × 178481 × 724639 × 2529391927 × 70676429054711 × 618970019642690137449562111 × ... |
| 13 | 8191 | not prime | 338193759479 × 210206826754181103207028761697008013415622289 × ... |
| 17 | 131071 | not prime | 231733529 × 64296354767 × ... |
| 19 | 524287 | not prime | 62914441 × 5746991873407 × 2106734551102073202633922471 × 824271579602877114508714150039 × 65997004087015989956123720407169 × 4565880376922810768406683467841114102689 × ... |
| 23 | not prime | not prime | 2351 × 4513 × 13264529 × 285212639 × 76899609737 × ... |
| 29 | not prime | not prime | 1399 × 2207 × 135607 × 622577 × 16673027617 × 52006801325877583 × 4126110275598714647074087 × ... |
| 31 | 2147483647 | not prime (triple mersenne number) | 295257526626031 × 87054709261955177 × 242557615644693265201 × 178021379228511215367151 × ... |
| 37 | not prime | not prime | |
| 41 | not prime | not prime | |
| 43 | not prime | not prime | |
| 47 | not prime | not prime | |
| 53 | not prime | not prime | |
| 59 | not prime | not prime | |
| 61 | 2305843009213693951 | unknown |
Thus, the smallest candidate for the next double Mersenne prime is, or 22305843009213693951 − 1.Being approximately 1.695×10694127911065419641,this number is far too large for any currently knownprimality test. It has no prime factor below 1 × 1036.[2]There are probably no other double Mersenne primes than the four known.[1][3]
Smallest prime factor of (wherep is thenth prime) are
Therecursively defined sequence
is called the sequence ofCatalan–Mersenne numbers.[4] The first terms of the sequence (sequenceA007013 in theOEIS) are:
Catalan discovered this sequence after the discovery of the primality of byLucas in 1876.[1][5][6]p. 22 Catalanconjectured that they are prime "up to a certain limit". Although the first five terms are prime, no known methods can prove that any further terms are prime (in any reasonable time) simply because they are too huge. However, if is not prime, there is a chance to discover this by computingmodulo some small prime (using recursivemodular exponentiation). If the resulting residue is zero, represents a factor of and thus would disprove its primality. Since is aMersenne number, such a prime factor would have to be of the form. Additionally, because iscomposite when is composite, the discovery of a composite term in the sequence would preclude the possibility of any further primes in the sequence.
If were prime, it would also contradict theNew Mersenne conjecture. It is known that is composite, with factor.[7]
In theFuturama movieThe Beast with a Billion Backs, the double Mersenne number is briefly seen in "anelementary proof of theGoldbach conjecture". In the movie, this number is known as a "Martian prime".
The footnote (indicated by the star) written by the editor Eugène Catalan, is as follows:Prouver que 261 − 1 et 2127 − 1 sont des nombres premiers. (É. L.) (*).
(*) Si l'on admet ces deux propositions, et si l'on observe que 22 − 1, 23 − 1, 27 − 1 sont aussi des nombres premiers, on a cethéorème empirique: Jusqu'à une certaine limite, si 2n − 1est un nombre premierp, 2p − 1est un nombre premierp', 2p' − 1est un nombre premier p", etc. Cette proposition a quelque analogie avec le théorème suivant, énoncé par Fermat, et dont Euler a montré l'inexactitude:Si n est une puissance de 2, 2n + 1 est un nombre premier. (E. C.)