| Dogra-Sikh Invasion of Tibet | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | |||||||||
| |||||||||
| Belligerents | |||||||||
| Commanders and leaders | |||||||||
 Khedrup GyatsoPalden Tenpai Nyima Minister Pellhün General Pi-Hsi General Banka Kahloon (WIA) General Bazgoo Kahloon (POW) General Moru Tadsi (POW) General Mandal † General Ragasha  |
| ||||||||
| Strength | |||||||||
| 10,000[citation needed] | 4,000[1] | ||||||||
| Casualties and losses | |||||||||
| Unknown | ||||||||
| Dogra–Tibetan war | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional Chinese | 森巴戰爭 | ||||||
| Simplified Chinese | 森巴战争 | ||||||
| Literal meaning | Dogra War | ||||||
| |||||||
TheDogra–Tibetan war,[2][3] also called theSino-Sikh war,[4] was fought from May 1841 to August 1842, between the forces of theDogra RajaGulab Singh ofJammu, under the suzerainty of theSikh Empire, and those ofTibet under the protectorate of theQing dynasty.[3] Gulab Singh's commander was the able generalZorawar Singh Kahluria, who, after the conquest ofLadakh, attempted to extend its boundaries in order to control the trade routes into Ladakh.[5] Zorawar Singh's campaign, suffering from the effects of inclement weather, suffered a defeat atTaklakot (Purang) and Singh was killed.[6] The Tibetans then advanced on Ladakh. Gulab Singh sent reinforcements under the command of his nephew Jawahir Singh. A subsequent battle nearChushul in 1842 led to a Tibetan defeat. A treaty was signed in 1842 maintaining thestatus quo ante bellum.[7]
In the 19th century, Ladakh was the hub of trade routes that branched out intoTurkestan andTibet. Its trade with Tibet was governed by the 1684Treaty of Tingmosgang, by which Ladakh had the exclusive right to receive thepashmina wool produced in Tibet.[8][9] The world-renownedKashmir shawl industry received its pashm wool supplies from Ladakh.[10]
In the early 1800s, theKashmir Valley and the adjoiningJammu region were part of theSikh Empire. But theDogras of Jammu were virtually autonomous under the rule of RajaGulab Singh, who was positioning himself to take control of Kashmir and all the surrounding areas after the passing of Sikh monarchMaharaja Ranjit Singh.[11] In 1834, Gulab Singh sent his ablest general andKishtwar governor,Zorawar Singh, to take control of all the territory between Jammu and the Tibet border, leading to the conquest ofLadakh andBaltistan.[12] By 1840,Ladakh andBaltistan were firmly under Dogra control, subject to the suzerainty of the Sikh Empire.[13]
The BritishEast India Company was the predominant power in the Indian subcontinent at the time. It treated the Sikh Empire as a valuable ally against the Afghans, but it also had designs for its own pashmina trade with Tibet. Zorawar Singh's conquest of Ladakh broke the Kashmiri–Ladakhi monopoly on Tibet trade, and the Tibetan pashmina wool started finding its way into British territory. To regain the monopoly, Gulab Singh and Zorawar Singh turned their eyes towards Tibet.[14][15]
From the early 18th century, Tibet had been under theprotectorate of theManchu-ledQing dynasty. AQing Amban (imperial resident) was stationed in Lhasa to report on the affairs of Tibet. Nevertheless, Qing China was fighting theFirst Opium War (1839–1842) with theBritish Empire when the Dogra invasion of Tibet took place.[16]
Zorawar Singh led a 4,000 men-strong force consisting ofLadakhis,Baltis andKishtwaris with a Dogra core.[5] The Tibetan estimate was 6,000 men. The Dogra forces had matchlocks and guns, while the Tibetans were mostly armed with bows, swords and spears.[17][18]
Zorawar Singh divided his forces into three divisions, sending one via theRupshu andHanle, one along theIndus valley towardsTashigang (Zhaxigang) and another along thePangong lake towardsRudok (Rutog). The first two contingents plundered the Buddhist monasteries at Hanle and Tashigang.[a] The third division, commanded by Zorawar Singh, captured Rudok and then moved south, joining the other branches to attackGartok.[20][17]
The Tibetan border officials had, by then, sent an alert toLhasa.[20] The Tibetan government dispatched a force under the command of cabinet minister Pellhün.[21] Meanwhile, Zorawar Singh had captured Gartok as well asTaklakot (Burang) near Nepal border. The Tibetan general at Taklakot was unable to hold the town and retreated to theMayum La, the border between Western and Central Tibet.[22]
Zorawar Singh invoked the historical claims of Ladakh to Western Tibet up to the Mayum Pass (originally calledNgari),[23] which were exercised prior to the 1648Treaty of Tingmosgang.All the captured forts were garrisoned, while the main force was encamped at Tirthapuri nearMinsar, to the west of LakeManasarovar.[24] Administration was set up to rule the occupied territories.[25] Minsar (also called Missar or Menshi), a Ladakhi enclave in Western Tibet,[26] was used to store supplies.[27]
The Chinese Amban at Lhasa reported to the emperor on 2 September 1841:
It has been learned that south of Ladakh there is a very large aboriginal tribe namedRen-chi-shen [Ranjit Singh]. Subordinate to this tribe are two smaller tribes--Sa-re-shen [Sher Singh] andKo-lang-shen [Gulab Singh], who together are known as theShen-pa ["Singh people", possibly referring Sikhs and Dogra Rajputs together]. After the death of the Ladakhi ruler [Tshe-pal Nam-gyal], a certain Ladakhi chieftain had secret connections with the Shen-pa, who then occupied Ladakh. Now this Ladakhi chieftain is once again in league with the Shen-pa aborigines who have invaded Tibetan territory, occupied two of our military posts at Gartok and Rudok, and claimed the territory west of the Mayum that had formerly belonged to Ladakh. Actually they intended to occupy more territory than this.[28]
The Dogra conquest of Ladakh had been previously advantageous to the British. The disturbances in Ladakh caused the Tibetan shawl wool to be diverted to the princely state ofBushahr, a British dependency. But, now with the Dogra conquest of the Western Tibet, this trade was disrupted.[22][29] The advance of Zorawar Singh's troops gave rise to vociferous complaints from the British to the Lahore durbar of the Sikh Empire. It was also reported that Zorawar Singh was exacting taxes fromBhotias under British protection in theByans valley. The British demanded that this should be immediately stopped and the villagers already assessed should be compensated.[30]
Added to these concerns was the possibility of intercourse between the Dogras and the Nepalese, which might have encircled British territory inKumaon andGarhwal.[22][31] But such a relationship did not materialise. The Nepalese were sympathetic to the Ladakhis and they also had ongoing relationships with the Tibetans. Even though they sent a mission to Zorawar Singh after his conquest of Taklakot, nothing further came out of it. Winter sojourn to the Dogras was refused.[32]
Nevertheless, the British were apprehensive. The Governor General brought heavy pressure on the Sikhs to recall Zorawar Singh from Tibet, and set 10 December 1841 as the deadline.[32]
Fisher et al. state that, with the winter approaching, the Dogras were not inimical to withdrawing in strength if they could make a deal with the Tibetans. But they appear to have made too high demands for the Tibetans to accept.[24] Sukhdev Singh Charak states that the Lahore Durbar responded to the British demands and ordered Zorawar Singh to return to Ladakh. In response, Zorawar Singh withdrew officers and troops from "advance posts" and from the British border, and promised to carry out the rest of the withdrawal after the snows cleared. Charak opines that these military movements, made to appease the British, weakened Zorawar Singh's position.[33]
Tibetan reinforcements arrived in November in considerable numbers. Alexander Cunningham estimated 10,000 troops.[34][b] The Mayum Pass was covered with snow, but the troops bypassed it viaMatsang. After severe fighting, Taklakot was retaken on 9 November 1841. Detachments were sent forward to cut Dogra communication lines. Reconnaissance missions sent by Zorawar Singh were annihilated.[24][35]
Eventually, Zorawar Singh decided to risk everything in an all-out campaign to recapture Taklakot. Fighting raged indecisively for three weeks.[24] In an attempt to cut the supply lines of the Tibetan forces at Taklakot, Zorawar Singh's forces marched on a side route from Minsar, along the upper course of theKarnali River, and encamped at Kardung (Kardam). Tibetans calculated that they intended to intercept the supply line at a place called Do-yo slightly to the north of Taklakot.[19] According to the Tibetan report from the battlefield:
During this period, there was a great snowstorm and snow accumulated to the depth of several feet. A well-disguised ambush was carefully laid, in which a road was left open through the middle of our lines up which the enemy could advance. The invaders marched on Do-yo from 7 A.M. to 9 A.M. on the second day, 11th month [14 December 1841]. These forces included the troops stationed at their new fort at Chi-t'ang in addition to the force led by the Wazir [Zorawar Singh], the Shen-pa commander. They advanced in three units with flags flying and drums beating. General Pi-hsi led his troops to resist their advance. The invaders fell into the ambush that had been prepared and their rearguard was cut off and could not maneuver. They were attacked by our forces from all sides.[26]
Zorawar Singh was wounded in the battle, but he continued to fight with a sword. He was beheaded by Tibetan soldiers.[26] Three hundred of the Dogra troops were killed in combat and about seven hundred were captured. The rest fled to Ladakh. The Tibetans pursued them up to Dumra (Nubra Valley,[36] possiblyDurbuk), a day's journey from Leh, where they encamped.[37]
The Sino-Tibetan force then mopped up the other garrisons of the Dogras and advanced on Ladakh, now determined to conquer it and add it to the Imperial Chinese dominions. However the force underMehta Basti Ram withstood a siege for several weeks at Chi-T’ang before escaping with 240 men across the Himalayas to the British post ofAlmora. Within Ladakh the Sino-Tibetan army laidsiege to Leh, when reinforcements underDiwan Hari Chand and Wazir Ratnu arrived fromJammu and repulsed them. The Tibetan fortifications at Drangtse were flooded when the Dogras dammed up the river. On open ground, the Chinese and Tibetans were chased toChushul. The climactic Battle of Chushul (August 1842) was won by the Dogras who killed the Tibetan army's general to avenge the death of Zorawar Singh.[38][unreliable source?][39]
On 17 September 1842, a peace treaty was agreed inLeh between the Dogras and the Tibetans, executed by an exchange of notes.[c]The Tibetan note, incorporating the concessions made by the Dogras, was handed to Gulab Singh's representatives. The Persian note, describing the Tibetan concessions, was presented to the Tibetan officials.[40] The terms were also summarised in theLadakh Chronicles as follows. Tibet recognised that Ladakh was annexed to theSikh Empire. And the Sikh Empire relinquished the ancient Ladakhi claim to western Tibet. Both sides would remain within their own territories. BiennialLopchak missions would go on as before. Ladakhi merchants would be allowed to travel toRudok,Gartok and other places in Tibet and the Tibetan merchants from Chang Thang would be allowed to go to Ladakh.[41]
The texts of the notes also state that the "old, established frontiers" between Ladakh and Tibet would be respected. The Ladakhi king and queen were to be allowed to live in Ladakh peacefully, and it is the Ladakhi king that would send the biennial Lopchak missions to Lhasa rather than the Dogra regime. All trade between the two regions was to be conducted according to "old, established custom".[42]
The treaty came into discussion in the 1960s in the context of theSino-Indian border dispute. The Indian government used the treaty to counter the Chinese contention that the border between Ladakh and Tibet had never been delimited. The Indian position was that the reference to "old, established frontiers" meant that the border had been delimited. The Chinese argued that, even if it had been delimited, there is no guarantee that it was the same as the Indian claimed boundary.[43]
.svg)
