| Dis-Chem Pharmacies | |
| Company type | Public |
| JSE:DCP | |
| ISIN | ZAE000227831 |
| Industry | Retail |
| Founded | 1978; 47 years ago (1978)[1] |
| Founder | |
| Headquarters | , |
Number of locations | 300+ (2025[2]) |
Area served | |
| Revenue | R 39.17 billion (2025[3]) |
| R 2.1 billion (2025[3]) | |
| R 1.22 billion (2025[3]) | |
| Total assets | R 19.26 million (2025[3]) |
| Total equity | R 5.23 million (2025[3]) |
Number of employees | 18,500 (2025[4]) |
| Website | www |
Dis-Chem Pharmacies Limited, commonly known asDis-Chem, is the second-largest retailpharmacy chain inSouth Africa, operating over 300 stores acrossSouthern Africa. The company offers a wide range of products, including third-party andprivate label items, bothin-store andonline, and operates a wholesale division. The company's head office is based inMidrand,Gauteng and is listen on theJSE under theticker symbol as DCP.[2][5][6]
Dis-Chem was founded in 1978 bypharmacists Ivan and Lynette Saltzman.[1][7] The pharmacy opened its first retail pharmacy inMondeor, a southern suburb ofJohannesburg.[8] The couple introduced the concept of a discount pharmacy, offering product categories that were previously unavailable in South African pharmacies due to restrictive legislation.
In 2014, Dis-Chem expanded internationally by opening its first store outside South Africa, inWindhoek,Namibia.[9] In November 2016, the company listed 27.5% of itsshare capital on theJohannesburg Stock Exchange, raising approximatelyR 4.4 billion in what was then the second-largestinitial public offering in the exchange's history.[10][11] Following the IPO, Dis-Chem announced plans to double its number of outlets by 2021, with one-third of its stores being less than three years old at the time.[12]
In July 2020, theCompetition Commission of South Africa found Dis-Chemguilty of inflating prices of certain hygiene products, such as disposableface masks, during theCOVID-19 pandemic. The Tribunal imposed an administrative penalty ofR 1.2 million,[13] significantly lower than theR 2 billion fine the Commission had initially sought. Dis-Chem chose not toappeal the decision, citing concerns overreputational harm.[14][15][16][17][18][19]