Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Direct sum of groups

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Means of constructing a group from two subgroups
icon
This articlemay need to be rewritten to comply with Wikipedia'squality standards, as several issues are raised on the discussion page.You can help. Thetalk page may contain suggestions.(March 2013)
Algebraic structureGroup theory
Group theory

Inmathematics, agroupG is called thedirect sum[1][2] of twonormal subgroups withtrivial intersection if it isgenerated by the subgroups. Inabstract algebra, this method of construction of groups can be generalized to direct sums ofvector spaces,modules, and other structures; see the articledirect sum of modules for more information. A group which can be expressed as a direct sum of non-trivial subgroups is calleddecomposable, and if a group cannot be expressed as such a direct sum then it is calledindecomposable.

Definition

[edit]

AgroupG is called thedirect sum[1][2] of twosubgroupsH1 andH2 if

  • eachH1 andH2 are normal subgroups ofG,
  • the subgroupsH1 andH2 have trivial intersection (i.e., having only theidentity elemente{\displaystyle e} ofG in common),
  • G = ⟨H1,H2⟩; in other words,G is generated by the subgroupsH1 andH2.

More generally,G is called the direct sum of a finite set ofsubgroups {Hi} if

  • eachHi is anormal subgroup ofG,
  • eachHi has trivial intersection with the subgroup⟨{Hj :ji}⟩,
  • G = ⟨{Hi}⟩; in other words,G isgenerated by the subgroups {Hi}.

IfG is the direct sum of subgroupsH andK then we writeG =H +K, and ifG is the direct sum of a set of subgroups {Hi} then we often writeG = ΣHi. Loosely speaking, a direct sum isisomorphic to a weak direct product of subgroups.

Properties

[edit]

IfG =H +K, then it can be proven that:

  • for allh inH,k inK, we have thathk =kh
  • for allg inG, there exists uniqueh inH,k inK such thatg =hk
  • There is a cancellation of the sum in a quotient; so that(H +K)/K is isomorphic toH

The above assertions can be generalized to the case ofG = ΣHi, where {Hi} is a finite set of subgroups:

  • ifij, then for allhi inHi,hj inHj, we have thathihj =hjhi
  • for eachg inG, there exists a unique set of elementshi inHi such that
g =h1h2 ∗ ... ∗hi ∗ ... ∗hn
  • There is a cancellation of the sum in a quotient; so that((ΣHi) +K)/K is isomorphic to ΣHi.

Note the similarity with thedirect product, where eachg can be expressed uniquely as

g = (h1,h2, ...,hi, ...,hn).

Sincehihj =hjhi for allij, it follows that multiplication of elements in a direct sum is isomorphic to multiplication of the corresponding elements in the direct product; thus for finite sets of subgroups, ΣHi is isomorphic to the direct product ×{Hi}.

Direct summand

[edit]

Given a groupG{\displaystyle G}, we say that a subgroupH{\displaystyle H} is adirect summand ofG{\displaystyle G} if there exists another subgroupK{\displaystyle K} ofG{\displaystyle G} such thatG=H+K{\displaystyle G=H+K}.

In abelian groups, ifH{\displaystyle H} is adivisible subgroup ofG{\displaystyle G}, thenH{\displaystyle H} is a direct summand ofG{\displaystyle G}.

Examples

[edit]

Equivalence of decompositions into direct sums

[edit]

In the decomposition of a finite group into a direct sum of indecomposable subgroups the embedding of the subgroups is not unique. For example, in theKlein groupV4C2×C2{\displaystyle V_{4}\cong C_{2}\times C_{2}} we have that

V4=(0,1)+(1,0),{\displaystyle V_{4}=\langle (0,1)\rangle +\langle (1,0)\rangle ,} and
V4=(1,1)+(1,0).{\displaystyle V_{4}=\langle (1,1)\rangle +\langle (1,0)\rangle .}

However, theRemak-Krull-Schmidt theorem states that given afinite groupG = ΣAi = ΣBj, where eachAi and eachBj is non-trivial and indecomposable, the two sums have equal terms up to reordering and isomorphism.

The Remak-Krull-Schmidt theorem fails for infinite groups; so in the case of infiniteG =H +K =L +M, even when all subgroups are non-trivial and indecomposable, we cannot conclude thatH is isomorphic to eitherL orM.

Generalization to sums over infinite sets

[edit]

To describe the above properties in the case whereG is the direct sum of an infinite (perhaps uncountable) set of subgroups, more care is needed.

Ifg is an element of thecartesian product Π{Hi} of a set of groups, letgi be theith element ofg in the product. Theexternal direct sum of a set of groups {Hi} (written as ΣE{Hi}) is the subset of Π{Hi}, where, for each elementg of ΣE{Hi},gi is the identityeHi{\displaystyle e_{H_{i}}} for all but a finite number ofgi (equivalently, only a finite number ofgi are not the identity). The group operation in the external direct sum is pointwise multiplication, as in the usual direct product.

This subset does indeed form a group, and for a finite set of groups {Hi} the external direct sum is equal to the direct product.

IfG = ΣHi, thenG is isomorphic to ΣE{Hi}. Thus, in a sense, the direct sum is an "internal" external direct sum. For each elementg inG, there is a unique finite setS and a unique set {hiHi :iS} such thatg = Π {hi :i inS}.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abHomology. Saunders MacLane. Springer, Berlin; Academic Press, New York, 1963.
  2. ^abLászló Fuchs. Infinite Abelian Groups
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Direct_sum_of_groups&oldid=1251347659"
Category:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp