Location of Historical Complex of Split with the Palace of Diocletian in Croatia
Diocletian's Palace (Croatian:Dioklecijanova palača,pronounced[diokletsijǎːnovapǎlatʃa];Latin:Palatium Diocletiani) is anancient Roman palace and fortress complex built at the end of the third century AD by theRoman Emperor Diocletian as his retirement residence. About half of the complex was for Diocletian's personal use, with the rest housing the military garrison. The complex was built on a peninsula six kilometres (3.7 mi) southwest fromSalona, the former capital ofDalmatia, one of thelargest cities of the late empire with 60,000 people and the birthplace of Diocletian.
Today the palace forms about half of the old town ofSplit, Croatia, with 3,000 inhabitants and numerous shops, boutiques, cafes, bars, and restaurants. In 1979, it was listed byUNESCO as aWorld Heritage Site.
Diocletian had ordered the construction of the heavily fortified compound near his hometown ofSpalatum in preparation for his retirement on 1 May 305 AD.[1] The site chosen was nearSalona, the provincial administrative centre ofDalmatia, on the southern side of a short peninsula. Based on Roman map data (known through the medieval parchment copy of theTabula Peutingeriana), there was already a Spalatum settlement in that bay, the remains and size of which have not yet been established.
Reconstruction of Diocletian's Palace in its original appearance upon completion in AD 305 (viewed from the south-west)Diocletian's Palace Today (viewed from the east)
The beginning of the construction of Diocletian's palace has not exactly been established. It is assumed to have begun around 295, after the introduction of theTetrarchy (the rule of four). Yet ten years after that decision, when Diocletian abdicated in 305, the palace seems to have still been unfinished, and there are indications that some works were taking place while the emperor was residing at the Palace. It is unknown under whose architectural ideas the palace was built and who its builders were. The complex was modelled onRoman forts of the 3rd-century era, examples of which can be seen across thelimes, such as the bridgehead fort ofCastrum Divitia across theRhine fromCologne.[2]
However, the engraved Greek names Zotikos and Filotas, as well as many Greek characters, indicate that a number of builders were originally from the eastern part of the empire, i.e. Diocletian brought with him masters from the East. Still, a large part of the workforce was likely of local origin. The basic materials came from close proximity. The white limestone comes fromBrač and some of Seget nearTrogir;tufa was extracted from nearby riverbeds, and bricks were made in Spalatum and other workshops located nearby.
AtCarnuntum, people begged Diocletian to return to the throne in order to resolve the conflicts that had arisen throughConstantine's rise to power and Maxentius' usurpation.[3] Diocletian famously replied:
If you could show the cabbage that I planted with my own hands to your emperor, he definitely wouldn't dare suggest that I replace the peace and happiness of this place with the storms of a never-satisfied greed.[4]
This was a reference to the Emperor retiring to his palace to growcabbages.
Diocletian lived on for four more years, spending his days in his palace gardens. He saw histetrarchic system fail, torn by the selfish ambitions of his successors. He heard of Maximian's third claim to the throne, his forced suicide, and hisdamnatio memoriae. In his palace, statues and portraits of his former companion emperor were torn down and destroyed. Deep in despair and illness, Diocletian may have committedsuicide. He died on 3 December 312.[5][6][Note 1]
With the death of Diocletian, the life of the palace did not end, and it remained an imperial possession of the Roman court, providing shelter to the expelled members of the Emperor's family. In 480, EmperorJulius Nepos was murdered by one of his own soldiers, reportedly stabbed to death in his villa near Salona.[7] Since Diocletian's palace was in the area, it might have been the same building.
Its second life came when Salona was largely destroyed in the invasions of theAvars andSlavs in the 7th century, though the exact year of the destruction still remains an open debate between archaeologists. Part of the expelled population, now refugees, found shelter inside the palace's strong walls and with them a new, organized city life began.[8] Since then, the palace has been continuously occupied, with residents making their homes and businesses within the palace basement and directly in its walls.[9]St Martin's Church is an example of this trend. Today many restaurants and shops, and some homes can still be found within the walls.
In the period of the free medieval commune, between the 12th and 14th centuries, there was a greater architectural development when many medieval houses filled not only Roman buildings but also a large part of the free space of streets and docks. Also completed in this period was the construction of theRomanesquebell tower of theCathedral of Saint Domnius, which inhabits the building that was originally erected as Jupiter's temple and then used as the Mausoleum of Diocletian.[10]
After theMiddle Ages, the palace was virtually unknown in the rest of Europe until the Scottish architectRobert Adam had the ruins surveyed. Then, with the aid of French artist and antiquaryCharles-Louis Clérisseau and several draughtsmen, Adam publishedRuins of the Palace of Emperor Diocletian at Spalatro in Dalmatia (London, 1764).[11]
Diocletian's palace was an inspiration for Adam's new style ofNeoclassical architecture[12] and the publication of measured drawings brought it into the design vocabulary of European architecture for the first time. A few decades later, in 1782, the French painterLouis-François Cassas created drawings of the palace, published byJoseph Lavallée in 1802 in the chronicles of his voyages.[13]
Today, the Palace is well preserved with all the most important historical buildings, in the centre of the city of Split, the second-largest city of modern Croatia. Diocletian's Palace far transcends local importance because of its degree of preservation. The Palace is one of the most famous and complete architectural and cultural features on the CroatianAdriatic coast. As the world's most complete remains of a Roman palace, it holds an outstanding place in Mediterranean, European, and world heritage.
View of the Peristyle in 1764, engraving byRobert Adam. The Peristyle is the central square of the palace, where the main entrance to Diocletian's quarters (pictured) is located.
In November 1979,UNESCO, in line with the international convention on cultural and natural heritage, adopted a proposal that the historic city of Split built around the Palace should be included in the register ofWorld Cultural Heritage.[14]
In November 2006, the city council decided to permit over twenty new buildings within the palace (including a shopping and garage complex), although the palace had been declared aWorld Heritage Site. It is said that this decision was politically motivated and largely due to lobbying by local property developers. Once the public 2007 became aware of the project, they petitioned against the decision and won. No new buildings, shopping centres or underground garages were built.
TheWorld Monuments Fund has been working on a conservation project at the palace, including surveying structural integrity and cleaning and restoring the stone and plasterwork.
The palace was depicted on thereverse of the Croatian 500kuna banknote, issued in 1993.[15][16]
In recent years,conservationists and scholars have increasingly examined Diocletian's Palace in a broader debate over architectural heritage andpreservation methods. Preservation efforts have focused on balancing structural restoration with maintaining the palace as an active part of theSplit community. Unlike many ancient ruins that have been isolated for preservation, Diocletian's Palace remains a lived-in space, integrating historical conservation with contemporary urban life.[17] Key conservation projects include the stabilization of the vaulted basement, preservation of the Peristyle, andadaptive reuse of historic structures for residences and businesses. Rather than removing later additions, preservationists have embraced the palace's layered history, allowing it to function as both a historic monument and an active part of Split's urban fabric.[17] Researchers such as Jorge Otero-Pailos have highlighted how conservation practices not only protect the palace's physical fabric but also influence its cultural perception, reinforcing its significance as a living heritage site.[18] The preservation of this palace is an exploration of how material decay, restoration techniques, and public engagement shape the site'shistorical authenticity.
The ground plan of the palace is an irregular rectangle measuring east: 214.97 m, north: 174.74 m, south: 181.65 m (adjusting for the terrain), with sixteen towers projecting from the western, northern, and eastern facades on the facades facing the mainland. There are four towers on the corners of the square, giving the palace a characteristic of thelegionary forts similar to those on theDanube.[19]
Two of the six octagonal ground-floor towers were framed by three landing entrances, the six rectangular ground floors of the rectangular floor being between the corner and the octagonal. To date, three corner towers (except the southwestern) have been preserved, and only the remains of octagonal and rectangular ones. Three well-preserved landings have been architecturally fragmented, especially the northern one, which was the main approach fromSalona. The south,seaside gate, is small, simple and well-preserved. The facade walls of the palace in their lower parts are massive and simple without openings, and in the upper part, there are large arches that face the land, i.e. on the west, north and east facades.Subterranean portions of the palace featurebarrel vaulted stonework.
The Palace is built of white locallimestone andmarble of high quality, most of which was from the Brač marble quarries on the island ofBrač, oftuff taken from the nearby river beds, and of brick made inSalonitan and other factories. Some material for decoration was imported:Egyptiangranitecolumns, fine marble for revetments and some capitals produced in workshops in theProconnesos.
Southern walls in Split (South part of the palace), recorded byGeorge Niemann in 1906.
Northern walls in Split (North part of the palace), recorded byGeorge Niemann in 1907.
Eastern walls in Split (East part of the palace), recorded byGeorge Niemann in 1907.
Only the southern facade, which rose directly from or very near to the sea, was unfortified. The elaborate architectural composition of the arcaded gallery on its upper floor differs from the more severe treatment of the three shore facades. A monumental gate in the middle of each wall led to an enclosed courtyard. The southern'Sea Gate' (thePorta Meridionalis) was simpler in shape and dimensions than the other three, and it is thought that it was originally intended either as the emperor's private access to the sea or as a service entrance for supplies.
The Porta septemtrionalis ("the northern gate") is one of the four principal Roman gates into the Palace. Originally the Main gate from which the Emperor entered the complex, the gate is on the road to the north, towardsSalona, the then capital of the Roman province ofDalmatia and Diocletian's birthplace. It is probably the gate the Emperor entered after hisabdication from the imperial throne on 1 May 305.[20] Today the 7th-century church ofSt Martin can be found above the gate, and is open to the public.
The Porta Orientalis ("the eastern gate")[21] is one of the four principal Roman gates into the Palace. Originally a secondary gate, it faces east towards the Roman town of Epetia, todayStobreč.[22] Probably in or around the 6th century, above the gate in the sentry corridor, a small church dedicated to St Apolinar[23] was built. This coincided with the complex seeing aninflux of refugees from outlying communities, similar churches were over theGolden Gate, theIron Gate, and theBronze Gate. The structure of this part of the wall and the door itself were later incorporated in various buildings in the following centuries, such as the Church of Dušica, which was destroyed in the Second World War.[21]
Porta Occidentalis ("the western gate")[24] is one of the four principal Roman gates into the Palace. Originally a military gate from which troops entered the complex, the gate is the only one to have remained in continuous use to the present day. During thepersecutions under Theodosius I a relief sculpture ofNike, the Roman goddess of Victory (which stood on the lintel) was removed from the gate, later in the 5th century,Christians engraved aCross in its place.[24][25] In the 6th century, above the gate a small church dedicated toSt. Teodora.[26] This coincided with the complex seeing aninflux of refugees from outlying communities, similar churches were over theGolden Gate, theSilver Gate, and theBronze Gate.
The Porta Meridionalis or "the southern gate" is the smaller of the four principal Roman gates into the Palace. Originally a sea gate from which the Emperor entered the complex by boat, via basement rooms in the Imperial Palace.
The design is derived from bothvilla andcastrum types and this duality is also evident in the arrangement of the interior. The transverse road (decumanus) linking theEastern gate andWestern gate divided the complex into two halves.
Reconstruction of the façade to the sea from E. Hébrard and J. Zeiller, Spalato, le Palais de Dioclétien, Paris, 1912
In the southern half there were more luxurious structures than in the northern section; these included public, private and religious buildings, as well as theEmperor's apartments.
TheEmperor's apartments formed a block along the seafront, with an exterior square and circular floor plan, with a dome. From there, one approached the Emperor's apartment, which stretched 40 m deep along the entire south facade; it is only partly preserved on the upper floor, but its ground-floor, translated substructures that directly bore it are almost completely preserved, so the overall layout and appearance of the upper spaces can be seen given the coincidence of the upper and lower floor plans. On the west side of the upper floor are preserved the remains of a dome hall and two halls with apses, and on the east side are parts of an octagonal dining room (triclinium) with three halls with a cross floor plan. The wall of the Western Cross Hall is preserved at full height. Diocletian's apartment was interconnected by a long room along the southern façade (cryptoporticus)[27] from which through 42 windows and 3 balconies a view of the sea was opened. Two baths were recently found north of the Emperor's apartment, one adjacent to the west and the other to the eastern halls. Although for many centuries almost completely filled with refuse, most of the substructure is well preserved and indicates the original shape and disposition of the rooms above.
A rotunda, that was once the first section of the imperial corridor in the Palace that led via the Peristyle to the Imperial apartments[28] of the Palace.
Set below what were the Imperial apartments, theCellars of Diocletian's Palace are a set of substructures located at the southern end of the Palace,[29] that represent one of the best preserved ancient complexes of their kind in the world.[30]
A monumental court, the Peristyle, formed the northern access to the imperial apartments in front of the Vestibule. It also gave access to Diocletian's mausoleum on the east (today theCathedral of Saint Domnius) and to three temples on the west (two of which are now lost, with the third, originally being thetemple of Jupiter, becoming a baptistery). There is also a temple just to the west of the Peristyle called The Temple ofAesculapius, which has a semi-cylindrical roof built of stone blocks, which did not leak until the 1940s when it was covered with a lead roof. The temple was recently restored.
The Palace was decorated with numerous 3500-year-old granitesphinxes, originating from the site[dubious –discuss] of Egyptian PharaohThutmose III.Originally twelvesphinxes brought from Egypt by EmperorDiocletian.[31] Scottish architectRobert Adam considered this temple to be one of Europe's most beautiful monuments. Only three have survived the centuries. One is still on the Peristyle, the second sits headless in front ofJupiter's temple, and a third is housed in the city museum.
Dedicated to the Ancient Roman godJupiter, it is located in the western part of the southern section of the Palace complex, near thePeristyle. It was built between 295 and 305, during the construction of the Palace. Since the Emperor unexpectedly abdicated the throne in 305 and arrived at the palace fromNicomedia earlier, finishing work on the construction of the Palace was stopped so parts of the Temple remained unfinished. The temple was later converted into a church, probably a Baptistery of St.John the Baptist in the 6th century, at the same time when the crypt dedicated toSt. Thomas was built.[32]
The northern half of the palace, divided into two parts by the main north–south street (cardo) leading from theGolden Gate (Porta aurea) to the Peristyle, is less well preserved. It is usually supposed that each part was a residential complex housing soldiers, servants, and possibly some other facilities.
Both parts of the palace were apparently surrounded by streets,[14] leading to the perimeter walls through a rectangular buildings (possibly storage magazines).[dubious –discuss]
Reconstruction of Jupiter's Temple (now St. John's Church).
Cutaway reconstruction drawing by E. Hébrard, showing the temple's vaulted interior.
Granite sphinx of Ramses II. 3,500 years old, it comes from the site of Pharaoh Thutmose III. The other two Sphinxes can be found in the Temple of Jupiter in Diocletian's Palace, and in the Split Museum.
^The range of dates proposed for Diocletian's death have stretched from 311 through to 318. Until recently, the date of 3 December 311 has been favoured; however, the absence of Diocletian on Maxentius' "AETERNA MEMORIA" coins would indicate that he was alive through to Maxentius' defeat in October 312. Given that Diocletian had died by the time ofMaximian Daia's death in July 313, it has been argued that the correct date of his death was 3 December 312.[5]
^Wilhelm Ensslin, "Julius Nepos", inPaulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, Band XVI,2 (1935), S. 1505–1510.
^Charles George Herbermann,The Catholic Encyclopedia: An International Work of Reference (1913). See also Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus,De administrando imperio; Greek text edited by Gy. Moravcsik; English translation by R. J. H. Jenkins. Rev.ed., Dumbarton Oaks Center for Byzantine Studies, 1967, 1985; and Thomae Archidiaconi (Archdeacon Thomas of Split),Spalatensis Historia Salonitanorum atque Spalatinorum pontificum (History of the Bishops of Salona and Split). Damir Karbić, Mirjana Matijević Sokol, Olga Perić, and James Ross Sweeney, eds. Budapest: CEU Press ( 2006).