Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Destroyer escort

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
US Navy warship classification
This article is about US Navy Destroyer Escort classification. For other uses, seeDestroyer escort (disambiguation).
Not to be confused withEscort destroyer.
USSEvarts

Destroyer escort (DE) was theUnited States Navy mid-20th-century classification for a 20-knot (37 km/h; 23 mph)warship designed with the endurance necessary to escort mid-oceanconvoys ofmerchant marine ships.[1]

Development of the destroyer escort was promoted by the British need inWorld War II for anti-submarine ships that could operate in open oceans at speeds of up to 20 knots. These "British Destroyer Escort"s were designed by the US for mass-production underLend-Lease as a less expensive alternative to fleetdestroyers.[2]

TheRoyal Navy and Commonwealth forces identified such warships asfrigates, and that classification was widely accepted when the United States redesignated destroyer escorts as frigates (FF) in 1975. From circa 1954 until 1975 new-build US Navy ships designated as destroyer escorts (DE) were calledocean escorts. Similar types of warships in other navies of the time included the 46 diesel poweredKaibōkan of theImperial Japanese Navy,[3] 10KriegsmarineF-class escort ships, and the twoAmiral Murgescu-class vessels of theRomanian Navy.

Postwar destroyer escorts and frigates were larger than those produced during wartime, with increased anti-aircraft capability, but remained smaller and slower than postwar destroyers.[4] AsCold War destroyer escorts became as large as wartime destroyers, the United States Navy converted some of their World War II destroyers toescort destroyers (DDE).[5]

General description

[edit]
USS Dealey

Full-sizeddestroyers must be able to steam as fast or faster thancruisers and fastcapital ships such asfleet carriers. This typically requires a speed of 25–35knots (46–65 km/h) (dependent upon the era and navy). They must carrytorpedoes and a smaller caliber of naval guns to use against enemy ships, anti-aircraft guns, and antisubmarine detection equipment and weapons. While these requirements made the destroyer a fast all-around combatant, this made them too valuable to be relegated to convoy escort duties.

A destroyer escort needed only to be able to maneuver relative to a slow convoy (which in World War II would travel at 10 to 12 knots (19 to 22 km/h)), be able to defend against aircraft, and detect, pursue, and attacksubmarines. These lower requirements greatly reduce the size, cost, and crew required for the destroyer escort. Destroyer escorts were optimized for antisubmarine warfare, having a tighter turning radius and more specialized armament (such as the forward-firingHedgehog mortar) than fleet destroyers. The slower speed of destroyer escorts was not a liability in this context assonar was useless at speeds over 20 knots (37 km/h).

As an alternative to geared steam-turbine propulsion found insloops of similar purpose, size and speed (as well as full-sized destroyers and larger warships), many US destroyer escorts of the World War II period had diesel-electric orturboelectric drive, in which the engine rooms functioned as power stations supplying current to electric motors sited close to the propellers. Electric drive was selected because it does not need gearboxes (produced on special precise machining tooling available in limited quantities, which were heavily in demand for the fast fleet destroyers) to adjust engine speed to the much lower optimal speed for the propellers. The current from the engine room can be used equally well for other purposes, and after the war, many destroyer escorts were re-used as floating power stations for coastal cities inLatin America under programs funded by theWorld Bank.[citation needed].Edsall-class ships were the exception to this and they used a geared diesel engine to drive the propellers directly.John C. Butlers used the typical boiler and geared turbine propulsion system.

Destroyer escorts were also useful for coastal antisubmarine andradar picket ship duty. During World War II, seven destroyer escorts (DEs) were converted to radar picket destroyer escorts (DERs), supplementing radar picket destroyers. Although these were relegated to secondary roles after the war, in the mid-1950s, 36 more DEs wereconverted to DERs, serving as such until 1960–1965.[6] Their mission was to extend theDistant Early Warning Line on both coasts, in conjunction with 16Guardian-class radar picket ships, which were convertedLiberty ships.

During World War II, some 95 destroyer escorts were converted by the US tohigh-speed transports (APDs). This involved adding an extra deck which allowed space for about 10 officers and 150 men. Two largedavits were also installed, one on either side of the ship, from which landing craft (LCVPs) could be launched.[citation needed]

Origins

[edit]

TheLend-Lease Act was passed into law in the United States in March 1941, enabling the United Kingdom to procure merchant ships, warships, munitions, and other materiel from the US, to help with the war effort. This enabled the UK to commission the US to design, build, and supply an escort vessel that was suitable for antisubmarine warfare in deep open-ocean situations, which they did in June 1941. Captain E.L. Cochrane of theAmerican Bureau of Shipping came up with a design which was known as theBritish destroyer escort (BDE). The BDE designation was retained by the first six destroyer escorts transferred to the United Kingdom (BDE 1, 2, 3, 4, 12, and 46); of the initial order of 50, these were the only ones theRoyal Navy received, the rest being reclassified as destroyer escorts on 25 January 1943 and taken over by theUnited States Navy.[7]

When the United States entered the war, and found they also required an antisubmarine warfare ship and that the destroyer escort fitted their needs perfectly, a system of rationing was put in place whereby out of every five destroyer escorts completed, four would be allocated to the U.S. Navy and one to the Royal Navy.

Alternatives

[edit]

Destroyer escorts were designed and built to naval construction standards, and as such could only be built at yards experienced with naval standards. TheUnited States Maritime Commission created its S2-S2-AQ1 design – which was based on the British-designed River class – for much the same role but using civilian construction standards. These ships would be classed by the Navy as theTacoma class frigates (PF).[8] These frigates had a greater range than the superficially similar destroyer escorts, but the US Navy viewed them as decidedly inferior in all other respects. TheTacoma class had a much larger turning circle than destroyer escorts, lacked sufficient ventilation for warm-weather operations (a reflection of their original British design and its emphasis on operations in the colder North Atlantic Ocean), were criticized as far too hot below decks, and, because of the mercantile style of their hulls, had far less resistance to underwater explosions than ships built to naval standards like the destroyer escorts.[9]

Post–World War II U.S. ship reclassification

[edit]

After World War II, new-buildUnited States Navy destroyer escorts were referred to asocean escorts, but retained thehull classification symbol DE. However, other navies, most notably those ofNATO countries and theUSSR, followed different naming conventions for this type of ship, which resulted in some confusion. To remedy this problem, the1975 ship reclassification declared ocean escorts (and by extension, destroyer escorts) asfrigates (FF). This brought the USN's nomenclature more in line with NATO, and made comparing ship types with the Soviet Union easier. As of 2006, no plans existed for future frigates for the US Navy.USS Zumwalt and thelittoral combat ship (LCS) were the main ship types planned in this area. However, by 2017 the Navy had reversed course, and put out a Request For Proposals (RFP) for a new frigate class, temporarily designatedFFG(X). One major problem with ship classification is whether to base it on a ship's role (such as escort or air defense), or on its size (such as displacement). One example of this ambiguity is theTiconderoga-class air-defense ship class, which is classified ascruiser, though it uses the same hull as theSpruance-class destroyers.

Vietnam War

[edit]

During theVietnam War, theRepublic of Vietnam Navy received twoEdsall-class destroyer escorts from the United States.

US Navy destroyer escort classes

[edit]
Class namePropulsionGunsTorpedoesLead shipCommissionedShips built
Evarts (GMT)[10]diesel - electric3 ×3in/500USSEvarts (DE-5)15 April 1943[a]97
Buckley (TE)[11]turbo - electric3 × 3in/503 × 21inUSSBuckley (DE-51)30 April 1943148
Cannon (DET)[12]diesel - electric3 × 3in/503 × 21inUSSCannon (DE-99)26 September 194372
Edsall (FMR)[13]geared diesel3 × 3in/503 × 21inUSSEdsall (DE-129)10 April 1943  85
Rudderow (TEV)[14]turbo - electric2 ×5in/383 × 21inUSSRudderow (DE-224)15 May 194422
John C. Butler (WGT)[15]geared turbine2 × 5in/383 × 21inUSSJohn C. Butler (DE-339)  31 March 194483
Dealey[16]geared turbine4 × 3in/504 × 21inUSSDealey (DE-1006)3 June 195413
Claud Jones[17]diesel2 × 3in/506 × 13inUSSClaud Jones (DE-1033)10 February 19594
Bronstein[18]geared turbine2 × 3in/50 Mk33,[19]ASROC6 × 13inUSSBronstein (DE-1037)15 June 19632
Garcia[20]geared turbine2 × 5in/38USSGarcia (DE-1040)21 December 196410
Brooke[21]geared turbine1 × 5in/38USSBrooke (DEG-1)12 March 19666
Knox[22]geared turbine1 x5in/54USSKnox (DE-1052)12 April 196946
  1. ^the first ship commissioned of the class wasHMSBayntun on 20 January 1943

World War II shipbuilding programs

[edit]

total ships in the table: 507DEs + 56APDs

37Buckleys listed here asBuckleys were converted to APDs after having been commissioned as destroyer escorts. All APDs listed in the table were completed as conversions.Captains were converted before commissioning as DEs.

BuilderStateEvarts + CaptainBuckley + Captain
(+Charles Lawrence APDs)
CannonEdsallRudderow
(+Crosley APDs)
Butlertotal
(laid down from)Feb 1942Jul 1942Oct 1942Jun 1942Jul 1943Aug 1943
(launched until)Feb 1944May 1944Aug 1944Dec 1943Apr 1944Aug 1944
(commissioned from)Apr 1943Apr 1943May 1943Apr 1943Dec 1943Dec 1943
(commissioned until)Aug 1944Jul 1944Dec 1944Feb 1944Sep 1944Dec 1945
Consolidated SteelTX12 (+6)47(+3)3493
Bethlehem
(Fore River and
Hingham)
MA27 + 4614 (+23)87
Bethlehem, San FranciscoCA1212
Boston Navy YardMA21 + 311062
Brown ShipbuildingTX382361
Federal Shipbuilding and Drydock CompanyNJ361652
Mare Island Navy YardCA3131
Philadelphia Navy YardPA5 + 1102 (+4)18
Dravo CorporationDE, PA3 (PA)15 (DE)18
Charleston Navy YardSC152 (+9)17
Defoe Shipbuilding CompanyMI134 (+11)17
Western Pipe and Steel CompanyCA1212
Norfolk Navy YardVA1010
Tampa Shipbuilding CompanyFL99
Puget Sound Navy YardWA88
companycontract[23]issuedamountdeliverydescription[24]
various navy yards11/41[25]DE-1 ... DE-50
Consolidated SteelOBS3781/42$110,426,0009/43destroyer escorts DE 129-152
Brown ShipbuildingOBS4031/42$63,558,00010/43destroyer escorts DE 238-255
Federal Shipbuilding and Drydock CompanyOBS4011/42$85,440,0002/44destroyer escorts DE 162-197
Dravo Corporation,WilmingtonOBS3771/42$52,903,0004/44destroyer escorts DE 99-128
Bethlehem, HinghamOBS3762/42$118,800,00012/43destroyer escorts DE 51-98[26]
Brown ShipbuildingOBS3358/42$151,833,0007/44destroyer escorts DE 382-437[27]
Consolidated SteelOBS3348/42$197,505,00011/44destroyer escorts DE 316-381[27]
Bethlehem, San FranciscoOBS3318/42$28,427,0007/44destroyer vessels DE 633-664
Federal Shipbuilding and Drydock CompanyOBS3338/42$44,560,0003/45destroyer escorts DE 438-515
Bethlehem, HinghamOBS3328/42$155,364,0008/45destroyer escorts DE 563-632[26]
Defoe Shipbuilding CompanyOBS79510/42$54,366,0009/44destroyer escorts DE 693-738
Bethlehem, Fore RiverOBS84010/42$35,365,00011/44destroyer escorts DE 675-692
Consolidated SteelOBS84411/42$42,372,0003/44destroyer escorts DE 789-904
Dravo Corporation,PittsburghOBS84111/42$11,845,0004/44destroyer escorts DE 665-674
Western Pipe and Steel CompanyOBS84211/42$44,132,0009/44destroyer escorts DE 739-762
Tampa Shipbuilding CompanyOBS84311/42$31,779,00012/44destroyer escorts DE 763-788

Data from "Ship's Data U.S. Naval Vessels"[28]

ClassCompanyContractValueHulls
WGTC.Steel8/42$2,043,000339-368
WGTfederal8/42$2,785,000438-450, 508-510
WGTBrown8/42$2,517,000402-424
FMRC.Steel1/42$1,988,000129-149
FMRC.Steel8/42$1,539,000316-336
FMRBrown1/42$2,921,000250-252
FMRBrown8/42$2,183,000389-400

hull numbers for WGT and FMR are still incomplete, price of $2,157 for Brown/WGT DE-423 is assumed to be a typo

other classes missing (work in progress)

From the same document, List of Naval Vessels, pp. 11:

TypeHullsCancelled Hulls
GMT5-50
TE51-98
DET99-113114-128
FMR129-152
TE153-161
DET162-197
TE198-223
TEV224-237
FMR238-255
GMT256-283284-300
GMT301-307308-315
FMR316-338
WGT339-372373-381
FMR382-401
WGT402-424425-437
WGT438-450451-507
WGT508-510511-515
GMT516-530
WGT531-542543-562
TE563-578
TEV579-606607-632
TE633-636
GMT637-644
TEV645-664
TE665-673
TEV674
TE675-683
TEV684-692
TE693-705
TEV706-722723-738
DET739-750751-762
DET763-771772-788
TE789-800801-1005

Captain-class frigates of the Royal Navy

[edit]
Main article:Captain-class frigate
HMS Dacres, converted to act as a headquarters ship duringOperation Neptune

TheCaptain class was a designation given to 78 frigates of the Royal Navy, constructed in the United States, launched in 1942–1943 and delivered to the United Kingdom under the provisions of the Lend-Lease agreement (under which the United States supplied the United Kingdom and otherAllied nations with materiel between 1941 and 1945),[29][30] they were drawn from two subclasses of the destroyer escort (originally British destroyer escort) classification: 32 from theEvarts subclass and 46 from theBuckley subclass.[7][29] Upon reaching the UK, the ships were substantially modified by the Royal Navy, including removal of torpedo tubes, making them distinct from the US Navy destroyer escort ships.[31]

Captain-class frigates acted in the roles ofconvoy escorts, antisubmarine warfare vessels,[32]coastal forces control frigates and headquarters ships for theNormandy landings. During the course of World War II, this class participated in the sinking of at least 34 German submarines and a number of other hostile craft with 15 of the 78Captain-class frigates being either sunk or written off as aconstructive total loss.

In the postwar period, all of the survivingCaptain-class frigates except one (HMSHotham) were returned to the US Navy before the end of 1947 to reduce the amount payable under the provisions of the Lend-Lease agreement; the last such frigate was returned to United States custody in March 1956.[33][34]

Free French

[edit]

SixCannon-class destroyer escorts were built for theFree French Navy. Although initially transferred under the Lend-Lease Act, these ships were permanently transferred under the Mutual Defense Assistance Program (MDAP).

Mutual Defense Assistance Program – Post WWII

[edit]

Under theMDAP the destroyer escorts leased to the Free French were permanently transferred to the French Navy. In addition, the following navies also acquired DEs:

Republic of China Navy (Taiwan)

[edit]
DE-47,DE-6

French Navy

[edit]
DE-1007, DE-1008, DE-1009, DE-1010, DE-1011, DE-1012, DE-1013, DE-1016, DE-1017, DE-1018, DE1019

Hellenic Navy

[edit]
DE-173,DE-766,DE-768,DE-193

Italian Navy

[edit]
DE-1020, DE-1031

Japanese Maritime Self-Defense Force

[edit]
DE-168,DE-169

Philippine Navy

[edit]
DE-168,DE-169,DE-170,DE-770,DE-771,DE-251,DE-637

Portuguese Navy

[edit]
DE-509, DE-1032, DE-1039, DE-1042, DE-1046

Republic of Korea Navy

[edit]
DE-770,DE-771

Royal Navy

[edit]

DE-574[note 1][33]

Royal Netherlands Navy

[edit]
USSBurrows (DE-105),USSRinehart (DE-196),USSGustafson (DE-182),USSO'Neill (DE-188),USSEisner (DE-192),USSStern (DE-187)

Royal Thai Navy

[edit]
DE-746

National Navy of Uruguay

[edit]
DE-166,DE-189,

Comparison with contemporary frigates

[edit]

The table below compares destroyer escorts and frigates designed for similar missions.

NameDateNationDisplacementSpeedNumber builtNotes
River-class frigate1942UK1,370 tons20 knots151[35]
Type A Kai kaibōkan1943Japan870 tons19 knots18[3]
FMR class1943US1,200 tons21 knots85[13]
Evarts-class1943US1,140 tons21 knots72[10]
Buckley-class1943US1,400 tons23 knots102[11]
Cannon-class1943US1,240 tons21 knots72[12]
Tacoma-class frigate1943US1,430 tons20 knots96[36]
Type B kaibōkan1943Japan940 tons19 knots37[3]
Loch-class frigate1944UK1,435 tons20 knots30anti-submarine[37]
WGT class1944US1,350 tons24 knots87[15]
TEV class1944US1,450 tons24 knots22[14]
Bay-class frigate1945UK1,580 tons20 knots26anti-aircraft, built on Loch class hulls[37]
Type 15 frigate1952UK2,300 tons31 knots23Rebuilds ofWar Emergency Programme destroyers into anti-submarine frigates
Dealey class1954US1,450 tons25 knots13[16]
Type E50 frigate1955France1,290 tons28 knots4fast[38]
Type 14 frigate1955UK1,180 tons24 knots15Also known asBlackwood-class. "second-rate" anti-submarine warfare frigates. Cheaper to produce than Type 12.[39]
St. Laurent class1955Canada2,263 tons28 knots7anti-submarine[40]
Type B1956Japan1,070 tons25 knots2diesel[41]
Type 12 frigate1956UK2,150 tons31 knots8[note 2]Also known asWhitby class. Anti-submarine frigates for combating fast submarines[42]
Type E52 frigate1956France1,295 tons28 knots14fast[43]
Almirante Clemente-class light destroyer1956Venezuela1,300 tons32 knots6fast[44]
Type 61 frigate1957UK2,170 tons24 knots4Salisbury class. aircraft direction[45]
Centauro-class frigate1957Italy1,807 tons26 knots4[46]
Type 41 frigate1957UK2,300 tons24 knots7Leopard class. anti-aircraft escort for convoys[47]
Azopardo-class frigate1957Argentina1,160 tons20 knots2[48]
Restigouche class1958Canada2,366 tons28 knots7anti-submarine[49]
Claud Jones class1959US1,450 tons22 knots4[17]
Type 12M frigate1960UK2,380 tons30 knots14[note 3]Rothesay class. ."Modified" Type 12. Anti-submarine[50]
Köln-class frigate1961Germany2,100 tons30 knots6fast[51]
River-class destroyer escort1961Australia2,100 tons30 knots6Originally designated as anti-submarine frigates, later re-designated as destroyer escorts.[52] Four built to British Type 12M design, two built to Type 12I design
Isuzu-class destroyer escort1961Japan1,490 tons25 knots4[53]
Type 81 frigate1961UK2,300 tons28 knots7Tribal-class. Originally multi-role ("general purpose") sloops for Middle East. Reclassified as "second class" frigates.[54]
Bergamini-class frigate1961Italy1,410 tons26 knots4[55]
Commandant Rivière-class frigate1962France1,750 tons25 knots13dual purpose[43]
Mackenzie class1962Canada2,366 tons28 knots4anti-submarine[49]
Hvidbjørnen-class frigate1962Denmark1,345 tons18 knots4fishery protection[56]
Type 12I frigate1963UK2,450 tons30 knots28[note 4]Leander class. "Improved" Type 12. General purpose.[57] Also built asNilgiri-class frigate (India, 6),Condell-class (Chile, 2), River-class (Australia,2)
Bronstein class1963US2,360 tons26 knots2[18]
Garcia class1964US2,620 tons27 knots10[20]
Oslo-class frigate1966Norway1,450 tons25 knots5[58]
Brooke class1966US2,640 tons27 knots6guided missile[21]
Peder Skram-class frigate1966Denmark2,030 tons28 knots2fast[59]
Van Speijk-class frigate1967Netherlands2,200 tons28 knots6Dutch version of the BritishLeander[60]
Alpino-class frigate1968Italy2,000 tons28 knots2[55]
Alvand-class frigate1968Iran1,110 tons40 knots4[61]
Knox class1969US3,011 tons27 knots46[22]
Chikugo-class destroyer escort1971Japan1,470 tons25 knots11[53]

Surviving destroyer escorts

[edit]

Four destroyer escorts are preserved as museum ships, while others remain in active service.

See also

[edit]

Notes and references

[edit]

Public Domain This article incorporates text from thepublic domainDictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships.

Footnotes

[edit]
  1. ^DE-574 was originally provided to the United Kingdom under theLend-Lease (Public Law 77-11) scheme, DE-574 was returned to the US custody under the provisions of the Lend-Lease scheme on the 25 April 1952 and simultaneously transferred back to the United Kingdom under the Mutual Defence Assistance Program.
  2. ^Includes 2 built for India
  3. ^Includes 2 built for New Zealand and 3 built for South Africa
  4. ^Includes 2 built for New Zealand

Source notes

[edit]
  1. ^Blackman, pp. 393 & 394
  2. ^Potter & Nimitz, p. 550
  3. ^abcWatts, pp. 225–239
  4. ^Cooney, pp. 6 & 7
  5. ^NAVPERS, pp. 32 & 35
  6. ^Friedman, Destroyers, pp 230–232
  7. ^abFranklin 1999, p. 7.
  8. ^Friedman, Small Combatants
  9. ^Gardiner, Robert, ed.,Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1922–1946, New York: Mayflower Books, 1980,ISBN 0-8317-0303-2, pp. 148–149.
  10. ^abSilverstone, pp. 153–157
  11. ^abSilverstone, pp. 157–163
  12. ^abSilverstone, pp. 164–167
  13. ^abSilverstone, pp. 167–170
  14. ^abSilverstone, pp. 163 & 164
  15. ^abSilverstone, pp. 170–175
  16. ^abBlackman, p. 458
  17. ^abBlackman, p. 457
  18. ^abBlackman, p. 456
  19. ^rapid-fire version using an auto-loading mechanism to insert the shell into the breech
  20. ^abBlackman, p. 455
  21. ^abBlackman, p. 452
  22. ^abBlackman, p. 453
  23. ^Alphabetic Listing of Major War Supply Contracts: Cumulative June 1940 Through September 1945. Civilian production administration, Industrial statistics division. 1946.
  24. ^Silverstone, pp. 153–175 & 276–280
  25. ^Ship's Data, U.S. Naval Vessels, DE data tables
  26. ^abLenton & Colledge, pp. 245–247
  27. ^abMorison, Samuel Eliot (1962).History of United States Naval Operations in World War II. Vol. XV. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. pp. 50–52.
  28. ^"Ships' Data -- U.S. Naval Vessels - BuShips".
  29. ^abLenton 1998, pp. 198–199.
  30. ^Morison 1956, p. 34.
  31. ^Collingwood 1998, pp. 30–31.
  32. ^Franklin 1999, p. x.
  33. ^abDANFS: Hotham.
  34. ^Lenton 1974, p. 16.
  35. ^Lenton & Colledge, p. 225
  36. ^Silverstone, p. 246
  37. ^abLenton & Colledge, p. 232
  38. ^Blackman, p. 114
  39. ^Blackman, p. 354
  40. ^Blackman, p. 44
  41. ^Blackman, p. 199
  42. ^Blackman, p. 353
  43. ^abBlackman, p. 113
  44. ^Blackman, p. 624
  45. ^Blackman, p. 356
  46. ^Blackman, p. 183
  47. ^Blackman, p. 355
  48. ^Blackman, p. 8
  49. ^abBlackman, p. 43
  50. ^Blackman, p. 351
  51. ^Blackman, p. 127
  52. ^Blackman, p. 21
  53. ^abBlackman, p. 198
  54. ^Blackman, p. 350
  55. ^abBlackman, p. 182
  56. ^Blackman, p. 79
  57. ^Blackman, p. 348
  58. ^Blackman, p. 240
  59. ^Blackman, p. 78
  60. ^Blackman, p. 229
  61. ^Blackman, p. 167

Bibliography

[edit]

Online sources

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
  • On the subject of a particular example of this type of ship in World War II, theUSSAbercrombie (DE-343), seeLittle Ship, Big War: The Saga of DE-343 by Edward Peary Stafford. Naval Institute Press (2000)ISBN 1-55750-890-9
  • On the subject of the Captain-class frigate variant of the destroyer escort in World War II, seeThe Captain Class Frigates in the Second World War by Donald Collingwood. published by Leo Cooper (1998),ISBN 0-85052-615-9

External links

[edit]
Naval ships andwarships in 19th and 20th centuries
Aircraft carriers
Battleships
Cruisers
Escort
Transport
Patrol craft
Fast attack craft
Mine warfare
Command and support
Submarines
Miscellaneous
Related
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Destroyer_escort&oldid=1314657007"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp