Despot ordespotes (Ancient Greek:δεσπότης,romanized: despótēs,lit. 'lord, master')[1][2][n 1] was a seniorByzantinecourt title that was bestowed on the sons or sons-in-law of reigning emperors, and initially denoted theheir-apparent of theByzantine emperor.
From Byzantium it spread throughout the late medievalBalkans and was also granted in the states under Byzantine cultural influence, such as theLatin Empire, theSecond Bulgarian Empire, theSerbian Empire and its successor states (Bulgarian andSerbian:деспот,romanized: despót), and theEmpire of Trebizond. With the political fragmentation of the period, the term gave rise to several principalities termed "despotates" which were ruled either as independent states or asappanages by princes bearing the title of despot; most notably theDespotate of Epirus, theDespotate of the Morea, theDespotate of Dobruja and theSerbian Despotate.
In modern usage, the word has taken a different meaning: "despotism" is a form of government in which a single entity rules with absolute power. Thesemantic shift undergone by the term is mirrored by "tyrant", an ancient Greek word that originally bore no negative connotation, and the Latin "dictator", a constitutionally sanctioned office of theRoman Republic. In colloquialModern Greek, the word is often used to refer to abishop. In English, the feminine form of the title is despotess (from Ancient Greek:δεσπότισσα,romanized: despótissa; Bulgarian:деспотица,romanized: despotítsa; Serbian:деспотица/despotica), which denoted the spouse of a despot, but the transliterated traditional female equivalent ofdespotes,despoina (Ancient Greek:δέσποινα,romanized: déspoina,lit. 'lady of the house'), is also commonly used.
The originalGreek termδεσπότης (despotes) meant simply 'lord' and was synonymous withκύριος (kyrios). As the Greek equivalent to the Latindominus,despotes was initially used as a form of address indicating respect.[6] As such it was applied to any person of rank, but in a more specific sense to God (e.g.Revelation 6:10), bishops and the patriarchs, and primarily theRoman andByzantine Emperors. Occasionally it was used in formal settings, for example on coins (sinceLeo III the Isaurian) or formal documents.[6][7] During the 8th and 9th centuries, co-emperors appear on coinage with the addressdespotes, but this was still a mark of respect rather than an official title.[6][n 2] Senior emperors were also occasionally addressed asdespotes. Before the 12th century, the honorific was used interchangeably with the more formal title ofbasileus.[6]
Although it was used for high-ranking nobles from the early 12th century, the title of despot began being used as a specific court title byManuel I Komnenos, who conferred it in 1163 to the future KingBéla III of Hungary, the Emperor's son-in-law and, until the birth ofAlexios II in 1169, heir-presumptive. According to the contemporary Byzantine historianJohn Kinnamos, the title of despot was analogous to Béla's Hungarian title ofurum, or heir-apparent.[7][9]
From this time and until the end of the Byzantine Empire, the title of despot became the highest Byzantine dignity, which placed its holders "immediately after the emperor" (Rodolphe Guilland).[10] Nevertheless, the Byzantine emperors from theKomnenoi to thePalaiologoi, as well as theLatin Emperors who claimed their succession and imitated their styles, continued to use the termdespotes in its more generic sense of 'lord' in their personal seals and in imperial coinage.[10][11][12] In a similar manner, the holders of the two immediately junior titles ofsebastokrator andCaesar could be addressed asdespota (δεσπότα).[13] The despot shared with theCaesar another appellatory epithet,eutychestatos (εὐτυχέστατος, 'most fortunate') orpaneutychestatos (πανευτυχέστατος, 'most fortunate of all').[14]
During the last centuries of Byzantium's existence, the title was awarded to the younger sons of emperors (the eldest sons were usually crowned as co-emperors, with the title ofbasileus) as well as to the emperor's sons-in-law (gambroi). The title entailed extensive honours and privileges, including the control of large estates – the domains of Michael VIII's brotherJohn Palaiologos for instance included the islands ofLesbos andRhodes – to finance their extensive households. Like the junior titles ofsebastokrator andCaesar however, the title of despot was strictly a courtly dignity, and was not tied to any military or administrative functions or powers.[15] Women could not hold a noble title, but bore the titles of their husbands. Thus the spouse of a despot, the despotess (despotissa), had the right to bear the same insignia as he. Among the women of the court, the despotesses likewise took the first place after the empress.[16]
The use of the title spread also to the other countries of the Balkans. TheLatin Empire used it to honour theDoge of VeniceEnrico Dandolo and the local ruler of theRhodope region,Alexius Slav. After ca. 1219 it was regularly borne (it is not clear whether the title was awarded by the Emperor or usurped) by theVenetianpodestàs in Constantinople, as the Venetian support became crucial to the Empire's survival.[17] In 1279/80, it was introduced inBulgaria to placate the powerful magnate (and later Tsar)George Terter in 1279/80. During theSerbian Empire it was widely awarded among the various Serbian magnates, withJovan Oliver being the first holder, and it was held by lesser principalities as well, including the self-proclaimed Albaniandespots of Arta.[7][18] In the 15th century, the Venetian governors ofCorfu were also styled as despots.[7] As the title of despot was conferred by the emperor and usually implied a degree of submission by the awardee, the Palaiologan emperors tried long to persuade theEmperors of Trebizond, who also claimed the Byzantine imperial title, to accept the title of despot instead. OnlyJohn II of Trebizond and his sonAlexios II, however, accepted the title, and even they continued to use the usual imperial title ofbasileus in their own domains.[19]
With the death of the last Byzantine EmperorConstantine XI on May 29, 1453, the creation of a despot became irregular. The title was granted byPope Paul II toAndreas Palaiologos, heir to the Byzantine throne in 1465,[20][21] and by the king of Hungary to the heirs of theSerbian Despotate.
From the mid-14th century on, various territories were given to imperial princes with the rank of despot to rule as semi-autonomousappanages, some of which have become widely known in historiography as "despotates" (sing.δεσποτάτον,despotaton, in Greek); in the Byzantine world, these were chiefly theDespotate of Epirus and theDespotate of the Morea.[7][22] The close association of title and territory began already from the late 13th century and became widespread from the mid-14th century, as a steady succession of despots began to rule over the same territory.[7][23] Nevertheless, the term "despotate" is technically inaccurate: the title of despot, like every other Byzantine dignity, was not hereditary nor intrinsic to a specific territory. Even in the so-called "despotates", a son of a despot might succeed to his father's territory but could not and would not hold the title unless it was conferred anew by the emperor.[7][22] In normal Byzantine usage, a clear distinction was drawn between the personal dignity of despot and any other offices or attributes of its holder. Thus for instanceJohn II Orsini was described as "the ruler ofAcarnania, the despot John" rather than "the despot of Acarnania" by the emperor-historianJohn VI Kantakouzenos (r. 1347–1354).[24]
According to the mid-14th-centuryBook of Offices ofPseudo-Kodinos and the descriptions given by the historianGeorge Pachymeres, the despot's insignia in the Byzantine court were characterised by the colours purple and white, and a rich decoration in pearls.[25] In detail, the insignia were:
The despot also had the right to sign his letters with an ink of a dark red colour (the emperor's was bright red).[34]
| Name | Tenure | Conferred by | Notes | Refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Béla III of Hungary | 1163–1169 | Manuel I Komnenos | Son-in-law and heir-presumptive until 1169, thereafter demoted toCaesar | [9] |
| Theodore Vatatzes | unknown | Manuel I Komnenos | Married to Manuel I's sister Eudokia. His holding of the title is attested only in the seal of his son. | [35][36] |
| Alexios Palaiologos | 1200–1203 | Alexios III Angelos | Son-in-law and heir-apparent of Alexios III, second husband of Irene Angelina. Maternal grandfather of Michael VIII | [37][38][39] |
| Theodore I Laskaris | 1203–1208 | Alexios III Angelos | Son-in-law of Alexios III, he was probably granted the title of despot after the death of Alexios Palaiologos. He founded theEmpire of Nicaea and was proclaimed emperor in 1205, although he was not crowned until 1208 and was still formally despot until then. | [37][40] |
| Leo Sgouros | 1203/1204–1208 | Alexios III Angelos | Ruler of much of southern Greece, he met Alexios III after he was evicted from Constantinople by theFourth Crusade. Sgouros marriedEudokia Angelina and was named despot and heir-apparent by the exiled emperor | [37][41] |
| John Chamaretos | 1208 – unknown | Alexios III Angelos | Lord ofLaconia, mentioned as despot in a letter from 1222. He was possibly awarded the title by Alexios III after Leo Sgouros' death | [41][42] |
| Andronikos Palaiologos | 1216 – unknown | Theodore I Laskaris | Son-in-law and heir-apparent of Theodore I. Very little is known about him with certainty. He marriedIrene Laskarina and was raised to despot, but died soon after. | [43][44] |
| Manuel Komnenos Doukas | 1225/1227–1230 | Theodore Komnenos Doukas | Brother of Theodore, he was raised to the rank of despot after Theodore crowned himself emperor. As heir to Theodore and ruler ofThessalonica, Manuel held the title of emperor (basileus) after 1230 | [45][46] |
| Constantine Komnenos Doukas | 1225/1227 – unknown | Theodore Komnenos Doukas | Brother of Theodore, he was raised to the rank of despot after Theodore crowned himself emperor. | [47][48] |
| John Komnenos Doukas | 1242–1244 | John III Vatatzes | Ruler of Thessalonica, he abandoned the imperial title and acknowledged the suzerainty of Nicaea in 1242, being rewarded with the title of despot. | [22][49] |
| Demetrios Angelos Doukas | 1244–1246 | John III Vatatzes | Inherited rule of Thessalonica from his brother John and was conferred like him with the title of despot. Deposed by John III in 1246. | [50][51] |
| Michael VIII Palaiologos | 1258–1259 | John IV Laskaris | Leader of the nobles, he was declared regent after the murder ofGeorge Mouzalon and raised first tomegas doux and then, within weeks, to despot. He was crowned emperor on 1 January 1259. | [52][53] |
| John Palaiologos | 1259 – c. 1273/1275 | Michael VIII Palaiologos | Brother of Michael VIII, he was elevated to the rank of despot following his victory at theBattle of Pelagonia. He renounced the insignia and privileges of a despot, but not the title itself, after his defeat at theBattle of Neopatras in 1273/1275, and died shortly after. | [54][55] |
| Demetrios Doukas Komnenos Koutroules | unknown | Michael VIII Palaiologos | Third son of Michael II of Epirus, he married Anna, one of the daughters of Michael VIII, and was named despot. | [42] |
| Constantine Palaiologos | unknown | Michael VIII Palaiologos | Third son of Michael VIII, he is attested as a Despot in seals. | [56] |
| John II of Trebizond | 1282–1297 | Michael VIII Palaiologos | Emperor of Trebizond, he was persuaded to renounce his own claim to be "Emperor of the Romans" and accept the title of despot and the hand of Michael VIII's daughter Eudokia. John visited Constantinople in 1282, when the title was conferred and the marriage with Eudokia took place. He nevertheless retained the imperial title in an altered form. | [19][57] |
| Constantine Palaiologos | 1292–1320s | Andronikos II Palaiologos | Second son of Andronikos II, he was named despot on his marriage to the daughter ofTheodore Mouzalon | [58] |
| John Palaiologos | 1294 – unknown | Andronikos II Palaiologos | Third son of Andronikos II, he was named despot on 22 May 1294 | [58] |
| Alexios II of Trebizond | c. 1297–1330 | Andronikos II Palaiologos | Son and successor of John II of Trebizond | [19] |
| Demetrios Palaiologos | 1306 – after 1343 | Andronikos II Palaiologos | Fifth son of Andronikos II, named despot in 1306 | [59][60] |
| Theodore Palaiologos | unknown | Andronikos II Palaiologos | Fourth son of Andronikos II, named despot at an unknown date, from 1305Marquess of Montferrat | [59] |
| Manuel Palaiologos | unknown – 1320 | Andronikos II Palaiologos | Second son ofMichael IX Palaiologos, named despot at an unknown date, killed by mistake by his brotherAndronikos III Palaiologos | [59] |
| Michael Palaiologos | before 1341 – unknown | Andronikos III Palaiologos | Second son of Andronikos III, named despot at a very young age | [61] |
| Momchil | 1343/44–1345 | Anna of Savoy | Bulgarian ruler of theRhodopes, awarded the title by the Empress-regent during theByzantine civil war of 1341–1347, in order to detach him fromJohn VI Kantakouzenos, who titled himsebastokrator. Effectively independent until defeated and killed by Kantakouzenos' army. | [62] |
| Manuel Komnenos Raoul Asanes | before 1358 – unknown | John VI Kantakouzenos | Brother-in-law of John VI Kantakouzenos, named firstsebastokrator by him and despot at an unknown date | [63] |
| John Kantakouzenos | 1357 – unknown | John V Palaiologos | Eldest son of Matthew Kantakouzenos, named despot on his father's abdication of his imperial title | [63] |
| Michael Palaiologos | unknown | John V Palaiologos | Third son of John V, ruler ofMesembria, murdered in 1376/7 | [64][65] |
| Andronikos Palaiologos | 1409 – c. 1424 | Manuel II Palaiologos | Third son of Manuel II, Despot inThessalonica from 1409 until 1423 (styled "Despot of Thessaly" byDoukas), shortly thereafter he entered a monastery | [66] |
| John Palaiologos | unknown | Manuel II Palaiologos | Son of Andronikos, Despot of Thessalonica. He is mentioned as holding the title in 1419. | [67] |
| Name | Tenure | Conferred by | Notes | Refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manuel Kantakouzenos | 1347–1380 | John VI Kantakouzenos | Second son of John VI, named despot after theByzantine civil war of 1341–1347, first "Despot of the Morea" from 1349 until his death | [68] |
| Theodore I Palaiologos | before 1376–1407 | John V Palaiologos | Third son of John V, from 1383 until his death "Despot ofLacedaemon" | [64] |
| Theodore II Palaiologos | 1406/1407–1448 | Manuel II Palaiologos | Second son of Manuel II, Despot in the Morea from 1407, and inSelymbria from 1443 to his death | [69] |
| Constantine XI Palaiologos | unknown – 1449 | Manuel II Palaiologos | Fourth son of Manuel II and last Byzantine emperor. Despot in Selymbria until 1443, thereafter co-despot in the Morea until 1449, when he succeeded to the Byzantine throne | [70] |
| Demetrios Palaiologos | 1425–1460 | Manuel II Palaiologos | Fifth son of Manuel II, despot inLemnos from 1425 to 1449, in Mesembria from 1440, co-despot in the Morea from 1449 until the Ottoman conquest in 1460 | [66] |
| Thomas Palaiologos | 1428–1460 | John VIII Palaiologos | Sixth son of Manuel II, co-despot in the Morea from 1428 until the Ottoman conquest in 1460. According toSphrantzes, however, he was not titled despot until 1449, when his brother Constantine became emperor. | [71] |
| Manuel Kantakouzenos | 1453 | Grandson ofDemetrios I Kantakouzenos, he was acclaimed as leader and despot of the Morea by the local Albanian and Greek inhabitants during the failedMorea revolt of 1453–1454. He was soon eclipsed byGiovanni Asen Zaccaria. | [72][73] | |
| Titular claimants in exile | ||||
| Andreas Palaiologos | 1465 – 1502 | Pope Pius II (?) | Eldest son of Thomas Palaiologos and heir of the Palaiologan line. According to Sphrantzes, he was awarded the title of Despot of the Morea by the Pope, but R. Guilland suggested that he may have already received the title before 1460. In his seal he bore the title "By the grace of God, Despot of theRomans" (Latin:Dei gratia despotes Romeorum).Claimant to the Byzantine throne from 1465 to 1494. | [70][20][74][72][73] |
| Fernando Palaiologos | 1502 – unknown | Self-proclaimed | Possibly an illegitimate son of Andreas Palaiologos, he adopted the title upon the death of Andreas in 1502. His subsequent fate is unknown. | [75] |
| Constantine Arianiti | 1502/07 – 1530 | Self-proclaimed | An Albanian nobleman, he claimed the fictional titles 'Prince of Macedonia' and 'Duke of Achaea' since the 1490s. He adopted the title of Despot of the Morea after the death of Andreas, sometime between 1502 and 1507. He was appointed governor ofFano by the Pope, and died there in 1530. | [76] |
| Later pretenders | ||||
| Gian Antonio Lazier | 1720 – 1738 | Self-proclaimed, recognized byCharles VI | Italian impostor and pretender to the Byzantine throne who was recognized by theHoly Roman Emperor,Charles VI. He claimed, among other titles, the title of 'Despot of the Peloponnese'. | [77] |
| Radu Cantacuzino | 1735 – unknown | Self-proclaimed, possibly recognized byCharles VI | Romanian prince and pretender to the Byzantine throne who was possibly recognized by theHoly Roman Emperor,Charles VI. He claimed, among other titles, the title of 'Despot of the Peloponnese'. | [77] |
| Name | Tenure | Conferred by | Notes | Refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael II Komnenos Doukas | before 1246–1267/1268 | John III Vatatzes | Nephew of Manuel Komnenos Doukas, ruler ofEpirus | [78][79] |
| Nikephoros I Komnenos Doukas | before 1248/1250–1297 | John III Vatatzes | Son and heir of Michael II ofEpirus, he was awarded the title on his betrothal to Maria, the granddaughter of John III. He ruled Epirus from his father's death in 1267/1268. | [50][80] |
| Thomas I Komnenos Doukas | 1297–1318 | Andronikos II Palaiologos | Only son and heir of Nikephoros I ofEpirus | [42] |
| Nicholas Orsini | 1319/20–1323 | Andronikos II Palaiologos | Count palatine of Cephalonia and Zakynthos, he assassinated and usurped his uncle, Thomas I of Epirus, in 1318. He was named despot in 1319/20 in exchange for recognizing the annexation ofIoannina by the Byzantine Empire. | [81][82] |
| Nikephoros II Orsini | 1347–1359 | John VI Kantakouzenos | Son-in-law of John VI, named despot after theByzantine civil war of 1341–1347, ruler of Epirus in 1335–1338 and 1356–1359 | [83] |
| Thomas II Preljubović | 1382–1384 | John V Palaiologos | Son ofGregory Preljub, he was given the rule ofIoannina and its region by his father-in-lawSimeon Uroš in 1367. The title of despot was not formally conferred by the Byzantine Emperor until 1382 however. | [84][85] |
| Esau de' Buondelmonti | ca. 1385 – 1411 | John V Palaiologos (?) | An Italian, he was possibly involved in the murder of Thomas Preljubović, and succeeded him as ruler of Ioannina when he married his widowMaria. | [86] |
| Carlo I Tocco | 1415–1429 | Manuel II Palaiologos | Count palatine of Cephalonia and Zakynthos, he succeeded in obtainingIoannina in 1411 shortly after the death of his uncle Esau de' Buondelmonti. To formalize his position, in 1415 he sent his brotherLeonardo to Emperor Manuel to obtain confirmation as Despot. In 1416, Carlo re-united the old Despotate of Epirus by capturingArta as well. | [87] |
| Titular claimants in exile | ||||
| Carlo II Tocco | 1429–1448 | Successor of Carlo I Tocco as Count palatine of Cephalonia and Zakynthos and ruler of Epirus. He claimed the traditional title of despot, but was never officially conferred it by a Byzantine emperor | [88] | |
| Leonardo III Tocco | 1448–1503 | Successor of Carlo II Tocco as Count palatine of Cephalonia and Zakynthos and titular despot of Epirus. He ruled in the islands until the Ottoman conquest of 1479, and thereafter maintained his claims in exile in Italy. | [89][90][91] | |
| Carlo III Tocco | 1503–1518 | Son of Leonardo III Tocco andMilica Branković, granddaughter ofThomas Palaiologos. Claimed the inheritance of "the despots of Romania and Arta" | [91][92] | |
| Name | Tenure | Conferred by | Notes | Refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enrico Dandolo | 1204–1205 | Baldwin I of Constantinople | Doge of Venice and the driving force behind theFourth Crusade's capture of Constantinople, as well as behind Baldwin's election as Latin Emperor instead ofBoniface of Montferrat. Named Despot as the main vassal of the Latin Empire. Şerban Marin, however, suggests that the reference to Dandolo as Despot in Greek sources was not as the court dignity, but as a Greek translation of the titledominus, indicating hislordship over three-eighths of the former Byzantine Empire. | [93][94][95] |
| Alexius Slav | 1208/9 – after 1222 | Henry of Flanders | Autonomous Bulgarian ruler of theRhodopes, named Despot when he married an illegitimate daughter of Emperor Henry and became a Latin vassal. | [96][97][98] |
| Jacopo Tiepolo | 1219–1221 | Yolanda of Flanders (?) | VenetianPodestà of Constantinople, he may have been given the title of "Despot of the Empire of Romania" (despotes imperii Romaniae) by Empress-regent Yolanda to secure Venetian support, or he may have appropriated it himself. | [99] |
| Marino Storlato | 1222–1223 | Robert of Courtenay | Venetian Podestà of Constantinople | [100][101] |
| Albertino Morosini | c. 1238 | Baldwin II of Constantinople | Venetian Podestà of Constantinople | [98] |
| Philip I, Prince of Taranto | 1294/97–1315, 1330–1332 | Charles II of Naples | Husband ofThamar, the daughter of Nikephoros I of Epirus. On Nikephoros' death, he was given the title "Despot of Romania" on behalf of his wife and as the ruler of allAngevin or subject territories in Albania (the "Kingdom of Albania") and Greece north of theGulf of Corinth (Thamar's dowry inAetolia, and the rest of the Epirote state in its capacity as an Angevin vassal). | [42][102] |
| Philip | 1315–1330 | Philip I, Prince of Taranto | Eldest surviving son of Philip of Taranto, granted the title and claims of the "Despotate of Romania" in 1315 until his death. | [103] |
| Martino Zaccaria | 1325–1345 | Philip I, Prince of Taranto | Lord of Chios,Samos andKos. He was awarded the title of "King and Despot of Asia Minor" by Philip in hopes of enlisting him in an effort to reclaim Constantinople. | [104][105] |
| Robert, Prince of Taranto | 1332–1346 | Catherine of Valois | Eldest surviving son of Philip of Taranto and the titular Latin Empress Catherine. Prince of Taranto and Achaea, after 1346 himself titular Latin Emperor. | [106] |
| Name | Tenure | Conferred by | Notes | Refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jacob Svetoslav | before 1261–1275/1277 | possiblyTsarConstantine Tikh | Powerful magnate and autonomous lord ofSofia, he was probably named despot by a Bulgarian ruler rather than a Nicaean emperor | [107] |
| George I Terter | 1278/1279–1292 | TsarIvan Asen III | Powerful magnate, he was given the title of despot along with the hand of the sister of Tsar Ivan Asen III to win him over in the face of the uprising ofIvaylo. George later deposed Ivan Asen and became Tsar himself. | [18] |
| Shishman of Vidin | 1270s/1280s — before 1308/1313 | Tsar George I Terter | Founder of theShishman dynasty and first semi-autonomous despot ofVidin | [108] |
| Aldimir | 1280s–1305 | probably by Tsar George I Terter | Younger brother of George I, he was raised to the rank of despot by him, and received (possibly after 1298) the region ofKran as anappanage ("Despotate of Kran") | |
| Michael Shishman of Bulgaria | before 1313–1322/1323 | TsarTheodore Svetoslav | Autonomous lord ofVidin, named despot at or soon after his fatherShishman of Vidin's death. Became Tsar of Bulgaria in 1322/1333. | [109] |
| Belaur | 1323 – c. 1331 | TsarMichael Shishman | Half-brother of Michael Shishman, he succeeded him as autonomous lord ofVidin with the rank of despot. He resisted the rule ofIvan Alexander and was forced to flee into exile | [110] |
| Sratsimir | unknown | unknown | Sratsimir was a magnate holding the territory ofKran with the title of Despot. He was the eponymous founder of theSratsimir dynasty. | |
| Ivan Alexander | By 1330 – 1371 | Tsar Michael Shishman | By 1330, the importance of the city resulted in the Asen family appointing John to governLovech, forming thedespotate of Lovech. | [111] |
| Mihail Shishman of Vidin | unknown | TsarIvan Alexander | Younger son of Tsar Michael Shishman, he probably succeeded Belaur as autonomous lord ofVidin with the rank of despot. | [108] |
| Dobrotitsa | after 1347 – 1386 | Tsar Ivan Alexander | Ruler of theDespotate of Dobruja |
| Name | Tenure | Conferred by | Notes | Refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jovan Oliver | 1334–1356 | Andronikos III Palaiologos | Autonomous Serbian magnate, named despot by Andronikos III after the Byzantine-Serbian peace agreement of 1334 | [112] |
| Simeon Uroš | 1345/1346–1363 | Stephen Uroš IV Dušan | Half-brother of Stephen Dušan, he was named despot probably after Dušan's coronation as emperor. Governor ofEpirus, he proclaimed himself Tsar in 1356 and tried to seize control of Serbia but failed. Ruler ofThessaly and most of Epirus from 1359 until his death c. 1370 | [113] |
| John Komnenos Asen | 1345/1346–1363 | Stephen Uroš IV Dušan | Brother-in-law of Stephen Dušan, he was named despot probably after Dušan's coronation as emperor. Ruler of thePrincipality of Valona until his death | [114] |
| Ivaniš | fl. 1348 | Stephen Uroš IV Dušan | Close relative of Stephen Dušan. Ruler of a region inToplica. | [115] |
| Dejan | After August 1355 | Stephen Uroš IV Dušan orStephen Uroš V | Brother-in-law of Stephen Dušan. Ruler of a region in theKumanovo region. | [116] |
| Gjin Bua Shpata | c. 1360/1365 – c. 1399/1400 | Simeon Uroš Palaiologos | Albanian clan leader, in the early 1360s he was recognized as Despot and ruler ofAetolia (the "Despotate of Angelokastron") by the titular Serbian Emperor and ruler of Thessaly Simeon Uroš. He wasde facto independent, and in 1374 annexed the Despotate of Arta and launched repeated unsuccessful attacks against Ioannina. | [117][118] |
| Peter Losha | c. 1360/1365–1374 | Simeon Uroš Palaiologos | Albanian clan leader, in the early 1360s he was recognized as Despot and ruler ofAcarnania (the "Despotate of Arta") by the titular Serbian Emperor and ruler of Thessaly Simeon Uroš. He wasde facto independent however, and attacked Thomas Preljubović at Ioannina, before coming to terms with him. He died of the plague in 1373/1374. | [119][120] |
| Vukašin Mrnjavčević | 1364–1365 | Stephen Uroš V | One of the most powerful Serbian magnates under Stephen Dušan, he was named despot in 1364 and then king and co-ruler by the emperor Stephen Uroš V. He becamede facto independent by 1368, and was killed by the Ottomans in theBattle of Maritsa in 1371. | [121] |
| Jovan Uglješa | 1365–1371 | Stephen Uroš V | Brother of Vukašin Mrnjavčević, he was named despot in succession to his brother and became ruler ofSerres alongside Dušan's widowHelena. From c. 1368 he was ade facto independent ruler until his death in the Battle of Maritsa. | [122] |
| Jovan Dragaš | 1365 – c. 1378 | Stephen Uroš V | Cousin of Stephen Uroš V and nephew of Stephen IV Dušan, with his brotherConstantine Dragaš he governedeastern domain from Kumanovo to Velbužd). From the Battle of Maritsa on he was an Ottoman vassal. | [123] |
| Serbian Despotate | ||||
| Stefan Lazarević | 1402–1427 | Manuel II Palaiologos | Ruler of Serbia as an Ottoman vassal. He was awarded the title of despot during a visit toConstantinople in 1402, and ruled the "Serbian Despotate" as an autonomous lord until his death in 1427. | [124] |
| Đurađ Branković | 1429–1456 | Manuel II Palaiologos | Successor ofStefan Lazarević as ruler of Serbia from 1427, he received the title of despot in 1429. An Ottoman vassal from 1428. | [125] |
| Lazar Branković | 1440s–1458 | Manuel II Palaiologos | Son and successor ofĐurađ Branković, he received the title of despot during his father's reign. | [126] |
| Stefan Branković | 1458–1459 | unknown | Son ofĐurađ Branković, ruler of Serbia. Deposed in favour of Stephen Tomašević. | |
| Stephen Tomašević | April–June 1459 | unknown | Prince of Bosnia, he became the last independent Serbian ruler after his marriage toHelena-Maria, the daughter ofLazar Branković. He assumed the title of despot (or perhaps was awarded it by Lazar's widow, the Byzantine princessHelena Palaiologina). His capitalSmederevo was conquered by the Ottomans a few months later. | [126] |
| Titular despots in exile underHungarian suzerainty | ||||
| Vuk Grgurević | 1471–1485 | Matthias Corvinus | Grandson ofĐurađ Branković | |
| Đorđe Branković | 1486–1496 | Matthias Corvinus | Son ofStefan Branković | |
| Jovan Branković | 1486–1502 | Vladislaus II | Son ofStefan Branković | |
| Ivaniš Berislavić | 1504–1514 | Vladislaus II | MarriedJovan Branković's widow,Jelena Jakšić | |
| Stefan Berislavić | 1514–1521 | Vladislaus II | Son ofIvaniš Berislavić | |
| Radič Božić | 1527–1528 | John Zápolya | ||
| Pavle Bakić | 1537 | Ferdinand I | ||
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)Byzantine Empire topics | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
