 | This articlerelies excessively onreferences toprimary sources. Please improve this article by addingsecondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: "Degenerated workers' state" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(June 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
InTrotskyist political theory, adegenerated workers' state is adictatorship of the proletariat in which theworking class' democratic control over the state has given way to control by abureaucraticclique. The term was developed byLeon Trotsky inThe Revolution Betrayed (1936)[1] and in other works.[2]
Trotsky argued that Russia was a genuine workers' state from the1917 October Revolution untilJoseph Stalin's consolidation of power.[3] Thebourgeoisie had beenpolitically overthrown by theworking class and the economic basis of that state lay incollective ownership of themeans of production. Contrary to the predictions of manysocialists such asLenin, the revolution failed to spread toGermany and other industrialWestern European countries although there were massive upheavals of working people in some of those countries and so the Soviet state began to degenerate.[4] That was worsened by the material and political degeneration of theRussian working class by theCivil War of 1917–1923.
After the death of Lenin in 1924, the ruling stratum of the Soviet Union, which consolidated around Stalin, was held to be a bureaucraticcaste, not a new ruling class, because its political control did not also extend to economic ownership. The theory that the Soviet Union was a degenerated workers' state is closely connected to Trotsky's call for apolitical revolution in the Soviet Union, as well as Trotsky's call to defend the Soviets fromcapitalist restoration.[5]
Trotsky summarised the more optimistic arguments within theInternational Left Opposition:
Perhaps this is a workers' state, in the last analysis, but there has not been left in it a vestige of thedictatorship of the proletariat. We have here a degenerated workers' state under the dictatorship of the bureaucracy.[6]
Trotsky always emphasised that the degenerated workers' state was not a new form of society but a transitional phase between capitalism and socialism (and closer to capitalism) that would inevitably collapse into one form or the other. He argued, however, that whether the downfall led to the restoration of workers' democracy or to capitalist restoration would depend on whether the movement to overthrow the dictatorship of the bureaucracy was led by the organised working class:
The inevitable collapse of the Stalinist political regime will lead to the establishment of Soviet democracy only in the event that the removal of Bonapartism comes as the conscious act of the proletarian vanguard. In all other cases, in place of Stalinism there could only come the fascist-capitalist counter-revolution.
The term "degenerated workers' state" commonly refers only to the Soviet Union. Trotskyists of theFourth International (founded in 1938) coined the term "deformed workers' state" to describe states (like theSoviet satellite states ofEastern Europe as well as China) based uponcollectivised means of production, but in which the working class never held direct political power. The two terms therefore label similar phenomena in that they both refer to states where the bourgeoisie no longer holds power, where the means of production has been socialised and where anunaccountable bureaucratic elite holds the political reins. They differ in the history of how their situation has arisen: through the bureaucratic degeneration of a genuine workers' democracy, as in the Soviet Union; or through the establishment of a deformed workers' state resulting from the overthrow of bourgeois rule and ownership by some force other than the mass action of the organised working class, such as by an invasion, a guerrilla army, or a military coup.[7]
Besides the supporters of the Soviet Union holding the belief that the state was a workers' state, the theory has been criticised from within the Trotskyist movement, and by other socialists critical of the Soviet Union. Among the disputed issues are the relationships between a workers' state (of any type) and aplanned economy. Some authorities tend to equate the two concepts, while others draw sharp distinctions between them.[citation needed]
Among Trotskyists, alternative but similar theories includestate capitalism andbureaucratic collectivism.
Another theoretical term used by some Trotskyists, most notablyTed Grant, to describe the dictatorial rule of bureaucracies in such "degenerated" or "deformed" workers' states isproletarian bonapartism.[6]
