This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Common logarithm" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(August 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |

Inmathematics, thecommon logarithm (aka "standard logarithm") is thelogarithm with base 10.[1] It is also known as thedecadic logarithm, thedecimal logarithm and theBriggsian logarithm. The name "Briggsian logarithm" is in honor of the British mathematicianHenry Briggs who conceived of and developed the values for the "common logarithm". Historically, the "common logarithm" was known by its Latin namelogarithmus decimalis[2] orlogarithmus decadis.[3]
The mathematical notation for using the common logarithm islog(x),[4]log10(x),[5] or sometimesLog(x) with a capitalL;[a] oncalculators, it is printed as "log",[6] but mathematicians usually meannatural logarithm (logarithm with basee ≈ 2.71828) rather than common logarithm when writing "log", since the natural logarithm is – contrary to what the name of the common logarithm implies – the most commonly used logarithm in pure math.[7]

Before the early 1970s, handheld electronic calculators were not available, andmechanical calculators capable of multiplication were bulky, expensive, and not widely available. Instead,tables of base-10 logarithms were used in science, engineering and navigation—when calculations required greater accuracy than could be achieved with aslide rule. By turning multiplication and division to addition and subtraction, use of logarithms avoided laborious and error-prone paper-and-pencil multiplications and divisions.[1] Because logarithms were so useful,tables of base-10 logarithms were given in appendices of many textbooks. Mathematical and navigation handbooks included tables of the logarithms oftrigonometric functions as well.[8] For the history of such tables, seelog table.
An important property of base-10 logarithms, which makes them so useful in calculations, is that the logarithm of numbers greater than 1 that differ by a factor of a power of 10 all have the samefractional part. The fractional part is known as themantissa.[b] Thus, log tables need only show the fractional part. Tables of common logarithms typically listed the mantissa, to four or five decimal places or more, of each number in a range, e.g. 1000 to 9999.
The integer part, called thecharacteristic, can be computed by simply counting how many places the decimal point must be moved, so that it is just to the right of the first significant digit. For example, the logarithm of 120 is given by the following calculation:
The last number (0.07918)—the fractional part or the mantissa of the common logarithm of 120—can be found in the table shown. The location of the decimal point in 120 tells us that the integer part of the common logarithm of 120, the characteristic, is 2.
Positive numbers less than 1 have negative logarithms. For example,
To avoid the need for separate tables to convert positive and negative logarithms back to their original numbers, one can express a negative logarithm as a negative integer characteristic plus a positive mantissa. To facilitate this, a special notation, calledbar notation, is used:
The bar over the characteristic indicates that it is negative, while the mantissa remains positive. When reading a number in bar notation out loud, the symbol is read as "barn", so that is read as "bar 2 point 07918...". An alternative convention is to express the logarithm modulo 10, in which case
with the actual value of the result of a calculation determined by knowledge of the reasonable range of the result.[c]
The following example uses the bar notation to calculate 0.012 × 0.85 = 0.0102:
* This step makes the mantissa between 0 and 1, so that itsantilog (10mantissa) can be looked up.
The following table shows how the same mantissa can be used for a range of numbers differing by powers of ten:
| Number | Logarithm | Characteristic | Mantissa | Combined form |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n = 5 × 10i | log10(n) | i = floor(log10(n)) | log10(n) −i | |
| 5 000 000 | 6.698 970... | 6 | 0.698 970... | 6.698 970... |
| 50 | 1.698 970... | 1 | 0.698 970... | 1.698 970... |
| 5 | 0.698 970... | 0 | 0.698 970... | 0.698 970... |
| 0.5 | −0.301 029... | −1 | 0.698 970... | 1.698 970... |
| 0.000 005 | −5.301 029... | −6 | 0.698 970... | 6.698 970... |
Note that the mantissa is common to all of the5 × 10i. This holds for any positivereal number because
Sincei is a constant, the mantissa comes from, which is constant for given. This allows atable of logarithms to include only one entry for each mantissa. In the example of5 × 10i, 0.698 970 (004 336 018 ...) will be listed once indexed by 5 (or 0.5, or 500, etc.).
Common logarithms are sometimes also called "Briggsian logarithms" afterHenry Briggs, a 17th century British mathematician. In 1616 and 1617, Briggs visitedJohn Napier atEdinburgh, the inventor of what are now called natural (base-e) logarithms, in order to suggest a change to Napier's logarithms. During these conferences, the alteration proposed by Briggs was agreed upon; and after his return from his second visit, he published the firstchiliad of his logarithms.
Because base-10 logarithms were most useful for computations, engineers generally simply wrote "log(x)" when they meantlog10(x). Mathematicians, on the other hand, wrote "log(x)" when they meantloge(x) for the natural logarithm. Today, both notations are found. Since hand-held electronic calculators are designed by engineers rather than mathematicians, it became customary that they follow engineers' notation. So the notation, according to which one writes "ln(x)" when the natural logarithm is intended, may have been further popularized by the very invention that made the use of "common logarithms" far less common, electronic calculators.
To mitigate the ambiguity, theISO 80000 specification recommends thatloge(x) should beln(x), whilelog10(x) should be writtenlg(x), which unfortunately is used for thebase-2 logarithm by CLRS and Sedgwick andThe Chicago Manual of Style.[10][11][12]

The numerical value for logarithm to the base 10 can be calculated with the following identities:[5]
using logarithms of any available base
as procedures exist for determining the numerical value forlogarithm basee (seeNatural logarithm § Efficient computation) andlogarithm base 2 (seeAlgorithms for computing binary logarithms).
The derivative of a logarithm with a baseb is such that[13]
, so.