Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

2,5-Dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromDOM (drug))
Pharmaceutical compound
DOM
Clinical data
Other names2,5-Dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine; 4-Methyl-2,5-dimethoxyamphetamine; 2,5-Dimethoxy-4-methyl-α-methylphenethylamine; Des-oxy-methyl; DOM; DMMTA; α-Me-2C-D; STP; Serenity, Tranquility, and Peace; Super Terrific Psychedelic; Stop The Police; Too Stupid to Puke;[1] K-61,082[2]
Drug classSerotonergic psychedelic;Hallucinogen;Serotonin5-HT2 receptoragonist
Legal status
Legal status
Identifiers
  • 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylphenyl)propan-2-amine
CAS Number
  • 15588-95-1 checkY
    43061-13-8 ((R)-DOM)
    43061-14-9 ((S)-DOM)
PubChemCID
ChemSpider
UNII
KEGG
ChEMBL
CompTox Dashboard(EPA)
Chemical and physical data
FormulaC12H19NO2
Molar mass209.289 g·mol−1
3D model (JSmol)
Melting point61 °C (142 °F)
  • O(c1cc(c(OC)cc1C[C@H](N)C)C)C
  • InChI=1S/C12H19NO2/c1-8-5-12(15-4)10(6-9(2)13)7-11(8)14-3/h5,7,9H,6,13H2,1-4H3/t9-/m1/s1
  • Key:NTJQREUGJKIARY-SECBINFHSA-N checkY
  (verify)

2,5-Dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM), also known asSTP (standing for "Serenity, Tranquility, and Peace" and/or other phrases), is apsychedelicdrug of thephenethylamine,amphetamine, andDOx families.[4][5][1][6][7] It is generally takenorally.[5][1][6]

DOM was firstsynthesized byAlexander Shulgin, and later described in his bookPiHKAL: A Chemical Love Story (1991).[1] It is classified as aSchedule Icontrolled substance in theUnited States, and is similarly controlled in other parts of the world.[1] Internationally, it is a Schedule I drug under theConvention on Psychotropic Substances.[8]

Use and effects

[edit]

Effects of this drug include substantial perceptual changes such asblurred vision, multiple images, vibration of objects, visual alterations, distorted shapes, enhancement of details,slowed passage of time, increased sexual drive and pleasure, and increased contrasts. It may causemystical experiences and changes inconsciousness. It may also causepupillary dilation and a rise insystolic blood pressure.[9]

The effects of DOM were assessed inclinical studies in the late 1960s and early 1970s and by other researchers.[2][7][10][11][12] At low doses, such as 1 to 4 mg, DOM produces effects includingstimulation,euphoria, enhancedself-awareness, and milddose-dependentperceptual disturbances.[2] At higher doses, of above 5 to 7 mg, DOM produces psychedelic effects.[2]

Side effects

[edit]

Very little is known about thetoxicity of DOM.

Interactions

[edit]
See also:Psychedelic drug § Interactions, andTrip killer § Serotonergic psychedelic antidotes

Pharmacology

[edit]

Pharmacodynamics

[edit]

Actions

[edit]
DOM activities
TargetAffinity (Ki, nM)
5-HT1A3,656–14,200 (Ki)
12,800–13,900 (EC50Tooltip half-maximal effective concentration)
54–74% (EmaxTooltip maximal efficacy)
5-HT1B>10,000
5-HT1D209
5-HT1E3,542
5-HT1FND
5-HT2A2.1–507 (Ki)
1.1–40 (EC50)
44–132% (
Emax)
5-HT2B12–41 (Ki)
128–145 (EC50)
85% (
Emax)
5-HT2C19–3,980 (Ki)
0.23–423 (EC50)
81–119% (
Emax)
5-HT3>10,000
5-HT4ND
5-HT5A>10,000
5-HT68,155
5-HT71,591
α1A3,219
α1B>10,000
α1DND
α2A580
α2B874
α2C921
β1>10,000
β249
D1D5>10,000
H1H4>10,000
M1,M2,M5>10,000
M3,M4ND
TAAR1>10,000 (EC50)
I1>10,000
σ1,σ2>10,000
SERTTooltip Serotonin transporter>100,000 (Ki)
>100,000 (IC50Tooltip half-maximal inhibitory concentration)
>100,000 (EC50)
NETTooltip Norepinephrine transporter>100,000 (Ki)
>70,000 (IC50)
>100,000 (
EC50)
DATTooltip Dopamine transporter>100,000 (Ki)
64,000 (IC50)
>42,000 (
EC50)
MAO-ATooltip Monoamine oxidase A24,000 (IC50) (rat)
MAO-BTooltip Monoamine oxidase B>100,000 (IC50) (rat)
Notes: The smaller the value, the more avidly the drug binds to the site. All proteins are human unless otherwise specified.Refs:[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]

DOM acts as aselectiveserotonin5-HT2A,5-HT2B, and5-HT2C receptorfull agonist.[16][15][17][18] Its psychedelic effects are mediated by itsagonistic properties at the 5-HT2A receptor. Due to its selectivity, DOM is often used inscientific research in studies of the5-HT2 receptor subfamily. DOM is achiral molecule, andR-(−)-DOM is the more activeenantiomer, functioning as a potent agonist of these receptors.[25]

The drug is inactive as a humantrace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonist but is an agonist of therhesus monkey TAAR1.[19] DOM is inactive as amonoamine reuptake inhibitor andreleasing agent.[18] It is a very weakmonoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI), specifically ofmonoamine oxidase A (MAO-A), whereas it was inactive atmonoamine oxidase B (MAO-B).[23][24]

Effects

[edit]

DOM produces thehead-twitch response in rodents, a behavioral proxy ofpsychedelic-like effects.[26] It also substitutes forLSD in rodentdrug discrimination tests.[26] DOM is widely used as a psychedelic training drug in rodent drug discrimination assays and many otherserotonergic psychedelics have been shown to generalize to it.[26]

In contrast toamphetamines like(−)-cathinone but similarly tomescaline, DOM has shown nostimulant-like orreinforcing effects in rhesus monkeys.[27][28][29][30] Conversely however,DOC has shown reinforcing effects, includingconditioned place preference (CPP) andself-administration, in rodents similarly tomethamphetamine.[31] This is analogous to other findings in which various2C andNBOMedrugs have been found to producedopaminergic elevations and reinforcing effects in rodents.[32][33][34][35][36][37][38]

Pharmacokinetics

[edit]

According toAlexander Shulgin, the effects of DOM typically last 14 to 20 hours, though other clinical trials indicate a duration of 7 to 8 hours.[9]

Metabolites of DOM like 2-O-desmethyl-DOM (2-DM-DOM) and 5-O-desmethyl-DOM (5-DM-DOM) arepharmacologically active and showpsychedelic-like effects inanimal studies.[39][40] They might contribute to the delayedonset and longduration of DOM.[40][39] However, these metabolites might also producemetabolism-dependentneurotoxicity.[39]

Chemistry

[edit]
Sample of DOM.

DOM, also known as 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine or as 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methyl-α-methylphenethylamine, is asubstituted phenethylamine andamphetamine and is a member of theDOx group of drugs.[4][5][6][7] It isstructurally related to thenaturally occurring phenethylamine psychedelicmescaline (3,4,5-trimethoxyphenethylamine).[7][41]

Analogues

[edit]
See also:DOx (psychedelics) andPiHKAL § Ten classic ladies

Analogues of DOM include other DOx drugs such asDOET,DOB,DOI,DOC, andTMA, among others.[7] The α-desmethyl or phenethylamine analogue of DOM is2C-D.[4][5]Ariadne is the α-ethyl orphenylisobutylamine analogue of DOM.[42][5]

Chemical structures of some DOM variants

The 2,6-dimethoxy positional isomer of DOM, known asΨ-DOM, is also mentioned inPiHKAL as being active, as is the α-ethyl homologueAriadne. Analogues where the methoxy groups at the 2,5- positions of the aromatic ring have been altered have also been synthesised and tested as part of an effort to identify the binding mode of DOM at the serotonin5-HT2A receptor. Both the 2- and 5- O-desmethyl derivatives 2-DM-DOM and 5-DM-DOM, and the 2- and 5- ethyl analogues 2-Et-DOM and 5-Et-DOM, have been tested, but in all cases were significantly less potent than the corresponding methoxy compound, showing the importance of the oxygen lone pairs in 5-HT2A binding.[40][43]

History

[edit]

DOM was first synthesized and tested in 1963 byAlexander Shulgin, who was investigating the effect of 4-position substitutions on psychedelic amphetamines.[1][5]

In mid-1967, tablets containing 20 mg (later 10 mg) of DOM were widely distributed in theHaight-Ashbury District ofSan Francisco under the name of STP, having been manufactured by underground chemistsOwsley Stanley andTim Scully.[1] This short-lived appearance of DOM on theblack market proved disastrous for several reasons.[1] First, the tablets contained an excessively high dose of the chemical.[1] This, combined with DOM's slowonset of action (which encouraged some users, familiar with drugs that have quicker onsets, such asLSD, to re-dose) and its remarkably longduration, caused many users topanic and sent some to theemergency room.[1] Second, treatment of suchoverdoses was complicated by the fact that no one at the time knew that the tablets called STP were, in fact, DOM, and there was no effectiveantidote.[1]

Society and culture

[edit]

Names

[edit]

The nameDOM is an acronym of the code name "des-oxy-methyl" coined by the drug's inventorAlexander Shulgin.[1]

Legal status

[edit]

Australia

[edit]

DOM is schedule 9 under the AustraliaPoisons standard.[44] A schedule 9 substance is a "Substances which may be abused or misused, the manufacture, possession, sale or use of which should be prohibited by law except when required for medical or scientific research, or for analytical, teaching or training purposes with approval of Commonwealth and/or State or Territory Health Authorities."[44]

Canada

[edit]

Listed as aSchedule 1, as it is an analogue of amphetamine.

United Kingdom

[edit]

DOM is aClass A drug in the United Kingdom under theMisuse of Drugs Act 1971.

United States

[edit]

DOM is Schedule I in the United States. This means it is illegal to manufacture, buy, possess, or distribute (make, trade, own or give) without a DEA license.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abcdefghijklBaggott MJ (1 October 2023)."Learning about STP: A Forgotten Psychedelic from the Summer of Love"(PDF).History of Pharmacy and Pharmaceuticals.65 (1):93–116.doi:10.3368/hopp.65.1.93.ISSN 2694-3034. Retrieved26 January 2025.
  2. ^abcdTrout K, Daley PF (December 2024)."The origin of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM, STP)"(PDF).Drug Test Anal.16 (12):1496–1508.doi:10.1002/dta.3667.PMID 38419183.
  3. ^Anvisa (2023-07-24)."RDC Nº 804 - Listas de Substâncias Entorpecentes, Psicotrópicas, Precursoras e Outras sob Controle Especial" [Collegiate Board Resolution No. 804 - Lists of Narcotic, Psychotropic, Precursor, and Other Substances under Special Control] (in Brazilian Portuguese).Diário Oficial da União (published 2023-07-25).Archived from the original on 2023-08-27. Retrieved2023-08-27.
  4. ^abcShulgin A, Manning T, Daley PF (2011)."#60. DOM".The Shulgin Index, Volume One: Psychedelic Phenethylamines and Related Compounds. Vol. 1. Berkeley, CA: Transform Press. pp. 118–129.ISBN 978-0-9630096-3-0.OCLC 709667010.
  5. ^abcdefAlexander T. Shulgin;Ann Shulgin (1991)."#68 DOM; STP; 2,5-DIMETHOXY-4-METHYLAMPHETAMINE".PiHKAL: A Chemical Love Story (1st ed.). Berkeley, CA: Transform Press. pp. 637–642.ISBN 978-0-9630096-0-9.OCLC 25627628.
  6. ^abcWills B, Erickson T (9 March 2012). "Psychoactive Phenethylamine, Piperazine, and Pyrrolidinophenone Derivatives". In Barceloux DG (ed.).Medical Toxicology of Drug Abuse: Synthesized Chemicals and Psychoactive Plants. Wiley. pp. 156–192.doi:10.1002/9781118105955.ch10.ISBN 978-0-471-72760-6.
  7. ^abcdeShulgin AT (1978)."Psychotomimetic Drugs: Structure-Activity Relationships". In Iversen LL, Iversen SD, Snyder SH (eds.).Stimulants. Boston, MA: Springer US. pp. 243–333.doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0510-2_6.ISBN 978-1-4757-0512-6.
  8. ^"Green List: List of Psychotropic Substances Under International Control"(PDF) (23rd ed.).International Narcotics Control Board. August 2003. p. 4. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 19 December 2013. Retrieved22 February 2014.
  9. ^abSnyder, Solomon H.; Louis Faillace & Leo Hollister (3 November 1967). "2,5-Dimethoxy-4-methyl-amphetamine (STP): A New Hallucinogenic Drug".Science.158 (3801):669–670.Bibcode:1967Sci...158..669S.doi:10.1126/science.158.3801.669.PMID 4860952.S2CID 24065654.
  10. ^Snyder SH, Faillace L, Hollister L (November 1967). "2,5-dimethoxy-4-methyl-amphetamine (STP): a new hallucinogenic drug".Science.158 (3801):669–670.Bibcode:1967Sci...158..669S.doi:10.1126/science.158.3801.669.PMID 4860952.S2CID 24065654.
  11. ^Snyder SH, Faillace LA, Weingartner H (September 1968). "DOM (STP), a new hallucinogenic drug, and DOET: effects in normal subjects".Am J Psychiatry.125 (3):113–120.doi:10.1176/ajp.125.3.357.PMID 4385937.
  12. ^Weingartner H, Snyder SH, Faillace LA (1971). "DOM (STP), a new hallucinogenic drug: specific perceptual changes".J Clin Pharmacol New Drugs.11 (2):103–111.doi:10.1177/009127007101100205.PMID 5206471.
  13. ^"PDSP Database".UNC (in Zulu). Retrieved1 February 2025.
  14. ^Liu, Tiqing."BindingDB BDBM50005265 (+/-)2-(2,5-Dimethoxy-4-methyl-phenyl)-1-methyl-ethylamine::(-)2-(2,5-Dimethoxy-4-methyl-phenyl)-1-methyl-ethylamine::(Rec)2-(2,5-Dimethoxy-4-methyl-phenyl)-1-methyl-ethylamine; compound with 2-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-methyl-phenyl)-1-methyl-ethylamine::2-(2,5-Dimethoxy-4-methyl-phenyl)-1-methyl-ethylamine::2-(2,5-Dimethoxy-4-methyl-phenyl)-1-methyl-ethylamine((R)-(-)-DOM)::2-(2,5-Dimethoxy-4-methyl-phenyl)-1-methyl-ethylamine(DOM)::CHEMBL8600::DOM::DOM,R(-)::Racemic DOM".BindingDB. Retrieved1 February 2025.
  15. ^abRay TS (February 2010)."Psychedelics and the human receptorome".PLOS ONE.5 (2) e9019.Bibcode:2010PLoSO...5.9019R.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009019.PMC 2814854.PMID 20126400.
  16. ^abLuethi D, Rudin D, Hoener MC, Liechti ME (2022)."Monoamine Receptor and Transporter Interaction Profiles of 4-Alkyl-Substituted 2,5-Dimethoxyamphetamines".The FASEB Journal.36 (S1) fasebj.2022.36.S1.R2691.doi:10.1096/fasebj.2022.36.S1.R2691.ISSN 0892-6638.
  17. ^abEshleman AJ, Forster MJ, Wolfrum KM, Johnson RA, Janowsky A, Gatch MB (March 2014)."Behavioral and neurochemical pharmacology of six psychoactive substituted phenethylamines: mouse locomotion, rat drug discrimination and in vitro receptor and transporter binding and function".Psychopharmacology (Berl).231 (5):875–888.doi:10.1007/s00213-013-3303-6.PMC 3945162.PMID 24142203.
  18. ^abcEshleman AJ, Wolfrum KM, Reed JF, Kim SO, Johnson RA, Janowsky A (December 2018)."Neurochemical pharmacology of psychoactive substituted N-benzylphenethylamines: High potency agonists at 5-HT2A receptors".Biochem Pharmacol.158:27–34.doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2018.09.024.PMC 6298744.PMID 30261175.
  19. ^abLewin AH, Miller GM, Gilmour B (December 2011)."Trace amine-associated receptor 1 is a stereoselective binding site for compounds in the amphetamine class".Bioorg Med Chem.19 (23):7044–7048.doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2011.10.007.PMC 3236098.PMID 22037049.
  20. ^Åstrand A, Guerrieri D, Vikingsson S, Kronstrand R, Green H (December 2020)."In vitro characterization of new psychoactive substances at the μ-opioid, CB1, 5HT1A, and 5-HT2A receptors-On-target receptor potency and efficacy, and off-target effects".Forensic Science International.317 110553.doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110553.PMID 33160102.
  21. ^van Wijngaarden I, Soudijn W (1997). "5-HT2A, 5-HT2B and 5-HT2C receptor ligands".Pharmacochemistry Library. Vol. 27. Elsevier. pp. 161–197.doi:10.1016/s0165-7208(97)80013-x.ISBN 978-0-444-82041-9.
  22. ^Acuña-Castillo C, Villalobos C, Moya PR, Sáez P, Cassels BK, Huidobro-Toro JP (June 2002)."Differences in potency and efficacy of a series of phenylisopropylamine/phenylethylamine pairs at 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(2C) receptors".Br J Pharmacol.136 (4):510–519.doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0704747.PMC 1573376.PMID 12055129.
  23. ^abReyes-Parada M, Iturriaga-Vasquez P, Cassels BK (2019)."Amphetamine Derivatives as Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors".Front Pharmacol.10 1590.doi:10.3389/fphar.2019.01590.PMC 6989591.PMID 32038257.
  24. ^abScorza MC, Carrau C, Silveira R, Zapata-Torres G, Cassels BK, Reyes-Parada M (December 1997)."Monoamine oxidase inhibitory properties of some methoxylated and alkylthio amphetamine derivatives: structure-activity relationships".Biochem Pharmacol.54 (12):1361–1369.doi:10.1016/s0006-2952(97)00405-x.PMID 9393679.
  25. ^Sanders-Bush, E; Burris, KD; Knoth, K (September 1988). "Lysergic acid diethylamide and 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine are partial agonists at serotonin receptors linked to phosphoinositide hydrolysis".The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.246 (3):924–928.doi:10.1016/S0022-3565(25)22189-9.PMID 2843634.
  26. ^abcHalberstadt AL, Chatha M, Klein AK, Wallach J, Brandt SD (May 2020)."Correlation between the potency of hallucinogens in the mouse head-twitch response assay and their behavioral and subjective effects in other species"(PDF).Neuropharmacology.167 107933.doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2019.107933.PMC 9191653.PMID 31917152.
  27. ^Fantegrossi WE, Murnane KS, Reissig CJ (January 2008)."The behavioral pharmacology of hallucinogens".Biochem Pharmacol.75 (1):17–33.doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2007.07.018.PMC 2247373.PMID 17977517.Despite the reasonably constant recreational use of hallucinogens since at least the early 1970s [44], the reinforcing effects of hallucinogens have not been widely investigated in laboratory animals. Indeed, one of the earliest studies on the reinforcing effects of drugs using the intravenous self-administration procedure in rhesus monkeys found that no animal initiated self-injection of mescaline either spontaneously or after one month of programmed administration [45]. Likewise, the phenethylamine hallucinogen 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM) was not effective in maintaining self-administration in rhesus monkeys [46]. Nevertheless, the hallucinogen-like phenethylamine 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) has been shown to act as a reinforcer in intravenous self-administration paradigms in baboons [47], rhesus monkeys [48 – 50], rats [51] and mice [52].
  28. ^Canal CE, Murnane KS (January 2017)."The serotonin 5-HT2C receptor and the non-addictive nature of classic hallucinogens".J Psychopharmacol.31 (1):127–143.doi:10.1177/0269881116677104.PMC 5445387.PMID 27903793.One of the earliest studies on the reinforcing effects of drugs using the intravenous self-administration procedure in rhesus monkeys found that no animal initiated self-injection of mescaline either spontaneously or after one month of programmed administration, [...] (Deneau et al., 1969). The lack of mescaline self-administration stood in contrast to positive findings of self-administration of morphine, codeine, cocaine, amphetamine, pentobarbital, ethanol, and caffeine. A subsequent study with rhesus monkeys using 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM; Yanagita, 1986) provided similar results as the mescaline study. These findings have withstood the test of time, as the primary literature is virtually devoid of any accounts of self-administration of [classical hallucinogens (CH)], suggesting that there are very limited conditions under which laboratory animals voluntarily consume CH.
  29. ^Yanagita T (June 1986). "Intravenous self-administration of (−)-cathinone and 2-amino-1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-methyl)phenylpropane in rhesus monkeys".Drug Alcohol Depend.17 (2–3):135–141.doi:10.1016/0376-8716(86)90004-9.PMID 3743404.
  30. ^Maguire DR (October 2024)."Evaluation of potential punishing effects of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM) in rhesus monkeys responding under a choice procedure".Behav Pharmacol.35 (7):378–385.doi:10.1097/FBP.0000000000000787.PMC 11398979.PMID 39052019.
  31. ^Cha HJ, Jeon SY, Jang HJ, Shin J, Kim YH, Suh SK (May 2018). "Rewarding and reinforcing effects of 4-chloro-2,5-dimethoxyamphetamine and AH-7921 in rodents".Neurosci Lett.676:66–70.doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2018.04.009.PMID 29626650.
  32. ^Gil-Martins E, Barbosa DJ, Borges F, Remião F, Silva R (June 2025)."Toxicodynamic insights of 2C and NBOMe drugs - Is there abuse potential?".Toxicol Rep.14 101890.Bibcode:2025ToxR...1401890G.doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2025.101890.PMC 11762925.PMID 39867514.
  33. ^Kim YJ, Ma SX, Hur KH, Lee Y, Ko YH, Lee BR, Kim SK, Sung SJ, Kim KM, Kim HC, Lee SY, Jang CG (April 2021). "New designer phenethylamines 2C-C and 2C-P have abuse potential and induce neurotoxicity in rodents".Arch Toxicol.95 (4):1413–1429.Bibcode:2021ArTox..95.1413K.doi:10.1007/s00204-021-02980-x.PMID 33515270.
  34. ^Custodio RJ, Sayson LV, Botanas CJ, Abiero A, You KY, Kim M, Lee HJ, Yoo SY, Lee KW, Lee YS, Seo JW, Ryu IS, Kim HJ, Cheong JH (November 2020). "25B-NBOMe, a novel N-2-methoxybenzyl-phenethylamine (NBOMe) derivative, may induce rewarding and reinforcing effects via a dopaminergic mechanism: Evidence of abuse potential".Addict Biol.25 (6) e12850.doi:10.1111/adb.12850.PMID 31749223.
  35. ^Seo JY, Hur KH, Ko YH, Kim K, Lee BR, Kim YJ, Kim SK, Kim SE, Lee YS, Kim HC, Lee SY, Jang CG (October 2019). "A novel designer drug, 25N-NBOMe, exhibits abuse potential via the dopaminergic system in rodents".Brain Res Bull.152:19–26.doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2019.07.002.PMID 31279579.
  36. ^Jo C, Joo H, Youn DH, Kim JM, Hong YK, Lim NY, Kim KS, Park SJ, Choi SO (November 2022)."Rewarding and Reinforcing Effects of 25H-NBOMe in Rodents".Brain Sci.12 (11): 1490.doi:10.3390/brainsci12111490.PMC 9688077.PMID 36358416.
  37. ^Lee JG, Hur KH, Hwang SB, Lee S, Lee SY, Jang CG (August 2023). "Designer Drug, 25D-NBOMe, Has Reinforcing and Rewarding Effects through Change of a Dopaminergic Neurochemical System".ACS Chem Neurosci.14 (15):2658–2666.doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.3c00196.PMID 37463338.
  38. ^Kim YJ, Kook WA, Ma SX, Lee BR, Ko YH, Kim SK, Lee Y, Lee JG, Lee S, Kim KM, Lee SY, Jang CG (April 2024). "The novel psychoactive substance 25E-NBOMe induces reward-related behaviors via dopamine D1 receptor signaling in male rodents".Arch Pharm Res.47 (4):360–376.doi:10.1007/s12272-024-01491-4.PMID 38551761.
  39. ^abcGlennon RA (April 2017)."The 2014 Philip S. Portoghese Medicinal Chemistry Lectureship: The "Phenylalkylaminome" with a Focus on Selected Drugs of Abuse".J Med Chem.60 (7):2605–2628.doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b00085.PMC 5824997.PMID 28244748.
  40. ^abcEckler JR, Chang-Fong J, Rabin RA, Smith C, Teitler M, Glennon RA, Winter JC (July 2003). "Behavioral characterization of 2-O-desmethyl and 5-O-desmethyl metabolites of the phenylethylamine hallucinogen DOM".Pharmacol Biochem Behav.75 (4):845–852.doi:10.1016/s0091-3057(03)00159-x.PMID 12957227.
  41. ^Hassan Z, Bosch OG, Singh D, Narayanan S, Kasinather BV, Seifritz E, Kornhuber J, Quednow BB, Müller CP (2017)."Novel Psychoactive Substances-Recent Progress on Neuropharmacological Mechanisms of Action for Selected Drugs".Front Psychiatry.8 152.doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00152.PMC 5563308.PMID 28868040.The next, even though less accidental, producer of NPS hallucinogens was Alexander T. Shulgin, who synthesized hundreds of novel hallucinogenic tryptamines and phenylethylamines in his home laboratory. He described the synthesis of these compounds and also their psychotomimetic effects experienced in self-experiments in detail in his books PIHKAL and TIHKAL (199, 200). He created several dimethoxy-substituted phenylethylamines, such as DOM, 2,5-dimethoxy-4-bromoamphetamine (DOB), 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine (DOI), and 2,5-dimethoxy-4-ethylamphetamine (DOET), which all display strong hallucinogenic properties. These drugs usually have much longer durations of action (12–30 h) and are much more potent agonists at 5-HT2A-Rs (50- to 175-fold) compared to their related phenylethylamine derivative mescaline (duration of action: 4–8 h) (189, 199, 200).
  42. ^Cunningham MJ, Bock HA, Serrano IC, Bechand B, Vidyadhara DJ, Bonniwell EM, Lankri D, Duggan P, Nazarova AL, Cao AB, Calkins MM, Khirsariya P, Hwu C, Katritch V, Chandra SS, McCorvy JD, Sames D (January 2023)."Pharmacological Mechanism of the Non-hallucinogenic 5-HT2A Agonist Ariadne and Analogs".ACS Chemical Neuroscience.14 (1):119–135.doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.2c00597.PMC 10147382.PMID 36521179.
  43. ^Braden, Michael Robert (May 2007).Towards a Biophysical Basis of Hallucinogen Action (Thesis). Purdue University.OCLC 703618147. Retrieved28 February 2012.
  44. ^abPoison Standardhttps://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2015L01534/Html/Text#_Toc420496379Archived 2015-12-22 at theWayback Machine

External links

[edit]
Tryptamines
No ring subs.
4-Hydroxytryptamines
5-Hydroxytryptamines
5-Methoxytryptamines
Other ring subs.
α-Alkyltryptamines
Others
Cyclized
Bioisosteres
Phenethylamines
Scalines
2C-x
3C-x
DOx
4C-x
Ψ-PEA
MDxx
FLY
25x-NB (NBOMes)
Others
Cyclized
Lysergamides
  • Bioisosteres:JRT
Others
Natural sources
5-HT1
5-HT1A
5-HT1B
5-HT1D
5-HT1E
5-HT1F
5-HT2
5-HT2A
5-HT2B
5-HT2C
5-HT37
5-HT3
5-HT4
5-HT5A
5-HT6
5-HT7
TAAR1Tooltip Trace amine-associated receptor 1
Agonists
Endogenous
Exogenous
Antagonists
Inverse agonists
TAAR5Tooltip Trace amine-associated receptor 5
Agonists
Inverse agonists
Notes: (1) TAAR1 activity of ligands varies significantly between species. Some agents that are TAAR1 ligands in some species are not in other species. This navbox includes all TAAR1 ligands regardless of species. (2) See the individual pages for references, as well as theList of trace amines,TAAR, andTAAR1 pages.
See also:Receptor/signaling modulators
Phenethylamines
Amphetamines
Phentermines
Cathinones
Phenylisobutylamines
(and further-extended)
Catecholamines
(and close relatives)
Cyclized
phenethylamines
Phenylalkylpyrrolidines
2-Benzylpiperidines
(phenidates)
Phenylmorpholines
(phenmetrazines)
Phenyloxazolamines
(aminorexes)
Isoquinolines and
tetrahydroisoquinolines
2-Aminoindanes
2-Aminotetralins
Others / unsorted
Related compounds
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2,5-Dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine&oldid=1323692358"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp