Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Cumdach

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Medieval Irish case for a reliquary or book

Cumdach for theStowe Missal, 11th century
TheSoiscél Molaisse, 11th century

Acumdach (Old Irish pronunciation:[ˈkuṽdax], in Irish "cover"[1]) orbook shrine is an elaborate ornamented metalreliquary box or case used to holdEarly Medieval Irish manuscripts orrelics.[2] They are typically later than the book they contain, often by several centuries.[3] In most surviving examples, the book comes from the peak age ofIrish monasticism before 800, and the extant cumdachs date from after 1000, although it is clear the form dates from considerably earlier. The majority are of Irish origin, with most surviving examples held by theNational Museum of Ireland (NMI).

The usual form is a design based on a cross on the main face, with the use of large gems ofrock crystal or othersemi-precious stones, leaving the spaces between the arms of the cross for more varied decoration. Several were carried on a metal chain or leather cord, often worn off the belt, or suspended around the neck, placing them next to the heart and thus offering spiritual and perhaps medical benefits (the same was done with theSt Cuthbert Gospel in a leather bag in medievalDurham). They were also used to bring healing to the sick or dying, or more formally, as witness contracts. Many had hereditary laykeepers from among the chiefly families who had formed links with monasteries.[4]

Only five early examples ofcumdach survive, including those of theBook of Dimma andBook of Mulling atTrinity College Dublin, and theCathach of St. Columba andStowe Missal. Of theSt. Molaise Shrine, only the Gospels are extant; the casing is lost, but more often the reverse is the case. Other books such as theBook of Kells,Book of Armagh andBook of Durrow are known to have once had eithercumdachs ortreasure bindings or both, but as they contained valuable precious metals they were a natural target for looters and thieves.

Characteristics and formats

[edit]
Side-view of the shrine of theStowe Missal, mid-11th century

The format and function ofcumdachs may derive from book caskets used byearly Christian Romans. Both types were intended to protect sacred text or relics, and it is plausible that Irish monasteries would seek to emulate the prestige and, according to the Irish art historian Rachel Moss, "splendour of Romanliturgical ceremonies".[5] The Irish church emphasised relics that were thought to be objects frequently used by monastic saints, rather than the body parts preferred by most of the church, although these were also kept in local versions of the house-shapedchasse form, such as the ScottishMonymusk Reliquary.[6] Another Irish speciality was thebell-shrine, encasing the handbells used to summon the community to services or meals, and one of the earliest reliquaries enshrined the bell of an unknown saint, and was probably worn as a test of truthfulness and to cure illness. It probably dates to the 8th century and was found in apeat bog nearMoylough,County Sligo.[7]

As the sample size of 8 to 10 surviving examples is so small (presumably many such works were lost, mostly plundered for their precious metal or stones) they cannot be classified typologically. Their shared characteristics include that they are sealed, metal cases built to protect earlier objects of veneration originally placed in a timber core typically built fromYew wood or (less commonly) fromoak.[8] All of the later refurbishments were seem to have been commissioned by ambitious clergy members, and the work carried out by single metal-workers and their workshops. In the majority of instances, the master metal worker left an inscribed signature and date of completion, some of which contain wording that hints at their artistic motivations.[9]

Reverse of the Shrine of the Cathach

All extantcumdachs' contain afrontispiece containing a central cross, a reverse with repetitiveopenwork patterns consisting of two highly contrasted colours (such as red and black), and sides containing interlace patterns and inscriptions.[5] Distinguishing factors include size (indicating the originally intended function as for example as private fixed shrines pocketbooks, or objects to be worn over the shoulder or from belts), and their later use.[5] TheShrine of Miosach retains its original chain used to carry it around, while the Soiscél Molaisse and Lough Kinsalen Shrine have fittings that once held leather straps, assumed to have held the objects in place during processional ceremonies.[10]

They are to be distinguished from the metalworktreasure bindings that probably covered most grand liturgical books of the period—the theft and loss of that covering theBook of Kells (if it was not acumdach alone) is recorded. However, the designs may well have been very similar; the best surviving Insular example, the lower cover of theLindau Gospels (c. 880) in theMorgan Library in New York, is also centred on a large cross, surrounded by interlace panels.[11] Treasure bindings were metalwork assemblies tacked onto the wooden boards of a conventionalbookbinding, so essentially the same technically as the faces of manycumdachs, which are also attached with tacks to a core wooden box.

Commission and production

[edit]

Historians are generally confident in identifying who commissioned the shrines, and their providence. Exceptions include the Book of Durrow and the Stow Missal.[12] Inscriptions on two examples (Durrow and Stowe) indicate they were for aKing of Ireland.[13]

Almost nothing is known of the metal workers who produced them. A number contain inscriptions that can be read as signatures, but that is the extent of their historical record, as even first-rank craftsmen of the time were not mentioned in annuals and were not given obituaries when they died. As craftsmen were not given a high social status, it seems many were illiterate. Some of the signatures are unclear, with instances where the scribe was tasked with writing in Latin, but did not understand how to formulate the language.[14]

Function

[edit]

Cumdachs basic utilitarian functions were as practical protective covers for their manuscript or relic, and to provide, sometimes portable, private centres of devotion, or were of liturgical use.[15] The majority were intended to hold by then centuries older manuscripts, in instanced assumed to be written by major saints, such as Patrick, or legendary local monastery founders who had died 100s of years before the actual date of the manuscript. For this reason, many of the very early manuscripts owe their survival to their later, active status as relics.[16] Most other early medieval Irish manuscripts were stored away in secure stone buildings, but were over the years sold, stolen or plundered, and thus lost.[17]

The shrines were used during both ecclesiastical and secular ceremonies, such as granting insignia of office, swearing ofoaths or signing treaties.[5] The books of Dimma and Mulling were found with inserts containing texts frommasses of the dead, indicating they were used for healing purposes.[5] The book of Durrow was periodically removed from its (now lost)cumdach[18] during the late medieval and early modern periods so that it could be used to bless and cure sick animals.[17]

Battle standards

[edit]

Reliquaries were often used asbattle standards in medieval Ireland, with expectation that they would boost morale, protect the troops, or grant victory.[19][20][21] Typically the relics would be held in, or represented by,crosiers, bell-shrines or cumdachs, and carried onto the battlefield by acleric, who would often be employed by the family as its "hereditary custodian".[22][23] The most well-knowncumdach used for this purpose is theCathach of St. Columba (known as The Cathach or Battler of St. Columba), used as a battle talisman by theO'Donnell family.[24] According to art historian Colum Hourihane, "not only did the shrine and its iconography have to instil fear into the enemy, but, more importantly, it had to instill confidence into the army of the O’Donnells following it".[25] The objects were usually worn around the neck, and the tradition was that the holder would circle the area three times in a "sunwise" direction before the battle commenced.[26] Othercumdachs known to have been used in this way include the Shrine of Miosach and the Shrine of Caillín.[27]

Clerics were allowed non-combatant status reducing the likelihood that the reliquary would be captured. Younger clerics were usually selected, according to the historian Anthony Lucas, as a result of "prudent consideration that they stood a better chance than men of mature years of escaping with their precious burden by speed of foot should they find themselves in a tight corner in themelee."[23] However, the holder was sometimes killed in battle; in 1497 The Cathach was captured after its keeper was slain by enemy forces.[26] Similarly, the Book of Armagh is recorded as having been brought to battlefields, and was once recovered from underneath the dead body of its custodian.[17]

Surviving examples

[edit]

Cumdachs are particular to Ireland.[28] There are eight known surviving Irish examples (in chronological order: the Lough Kinale Book-Shrine, Soiscél Molaisse,Stowe Missal, The Cathach, Shrine of Miosach,Book of Dimma, Shrine of the Book of Moling, and Shrine of Caillín of Fenagh)[29] with a further two—of the nine extant—"house-shaped shrines", namely the 12th century St Manchan's shrine and thec. 1350 additions to theDomnach Airgid.[30] All are protective enclosures intended to permanently seal off a manuscript or relic, and date from between the early 9th to the mid-16 centuries.[31]

Several of the earliest documented examples are now lost. TheBook of Durrow had a metal casing dated toc. 1002–1015[32] and the Book of Kells lost itscumdach when it was stolen in 1006. TheBook of Armagh was given a cover in 937, which was perhaps lost when it was captured in battle and ransomed by the NormanJohn de Courcy in 1177.[33] The earliest documented example was made to house and protect the Book of Durrow at the behest of the High King of IrelandFlann Sinna (877–916), by which point it was at Durrow, and believed to be a relic ofColumba (Colum Cille).[15] The shrine was lost in the 17th century, but its appearance, including an inscription recording the king's patronage, is recorded in a note from 1677, now bound into the book as folio IIv, although other inscriptions are not transcribed. Once in their shrines, such manuscripts were rarely, if ever, removed for use as a book.[34]

Lough Kinale Book Shrine

[edit]

The earliest-knowncumdach is also the largest surviving example. Dated to the late 8th or early 9th century,[35][36] it was not rediscovered until 1986 when found by divers at a depth of 2 m (6 ft 7 in) of water in theCounty Longford side ofLough Kinale.[37] Moss speculates that it was thrown in the water to evade being taken during a local chieftain feud or before a Viking raid. The inner structure is of oak, lined with tin and bronze plates attached by nails. Its front cover contains a large central cross, fivebosses inbronze, and four rounded openwork medallions containingspiral andlentoid patterns. The figures on the sides include beast heads.[10] A 2016 valuation by the NMI priced the object at £2 million (€2.54 million).[38]

Soiscél Molaisse

[edit]
Detail a panel on the front showingMatthew the Apostle.[39]

TheSoiscél Molaisse, also known as the Sheskill Molash, is the oldest survivingcumdach example largely in its original form, and was made in the early 11th century to hold the gospels ofMolaise.[40][41] It measures 14.75 cm (5.81 in) high, 11.70 cm (4.61 in) wide and 8.45 cm (3.33 in) thick[42] and was built in three phases. The wooden core with bronze casing is 8th century, to which silver plaques were fastened with nails and rivets in the 11th century, and it was re-worked again in the 14th or 15th century.[10]

Some of the figures and other elements date to the 14th century, and can be identified as they weresoldered to the plates.[43] The top face is mainly silvered bronze andsilver-gilt and contains panels the foursymbols of the Evangelists in the spaces between a cross. Some of the panels are lost; those that remain have goldfiligree interlacedknotwork.[44] The filigree on the arms of the cross aregilted and decorated with ribbon interlace. The ends of the arms were set with gems, now also lost except for one blue stone.[45] Two of panels around the sides are lost. The two remaining containinterlace and Latin inscription around their borders.[45] Its small size indicates that the original object, like the Book of Dimma, was designed to be held in a pocket.[42]

Stowe Missal

[edit]
Sidel panel,Stowe Missal

TheStowe Missal is a sacramentary dating to about 750. Itscumdach consists of metalwork plaques attached with nails to an olderoak container. The metalwork is elaborately decorated, with some animal and human figures, and one face and the sides probably date to between 1027 and 1033, on the basis of inscriptions recording its donation and making, while the other face is later, and can be dated to about 1375, again from its inscriptions.[46]

The older "lower" face, which has become detached from the case, is in silver-gilt copper alloy, with a large cross inside a border that carries the inscription in Irish, which also runs along the arms of the cross. The centre of the cross was later replaced ("severely embellished" as the National Museum put it),[47] probably at the same time as the later face, by a setting for a now missing large stone with four lobed sections, similar to the centre of the lower face. The inscription has missing sections because of this, but can mostly be reconstructed as asking for a prayer for the abbot of Lorrha, Mathgamain Ua Cathail (c. 1037) and forFind Ua Dúngalaigh, king ofMúscraige Tíre (c. 1033).

Cathach of St. Columba

[edit]
The Shrine ofCathach of St. Columba

TheCathach of St. Columba, also known as The Cathach, is probably the best-knowncumdach. Built for the Cathach of St. Columba, an importantpsalter usually dated to just after the death of Colum Cille in 597, it is probably the earliest Irish book to survive and a very prestigious relic.[26] The manuscript belonged to the O'Donnells while its shrine was famously used as a battle standard.[48]

The initial metalwork dates from 1072 to 1098 atKells, when a new protective casing of wood and silver was added. The front cover was added in the 14th century, and included a large seatedChrist in Majesty flanked by scenes of the Crucifixion and saints in giltrepoussé.[49] It was taken to the continent in 1691 following theTreaty of Limerick, and did not return to Ireland until 1813. That year thecumdach was reopened, leading to the rediscovery of the manuscript. It was by then in very poor condition, but underwent a major restoration in 1982 when the extant pages were rebound and remounted onvellum leaves.[26]

Shrine of Miosach

[edit]
Panel for the front of the Shrine of Miosach, late 11th century, added to c. 1534

TheShrine of Miosach (or The Misach) originates fromClonmany,County Donegal, and was also used in battle.[50] Originally a late 11th-century relic, it was reworked in 1534 by the goldsmith Brian O'Morrison with repoussé silver decoration with many figures around a cross.[51][36] O'Morrison added twelve front plates in three arrangements, including depictions of the crowned Virgin and Child in the smaller inner panels,[52] and, in four larger panels,Saint Bridget,St. Patrick and Colm Cille.[36]

There is no record of what the original container might have held. The object was at first associated with St Cairneach of Dulane,County Meath, but by the Gothic period had been "absorbed into the cult of St Columba".[53][54] The 11th-century castcopper alloy plates on the sides are decorated with openworkzoomorphic illustrations. Its metal cord survives for carrying it, and it was probably round the neck.[55]

Domnach Airgid

[edit]
Front of the Domnach Airgid, late 8–9th and 14–15th centuries

TheDomnach Airgid, whose title translates in English as theSilver church, dates to the 8th century, but little is visible from before major additions dated toc. 1350 under commission by the abbot ofClones. A three-dimensional figure of Christ crucified is at the centre of the main face, accompanied byrelief plaques of saints, the Virgin and Child and other scenes on the sides.[31]

The reliefs are more sophisticated compared to the other known 14th-centurycumdachs, with elegant running animals on small mounts at the corners. It is signed by its goldsmith John O Bardan, who is recorded living atDrogheda; by then goldsmiths in Ireland, as elsewhere in Europe, were usually laymen.[56]

Book of Dimma

[edit]

TheBook of Dimma cumdach dates to the 12th century and was built for the small 8th-century manuscript known as the Book of Dimma. The manuscript is traditionally associated with the abbey's founderSt Crónán (died 619). Its small size indicated it was intended as a portable pocket book used for study or contemplation. It is made up of copies of four Gospels and contains stylised portraits of theApostlesSt. Matthew,St. Mark andSt. Luke.[57]

The shrine consists of a shell of decorated bronze plates, and like itsilluminated manuscript originates from the abbey ofRoscrea. The first phase of thecumdach was completed during a period of prosperity for the abbey and broadly coincides with the building of aRomanesque church on the site. It was refurbishedc. 1400 by one of the chieftains of the local Ua Cerbaill family.[57] One face of thecumdach's panels of openwork decoration in VikingRingerike style. Like the manuscript, it is inTrinity College Library, Dublin, while an early 20th-century reproduction is in New York.[58]

Shrine of Caillín of Fenagh

[edit]
The Shrine of St. Caillín, NMI
Main article:Shrine of St Caillín

The Shrine of Caillín of Fenagh is a late example built to hold ac. 1516 manuscript which updates a much earlier book detailing the life of St.Caillín ofFenagh, County Leitrim (fl.c. 570), which may have been written by the saint himself.[59][60] Caillín is described by Lucas as "something of a specialist in the production of battle talismans"[61] and according to legend, in his lifetime commissioned a number of battle standards, includingcathachs in the form a bell and a containers for a Gospel.[61] It was badly damaged in a devastating 2009 fire atSt Mel's Cathedral, Longford, where it had been kept since 1980.[62] The remains of the shrine was acquired by the NMI the following year; the manuscript is now in the collection of theRoyal Irish Academy.[63] There is some doubt as to if the shrine was actually intended as acumdach, including the fact that it is smaller than the manuscript.[62]

Study and conservation

[edit]

Although most of the extant book-shaped protective shrines are mentioned inIrish annals, they were not properly described until the early 19th century when antiquarians and collectors such asGeorge Petrie began to seek them out from hereditary collections. Most are badly damaged, including due to general wear and tear over the centuries, events such as fires at their holding location, or most usually having elements such as their gemstones removed for sale by their owners. A majority are now in the NMI.

The most significant lostcumdachs mentioned in Irish annals, which are also the three earliest, are the shrines for the Book of Armagh (added 938 AD), Book of Durrow (c. 877—91)[48] and the shrine for the Book of Kells (which may have only been an ornamental metal container, rather than a permanently sealed and illustrated cover), which is recorded as plundered in the 1007annals of Ulster.[5][64]

References

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^Joynt (1917), p. 186
  2. ^Greenfield, Jane (2002).ABC of bookbinding: a unique glossary with over 700 illustrations for collectors and librarians. New Castle (Del.) Nottingham (GB): Oak Knoll press The Plough press. p. 20.ISBN 978-1-884718-41-0.
  3. ^Warner, xliv
  4. ^Antiquities, 262
  5. ^abcdefMoss (2014), p. 298
  6. ^Youngs, 129–130, 134–140
  7. ^Antiquities, 183; Youngs, 58–59, 129–130
  8. ^Moss (2014), pp. 298, 300
  9. ^Moss (2014), p. 299
  10. ^abcMoss (2014), p. 300
  11. ^"Lindau Gospels". New York:Morgan Library. Retrieved 2 July 2021
  12. ^Mitchell (1996), p. 6
  13. ^Mitchell (1996), pp. 22–23
  14. ^Mitchell (1996), p. 7
  15. ^abO'Neill (2014), p. 14
  16. ^O'Neill (2014), pp. 7, 10
  17. ^abcO'Neill (2014), p. 7
  18. ^Mitchell (1996), p. 28
  19. ^Overbey (2012), p. 135
  20. ^Joynt (1917), p. 187
  21. ^Lucas (1986), p. 17
  22. ^Overbey (2012), pp. 171–172
  23. ^abLucas (1986), p. 20
  24. ^Lacey (1998), pp. 100–101
  25. ^Hourihane (2003), p. 118
  26. ^abcdO'Neill (2014), p. 12
  27. ^Lucas (1986), pp. 19, 27
  28. ^Crawford (1923), p. 75
  29. ^Moss (2014), p. 297
  30. ^Moss (2014), pp. 286, 294
  31. ^abMoss (2014), p. 294
  32. ^Mitchell (1996), pp. 5, 29
  33. ^Crawford (1923), p. 76
  34. ^Meehan (1996), p. 13
  35. ^Overbey (2012), pp. 5–6
  36. ^abc"Enshrining The Book".Trinity College Dublin, 2016. Retrieved 26 June 2021
  37. ^Kelly (1993), p. 168
  38. ^Gartland, Fiona. "Early Christian book shrine caused much soul searching".The Irish Times, 30 December 2016. Retrieved 2 July 2021
  39. ^Stokes (1871), p. 19
  40. ^NMI (R4006)
  41. ^Stevick (2008), p. 37
  42. ^abÓ Floinn (1989), 51–52
  43. ^Ó Floinn (1989), 54
  44. ^Antiquities, 233
  45. ^abÓ Floinn (1989), 57
  46. ^Ó Floinn, "Description"; Warner, xliv – lvii, Plates I – VI; Stokes, 78;older face from Flickr
  47. ^Wallace (2002), p. 234
  48. ^abStokes (2011), p. 80
  49. ^Antiquities, pp. 233, 269; Stokes, p. 79
  50. ^Lucas (1986), p. 27
  51. ^NMI 2001:84, 23.2 cm wide
  52. ^Fitzpatrick (2004), p. 3
  53. ^Antiquities, 269
  54. ^Moss (2014), pp. 302–303
  55. ^Mullarkey (2014), 302
  56. ^Antiquities, 261–262, 270
  57. ^abO'Neill (2014), p. 26
  58. ^Book of Dimma Shrine: early 20th century (original dated 11th century)".Metropolitan Museum of Art. Retrieved 2 July 2021
  59. ^"The shrine of St Caillín of Fenagh and its place in Irish late medieval art".Royal Irish Academy, 2016. Retrieved 7 July 2021
  60. ^Scott (2017), p. 18
  61. ^abLucas (1986), p. 19
  62. ^abScott (2017), p. 20
  63. ^Scott (2017), pp. 18, 20
  64. ^Annals of Ulster,U1007.11

Sources

[edit]

External links

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related tocumdachs.
Extant
Lost
Relate
Types
Techniques
Examples
Collections
Notable art historians
Related
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cumdach&oldid=1281381730"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp