This article has multiple issues. Please helpimprove it or discuss these issues on thetalk page.(Learn how and when to remove these messages) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
|
Culture theory is the branch of comparativeanthropology andsemiotics that seeks to define theheuristic concept ofculture inoperational and/orscientific terms.
In the 19th century, "culture" was used by some to refer to a wide array ofhuman activities, and by some others as a synonym for "civilization". In the 20th century,anthropologists began theorizing about culture as an object of scientific analysis. Some used it to distinguish humanadaptive strategies from the largelyinstinctive adaptive strategies ofanimals, including the adaptive strategies of otherprimates and non-humanhominids, whereas others used it to refer to symbolicrepresentations and expressions of human experience, with no direct adaptive value. Both groups understood culture as being definitive ofhuman nature.
According to sometheories that have gained acceptance among anthropologists, culture exhibits the way that humans interpret theirbiology and theirenvironment. According to this point of view, culture becomes such an integral part of humanexistence that itis the human environment, and most culturalchange can be attributed to human adaptation tohistorical events. Moreover, given that culture is seen as the primary adaptive mechanism of humans and takes place much faster thanhuman biological evolution, most cultural change can be viewed as culture adapting to itself.
Although most anthropologists try to define culture in such a way that it separates human beings from other animals, many human traits are similar to those of other animals, particularly the traits of other primates. For example,chimpanzees have bigbrains, but human brains are bigger. Similarly,bonobos exhibit complexsexual behaviour, but human beings exhibit much more complexsexual behaviours. As such, anthropologists often debate whetherhuman behaviour is different fromanimal behaviour in degree rather than in kind; they must also find ways to distinguish cultural behaviour from sociological behaviour andpsychological behavior.
Acceleration and amplification of these various aspects of culture change have been explored by complexity economist,W. Brian Arthur. In his book,The Nature of Technology, Arthur attempts to articulate atheory of change that considers that existing technologies (or material culture) are combined in unique ways that lead to novel new technologies. Behind that novel combination is a purposeful effort arising in human motivation. This articulation would suggest that we are just beginning to understand what might be required for a more robust theory of culture and culture change, one that brings coherence across many disciplines and reflects an integrating elegance.
| Part ofa series on |
| Anthropology |
|---|