They are closely related to theUnited Kingdom (UK), although they are not part of it.[4][5] They have the status of "territories for which the United Kingdom is responsible", rather thansovereign states.[6] As a result, they are not member states of theCommonwealth of Nations.[7] However, they do have relationships with the Commonwealth and other international organisations, and are members of theBritish–Irish Council. They have their own teams in theCommonwealth Games.
Each island's political development has been largely independent from, though often parallel with, that of the UK,[8] and they are akin to "miniature states with wide powers of self-government".[9]
As the Crown Dependencies are not sovereign states, the power to pass legislation affecting the islands ultimately rests with theKing-in-Council (though this power is rarely exercised without theconsent of the dependencies, and the right to do so is disputed). However, they each have their ownlegislative assembly, with power to legislate on many local matters with the assent of the Crown (thePrivy Council, or, in the case of the Isle of Man, in certain circumstances thelieutenant-governor or, in the case of the Bailiwick of Guernsey, the Lieutenant-Governor).[10] In Jersey and the Isle of Man, thehead of government is called thechief minister. In Guernsey, the head representative of the committee-based government is thePresident of the Policy and Resources Committee.
The term "Crown Dependencies" has been disputed byGavin St Pier, formerChief Minister of Guernsey. He argues that the term was an administrative invention ofWhitehall, which incorrectly implies that the islands are dependent upon the Crown, and advocates instead the use of the term "Crown Dominion".[11]
EachBailiwick is a Crown dependency and each is headed by aBailiff, with a Lieutenant Governor representing the Crown in each Bailiwick. Each Bailiwick has its own legal and healthcare systems and its own separate immigration policy, with "local status" in one Bailiwick having no validity in the other. The two Bailiwicks exercise bilateraldouble taxation treaties. Since 1961, the Bailiwicks have had separate courts ofappeal, but generally, the Bailiff of each Bailiwick has been appointed to serve on the panel of appellate judges for the other Bailiwick.
The parliament of Guernsey is theStates of Deliberation, the parliament of Sark is called theChief Pleas, and the parliament of Alderney is called theStates of Alderney. The three parliaments together can also approve joint Bailiwick-wide legislation that applies in those parts of the Bailiwick whose parliaments approve it. There are nopolitical parties in any of the parliaments; candidates stand for election asindependents.[21]
TheBailiwick of Jersey consists of the island of Jersey and a number of surrounding uninhabited islands.
The parliament is theStates Assembly, the first known mention of which is in a document of 1497.[22] TheStates of Jersey Law 2005 introduced the post ofChief Minister of Jersey, abolished the Bailiff's power of dissent to a resolution of the States and the Lieutenant Governor's power of veto over a resolution of the States, and established that any Order in Council or Act of the United Kingdom proposed to apply to Jersey must be referred to the States so that the States can express their views on it.[23] There are fewpolitical parties, as candidates generally stand for election as independents.
The Isle of Man'sTynwald claims to be the world's oldestparliament in continuous existence, dating back to 979. (However, it does not claim to be the oldest parliament, asIceland'sAlthing dates back to 930.) It consists of a popularly electedHouse of Keys and an indirectly electedLegislative Council. These two branches may sit separately or jointly to consider pieces of legislation, which, when passed into law, are known as "Acts of Tynwald". Candidates mostly stand for election to the Keys as independents, rather than being selected bypolitical parties. There is a Council of Ministers headed by achief minister.[24]
Unlike the other Crown Dependencies, the Isle of Man has aCommon Purse Agreement with the United Kingdom.
As overseas territories were added to the land conquered by the British, a number of towns and villages began to request formal recognition to validate their importance, and would be accorded a status if deemed to be deserving such as aborough or as a more prestigiouscity by the monarch. Many cities were designated over several centuries, and asAnglican dioceses began to be created the process of city creation became aligned to that used in England, being linked to the presence of acathedral.[25]
Despite this,St Patrick's Isle adjoining the Isle of Man, which had amedieval cathedral, was never granted privileges of a city. What is nowPeel Cathedral was later built nearby, but only raised to the status of a cathedral in the 1980s.
Since the year 2000, the UK government has arranged competitions to grant city status to settlements. In 2021,submissions for city status were invited to mark thePlatinum Jubilee of Elizabeth II, with Crown Dependencies and British Overseas Territories being allowed to take part for the first time.[26] In the Dependencies, the only applicants were Douglas and Peel, both on the Isle of Man,[27] and Douglas was granted the honour, making it the first formal city.[28]
According to the 1973Kilbrandon Report, the Crown Dependencies are "like miniature states".[29][30] According to a 2010 Commons Justice Committee, they are independent from the UK and from each other and their relationship is with the Crown. The UK's responsibilities derive from that fact.[29]
All "insular" legislation has to receive the approval of the "King in Council", in effect, thePrivy Council in London.[31] Certain types of domestic legislation in the Isle of Man and the Bailiwick of Guernsey, however, may be signed into law by the Lieutenant Governor, using delegated powers, without having to pass through the Privy Council. In Jersey, provisional legislation of an administrative nature may be adopted by means oftriennial regulations (renewable after three years), without requiring the assent of the Privy Council.[32] Much legislation, in practice, is effected by means ofsecondary legislation under the authority of prior laws or Orders in Council.
A unique constitutional position has arisen in the Channel Islands as successive monarchs have confirmed theliberties and privileges of the Bailiwicks, often referring to the so-calledConstitutions of King John, a legendary document supposed to have been granted by King John in the aftermath of 1204. Governments of the Bailiwicks have generally tried to avoid testing the limits of the unwritten constitution by avoiding conflict with British governments. Following the restoration ofKing Charles II, who had spent part of his exile in Jersey, the Channel Islands were given the right to set their own customs duties, referred to by theJersey Legal French term asimpôts.
The monarch is represented by aLieutenant Governor in each Crown dependency, but this post is largely ceremonial. Since 2010 the Lieutenant Governors of each Crown dependency have been recommended to the Crown by a panel in each respective Crown dependency; this replaced the previous system of the appointments being made by the Crown on the recommendation of UK ministers.[33][34] In 2005, it was decided in the Isle of Man to replace the Lieutenant Governor with aCrown Commissioner, but this decision was reversed before it was implemented.
Elizabeth II, the former Lord of Mann, on Isle of Man stamps
"The Crown" is defined differently in each Crown Dependency. Legislation of the Isle of Man defines the "Crown in right of the Isle of Man" as being separate from the "Crown in right of the United Kingdom".[35] In theIsle of Man the British monarch is styledLord of Mann, a title variously held byNorse,Scottish and English kings and nobles (the English nobles infealty to the English Crown) until it was revested into the British monarchy in 1765. The title "Lord" is today used irrespective of the gender of the person who holds it.
"La Reine, Notre Duc" (The Queen, Our Duke): title of aDiamond Jubilee exhibition at the Jersey Arts Centre in 2012
The Channel Islands are part of the territory annexed by theDuchy of Normandy in 933 from theDuchy of Brittany. This territory was added to the grant of land given in settlement by the King of France in 911 to the Viking raiders who had sailed up the Seine almost to the walls of Paris.William the Conqueror, Duke of Normandy, claimed the titleKing of England in 1066, following the death ofEdward the Confessor, and secured the claim through theNorman conquest of England. Subsequent marriages between Kings of England and French nobles meant that Kings of England had title to more French lands than the King of France. When the King of France asserted his feudal right ofpatronage, the then-King of England, KingJohn, fearing he would be imprisoned should he attend, failed to fulfill his obligation.
In 1204, the title and lands of the Duchy ofNormandy and his other French possessions were stripped from KingJohn of England by the King of France. The Channel Islands remained in the possession of the King of England, who ruled them as Duke of Normandy until theTreaty of Paris in 1259. John's son,Henry III, renounced the title of Duke of Normandy by that treaty, and none of his successors ever revived it. The Channel Islands continued to be governed by the Kings of England as French fiefs, distinct from Normandy, until theHundred Years' War, during which they were definitively separated from France. At no time did the Channel Islands form part of the Kingdom of England, and they remained legally separate, though under the same monarch, through the subsequent unions of England with Wales (1536), Scotland (1707) and Ireland (1801).
Charles III reigns over the Channel Islands directly, and not by virtue of his role as monarch of the United Kingdom. No specific title is associated with his role as monarch of the Channel Islands. The monarch has been described, in Jersey, as the "King in right of Jersey",[16] and in legislation as the "Sovereign of the Bailiwick of Jersey" and "Sovereign in right of the Bailiwick of Jersey".[17]
In Jersey, statements in the 21st century of the constitutional position by theLaw Officers of the Crown define it as the "Crown in right of Jersey",[36] with all Crown land in the Bailiwick of Jersey belonging to the Crown in right of Jersey and not to theCrown Estate of the United Kingdom.[37] In Guernsey, legislation refers to the "Crown in right of the Bailiwick",[12] and the Law Officers of the Crown of Guernsey submitted that "The Crown in this context ordinarily means the Crown in right of therépublique of the Bailiwick of Guernsey"[38] and that this comprises "the collective governmental and civic institutions, established by and under the authority of the Monarch, for the governance of these Islands, including the States of Guernsey and legislatures in the other Islands, the Royal Court and other courts, the Lieutenant Governor, Parish authorities, and the Crown acting in and through the Privy Council."[39] This constitutional concept is also worded as the "Crown in right of the Bailiwick of Guernsey".[38]
Crown Dependencies and British Overseas Territories (BOTs) share a similar geopolitical status. They are both categories of self-governing territories which fall under British sovereignty (the Head of State being theKing of the United Kingdom) and for which the UK is responsible internationally. Neither Crown Dependencies nor BOTs are part of the UK and neither send representatives to the UK Parliament.[40]
However, Crown Dependencies are distinct from BOTs. Unlike BOTs, which are remnants of the British Empire, the Crown Dependencies have a much older relationship with the UK, springing from their status as "feudatory kingdoms" subject to the English Crown. The self-governing status of the BOTs evolved through Acts of Parliament and the creation of fairly homogeneous political structures. On the other hand, the political systems of the Crown Dependencies evolved in anad hoc manner, resulting in particular and unique political structures in each dependency.[40]
TheUnited Kingdom, Crown Dependencies and British Overseas Territories collectively form "one, undivided realm" under theBritish monarchy.[41][42] Crown Dependencies have the international status of "territories for which the United Kingdom is responsible" rather than sovereign states.[6] The relationship between the governments of the Crown Dependencies and the UK is "one of mutual respect and support, i.e. a partnership".[43] There is a significant gap between the official and operational relationship between the UK and the islands.[44]
Until 2001, responsibility for the UK Government's relationships with the Crown dependencies rested with theHome Office, but it was then transferred first to theLord Chancellor's Department, then to theDepartment for Constitutional Affairs, and finally to theMinistry of Justice. In 2010, the Ministry of Justice stated that relationships with the Crown Dependencies are the responsibility of the United Kingdom Government as a whole, with the Ministry of Justice holding responsibility for the constitutional relationship and other ministries engaging with their opposite numbers in the Crown Dependencies according to their respective policy areas.[7]
The UK Government is solely responsible for defence and international representation[5] (although, in accordance with 2007 framework agreements,[45] the UK has elected not to act internationally on behalf of the Crown Dependencies without prior consultation). The Crown Dependencies are within theCommon Travel Area and apply the samevisa policy as the UK, but each Crown dependency has responsibility for its own customs and immigration services.
The constitutional and cultural proximity of the islands to the UK means that there are shared institutions and organisations. TheBBC, for example, has local radio stations in the Channel Islands, and also a website run by a team based in the Isle of Man (which is included inBBC North West). Similarly,ITV Channel Television is a franchise in the UK'sITV network, while the Isle of Man falls within theITV Granada franchise area. While the islands now assume responsibility for their own post and telecommunications, they continue to participate in theUK telephone numbering plan, and they have adoptedpostcode systems that are compatible with that of the UK. For purposes ofamateur radio awards they are counted as separate jurisdictions.[48]
The growth of offshore finance in all three territories led to a "conflictual relationship" with the UK governments of the 2000s.[44]
The Crown Dependencies, together with the United Kingdom, are collectivelyknown as theBritish Islands. Since theBritish Nationality Act 1981 came into effect, they have been treated as part of the United Kingdom forBritish nationality law purposes.[49] However, each Crown dependency maintains local controls over housing and employment, with special rules applying to British citizens without specified connections to that Crown dependency (as well as to non-British citizens).
For the purposes of international agreements, the islands were considered part of the Britishmetropolitan territory until a declaration was agreed in 1950 that henceforth the three territories would be considered distinct from the UK and each other.[29]: 19
In 2007–2008, each Crown Dependency and the UK signed agreements[45][53][54] that established frameworks for the development of the international identity of each Crown Dependency. Among the points clarified in the agreements were that:
The UK has no democratic accountability in and for the Crown Dependencies, which are governed by their own democratically elected assemblies;
The UK will not act internationally on behalf of the Crown Dependencies without prior consultation;
Each Crown Dependency has an international identity that is different from that of the UK;
The UK supports the principle of each Crown Dependency further developing its international identity;
The UK recognises that the interests of each Crown Dependency may differ from those of the UK, and the UK will seek to represent any differing interests when acting in an international capacity; and
The UK and each Crown Dependency will work together to resolve or clarify any differences that may arise between their respective interests.
While the Parliament of the United Kingdom has the power to legislate for the Crown Dependencies without prior consultation, the United Kingdom is expected to seek permission from the dependencies before doing so.[55][56]
Generally speaking, the British government will only extend international agreements to the Crown Dependencies with their permission. Under international law, the British government is responsible for ensuring the dependencies comply with any treaties that extend to them.[57]
The United Kingdom Parliament has power to legislate for the Islands, but Acts of Parliament do not extend to the Islands automatically, but only by express mention or necessary implication ... 'it can be said that a constitutional convention has been established whereby Parliament does not legislate for the islands without their consent on domestic matters'.
— Baroness Hale,R (Barclay) v Secy of State for Justice [2014] 3 WLR 1142, at para 12.
Acts of theUK Parliament do not usually apply to the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man, unless explicitly stated. UK legislation does not ordinarily extend to them without their consent.[7] For a UK Act to extend otherwise than by anOrder in Council is now very unusual.[5] The States of Jersey Law 2005[58] and subsequently the 2019 amended version ofThe Reform (Guernsey) Law, 1948,[59] established that all Acts of Parliament and Orders in Council which have application to either island were to be referred to their respective States assemblies for debate before registration in their Royal Court.
When deemed advisable, Acts of Parliament may be extended to the islands by means of an Order in Council (thus giving the UK Government some responsibility forgood governance in the islands). An example of this was theTelevision Act 1954, which was extended to the Channel Islands, so as to create a localITV franchise, known asChannel Television. By constitutional convention this is only done at the request of the insular authorities,[60] and has become a rare option (thus giving the insular authorities themselves the responsibility for good governance in the islands); the islands usually prefer nowadays to pass their own versions of laws giving effect to international treaties.
Each dependency retains its own distinct law and legal system. The Channel Islands' law systems are founded in the traditions of Norman law. For all three states, there is a right of judicial appeal tothe Crown via theJudicial Committee of the Privy Council, whose judgements are binding once approved and promulgated bythe King via anOrder-in-Council.[44]
Westminster[vague] retains the right to legislate for the islands against their will as a last resort, but this is also rarely exercised, and may, according to legal opinion from the Attorney-General of Jersey, have fallen intodesuetude – although the Department for Constitutional Affairs did not accept this argument. TheMarine, &c., Broadcasting (Offences) Act 1967 was one recent piece of legislation extended to the Isle of Man against the wishes of Tynwald.[citation needed]
There are many highly authoritative assertions of Parliament's sovereignty over Jersey, such as the 1861 Civil Commissioners. According to theKilbrandon Report, the long-standing convention against Parliament intervening in domestic matters did not limit Parliament's authority to legislate for the Crown Dependencies without consent.Baroness Hale further asserted this legal opinion in 2014 (quotation above), though she did not hear arguments from Crown Dependency governments in that case.[61]
Conversely,Jeffrey Jowell argues that Parliament's powers are "of last resort" and do not therefore constitute paramount power to intervene in the Dependencies' internal affairs. He argues that as the powers have always been used within the limits of their justification, these have become constitutional law.Henry John Stephen argued that, as the Duchy of Normandy conquered England and its territory has never been annexed into England, the level ofparliamentary sovereignty exercised elsewhere in the British Empire may not apply to the Channel Islands.[61]
The UK Government has a monopoly on advising how the royal prerogative – such as giving royal assent to Channel Islands' legislation – should be exercised in the Crown Dependencies.[61] Gavin St Pier, former Chief Minister of Guernsey, has called in 2023 for the Channel Islands to reconsider their constitutional relationship with the UK, "making us less susceptible to whimsical breach of conventions should the UK continue to convulse politically". He called for the Islands to have more power of the exercise of the royal prerogative by their appointment of Privy Counsellors.[62]
While their constitutional status bears some resemblance to that of theCommonwealth realms, the Crown Dependencies are not independent members of theCommonwealth of Nations. They participate in the Commonwealth of Nations by virtue of their relationship with the United Kingdom, and participate in various Commonwealth institutions in their own right. For example, all three participate in theCommonwealth Parliamentary Association and theCommonwealth Games.
All three Crown Dependencies regard the existing situation as unsatisfactory and have lobbied for change. The States of Jersey have called on the British Foreign Secretary to request that theCommonwealth Heads of Government "consider granting associate membership to Jersey and the other Crown Dependencies as well as any other territories at a similarly advanced stage of autonomy". Jersey has proposed that it be accorded "self-representation in all Commonwealth meetings; full participation in debates and procedures, with a right to speak where relevant and the opportunity to enter into discussions with those who are full members; and no right to vote in the Ministerial or Heads of Government meetings, which is reserved for full members".[63] The States of Guernsey and the Government of the Isle of Man have made calls of a similar nature for a more integrated relationship with the Commonwealth,[64] including more direct representation and enhanced participation in Commonwealth organisations and meetings, includingCommonwealth Heads of Government Meetings.[65] TheChief Minister of the Isle of Man has said: "A closer connection with the Commonwealth itself would be a welcome further development of the Island's international relationships"[66]
This section needs to beupdated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(February 2023)
The Crown Dependencies have never been EU member states, including during the period when the UK was. During that time, their relationship with the EU was governed by Protocol 3 of theEuropean Communities Act 1972. The Dependencies were part of theEU customs territory[67] (though only the Isle of Man was in theVAT area)[68] and took part in thefree movements of goods, but not thefree movement of persons, services or capital.[67] TheCommon Agricultural Policy of the EU never applied to the Crown Dependencies, and their citizens never took part in elections to theEuropean Parliament. Although they were stillEuropean citizens, British citizens who had a connection to the Crown Dependencies only were not entitled to freedom of movement rights.[69][70]
With theBrexit negotiations, the House of Lords produced a report titled "Brexit: the Crown Dependencies", which stated that the "UK Government must continue to fulfil its constitutional obligations to represent the interests of the Crown Dependencies in international relations, even where these differ from those of the UK, both during the Brexit negotiations and beyond."[71] In the "Great Repeal Bill"white paper published on 30 March 2017 the UK government stated, "The Government is committed to engaging with the Crown Dependencies, Gibraltar and the other Overseas Territories as we leave the EU."[72]: ch.5
The most contentious Brexit issue was an upset to the arrangement offishing rights of fishermen from France, Jersey, or Guernsey who wished to fish in the territorial waters of a different jurisdiction; proof of historic fishing in the jurisdiction was required in order to obtain a fishing permit, but all communications on the matter had to be routed via national or EU officials in London, Paris, or Brussels, leading to delays. This was resolved after officials in the affected French regions were allowed to communicate directly to counterparts in Guernsey and Jersey.[73]
The UK requirement for EU citizens to present passports to enter theCommon Travel Area resulted in a drop of day visitors to Jersey in particular. This issue was resolved in 2022 when Jersey (with UK approval) began to allow French nationals to enter the bailiwick on day trips using just theirnational ID card.[74] Guernsey followed suit.
All three Crown Dependencies participate in an open borders area, along with the United Kingdom and Ireland. An informal memorandum of understanding exists between the member countries of theCommon Travel Area (CTA) whereby the internal borders of each country are expected to have minimal controls, if any, and can normally be crossed by British and Irish citizens with minimal identity documents (with certain exceptions). Under Irish law,Manx people and Channel Islanders – who were not entitled to take advantage of the European Union'sfreedom of movement provisions – are exempt from immigration control and immune from deportation.[75]
In May 2019, the British and Irish governments signed a Memorandum of Understanding in an effort to secure the rights of British and Irish citizens after Brexit.[76] The document was signed inLondon before a meeting of the British-Irish Intergovernmental Conference, putting the rights of both countries' citizens, that were already in place under an informal agreement, on a more secure footing.
The agreement, which is the culmination of over two years' work of both governments, means the rights of both countries' citizens are protected after Brexit whilst also ensuring that Ireland can continue to meet its obligations under European Union law. The agreement took effect on 31 January 2020 when the United Kingdom left the European Union. The maintenance of the CTA involves considerable cooperation on immigration matters between the British and Irish authorities.
On 31 January 2020 the UK–Crown Dependencies Customs Union was officially established.[78]
In 2020 theUK Government made the Customs (Tariff Quotas) (EU Exit) Regulations 2020. These regulations apply in modified form in the Crown Dependencies.[79]
^"God Save the King" is thenational anthem by custom, not statute, and there is no authorised version. Typically only the first verse is usually sung, although the second verse is also often sung as well at state and public events.[3] The wordsKing, he, him, his, used at present, are replaced byQueen, she, her when the monarch is female.
^Each dependency produces their own local issue coins and notes and accept all UK notes.
^French:Dépendances de la Couronne;Manx:Croghaneyn-crooin;Jèrriais:Dépendances d'la Couronne
^abOn the Channel Islands the monarch is informally known as theDuke of Normandy. However, the title is not used in formal government publications and does not exist as a matter of Channel Islands law.[13][14]
^Saint Peter Port is also thede facto capital of the whole Bailiwick.
^Also known in legislation as the "Sovereign of the Bailiwick of Jersey" and "Sovereign in right of the Bailiwick of Jersey".[17]
^Fact sheet on the UK's relationship with the Crown Dependencies(PDF), UK Ministry of Justice,archived(PDF) from the original on 20 December 2021, retrieved2 February 2025,The Crown Dependencies are not recognised internationally as sovereign States in their own right but as 'territories for which the United Kingdom is responsible'.
^Report of the Royal Commission on the Constitution, "Kilbrandon Report". 1973. Vol 1.
^"Profile of Jersey".States of Jersey. Archived fromthe original on 2 September 2006. Retrieved31 July 2008.The legislature passes primary legislation, which requires approval by The King in Council, and enacts subordinate legislation in many areas without any requirement for Royal Sanction and under powers conferred by primary legislation.
^Section 1 of theBritish Nationality Act 1981 grants citizenship to (most) people born in the United Kingdom. Section 50 of the Act defines 'United Kingdom' for the purposes of that Act to include the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man, overriding the usual definition from Schedule 1 of theInterpretation Act 1978 which excludes them.
^Protocol 3 of the Treaty of Accession of the United Kingdom, Ireland, and Denmark (OJ L 73, 27 March 1972).
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
