| Part of thePolitics Series |
| Party politics |
|---|
 Politics portal |
In someparliamentary systems (e.g., inCanada and theUnited Kingdom), politicians are said tocross the floor if theyformally change their political affiliation to a political party different from the one they were initially elected under. InAustralia, this term simply refers to Members of Parliament (MPs) who dissent from theparty line and vote against the express instructions of theparty whip while retaining membership in their political party.[a]
Voting against party lines may lead to consequences such as losing a position (e.g., as minister or a portfolio critic) or being ejected from the party caucus. While these practices are legally permissible in most countries, crossing the floor can lead to controversy and media attention. Some countries likeMalaysia,Pakistan,India,[1]Indonesia, theMaldives andBangladesh[2] have laws that remove a member from parliament due to floor-crossing.
The term originates from theBritish House of Commons, which is configured with the Government andOpposition facing each other on rows of benches. In consequence,MPs who switch from the governing party to one in opposition (or vice versa) also change which side of the chamber on which they sit. A notable example of this isWinston Churchill, who crossed the floor from theConservatives to theLiberals in 1904, later crossing back in 1924. The term has passed into general use in otherWestminster parliamentary democracies even if many of these countries have semicircular or horseshoe-shaped debating chambers.
The Australia meaning on the other hand arises from the way divisions—roll call votes—are conducted.[3] In Australian chambers, members move to the government benches (on the presiding officer's right) to vote in favor of a motion, and the opposition benches (on the presiding officer's left) to vote against a motion. Therefore, an MP who crosses the floor is on the opposite side of the chamber from the rest of their party, and on government motions frequently on the opposite side of the chamber than they normally sit.
InNigeria, the term "crossing the carpet" or "carpet crossing" is used.[4] In India, a similar expression is "Aaya Ram Gaya Ram", referring to political floor-crossing.[5]
In the United Kingdom and Canada, crossing the floor means leaving one's party entirely and joining another caucus. For example, leaving an opposition party to support the government (or vice versa), leaving or being expelled from the party one ran with at election and sitting as a clear[note 1] independent, or even leaving one opposition party to join another. In both countries, the term carries only this meaning, not simply voting against the party line on a bill.
In April 2006, then-premier of ManitobaGary Doer of theNew Democratic Party of Manitoba proposed banning crossing the floor in the Manitoba legislature in response to "the concern some voters have expressed over the high-profile defections of three federal MPs from their parties in just over two years".[6] The resulting legislation, which amended the provincialLegislative Assembly Act, mandated that members of the legislature who quit (or are expelled from) their political party had to serve out the remainder of their term as independents.[7] However, in 2018, theProgressive Conservative government ofBrian Pallister repealed the bill.[8][9]
An extraordinary example occurred in Alberta, Canada, in December 2014 byDanielle Smith, the Leader of the Official Opposition. She and eight of her MLAs, all of theWildrose Party, crossed the floor together to join the governingProgressive Conservative Association of Alberta.[10] In 2019, elevenBritish MPs defected from the Conservative andLabour parties to form theChange UK party. In September 2019, the governing Conservative party lost its working majority whenPhillip Lee MP defected to theLiberal Democrats during the first speech of new prime ministerBoris Johnson.[11] On 19 January 2022,Christian Wakeford, ConservativeMP forBury South, crossed the floor to the Labour benches.[12]
In some countries, the phrase "crossing the floor" describes members of a government party or parties who defect by voting with the opposition against some piece of government-sponsored legislation. Political parties commonly allow their members a free vote on some matters of personal conscience. In Australia, one of the major parties, theAustralian Labor Party requires its members to pledge their support for the collective decisions of the caucus,[13] which theoretically prohibits them from "crossing the floor" in this sense; however, in practice, some Labor members disregard this pledge, despite the disciplinary action which may result. Among other parties, crossing the floor is rare, although then SenatorBarnaby Joyce of theNational Party of Australia crossed the floor 28 times.[14] Tasmanian SenatorSir Reg Wright voted against his own party, theLiberal Party of Australia, on 150 occasions, which has been claimed as a record for this form of crossing the floor in the Australian Parliament.