Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Cross-coupled LC oscillator

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Type of electronic oscillator
This articlemay requirecopy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling. You can assist byediting it.(July 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Schematic of a cross-coupled LC oscillator using n-MOSFETs (M1 and M2) as differential transconductor

Across-coupled LC oscillator is a type ofelectronic oscillator that employs a pair of cross-coupledelectronic active devices—typically metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effecttransistors (MOSFETs) or bipolar junction transistors (BJTs)—and a resonantLC filter, commonly referred to as a tank, which stores and exchanges energy between theinductor and thecapacitor. The cross-coupled devices act as differentialtransconductor to compensate the losses of the LC network and sustain an autonomous oscillation.[1][2]

This topology provides a differential output signal and it is widely used to generate sinusoidalsignals in theradio frequency (RF) range, from hundreds of megahertz up to hundreds of gigahertz, particularly inintegrated circuits (ICs) that implement entirefrequency synthesizers,transmitters, orreceivers on a singlesemiconductordie.[3] The classic cross-coupled design (pictured on the right) is characterized by low phase noise and low power dissipation, but has limited frequency range[4] (about 20%).

Operating principle

[edit]

Aparallel LC circuit can naturally generate a sinusoidal signal at itsresonance frequency:

ω0=1LC{\displaystyle \omega _{0}={\frac {1}{\sqrt {LC}}}}

In an ideal lossless case, the oscillation would persist indefinitely. In practice, however, parasiticresistances in the reactive elements dissipate energy cycle after cycle, causing the amplitude to decay and the oscillation to eventually cease. Such losses can be represented by an equivalent resistanceR0{\displaystyle R_{0}} placed in parallel with the LC network.[5] To maintain a stable oscillation over time, these losses must be offset by supplyingenergy to the resonator. A common approach is to place a transconductance element in a positivefeedback configuration. In this topology, the transconductor senses the instantaneousvoltage across the resonator and generates acurrent proportional to the transconductanceGm, injecting energy back into the tank.[5]

Feedback model of an LC oscillator

For sustained oscillation to occur, two fundamental conditions must be satisfied—commonly referred to as theBarkhausen criteria, leading to the conditions:[5]

|GmR0(jωosc)|1{\displaystyle |G_{\text{m}}\cdot R_{0}(j\omega _{\text{osc}})|\geq 1}
ωosc=ω0{\displaystyle \omega _{\text{osc}}=\omega _{0}}

These conditions ensure that the signal regenerates constructively at each cycle. In the start-up phase, the loop gain must be strictly greater than one to allow small perturbations, such asthermal noise, to grow. As the oscillation builds up, nonlinearities in the active device reduce the effective gain to unity, stabilizing the amplitude at a steady value.[5][6]

MOSFET and bipolar based transconductor

[edit]
Cross-coupled LC oscillator with current bias with MOSFET (left) and BJT (right) based transconductor

In integrated circuits, the most commonly used active devices for implementing the transconductance stage are MOSFETs and BJTs. In cross-coupled oscillators, at least two transistors are connected in a cross-coupled configuration to establish positive feedback, effectively generating anegative resistance that compensates for the tank losses. The equivalent transconductance at the start-up is equal togm/2, wheregm is the transconductance of each transistor. For MOSFET based transconductorgm = 2Ibias/(VgsVt), in whichIbias is thebias current,Vgs the voltage between gate and source andVt the threshold voltage of the MOSFET. For bipolar based transconductorgm =Ibias/Vthermal in whichIbias is the bias current whileVthermal is the thermal voltage.[5]

Phase noise

[edit]

Thephase noise of an LC oscillator can be described by a theoretical model first proposed byLeeson:[7]

L(ωm)=12kTR0(1+F)C2ωm2A02/2{\displaystyle {\mathcal {L}}(\omega _{\text{m}})={\frac {1}{2}}\cdot {\frac {kT}{R_{0}}}\cdot {\frac {(1+F)}{C^{2}\omega _{\text{m}}^{2}A_{0}^{2}/2}}}

wherek is theBoltzmann constant,T is the absolutetemperature inKelvin,A0 is the differential oscillation amplitude across the tank,R0 models the tank losses,C is the tank capacitance, andωm is the frequency offset. The factorF, called excess noise factor, accounts for the phase noise introduced by the transconductance stage and depends on the specific topology and technology used.[6]

Leeson's model provides useful results but does not capture the mechanisms by which transistorelectronic noise is converted into phase noise. To account for this, it is necessary to adopt approaches that consider the time-varying nature of the oscillator, such as the Impulse Sensitivity Function (ISF) method.[8]

Figure of merit and efficiency

[edit]

Phase noise is not the only figure of interest in an LC oscillator. Thepower consumption required to achieve a given phase noise level is also a critical parameter. A commonly used figure of merit (FoM) captures this trade-off and is expressed as:

FoM=10log10[L(ωm)PDC(ωmωosc)2]=10log10(kT2)+10log10Q210log10(1+Fη){\displaystyle \mathrm {FoM} =-10\log _{10}\left[{\mathcal {L}}(\omega _{\text{m}})P_{\mathrm {DC} }\left({\frac {\omega _{\text{m}}}{\omega _{\text{osc}}}}\right)^{2}\right]=-10\log _{10}\left({\frac {kT}{2}}\right)+10\log _{10}Q^{2}-10\log _{10}\left({\frac {1+F}{\eta }}\right)}

whereL(ωm){\displaystyle {\mathcal {L}}(\omega _{\text{m}})}denotes the phase noise at an offset frequencyωm, PDC is the power consumption, andω0 is the oscillation frequency. By rearranging the expression, the figure of merit can also be written in terms of key oscillator design parameters, such as the tankquality factorQ, the excess noise factorF, and the efficiencyη.[6]

The overallefficiencyη can be expressed as the product of current efficiencyηI and voltage efficiencyηV. The current efficiencyηI is defined as the ratio between the current injected into the tank at the oscillation frequency and the total current drawn from the supply. The voltage efficiencyηV is defined as the ratio between the single-ended oscillation amplitude (e.g.,A0/2) and the supply voltage. BothF andη depend on the technology and on the specific topology of the cross-coupled oscillator being used.[6][9]

CMOS cross-coupled oscillators

[edit]

InCMOS technology, the most common cross-coupled LC oscillator topologies use either a single or a dual transconductor to provide the negative resistance required to sustain oscillation. In the single-transconductor configuration, one pair of MOSFETs injects current into the tank during only half of the oscillation cycle. This kind of operation is usually referred as class B. In the dual-transconductor configuration—often referred to as complementary class B—nMOS and pMOS transistors are arranged symmetrically to alternately source and sink current, generating a differential square-wave current.

Single transconductor cross-coupled LC oscillator with nmos transistors (left) and complementary transconductor cross-coupled LC oscillator with nmos and pmos transistors (right). Both topologies have an nmos current bias.

In the single-transconductor configuration, the current efficiency isηI = 2/π ≈ 0.64. Thanks to the complementary transconductor it increases toηI = 4/π ≈ 1.27 in the complementary configuration.

As for the voltage efficiencyηV, it is limited by the voltage headroom required by the bias transistor. In a single nMOS configurationηV typically reaches up to 0.66, while in the complementary case it is reduced to around 0.4 due to the voltage headroom required by the complementary structure. The overall efficiencyη is approximately 0.5 in the complementary configuration, while it is slightly lower in the single-transconductor case, where it reaches about 0.42.[10][11]

The excess noise factor of both single and complementary transconducor is equal to:

FnMOS=1+γ+γgmbiasR04{\displaystyle F_{\text{nMOS}}=1+\gamma +{\frac {\gamma g_{m_{\text{bias}}}R_{0}}{4}}}
FCMOS=1+γ+γgmbiasR0,{\displaystyle F_{\text{CMOS}}=1+\gamma +\gamma g_{m_{\text{bias}}}R_{0},}

in whichFnMOS{\displaystyle F_{\text{nMOS}}} is the excess noise factor of the single transconductor topology,FCMOS{\displaystyle F_{\text{CMOS}}} is excess noise factor of the complementary transconductor topology,γ{\displaystyle \gamma } is a parameter dependent on theregion of operation of the MOSFETs (typically below 2) whilegmbias{\displaystyle g_{m_{\text{bias}}}}is the current generator transconductance.[12]

Advanced topologies

[edit]

Various techniques can be employed to reduce the excess noise factor and/or increase the efficiency of the oscillator, with the goal of improving its phase noise performance and overall figure of merit.[6][10]

LC tail filtering

[edit]
Single (left) and complementary (right) transconductor cross-coupled LC oscillator with LC tail filtering and filter capacitance for bias transistor

LC tail filtering is a technique employed in both single- and complementary-transconductor oscillator topologies. It decouples the source voltage of the transistors from the supply, which improves the voltage efficiency. Additionally, it enables the insertion of a capacitor to filter out noise injected by the current source, thereby reducing the excess noise factor.[13][14]

In complementary topologies, this approach can increase the overall efficiency up to approximately 0.8, compared to about 0.5 in configurations without tail filtering.[10]

Class C CMOS oscillator

[edit]

In a class C oscillator, the transistors operate in saturation (e.g. drain-to-source voltage is higher than gate-to-source voltage minus threshold voltage for nMOS), and a capacitor is placed in parallel with the current source to enable more effective current injection into the tank. It allows the current efficiencyηI to approach 1 in a single-transconductor topology. However, operation in saturation limits the maximum achievable oscillation amplitude, i.e. the voltage efficiency.[15] Despite this limitation, the overall efficiency can reach approximately 0.77.[11]

Class D CMOS oscillator

[edit]

In a class D oscillator, the transistors operate as switches, leveraging the advantages of CMOS technology scaling. This mode of operation enables a single-ended oscillation amplitude that can exceed the supply voltage by a factor of approximately three, resulting in a voltage efficiencyηV of about 3.[16] Consequently, the overall efficiency can reach approximately 0.82.[10]

Transformer-based CMOS oscillator

[edit]

Firstly introduced in the class C oscillator, the use of transformers in cross-coupled oscillators implemented in CMOS technology enables the introduction of gain between the drain and gate nodes of the transistors. A properly designed transformer can provide a voltage gain greater than one between its primary side (connected to the drains of the transistors) and its secondary side (connected to the gates). As a result, the gate waveforms are amplified, leading to a reduction in the noise injection from the transistors. This technique has been shown to reduce the excess noise factor due to the transconductor by a factor approximately equal to the gain introduced between these nodes.[17][18][19]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Andreani, Pietro; Bevilacqua, Andrea (2021)."Harmonic Oscillators in CMOS—A Tutorial Overview".IEEE Open Journal of the Solid-State Circuits Society.1:2–17.Bibcode:2021IOJSS...1....2A.doi:10.1109/OJSSCS.2021.3109854.hdl:11577/3405060.ISSN 2644-1349.
  2. ^Razavi, Behzad (2012).RF microelectronics. The Prentice Hall communications engineering and emerging technologies series (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ Munich: Prentice Hall. p. 511.ISBN 978-0-13-713473-1.
  3. ^Abidi, Asad A.; Murphy, David (2025)."How to Design a Differential CMOS LC Oscillator".IEEE Open Journal of the Solid-State Circuits Society.5:45–59.Bibcode:2025IOJSS...5...45A.doi:10.1109/OJSSCS.2024.3524493.ISSN 2644-1349.
  4. ^Nguyen 2015, p. 615.
  5. ^abcdeLacaita, Andrea; Levantino, Salvatore; Samori, Carlo (2007).Integrated frequency synthesizers for wireless systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 74–101.ISBN 978-0-521-86315-5.
  6. ^abcdeSamori, Carlo (2016). "Understanding Phase Noise in LC VCOs: A Key Problem in RF Integrated Circuits".IEEE Solid-State Circuits Magazine.8 (4):81–91.Bibcode:2016ISSCM...8d..81S.doi:10.1109/MSSC.2016.2573979.ISSN 1943-0582.
  7. ^Leeson, D.B. (1966). "A simple model of feedback oscillator noise spectrum".Proceedings of the IEEE.54 (2):329–330.doi:10.1109/PROC.1966.4682.ISSN 0018-9219.
  8. ^Hajimiri, A.; Lee, T.H. (1998). "A general theory of phase noise in electrical oscillators".IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.33 (2):179–194.Bibcode:1998IJSSC..33..179H.doi:10.1109/4.658619.
  9. ^Fanori, L.; Andreani, P. (2013). "Highly Efficient Class-C CMOS VCOs, Including a Comparison With Class-B VCOs".IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.48 (7):1730–1740.Bibcode:2013IJSSC..48.1730F.doi:10.1109/JSSC.2013.2253402.ISSN 0018-9200.
  10. ^abcdBabaie, Masoud; Kuo, Feng-Wei; Chen, Huan-Neng Ron; Cho, Lan-Chou; Jou, Chewn-Pu; Hsueh, Fu-Lung; Shahmohammadi, Mina; Staszewski, Robert Bogdan (2016). "A Fully Integrated Bluetooth Low-Energy Transmitter in 28 nm CMOS With 36% System Efficiency at 3 dBm".IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.51 (7):1547–1565.Bibcode:2016IJSSC..51.1547B.doi:10.1109/JSSC.2016.2551738.hdl:10197/8498.ISSN 0018-9200.
  11. ^abLim, Chee Cheow; Ramiah, Harikrishnan; Yin, Jun; Mak, Pui-In; Martins, Rui P. (2018). "An Inverse-Class-F CMOS Oscillator With Intrinsic-High-Q First Harmonic and Second Harmonic Resonances".IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.53 (12):3528–3539.Bibcode:2018IJSSC..53.3528L.doi:10.1109/JSSC.2018.2875099.ISSN 0018-9200.
  12. ^Murphy, David; Rael, Jacob J; Abidi, Asad A (2010). "Phase Noise in LC Oscillators: A Phasor-Based Analysis of a General Result and of Loaded $Q$".IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.57 (6):1187–1203.doi:10.1109/TCSI.2009.2030110.ISSN 1549-8328.
  13. ^Hegazi, E.; Sjoland, H.; Abidi, A.A. (2001)."A filtering technique to lower LC oscillator phase noise".IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.36 (12):1921–1930.Bibcode:2001IJSSC..36.1921H.doi:10.1109/4.972142.
  14. ^Garampazzi, Marco; Mendes, Paulo M.; Codega, Nicola; Manstretta, Danilo; Castello, Rinaldo (2015). "Analysis and Design of a 195.6 dBc/Hz Peak FoM P-N Class-B Oscillator With Transformer-Based Tail Filtering".IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.50 (7):1657–1668.Bibcode:2015IJSSC..50.1657G.doi:10.1109/JSSC.2015.2413851.hdl:1822/54236.ISSN 0018-9200.
  15. ^Mazzanti, Andrea; Andreani, Pietro (2008). "Class-C Harmonic CMOS VCOs, With a General Result on Phase Noise".IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.43 (12):2716–2729.Bibcode:2008IJSSC..43.2716M.doi:10.1109/JSSC.2008.2004867.hdl:11380/613153.ISSN 0018-9200.
  16. ^Fanori, Luca; Andreani, Pietro (2013). "Class-D CMOS Oscillators".IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.48 (12):3105–3119.Bibcode:2013IJSSC..48.3105F.doi:10.1109/JSSC.2013.2271531.ISSN 0018-9200.
  17. ^Mazzanti, Andrea; Bevilacqua, Andrea (2015). "On the Phase Noise Performance of Transformer-Based CMOS Differential-Pair Harmonic Oscillators".IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.62 (9):2334–2341.Bibcode:2015ITCSR..62.2334M.doi:10.1109/TCSI.2015.2451915.ISSN 1549-8328.
  18. ^Guo, Hao; Chen, Yong; Mak, Pui-In; Martins, Rui P. (2021). "20.1 a 5.0-to-6.36GHz Wideband-Harmonic-Shaping VCO Achieving 196.9dBc/Hz Peak FoM and 90-to-180kHz 1/F3 PN Corner Without Harmonic Tuning".2021 IEEE International Solid- State Circuits Conference (ISSCC). IEEE. pp. 294–296.doi:10.1109/ISSCC42613.2021.9365761.ISBN 978-1-7281-9549-0.
  19. ^Babaie, Masoud; Staszewski, Robert Bogdan (2013). "A Class-F CMOS Oscillator".IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.48 (12):3120–3133.Bibcode:2013IJSSC..48.3120B.doi:10.1109/JSSC.2013.2273823.hdl:10197/8419.ISSN 0018-9200.

Sources

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]

External links

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cross-coupled_LC_oscillator&oldid=1322893354"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp