TheGlobal Engagement Center (GEC) was an agency within theBureau of Global Public Affairs at theUnited States Department of State. Established in 2016, its mission was to lead U.S. government efforts to "recognize, understand, expose, and counter foreign state and non-state propaganda and disinformation efforts aimed at undermining or influencing the policies, security, or stability of the United States, its allies, and partner nations" around the world.[1][2][3] GEC closed in December 2024[1] and was re-organized as the State Department's Counter Foreign Information and Manipulation and Interference Office. In April 2025, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced its closure, stating that the office had wasted taxpayer money and engaged incensorship. Other State Department officials disagreed, calling accusations of censorship "fictitious"[4] and arguing that the center's closure was politically motivated.[5]
Executive Order 13584 of 2011 established the State Department'sCenter for Strategic Counterterrorism Communications (CSCC) to support "agencies in Government-wide public communications activities targeted against violent extremism and terrorist organizations.”[6] Five years later on March 14, 2016,Barack Obama signed Executive Order 13721[7] which renamed CSCC as the Global Engagement Center while retaining its counterterrorism mission.[8][9]
TheNational Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 expanded GEC's mission by giving it the authority to address other foreign propaganda, misinformation, and disinformation operations,[10] following some Members of Congress' call for a stronger response to Russian interference in U.S. elections through propaganda.[11][12] TheNational Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 further expanded GEC's scope of work, including endowing it with a mandate, as reflected in its current mission statement.[13]
The GEC, which operated with a $61 million budget and a staff of approximately 120, shut down in December 2024 when the GOP-led Congress declined to renew its funding.[17] It was re-organized as the State Department's Counter Foreign Information and Manipulation and Interference Office (R/FIMI).[18]
In April 2025, theTrump administration announced a shutdown of GEC's successor R/FIMI, with Secretary of StateMarco Rubio alleging that R/FIMI wasted millions of dollars and engaged in censorship, while crediting Trump officialDarren Beattie for spearheading the shutdown of R/FIMI.[18][19] Beattie's news website Revolver had previously repeatedly criticized R/FIMI for censoring conservatives, while Beattie is married to a Russian woman with links to the Russian government, and he has said that most Western institutions would benefit from being "controlled" by Vladimir Putin.[19][20]
Michael D. Lumpkin led GEC from January 2016 to January 2017.[21][22] According to a 2018 report prepared for the French government, the GEC was predominantly staffed byPentagon employees.[23]Lea Gabrielle served as GEC director from February 11, 2019, to February 19, 2021.[24]
GEC's core work was divided into five interconnected areas, as summarized below:
Analytics and research: Collect data from foreign actors to produce and share analyzes on foreign malign information influence operations with stakeholders within the State Department.
International partnerships: Participate in international coalitions/partnerships with foreign governments to coordinate counter-disinformation analyzes and solutions.
Programs and campaigns: GEC houses teams focused on Russia, China, Iran, and Counterterrorism. It tailors initiatives and coordinates internally within the State Department, across agencies, and with international allies.
Exposure: Coordinate interagency exposure of foreign information influence activities.
Technology assessment and engagement: Host private-sector technology demonstrations, assess counter-disinformation technologies, and identify technological solutions.[26]
In March 2020, then-GEC coordinatorLea Gabrielle testified[27] at aSenate Foreign Relations Committee hearing titled "The Global Engagement Center: Leading the United States Government's Fight Against Global Disinformation Threat."[28] In October 2023, GEC Principal Deputy Coordinator Daniel Kimmage testified at aHouse Foreign Affairs Committee hearing titled "The Global Engagement Center: Helping or Hurting U.S. Foreign Policy."[29]
GEC also issued grants to support research identifying foreign disinformation campaigns.[30] It offered graduate students ofColumbia University School of International and Public Affairs multiple opportunities to collaborate, including on a study examining "Russian active measures on Twitter targeting American audiences with content regarding the Syrian conflict" in Spring 2019,[31] and on a study analyzing seven aspects of China's global influence operations in Spring 2022.[32]
In September 2023, the U.S. State Department publishedGlobal Engagement Center Special Report: How the People’s Republic of China Seeks to Reshape the Global Information Environment.[33][34] In what theAssociated Press called "a first-of-its-kind-report",[35] the State Department accused the Chinese government of using "deceptive and coercive methods" to influence public opinion.[36] The methods discussed included buying content and acquiring stakes in newspapers and television networks outside China; coercing international organizations and media outlets to silence its critics; creating fake personas to spread disinformation; and using repression to shut down social media accounts.[36][35]The New York Times wrote that the accusations "reflect worry in Washington that China’s information operations pose a growing security challenge to the United States and to democratic principles around the world by promoting 'digital authoritarianism.'"[36]
In October 2023, GEC took the unusual step of exposing a nascent disinformation campaign as it had barely gotten off the ground, publicly linking a Pressenza article recycling disinformation about a Russian Orthodox monastery inKyiv,Ukraine, to a covert operation to spread Russian propaganda in Central andSouth America.[37]
Early reactions to the GEC considered it an important component of US response to foreign propaganda and disinformation but criticized its slow start.[38] In 2017, some members of Congress, including RepublicanRob Portman and DemocratChris Murphy, co-sponsors of theFY2017 NDAA, successfully advocated for the GEC to receive a substantial budget increase.[2][39] However, Secretary of StateRex Tillerson delayed the State Department's formal request for the funds, stalling the GEC's work for months.[40] Portman and others suggested that the agency had turned a corner in 2019 when it hired Lea Gabrielle, a former Navy pilot and intelligence officer who worked forFox News, as head of the organization.[41] As of May 2020, GEC had a staff of 120.[41]
In its analysis of GEC's response to theCOVID-19 infodemic,The Cyber Defense Review noted that the agency had chosen to fund partner organizations rather than taking a direct role in fighting disinformation, and that it lacked a social media presence of its own.[42] Explaining that GEC's predecessor agencies – theCenter for Strategic Counterterrorism Communications, the Global Strategic Center, and the Counterterrorism Communication Center – had relied on partner entities to combatISIS propaganda, Major Neill Perry argued that the approach was less effective in countering disinformation targeting American domestic audiences.[42] In addition, Perry expressed concern that Congress had directed theOffice of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) to create yet another agency, the Foreign Malign Influence Response Center (FMIRC), without specifying how it would collaborate and avoid duplication with GEC.[42]
In a December 2023Asia Society report titled "The New Domestic Politics of U.S.-China Relations,"Evan S. Medeiros described the establishment of GEC as a dimension of the "new bureaucratic politics" of U.S. China policy. He wrote: "Although not focused specifically on China, Beijing’s propaganda efforts have been a central focus of its work, including by calling out various disinformation campaigns run by China. The GEC, for example, has been at the forefront of documenting parallel disinformation campaigns by Russia and China about U.S. activities in Ukraine meant to advance the Russian narrative to justify its 2022 invasion.”[43]
Russian state-run English-language media compared the GEC to the "Ministry of Truth" inGeorge Orwell'sNineteen Eighty-Four.[44][41][45] A 2018 article in theAir Force Law Review examined several issues raised by GEC, including possible abridgment offreedom of the press, pointing out that "Under theFirst Amendment, arguably the very existence of a state-controlled entity that pronounces who is and is not 'fake' functions like an unconstitutional license on the press."[44]
In April 2020, the inspector general for the State Department concluded that the GEC lacked safeguards to ensure that independent organizations it was working with were acting appropriately, such as when it funded a project called "Iran Disinfo" which aggressively targeted groups including theNational Iranian American Council.[41] Critics of theTrump administration also cited Trump's "lack of credibility on misinformation" as an impediment to advancing the agency's efforts to combat fake news.[41]
GEC Special Report: Russia’s Pillars of Disinformation and Propaganda, August 2020[48]
Report: RT and Sputnik’s Role in Russia’s Disinformation and Propaganda Ecosystem, January 20, 2022[49]
PRC Efforts To Manipulate Global Public Opinion on Xinjiang, August 24, 2022[50]
Gendered Disinformation: Tactics, Themes, and Trends by Foreign Malign Actors, March 27, 2023[51]
Global Engagement Center Special Report: How the People’s Republic of China Seeks to Reshape the Global Information Environment, September 28, 2023[33]
The Kremlin’s War Against Ukraine’s Children, August 24, 2023[52]
After the GEC's closure and reorganization into R/FIMI[18], Secretary of StateMarco Rubio closed R/FIMI and suggested its files might be made public.[53][54] In response, US SenatorsJeanne Shaheen andChris Murphy wrote a letter to Secretary Rubio on September 18, 2025, expressing that "given Mr. Beattie's history on this issue, we are deeply concerned that such an initiative will use cherry-picked information o promote the baseless conspiracy theory that the GEC sought to 'censor' conservative speech"; they also expressed concerns that the State Department would release personal information related to State Department staff and its partners abroad, leading to harassment or violence against them.[55]
Observers noted that the closure of the GEC coincided with the eradication or weakening of other government guardrails against foreign propaganda and election interference, calling it a victory for partisan media but a defeat for U.S. cybersecurity.[56]
^Jeangène Vilmer, J. B.; Escorcia, A.; Guillaume, M.; Herrera, J. (2018).Information Manipulation: A Challenge for Our Democracies(PDF). Paris, France: Report by the Policy Planning Staff (CAPS) of the Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs and the Institute for Strategic Research (IRSEM) of the Ministry for the Armed Forces. p. 118.ISBN978-2-11-152607-5.Archived(PDF) from the original on August 25, 2023. RetrievedDecember 5, 2023.
