| Cosworth DFV | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Overview | |
| Manufacturer |  Ford-Cosworth |
| Designer | Keith Duckworth Mike Costin |
| Production | 1967–1983 |
| Layout | |
| Configuration | V8,naturally-aspirated, 90° cylinder angle |
| Displacement | 2,987.1 cc (182.28 cu in) |
| Cylinder bore | 85.6742 mm (3.37 in) |
| Piston stroke | 64.77 mm (2.55 in) |
| Cylinder block material | Aluminium alloy |
| Cylinder head material | Aluminium alloy |
| Valvetrain | 32-valve,DOHC, four-valves per cylinder |
| Combustion | |
| Fuel system | Mechanical indirect fuel injection |
| Fuel type | Gasoline |
| Oil system | Dry sump |
| Output | |
| Power output | 400–530 hp (298–395 kW) |
| Torque output | 221–280 lb⋅ft (300–380 N⋅m) |
| Dimensions | |
| Dry weight | 168 kg (370.4 lb) |
| Chronology | |
| Successor | Ford-Cosworth HB |
TheDFV is aninternal combustion engine that was originally produced byCosworth forFormula Onemotor racing. The name is an abbreviation ofDouble Four Valve, the engine being a V8 development of the earlier four-cylinderFVA, which had four valves per cylinder.[1]
Its development in 1967 forColin Chapman'sTeam Lotus was sponsored and funded by major American automotive manufacturerFord. For many years it was the dominant engine in Formula One, with the whole engine program funded by Ford's European division,Ford Europe and engines badged as "Ford" for Formula One championship races. DFVs were widely available from the late 1960s to the mid 1980s and were used by every specialist team in F1 during this period with the exception of Ferrari, Alfa Romeo, Renault, BRM and Matra, who all designed, produced and ran their own engines. Variants of this engine were also used in other categories of racing, includingCART,Formula 3000 andsports car racing.
The engine is a 90°, 2,993 ccV8 with a bore and stroke of 85.67 × 64.90 mm (3.373 × 2.555 in). It reliably produced over 400 bhp, specifically reaching 408 bhp at 9,000 rpm, and 270 ft⋅lbf (370 N⋅m) of torque at 7,000 rpm. By the end of its Formula 1 career, it achieved over 500 bhp, with a peak of 510 bhp at 11,200 rpm.
The 1983 DFY variant had an updated bore and stroke of 90.00 × 58.83 mm (3.543 × 2.316 in), maintaining a displacement of 2,993 cc. It produced 520–530 bhp at 11,000 rpm and 280 ft⋅lbf (380 N⋅m) of torque at 8,500 rpm.
In 1965, theFédération Internationale de l'Automobile, that administeredFormula One racing, agreed to raise the series' maximum engine capacity from 1.5 litres (92 cu in) to 3.0 litres (183 cu in) from 1966. Up until that point,Colin Chapman's successfulTeam Lotus cars had relied on power from fast revvingCoventry Climax engines, but with the change in regulations Coventry Climax decided for business reasons not to develop a large capacity engine.
Chapman approachedKeith Duckworth, previously a gearbox engineer at Lotus but now running his fledglingCosworth company withMike Costin, who commented that he could produce a competitive three-litre engine, given a development budget of £100,000.[2]
Chapman approached theFord Motor Company andDavid Brown ofAston Martin for funding, each without initial success. Chapman then approached Ford of Britain's public relations chief, former journalistWalter Hayes, with whom he had developed a close working relationship from the early 1960s. Since Hayes had joined Ford in 1962 the pair had previously collaborated in the production of the successfulLotus Cortina, introduced in 1963.[2] Hayes arranged dinner for Chapman with Ford employeeHarley Copp, a British-based American engineer who had backed and engineered Ford's successful entry intoNASCAR in the 1950s.[2] Hayes and Copp developed a business plan, which was backed by Ford UK's new chairmanStanley Gillen, and approved by Ford's Detroit head office as a two-part plan:
The project was revealed by Hayes in a PR launch in Detroit at the end of 1965, but the engine was not ready until the third race of the 1967 season, on the 4 June atZandvoort. Its debut proved successful.Graham Hill, who was in the team at the specific request of Ford and Hayes,[2] put his DFV-poweredLotus 49 onpole position by half a second and led for the first 10 laps but was then sidelined by a broken gear in the camshaft drive. Team-mateJim Clark moved up through the field in his identical car and came home to win. However, this dominant performance belied a serious fault in the timing gear.[3] Clark took three more wins that season, but reliability problems left him third in the Drivers' Championship, 10 points behind championDenny Hulme. The progress of the engine was documented in a film produced by the Ford Motor Company's film section, entitled9 Days in Summer.
Initially, the agreement between Ford, Cosworth and Lotus was binding on all parties, and Ford as the funder had no plans to sell or hire the DFV to any other teams. However, it occurred to Hayes that there was no competition: theFerrari engine was initially underpowered; theBRM complex and too heavy; theMaserati unreliable; theHonda overweight; whileDan Gurney'sWeslake motor was powerful but unreliable.[4] Only Brabham'sRepco V8 engine provided a usable combination of power, lightness and reliability, but its age and design left little room for further improvement. Hayes concluded that Ford's name could become tarnished if the Lotus were to continue winning against only lesser opposition, and that they should agree to use the unit in other teams, and hence potentially dominate Formula One.
At the end of 1967, Copp and Hayes gently explained to Chapman that he would no longer have monopoly use of the DFV and in August 1967 it was announced that the power unit would be available for sale, via Cosworth Engineering, to racing teams throughout the world.[5] Hayes released the DFV initially to British teamMatra International, headed byKen Tyrrell withJackie Stewart as a driver. What followed was a golden age, where teams big or small could buy an engine which was competitive, light, compact, easy to work with and relatively cheap (£7,500 at 1967 prices[6] or about £90,000 in 2005 money[7]). The DFV effectively replaced theCoventry Climax as the standard F1 powerplant for the private (mostly British) teams.
Lotus,McLaren,Matra,Brabham,March,Surtees,Tyrrell,Hesketh,Lola,Williams,Penske,Wolf andLigier are just some of the teams to have used the DFV. In 1969 and 1973 every World Championship race was won by DFV-powered cars, with the engine taking a total of 155 wins from 262 races between 1967 and 1985.
The DFV-powered cars won also the Constructor championship, fighting with the Ferrari who won from 1975 to 1977 and in 1979.
The advent ofground effect aerodynamics on the F1 scene in 1977 provided a new lease of life for the now decade-old engine. The principle relied onVenturi tunnels on the underside of the car to create low pressure regions and thus additional downforce. Previously, teams runningFerrari andAlfa-Romeoflat-12 engines had enjoyed a handling advantage due to the low centre of gravity in such a configuration. However, for ground effect, the wide engine was completely the opposite of what was required as the cylinder heads protruded into the area where the Venturi tunnels should have been.
In contrast, the V-configuration of the Cosworth engine angled the cylinders upwards and left ample space under the car for the necessary under-body profile[8] which massively increased downforce and gave more efficient aero balance, thus increasing cornering potential and straight line speed. Ground effect British cars and DFV engines effectively killed off the V12/flat 12 engines of Ferrari and Alfa Romeo which many pundits had believed in the mid-1970s would dominate F1 well into the mid-1980s. Drivers Mario Andretti in1978, Alan Jones in1980, Nelson Piquet in1981 andKeke Rosberg in1982 used a combination of British ground effect chassis and a DFV engine to claim the Drivers' Championship while DFV-powered cars took the Formula 1 Constructors' World Championship in 1978, 1980 and 1981.
The onset of theturbo era in the early 1980s put an end to the DFV's F1 activities, as even with modifications the 15-year-old engine could not hope to compete with the vast power being put out by the new 1.5-litre turbocharged engines. However, in the early days of turbo F1 cars (1979–1982) the Renault, Ferrari and Toleman were unable to offer consistent opposition to the Cosworth DFV British teams. The early turbo Renault, though powerful (particularly so on high altitude tracks such asInterlagos,Kyalami,Jarama,Dijon-Prenois and theÖsterreichring) were much heavier, cumbersome, complicated and significantly, much more unreliable than the British Cosworth DFV teams.
The extra power and torque of a turbo engine put much more strain on the gearbox, driveshafts and brakes on the Renaults and Ferraris, and during the early 1980s the sight of a Renault or Ferrari wilting under the strain of its extra power was a common sight. The turbo engine was also hampered by "throttle lag", a delay in throttle response which made the turbo cars very slow on tight, twisty circuits such as Monaco, Long Beach, Zolder, Montreal, Brands Hatch and Detroit, whereas the normally-aspirated Cosworth DFV enjoyed pin-sharp response and accuracy. Also, the light and agile British cars exploited ground-effect technology so well that even on fast tracks such asBuenos Aires,Silverstone,Hockenheim the DFV engine was able to win. For a few years, between 1977 when Renault debuted the powerful but unreliable turbo engine and 1982 when the DFV-powered teams began to negotiate deals for turbo engines of their own, a competitive equilibrium was established.[9]Michele Alboreto took the DFV's last F1 win in a Tyrrell at theDetroit Grand Prix in 1983, andMartin Brundle was the last person to race in F1 with a DFV, also in a Tyrrell at theAustrian Grand Prix in 1985.
Some Cosworth-using constructors developed their engines in house during a Grand Prix season, such as John Nicholson's Nicholson McLaren operation or Williams F1 using John Judd's workshops to uprate the standard 480 BHP that the DFV was producing in the late 1970s/early 1980s. Uprated pistons, camshafts and valves meant Williams and McLaren's DFVs were producing over 510 BHP at around 11,000 RPM by the early 1980s, which meant the power deficit to the turbocharged Renaults and Ferraris was only around 30–40 BHP in race trim. Since a DFV only needed a 190-litre fuel tank, compared to the 220+ litre sized fuel tank required by a turbo engine, it meant the power to weight ratio of a McLaren MP4 or Williams FW07/08 with their specialist DFV engines were comparable to their turbocharged opponents, albeit with better fuel consumption and much less strain on the rear tyres, gearboxes and rear axle, meaning softer compounds could be used and last longer by both Williams and McLaren, which gave a significant benefit to both grip and tyre durability.
As of mid-1982, 375 engines had been built. The cost of a complete engine at that time, purchased directly from Cosworth, was £27,296, approximately equivalent to £122,000 in 2023.[10]
The DFV was used insportscar racing with some modest success. The design of the crankshaft caused vibrations that resulted in reliability problems in endurance racing. In 1968, new rules for theSports Prototype class limited engine displacement to 3 litres and Ford (UK) sponsored the DFV-poweredFord P68 as their entry under the new rules. However, this car, and its derived sister theP69, failed to finish a single race during the two seasons that they competed. In 1971 a DFV-poweredLigier JS3 was able to finish first and second in two short-distance events, the best DFV-powered Sports Prototype showings to date, but was only able to achieve a non-classified finish atLe Mans after mechanical troubles. The next years would show that even that unsatisfactory result was beating the odds. The DFV came into wider use in 1972, when all purpose-built racers fell under the 3-litre engine limit. Eric Broadley'sLola, having previously focused on the 2-litre smaller class, designed their T280 model fitted with a Cosworth engine, which was very fast though it often failed to finish. Thirteen starts of DFV-powered vehicles at theLe Mans 24 Hours during 1972–74 yielded three finishes, two of which failed to complete 300 laps. The best result for DFV-powered vehicles at Le Mans was in1975, when fuel consumption rules had the field using low power tuning and slower engine speeds, which slowed the race pace and mitigated the DFV's vibration problem. The top three finishers were powered by DFVs, with the Gulf-sponsored Mirage driven byJacky Ickx andDerek Bell finishing first.
1976 saw a slightly faster pace for the Mirage and the DFV-powered De CadenetLola, but they were eclipsed by the new turbochargedPorsche 936, driven by Ickx andGijs van Lennep, in first place. After two years with DFV-powered vehicles failing to run competitive distances, a DFV-poweredRondeau was the surprise winner in the1980 race.Jean Rondeau andJean-Pierre Jaussaud nursed a two lap lead over theJacky Ickx /Reinhold Joest Porsche 908/80 charging back from earlier mechanical setbacks. Another Rondeau occupied the third spot, nine laps behind the winner. In 1981 Rondeau slightly improved on the pace of the previous year but, as in 1976, DFV-powered vehicles were again outclassed by a Porsche 936, driven this time by the old Mirage winning team of Ickx and Bell. The 1981 distance result, 340 laps, was the best ever achieved with the DFV. The DFV faded from relevance over 1982–1984, showing just two finishes of over 300 laps from fourteen starts at Le Mans.
Australian race driver Bap Romano used an ex-F1 Cosworth DFV engine (formerly used byMcLaren) in his Australian designed and builtKaditchaGroup A Sports Car through 1983 and 1984 in theAustralian Sports Car Championships. After finishing 6th in the1983 ASCC, winning the final round of the series, he would go on to dominate the1984 championship. The renamedRomano WE84 won four of the five rounds and in all bar heat two of the opening round when the car was a non-starter due to an accident in the first heat, scored fastest lap while also sitting on pole for every round. The DFV in the Romano was later replaced in late 1984 by the Cosworth DFL engine.
1982 saw the introduction of 3.3 and 3.9 litre DFLs, endurance racing versions of the DFV, in theWorld Endurance Championship. That year, the 3.3 litre variant powered the newRondeau M382 to three podium finishes with a win in the1000 km Monza event and a strong second place standing behind Porsche in season points. The DFLs proved insufficiently reliable forC1 class racing at the 24 Hours of Le Mans, achieving only three finishes in 34 starts during 1982–1984, with none achieving 300 laps. After 1982 the DFLs were never reliable or competitive in the C1 class and finished consistently behind C2 cars at Le Mans. The 3.9 litre version was completely rejected by 1985. The last start for a DFL in the C1 class at Le Mans was in 1988. 1984 saw success for the 3.3 litre version in the fuel-restrictedC2 class, where low power tuning mitigated its reliability issues, with two class wins on the World Championship circuit. The 3.3 litre DFL became the most used engine of the C2 class, achieving four class championships, five class wins at Le Mans between 1985 and 1990 and the best distance of any Cosworth engine at Le Mans, at 351 laps, in 1988. Reliability of the C2 class was still considered unsatisfactory, however, and as the 1980s ended, the issue led the FIA to seek a new formula to replace the C2 class. 1989 saw the introduction of the 3.5 litre DFZ variant as a C1 class engine. It had the honor of being the first Cosworth engine to finish ahead of the C2 winner at Le Mans, but it was an inconsistent finisher and not competitive within the C1 class. It proved a consistent finisher and winner in the FIA Cup class, the low powered replacement of the C2 class, in 1992. The 3.5 litre DFR variant yielded more consistent results as a C1 engine for theSpice team in 1990 and the Euro Racing team in 1991, with two third-place finishes for the former, but they were never able to challenge the Peugeots, Jaguars and Sauber Mercedes for the top spot.
The DFV was also the engine for which theFormula 3000 series was created in 1985, and thus it won every race that year. The DFV and its variants continued racing in F3000 for a decade,Pedro Lamy taking the last win for a DFV in top-class motorsport, atPau in 1993, its 65th F3000 win in 123 races.
The first variant produced from the DFV was a reduced-capacity unit for theAustralia andNew Zealand-basedTasman Series races of 1968–69. The changes between the DFV and DFW specification were limited to a reducedstroke, taking capacity to 2491 cc and reducing power output from the DFV's 420 bhp (313 kW; 426 PS) in1967 to ~360 bhp (268 kW; 365 PS) (after winning theSurfers Paradise round of the1968 Tasman Series,Jim Clark told that other than lacking the top end power of the DFV, there really wasn't a big difference in performance between the DFV and DFW).[11][12] In Tasman Series racing, other 2.5L engines that the DFW was generally up against were the Australian madeRepco V8, theAlfa Romeo V8 (as seen in Alfa'sT33/2endurance racingsports car), a 2.5L version of theBRM V8 engine, the 2.4LFerrari V6, and the older 2.5LCoventry Climax FPF, the Australian versions of which were actually made under licence by Repco. On tighter tracks such asWigram (NZ) andWarwick Farm (AUS), there was also the smaller capacity (1.6 L (1,598 cc))Cosworth FVA to contend with.
The DFW is was the smallest capacity variant of the DFV that was officially produced by Cosworth. The engine was a direct replacement for its DFV parent inLotus 49s. The small engine proved just as competitive as the larger version; and Jim Clark took four race victories in 1968, though Clark also noted after the Surfers round on a track that suited higher powered cars, the lower power of the DFW was not quite suited to the full size Lotus 49T built for Formula One (highlighting the lack of top end punch along with the heavier F1 car, for the first half of the Surfers race Clark was in a dogfight for the lead with the smaller, more nimbleFormula 2 chassisFerrari ofChris Amon and its 285 bhp (213 kW; 289 PS) V6 engine, a scenario they would repeat when Clark beat Amon by just 0.1 seconds to win the1968 Australian Grand Prix at another noted power circuit,Sandown inMelbourne). The DFW also saw one win forPiers Courage driving aBrabham BT24 forFrank Williams Racing, and two victories forJochen Rindt in the1969 Tasman Series (Rindt had replaced Clark atLotus after theScotsman's tragic death in a Formula 2 race atHockenheim just over a month after winning the Tasman in 1968).Derek Bell drove a DFW version of theBrabham BT26 to second place in the1970 New Zealand Grand Prix, and for the 1971 Tasman Series previous championChris Amon drove a DFW-powered version of his current Formula One chassis, theMarch 701, to another podium finish, but in both years the Formula One-derived engine was largely outmatched byFormula 5000 entrants with their 5.0L Repco-Holden andChevrolet V8's producing some 480–500 bhp (358–373 kW; 487–507 PS) in 1971.
After the demise of the 2.5L component of theTasman Formula following the 1971 season, the four DFW engines were converted back to DFV specification.
The DFV had three major upgrades over its life in the top formula, with the development of first the DFY and then the DFZ, followed by a major redesign to produce the final DFR type.
| Cosworth DFY[13] | |
|---|---|
| Overview | |
| Manufacturer | Ford-Cosworth |
| Production | 1983–1985 |
| Layout | |
| Configuration | V8,naturally-aspirated, 90° cylinder angle |
| Displacement | 3.0 L (2,992.6 cc) |
| Cylinder bore | 90 mm (3.5 in) |
| Piston stroke | 58.8 mm (2.3 in) |
| Cylinder block material | Aluminium alloy |
| Cylinder head material | Aluminium alloy |
| Valvetrain | 32-valve,DOHC, four-valves per cylinder |
| Combustion | |
| Fuel system | Electronic and mechanical indirect fuel injection |
| Fuel type | Gasoline |
| Oil system | Dry sump |
| Output | |
| Power output | 510–530 hp (380–395 kW) |
| Torque output | 280 lb⋅ft (380 N⋅m) |
| Dimensions | |
| Dry weight | 150 kg (331 lb) |
With the introduction of turbocharged engines towards the end of the 1970s, Cosworth's naturally aspirated DFV began to lose its predominance. In an attempt to recover some of the performance deficit Cosworth designerMario Illien reconfigured the cylinder aspect ratio to allow the engine to rev more freely, and combined this with a narrow-angle valve set-up andNikasil Aluminium liners. The changes upped power output to ~520 bhp,[11] and between 11000-12000 RPM but this was not sufficient to keep pace with the turbo cars at most tracks, and it was only through a modicum of luck thatMichele Alboreto was able to take what would prove to be the DFV-family's final F1 victory, at the1983 Detroit Grand Prix. The DFY lived on with back-marker teams until the end of the1985 season, when Cosworth switched their efforts to supporting the new turbocharged Ford GBA V6.
| Cosworth DFZ[13] | |
|---|---|
| Overview | |
| Manufacturer | Ford-Cosworth |
| Production | 1987–1988 |
| Layout | |
| Configuration | V8,naturally-aspirated, 90° cylinder angle |
| Displacement | 3.5 L (3,494 cc) |
| Cylinder bore | 90 mm (3.5 in) |
| Piston stroke | 68.65 mm (2.7 in) |
| Cylinder block material | Aluminium alloy |
| Cylinder head material | Aluminium alloy |
| Valvetrain | 32-valve,DOHC, four-valves per cylinder |
| Combustion | |
| Fuel system | Electronic and mechanical indirect fuel injection |
| Fuel type | Gasoline |
| Oil system | Dry sump |
| Output | |
| Power output | 575–590 hp (429–440 kW) |
| Torque output | 320 lb⋅ft (434 N⋅m)[14] |
| Dimensions | |
| Dry weight | 155 kg (342 lb) |
The announcement at end of the1986 season that turbocharged cars would be banned from1989, and the introduction of theJim Clark Cup andColin Chapman Trophy championships for naturally aspirated cars for1987, prompted Cosworth to revive their elderly engine design. This resulted in the DFZ, essentially an updated version of the final DFY design. However, the capacity increase for the new 3.5Lnaturally aspirated formula running alongside the 1.5L turbos in 1987 allowed Cosworth to increase the power output of the unit to 575 bhp (429 kW; 583 PS).[11] The engine was intended as a temporary measure to tide smaller teams over until the turbos were banned at the end of the1988 season.Tyrrell,AGS,March,Lola andColoni chassis were all powered by Cosworth in 1987.Jonathan Palmer of Tyrrell eventually won the drivers' Jim Clark Cup, and his team took the constructors' laurels in the Colin Chapman Trophy. The engine remained in service with minor teams until the end of 1988 and development saw a slight power increase to 590 bhp (440 kW; 598 PS). The DFZ did not race in Formula One beyond 1988 as the general release of the DFR engine made it obsolete.
The engine did however have a second brief lease of life in sportscar racing, when the FIA announced plans to transition towards using 3.5 L F1-style engines inGroup C in the early 1990s. In 1990Spice Engineering adapted its existing Group C design to take a 3.5L DFZ instead of the previously used 3.3 L DFL engine. However the new engine caused significant problems due to vibration, which resulted in the breakage of components and a significant increase in running costs -Gordon Spice estimated that the DFZ-powered car was about four times more expensive to run than the DFL-engined one.[15] The DFZ was successfully used in FIA Cup class racing in 1992, with that low-powered class being the last appearance of the DFV family in sportscar racing.
| Cosworth DFR[13] | |
|---|---|
| Overview | |
| Manufacturer | Ford-Cosworth |
| Production | 1988–1993 |
| Layout | |
| Configuration | V8,naturally-aspirated, 90° cylinder angle |
| Displacement | 3.5 L (3,494 cc) |
| Cylinder bore | 90 mm (3.5 in) |
| Piston stroke | 68.65 mm (2.7 in) |
| Cylinder block material | Aluminium alloy |
| Cylinder head material | Aluminium alloy |
| Valvetrain | 32-valve,DOHC, four-valves per cylinder |
| Combustion | |
| Fuel system | Electronic indirect fuel injection |
| Fuel type | Gasoline |
| Oil system | Dry sump |
| Output | |
| Power output | 580–630 hp (433–470 kW) |
| Torque output | 320–400 lb⋅ft (434–542 N⋅m)[14] |
| Dimensions | |
| Dry weight | 155 kg (342 lb) |
| Chronology | |
| Predecessor | Cosworth GBA |
| Successor | Ford-Cosworth HB |
From1987Benetton had been operating as the works Ford team, essentially taking over the role from the now defunctHaas Lola team. With the abandonment of turbocharging it was clear that the venerable DFV/Y/Z design was nowhere near being competitive with far newer offerings fromHonda andRenault who were buildingV10 engines for 1989 and beyond, andFerrari who were building what they knew, aV12 (Lamborghini entered F1 in 1989 and like Ferrari, also went down theV12 path). To counter this, drastic changes were made for the DFR of 1988. Although superficially a DFV-design, almost the only feature carried over from previous versions into the DFR was the basic 90° V8 engine architecture. The DFR became available to all customers in 1989, with the Benetton team also using this engine until the1989 British Grand Prix. The DFR struggled on until the 1991 season finally being eclipsed by the higher revving abilities of newpneumatic valve gear engines such as the HB, and was last used in that year's Australian Grand Prix by the Footwork, Fondmetal, Larrousse and Coloni teams, nearly a quarter of a century after the DFV's first race. By the time of its demise, continued improvement had pushed the DFR power output to nearly 630 bhp (470 kW; 639 PS),[11] 60% higher than the original 1967 DFV.
The DFR enjoyed success in 1988 with Benetton. The team was the best performed non-turbo team of the season finishing third in the Constructors' Championship behind Ferrari (turbo) and the all-conqueringMcLaren-Honda.Thierry Boutsen recorded five podium finishes andAlessandro Nannini scored two podiums. The DFR was also the most powerful non-turbo of the season with a reported 620 bhp (462 kW; 629 PS). This compared to the 590 of the DFZ and the newJudd V8 with a reported 600 bhp (447 kW; 608 PS). This still lagged behind the Honda and Ferrari turbos which were producing over 650 bhp (485 kW; 659 PS) each.
The 3.5 L DFR engine was later used in theAllard J2X-CGroup Csports car, in 1992.[16][17][18][19][20]
| Cosworth DFX[21][22] | |
|---|---|
| Overview | |
| Manufacturer | Ford-Cosworth |
| Production | 1976–1987 |
| Layout | |
| Configuration | 90°V8 |
| Displacement | 2.6 L (2,643 cc) |
| Cylinder bore | 85.67 mm (3.373 in) |
| Piston stroke | 57.3 mm (2 in) |
| Valvetrain | 32-valve,DOHC, four-valves per cylinder |
| Compression ratio | 11.2:1 |
| Combustion | |
| Turbocharger | Cosworth |
| Fuel system | Electronic fuel injection |
| Fuel type | Gasoline |
| Oil system | Dry sump |
| Output | |
| Power output | 720–840 hp (537–626 kW) |
| Torque output | 340–490 lb⋅ft (461–664 N⋅m)[14] |
A 2.65 Lturbocharged version of the DFV was developed privately by theVels Parnelli Jones team for the 1976USACIndyCar season, in the face of opposition from Duckworth.[23] The Parnelli-Cosworth car took its first victory at the1976 Pocono 500, the fifth race of the season, driven byAl Unser.[23] Unser and his Cosworth-powered Parnelli took two further victories before the end of the year, in Wisconsin and Phoenix, and finished the championship in fourth position.
Duckworth had been a guest of the Vels Parnelli team during the Pocono victory, asParnelli Jones andVel Miletich wanted to establish the team as the North American distributor for the turbocharged, Indycar-specification engine.[23] However, shortly after the maiden race victory Cosworth poached two key engineers from the Parnelli team and set up facilities inTorrance, California, to develop and market the engine themselves.[23] Henceforth it became known as theDFX. It went on to dominateAmerican Indy car racing in much the same way the DFV had dominated Formula One. The engine won theIndianapolis 500 ten consecutive years from 1978 until 1987, as well as winning all USAC andCART championships between 1977 and 1987 except for one. For a brief time in the early 1980s, some of the DFX engines werebadged asFords. The DFX powered 81 consecutive Indy car victories from 1981 to 1986, and 153 victories total. By the time it was replaced, the DFX was developing over 840 bhp (630 kW).[11]
In 1986GM financed the BritishIlmor firm to build a competitor to the DFX inAmerican Indy car racing.Mario Illien'sIlmor-Chevrolet Indy V-8, which owed not a little to the DFY of five years earlier, quickly took over dominance of the sport.
Ford responded by commissioning Cosworth to redesign the DFX to include a number of DFR improvements. In 1989, they introduced an updated "shortstroke" version of the Indy car engine which would be referred to as the "DFS" ("S" forshort stroke).,[24] and theNikasil Aluminium liners, adopted on DFY in 1983.
The engine was fielded by two teams in its first season: Kraco Racing (Bobby Rahal) andDick Simon Racing (Arie Luyendyk), and its development was an effort to regain dominance of the sport. AtIndy, neither car qualified in the front two rows, but both started in the top ten. On race day, both drivers dropped out with engine failures. Rahal won one race in 1989 at theMeadowlands. However, the Kraco team merged withGalles at season's end, dropped the program, and switched to Chevrolets.
In 1990, the factory development was continued byScott Brayton andDominic Dobson,[25] but neither won any races. The engine was utilized by other CART teams in 1991–1992, and was retired after the introduction of theFord Cosworth XB with only one victory, that being Rahal's in 1989.
| Cosworth DFL[26][27][28] | |
|---|---|
| Overview | |
| Manufacturer | Ford-Cosworth |
| Production | 1981–1984 |
| Layout | |
| Configuration | V8,naturally-aspirated, 90° cylinder angle |
| Displacement | 4.0 L (3,954.4 cc) 3.3 L (3,298 cc) |
| Cylinder bore | 90 mm (3.5 in) |
| Piston stroke | 77.7 mm (3.1 in) 64.8 mm (2.6 in) |
| Cylinder block material | Aluminium alloy |
| Cylinder head material | Aluminium alloy |
| Valvetrain | 32-valve,DOHC, four-valves per cylinder |
| Compression ratio | 12.0:1-12.5:1 |
| Combustion | |
| Fuel system | Electronic indirect fuel injection |
| Fuel type | Gasoline |
| Oil system | Dry sump |
| Output | |
| Power output | 490–700 hp (365–522 kW) |
| Torque output | 340–510 lb⋅ft (461–691 N⋅m)[14] |
In 1981 a variant of the DFV named the DFL (forlong-distance) was produced specifically for use in the newGroup Csports car racing class. The engine was modified to larger capacity 3,298 cc (201.3 cu in) and 3,955 cc (241.3 cu in) versions (despite technically being 4.0 Litres, the 3955 cc version was always referred to as a 3.9 Litre), both with wider bore and longer stroke dimensions than the standard DFV. Both versions were plagued by reliability issues worse than with the DFV they were supposed to replace. The 3.3 L version poweredRondeau to the second points standing in theWorld Sportscar Championship season of 1982, but it was insufficiently reliable to be competitive in the longer events. Thereafter, the 3.3 L DFL in the C1 class was unsuccessful, with those who managed to actually finish invariably ending up behind C2 cars. The new fuel-restricted C Junior (C2) class in 1983 opened a niche for successful use of the 3.3 L version, where low power tuning brought its reliability to a level where it could succeed. In the C2 category it powered many privateer cars, mostlySpices andTigas, to class victories around the world, including five at the24 Hours of Le Mans between 1985 and 1990. The 3.9 L version never achieved the same success as its smaller sibling, with most users finding incurable engine vibrations and it was out of competition use by 1985. It was used to power the famousFord Supervan andSupervan 2 promotional projects, as well as the Australian designed and builtRomano WE84 in theAustralian Sports Car Championship, which ran the 3.0 L DFV in the championship before upgrading to the 3.9 L DFL for the1984 World Endurance Championship round at theSandown Raceway inMelbourne, where it finished 100 laps behind the class winner.
In August 1982, a turbocharged version of this engine was tested briefly on theBrands Hatch Circuit mounted on aFord C100.[29][30][31]
In 1973Norton approached Cosworth to help build a new engine that could be used for both street and racing motorcycles. The idea was to create a 750-cc parallel-twin version of the DFV, with liquid-cooling, 4-valve head, dual overhead cams and flat combustion chambers.[32] Expected power was to be 65–75 hp for road bikes, and at least 100 hp for the racing bikes.[32]
The P86 had a bore of 85.6 mm and a stroke of 64.8 mm, giving a capacity of 746 cc.[32] A timing belt was used to drive the cams, rather than the gear train used on the DFV.[32] The P86 shared the same combustion chamber, head designs, pistons and rods from the DFV.[32]
Norton specified that the P86 must run through a single carburettor source, which led to a 360° firing interval, with both pistons rising and falling as a pair.[32] As this led to increased vibration, a dual counterbalancing system was developed, in conjunction with a heavy flywheel.[32] In an engine weighing 195 lb, 75 lb of that was a rotating mass inside, which was a lot of inertia to be driven.[32]
The P86 had downdraught ports like the DFV, but used two Amal carburettors, rather than the fuel injection of the DFV. The carburettors and angle in relation hampered fuel delivery and power output.[32]
Dyno testing showed that the P86 developed 90 hp, down on the projected 100 hp, while the massive amount of rotating weight inside the engine (counter balancers and flywheel) hindered throttle response.[32] The overall weight of the engine meant that it was never going to be as light as equivalent engines from Japanese manufacturers. The belt driven timing system was inaccurate, while the belts themselves were fragile and prone to breaking.[32]
The P86 was fitted in a Norton 'frameless' chassis that made its racing debut in 1975, but results were poor, due to the lack of power. When Norton Villiers Triumph was split up in 1976, an offshoot company called NVT Engineering disbanded the testing and racing departments, and the existing bikes and spare engines (30 in total) were sold off.[32]
The P86 made a brief comeback 10 years later at the 1986 Battle of the Twins, held at theDaytona International Speedway. The Quantel entry featured one of the surviving P86 engines – reworked, fitted with fuel injection and bored out to 823 cc.[32] Ridden by Paul Lewis, the Quantel finished 2nd, and would win the event in 1988 ridden by Roger Marshall.[32][33]
DFV normally aspirated 3.0-litre 90° V8
Formula One Drivers' Champions (12):
Formula One Constructors' Champions (10):
Le Mans 24 Hours winners (2):
Formula 3000 Champions (6):
DFX turbocharged 2.65-litre 90° V8
Indy 500 winners (10):
USAC Champions (3):
CART Champions (9):
 |
(key) (Races inbold indicate pole position) (Races initalics indicate fastest lap)
