Let bemeasurable functions on ameasure space The sequence is said toconverge globally in measure to if for everyand toconverge locally in measure to if for every and every with
On a finite measure space, both notions are equivalent. Otherwise, convergence in measure can refer to either global convergence in measure[1]: 2.2.3 or local convergence in measure, depending on the author.
Global convergence in measure implies local convergence in measure. The converse, however, is false;i.e., local convergence in measure is strictly weaker than global convergence in measure, in general.
If, however, or, more generally, if and all the vanish outside some set of finite measure, then the distinction between local and global convergence in measure disappears.
If isσ-finite and (fn) converges (locally or globally) to in measure, there is a subsequence converging toalmost everywhere.[1]: 2.2.5 The assumption ofσ-finiteness is not necessary in the case of global convergence in measure.
If is-finite, converges to locally in measureif and only if every subsequence has in turn a subsequence that converges to almost everywhere.
In particular, if converges to almost everywhere, then converges to locally in measure. The converse is false.
If is-finite, Lebesgue'sdominated convergence theorem also holds if almost everywhere convergence is replaced by (local or global) convergence in measure.[1]: 2.8.6
If andμ isLebesgue measure, there are sequences of step functions and of continuous functions converging globally in measure to.
If and are inLp(μ) for some and converges to in the-norm, then converges to globally in measure. The converse is false.
If converges to in measure and converges to in measure then converges to in measure. Additionally, if the measure space is finite, also converges to.
There is atopology, called thetopology of (local) convergence in measure, on the collection of measurable functions fromX such that local convergence in measure corresponds to convergence on that topology.This topology is defined by the family ofpseudometricswhereIn general, one may restrict oneself to some subfamily of setsF (instead of all possible subsets of finite measure). It suffices that for each of finite measure and there existsF in the family such that When, we may consider only one metric, so the topology of convergence in finite measure is metrizable. If is an arbitrary measure finite or not, thenstill defines a metric that generates the global convergence in measure.[2]
Because this topology is generated by a family of pseudometrics, it isuniformizable.Working with uniform structures instead of topologies allows us to formulateuniform properties such asCauchyness.