| Constitutional Declaration of the Syrian Arab Republic | |
|---|---|
| Overview | |
| Original title | الإعلان الدستوري للجمهورية العربية السورية |
| Jurisdiction | Syria |
| Ratified | 13 March 2025 (2025-03-13) |
| Date effective | 16 March 2025 (2025-03-16) |
| System | Unitarypresidential republic |
| Government structure | |
| Branches | Three (executive, legislative and judiciary) |
| Head of state | President |
| Chambers | Unicameral (People's Assembly) |
| Executive | President as head of government |
| Judiciary | Supreme Judicial Council,Supreme Constitutional Court |
| Federalism | No |
| First legislature | TBD |
| First executive | 29 March 2025 (2025-03-29) |
| Signatories | Ahmed al-Sharaa |
| Supersedes | Constitution of 2012 |
| Full text | |
|
|---|
| ||
|---|---|---|
Personal
Political offices
President of Syria Incumbent
| ||
| Part of a series on theSyrian civil war |
| Syrian peace process |
|---|
History |
Secondary concerns |
States directly involved in the Peace Process |
Constitutional Declaration of the Syrian Arab Republic (Arabic:الإعلان الدستوري للجمهورية العربية السورية), also known as2025 Interim Constitution of Syria, is the currentprovisional constitution of Syria, approved by PresidentAhmed al-Sharaa. It establishes the constitutional framework for a five-yeartransition period.
After thefall of the Assad regime,Hassan Abdul Ghani, spokesman for theMilitary Operations Command, announced the repeal of the2012 Ba'athist Syrian constitution. Al-Sharaa then declared that he would issue a "constitutional declaration" as a legal framework until a new constitution was established.
On 2 March 2025, he formed a committee to draft a new constitutional declaration to oversee the country's transition, and on 13 March, he signed the constitutional declaration, which will remain valid for five years.
The constitutional reform occurred amid ongoing instability, including threats of territorial fragmentation frompro-Assad remnants,Druze militias,an Israeli military invasion, sectarian tensions andmassacres inAlawite-populated regions and remaininginternational sanctions on Syria.
The2024 Syrian opposition offensives, codenamed "Deterrence of Aggression," were led byHay'at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) and supported by alliedTurkish-backed groups in theSyrian National Army. These offensives resulted in the rapidfall ofBashar al-Assad'sgovernment, ending five decades ofAssad family rule that began whenHafez al-Assad assumed power in 1971 under theBa'ath Party following acoup d'état.[1] As arebel coalition moved closer to Damascus, reports indicated that Bashar al-Assad had fled the capital by plane to Russia, where he joined his exiled family and was grantedpolitical asylum by theRussian government.[2] After his departure, opposition forces announced their victory on state television. At the same time, Russia'sMinistry of Foreign Affairs confirmed his resignation and departure from Syria.[3][4]
On 29 December 2024,Syria TV reported that preparations were underway for a National Conference of 1,200 representatives for which the date has not been decided yet.Syria TV said that during the National Conference, the constitutional drafting committee would be announced and that during the conference, thePeople's Assembly of Syria and allarmed factions including HTS would be dissolved, leading to the restructuring of a new national army.[5] Later that day, Syria's then-de facto leaderAhmed al-Sharaa stated that elections could take up to 4 years to be organized, with the need to conduct a census beforehand.[6][7]
After theregime change, al-Sharaa was formally appointed as thepresident of Syria by the Syrian General Command for the transitional period during theSyrian Revolution Victory Conference in Damascus on 29 January 2025. Before this, he had served as thede facto leader following the fall of the Assad regime.[8] After he was appointed president, al-Sharaa, in his first address on 31 January 2025, stated that he would issue a "constitutional declaration" to serve as a "legal reference" until a new constitution was established.[9]
After a meeting of the armed groups that took part in the offensive against the Assad regime, these groups simultaneously agreed to abolish the2012 constitution of Ba'athist Syria and initiate the drafting of a replacement document. While the Assad regime's fall was celebrated by many Syrians, the subsequent establishment ofIslamist leadership generated uncertainty among the country's religious minorities, with many communities expressing reluctance to accept Damascus's authority in their regions.[10] During the Syrian Revolution Victory Conference,Hassan Abdul Ghani, spokesman for theMilitary Operations Command, announced the repeal of the 2012 Syrian constitution.[11]
On 12 February 2025, the caretaker government announced the formation of a preparatory committee for the then upcomingSyrian National Dialogue Conference, comprising seven members: Hassan al-Daghim, Maher Alloush, Mohammed Mastet, Youssef al-Hijr,Mustafa al-Moussa,Hind Kabawat, and Houda Atassi.[12] The conference faced criticism for inadequate representation of Syria's diverse communities and civic organizations.[10] On 2 March 2025, President al-Sharaa declared the establishment of a committee with the task of drafting a new constitutional declaration to guide the country's transition following the ousting of the Assad regime.[13] On 13 March 2025, President al-Sharaa ratified the interim constitution, which will be valid for five years.[14][15]
The constitution sets apresidential system with the executive power at the hands of the president who appoints the ministers,[16] without the position ofprime minister.[17] This constitution enshrines Islamic law as the main derivation ofjurisprudence while preserving freedoms of opinion and expression.[18] ThePeople's Assembly has been established to serve as the interim parliament during the five-year transition, overseeing the drafting of a new permanent constitution.[10] The president selects one-third of the People's Assembly members and appoints judges to theconstitutional court without requiring parliamentary approval. The remaining two-thirds are elected through commissions supervised by a committee designated by the president.[19][20]
The constitution retains certain elements from its predecessor, including the requirement that the president's religion beIslam and thatIslamic jurisprudence serve as the primary legislative foundation. The constitution promised equality for all citizens regardless of demographic and religious backgrounds. The currentSyrian Armed Forces was designated as a professional national institution, prohibiting unauthorized armed groups from existing regionally. Public support for theformer Assad regime was criminalized.[10][21]
The constitution initially designated the original 1:2 independence flag as theprimary flag; however, after the addition of 10 more articles and revisions of some articles, the final text ultimately retained the 2:3 proportion.[22][23]
United Nations Special Envoy to SyriaGeir Pedersen offered qualified support for the declaration, expressing hope that it would contribute to restoringrule of law and facilitate a comprehensive transition process. Pedersen additionally called for independent investigations into recent sectarian violence andattacks on Alawite civilians and urged Syria's interim leadership to collaborate with UN authorities on these matters.[24][20]
Syrian journalist Saba Madour characterized the speech restrictions against denying Assad's crimes as advancing historical truth and supporting justice for victims of his regime, though she noted additional measures against Assad-sympathetic parties would be necessary for full accountability.[24]
TheSyrian Democratic Council delivered sharp criticism, claiming that al-Sharaa was repeating Assad's constitutional approach. The council declared the document illegitimate and inconsistent with previously negotiated agreements between al-Sharaa andSyrian Democratic Forces leadership. They warned of increased violence,sectarianism, andauthoritarianism in Syria.[25] They specifically warned that emphasizingSharia law in governance could precipitate renewed instability throughout the country. Authorities in the mostlyKurdishDemocratic Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria (DAANES) rejected the declaration for failing to acknowledge Syria's diverse ethnic composition. Their criticism focused on the document's perceived continuation ofBa'athist policies through different means and its inadequate recognition of the country's diverse demographic components.[24][20] The formal critique came just two days after DAANES had signed an agreement with Damascus's new authorities regarding integration into the Syrian state.[26]
Druze spiritual leaderHikmat al-Hijri characterized the transitional government as "extremist" and categorically rejected possibilities for consensus. Al-Hijri questioned the government's legitimacy and suggested it could faceinternational justice proceedings following the massacres against Alawite civilians occurring concurrently with the ratification of the constitution.[24]
On 14 March 2025, hundreds of Kurdish demonstrators protested the recently signed constitutional declaration inQamishli, which they claimed failed to address the aspirations of Syria's minority populations.[26] Critics feared that the extensive powers granted to the transitional president could establish foundations for renewedauthoritarian governance. Scrutiny was also given to the five-year transition period, with critics questioning whether al-Sharaa would adhere to this timeline given perceived breaches of previous commitments. The declaration's establishment of Islamic jurisprudence as the primary legislative source generated criticism from those concerned about implications for Syria's pluralistic society.[24][27]
Protesters condemned further the constitution's lack of explicit recognition of Syria's minority groups, including Kurds, Alawites,Christians, and Druze communities, which many perceived as contradicting the declaration's stated guarantee offreedom of belief andlegal equality for all citizens in favor of aSunni-dominated state.[24][26][27] Demonstrators chanted slogans calling for the "downfall of al-Julani," using President al-Sharaa'snom de guerre during the civil war. Additional protests took place inAmuda, with protesters advocating for a "democratic andfederal" governance system to allow for Kurdish state autonomy.[26][27]