The Convention on the Constitution (Irish:An Coinbhinsiún ar an mBunreacht)^[1] was established in Ireland in 2012 to discuss proposedamendments to the Constitution of Ireland.^[2][3] More commonly called simply theConstitutional Convention, it met for the first time 1 December 2012 and sat until 31 March 2014.^[4] It had 100 members: a chairman; 29 members of theOireachtas (parliament); four representatives ofNorthern Ireland political parties; and 66randomly selectedcitizens of Ireland.

The convention was mandated to consider eight specified issues, and also selected two others to discuss.The government was not obliged to proceed with any amendment proposal, but committed to respond formally to each recommendation and debate it in the Oireachtas. As of December 2018^[update], the government had formally responded to all nine of the convention's reports, and put three of its proposals toreferendum. Two of those referendums took place on 22 May 2015:to mandate legal same-sex marriage andto reduce the age of eligibility for the presidency from 35 to 21. The former was accepted, and the latter rejected. A third referendum was passed on 26 October 2018to remove the offence of blasphemy from the Constitution.

The convention was established pursuant toresolutions in each house of theOireachtas in June 2012.^[5][6][7] It was to meet on at least eight Saturdays over the course of a year.^{[8][9][10][11]} The inaugural meeting was on 1 December 2012 atDublin Castle,^[10] and working sessions begin in late January 2013,^[11] with later sessions being held elsewhere in the state and in Northern Ireland.^[8][9]

Theplenary sessions were open to the public, andstreamed live. The convention's secretariat was called the Constitutional Convention Office, led bycivil servants from theDepartment of the Taoiseach.^[5][12] The Secretary was Art O’Leary, previously Director of Committees, Information and Communications of the Oireachtas, who was on secondment to the Department of the Taoiseach.^[13][14][15] The research was led by the Academic and Legal Research Group, made up ofDavid Farrell,Jane Suiter, Eoin O'Malley, Clodagh Harris and Lia O'Hegarty.

The establishing resolution set the following agenda items:^[5]

1. reducing thepresidentialterm of office to five years and aligning it with thelocal andEuropean elections;
2. reducing thevoting age to 17;
3. review ofthe Dáil electoral system;
4. givingcitizens resident outside the State the right to vote inpresidential elections at Irish embassies, or otherwise;
5. provision forsame-sex marriage;
6. amending the clause on the role ofwomen in the home and encouraging greater participation of women in public life;
7. increasing the participation ofwomen in politics;
8. removal of the offence of blasphemy from the Constitution; and
9. following completion of the above reports, such other relevant constitutional amendments that may be recommended by it

The first two items were to be considered first, with recommendations due for report to the Oireachtas within two months of the convention's first meeting.^[5] The other specified issues were considered in turn until November 2013, and two other issues were then chosen, Dáil reform andEconomic, social and cultural rights.^[16]

The chairman was appointed by the Government.^[5] Finding a suitable willing candidate took longer than expected.^[8] On 24 October 2012, it was announced that the chairman would beTom Arnold, an economist who is chief executive of the charityConcern and chair of the trust which runsThe Irish Times newspaper.^[17] Arnold is being paid for his work, and was to step down from his role at Concern in 2013 as the convention's workload increases.^[18]

In January 2014, Arnold addressed the Seanad on the convention's work to date. He listed the principles under which it operated as openness, fairness, equality of voice, efficiency, and collegiality.^[19]

The 66 random citizens were chosen by apolling company to reflect the age, regional, and gender balance of the electorate.^[10] For each of the 66, a similar-profile alternate was also selected.^[10]

In the case of citizen members, only their names andcounty orDublin postal district were published, rather than their full postal address.^[20] This was agreed after the polling company, Behaviour and Attitudes, reported that some of those selected were worried about being "bombarded" bylobbyists andpressure groups.^[21]

Thirty-three places were reserved for members of thelegislatures of theRepublic of Ireland (Oireachtas) andNorthern Ireland (Northern Ireland Assembly). Six parties in the Northern Ireland Assembly were each invited to send one representative.^[22] Four accepted, while theDemocratic Unionist Party andUlster Unionist Party declined, regarding the convention as internal to the Republic.^[23] The remaining places, 29 in the event, were divided between the Oireachtas groups so as to be "impartially representative of the Houses".^[5] Each Oireachtas group is represented, roughly proportional to their total numbers in both houses (Dáil andSeanad), including the Dáiltechnical group and the Seanadindependent group.Sinn Féin has a joint delegation from both legislatures.^[24]

In the 2007–2011 Oireachtas (30th Dáil and23rd Seanad) the joint committee on the constitution produced a report on the electoral system which recommended that the issue be discussed by a "Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform" and sketched out the structure of such an assembly.^[31]

Proposals for constitutional reform were in the main parties'manifestos for theFebruary 2011 general election.^[32]Fine Gael proposed a "Constitution Day" series of referendums and acitizens' assembly on electoral reform.^[33]Fianna Fáil also proposed a citizen's assembly.^[34] TheLabour Party,Sinn Féin, and theGreen Party each proposed the drafting of new constitution, respectively by a 90-member "constitutional convention",^[35] an "all-Ireland Constitutional Forum",^[36] and a "Citizens Assembly".^[37] Fine Gael and Labour produced a Programme for Government in March andformed a coalition government.^[2] The coalition's Programme said:^[2][38]

We will establish a Constitutional Convention to consider comprehensive constitutional reform, with a brief to consider, as a whole or in sub-groups, and report within 12 months on the following:

• Review of our Dáil electoral system.
• Reducing the presidential term to five years and aligning it with the local and European elections
• Provision for same-sex marriage.
• Amending the clause on women in the home and encourage greater participation of women in public life.
• Removing blasphemy from the Constitution
• Possible reduction of the voting age.
• Other relevant constitutional amendments that may be recommended by the Convention.

Fianna Fáil leaderMicheál Martin commented "The Constitutional Convention appears to be Fine Gael's Citizen's Assembly but with Labour's preferred title".^[39] Noel Whelan wrote inThe Irish Times in 2012, "The programme for government did not define what it meant by a constitutional convention, did not detail its likely composition and was silent on what would happen to any recommendations."^[32]

Also in 2011, a group of academics set up a participatory democracy initiative called "We the Citizens", which in June 2011 ran a trial citizens' assembly of 100 randomly selected citizens at theRoyal Hospital Kilmainham.^[40]

In February 2012, the government proposed that the convention would have 100 members, as follows:^[2]

• a chairperson "of exceptional ability with a high degree of public acceptability"
• 66 ordinary citizens selected at random from theelectoral register (on the model of acitizens' assembly^[41])
• one member nominated by eachpolitical party in Northern Ireland. The precise number would depend on which parties accepted the offer: someIrish republican parties have practisedabstentionism, whileUlster unionist parties did not accept invitatations to previous Dublin fora — theNew Ireland Forum (1983–84) and theForum for Peace and Reconciliation (1994–2002).
• the balance from members of theOireachtas proportion to party strength.

The plan did not envisage direct participation bysocial partners or otherinterest groups,^[2] but they would be able to make written submissions.^[42] The government also proposed that the first two items for consideration would be lowering the voting age from 18 to 17, and reducing the President's term of office.^[2]

Issues upon which the government had already committed to holding a referendum would not be within the convention's remit.^[43]

Fianna Fáil,Sinn Féin and the Dáiltechnical group discussed the proposals in March.^[44] They reported back to the government in April,^[45] and the government responded in June.^[46][47] In regard to acting on the convention's recommendations, the response stated:^[46]

The Government will commit to giving a public response, through the Oireachtas, to each recommendation from the Convention within four months. It will arrange for a debate in the Oireachtas on that response in each case. In the event the Government accepts a recommendation that the Constitution be amended, the Government's public response will include a timeframe for the holding of a referendum.

On 19 June 2012, the Seanad passed a Fianna Fáil motion that the government'sproposal to abolish the Seanad should be referred to the convention.^[48] Three Labour senators (John Kelly,James Heffernan, andDenis Landy) defied the party whip to support the motion.^[48][49]

Aresolution establishing the Convention in the names of the Taoiseach and Tánaiste was passed in the Dáil on 10 July 2012:^[5] A similar resolution was passed by the Seanad on 12 July.^[6][7] Originally one hour was allocated for its debate; senators spent 90 minutes debating procedural motions about whether to extend the time to two hours,^[7][50] after which the resolution was passed without debate.^[7][51]

The Electoral (Amendment) Act 2012^[52] was introduced to allow the electoral register to be used to provide the names of the citizen members of the convention.^[53] While existing law allows the register to be used for any "statutory purpose", the convention was not established bystatute.^[54] The bill passed all stages in the Dáil on 11 July^[55] and in the Seanad on 12 July,^[56] and signed by the President on 18 July.^[52][53]

Although in June the Taoiseach envisaged the Convention beginning work in September,^[57] he said in October there was a delay because of the difficulty of finding a chairperson.^[8] The initial resolution specified that the convention would complete its business within 12 months of its first meeting, hence by 1 December 2013.^[5][10] In August 2013, the chairman asked for an extension, which was granted by the government and then retrospectively approved by a resolution on 29 January 2014, extending its term until 31 March 2014.^[58][4]

The convention's budget was included under theDepartment of the Taoiseach; as such theannual budget made provision for it and the following year's report of theComptroller and Auditor General gave the amount actually spent. Fourcivil servants from the Department of the Taoiseach worked for the convention.^[59] The total cost for three years was €1.367m.^[60]

Tom Arnold summarised the convention's working methods thus:^[63]

The Convention met over 10 weekends of a day and a half. Each meeting had three components: presentation by experts of papers which had been circulated in advance; debate between groups advocating on either side of an issue; and roundtable discussions involving facilitators and notetakers. On Sunday morning the members considered again the discussions of the previous day and voted on a ballot paper which reflected the details of the debate.

The first plenary session took place over the weekend of 26 and 27 January 2013. The topics of deliberation of this first session included, among other things, lowering the voting age, reducing the length of the presidential term of office, and aligning presidential elections with those for local authorities and the European Parliament. The following are some of the more important results from the first plenary session.^[89] Of the delegates who were present and voted, 52% voted in favour of reducing the voting age, while 47% voted against any such reduction.^[90] 38% of delegates voted that, if the voting age were to be reduced, it should be reduced to 17; 48% voted in favour of it being reduced to 16. As for the issue of making changes related to theoffice of the president, 57% voted against and 43% voted in favour of a reduction in the presidential term. 80% of delegates cast their vote against aligning presidential with local and European elections. 94% of delegates voted in favour of giving citizens a greater say in the nomination of presidential candidates.

The second plenary session took place over the weekend of 16 and 17 February 2013. The topics of deliberation of this second session included, among other things, amending theConstitution to place a duty on the Irish State to enhance women's participation in politics and public life, and altering Article 41.2.1 of theConstitution related to women in the home.^[91] 50% of delegates voted against and 49% in favour of placing a positive duty on the State to take action to increase women's participation in politics and public life. 97% of delegates voted in favour of the following statement: “Leaving aside the Constitution, would you like to see more government action to encourage greater participation of women in politics and public life?” 89% of delegates agreed that theConstitution should be amended to include “gender-inclusive” language. 62% of delegates supported and 37% were against theConstitution being amended to include an “explicit provision on gender equality”. 88% of delegates disagreed that Article 41.2.1 should be left unchanged. 98% of delegates voted that were Article 41.2.1 to be changed, it should be made “gender-neutral” to include other careers in the home.

The terms of reference allowed the convention to consider "other issues, time permitting". These were originally scheduled for discussion on 30 November–1 December 2013, just before the anniversary of its inaugural ceremonial meeting.^[92] A May 2013 motion to consider theproposed abolition of the Seanad was defeated.^[93]

The convention announced on 14 October 2013 a series of meetings at which the general public was invited to suggest topics for the convention to consider. The meetings took place between 23 October and 25 November, in Cork, Galway, Waterford, Dublin, Sligo, Athlone, and Monaghan. These meetings supplement the pre-existing facility to submit online proposals, of which "a couple of thousand" had been received by the time of the announcement.^[94]

In December 2013, two topics were chosen: Dáil reform and Economic, Social and Cultural (ESC) rights.^[16] These were discussed in February 2014.^[16]

In February 2014, the convention recommended for inclusion in the Constitution the following ESC rights:right to housing;social security; essentialhealth care;disability rights;linguistic andcultural rights; and rights covered in theInternational Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.^[88]

Although the resolution required the government to respond officially within four months of receiving a report from the convention, this deadline was missed for the fourth and subsequent reports, for which no formal response was made by the time the Dáil adjourned for its summer recess on 17 July 2014.^[95] The Taoiseach apologised and blamed the delay on the time taken by civil servants to analyse the reports prior to their being considered by the cabinet.^[95][96] He stated that "Obviously, the Government will not be able to hold all the referendums and must make a decision on what ones it should hold in conjunction with the marriage equality referendum next spring."^[96]

In November 2015, Kenny responded toSeán Ó Fearghaíl:^[97]

I have given an undertaking — I might need the Deputy's help — to set aside time in the remaining weeks of this Dáil session for a proper debate here on the outstanding reports from the Constitutional Convention. Some of the issues it raised actually required quite a deal of work in different Departments. I have given that undertaking and I hope to be able to honour it.

In December 2015, Kenny accepted responsibility for the delay again.^[98] Responses to the four remaining reports were delivered on 14 January 2016 byjunior ministersPaul Kehoe andAnn Phelan.^[79]

Noel Whelan described the February 2012 proposal as "something that is one partOireachtas committee and two partsfocus group, with an advisory role only and which will, at least initially, deal with what are essentially insignificant constitutional provisions".^[32]

Fintan O'Toole in June 2012 compared the convention to theCitizens Union, a reformist political organisation whichTammany Hall did not bother suppressing so long as did not threaten its hegemony.^[99] Twenty NGOs produced an open letter calling for the convention to examinehuman rights.^[100][101]

In the debate on the July Dáil resolution, opposition politicians criticised the composition, agenda, and limited power of the proposed Convention.^[5][102] Later in July, thePatrick MacGillsummer school inGlenties had a seminar with academics and politicians discussing the convention.^[103]

AnIrish Times editorial called the Convention "all form and little substance".^[104] An editorial in theIrish Independent described it as "unelected and powerless".^[105]Stephen Collins wrote thatthe November 2012 referendum on children's rights, with low turnout and unexpectedly high No-vote, suggested "putting such relatively minor issues [as those of the Convention] to the people in a referendum could easily rebound".

Somecivil society groups complained that they ought to have been directly represented at the convention, instead of being expected to make written submissions and hope for an invitation to address one of its meetings.^[106] Fears expressed by commentators included that legislator members would control the process to the detriment of the citizen members, and that the demographic averaging of the membership would reduce input from marginalised minority groups.^[107]

Matthew Wall ofSwansea University wrote in July 2013 that he was impressed by the convention's operation and the substance of its reports, and hopeful that the government would not simply reject any recommendations it found inconvenient.^[108]

In January 2015,Harry McGee ofThe Irish Times wrote, "Only two of 18 recommendations for constitutional change made by the Convention on the Constitution are to be put to referendum."^[109] In March 2015, David Farrell commended the level of public engagement with the convention and its efficient use of its small budget, but said its credibility was undermined by the government's dismissive responses.^[110] Fintan O'Toole similarly praised the convention's work, and suggested the government's tepid response would increase public cynicism with politics.^[111]

In November 2016,David Van Reybrouck commended the Constitutional Convention and its successor theCitizens' Assembly as models that other European countries could usefully imitate.^[112]

Taoiseach Enda Kenny said in June 2015 that "While there was unanimous support for a second convention in the [Convention's final] report, it was acknowledged that this is an exercise that can only be achieved once in the lifetime of any Dáil".^[78]

In the buildup to2016 general election, various politicians proposed changes toIrish abortion law, including repeal of theEighth Amendment. In November 2015, Kenny promised "a Citizen's Convention on the constitution, or whatever title would be appropriate" to address the issue.^[113][114]

TheFine Gael–independent minority government formed after the 2016 election committed to establishing "a Citizens' Assembly, within six months, and without participation by politicians, and with a mandate to look at a limited number of key issues over an extended time period."^[115] The Assembly will not be restricted to constitutional issues, but three such issues specifically mentioned are the Eighth Amendment,fixed term parliaments, and "the manner in which referenda are held (e.g. should ‘super referendum days’, whereby a significant number of referenda take place on the same day, be held)."^[115]

• Second Republic (campaign group)

• Suteu, Silvia (18 May 2015)."Constitutional Conventions in the Digital Era: Lessons from Iceland and Ireland".Boston College International and Comparative Law Review.38 (2):251–276. Retrieved8 June 2018.

• 2013-2014 – Convention on the Constitution archive on theCitizens' Assembly website

• Constitution of Ireland
• 2012 in Irish politics
• Amendments of the Constitution of Ireland
• Constitutional conventions (political meeting)
• Electoral reform in the Republic of Ireland
• 2012 establishments in Ireland
• 2014 disestablishments in Ireland
• Blasphemy law in Ireland
• Citizens' assemblies

• CS1: unfit URL
• CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list
• Use dmy dates from April 2022
• Use Hiberno-English from July 2022
• All Wikipedia articles written in Hiberno-English
• Articles containing Irish-language text
• Articles containing potentially dated statements from December 2018
• All articles containing potentially dated statements