Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Connecticut Colony

Coordinates:41°43′05″N72°45′05″W / 41.71803°N 72.75146°W /41.71803; -72.75146
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
British colony in North America (1636–1776)

Connecticut Colony
1636–1776
Map of the Connecticut, New Haven, and Saybrook colonies
Map of the Connecticut,New Haven, andSaybrook colonies
StatusColony of England (1636–1707)
Colony of Great Britain (1707–1776)
CapitalHartford(1636–1776)
New Haven(joint capital with Hartford, 1701–76)
Common languagesEnglish,Mohegan-Pequot, andQuiripi
Religion
Congregationalism(official)[1]
GovernmentSelf-governing colony
Governor 
• 1639-1640
John Haynes (first)
• 1769-1776
Jonathan Trumbull (last)
LegislatureGeneral Court
History 
• Established
March 3, 1636
January 14, 1639
• Royal Charter granted
October 9, 1662
• Part of theDominion of New England
1686-89
• Independence
July 4, 1776
CurrencyConnecticut pound
Preceded by
Succeeded by
Saybrook Colony
New Haven Colony
Connecticut
Today part ofUnited States
 Connecticut

TheConnecticut Colony, originally known as theConnecticut River Colony, was an English colony inNew England which became the state ofConnecticut. It was organized on March 3, 1636 as a settlement for aPuritan congregation of settlers from theMassachusetts Bay Colony led byThomas Hooker. The English secured their control of the region in thePequot War. The colony eventually absorbed the neighboringNew Haven andSaybrook colonies. It was part of the briefDominion of New England. The colony's founding document was theFundamental Orders of Connecticut, which has been called the first written constitution of a democratic government, earning Connecticut the nickname "The Constitution State".[2]

History

[edit]

Prior to European settlement, the land that would become Connecticut was home to theWappinger Confederacy along the western coast and theNiantics on the eastern coast. Further inland were thePequot, who pushed the Niantic to the coast and would become the most important tribe in relations with colonists. Also present were theNipmucs andMohicans, though these two tribes largely lived in the neighboring states ofMassachusetts andNew York respectively.[3] The first European to visit Connecticut was Dutch explorerAdriaen Block, who sailed up the Connecticut River with his yachtOnrust.[4][5] Accordingly, as the first Europeans to explore Connecticut, the Dutch claimed the land as part ofNew Netherland and negotiated a land purchase of 20 acres along the river from Wopigwooit, the Grand Sachem of the Pequot in 1633. The Dutch would establish a trading post named Kivett's Point and a redoubt namedFort Good Hope, the future sites ofSaybrook and Hartford respectively.[6][7][8]

English settlement

[edit]

In 1631, a group ofsachems from the Connecticut valley led by Wahquimacut visitedPlymouth Colony and Boston, asking both colonies to send settlers to Connecticut to fight the Pequot. Massachusetts governorJohn Winthrop rejected the proposal butEdward Winslow, governor of Plymouth was more open, traveling to Connecticut in person in 1632.[9] Winslow, along withWilliam Bradford would later travel to Boston to convince the leaders of Massachusetts Bay to join Plymouth in constructing a trading post on the Connecticut River before the Dutch could. Winthrop rejected the offer, calling Connecticut "not fit to meddle with" citing hostile Indians and the difficulty of moving large ships into the Connecticut River.[10][11][12]

Despite the Bay Colony's refusal to join the venture, Plymouth sent abark led by William Holmes to establish a trading post on the Connecticut. Besides the English settlers, they took some of the original sachems of the area to prove the validity of their claim. As they passed Fort Good Hope they were threatened by the Dutch, a threat ignored by Holmes. Holmes proceeded a few miles up river and constructed a trading post on the modern site ofWindsor.[13][14] Hearing of the English activities, New Netherland governorWouter Van Twiller dispatched 70 men to dislodge the English. The Dutch would find the English well prepared to defend themselves and left, seeking to avoid bloodshed.[15] Meanwhile,John Oldham led a group of men from the Bay Colony to the river to see Connecticut for themselves. They returned with accounts of plentiful beaver, hemp, and graphite. A year later, Oldham would lead a group of settlers to found the town ofWethersfield.[13][16]

By 1635, Massachusetts' English population had grown immensely and it was clear there was not enough land for the settlers. Particularly eager to leave the crowded Bay colony were the residents ofNewtown. The founder of Newtown,Thomas Dudley was frequently at odds with Winthrop, including anger at the choice of Boston as the colony's capital and refusal to support the construction of a fort in Boston.[17] Dudley sent one Thomas Hooker, Newtown's pastor to Boston to resolve the latter dispute, but the resentment of Winthrop remained.[18][19] After Dudley replaced Winthrop as governor in May 1634, the issue of Hooker's congregation's desire for removal to Connecticut was raised in theGeneral Court. Opponents of the removal feared the impact of a large exodus of Massachusetts population and that the geographic division would foster disunity. A charismatic preacher like Hooker was also likely to draw future settlers from Massachusetts as well.[20] Ultimately the General Court swayed the Newtowners with a grant of land within Massachusetts.[20] This proved unsatisfactory, but removal was nonetheless delayed for two years.[21][22]

Thomas Hooker and his people traveling

Despite the refusal of Hooker's request for removal, settlers continued to pour into the valley. In May 1635 the Saybrook Colony was established at the mouth of the Connecticut River.[23] Considerable amounts of emigrants from Massachusetts also settled in the recently established town of Wethersfield.[24] Plymouth's settlement of Windsor also found itself swamped by settlers fromDorchester who took over the settlement. The issue was resolved when the Dorchester settlers agreed to pay the Plymouth settlers for the land appropriated.[25] Finally in 1636 the arrival of a new group of settlers allowed Hooker's congregation to sell their homes and set off on the journey to Connecticut on the May 31.[26]

Hooker's group of around a hundred settlers and as many cattle soon arrived at the Connecticut River and established the town of Newtown near the Dutch fort. This name would not last however, as it was soon renamed Hartford afterHertford, the hometown of settlerSamuel Stone.[27] In May 1638 Thomas Hooker delivered a sermon on civil government. Inspired by this sermon the settlers sought to create a constitution for the colony. The resulting document, the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut, was likely mostly drafted byRoger Ludlow, the only trained lawyer in the colonies. The document was adopted in January 1639 and formally united the settlements of Hartford, Windsor, and Wetherfield together and has been called the first written democratic constitution.[2][28][29] Under the new constitution,John Haynes was elected governor with Ludlow as deputy governor. Owing to a restriction against governors seeking office in consecutive years, Haynes would alternate the office of governor withEdward Hopkins every year until 1655.[30] Shortly after the Fundamental Orders were established, the nearby New Haven colony organized its own government.[31]

Pequot War

[edit]
Main article:Pequot War

When Fort Good Hope was constructed, the Dutch specified in their treaty with the Pequot that the trading post was to be open to all tribes. Ignoring this, the Pequot attacked a rival tribe attempting to trade. The Dutch retaliated by kidnapping the sachem of the Pequot, Tatobem, and holding him for ransom. After the Pequot paid the ransom, the Dutch gave them Tatobem's corpse. The Pequot retaliated for this by attacking an English ship, believing it to be Dutch. The ship's captain, John Stone, and his crew were killed by the Pequot.[32] A Pequot envoy was sent to Massachusetts to explain the misunderstanding. The envoy told the English about the mistaken identity of the ship. When asked to turn over the killers, the envoy claimed all but two of the killers had died of a recent smallpox epidemic and they lacked the authority to turn over the two survivors. The Pequot further claimed the killing was justified as Stone had captured two Pequots and mistreated them.[33] WhenJohn Gallup was sailing toLong Island he spotted apinnace belonging to John Oldham, its deck covered with Indians. When Gallup attempted to board the ship to investigate, a fight ensued, with Gallup victorious. The colonists blamed the Narragansett for the killing, warningRoger Williams to be careful. The Narragansett leadersCanonicus andMiantonomoh were able to reassure the colonist, claiming that the culprits not killed by Gallup were hiding among the Pequot.[34]

Depiction of the attack on Fort Mystic

After this, a group of ninety men led byJohn Endecott and his captainsJohn Underhill and Nathaniel Turner was sent from Massachusetts to the Pequot's territory to demand the return of the murderers of both Stone and Oldham. The force first sailed to Block Island, but the Indians evaded them there, and the force left with the only casualty inflicted on the villagers being the burning of the island's empty villages.[35] When the forces arrived in Pequot territory, they were told that the murder was committed by none other thanSassacus, grand sachem of the Pequot. The Pequot also claimed to be unable to distinguish the Dutch from the English. Disbelieving these claims and seeing there were no women or children among the Pequot, Endecott attacked, beginning the war.[36] The Pequot responded by besieging Saybrook and attacking Wethersfield, where they would kill nine and take two women hostage.[37] The women were daughters of William Swaine and would later be rescued by the Dutch.[38]

Connecticut sent a force of ninety men, led byJohn Mason. The force was joined by sixtyMohegans led byUncas and came to Saybrook, where a group of Massachusetts men led by Underhill joined them. On May 26, 1637, the group, encamped outside a fortified Pequot village on theMystic River,launched a surprise attack at dawn. The English charged into the village, set it on fire, and formed a ring around the stockades to kill anyone attempting to escape. The Indian allies formed a second ring to catch anyone who managed to escape the first. Hundreds of Pequots died, many of them women and children.[39]

Their spirits broken, many of the Pequot attempted to flee west. Mason, accompanied byIsrael Stoughton pursued a group of three hundred Pequots to a swamp near modernFairfield, where theykilled and captured a great number of them. Sassacus was able to escape to theMohawks, who immediately killed him and his party, sending his scalp to Boston.[40][41] With the Pequots vanquished theTreaty of Hartford was signed between Connecticut, the Mohegans, and the Narragansett, granting the Connecticut settlers the exclusive right to the former Pequot land and dissolving the Pequot as both a political and cultural entity, with surviving Pequots made to assimilate into the other tribes.[42]

Consolidating the colony

[edit]
Governor John Winthrop Jr.

The Pequot War had made clear the difference in needs between Connecticut in Massachusetts clear. During the conflict, Connecticut favored a more cautious policy than Massachusetts.Lion Gardiner, commander ofSaybrook Fort noted that Connecticut would face the brunt of the damages of the conflict while Massachusetts was safe in the Bay. Connecticut asserted its status as a separate colony when at the conclusion of the war it renounced all treaties between the Narragansett and Massachusetts and began conducting Indian diplomacy on its own terms.[20]

With the outbreak of theEnglish Civil War, English support for the Saybrook Colony dried up. The colony's governor,George Fenwick negotiated a deal to sell the colony to Connecticut in 1644.[43] Fenwick returned to England and served with distinction underOliver Cromwell.[44] Inspired by the successes of colonial cooperation during the Pequot War, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Plymouth, and New Haven formed theNew England Confederation to mutually defend the colonies against the Dutch, French, and Indians.[45][46] Before leaving for England, Fenwick, along with Hopkins, served as Connecticut's first commissioners to the Confederation.[47][48] Connecticut's membership in the Confederation also meant it sent troops to fight inKing Philip's War, though Connecticut itself was minimally impacted.[49]

Like its fellow Puritan colonies, Connecticut welcomed Cromwell's victory in the civil war The new English government, however, soon caused issues for Connecticut. The Confederation negotiated theTreaty of Hartford defining the border between New Netherland and the English colonies, but the government in England refused to ratify it.[50] Tensions with the Dutch were inflamed by theNavigation Act 1651, restricting foreign trade with the colonies. These tensions culminated in theFirst Anglo-Dutch War.[51] The war's outbreak enabled Connecticut to seize Fort Good Hope in 1653.[52]

After therestoration of the Stuart monarchy, many in Connecticut feared their colony'sPuritanism and lack of a royal charter would lead toCharles II curtailing the colony's self-government. GovernorJohn Winthrop the Younger was sent to England in 1662 where he successfully obtained a charter. The charter was quite egalitarian, with Connecticut being one of two colonies to havefreemen elect both the governor and members of the legislature.[a][53][54] The charter also granted Connecticut extensive land claims, defining its borders as theNarragansett Bay, thePacific Ocean, the southern border of Massachusetts and the40th parallel north.[55] When representatives of Connecticut traveled to New Haven to show them that they were to be annexed into Connecticut, they initially met strong opposition. This opposition faded in 1664 whenNew Netherland was seized and renamedNew York after its proprietor, theRoman CatholicDuke of York. New York's eastern boundary was defined as the Connecticut River, putting New Haven within the claims of both New York and Connecticut. Unwilling to be ruled by a Catholic royalist, New Haven relented and agreed to join Connecticut.[56][57] The aforementioned seizure of New Netherland also ended Connecticut's claims onLong Island, as whenCaptain John Scott took the island he claimed it not for Connecticut but for himself.[55]

Dominion of New England

[edit]
Hiding the charter in the oak

The Duke of York would ascend to the throne as King James II and VII. As one of his first acts, he would consolidate the English colonies fromWest Jersey toMaine into theDominion of New England. SirEdmund Andros would be appointed governor of the new united colony. Andros demanded that Connecticut hand over its charter as it was no longer a separate colony. GovernorRobert Treat attempted to delay handing over the charter for several months, but on October 31, 1687, Andros came to Hartford to retrieve the charter in person. Treat proceeded to give a speech well into the evening on the importance of the charter. Suddenly, a strong gust of wind came through the door, blowing out the candles. By the time the candles were relit, the charter had vanished, safely hidden away in a nearby oak tree by one Joseph Wadsworth.[58][59] The tree, which became known as theCharter Oak would endure as a symbol of Connecticut for generations.[60] Andros replaced Puritan officials withAnglicans and imposed heavy taxes. His salary of £1,200 exceeded the entire annual expenditure of Massachusetts' former government. When James II was overthrown in theGlorious Revolution, Andros initially attempted to suppress the news. Word did get out, and the colonistsoverthrew the dominion casting its government as crypto-Catholic supports of James II and themselves as loyal to the newProtestant monarchs ofWilliam III andMary II. The dominion's short-lived experiment in centralized government ended and Connecticut, along with all the other colonies, had its charter restored.[61]

Later history

[edit]
See also:History of Connecticut

In 1701,New Haven was designated co-capital with Hartford. At the first legislative session in New Haven to create a college for the colony, with Saybrook as the site andAbraham Pierson as the first rector. Pierson would run the college from his home inKillingworth until his death in 1707, when it was finally moved to Saybrook. Saybrook would soon prove to be too remote and New Haven was able to beat out other communities for the site of the college in 1716. Two years later, whenElihu Yale made a significant donation to the college, it was renamedYale College in his honor.[62]

Connecticut played a key role in theFirst Great Awakening. On July 8, 1741, Connecticut-bornJonathan Edwards famously delivered his sermon "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God" inEnfield in whatOla Elizabeth Winslow termed "the height of revival excitement."[63] The revivals also divided the colony betweenOld and New Lights with Old Lights being skeptical of the revival and New Lights in support of it. This religious division developed into a political division, with the two groups feuding over a law against itinerant preachers passed by Old Light politicians.[64]

TheConnecticut Courant, the oldest continuously published newspaper in the United States, was founded in Hartford in 1764.[65]

Connecticut's population was staunchly in support of the American Revolution, with a fifth of the state's male population serving in the war.Jonathan Trumbull was the only colonial governor to support thepatriots.Nathan Hale, the first American spy, also hailed from the colony.[66]

Demographics

[edit]

The colony was largely homogeneous, the vast majority of settlers were of English descent and the colony had only Protestant churches.[53]The original colonies along the Connecticut River and in New Haven were established by separatistPuritans who were connected with theMassachusetts andPlymouth colonies. They heldCalvinist religious beliefs similar to the English Puritans, but they maintained that their congregations needed to be separated from the English state church. They had immigrated toNew England during theGreat Migration. In the middle of the 18th century, the government restricted voting rights with a property qualification and a church membership requirement.[67] Congregationalism was theestablished church in the colony by the time of theAmerican War of Independence until it was disestablished in 1818.[68]

Historical population
YearPop.±%
16401,472—    
16504,139+181.2%
16607,980+92.8%
167012,603+57.9%
168017,246+36.8%
169021,645+25.5%
170025,970+20.0%
171039,450+51.9%
172058,830+49.1%
173075,530+28.4%
174089,580+18.6%
1750111,280+24.2%
1760142,470+28.0%
1770183,881+29.1%
1774197,842+7.6%
1780206,701+4.5%
Source: 1640–1760;[69] 1774[70] includesNew Haven Colony (1638–1664) 1770–1780[71]

Economic and social history

[edit]

The economy began with subsistence farming in the 17th century and developed with greater diversity and an increased focus on production for distant markets, especially the British colonies in theCaribbean. The American Revolution cut off imports from Britain and stimulated a manufacturing sector that made heavy use of the entrepreneurship and mechanical skills of the people. In the second half of the 18th century, difficulties arose from the shortage of good farmland, periodic money problems, and downward price pressures in the export market. In agriculture, there was a shift from grain to animal products.[72] The colonial government attempted to promote various commodities as export items from time to time, such ashemp,potash, and lumber, in order to bolster its economy and improve its balance of trade with Great Britain.[73]

Connecticut's domestic architecture included a wide variety of house forms. They generally reflected the dominant English heritage and architectural tradition.[74]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^The other was Rhode Island.

References

[edit]
  1. ^Barck & Lefler 1958, p. 398.
  2. ^ab"Early History".CT.gov.
  3. ^Bingham 1962, p. 6-7.
  4. ^Bingham 1962, pp. 2–5.
  5. ^"Adriaen Block".The Society of Colonial Wars in the State of Connecticut.General Society of Colonial Wars.
  6. ^Bingham 1962, p. 10-11.
  7. ^"History of Old Saybrook".Saybrook History. Old Saybrook Historical Society.
  8. ^"House of Hope | A Tour of New Netherland".
  9. ^Stiles 1859, p. 9.
  10. ^Bingham 1962, pp. 12–13.
  11. ^Winthrop 1908, p. 103.
  12. ^Bradford 2008, pp. 370–372.
  13. ^abBingham 1962, p. 14
  14. ^Stiles 1859, pp. 11–12.
  15. ^Carpenter & Arthur 1854, p. 32.
  16. ^Taylor 1979, pp. 3–4.
  17. ^Bingham 1962, p. 17.
  18. ^"Preface".Records of the Church of Christ at Cambridge in New England, 1632-1830. Boston, E. Putnam. 1906. p. iii.
  19. ^Bingham 1962, pp. 19–20.
  20. ^abcDurge, Neal T. (September 2018). "Repairing the Breach: Puritan Expansion, Commonwealth Formation, and the Origins of the United Colonies of New England, 1630–1643".The New England Quarterly.91 (3):382–417.JSTOR 26497581.
  21. ^Walker 1891, p. 83.
  22. ^Bingham 1962, p. 20.
  23. ^Engstrom, Hugh R. Jr. (1973)."Sir Arthur Hesilrige and the Saybrook Colony".Albion: A Quarterly Journal Concerned with British Studies.5 (3):157–168.doi:10.2307/4048260.JSTOR 4048260.
  24. ^Adams, Sherman W. (1904).The history of ancient Wethersfield, Connecticut. Grafton Press. p. 21.
  25. ^Bingham 1962, pp. 24–25.
  26. ^Walker 1891, pp. 91–92.
  27. ^"History of Early Hartford".Society of the Descendants of the Founders of Hartford.
  28. ^Besso, Michael (2012)."Thomas Hooker and His May 1638 Sermon".Early American Studies.10 (1):194–225.doi:10.1353/eam.2012.0002.JSTOR 23546686.
  29. ^"The Fundamental Orders of Connecticut".Connecticut History. CTHUmanities. 2023.
  30. ^"John Haynes".Museum of Connecticut History. 1999.
  31. ^Calder, Isabel M. (1930)."John Cotton and the New Haven Colony".The New England Quarterly.3 (1):82–94.doi:10.2307/359461.JSTOR 359461.
  32. ^DeForest, John W. (1851).History of the Indians of Connecticut : from the earliest known period to 1850. Hartford, CT: W. J. Hamersley. pp. 72–73.
  33. ^Cave, Alfred A. (1992)."Who Killed John Stone? A Note on the Origins of the Pequot War".The William and Mary Quarterly.49 (3):509–521.doi:10.2307/2947109.JSTOR 2947109.
  34. ^Vaughn, Alden T. (1962)."Pequots and Puritans: The Causes of the War of 1637".The William and Mary Quarterly.21 (2):256–269.doi:10.2307/1920388.JSTOR 1920388.
  35. ^Cave 1996, pp. 110–113.
  36. ^Cave 1996, pp. 115–117.
  37. ^Taylor 1979, p. 13.
  38. ^Atwater, Edward E. (1902).History of the colony of New Haven to its absorption into Connecticut. p. 610.
  39. ^Taylor 1979, p. 14.
  40. ^Taylor 1979, pp. 14–15.
  41. ^Grandjean, Katherine A. (2011)."The Long Wake of the Pequot War".Early American Studies.9 (2):379–411.doi:10.1353/eam.2011.0019.JSTOR 23547653.
  42. ^Grant, Daragh (2015)."The Treaty of Hartford (1638): Reconsidering Jurisdiction in Southern New England".The William and Mary Quarterly.72 (3):461–498.doi:10.5309/willmaryquar.72.3.0461.JSTOR 10.5309/willmaryquar.72.3.0461.
  43. ^Gates, Gilman C. (1935)."Saybrook at the mouth of the Connecticut; the first one hundred years". [Orange], [New Haven], [Press of the Wilson H. Lee Co.] p. 54.
  44. ^Firth, Charles."Fenwick, George" .Dictionary of National Biography. Vol. 18. p. 328.
  45. ^"Avalon Project – the Articles of Confederation of the United Colonies of New England; May 19, 1643".
  46. ^Ward, Harry M. (1961). "II. Genesis of Union".The United Colonies of New England—1643-90. New York, NY:Vantage Press. pp. 23–48.
  47. ^Ward, Harry (ed.).The United Colonies of New England-1643-90. Vantage Press=1961. pp. 400–411.
  48. ^Palfrey, John G. (1858). "Appendix".History of New England. Vol. 2. Little, Brown, and Company (New York). p. 635.
  49. ^"1675 — King Philip's War".Society of Colonial Wars in the State of Connecticut. General Society of Colonial Wars.
  50. ^O'Callaghan, Edmund B.History of New Netherland. New York Heritage Series. Vol. 2. New York, NY: Bartlett and Welford. pp. 151–155,201–202.
  51. ^Farnell, James E. (1964)."The Navigation Act of 1651, the First Dutch War, and the London Merchant Community".The Economic History Review.16 (3):439–454.doi:10.2307/2592847.JSTOR 2592847.
  52. ^Jones, Frederick Robertson (1904).The History of North America, Volume IV. Philadelphia: George Barrie & Sons. p. 134.
  53. ^abAnderson 2017, p. 10.
  54. ^"October 31: Connecticut's Greatest Legend Happened Today.... or Did It?".Today in Connecticut History. October 31, 2018.
  55. ^abDunn, Richard S. (1956)."John Winthrop, Jr., Connecticut Expansionist: The Failure of His Designs on Long Island, 1663-1675".The New England Quarterly.29 (1):3–26.doi:10.2307/363060.JSTOR 363060.
  56. ^Andrews, Charles M. (1936).The Colonial Period Of American History: The Settlements II.Yale University Press. pp. 192–194.
  57. ^Atwater, Edward Elias (1881).History of the Colony of New Haven to Its Absorption into Connecticut. author. pp. 467–468, 510.
  58. ^"The Legend of the Charter Oak".New England Historical Society. April 23, 2014.Archived from the original on April 23, 2021. RetrievedApril 23, 2021.
  59. ^"Robert Treat".Museum of Connecticut History. August 14, 2015.
  60. ^"The Legend (and Souvernirs) of the Charter Oak".New England Historical Society. April 23, 2014.
  61. ^Taylor, Alan (2001).American Colonies.Viking Press. pp. 277–280.
  62. ^"A Brief History of Yale". Yale University.
  63. ^Gallagher, Edward J. (June 2000). ""Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God": Some Unfinished Business".The New England Quarterly.73 (2): 202-221.JSTOR 366800.
  64. ^Bushman, Richard L. (1967). "XV: New Lights in Politics".From Puritan to Yankee: Character and the Social Order in Connecticut 1960-1765. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. pp. 235–266.
  65. ^"Older Than The Nation". Hartford Courant. December 29, 2013.
  66. ^"Connecticut in the American Revolution"(PDF).Society of the Cincinnati. 2002.
  67. ^Barck & Lefler 1958, pp. 258–259
  68. ^Weston Janis, Mark (2021)."Connecticut 1818: From Theocracy to Toleration Connecticut 1818: From Theocracy to Toleration".University of Connecticut School of Law.
  69. ^Purvis, Thomas L. (1999). Balkin, Richard (ed.).Colonial America to 1763. New York:Facts on File. pp. 128–129.ISBN 978-0816025275.
  70. ^Purvis, Thomas L. (1995). Balkin, Richard (ed.).Revolutionary America 1763 to 1800. New York:Facts on File. p. 147.ISBN 978-0816025282.
  71. ^"Colonial and Pre-Federal Statistics"(PDF).United States Census Bureau. p. 1168.
  72. ^Daniels (1980)
  73. ^Nutting (2000)
  74. ^Smith (2007)

Sources

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]

Specialized studies

[edit]

Historiography

[edit]
  • Daniels, Bruce C. "Antiquarians and Professionals: The Historians of Colonial Connecticut",Connecticut History (1982), 23#1, pp 81–97.
  • Meyer, Freeman W. "The Evolution of the Interpretation of Economic Life in Colonial Connecticut",Connecticut History (1985) 26#1 pp 33–43.

External links

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related toColony of Connecticut.
Archival collections
Other
  • Non-British colonial entities in the contemporary United States
Related documents
Legend
Former territory
Current territory
*CurrentCommonwealth realm
Current member of theCommonwealth of Nations
Europe
Africa
Asia
North America
South America
Oceania
Antarctica and the South Atlantic
  • 5Occupied by Argentina during theFalklands War of April–June 1982.
  • 23Since 2009 part ofSaint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha; Ascension Island (1922–) and Tristan da Cunha (1938–) were previously dependencies of Saint Helena.
  • 24Claimed in 1908; territory formed 1962; overlaps portions of Argentine and Chilean claims, borders not enforced but claim not renounced under theAntarctic Treaty.
  • 25Claimed in 1908; territory formed 1985
Portals:
International
National
People
Other

41°43′05″N72°45′05″W / 41.71803°N 72.75146°W /41.71803; -72.75146

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Connecticut_Colony&oldid=1322013529"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp