Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Comparison of the Chernobyl and Fukushima nuclear accidents

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Comparison between the Chernobyl disaster and Fukushima nuclear disaster

To date, thenuclear accidents at theChernobyl (1986) andFukushima Daiichi (2011)nuclear power plants are the onlyINES level 7 nuclear accidents.[1][2]

Chernobyl disaster
Chernobyl_-_power_plant_-_reactor_4_02
Sarcophagus over reactor No. 4 in 2013

Chernobyl and Fukushima nuclear accidents

[edit]

The following table compares the Chernobyl and Fukushima nuclear accidents.

Plant NameChernobyl
Fukushima Daiichi
LocationSoviet Union (Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic)51°23′22″N30°05′57″E / 51.38946°N 30.09914°E /51.38946; 30.09914Japan37°25′32″N141°01′18″E / 37.4255°N 141.0216°E /37.4255; 141.0216
Date of the accidentApril 26, 1986March 11, 2011
INES Level7
Plant commissioning date19771971
Years of operation before the accident9 years (plant)
  • 2 years (Unit 4)[3]
40 years (plant)
  • 40 years (Unit 1)
  • 37 years (Unit 2)
  • 35 years (Unit 3)
  • 33 years (Unit 4)
Electrical outputplant (net): 3700MWe (4 reactors)
reactors (net): 925 MWe (Units 1–4)
plant (net): 4546MWe (6 reactors)
reactors (net): 439 MWe (Unit 1), 760 MWe (Units 2–5), 1067 MWe (Unit 6)
Type of reactorRBMK-1000graphite moderated, 2nd generation reactor without containmentBWR-3 andBWR-4 reactors withMark I containment vessels
Number of reactors4 on site; 1 involved in accident6 on site; 4 (andspent fuel pools) involved in accident; one of the four reactors was empty of fuel at the time of the accident.
Amount of nuclear fuel in affected reactors1 reactor—190tonnes (t, metric tons = 210 U.S. short tons): spent fuel pools not involved in incident[4]4 reactors—854tonnes (t, metric tons): 81 t in Unit 1 reactor, 111 t in Unit 2 reactor, 111 t in Unit 3 reactor, 0 t in Unit 4 reactor (defueled), 59 t in Unit 1 spent fuel pool (SFP), 119 t in Unit 2 SFP, 104 t in Unit 3 SFP, and 269 t in Unit 4 SFP[a]
Cause of the accidentProximate cause was human error and violation of procedures. The unsafe reactor design caused instability at low power due to a positivevoid coefficient and steam formation. When an improper test was conducted at 1:00 am at low power, the reactor becameprompt critical. This was followed by asteam explosion that exposed the fuel, a raging fire, and acore meltdown. The fire lasted for days to weeks, and there is controversy over whether it was the fuel burning, nuclear decay heating or whether thegraphite moderator that made up most of the core was involved. SeeChernobyl Disaster, Note 1, for more discussion.The plants were not designed with consideration of such a largetsunami concurrently occurring with the ground sinking. Subsequent review did not lead to mitigation. A majorearthquake and tsunami caused the destruction of power lines and backup generators. Once the plants were without external power and the generators were flooded, a catastrophicdecay heat casualty ensued, leading to major reactor plant damage includingmeltdowns.
Maximum level ofradiation detected300Sv/h shortly after the explosion in vicinity of the reactor core.[8]530Sv/h inside Unit 2 containment vessel in 2017 according to Japan Times.[9]
Radioactivity releasedAccording to IAEA, total release was 14 EBq (14,000 PBq).[10] 5.2 EBq (5,200 PBq) in iodine-131 equivalent[11][12]As of 2014, a peer reviewed estimate of the total was 340–780 PBq, with 80% falling into the Pacific Ocean.[13] Radiation continues to be released into the Pacific via groundwater.
Area affected[clarification needed]An area up to 500 kilometres (310 mi) away contaminated, according to the United Nations.[14][15][16]Radiation levels exceeding annual limits seen over 60 kilometres (37 mi) to northwest and 40 kilometres (25 mi) to south-southwest, according to officials.[citation needed]
Exclusion Zone Area30 km20 km (30 km voluntary) extending north-west to 45 km in the downwind direction toIitate, Fukushima[17]
Population relocated335,000 (About 115,000 from areas surrounding the reactor in 1986; about 220,000 people fromBelarus, theRussian Federation andUkraine after 1986)154,000[18]
Population returnedNone122,000[19]
Direct fatalities from the accidentTwo immediate trauma deaths; 28 deaths fromacute radiation syndrome out of 134 showing symptoms; four from an industrial accident (helicopter crash); 15 deaths from radiation-genic thyroid cancers (as of 2005);[20] as many as 4,000 to 90,000 cancer related deaths.[21]1 confirmed cancer death attributed to radiation exposure by the government for the purpose of compensation following opinions from a panel of radiologists and other experts, medical sources pending for long-term fatalities due to the radiation.
Current statusAll reactors were shut down by 2000. The damaged reactor was covered by a hastily built steel and concrete structure called thesarcophagus. ANew Safe Confinement structure was installed in November 2016, from which the plant will be cleaned up and decommissioned.Cold shutdown declared on 16 December 2011, but decommissioning is likely to take 30 to 40 years.[22][23] All fuel rods in reactor 4 pool removed.Fukushima disaster cleanup is ongoing.

Radioactive contamination discharge

[edit]
Report datePlacePeriodIodine-131
(TBq)
Caesium-137
(TBq)
Source
fromtofromto
2002Chernobyl25 April – June 19861,600,0001,940,00059,000111,000NEA[24]
22 March 2011Fukushima12 – 15 March 2011400,0003,00030,000ZAMG[25]
2 April 201112 – 19 March 201110,000700,0011,00070,000ZAMG[26]
12 April 201111 March – 5 April[27]150,00012,000NSC[28]
12 April 201111 – 17 March 2011130,0006,100NISA[28]
7 June 2011160,00015,000NISA[29]
24 Aug. 201111 March – 5 April130,00011,000NSC[30]
15 Sept. 2011March – September100,000200,00010,00020,000Kantei[31]
Report datePlacePeriodAmount
(TBq)
Source
12 April 2011Chernobyl25 April – June 19865,200,000NISA[28]
Fukushima11 March – 5 April 2011630,000NSC[27][28]
11 – 17 March 2011370,000NISA[28]
April 20114 April 2011154NSC[27]
25 April 201124 April 201124
6–7 June 201111 – 17 March 2011770,000NISA[32][29]
7 June 2011840,000NISA,[33] press printing[32]
17 August 20113–16 August 20110.07Government[34]
23 August 201112 March - 5 April 2011630,000NISA[35]
Report datePeriodInto the sea
(TBq)
Source
directindirect
21 May 20111 – 6 April 20114,700Tepco[36]
End of August 2011March – August 20113,50016,000JMA[37]
8 September 2011March – April 201115,000Scientist Group[38]
29 October 201121 March – 15 July 201127,100IRSN[39]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^183.3 kg/assembly;[5] 400 assemblies in reactor 1, 548 assemblies in reactors 2&3, 0 assemblies in reactor 4, total of 1496 assemblies in reactors 1-4;[5][6] 292 assemblies in Unit 1 spent fuel pool (SFP), 587 assemblies in Unit 2 SFP, 514 assemblies in Unit 3 SFP, 1331 assemblies in Unit 4 SFP, total of 2724 assemblies in spent fuel pools 1-4.[7]

References

[edit]
  1. ^"The INES scale".laradioactivite.com. Retrieved7 September 2023.
  2. ^"Fukushima Daiichi Accident - World Nuclear Association".world-nuclear.org. Retrieved7 September 2023.
  3. ^"PRIS - Reactor Details".www.iaea.org. Retrieved14 July 2016.
  4. ^"Chernobyl Accident And Its Consequences - Nuclear Energy Institute".www.nei.org. Nuclear Energy Institute. Retrieved9 April 2017. - note that figures were converted into US tons
  5. ^abFukushima: Background on Reactors. February 2012. Retrieved4 September 2014. - 183.3 kg / assembly
  6. ^International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (August 2015)."The Fukushima Daiichi Accident: Technical Volume 2/5 - Safety Assessment"(PDF). International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). p. 74. Retrieved1 May 2017.
  7. ^International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (August 2015)."The Fukushima Daiichi Accident: Technical Volume 1/5 - Description and Context of the Accident"(PDF). International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). p. 66. Retrieved1 May 2017.
  8. ^B. Medvedev (June 1989)."JPRS Report: Soviet Union Economic Affairs Chernobyl Notebook" (Republished by the Foreign Broadcast Information Service ed.). Novy Mir. Archived fromthe original on 24 March 2011. Retrieved27 March 2011.
  9. ^"Fukushima radiation level highest since March 11".The Japan Times Online. 3 February 2017.
  10. ^"Chernobyl's Legacy: Health, Environmental and Socio-Economic Impacts and Recommendations to the Governments of Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine. The Chernobyl Forum: 2003–2005 Second revised version"(PDF).IAEA. 1 April 2006. Retrieved25 April 2019.
  11. ^Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima, A comparison of three nuclear reactor calamities reveals some key differences.IEEE. 1 November 2011.doi:10.1109/MSPEC.2011.6056644.
  12. ^"Chernobyl Accident 1986".World Nuclear Association. 1 June 2013. Retrieved25 April 2019.
  13. ^Steinhauser, Georg; Brandl, Alexander; Johnson, Thomas E. (2014). "Comparison of the Chernobyl and Fukushima nuclear accidents: A review of the environmental impacts".Science of the Total Environment.470–471:800–817.Bibcode:2014ScTEn.470..800S.doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.10.029.PMID 24189103.
  14. ^"ANNEX J. Exposures and effects of the Chernobyl accident"(PDF).United Nations UNSCEAR. 2000. Retrieved27 June 2019.
  15. ^"Figure XI. Surface ground deposition of caesium-137 released in Europe after the Chernobyl accident [D13]"(PDF).United Nations UNSCEAR Report. 2000.
  16. ^"Figure VI. Surface ground deposition of caesium-137 released in the Chernobyl accident [I1, L3]"(PDF).United Nations UNSCEAR Report. 2000.
  17. ^"Fukushima: Radiation Exposure". World Nuclear Association. February 2016. Retrieved4 February 2017.
  18. ^"Reconstruction Agency".www.reconstruction.go.jp. Archived fromthe original on 15 May 2016. Retrieved25 May 2016.
  19. ^"Fukushima Residents Return Despite Radiation".www.scientificamerican.com. Retrieved6 October 2019.
  20. ^"Health effects due to radiation from the Chernobyl accident (Annex D of the 2008 UNSCEAR Report)"(PDF). UNSCEAR. 2011.
  21. ^"WHO | Chernobyl: The true scale of the accident".
  22. ^Kaushik, Kavyanjali (7 April 2011)."UPDATE 1-Toshiba proposes to scrap Fukushima nuclear plant-Nikkei".Reuters. Retrieved27 July 2013.
  23. ^Justin Mccurry (10 March 2014)."Fukushima operator may have to dump contaminated water into Pacific".The Guardian. Retrieved10 March 2014.
  24. ^Archived 2012-03-18 at theWayback Machine2002, archived fromOriginal on 20 April 2011, retrieved on 6 April 2011.
  25. ^Archived 14 September 2011 at theWayback Machine(in German). ZAMG, 22 March 2011, archived fromOriginal on 20 April 2011, retrieved on 20 April 2011.
  26. ^Archived 27 February 2012 at theWayback Machine(in German). In:www.zamg.ac.at. Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik, 2 April 2011, archived fromOriginal on 20 April 2011, retrieved on 2 April 2011.
  27. ^abcArchived 30 January 2012 at theWayback Machine. JAIF / NHK, 26 April 2011, archived fromOriginal on 27 April 2011, retrieved on 27 April 2011.
  28. ^abcdeArchived 28 March 2012 at theWayback Machine. NISA/METI, 12 April 2011, archived fromOriginal on 12 April 2011, retrieved on 12 April 2011.
  29. ^abArchived 4 April 2012 at theWayback Machine. NISA/Kantei, 7 June 2011, archived fromOriginal, retrieved on 8 June 2011.
  30. ^Archived 19 April 2012 at theWayback Machine. In:Atoms in Japan. JAIF, 5 September 2011, archived fromOriginal, retrieved on 20 December 2011.
  31. ^Archived 30 January 2012 at theWayback Machine.Kantei, 15 September 2011, archived fromOriginal, retrieved on 17 December 2011. Spent fuel pool measurement on page 205, 207, 210 and 214; total release on page 449.[dead link]
  32. ^abArchived 9 April 2011 at theWayback Machine. NHK, 6 June 2011, archived fromOriginal, retrieved on 6 June 2011.
  33. ^Archived 4 April 2012 at theWayback Machine. NISA/Kantei, 7 June 2011, archived fromOriginal, retrieved on 14 June 2011.
  34. ^Archived 30 January 2012 at theWayback Machine. JAIF / NHK, 18 August 2011, archived fromOriginal, retrieved on 21 August 2011. Converted from 200 MBq/h in a two-week period.
  35. ^Earthquake Report – JAIF, No. 182. JAIF / NHK, 23 August 2011.
  36. ^Archived 26 May 2011 at theWayback Machine. Tepco, 21 May 2011, archived fromOriginal, retrieved on 23 May 2011.
  37. ^Dagmar Röhrlich:Archived 4 November 2011 at theWayback Machine(in German). In:dradio.de, Forschung Aktuell. Deutschlandfunk, 5 September 2011, archived fromOriginal, retrieved on 7 September 2011; 1 000 000 000 000 Becquerel = 1 TBq.
  38. ^Archived 19 April 2012 at theWayback Machine. JAIF / NHK, 9 September 2011, archived fromOriginal, retrieved on 11 December 2011.
  39. ^Archived 17 January 2012 at theWayback Machine. JAIF / NHK, 30 November 2011, archived fromOriginal, retrieved on 20 December 2011.

External links

[edit]
Reactors
(Active)LWR
Hokkaido
Tohoku
TEPCO
Chubu
Hokuriku
Kansai
Chugoku
Shikoku
Kyushu
JAPC
Closed
Canceled
Under construction
Other
Organizations
Regulatory bodies
Companies
Research institutions
Other
Accidents
Anti-nuclear
movement
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Comparison_of_the_Chernobyl_and_Fukushima_nuclear_accidents&oldid=1306987822"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp