The Comintern held seven World Congresses in Moscow between 1919 and 1935. During that period, it also conducted thirteen Enlarged Plenums of its governingExecutive Committee, which had much the same function as the somewhat larger and more grandiose Congresses. It initially focused on supporting revolutionary activities in Europe, Germany in particular, and resolved at itsSecond Congress in 1920 to "struggle by all available means, including armed force, for the overthrow of the internationalbourgeoisie and the creation of an internationalsoviet republic as a transition stage to the complete abolition of the state".[4] During the 1920s, the Comintern became a battleground for Soviet internal disputes, such as the struggle betweenLeon Trotsky andJoseph Stalin over the question of "socialism in one country" which ultimately saw Trotsky expelled in 1927. After this, the organization was largely under Stalin's direction.
From 1928, the Comintern adopted a "Third Period" policy of non-cooperation with social democrats against fascism, and denounced social democracy as "social fascism". On theNazi Party's rise to power in Germany in 1933, this was reversed in favor of collaboration with socialists in "popular fronts" against fascism. The outbreak ofWorld War II in 1939 saw the Comintern adopt a line of condemning both sides as imperialist, but after theGerman invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941 it began supporting theAllies, which the Soviets had joined, against theAxis. In 1943, Stalin dissolved the Comintern in order to avoid antagonizing his wartime allies, and the organization was succeeded in part by theCominform in 1947.
Differences between therevolutionary andreformist wings of theworkers' movement had been increasing for decades, but the outbreak ofWorld War I was the catalyst for their separation. TheTriple Alliance comprised two empires, while theTriple Entente was formed by three.Socialists had historically beenanti-war andinternationalist, fighting against what they perceived as militarist exploitation of theproletariat forbourgeois states. A majority of socialists voted in favor of resolutions for the Second International to call upon the international working class to resist war if it were declared.[5]
But after the beginning of World War I, many European socialist parties announced support for the war effort of their respective nations.[6] Including theBritish Labour Party who issued a manifesto stating, "the victory of the Germans would mean the death of democracy in Europe"[7] while making no such criticisms of the Russian Tsar. There were exceptions, such as the socialist parties of theBalkans[which?]. ToVladimir Lenin's surprise, even theSocial Democratic Party of Germany voted in favor of war. After influential anti-warFrench SocialistJean Jaurès was assassinated on 31 July 1914, the socialist parties hardened their support in France for theirgovernment of national unity.
Socialist parties in neutral countries mostly supported neutrality, rather than totally opposing the war. On the other hand, during the 1915Zimmerwald Conference, Lenin, then a Swiss resident refugee, organized an opposition to the "imperialist war" as theZimmerwald Left, publishing the pamphletSocialism and War where he called socialists collaborating with their national governmentssocial chauvinists, i.e. socialists in word, but nationalists in deed.[8]
The victory of theRussian Communist Party in theBolshevik Revolution of November 1917 was felt throughout the world and an alternative path to power to parliamentary politics was demonstrated. With much of Europe on the verge of economic and political collapse in the aftermath of the carnage of World War I, revolutionary sentiments were widespread. The Russian Bolsheviks headed by Lenin believed that unless socialist revolution swept Europe, they would be crushed by the military might of world capitalism just as theParis Commune had been crushed by force of arms in 1871. The Bolsheviks believed that this required a new international to foment revolution in Europe and around the world.
During this early period (1919–1924), known as the First Period in Comintern history, with the Bolshevik Revolution under attack in theRussian Civil War and awave of revolutions across Europe, the Comintern's priority was exporting the October Revolution. Some communist parties had secret military wings. One example is the M-Apparat of theCommunist Party of Germany.
The Comintern was involved in the revolutions across Europe in this period, starting with theHungarian Soviet Republic in 1919. Several hundred agitators and financial aid were sent from the Soviet Union and Lenin was in regular contact with its leaderBéla Kun. The next attempt was theMarch Action in Germany in 1921, including an attempt to dynamite the express train from Halle to Leipzig. After this failed, the Communist Party of Germany expelled its former chairmanPaul Levi from the party for publicly criticizing the March Action in a pamphlet,[10] which was ratified by theExecutive Committee of the Communist International prior to the Third Congress.[11] A new attempt was made at the time of theRuhr crisis in spring and then again in selected parts of Germany in the autumn of 1923. TheRed Army was mobilized, ready to come to the aid of the planned insurrection. Resolute action by the German government cancelled the plans, except due to miscommunication in Hamburg, where 200–300 communists attacked police stations, but were quickly defeated. In 1924, there was afailed coup in Estonia by theCommunist Party of Estonia.
The Comintern was founded at a Congress held inMoscow on 2–6 March 1919.[12] It opened with a tribute toKarl Liebknecht andRosa Luxemburg, recently executed by theFreikorps during theSpartacist Uprising,[13] against the backdrop of theRussian Civil War. There were 52 delegates present from 34 parties.[14] They decided to form anExecutive Committee with representatives of the most important sections and that other parties joining the International would have their own representatives. The Congress decided that the executive committee would elect a five-member bureau to run the daily affairs of the International. However, such a bureau was not formed and Lenin,Leon Trotsky, andChristian Rakovsky later delegated the task of managing the International toGrigory Zinoviev as the Chairman of the Executive. Zinoviev was assisted byAngelica Balabanoff, acting as the secretary of the International,Victor L. Kibaltchitch[note 1] and Vladmir Ossipovich Mazin.[16] Lenin, Trotsky, andAlexandra Kollontai presented material. The main topic of discussion was the difference betweenbourgeois democracy and thedictatorship of the proletariat.[17]
Of these, the following attended (seelist of delegates of the 1st Comintern congress): thecommunist parties of Russia, Germany, German Austria, Hungary, Poland, Finland, Ukraine, Latvia, Lithuania, Byelorussia, Estonia, Armenia, and the Volga German region; the Swedish Social Democratic Left Party (the opposition), Balkan Revolutionary People's of Russia; Zimmerwald Left Wing of France; the Czech, Bulgarian, Yugoslav, British, French, and Swiss Communist Groups; the Dutch Social-Democratic Group; Socialist Propaganda League and the Socialist Labor Party of America; Socialist Workers' Party of China; Korean Workers' Union, Turkestan, Turkish, Georgian, Azerbaijani, and Persian Sections of the Central Bureau of the Eastern Peoples, and the Zimmerwald Commission.[14][note 2]
Zinoviev served as the first Chairman of the Comintern's executive committee from 1919 to 1926, but its dominant figure until his death in January 1924 was Lenin, whose strategy for revolution had been laid out inWhat Is to Be Done? (1902). The central policy of the Comintern under Lenin's leadership was that communist parties should be established across the world to aid the internationalproletarian revolution. The parties also shared his principle ofdemocratic centralism (freedom of discussion, unity of action), namely that parties would make decisions democratically, but uphold in a disciplined fashion whatever decision was made.[20] In this period, the Comintern was promoted as thegeneral staff of theworld revolution.[21]
Second Congress of the Communist InternationalPainting byBoris Kustodiev representing the festival of the Comintern II Congress on the Uritsky Square (former Palace square) in Petrograd
Ahead of the Second Congress of the Communist International, held in July through August 1920, Lenin sent out a number of documents, including hisTwenty-one Conditions to all socialist parties. Congress adopted the 21 conditions as prerequisites for any group wanting to become affiliated with the International. The 21 Conditions called for the demarcation between communist parties and other socialist groups[note 3] and instructed the Comintern sections not to trust the legality of the bourgeois states. They also called for the build-up of party organizations along democratic centralist lines in which the party press and parliamentary factions would be under the direct control of the party leadership.
Regarding the political situation in the colonized world, the Second Congress of the Communist International stipulated that a united front should be formed between the proletariat, peasantry, and national bourgeoisie in the colonial countries. Amongst the 21 conditions drafted by Lenin ahead of the congress was the 11th thesis which stipulated that all communist parties must support the bourgeois-democratic liberation movements in the colonies. Notably, some of the delegates opposed the idea of an alliance with the bourgeoisie and preferred giving support to communist movements in these countries instead. Their criticism was shared by the Indian revolutionaryM. N. Roy, who attended as a delegate of theMexican Communist Party. The Congress removed the term bourgeois-democratic in what became the 8th condition.[22]
The Fourth World Congress was coincidentally held within days of theMarch on Rome byBenito Mussolini and hisPNF inItaly.Karl Radek lamented the proceedings in Italy as the "largest defeat suffered by socialism and communism since the beginning of the period of world revolution", and Zinoviev programmatically announced the similarities between fascism and social democracy, laying the groundwork for the latersocial fascism theory.[26]
Lenin died in 1924 and the next year saw a shift in the organization's focus from the immediate activity of world revolution towards a defense of the Soviet state. In that year, Joseph Stalin took power in Moscow and upheld the thesis ofsocialism in one country, detailed byNikolai Bukharin in his brochureCan We Build Socialism in One Country in the Absence of the Victory of the West-European Proletariat? (April 1925). The position was finalized as the state policy after Stalin's January 1926 articleOn the Issues of Leninism. Stalin made the party line clear: "An internationalist is one who is ready to defend the USSR without reservation, without wavering, unconditionally; for the USSR it is the base of the world revolutionary movement, and this revolutionary movement cannot be defended and promoted without defending the USSR".[27]
According to Russian historianVadim Rogovin, the leadership of theGerman Communist Party (KPD) had requested that Moscow sendLeon Trotsky to Germany to direct the1923 insurrection. However, this proposal was rejected by the Politburo which was controlled by Stalin, Zinoviev, and Kamenev who decided to send a commission of lower-ranking Russian Communist party members.[28]
At the Fifth World Congress of the Comintern in July 1924, Zinoviev condemned both Marxist philosopherGeorg Lukács'sHistory and Class Consciousness, published in 1923 after his involvement inBéla Kun'sHungarian Soviet Republic, andKarl Korsch'sMarxism and Philosophy. Zinoviev himself was dismissed in 1926 after falling out of favor with Stalin. Bukharin then led the Comintern for two years until 1928, when he too fell out with Stalin. Bulgarian communist leaderGeorgi Dimitrov headed the Comintern in 1934 and presided until its dissolution.
Geoff Eley summed up the change in attitude at this time as follows:
By the Fifth Comintern Congress in July 1924 [...] the collapse of Communist support in Europe tightened the pressure for conformity. A new policy of "Bolshevization" was adopted, which dragooned the CPs toward stricter bureaucratic centralism. This flattened out the earlier diversity of radicalisms, welding them into a single approved model of Communist organization. Only then did the new parties retreat from broader Left arenas into their own belligerent world, even if many local cultures of broader cooperation persisted. Respect for Bolshevik achievements and defense of the Russian Revolution now transmuted into dependency on Moscow and belief in Soviet infallibility. Depressing cycles of "internal rectification" began, disgracing and expelling successive leaderships, so that by the later 1920s many founding Communists had gone. This process of coordination, in a hard-faced drive for uniformity, was finalized at the next Congress of the Third International in 1928.[30]
The Comintern was a relatively small organization, but it devised novel ways of controlling communist parties around the world. In many places, there was a communist subculture, founded upon indigenous left-wing traditions which had never been controlled by Moscow. The Comintern attempted to establish control over party leaderships by sending agents who bolstered certain factions, by judicious use of secret funding, by expelling independent-minded activists and even by closing down entire national parties (such as theCommunist Party of Poland in 1938). Above all, the Comintern exploited Soviet prestige in sharp contrast to the weaknesses of local parties that rarely had political power.[31][32]
Communist front organizations were set up to attract non-members who agreed with the party on certain specific points.Opposition to fascism was a common theme in thepopular front era of the mid-1930s.[33] The well-known names and prestige of artists, intellectuals and other fellow travelers were used to advance party positions. They often came to the Soviet Union for propaganda tours praising the future.[34] Under the leadership of Zinoviev, the Comintern established fronts in many countries in the 1920s and after.[35] To coordinate their activities, the Comintern set up international umbrella organizations linking groups across national borders, such as theYoung Communist International (youth),Profintern (trade unions),[36]Krestintern (peasants),International Red Aid (humanitarian aid),Sportintern (organized sports), and more. Front organizations were especially influential in France, which in 1933 became the base for communist front organizerWilli Münzenberg.[37] These organizations were dissolved in the late 1930s or early 1940s.
In 1928, the Ninth Plenum of the executive committee began the so-calledThird Period, which was to last until 1935.[38] The Comintern proclaimed that the capitalist system was entering the period of final collapse and therefore all communist parties were to adopt an aggressive and militant 'left' line. In particular, the Comintern labelled Social Democracy associal fascists and urged aligned parties to work to their destruction as the 'moderate wing of fascism'. Especially with the rise of theNational Socialist Workers' Party in Germany after the1930 federal election, this stance gave rise to some opposition inside.[citation needed]
The Sixth World Congress also revised the policy of united front in the colonial (colonized) countries.China was considered to be one of such countries. However, in 1927, theKuomintang turned on theChinese Communist Party, which led to a review of the policy on forming alliances with the 'national bourgeoisie' in the 'colonizal countries'. The Congress did make a differentiation between the character of the Chinese Kuomintang on one hand and the IndianSwaraj Party and the EgyptianWafd Party on the other, considering the latter as an unreliable ally yet not a direct enemy. The Congress called on theIndian Communist Party to utilize the contradictions between the "national bourgeoisie" and theBritish Empire.[39]
The Seventh and last Congress of the Comintern was held between 25 July and 20 August 1935. It was attended by representatives of 65 communist parties. The main report was delivered by Georgi Dimitrov; other reports were delivered byPalmiro Togliatti,Wilhelm Pieck, andDmitry Manuilsky.[40] The Congress officially endorsed thepopular front againstfascism. This policy argued that communist parties should seek to form aunited front with all parties that opposed fascism, and not limit themselves to only working with like-minded leftist organizations. As Dimitrov articulated it, in order to form an anti-fascist people's front:
it is necessary [for Communists] to strive at the same time both for short-term and for long-term agreements providing forjoint action with Social-Democratic Parties, reformist trade unions and other organizations of the toilers against the class enemies of the proletariat.[41]
There was no significant opposition to this policy within any of the national sections of the Comintern. The policy would have momentous consequences, with thePopular Front led byManuel Azaña winning the 1936 election inSpain, and withLéon Blum winning the 1936 election inFrance that resulted in aPopular Front government.[42]
Stalin's purges of the 1930s affected Comintern activists living in both the Soviet Union and overseas. At Stalin's direction, the Comintern was thoroughly infused with Soviet secret police and foreign intelligence operatives and informers working under Comintern guise. One of its leaders,Mikhail Trilisser, using the pseudonym Mikhail Aleksandrovich Moskvin, was in fact chief of the foreign department of the SovietOGPU (later theNKVD). Numerous Comintern officials were also targeted by the dictator and became victims of show trials and political persecution, such asGrigory Zinoviev andNikolai Bukharin. At Stalin's orders, 133 out of 492 Comintern staff members became victims of theGreat Purge. Several hundred German communists and antifascists who had either fled fromNazi Germany or were convinced to relocate in the Soviet Union were liquidated, and more than a thousand were handed over to Germany.[43]Wolfgang Leonhard, who experienced this period in Moscow as a contemporary witness, wrote about it in his political autobiography, which was published in the 1950s: "The foreign communists living in the Soviet Union were particularly affected. In a few months, more functionaries of the Comintern apparatus were arrested than had been put together by allbourgeois governments in twenty years. Just listing the names would fill entire pages."[44]Fritz Platten died in a labor camp and the leaders of the Indian (Virendranath Chattopadhyaya or Chatto), Korean, Mexican, Iranian, and Turkish communist parties were executed. Out of 11 Mongolian Communist Party leaders, onlyKhorloogiin Choibalsan survived.Leopold Trepper recalled these days: "In house, where the party activists of all the countries were living, no-one slept until 3 o'clock in the morning. [...] Exactly 3 o'clock the car lights began to be seen [...] we stayed near the window and waited [to find out], where the car stopped".[45]
Among those persecuted were many KPD functionaries, such as members of the KPD Central Committee, who believed they had found safe asylum in the Soviet Union afterAdolf Hitler's rise to power.[citation needed] Among them wasHugo Eberlein, who had been present at the 1919 Comintern founding congress.
Trotsky, who was also marginalized and persecuted by Stalin, and other communists founded theFourth International in 1938 as an oppositional alternative to the Stalin-dominated Comintern. In the years that followed, however, their sections rarely got beyond the status of the smallest cadre or splinter parties.
Although the General Association of German Anti-Communist Associations had existed in Berlin since 1933 as part of theNazi government's propaganda against the Soviet Union and the Comintern, a treaty of assistance was concluded between Germany and Japan in 1936, theAnti-Comintern Pact. In it, the two states agreed to fight the Comintern and assured each other that they would not sign any treaties with the Soviet Union that would contradict theanti-communist spirit of the agreement. However, this did not prevent Hitler from signing theNazi-Soviet Pact with Stalin in August 1939, which in turn meant the end of the Popular Front policy and, in fact, that of the Comintern as well.
TheGerman-Soviet non-aggression treaty contained far-reaching agreements onspheres of interest, which the twototalitarian powers implemented over the next two years using military means. On 3 September 1939, France and the United Kingdom declared war on Germany after itsinvasion of Poland, beginningWorld War II in Europe. The Comintern sections now found themselves in the politically suicidal situation of having to support, for example, theSoviet invasion and subsequentannexation of Eastern Poland. TheSoviet Foreign MinisterVyacheslav Molotov declared in an October 31 speech that "as far as the European great Powers are concerned, Germany is in the position of a State which is striving for the earliest termination of war and for peace, while Britain and France [...] are in favour of continuing the war."[46] This position has been described as a way for the Soviet government to explain its refusal to honour proposals for economic assistance to Poland, which had been made before and at the start of the war, since "it was found impossible to determine with any degree of certainty who was the aggressor and who the victim."[47] The weakened and decimated Comintern was then forced to officially adopt a policy ofnon-intervention, declaring on November 6 that the conflict was an imperialist war between various national ruling classes on both sides, much likeWorld War I had been, and that the main culprits were Britain and France.[48]
This period only ended on 22 June 1941 with theinvasion of the Soviet Union, when the Comintern changed its position to one of active support for theAllies. During these two years, many communists turned their backs on their Comintern sections, and the organization lost its political credibility and relevance. On 15 May 1943, a declaration of the executive committee was sent out to all sections of the International, calling for the dissolution of the Comintern. The declaration read:
The historical role of the Communist International, organized in 1919 as a result of the political collapse of the overwhelming majority of the old pre-war workers' parties, consisted in that it preserved the teachings of Marxism from vulgarisation and distortion by opportunist elements of the labor movement.But long before the war it became increasingly clear that, to the extent that the internal as well as the international situation of individual countries became more complicated, the solution of the problems of the labor movement of each individual country through the medium of some international centre would meet with insuperable obstacles.
Concretely, the declaration asked the member sections to approve:
To dissolve the Communist International as a guiding centre of the international labor movement, releasing sections of the Communist International from the obligations ensuing from the constitution and decisions of the Congresses of the Communist International.
After endorsements of the declaration were received from the member sections, the International was dissolved.[49] The dissolution was interpreted as Stalin wishing to calm hisWorld War II allies (particularlyFranklin D. Roosevelt andWinston Churchill) and to keep them from suspecting the Soviet Union of pursuing a policy of trying to foment revolution in other countries.[50]
According to historianEric D. Weitz, 60% of German exiles in the Soviet Union had been liquidated during the Stalinist terror and a higher proportion of the KPD Politburo membership had died in the Soviet Union than in Nazi Germany. Weitz also noted that hundreds of German citizens, most of them Communists, were handed over to the Gestapo by Stalin's administration.[51]
Following the June 1947 Paris Conference onMarshall Aid, Stalin gathered a grouping of key European communist parties in September and set up theCominform, or Communist Information Bureau, often seen as a substitute to the Comintern. It was a network made up of the communist parties of Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, France, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Romania, the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia (led byJosip Broz Tito and expelled in June 1948). The Cominform was dissolved in 1956 followingStalin's 1953 death and the20th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.
While the communist parties of the world no longer had a formal international organization, they continued to maintain close relations with each other through a series of international forums. In the period directly after the Comintern's dissolution, periodical meetings of communist parties were held in Moscow. Moreover,World Marxist Review, a joint periodical of the communist parties, played an important role in coordinating the communist movement up to the break-up of theEastern Bloc in 1989–1991.
British historianJonathan Haslam reports that even after in Moscow archives:
all references to the Communist International and later the international department of the central committee, which drove the revolutionary side of foreign policy, were removed from published diplomatic documents, in order to fit in with the prevailing dogma established by Vladimir Lenin that the Soviet Government had nothing to do with Comintern. I gave up co-editing a series of documents onRusso-American relations because my Russian colleague could not or would not get over that hurdle....Even today [2020], when the Russians are more liberal in their censorship of documentary publications, one has to verify where possible through other sources independent of Moscow. And although Comintern's archives are available on the web, most of it them are still closed to the reader, even though officially declassified, and much of it is in German only. One always has to ask, what has been cut out deliberately?[55]
The OMS (Russian:Отдел международной связи,otdel mezhdunarodnoy svyazi,ОМС), also known in English as theInternational Liaison Department (1921–1939),[56][57] was the most secret department of the Comintern. It has also been translated as the Illegal Liaison Section[58][59] and Foreign Liaison Department.[60]
The OMS was the Comintern's department for the coordination of subversive and conspiratorial activities. Some of its functions overlapped with those of the main Soviet intelligence agencies, the OGPU and the GRU, whose agents sometimes were assigned to the Comintern. But the OMS maintained its own set of operations and had its own representative on the central committees of each Communist party abroad.[59]
In 2012, historian David McKnight stated:
The most intense practical application of the conspiratorial work of the Comintern was carried out by its international liaison service, the OMS. This body undertook clandenstine courier activities and work which supported underground political activities. These included the transport of money and letters, the manufacture of passports and other false documents and technical support to underground parties, such as managing "safe houses" and establishing businesses overseas as cover activities.[56]
International Workers' Association – Asociación Internacional de los TrabajadoresIWA–AIT (est. 1922) and theInternational of Anarchist Federations (IFA; est. 1968), with several spin-offs: Libertarian Communist International (est. 1954), Anarchist International Conference (est. 1958), International Libertarian Solidarity (SIL/ILS) network (est. 2001)
^Kibaltchitch would later take the nameVictor Serge. A former anarchist, he was not even a member of the RCP(b) at the time. He believed he was included because of his knowledge of European languages.[15]
^For example, the thirteenth condition stated: "The communist parties of those countries in which the communists can carry out their work legally must from time to time undertake purges (re-registration) of the membership of their party organizations in order to cleanse the party systematically of the petty-bourgeois elements within it". The term purge has taken on very negative connotations because of theGreat Purge of the 1930s, but in the early 1920s, the term was more ambiguous. See J. Arch Getty'sOrigins of the Great Purges: The Soviet Communist Party Reconsidered, 1933–1938 at p. 41 for discussion of the ambiguities in the term, including its use in the 1920 Comintern resolution.
^Legvold, Robert (2007).Russian Foreign Policy in the Twenty-First Century and the Shadow of the Past.Columbia University Press. p. 408.ISBN978-0-231-51217-6.However, the USSR created an entirely new dimension of interwar European reality, one in which Russia devised rules of the game and set the agenda, namely, the Comintern.
^Conquest, Robert (1990).The Great Terror: A Reassessment.Oxford University Press. p. 399.ISBN978-0-19-507132-0.It became instead a set of parties founded strictly on the Bolshevik model, and constitutionally subordinated to the Comintern - which always remained under effective Soviet control.
^"Third International".Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved3 December 2020.Though its stated purpose was the promotion of world revolution, the Comintern functioned chiefly as an organ of Soviet control over the international communist movement.
^M. V. S. Koteswara Rao.Communist Parties and United Front – Experience in Kerala and West Bengal.Hyderabad: Prajasakti Book House, 2003. pp. 48, 84–85.
^Saage, Richard (2007). "Sowjetmarxistische Interpretation des Faschismus".Faschismus: Konzeptionen und historische Kontexte. Eine Einführung (in German). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. pp. 24–48.ISBN978-3-531-15387-2.
^David Priestland,The Red Flag: A History of Communism (2009) p. 124.
^Rogovin, Vadim Zakharovich (2021).Was There an Alternative? Trotskyism: a Look Back Through the Years. Mehring Books. p. 272.ISBN978-1-893638-97-6.
^Geoff Eley,Forging Democracy: The History of the Left in Europe, 1850–2000 (Oxford University Press 2002). p. 228.
^David Priestland,The Red Flag: A History of Communism (2009) pp. 124–125
^Robert Service,Comrades!: a history of world communism (2007) pp. 164–173.
^Archie Brown,The Rise and Fall of Communism (2011) pp. 88–89.
^Michael David‐Fox, "The Fellow Travelers Revisited: The 'Cultured West' through Soviet Eyes",Journal of Modern History (2003) 75#2 pp. 300–335,JSTOR10.1086/380140.
^Robert Service,Comrades!: a history of world communism (2007) pp. 173–174.
^Ian Birchall, "Profintern: Die Rote Gewerkschaftsinternationale 1920–1937",Historical Materialism, 2009, Vol. 17, Issue 4, pp 164–176, review (in English) of a German language study by Reiner Tosstorff.
^Julian Jackson,The Popular Front in France (1990) p. x.
^Duncan HallasThe Comintern, chapter 6; Nicholas N. Kozlov, Eric D. Weitz "Reflections on the Origins of the 'Third Period': Bukharin, the Comintern, and the Political Economy of Weimar Germany"Journal of Contemporary History, Vol. 24, No. 3 (Jul., 1989), pp. 387–410JSTOR.
^M. V. S. Koteswara Rao.Communist Parties and United Front – Experience in Kerala and West Bengal.Hyderabad: Prajasakti Book House, 2003. pp. 47–48.
^Institute of Marxism-Leninism of the CPCz CC, Institute of Marxism-Leninism of the CPS CC.An Outline of the History of the CPCz. Prague: Orbis Press Agency, 1980. p. 160.
^Dimitrov, Georgi (1935).The United Front Against War and Fascism: Report to the Seventh World Congress of the Communist International. New York: Gamma Publishing Co. p. 16.
^abSakmyster, Thomas L. (2011).Red Conspirator: J. Peters and the American Communist Underground. University of Illinois Press. pp. 37 (translation), 38 (organization), 40 (Browder), 62 (Russian counterpart), 63 (process).
Barrett, James R. "What Went Wrong? The Communist Party, the US, and the Comintern."American Communist History 17.2 (2018): 176–184.
Belogurova, Anna. "Networks, Parties, and the" Oppressed Nations": The Comintern and Chinese Communists Overseas, 1926–1935."Cross-Currents: East Asian History and Culture Review 6.2 (2017): 558–582.online
Belogurova, Anna.The Nanyang Revolution: The Comintern and Chinese Networks in Southeast Asia, 1890–1957 (Cambridge UP, 2019). focus on Malaya
Caballero, Manuel.Latin America and the Comintern, 1919–1943 (Cambridge University Press, 2002)
Carr, E. H. Twilight of the Comintern, 1930–1935. New York: Pantheon Books, 1982.online free to borrow
Chase, William J.Enemies within the Gates? The Comintern and the Stalinist Repression, 1934–1939. (Yale UP, 2001).
Dobronravin, Nikolay. "The Comintern, 'Negro Self-Determination' and Black Revolutions in the Caribbean."Interfaces Brasil/Canadá 20 (2020): 1–18.online
Drachkovitch, M. M. ed.The Revolutionary Internationals (Stanford UP, 1966).
Drachewych, Oleksa. "The Comintern and the Communist Parties of South Africa, Canada, and Australia on Questions of Imperialism, Nationality and Race, 1919–1943" (PhD dissertation, McMaster University, 2017)online.
Dullin, Sabine, and Brigitte Studer. "Communism+ transnational: the rediscovered equation of internationalism in the Comintern years."Twentieth Century Communism 14.14 (2018): 66–95.
Gankin, Olga Hess and Harold Henry Fisher.The Bolsheviks and the World War: The Origin of the Third International. (Stanford UP, 1940)online.
Gupta, Sobhanlal Datta.Comintern and the Destiny of Communism in India: 1919–1943 (2006)online
Haithcox, John Patrick.Communism and nationalism in India: MN Roy and Comintern policy, 1920–1939 (1971).online
Hallas, Duncan.The Comintern: The History of the Third International. (London: Bookmarks, 1985).
Hopkirk, Peter.Setting the East Ablaze: Lenin's Dream of a Empire in Asia 1984 (1984).
Ikeda, Yoshiro. "Time and the Comintern: Rethinking the Cultural Impact of the Russian Revolution on Japanese Intellectuals." inCulture and Legacy of the Russian Revolution: Rhetoric and Performance–Religious Semantics–Impact on Asia (2020): 227+.
Jeifets, Víctor, and Lazar Jeifets. "The Encounter between the Cuban Left and the Russian Revolution: The Communist Party and the Comintern."Historia Crítica 64 (2017): 81–100.
Kennan, George F.Russia and the West Under Lenin and Stalin (1961) pp. 151–93.online
Lazitch, Branko and Milorad M. Drachkovitch.Biographical dictionary of the Comintern (2nd ed. 1986).
McDermott, Kevin. "Stalin and the Comintern during the 'Third Period', 1928–33."European history quarterly 25.3 (1995): 409–429.
McDermott, Kevin. "The History of the Comintern in Light of New Documents", in Tim Rees and Andrew Thorpe (eds.),International Communism and the Communist International, 1919–43. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press, 1998.
McDermott, Kevin, and J. Agnew.The Comintern: a History of International Communism from Lenin to Stalin. (Basingstoke, 1996).
Melograni, Piero.Lenin and the Myth of World Revolution: Ideology and Reasons of State 1917–1920, (Humanities Press, 1990).
Priestland, David.The Red Flag: A History of Communism. (2010).
Riddell, John. "The Comintern in 1922: The Periphery Pushes Back."Historical Materialism 22.3–4 (2014): 52–103.online
Smith, S. A. (ed.)The Oxford Handbook of the History of Communism (2014), ch 10: "The Comintern".
Studer, Brigitte.Travellers of the World Revolution: A Global History of the Communist International (Verso, 2023)online scholarly review of this book
Taber, Mike (ed.),The Communist Movement at a Crossroads: Plenums of the Communist International's Executive Committee, 1922–1923. John Riddell, trans. (Chicago: Haymarket Books, 2019).
Ulam, Adam B.Expansion and Coexistence: Soviet Foreign Policy, 1917–1973. (2nd ed. Praeger Publishers, 1974).online
Valeva, Yelena.The CPSU, the Comintern, and the Bulgarians (Routledge, 2018).
Worley, Matthew et al. (eds.)Bolshevism, Stalinism and the Comintern: Perspectives on Stalinization, 1917–53. (2008).
The Comintern and its Critics (Special issue ofRevolutionary History Volume 8, no 1, Summer 2001).
Drachewych, Oleksa. "The Communist Transnational? Transnational studies and the history of the Comintern."History Compass 17.2 (2019): e12521.
McDermott, Kevin. "Rethinking the Comintern: Soviet Historiography, 1987–1991",Labour History Review, 57#3 (1992), pp. 37–58.
McIlroy, John, and Alan Campbell. "Bolshevism, Stalinism and the Comintern: A historical controversy revisited."Labor History 60.3 (2019): 165–192.onlineArchived 2021-07-12 at theWayback Machine
Redfern, Neil. "The Comintern and Imperialism: A Balance Sheet."Journal of Labor and Society 20.1 (2017): 43–60.
Firsov, Fridrikh I., Harvey Klehr, and John Earl Haynes, eds.Secret Cables of the Comintern, 1933–1943. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 2014.online review
Gruber, Helmut.International Communism in the Era of Lenin: A Documentary History, Cornell University Press, 1967.
Kheng, Cheah Boon, ed.From PKI to the Comintern, 1924–1941, Cornell University Press, 2018.
Riddell, John (ed.):
The Communist International in Lenin's Time, Vol. 1: Lenin's Struggle for a Revolutionary International: Documents: 1907–1916: The Preparatory Years. New York: Monad Press, 1984.
The Communist International in Lenin's Time, Vol. 2: The German Revolution and the Debate on Soviet Power: Documents: 1918–1919: Preparing the Founding Congress. New York: Pathfinder Press, 1986.
The Communist International in Lenin's Time, Vol. 3: Founding the Communist International: Proceedings and Documents of the First Congress: March 1919. New York: Pathfinder Press, 1987.
The Communist International in Lenin's Time: Workers of the World and Oppressed Peoples Unite! Proceedings and Documents of the Second Congress, 1920. In Two Volumes. New York: Pathfinder Press, 1991.
The Communist International in Lenin's Time: To See the Dawn: Baku, 1920: First Congress of the Peoples of the East. New York: Pathfinder Press, 1993.
Toward the United Front: Proceedings of the Fourth Congress of the Communist International, 1922. Leiden: Brill, 2012.
![[icon]](/mt/?noimg=&dark=on&url=http%3a%2f%2fen.wikipedia.org%2fwiki%2fFile%3aWiki_letter_w_cropped.svg)
