Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Claus process

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Gas desulfurizing process
Piles of sulfur produced in Alberta by the Claus process awaiting shipment at docks in Vancouver, Canada.

TheClaus process is adesulfurizing process, recovering elementalsulfur from gaseous mixtures containinghydrogen sulfide, (H2S). First patented in 1883 by the chemistCarl Friedrich Claus, the Claus process remains the most important desulfurization process in thepetrochemicals industry. It is standard atoil refineries,natural gas processing plants, andgasification orsynthesis gas plants. In 2005, byproduct sulfur from hydrocarbon-processing facilities constituted the vast majority of the 64teragrams of sulfur produced worldwide.[1][2][3]

The overall Claus process reaction is described by the following equation:[3]

2 H2S + O2 → 2 S + 2 H2O

However, the process occurs in two steps:

2 H2S + 3 O2 → 2 SO2 + 2 H2O
4 H2S + 2 SO2 → 3 S2 + 4 H2O

Moreover, the inputfeedstock is usually a mixture of gases, containinghydrogen cyanide,hydrocarbons,sulfur dioxide orammonia. The mixture may begin as rawnatural gas, or output from physical and chemical gas treatment units (Selexol,Rectisol,Purisol andamine scrubbers) when e.g. refiningcrude oil.[4]

Gases containing over 25% H2S are suitable for the recovery of sulfur in straight-through Claus plants. Gases with less than 25% H2S can be processed through alternate configurations such as a split flow, or feed and air preheating.[5]

History

[edit]

The process was invented byCarl Friedrich Claus, a German chemist working in England. A British patent was issued to him in 1883. The process was later significantly modified byIG Farben.[6]

Process description

[edit]

A schematicprocess flow diagram of a basic 2+1-reactor (converter) SuperClaus[definition needed] unit is shown below:

Schematic flow diagram of a straight-through, 3 reactor (converter), Claus sulfur recovery unit.

The Claus technology can be divided into two process steps, thermal andcatalytic.

Thermal step

[edit]

In the thermal step, hydrogen sulfide-laden gas burns in a substoichiometriccombustion at temperatures above 850 °C.[7] The process requires careful control of the fuel-air ratio. To ensure a stoichiometric Claus reaction in the catalytic step, only13 of the hydrogen sulfide (H2S) content should convert to SO2.

A Claus facility usually maintains several separate fires in lances surrounding a centralmuffle to handle different gas sources. The concentration of H2S and other combustible components (hydrocarbons orammonia) then determine how the feed gas is burned.

Claus gases with no further combustible contents besides H2S (acid gas) burn in the lances by the following chemical reaction:

2 H2S + 3 O2 → 2 SO2 + 2 H2O       (ΔH = −518 kJ mol−1)

This is a stronglyexothermic, free-flameoxidation of hydrogen sulfide, generatingsulfur dioxide.

The central muffle itself burns gas mixtures containing ammonia (from a refinery'ssour water stripper) or hydrocarbons. Sufficient air is injected into the muffle for the complete combustion of all hydrocarbons and ammonia, and the temperature is often maintained above 1050 °C.[8][9] The high temperature destroysBTEX (Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene and Xylene) mixtures, which otherwise wouldpoison the downstream Claus catalyst.[10]

To reduce the process gas volume or obtain higher combustion temperatures, the air requirement can also be covered by injecting oxygen. Several technologies utilizing oxygen enrichment are available in industry, but require a special burner in the reaction furnace.

The Claus reaction continues downstream, as more hydrogen sulfide (H2S) reacts with theSO2, to produce gaseous, elemental sulfur:

2 H2S + SO2 → 3 S + 2 H2O      (ΔH = −1165.6 kJ mol−1)

The sulfur forms in the thermal phase as highly reactive S2 diradicals which combine exclusively to the S8allotrope:

4 S2 → S8

Usually, 60 to 70% of the total amount ofelemental sulfur produced in the process is already present at the conclusion of the thermal process step.

Side reactions

[edit]

Other chemical processes taking place in the thermal step of the Claus reaction are:[3]

2 H2S → S2 + 2 H2        (ΔH > 0)
CH4 + 2 H2O → CO2 + 4 H2
H2S + CO2 → S=C=O + H2O
CH4 + 2 S2 → S=C=S + 2 H2S

Catalytic step

[edit]

The waste stream from the thermal step is initially cooled to precipitate the sulfur, similar to the post-catalytic cooling discussed below. Further treatment with an activatedaluminum(III) ortitanium(IV) oxidecatalyst then boosts the sulfur yield. One suggested mechanism is that S6 and S8 desorb from the catalyst's active sites with simultaneous formation of stable cyclic elemental sulfur.[11]

Catalytic treatment is normally repeated a maximum of three times. Where an incineration or tail-gas treatment unit (TGTU) is added downstream of the Claus plant, only two catalytic stages are usually installed.

The catalytic recovery of sulfur consists of three substeps: heating, catalytic reaction and cooling plus condensation. Reheating the gas prevents sulfur condensation in the catalyst bed, which fouls the catalyst. Several industrial methods achieve the required bedoperating temperature:

  • Hot-gas bypass: mixing in bypass gas direct from the waste-heat boiler.
  • Indirect steam reheaters: aheat exchanger consuming high-pressure steam.
  • Gas/gas exchangers: a heat exchanger cooling the hot gas from an upstream catalytic reactor.
  • Direct-fired heaters: fired reheaters burning acid gas or fuel gas substoichiometrically to preventoxygen breakthrough

The typically recommended operating temperature of the first catalyst stage is 315 °C to 330 °C (bottom bed temperature). The high temperature hydrolyzesCOS andCS2, combustion byproducts that are otherwise inert during the modified Claus process. For subsequent stages, the catalytic conversion is maximized at lower temperatures, but care must be taken to remain above sulfur'sdew point. The operating temperatures of the subsequent catalytic stages are typically 240 °C for the second stage and 200 °C for the third stage (bottom bed temperatures).

After each catalytic pass, the process gas cools in the sulfur condenser to between 150 and 130 °C, whereupon the sulfur formedcondenses. The waste heat and thecondensation heat are captured as medium or low-pressuresteam. The condensed sulfur is removed through a liquid outlet.

Before storage, liquid sulfur streams pass a degassing unit, which removes gases (primarily H2S) dissolved in the sulfur.

The tail gas from the Claus process still contains combustible components and sulfur compounds (H2S, H2 and CO). It either burns in an incineration unit or is further desulfurized in a downstream tail gas treatment unit.

Sub dew point Claus process

[edit]

The conventional Claus process described above is limited in its conversion due to the reaction equilibrium being reached. Like all exothermic reactions, greater conversion can be achieved at lower temperatures, however as mentioned the Claus reactor must be operated above the sulfur dew point (120–150 °C) to avoid liquid sulfur physically deactivating the catalyst. To overcome this problem, the sub dew point Clauss reactors are oriented in parallel, with one operating and one spare. When one reactor has become saturated with adsorbed sulfur, the process flow is diverted to the standby reactor. The reactor is then regenerated by sending process gas that has been heated to 300–350 °C to vaporize the sulfur. This stream is sent to a condenser to recover the sulfur.

Process performance

[edit]

Over 2.6 tons of steam will be generated for each ton of sulfur yield.

Thephysical properties of elemental sulfur obtained in the Claus process can differ from that obtained by other processes.[3] In the Claus process, sulfur is usually transported as a liquid (melting point 115 °C). In elemental sulfur,viscosity increases rapidly at temperatures in excess of 160 °C due to the formation of polymeric sulfur chains.

Another anomaly is thesolubility of residual H2S in liquid sulfur as a function of temperature. Ordinarily, the solubility of a gas decreases with increasing temperature but H2S behaves inversely.[12] This means that toxic and explosive H2S gas can build up in the headspace of any cooling liquid sulfur reservoir. The explanation for this anomaly is the endothermic reaction of sulfur with H2S topolysulfanes H2Sx.

Sulfur stockpile

[edit]

Millions of tons of elemental sulfur are produced worldwide by the Claus process each year.

Owing to the high sulfur content of theAthabasca Oil Sands, stockpiles of elemental sulfur from this process now exist throughoutAlberta, Canada.[13]

Another way of storing sulfur, while reusing it as a valuable material, is as abinder for concrete, the resulting product having many desirable properties (seesulfur concrete).[14]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Sulfur production report by theUnited States Geological Survey
  2. ^Discussion of recovered byproduct sulfur
  3. ^abcdDer Claus-Prozess. Reich an Jahren und bedeutender denn je, Bernhard Schreiner, Chemie in Unserer Zeit 2008, Vol. 42, Issue 6, Pages 378–392.
  4. ^Gary, J.H.; Handwerk, G.E. (1984).Petroleum Refining Technology and Economics (2nd ed.). Marcel Dekker, Inc.ISBN 0-8247-7150-8.
  5. ^Gas Processors Association Data Book, 10th Edition, Volume II, Section 22
  6. ^Bibliographic CitationSulfur Recovery Technology, B.G. Goar,American Institute of Chemical Engineers Spring National Meeting,New Orleans,Louisiana, April 6, 1986
  7. ^Or between 950 and 1200 °C and even hotter near the flame, as stated inDer Claus-Prozess. Reich an Jahren und bedeutender denn je, Bernhard Schreiner, Chemie in Unserer Zeit 2008, Vol. 42, Issue 6, Pages 378–392.
  8. ^Klint, B. "Hydrocarbon Destruction in the Claus SRU Reaction Furnace." Proceedings of the Laurance Reid Gas Conditioning Conference. 2000.
  9. ^Rahman, Ramees K., et al. "Reduction in natural gas consumption in sulfur recovery units through kinetic simulation using a detailed reaction mechanism." Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research (2018).
  10. ^Rahman, Ramees K., Salisu Ibrahim, and Abhijeet Raj. "Oxidative destruction of monocyclic and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) contaminants in sulfur recovery units." Chemical Engineering Science 155 (2016): 348–365.
  11. ^Khanmamedox, T. K.; Welland, R. H. (2013)."How Sulphur Really Forms on The Catalyst Surface"(PDF).Sulphur.2013 (Mar–Apr). BCInsight: 62. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 15 March 2016. Retrieved4 March 2016.
  12. ^Solubility of Hydrogen Sulfide in SulfurRocco Fanelli. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry 1949 41 (9), 2031-2033 DOI: 10.1021/ie50477a047
  13. ^Hyndman, A. W.; Liu, J. K.; Denney, D. W. (1982). "Sulfur recovery from oil sands".Sulfur: New sources and uses. ACS Symposium Series. Vol. 183. pp. 69–82.doi:10.1021/bk-1982-0183.ch005.ISBN 978-0-8412-0713-4.
  14. ^Mohamed, Abdel-Mohsen Onsy; El-Gamal, Maisa M. (2010).Sulfur concrete for the construction industry: a sustainable development approach.Fort Lauderdale: J. Ross Publishing. pp. 104–105, 109.ISBN 978-1-60427-005-1.OCLC 531718953.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Claus_process&oldid=1322302363"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp