Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Same-sex unions in the United States

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromCivil unions in the United States)

Part of theLGBTQ rights series
Notes
  1. ^abPerformed in the Netherlands proper (including theCaribbean Netherlands), as well as inAruba and Curaçao. May be registered inSint Maarten in such cases, but the rights of marriage are not guaranteed.
  2. ^Neither performed nor recognized inTokelau or the associated states of theCook Islands andNiue.
  3. ^Same-sex marriage is also legal in theCrown Dependencies ofGuernsey, theIsle of Man andJersey, and theBritish Overseas Territories ofAkrotiri and Dhekelia, theBritish Antarctic Territory, theBritish Indian Ocean Territory, theFalkland Islands,Gibraltar, thePitcairn Islands,Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha, andSouth Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands. Same-sex marriage is not performed in six British Overseas Territories:Anguilla,Bermuda, theBritish Virgin Islands, theCayman Islands,Montserrat, and theTurks and Caicos Islands.
  4. ^abNeither performed nor recognized insome tribal nations of the US. Recognized but not performed in several other tribal nations andAmerican Samoa.
  5. ^Registered foreign marriages confer all marriage rights in Israel. Domestic common-law marriages confer most rights of marriage. Domestic civil marriage recognized by some cities.
  6. ^abcdTheComan v. Romania ruling of theEuropean Court of Justice obliges the state to provide residency rights for the foreign spouses ofEU citizens. Some member states, including Romania, do not follow the ruling.
  7. ^A "declaration of family relationship" is available in several of Cambodia's communes which may be useful in matters such as housing, but is not legally binding.
  8. ^Guardianship agreements confer some limited legal benefits in China, including decisions about medical and personal care.
  9. ^Hong Kong provides inheritance, guardianship rights, and residency rights for foreign spouses of legal residents.
  10. ^Indian courts have recognizedguru–shishya,nata pratha ormaitri karar–type contractual relationships, but they are not legally binding.
  11. ^Most Japanese cities and prefectures issuepartnership certificates, but they are not legally binding.
  12. ^Marriages conducted abroad between a Namibian national and a foreign spouse provide residency rights in Namibia.
  13. ^Romania provides hospital visitation rights through a "legal representative" status.
LGBTQ portal

Same-sex unions in the United States are available in various forms in all states and territories, exceptAmerican Samoa. All states have legalsame-sex marriage, while others have the options ofcivil unions,domestic partnerships, orreciprocal beneficiary relationships. The federal government only recognizes marriage and no other legal union for same-sex couples.

Hawaii was the first state to recognize limited legal same-sex unions, doing so in 1997 in the form ofreciprocal beneficiary relationships.

Federal law

[edit]

The legal issues surrounding same-sex marriage in the United States are complicated by the nation'sfederal system of government. Traditionally, the federal government does not attempt to establish its own definition of marriage. Instead, any marriage recognized by a state was recognized by the federal government, even if that marriage was not recognized by one or more other states (as was the case withinterracial marriage before 1967 due toanti-miscegenation laws). According to the federalGovernment Accountability Office (GAO), more than1,138 rights and protections are conferred to U.S. citizens upon marriage by the federal government;[1] areas affected include Social Security benefits, veterans' benefits, health insurance, Medicaid, hospital visitation, estate taxes, retirement savings, pensions, family leave, and immigration law.

The federalDefense of Marriage Act in 1996, prompted by fears of an adverse result in Hawaii's lawsuitBaehr v. Miike, defined a marriage explicitly as a union of one man and one woman for the purposes of all federal laws (See1 U.S.C. § 7), which was ultimately ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court inUnited States v. Windsor on June 26, 2013. As a result, shortly afterWindsor was decided, a number of federal areas ranging from veteran benefits to immigration were clarified as applying equally to same-sex couples.

Marriage

[edit]
See also:Same-sex marriage in the United States,Same-sex marriage law in the United States by state,Same-sex marriage status in the United States by state, andTimeline of same-sex marriage in the United States

The movement to obtaincivil marriage rights and benefits for same-sex couples in the United States began in the 1970s but remained unsuccessful for over forty years. On May 17, 2004,Massachusetts became the first U.S. state and the sixth jurisdiction in the world to legalize same-sex marriage following theSupreme Judicial Court's decision six months earlier.[2] Before nationwide legalization same-sex marriage became legal in 37 states; 25 states by court order, 10 by legislative action, and 3 by referendum. Some states had legalized same-sex marriage by more than one of the three actions.

On June 26, 2015, theSupreme Court of the United States ruled inObergefell v. Hodges that states must license and recognize same-sex marriages. Consequently, same-sex marriage is legal in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, U.S. Virgin Islands and Northern Mariana Islands. Officials inAmerican Samoa are discussing whether the ruling applies to the territory; currently same-sex marriages are neither licensed nor recognized there.

Native American Tribal Nations

[edit]
Main article:Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States

The Supreme Court decision legalizing same-sex marriage in the states and territories did not legalize same-sex marriage on Native American lands. In the United States, Congress (not the federal courts) have legal authority over Indian country. Thus, unless Congress passes a law imposing same-sex marriage on Native American tribes, federally recognized Native American tribes have the legal right to form their own marriage laws.[3] As of the time of theObergefell ruling,24 tribal nations legally recognize same-sex marriage. Some tribes have passed legislation specifically addressing same-sex relationships and some specify that state law and jurisdiction govern tribal marriages.

Civil unions

[edit]
State laws regarding same-sex unions similar to marriage in the United States1
  Domestic partnerships or civil unions granting state privileges of marriage2
  Domestic partnerships granting limited/enumerated privileges
  No same-sex unions similar to marriage
  Same-sex unions similar to marriage banned
  Same-sex and opposite-sex unions similar to marriage banned

1Not recognized by the federal government. However,same-sex marriage is legal nationwide (excluding some territories and Native American tribal jurisdictions) and is recognized by the federal government. Same-sex unions similar to marriage are provided at thelocal level in many jurisdictions.
2Domestic partnerships in Washington are only available when at least one of the partners is 62 years of age or older.
Laws regarding same-sex partnerships similar to marriage by state, county, and local level in the United States1
  Same-sex unions similar to marriage2
  Domestic partnership granting limited/enumerated privileges
  State grants benefits to state employees
  Same-sex unions not provided

1Not recognized by the federal government. However,same-sex marriage is legal nationwide (excluding American Samoa and some Native American tribal jurisdictions) and is recognized by the federal government.
2Domestic partnerships in Washington are only available when at least one of the partners is 62 years of age or older.

Civil unions are a means of establishing kinship in a manner similar to that of marriage. The formalities for entering a civil union and the benefits and responsibilities of the parties tend to be similar or identical to those relating to marriage. Various names are used for similar relationships in other countries, butcivil union was first applied inVermont.

In 2013, with theSupreme Court's invalidation of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act, same-sex marriage began to provide federal benefits. Civil unions continue not to provide federal benefits.

After same-sex marriage became legal in Vermont, Connecticut, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Delaware, those states ceased to offer civil unions.

As of 2024[update], civil unions are still offered inHawaii,[4]Illinois,[5]New Jersey,[6] andColorado;[7] as well as in severalArizona towns.[8]

Domestic partnerships

[edit]
Main articles:Domestic partnership in the United States andCities and counties in the United States offering a domestic partnership registry

Domestic partnerships are any of a variety of relationships recognized by employers or state or local government. The benefits of domestic relationships range from very limited rights to all the rights afforded to married people by the state, except where federal law makes providing benefits impossible. While most domestic partnership schemes grant those partners limited, enumerated rights, the Oregon, Washington, and Nevada schemes provide substantially the same rights as marriage and are therefore, essentially, civil unions. In 2014,Oregon began offering marriage to same-sex couples too.

Example of California domestic partnership certificate.
  Cities,boroughs,towns,townships,unincorporated areas, andvillages that offers domestic partner benefits
  Counties,consolidated city-counties,boroughs,parishes, andindependent cities that offers domestic partner benefits
  State-wide partner benefits through same-sex marriage, civil unions, domestic partnership, designated beneficiary agreements, or reciprocal beneficiary relationships, including state-wide domestic partnership benefits for state employees1

Some U.S. cities, including New York, San Francisco, and Toledo, offer domestic partnership registries. These registries afford registered partner specified rights otherwise reserved to married couples. The rights afforded include access to city services and rights created by city ordinances. Some private employers within such cities use the domestic partnership registries for the purpose of determining employee eligibility for domestic partner benefits.[9]

Six U.S. states and the District of Columbia have some form of domestic partnership. One of these, Hawaii, calls its scheme a "reciprocal beneficiary" registry. Domestic partnership benefits vary widely, ranging from enumerated lists of benefits similar to municipal domestic partnerships to benefits equal to marriage.

When state governments legalize same-sex unions in some form, municipalities and counties in these states may sometimes choose tosunset their own domestic partnership registries (asCook County, Illinois did in May 2011), while others which enacted such local registries prior to the state's own registry may retain their registries for various reasons. Such registries continue to be separate from state-level registries and unions, and usually must be filed after the dissolution of a state-level union. Those states includeCalifornia,Colorado,Hawaii,Maine,Maryland,Nevada,New Jersey, andWashington.

Employment benefits

[edit]

Some public- and private-sector U.S. employers provide health insurance or other spousal benefits to same-sex partners of employees, although the employee receiving benefits for his or her partner may have to payincome tax on the value of the benefit.

Partner benefits are more common among large employers, colleges and universities than atsmall businesses. The qualifications for and benefits of domestic partnership status vary from employer to employer; some recognize only same-sex or different-sex couples, while others recognize both.[9]

According to data from theHuman Rights Campaign Foundation, the majority ofFortune 500 companies provided benefits to same-sex partners of employees as of June 2006.[10][11] Overall, 41 percent of HR professionals indicate that their organizations offered some form of domestic partner benefits (opposite-sex partners, same-sex partners or both).[12]

Because theU.S. federal government does not recognize same- or opposite-sex partners, tax benefits provided to opposite-sex spouses are generally not available to same-sex partners and spouses or opposite-sex partners.[13] While there are certain exceptions, generally under theInternal Revenue Code Section 152, the imputed value of the benefit will be consideredtaxable income. The proposedTax Equity for Domestic Partner and Health Plan Beneficiaries Act would remove the disparity in tax treatment between such partners and married people, who are not taxed on benefits.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^"2004 updated report of the GAO"(PDF). GAO. January 23, 2004. RetrievedDecember 20, 2011.
  2. ^Belluck, Oam (May 17, 2004)."With Festive Mood, Gay Weddings Begin in Massachusetts".New York Times. RetrievedJanuary 11, 2014.
  3. ^Julian Brave NoiseCat (July 2, 2015)."Fight For Marriage Equality Not Over On Navajo Nation".Huffington Post. RetrievedJuly 2, 2015.
  4. ^"Marriage and Civil Union Licenses".health.hawaii.gov. Retrieved2024-10-09.
  5. ^"Civil Union License Info".Champaign County Clerk. Retrieved2024-10-09.
  6. ^"Vital Statistics | Civil Union Licenses".State of New Jersey Department of Health. Retrieved2024-10-09.
  7. ^"Civil Union Licenses".Park County, Colorado. Retrieved2024-10-09.
  8. ^Day, Jones (August 31, 2015)."Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships: Arizona, United States"(PDF).samesexrelationshipguide.com. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 2015-09-24.
  9. ^ab"Human Rights Campaign – Defining Domestic Partners for Benefits Purposes". Archived fromthe original on October 24, 2008. RetrievedMarch 6, 2008.
  10. ^Human Rights Campaign Foundation – State of the Workplace for Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender Americans, 2005–2006Archived 2008-09-12 at theWayback Machine. Hrc.org.
  11. ^"Human Rights Campaign – GLBT Equality at the Fortune 500". Archived fromthe original on October 24, 2008. RetrievedMarch 9, 2008.
  12. ^"Employees Undervalue Benefits, SHRM 2007 Survey Finds". RetrievedMarch 9, 2008.[permanent dead link]
  13. ^Human Rights Campaign – What the Defense of Marriage Act DoesArchived 2008-06-06 at theWayback Machine. Hrc.org.
Marriage
Divorce
Parents & children
Custody cases
Advocacy groups
Same-sex
General unions
By state
Marriage
By territory
(laws)
State
(laws)
Tribal nations
Circuit Courts
Other regions
Civil unions and
domestic partnerships
By state
By entity
Federal
Repealed or
overturned
federal laws
States
Federal district
Tribal nations
Unincorporated
territories
By type
Repealed or
overturned
Movements
Related
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Same-sex_unions_in_the_United_States&oldid=1305094981#Civil_unions"
Category:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp