Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

City of Cincinnati v. Discovery Network, Inc.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1993 United States Supreme Court case
Cincinnati v. Discovery Network, Inc.
Argued November 9, 1992
Decided March 24, 1993
Full case nameCity of Cincinnati v. Discovery Network
Citations507U.S.410 (more)
113 S. Ct. 1505; 123L. Ed. 2d 99; 1993U.S. LEXIS 2401
ArgumentOral argument
Opinion announcementOpinion announcement
Holding
A ban by the city of Cincinnati on the distribution of commercial material vianews racks violated the First Amendment.
Court membership
Chief Justice
William Rehnquist
Associate Justices
Byron White · Harry Blackmun
John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
David Souter · Clarence Thomas
Case opinions
MajorityStevens, joined by Blackmun, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter
ConcurrenceBlackmun
DissentRehnquist, joined by White, Thomas
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. I

Cincinnati v. Discovery Network, Inc., 507 U.S. 410 (1993), was a case in which theSupreme Court of the United States held that a ban by the city ofCincinnati on the distribution of commercial material via news racks violated theFirst Amendment.[1]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^City of Cincinnati v. Discovery Network, Inc., 507 U.S.410 (1993) ("Cincinnati's categorical ban on the distribution, via newsrack, of 'commercial handbills' cannot be squared with the dictates of the First Amendment.")

External links

[edit]
Unprotected speech
Clear and
present danger

andimminent
lawless action
Defamation and
false speech
Fighting words and
theheckler's veto
True threats
Obscenity
Speech integral
to criminal conduct
Strict scrutiny
Overbreadth and
Vagueness doctrines
Symbolic speech
versus conduct
Content-based
restrictions
Content-neutral
restrictions
In the
public forum
Designated
public forum
Nonpublic
forum
Compelled speech
Compelled subsidy
of others' speech
Government grants
and subsidies
Government speech
Loyalty oaths
School speech
Public employees
Hatch Act and
similar laws
Licensing and
restriction of speech
Commercial speech
Campaign finance
and political speech
Anonymous speech
State action
Official retaliation
Boycotts
Prisons
Stub icon

This article related to a case of theSupreme Court of the United States of theRehnquist Court is astub. You can help Wikipedia byexpanding it.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=City_of_Cincinnati_v._Discovery_Network,_Inc.&oldid=1311185776"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp