Non-narrative film is an aesthetic ofcinematic film that does not narrate, or relate "an event, whether real or imaginary". It is usually a form ofart film orexperimental film, not made for mass entertainment.
Narrative film is the dominant aesthetic, though non-narrative film is not fully distinct from that aesthetic. While the non-narrative film avoids "certain traits" of the narrative film, it "still retains a number of narrative characteristics". Narrative film also occasionally uses "visual materials that are not representational".[1] Although manyabstract films are clearly devoid of narrative elements, distinction between a narrative film and a non-narrative film can be rather vague and is often open for interpretation. Unconventional imagery, concepts and structuring can obscure thenarrativity of a film.
Terms such asabsolute film,cinéma pur,true cinema andintegral cinema[2] have been used for non-narrative films that aimed to create a purer experience of the distinctive qualities of film, like movement, rhythm, and changing visual compositions. More narrowly, "absolute film" was used for the works of a group of filmmakers in Germany in the 1920s, that consisted, at least initially, of animated films that were totally abstract. The French termcinéma pur was coined to describe the style of several filmmakers in France in the 1920s, whose work was non-narrative, but hardly ever non-figurative.
Much ofsurrealist cinema can be regarded as non-narrative films and partly overlaps with thedadaist cinéma pur movement.
Abstract film orabsolute film[3] is a subgenre ofexperimental film and a form ofabstract art. Abstract films are non-narrative, contain no acting, and do not attempt to reference reality or concrete subjects. They rely on the unique qualities of motion, rhythm, light, and composition inherent in the technical medium of cinema to create emotional experiences.[4]
Many abstract films have been made withanimation techniques. The distinction between animation and other techniques can be rather unclear in some films. For instance, moving objects could either be animated withstop motion techniques, recorded during their actual movement, or appear to move when being filmed against a neutral background with a moving camera.
A number of devices can be regarded as early media for abstract animation or visual music, includingcolor organs,chinese fireworks, thekaleidoscope,musical fountains, andspecial animated slides for the magic lantern (like the chromatrope).
Some of the earliest animation designs for stroboscopic devices (like the phénakisticope and the zoetrope) were abstract, including oneFantascope disc by inventorJoseph Plateau and many ofSimon Stampfer'sStroboscopische Scheiben (1833).
Abstract film concepts were shaped by early 20th century art movements such asCubism,Expressionism,Dadaism,Suprematism,Futurism,Precisionism, and possible others.[5] These art movements were beginning to gain momentum in the 1910s.
Italian FuturistsArnaldo Ginna and his brotherBruno Corra made hand-painted films between 1910 and 1912 that are now lost.[2][6] In 1916 they publishedThe Futurist Cinema manifesto together withGiacomo Balla,Filippo Tommaso Marinetti, Remo Chiti, and Emilio Settimelli. They proposed a cinema that "being essentially visual, must above all fulfill the evolution of painting, detach itself from reality, from photography, from the graceful and solemn. It must become antigraceful, deforming, impressionistic, synthetic, dynamic, free-wording." "The most varied elements will enter into the Futurist film as expressive means: from the slice of life to the streak of color, from the conventional line to words-in-freedom, from chromatic and plastic music to the music of objects. In other words it will be painting, architecture, sculpture, words-in-freedom, music of colors, lines, and forms, a jumble of objects and reality thrown together at random." Among the proposed methods were: "Cinematic musical researches", "Daily exercises in freeing ourselves from mere photographed logic" and "Linear, plastic, chromatic equivalences, etc., of men, women, events, thoughts, music, feelings, weights, smells, noises (with white lines on black we shall show the inner, physical rhythm of a husband who discovers his wife in adultery and chases the lover – rhythm of soul and rhythm of legs)."[7] About a month later the short filmVita Futurista was released, directed by Ginna[8] in collaboration with Corra, Balla, and Marinetti. Only a few frames of the film remain and little else of any Futurist Cinema work seems to have been made or preserved.
Around 1911 Hans Lorenz Stoltenberg also experimented with direct animation, rhythmically piecing together tinted film in different colors. He published a leaflet about it and claimed that many people growing up with the hand-colored films ofGeorges Méliès andFerdinand Zecca would try their hand on painting on film at that time.[9][10]
In 1913Léopold Survage created hisRythmes colorés: over 100 abstract ink wash / watercolor drawings that he wanted to turn into a film. Unable to raise the funds, the film was not realized and Survage only exhibited the pictures separately.[11]
Mary Hallock-Greenewalt used templates and aerosol sprays to create repeating geometrical patterns on hand-painted films. These extant films were probably made around 1916 for herSarabet color organ, for which she filed 11 patents between 1919 and 1926. The films were not projected, but one viewer at a time could look down into the machine at the film itself. The Sarabet was first publicly demonstrated at John Wanamaker's New York department store in 1922.[12]
Some of the earliest abstract motion pictures known to survive are those produced by a group of artists working in Germany in the early 1920s:Walter Ruttmann,Hans Richter,Viking Eggeling, andOskar Fischinger.
Absolute film pioneers sought to create short length and breathtaking films with different approaches to abstraction-in-motion: as an analogue to music, or as the creation of an absolute language of form, a desire common to early abstract art. Ruttmann wrote of his film work as "painting in time".[13] Absolute filmmakers used rudimentary handicraft, techniques, and language in their short motion pictures that refuted the reproduction of the natural world, instead, focusing on light and form in the dimension of time, impossible to represent in static visual arts.
Viking Eggeling came from a family of musicians and analysed the elements of painting by reducing it into his "Generalbass der Malerei", a catalogue of typological elements, from which he would create new "orchestrations". In 1918 Viking Eggeling had been engaging inDada activities in Zürich and befriended Hans Richter. According to Richter, absolute film originated in the scroll sketches that Viking Eggeling made in 1917–1918.[14] On paper rolls up to 15 meters long, Eggeling would draw sketches of variations of small graphic designs, in such a way that a viewer could follow the changes in the designs when looking at the scroll from beginning to end. For a few years Eggeling and Richter worked together, each on their own projects based on these ides, and created thousands of rhythmic series of simple shapes. In 1920 they started working on film versions of their work.[15]
Walter Ruttmann, trained as a musician and painter, gave up painting to devote himself to film. He made his earliest films by painting frames on glass in combination with cutouts and elaborate tinting and hand-coloring. HisLichtspiel: Opus I was first screened in March 1921 in Frankfurt.[2][16]
Hans Richter finished his first filmRhythmus 21 (a.k.a.Film ist Rhythmus) in 1921, but kept changing elements until he first presented the work on 7 July 1923 in Paris at the dadaistSoirée du coeur à barbe program inThéâtre Michel. It was an abstract animation of rectangular shapes, partly inspired by his connections withDe Stijl. FounderTheo van Doesburg had visited Richter and Eggeling in December 1920 and reported on their film works in his magazineDe Stijl in May and July 1921.Rhytmus 23 and the colourfulRhythmus 25 followed similar principles, with noticeablesuprematist influence ofKasimir Malevich's work.Rhythmus 25 is considered lost.
Eggeling debuted hisHorizontal-vertikalorchester in 1923. The film is now considered lost. In November 1924 Eggeling was able to present his new finished filmSymphonie diagonale in a private screening.
On 3 May 1925 the Sunday matinee programDer absolute Film took place in the UFA-Palast theater at the Kurfurstendamm in Berlin. Its 900 seats soon sold out and the program was repeated a week later. Eggeling'sSymphonie diagonale, Richter'sRhythmus 21 andRhythmus 23, Walter Ruttmann'sOpus II,Opus III andOpus IV were all shown publicly for the first time in Germany, along with the two French dadaist cinéma pur filmsBallet Mécanique and René Clair'sEntr'acte, andLudwig Hirschfeld-Mack's performance with a type of color organ.[17][16] Eggeling happened to die a few days later.
Oskar Fischinger met Walter Ruttmann at rehearsals for screenings ofOpus I with live music in Frankfurt. In 1921 he started experimenting with abstract animation in wax and clay and with colored liquids. He used such early material in 1926 in multiple-projection performances forAlexander Laszlo's Colorlightmusic concerts.[2] That same year he released his first abstract animations and would continue with a few dozens of short films over the years.
TheNazis censorship against so-called "degenerate art" prevented the German abstract animation movement from developing after 1933.[18] The last abstract motion picture screened in the Third Reich wasHans Fischinger'sTanz der Farben (i.e.Dance of the Colors) in 1939. The film was reviewed by theFilm Review Office and byGeorg Anschütz for theFilm-Kurier. The director Herbert Seggelke was working on the abstract motion pictureStrich-Punkt-Ballett (i.e. Ballet of Dots and Dashes) in 1943, but could not finish the film during the war.[19]
Mieczysław Szczuka also attempted to create abstract films, but seems never to have realized his plans. Some designs were published in 1924 in the avant-garde magazine block as5 Moments of an Abstract Film.[20]
In 1926 dadaistMarcel Duchamp releasedAnémic Cinéma, filmed in collaboration withMan Ray andMarc Allégret. It showed early versions of his rotoreliefs, discs that seemed to show an abstract 3-D moving image when rotating on a phonograph.
In 1927Kasimir Malevich had created a 3-page scenario in manuscript with explanatory color drawings for an "Artistic-Scientific film" entitledArt and the Problems of Architecture: The Emergence of a New Plastic System of Architecture, an instructional film about the theory, origin, and evolution ofsuprematism. Initially there were plans to have the film animated in a Soviet studio, but Malevich took it along on a trip to Berlin and ended up leaving it for Hans Richter after the two had met. The style and colorfulness ofRhythmus 25 had convinced Malevich that Richter should direct the film. Due to circumstances the scenario did not get into the hands of Richter before the end of the 1950s. Richter created storyboards, two rough cuts and at least 120 takes for the film in collaboration with Arnold Eagle since 1971, but it remained incomplete. Richter had wanted to create the film totally in Malevich's spirit, but concluded that in the end he could not discern how much of his own creativity withheld him from executing the scenario properly.[21]
Mary Ellen Bute started making experimental films in 1933, mostly with abstract images visualizing music. Occasionally she applied animation techniques in her films.
Len Lye made the first publicly releaseddirect animation entitledA Colour Box in 1935. The colorful production was commissioned to promote theGeneral Post Office.
Oskar Fischinger moved to Hollywood in 1936 when he had a lucrative agreement to work forParamount Pictures. A first film, eventually entitledAllegretto, was planned for inclusion in the musical comedyThe Big Broadcast of 1937. Paramount had failed to communicate that it would be in black and white, so Fischinger left when the studio refused to even consider a color test of the animated section. He then createdAn Optical Poem (1937) forMGM, but received no profits because of the way the studio's bookkeeping system worked.
Walt Disney had seen Lye'sA Colour Box and became interested in producing abstract animation. A first result was theToccata and Fugue in D Minor section in the "concert film"Fantasia (1940). He hired Oskar Fischinger to collaborate with effects animatorCy Young, but rejected and altered much of their designs, causing Fischinger to leave without credit before the piece was completed.
Fischinger's two commissions fromThe Museum of Non-Objective Painting did not really allow him the creative freedom that he desired. Frustrated with all the trouble with filmmaking he experienced in America, Fischinger did not make many films afterwards. Apart from some commercials, the only exception wasMotion Painting No. 1 (1947), which won the Grand Prix at the Brussels International Experimental Film Competition in 1949.
Norman McLaren, having carefully studied Lye'sA Colour Box,[22] founded theNational Film Board of Canada's animation unit in 1941. Direct animation was seen as a way to deviate from cel animation and thus a way to stand out from the many American productions. McLaren's direct animations for NFB includeBoogie-Doodle (1941),[23]Hen Hop (1942),[24]Begone Dull Care (1949) andBlinkity Blank (1955).
Harry Everett Smith created several direct films, initially by hand-painting abstract animations on celluloid. HisEarly Abstractions was compiled around 1964 and contains early works that may have been created since 1939, 1941 or 1946 until 1952, 1956 or 1957. Smith was not very concerned about keeping documentation about his oeuvre and frequently re-edited his works.[25]
UP-graduated Filipino painter Rodolfo Paras-Perez created his only short film,Conversation in Space, a 2-minute film with vivid and captivating abstract animation that used withcollage andpaint.[26]
Cinéma pur (French:[sinemapyʁ];lit. 'pure cinema') was anavant-garde film movement of French filmmakers, who "wanted to return the medium to its elemental origins" of "vision and movement".[27] It declares cinema to be its own independentart form that should not borrow from literature or stage. As such, "pure cinema" is made up of nonstory, noncharacter films that convey abstract emotional experiences through unique cinematic devices such as camera movement and camera angles, close-ups, dolly shots, lens distortions, sound-visual relationships, split-screen imagery, super-impositions,time-lapse photography,slow motion,trick shots, stop-action, montage (theKuleshov effect, flexible montage of time and space), rhythm through exact repetition or dynamic cutting, and visual composition.[16][27]
Cinéma pur started around the same period with the same goals as the absolute film movement and both mainly concerned dadaists. Although the terms have been used interchangeably, or to differentiate between the German and the French filmmakers, a very noticeable difference is that very few of the French cinéma pur films were totally non-figurative or contained traditional (drawn) animation, instead mainly using radical types of cinematography,special effects, editing,visual effects, and occasionally somestop motion.
The term was coined by filmmakerHenri Chomette, brother of filmmakerRené Clair.[16]
The cinéma pur film movement includedDada artists, such asMan Ray, René Clair andMarcel Duchamp. The Dadaists saw in cinema an opportunity to transcend "story", to ridicule "character," "setting," and "plot" as bourgeois conventions, to slaughter causality by using the innate dynamism of the motion picture film medium to overturn conventional Aristotelian notions of time and space.
Man Ray'sLe Retour à la Raison (2 mins) premiered in July 1923 at the 'Soirée du coeur à barbe" program in Paris. The film consisted mainly of abstract textures, with moving photograms that were created directly on the film strip, abstract forms filmed in motion, and light and shadow on the nude torso of Kiki of Montparnasse (Alice Prin). Man Ray later madeEmak-Bakia (16 mins, 1926);L'Étoile de Mer (15 mins, 1928); andLes Mystères du Château de Dé (27 mins, 1929).
Dudley Murphy had seen Man Ray'sLe Retour à la Raison and proposed to collaborate on a longer film. They shot all kinds of material in the street and in a studio, used Murphy's special beveled lenses, and crudely animated showroom dummy legs. They chose the titleBallet Mécanique from an image by Francis Picabia that had been published in his New York391 magazine, which had also featured a poem and art by Man Ray. They ran out of money before they could complete the film. Fernand Léger helped financing the completion and contributed a cubist Charlie Chaplin image that was jerkily animated for the film. It is unclear if Léger contributed anything else, but he got to distribute the film in Europe and took sole credit for the film. Ray had backed out of the project before completion and did not want his name to be used. Murphy had gone back to the U.S.A. shortly after editing the final version, with the deal that he could distribute the film there.[2]
Avant-garde artistFrancis Picabia and composerErik Satie askedRené Clair to make a short film to be shown as theentr'acte of their Dadaist balletRelâche forBallets suédois. The result became known asEntr'acte (1924) and featuredcameo appearances by Francis Picabia, Erik Satie,Man Ray, Marcel Duchamp, composerGeorges Auric, Jean Borlin (director of theBallets Suédois) and Clair himself. The film showed absurd scenes and used slow motion and reverse playback, superimpositions, radical camera angles, stop motion and other effects. Erik Satie composed a score that was to be performed in sync with certain scenes.
Henri Chomette adjusted the film speed and shot from different angles to capture abstract patterns in his 1925 filmJeux des reflets de la vitesse (The Play of Reflections and Speed). His 1926 filmCinq minutes du cinéma pur (Five minutes of Pure Cinema) reflected a more minimal, formal style.[28]
The movement also encompasses the work of the feminist critic/cinematic filmmakerGermaine Dulac, particularlyThème et variations (1928),Disque 957 (1928), andCinegraphic Study of an Arabesque. In these, as well as in her theoretical writing, Dulac's goal was "pure" cinema, free from any influence from literature, the stage, or even the other visual arts.[27][29]
The style of the French cinéma pur artists probably had a strong influence on newer works by Ruttmann and Richter, which would no longer be totally abstract.[16] Richter'sVormittagsspuk (Ghosts before Breakfast) (1928) features some stop motion, but mostly shows live action material with cinematographic effects and visual tricks. It is usually regarded as a dadaist film.
![]() | This sectionneeds expansion. You can help byadding to it.(January 2024) |
According to essayist and filmmaker Hubert Revol, the clearest examples of pure cinema are documentaries.[28]
Documentary must be made by poets. Few of those within French cinema have understood that in our country, we possess innumerable elements and subjects to make, not just insignificant ribbons (of film), but splendid films lively and expressive... The purest demonstration of pure cinema, that is to say of poetry which is truly cinematographic, has been provided us by some remarkable films, vulgarly called documentaries, particularlyNanook andMoana.[30]
— Herbert Revol, filmmaker and essayist
According to Timothy Corrigan inThe Film Experience, non-narrative film is distinct from nonfiction film, though both forms may overlap indocumentary films. In the book Corrigan writes, "A non-narrative film may be entirely or partly fictional; conversely, a nonfiction film can be constructed as a narrative."[31]
Ruttmann's 1927Berlin: Symphony of a Great City,Dziga Vertov'sMan with a Movie Camera (1929) and othercinéma vérité works can be considered as documentaries in the cinéma pur style.
Documentary filmmaker, artist, and choreographerHilary Harris (1929 – 1999) invested 15 years in crafting his time-lapse film portraying Manhattan as a dynamic organism, offering a captivating glimpse of New York during its gritty peak. The short-fim maintains a continuous sense of movement, creating an illusion of organic evolution and transformation via time-lapse photography. In this portrayal, the city evolves into a dynamic entity pulsing with energy, vitality, and perpetual regeneration. It embodies a colossal organism, thriving on the life force of those drawn to it, each seeking to conquer its urban landscape. Titled "Organism," it was finalised in 1975 and is recognised as a precursor toGodfrey Reggio'sKoyaanisqatsi (1982). Very little had been said about the importance of this short film. Nevertheless, it was the spark from which a visual revolution occurred in documentary filmmaking.[32]
The non-linear and not-narrative documentary current found its world recognition with Godfrey Reggio. He is a filmmaker known for his exploration of various themes related to human life and society. Amongst his works stand out theQatsi trilogy, which includesKoyaanisqatsi (1982),Powaqqatsi (1988), andNaqoyqatsi (2002). These films, scored by composerPhilip Glass, offer visual experiences that examine the effects of technology, consumerism, and environmental issues on the world. Reggio's work employs techniques such as time-lapse photography and slow motion to prompt reflection on contemporary existence. Following in Reggio's footsteps, his cinematographer Ron Fricke achieved notable milestones within this approach, includingChronos,Baraka, andSamsara.[33][34]
DirectorGeorge Lucas, growing up as a teenager in theSan FranciscoBay Area during the early 1960s, saw many exhilarating and inspiring abstract 16mm movies and nonstory noncharacter 16mm visual tone poems screened at cinematic artistBruce Baillie's independent, undergroundCanyon Cinema shows; along with some ofBaillie's own early visual motion pictures, Lucas became inspired by the work ofJordan Belson,Bruce Conner,Will Hindle, and others. Lucas then went on to enrol as a film student atUSC School of Cinematic Arts, where he saw many more inspiring cinematic works in class, particularly the visual movies coming out of theNational Film Board of Canada likeArthur Lipsett's21-87, the CanadiancameramanJean-Claude Labrecque's cinéma vérité60 Cycles, the work ofNorman McLaren, and the visualise cinéma vérité documentaries ofClaude Jutra. Lipsett's21-87, a 1963 Canadian shortabstractcollage film of discarded footage and city street scenes, had a profound influence on Lucas and sound designer/editorWalter Murch.[35] Lucas greatly admiredpure cinema and at film school became prolific at making 16mm nonstory noncharacter visual tone poems and cinéma vérité, with such titles asLook at Life,Herbie,1:42.08,The Emperor,Anyone Lived in a Pretty (how) Town,Filmmaker, and6-18-67. Lucas's tributes to21-87 appear in several places inStar Wars, with the phrase, "the Force", said to have been inspired by21-87 in part. Lucas throughout his entire career was passionate and interested in camerawork and editing, defining himself as a filmmaker as opposed to a director, and he loved making abstract visual movies that create emotions purely through cinema.[36][37]
Music was an extremely influential aspect of absolute film, and one of the biggest elements, other than art, used by abstract film directors. Absolute film directors are known to use musical elements such as rhythm/tempo, dynamics, and fluidity.[38] These directors sought to use this to add a sense of motion and harmony to the images in their films that was new to cinema, and was intended to leave audiences in awe.[39] In her article "Visual Music" Maura McDonnell compared these films to musical compositions due to their careful articulation of timing and dynamics.[40]
The history of abstract film often overlaps with the concerns and history ofvisual music. Some films are very similar to electronicmusic visualization, especially when electronic devices (for instanceoscilloscopes) were used to generate a type ofmotion graphics in relation to music, except that the images in these films are not generated in real-time.