 Cinco Chagas is similar to this large Portuguese ship that was captured by the English and the Dutch in 1602. | |
| History | |
|---|---|
.svg) Portugal | |
| Name | Cinco Chagas |
| Builder | Constantino de Braganza |
| Fate | Sunk, 22–23 June 1594 |
| General characteristics | |
| Class and type | Carrack |
| Tons burthen | 2,000 tons |
| Complement | 1400 passengers |
Cinco Chagas (English:Five Wounds) was aPortuguesenau (carrack) that was sunk during theaction of Faial on 22–23 June 1594 during theAnglo-Spanish War. When it was sunk, the carrack was reportedly having aburden tonnage of 2,000 tons.[1][2]
Cinco Chagas was built in Goa like her famous namesake thirty-two years previously. On her maiden voyage[3] in 1593 Francisco de Mello was the captain. Reports suggest that she was overloaded with goods when departing from Goa in 1593.Cinco Chagas wintered inMozambique, where it was determined that the ship was in very poor condition. The crew of around 1400 people (including 270 slaves).[4] She was sunk during theaction of Faial on 22–23 June 1594 in theAnglo-Spanish War.[1][2] Before it sank the ship had been set on fire, and over five hundred people were killed.[5] The English spared thirteen of the crew.[3]
The cargo ofCinco Chagas (along with the salvaged cargo from the two other ships) was worth well in excess of 2,000,000 ducats, and in addition there were twenty-two treasure chests of diamonds, rubies, and pearls estimated to be worth US$15–20 billion by 2017 values.[6] The prisoners that were saved told their captors that yielding had been impossible as the riches were for theking of Spain and Portugal and that the captain, being highly in the king's favor, would upon his return have been made viceroy in the Indies.[7]: 56 Estimates of theCinco Chagas's location suggest that it lies in seas over one mile deep in the Atlantic Ocean eighteen miles south of the channel betweenPico Island and Faial along with its precious cargo of diamonds and gems.[8] The wreck has been searched for by treasure hunters but no signs have been found partly due to the depth.[9]