 | This article includes alist of references,related reading, orexternal links,but its sources remain unclear because it lacksinline citations. Please helpimprove this article byintroducing more precise citations.(February 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
 | This articlerelies largely or entirely on asingle source. Relevant discussion may be found on thetalk page. Please helpimprove this article byintroducing citations to additional sources. Find sources: "Chancellor of Poland" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(June 2024) |
| Grand Chancellor of the Crown | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Residence | Kraków Warsaw |
| Appointer | Monarch of Poland Polish Parliament (Sejm) |
| Formation | 12th century |
| First holder | Jan? Goswin |
| Final holder | Antoni Sułkowski |
| Abolished | 1795 |
TheChancellor of Poland (Polish:Kanclerz -Polish pronunciation:[ˈkant͡slɛʂ], fromLatin:cancellarius), officially, theGrand Chancellor of the Crown between 1385 and 1795, was one of the highestofficials in the historicCrown of the Kingdom of Poland. This office functioned from the earlyPolish kingdom of the 12th century until the end of thePolish–Lithuanian Commonwealth in 1795. A respective office also existed in theGrand Duchy of Lithuania since the 16th century. Today the office of the chancellor has been replaced by that of thePrime Minister.
The Chancellors' powers rose together with the increasing importance of written documents. In the 14th century the office of Chancellor ofKraków (Polish:Kanclerz krakowski) evolved into the Chancellor of the Crown (Polish:Kanclerz koronny) and from that period the chancellor powers were greatly increased, as they became responsible for theforeign policy of the entire Kingdom (later, the Commonwealth). The Chancellor was also supposed to ensure the legality of monarch's actions, especially whether or not they could be considered illegal in the context ofpacta conventa (an early set of documents containing important laws, in some aspects resembling today'sconstitutions). Finally, the Chancellor was also responsible for his office, thechancellery (Polish:kancelaria). A 16th-century Polish lawyer, Jakub Przybylski, described the Chancellor as the king's hand, eye and ear, translator of his thoughts and will.
From 15th century onward there were two separate Chancellor offices, neither of them subordinate to the other: Grand Chancellor (Polish:Kanclerz wielki) and Vice-Chancellor (Polish:Podkanclerzy). In the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, there were four Chancellors: Grand Chancellor of the Crown (Polish:Kanclerz wielki koronny), Grand Chancellor of Lithuania (Polish:Kanclerz wielki litewski), Vice-Chancellor of the Crown (Polish:Podkanclerzy koronny), and Vice-Chancellor of Lithuania (Polish:Podkanclerzy litewski).
During thetimes of fragmentation of Poland, each Polish prince had his own chancellor, but with thereunification of Poland, the office of Chancellor of Kraków (contemporary capital of the Kingdom of Poland) became dominant and other, local chancellors disappeared by the early 15th century. Also in the 15th century, the Chancellor's office was split into that of the Grand Chancellor and Vice-Chancellor. The Vice-Chancellor was, however, not a subordinate of the Chancellor and his independence was specifically confirmed by the laws passed during the reign of kingAlexander Jagiellon. TheSejm of 1504 confirmed the Chancellor's office as well as its powers and responsibilities for the first time, specifically stating that one person cannot hold both Chancellors' offices, and established the Grand Lithuanian Chancellor's office. The Lithuanian Vice-Chancellor was created later, in the mid-16th century
After theUnion of Lublin in 1569 there were four Chancellors (one Grand Chancellor and one Vice-Chancellor for Crown, and another pair for Lithuania).
At first, the Chancellor's office was always given to anecclesiastic person. From 1507,Sigismund I the Old decided that the title of Grand Chancellor of the Crown would be rotated between secular and ecclesiastic nobles, and at least one Chancellor (both in the Grand and Deputy pair and in the Crown and Lithuanian one after the Union of Lublin) was required to be a secular person.
Chancellors, as most of the other offices in Poland and later, the Commonwealth, were nominated to the office for life by the King during theSejm (Parliament) session. From the 15th and 16th centuries, after the reforms of Alexander, Sigismund I and the Union of Lublin, the power and importance of the Chancellor's office was stabilised, as asenatorial office lesser than that of thehetmans (military commanders who had, however, no right to vote in the Senate) and theGrand Marshals, but more important than that of theGrand Treasurers,Court Marshal and others.
By custom, the Grand Chancellor of the Crown directed the Commonwealth foreign policies towards the west – Western Europe and south –Ottoman Empire, while the Grand Chancellor of Lithuania the policies towards the east –Muscovy (later, theRussian Empire).
The Chancellor and Vice-Chancellor were responsible for the work of theirchancelleries, Grand and Deputy respectively. They were supposed to be in constant contact and develop common policies, since their powers were equal. They were specifically forbidden from issuing illegal and contradictory documents, and could judge any documents contrary to the existing law 'irrelevant and without power'. In theory, the power of the Chancellors were equal. In practice, much depended on their personalities and political influence. Conflicts between Chancellors, while rare, when it occurred, could paralyse the entire country. This was the case during the conflict betweenKrzesław z Kurozwęk andMaciej Drzewicki between 1501 and 1503.
Among their other responsibilities were the matters offoreign policy (correspondence with other countries) and to a smaller extent, internal affairs, as they had alsojudiciary powers, presiding over the 'assessors' courts' (Polish:Asesoria), that were the highestappeal courts for people subjected tocrown laws (i.e. not subjected to ecclesiastic ormagnates courts, but when a chancellor was an ecclesiastic person, he could judge the priests of the king's court). They could judge in various cases, with the exception of when the sides had already reached a compromise or in cases of territorial disputes.
The Chancellors' offices were the chancelleries (Crown and Lithuanian respectively). Chancelleries were staffed with officials known as thechancellists (Polish:kancelista): theregent (regent kancelarii),secretaries (sekretarz in Crown)1, writers (pisarz in Lithuania, equivalent to the secretary in Crown),archivists (Polish: archiwista),metricants (Polish: metrykant) and otherclerks. The Regent divided the work between the clerks. 2 secretaries (one responsible for privatecorrespondence, the second for official) presented prepared letters to the king for his signature. Writers designed the letters; clerks readied the finaldrafts. No copies were made, but were instead entered in the archives – books called Metrics (Polish:Metryki), who were taken care of by the two metricans (2 in Poland and 2 in Lithuania respectively). The Metrican of the Grand Chancellor was called the Grand Metrican, one serving the Vice-Chancellor was a Minor Metrican. The Chancellery staff had no wages, just like the Chancellors, but in the middle of each reception room was the box into which all clients were supposed to deposit a varying amount of money, and nobody who planned on coming back could afford to be mean. Of much smaller importance were the local, provincial chancelleries, which mostly served as archives for copies of various documents.
Besides their official functions, the royal chancelleries functioned as a kind of semi-official, very prestigious schools. The officials of the chancelleries, who often started their work after their studies, after several years of work, often went forward in the administrative hierarchy, often reaching important posts of bishops or other ecclesiastic or secular offices. Many enlightened chancellors did not restrict the positions in their staff to nobility (szlachta), and often sponsored intelligent applicants from other social classes, not only by hiring them to the chancellery but by paying for their studies at universities in Poland and abroad. Among the most esteemed 'graduates' of chancelleries wereJan Długosz,Martin Kromer andJan Zamoyski.
The Chancellor often gave speeches representing the royal will. The symbol of their office was theseal, which was used to seal all documents passing through his office. He also sealed documents signed by the monarch and could refuse to seal a document he considered illegal or damaging to the country (such documents had no power without his seal). When the king died, the seal was destroyed during the funeral and a new one given to him by the succeeding king. The seal's importance gave a rise to another name for the Chancellor – the sealer (Polishpieczętarz). Due to their important power the Chancellors were considered the guardians of the king and country, making sure a king's folly would not endanger the country by forcing it into an unnecessary war (among the wars prevented by the chancellors was a great crusade against theOttoman Empire planned by KingWładysław IV in the 1630s).
The chancellor's powers combined with the fact that wars required funds which were given by theSenat. The nobles (theszlachta) who controlled the Senate were usually unwilling to increasetaxes and levied upon them, which meant that Poland very rarely declared wars on its own. Usually it was attacked by its neighbors, and while it repelled all attacks till the end of the 18th century, it almost never utilized any of its victories. The army was undermanned and under equipped (since usually any suggestion of biggermilitary budget when enemy was not on the doorstep was labeled as warmongering) and lands ofRzeczpospolita were constantly ravaged by new invasions, crippling its economy.
There were many less important chancellors in the country. There was the Chancellor of the Queen. He had much less power than other (King's) Chancellors, he guarded the queen'sseal and was the second most important official of her court, after her Court Marshall. He had no right to a seat in the Senate. Even less important were the chancellors ofcrown princes and princesses, first introduced around the reign of Sigismund I. Then there was the chancellor of the most important of bishops,Primate of Poland,Archbishop of Gniezno. Finally some proudmagnates had officials who titled themselves chancellors.
| Portrait | Name | Lifespan | Term began | Term ended |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Jan | ? | 1107 | 1112 |
| Michał Awdaniec | ? | 1112 | 1113 |
| Goswin | ? | 1113 | 1138 |
| Lupus | ? | 1138 | 1145 |
| Pean | died in 1152 | 1145 | 1152 |
| Cherubin | died in 1180 | 1152 | 1172 |
| Klemens | ? | 1172 | 1173 |
| Stefan | ? | 1173 | 1206 |
.jpg) | Iwo Odrowąż | died 21 August 1229 | 1206 | 1208 |
| Wincenty z Niałka | died in 1232 | 1208 | 1211 |
| Jarost | ? | 1211 | 1212 |
| Marcin | ? | 1212 | 1213 |
| Nanker | died in 1250 | 1213 | 1241 |
| Wawrzęta Gutowski | ? | 1241 | 1243 |
| Rambold | ? | 1243 | 1262 |
 | Paweł z Przemankowa | died on 29 November 1292 | 1262 | 1266 |
| Stanisław z Krakowa | ? | 1266 | 1270 |
| Prokop | died in 1295 | 1270 | 1280 |
 | Andrzej Zaremba | died in 1318 | 1280 | 1290 |
| Wincenty | ? | 1290 | 1296 |
| Jan | died on 26 August 1296 | 1296 | 1296 |
| Piotr Angeli | ? | 1296 | 1306 |
| Franciszek z Krakowa | ? | 1306 | 1320 |
| Zbigniew z Szczyrzyca | ? | 1320 | 1356 |
 | Janusz Suchywilk | 1310 – 5 April 1382 | 1357 | 1373 |
 | Zawisza Kurozwęcki | died on 12 January 1382 | 1373 | 1379 |
 | Jan Radlica | died on 12 January 1392 | 1380 | 1386 |
| Mikołaj Zaklika | died in 1408 | 1386 | 1404 |
 | Mikołaj Kurowski | 1355–1411 | 1404 | 1411 |
 | Wojciech Jastrzębiec | 1362–1436 | 1411 | 1423 |
 | Jan Szafraniec | 1363 – 28 July 1433 | 1423 | 1433 |
 | Jan Taszka Koniecpolski | died on 26 March 1455 | 1433 or 1434 | 1454 |
 | Jan Gruszczyński | 1405 – 8 October 1473 | 1454 | 1469 |
 | Jakub Dembiński | 1427 – 15 January 1490 | 1469 | 1473 |
 | Uriel Górka | 1435 – 21 January 1498 | 1473 | 1479 |
| Stanisław Kurozwęcki | 1440–1482 | 1479 | 1482 |
| Krzesław Kurozwęcki | 1440–1503 | 1483 | 1503 |
 | Jan Łaski | 1456 – 19 May 1531 | 1503 | 1510 |
 | Maciej Drzewicki | 22 February 1467 – 22 August 1535 | 1510 | 1513 |
 | Krzysztof Szydłowiecki | 1467–1532 | 1513 or 1515 | 1532 |
 | Jan Chojeński | 17 March 1486 – 11 March 1538 | 1532 | 1538 |
 | Paweł Dunin-Wolski | 1487–1546 | 1539 | 1540 |
 | Tomasz Sobocki | 1508–1547 | 1540 | 1541 |
 | Samuel Maciejowski | 15 January 1499 – 26 October 1550 | 1541 | 1550 |
| Jan Ocieski | 1501 – 12 May 1563 | 1550 or 1552 | 1563 |
 | Walenty Dembiński | died in 1585 | 1564 | 1576 |
 | Piotr Dunin-Wolski | 1531–1590 | 1576 | 1578 |
| Jan Zamoyski | 19 March 1542 – 3 June 1605 | 1578 | 1605 |
| Maciej Pstrokoński | 1553–1609 | 1606 | 1609 |
 | Wawrzyniec Gembicki | 5 August 1559 – 10 February 1624 | 1609 | 1613 |
.jpg) | Feliks Kryski | 1562–1618 | 1613 | 1618 |
 | Stanisław Żółkiewski | 1547 – 7 October 1620 | 1618 | 1620 |
 | Andrzej Lipski | 1572 – 4 September 1631 | 1620 | 1623 |
 | Wacław Leszczyński | 1576 – 17 May 1628 | 1625 | 1628 |
 | Jakub Zadzik | 1582 – 17 March 1642 | 1628 | 1635 |
 | Tomasz Zamoyski | 1594 – 7 January 1638 | 1635 | 1635 |
.jpg) | Piotr Gembicki | 10 October 1585 – 14 July 1657 | 1635 | 1643 |
 | Jerzy Ossoliński | 15 December 1595 – 9 August 1650 | 1643 | 1650 |
 | Andrzej Leszczyński | 1608–1658 | 1650 | 1652 |
| Stefan Koryciński | 1617 – 4 July 1658 | 1652 | 1658 |
 | Mikołaj Prażmowski | 1617 – 15 April 1673 | 1658 | 1666 |
| Jan Leszczyński | 1603–1678 | 1666 | 1678 |
 | Jan Stefan Wydżga | 1610 – 6 September 1685 | 1678 | 1678 |
.png) | Jan Wielopolski | 1630 – 15 February 1688 | 1678 | 1688 |
 | Jerzy Albrecht Denhoff | 1640–1702 | 1688 | 1702 |
 | Karol Tarło | 1639–1702 | 1702 | 1702 |
 | Andrzej Chryzostom Załuski | 1650 – 12 May 1711 | 1702 | 1706 |
 | Jan Stanisław Jabłonowski | 1669 – 28 April 1731 | 1706 | 1709 |
 | Jan Szembek | died on 9 April 1731 | 1712 | 1731 |
 | Andrzej Stanisław Załuski | 2 December 1695 – 16 December 1758 | 1735 | 1746 |
| Jan Małachowski | 26 January 1698 – 25 June 1762 | 1746 | 1762 |
 | Andrzej Zamoyski | 12 February 1716 – 10 February 1792 | 1764 | 1767 |
 | Andrzej Młodziejowski | 1717–1780 | 1767 | 1780 |
 | Jan Andrzej Borch | 1715–1780 | 1780 | 1780 |
 | Antoni Onufry Okęcki | 13 June 1729 – 15 June 1793 | 1780 | 1786 |
 | Jacek Małachowski | 25 August 1737 – 27 March 1821 | 1786 | 1793 |
 | Antoni Sułkowski | 11 June 1735 – 16 April 1796 | 1793 | 1795 |