Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Cebu (historical polity)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Visayan historical polity in the Philippines
This article or sectionmay need to be rewritten to comply with Wikipedia'squality standards, as it usesBisaya Patronymesis Sri Visjaya,Aginid, Bayok sa Atong Tawarik, andHistory of Panay from the first inhabitants and the Bornean immigrants from which the Bisayans are descended to the Arrival of the Spaniards as sources— as Sri Visjaya has been proven to be incorrect, while the authenticity of the Aginid is disputed, and the History of Panay is considered a mere legend, as well as Macachor and Montebon's works, which is greatly sourced from the former three.You can help. Thetalk page may contain suggestions.(November 2021)

Cebu
Sugbu
c.1400–1565
Map of old Cebu in 1521, with Sugbu under Rajah Humabon colored as dark blue, and its subordinate barangays as lighter blue. Mactan under Si Lapulapu is colored yellow green.
Map of old Cebu in 1521, with Sugbu under Rajah Humabon colored as dark blue, and its subordinate barangays as lighter blue. Mactan under Si Lapulapu is colored yellow green.
CapitalSinghapala[1] (Modern Mabolo district inCebu City)
Common languagesOld Cebuano,Old Malay
Religion
Syncretic form ofHinduism,Buddhism andAnimism (see alsoPolytheism)
Roman Catholicism (since 1521)
GovernmentMonarchy
Rajah 
• 1521
Rajah Humabon
• 1521–1565[2]
Rajah Tupas (last)
History 
• Established
c.1400
• Disestablished
4 June 1565
CurrencyBarter
Succeeded by
Captaincy General of the Philippines
Cebu (province)
Today part ofPhilippines
Part ofa series on the
History ofthe Philippines
Timeline
flagPhilippines portal
Part ofa series on the
Pre-colonial history of the Philippines
Ruling class(Maginoo, Ginu, Tumao)
Middle class
Commoners, serfs, and slaves
  • Aliping namamahay
  • Alipin sa gigilid
  • Bulisik
  • Bulislis
  • Uluhan
  • Ulipon
See also:History of the Philippines

Cebu, also calledSugbu, informally referred to as theRajahnate of Cebu, was anIndianizedmandala (polity) monarchy on the island ofCebu[3] in the Philippines prior to the arrival of theSpanishconquistadors. It is known in ancient Chinese records as the nation of Sokbu (束務) (Hokkien) or Suwu (Mandarin).[4] According to Visayan oral legend, it was founded bySri Lumay[3] or Rajamuda Lumaya, a half-Malay and half-Tamil fromSumatra.[3][5] The capital of Cebu wasSinghapala[6] which is Tamil-Sanskrit[7] for "Lion City", the same root words with the modern city-state ofSingapore.

History

[edit]
See also:Hinduism in the Philippines,Religion in pre-colonial Philippines,Indosphere, andIndianisation

Foundation

[edit]
A picture of a Bronze Image of the Hindu GodShiva (lost during World War 2), found at Mactan-Cebu. It shows how the culture of the area was Hindu andIndianized.

A kingdom called Suwu[8] was mentioned in the 1225 Chinese Annals, the Zhufan Zhi (諸蕃志), and during the 17th Century this was the same name used for Cebu among Chinese traders to the Philippines thus it is presumed to be the same location.[4]

This kingdom was mentioned in association with Boni (Brunei) wherein it was written:

“The countries of Xilonggong (Sailunggung/Sailengkeng, possibly Selingaan Island ), Shimiao (Simmiu/Simbio), Rili (Jatlai/Jitleh, possibly Jelai ), Hulumantou (Wulomantau/Holobantau),Suwu (Somat/Sobut), Lima (Leima/Libeh), Danyu (Damjyu/Tamu), and Manuo (Manok/Belok) are located on islands in the sea. Their people travel to and fro in small boats, and their clothing and diet are the same as those of Boni. They produce sheng agarwood, lakawood, beeswax, and tortoiseshell. Merchants can trade for these with white porcelain ware, wine, rice, coarse salt, white spun silk, and trade-quality gold."[8]

— Zhao Rukuo

According to Visayan folklore, Sri Lumay was a half-Tamil[3] and half-Malay[9][3] from Sumatra[3] who settled in theVisayas, and had several sons. One of his sons was Sri Alho, who ruled a land known asSialo which included the present-day towns ofCarcar andSantander in the southern region of Cebu. Sri Ukob ruled a polity known asNahalin in the north, which included the present-day towns ofConsolacion,Liloan,Compostela,Danao,Carmen andBantayan. He died in battle, fighting with the MuslimMoro pirates known asmagalos (literally "destroyers of peace") fromMindanao.[10] The islands they were in were collectively known asPulua Kang Dayang orKangdaya (literally "[the islands] which belong to Daya").[11]

Sri Lumay was noted for his strict policies in defending against Moro Muslim raiders and slavers from Mindanao. His use ofscorched earth tactics to repel invaders gave rise to the nameKang Sri Lumayng Sugbu (literally "that of Sri Lumay's great fire") to the town, which was later shortened to Sugbu ("scorched earth").[11]

Cebuano and Visayan Raids

[edit]
See also:Visayans (Historical People)

Among the Chinese, especially during the Ming era, the people of Cebu and the surrounding groups from nearby islands (IncludingButuan,Samar,Leyte,Negros,Panay, andNorthern Mindanao) were grouped under the term of Visayans and are called Peshiye.[12]

The areas known as Pisheye were probably located in lowland coastal regions with minimal agricultural activity, a description thatCebu fits well.[12]

The Visayans were described to have invadedEastern Taiwan and had raided Southern China, especially the city ofQuanzhou, and towns of Shui'ao and Weito.[12]

Reign of Sri Bantug

[edit]

Sri Lumay was succeeded by the youngest of his sons, Sri Bantug, who ruled from a region known asSinghapala, which is nowMabolo of Cebu City. He died of disease. Sri Bantug had a brother called Sri Parang who was originally slated to succeed Sri Bantug. But he was a cripple and could not govern his polity because of his infirmity. Parang handed his throne to Sri Bantug's son and his nephew, Sri Humabon (also spelled Sri Hamabar), who became the rajah of Cebu in his stead.

Reign of Rajah Humabon

[edit]

DuringRajah Humabon's reign, the region had since become an important trading center where agricultural products were bartered. From Japan,perfume andglass utensils were usually traded for native goods.Ivory products, leather, precious and semi-precious stones andśarkarā (sugar) mostly came fromIndia andBurma traders.[9] The harbors of Sugbu (the modern-dayParián district of Cebu) became known colloquially assinibuayang hingpit ("the place for trading"), shortened tosibu orsibo ("to trade"), from which the modernCastilian name "Cebú" originates. It was also during Humabon's reign thatLapulapu arrived fromBorneo, and was granted by Humabon the region of Mandawili (nowMandaue), including the island known as Opong or Opon (later known asMactan). First contact with the Spanish also occurred during Humabon's reign, resulting in the death ofFerdinand Magellan.[11]

The phraseKota Raya Kita[13] was documented by historian Antonio Pigafetta, to be a warning in theOld Malay language, from a merchant to the rajah and was cited to have meant:

"Have good care, O king, what you do, for these men are those who have conquered Calicut, Malacca, and all India the Greater. If you give them good reception and treat them well, it will be well for you, but if you treat them ill, so much the worse it will be for you, as they have done at Calicut and at Malacca."[14]

In reality, this phrase is that ofKota Raya kita, an indigenousMalay phrase of merchants under the authority of Rajah Humabon, with a meaning in English of: "our capital city":Kota (fortress),Raya (great, hence Kotaraya (capital city)),kita (we).

Diplomacy with other Southeast Asian Kingdoms

[edit]

Cebu had diplomatic recognition among the other kingdoms of Southeast Asia. When Ferdinand Magellan's expedition landed on the port-kingdom of Cebu; the expedition scribe noted that not long before, an embassy carried by a ship from Siam (Thailand) arrived at Cebu and paid tribute to Rajah Humabon.[15][16]

Dependencies of Cebu

[edit]

Antonio Pigafetta, the expedition scribe, enumerated the towns and dependencies Cebu had.[17]

“In this island of Zubu there are dogs and cats, and other animals, whose flesh is eaten; there is also rice, millet, panicum, and maize; there are also figs, oranges, lemons, sugar-canes, cocos, gourds, ginger, honey, and other such things; they also make palm-wine of many qualities. Gold is abundant. The island is large, and has a good port with two entrances: one to the west, and the other to the east-north-east. It is in ten degrees north latitude and 154 east longitude from the line of demarcation.”

“In this island there are several towns, each of which has its principal men or chiefs. Here are the names of the towns and their chiefs:—

Cingapola: its chiefs are Cilaton, Ciguibucan, Cimaninga, Cimaticat, Cicanbul.

Mandani: its chief is Aponoaan.

Lalan: its chief is Teten.

Lalutan: its chief is Japau.

Lubucin: its chief is Cilumai.

— Antonio Pigafetta

It is notable how the Spanish mispronounced the Tamil "Singhapala" (சிங்கப்பூர்) as "Cingapola".

Battle of Mactan

[edit]

TheBattle of Mactan was fought on 27 April 1521 between forces of Rajah Humabon which included the Portuguese explorerFerdinand Magellan andLapulapu, which resulted in the death of the former himself.

Reign of Rajah Tupas and the Legazpi Expedition

[edit]

Sri Parang, the limp, also had a young son, Sri Tupas, also known asRajah Tupas who succeeded Rajah Humabon as king of Cebu.[5] There is linguistic evidence that Cebu tried to preserve its Indian-Malay roots as time wore on since Antonio Pigafetta the scribe of Magellan described Rajah Tupas' father, the brother of Rajah Humabon as a "Bendara" which means "Treasurer" or "Vizier" in Sanskritized Malay[6] and is a shortening of the word "Bendahara" (भाण्डार) which means "Storage house" in Sanskrit.[18] The Hindu polity was dissolved during the reign ofRajah Tupas by the forces of conquistadorMiguel López de Legazpi in the battle of Cebu during 1565.[2]

Relations with other kingdoms

[edit]
See also:Butuan (historical polity) andMaynila (historical polity)

The rajahs of Cebu were relatives to the rajahs ofButuan.[20] Thus the monarchies of Cebu and Butuan had relations with each other, as evidenced by the fact that Rajah Colambu of Butuan gave guidance to the Magellan expedition to reach the island ofCebu.[21] The rajahs of Butuan were descendants of Rajah Kiling, who according to Researcher Eric Casino, were not Visayan in origin but rather, Indian, because Kiling refers to the people of India.[22] TheSejarah Melayu (Malay Annals) of the nearby country of Malaysia, point to the similarly wordedKeling as the immigrant people from India to Southeast Asia.[23]

However, Cebu was not at peace with all kingdoms.Maynila, which was under the influence ofBrunei[24] and would later become the city ofManila[24] had an arrogant attitude against Cebuanos and Visayans as the rajah of Maynila who had an Islamic name,Rajah Sulayman, ridiculed the Visayans that came and assisted the Legazpi expedition (which also included the Cebuanos) as an easily conquerable people.[25] Fernao Mendes Pinto, among the earlier Portuguese colonists of Southeast Asia, pointed out that there were Muslims and non-Muslims among the inhabitants of the Philippines who fought each other.[26]

Legacy

[edit]

Indianization, although it was superseded by Hispanization, left markers in the Cebuano language and culture, such as religious practices and common vocabulary words whose origins are fromSanskrit andTamil.[27] There is also genetic evidence ofSouth Asian or Indian Hindu influence in Cebu as according to genetic studies, the people ofCebu andBohol have as much as 10-20% of their genetics taken fromSouth Asian admixture.[28]

Social hierarchy

[edit]

Below the rulers were theTimawa, the feudal warrior class of the ancient Visayan societies of the Philippines who were regarded as higher than theuripon (commoners,serfs, and slaves) but below thetumao (royalnobility) in the social hierarchy. They were roughly similar to theTagalogMaharlika class.

Hindu-Buddhist artifacts

[edit]

In 1921, Henry Otley Beyer found a crude Buddhist medallion and a copper statue of a Hindu deity,Ganesha, in ancient sites inPuerto Princesa, Palawan and in Mactan, Cebu.[29] The crudeness of the artifacts indicates they were of local reproduction. The icons were destroyed during World War II. However, black and white photographs of these icons survive.

Modern name usage

[edit]

There have been proposals to rename the currentCentral Visayas region, which is dominated by the Cebuano ethnic group, into Sugbu region, the former name of the region prior to Spanish colonization in the 16th century.[30][31]

See also

[edit]
Related to Cebu polity
Other related

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^Valeros, Maria Eleanor E. (September 13, 2009)."The Aginid".Philstar.com.Archived from the original on June 12, 2018. RetrievedMay 10, 2018.
  2. ^abScott, William Henry (1992).Looking for the Prehispanic Filipino and Other Essays in Philippine History. Quezon City: New Day Publishers.ISBN 978-971-10-0524-5.
  3. ^abcdefSantarita, J. B. (2018). Panyupayana: The Emergence of Hindu Polities in the Pre-Islamic Philippines. Cultural and Civilisational Links Between India and Southeast Asia, 93–105.
  4. ^abSONG, MING, AND OTHER CHINESE SOURCES ON PHILIPPINES-CHINA RELATIONSArchived March 8, 2023, at theWayback Machine By Carmelea Ang See. Page 74.
  5. ^abAbellana, Jovito (1952).Aginid, Bayok sa Atong Tawarik.
  6. ^abTHE GENEALOGY OF HARI' TUPAS: AN ETHNOHISTORY OF CHIEFLY POWER AND HIERARCHY IN SUGBU AS A PROTOSTATE Astrid Sala-BozaArchived April 5, 2023, at theWayback Machine Page 280.
  7. ^"5 other places in Asia which are also called Singapura By Joshua Lee".Archived from the original on April 6, 2023. RetrievedDecember 9, 2021.
  8. ^ab""A Chinese Gazetteer of Foreign Lands" A new translation of Part 1 of the Zhufan zhi 諸蕃志 (1225) By Shao-yun Yang (Department of History, Denison University)".Archived from the original on February 1, 2023. RetrievedOctober 14, 2024.
  9. ^abQuirino, Karl (September 1, 2010)."The Rajahnate of Cebu".The Bulwagan Foundation Trust.Archived from the original on October 27, 2019. RetrievedMay 1, 2021.
  10. ^Montebon, Marivir R. (2000).Retracing Our Roots: A Journey Into Cebu's Precolonial and Colonial Past. Minglanilla, Cebu: ES Villaver Pub. p. 15.ISBN 971-92309-0-8.
  11. ^abcMacachor, Celestino C. (2011)."Searching for Kali in the Indigenous Chronicles of Jovito Abellana".Rapid Journal.10 (2). Archived fromthe original on July 3, 2012.
  12. ^abcA Chinese Gazetteer of Foreign Lands, A new translation of Part 1 of the Zhufan zhi 諸蕃志 (1225), By Shao-yun Yang (Denison University)
  13. ^Approximated asCata Raya Chita using Italianate orthography.
  14. ^Pigafetta, A., Nancy-Libri-Phillipps-Beinecke-Yale codex, Skelton, R.A. English translation. pg. 71
  15. ^"Notes from Mactan By Jim Foster".Archived from the original on July 7, 2023. RetrievedJanuary 23, 2023.
  16. ^"PRIMO VIAGGIO INTORNO AL MONDO"Archived January 23, 2023, at theWayback Machine By Antonio Pigafetta. MS. composed ca. 1525, of events of 1519–1522 (Page 138)
  17. ^The First Voyage Round the World by Antonio Pigafetta, translated by Lord Stanley of Alderley (Page 105)
  18. ^Becoming Indian: The Unfinished Revolution of Culture and Identity by Pavan K. Varma p.125
  19. ^Sala-Boza, Astrid (2006). "The Genealogy of Hari' Tupas: An Ethnohistory of Chiefly Power and Hierarchy in Sugbu as a Protostate".Philippine Quarterly of Culture and Society.34 (3):253–311.JSTOR 29792596.
  20. ^The book Aginid recounts the beginning of Cebu as having been founded by Bataugong and Balintawak, supposedly Humabon's great-grandparents. The book further narrates how the descendants of this couple founded their own chiefdoms and the narrative shows that the rulers of Butuan, for instance, were relatives of Humabon.[19]
  21. ^Jackson, Emma (2020).Ferdinand Magellan's Voyage and its Legacy in the Philippines(PDF). Proceedings of The National Conference On Undergraduate Research (NCUR) 2020 Montana State University, Bozeman MT March 26–28, 2020.
  22. ^Casino, Eric (2014). "The Barangays of Butuan: Lumad Mindanaoans in China and the Sulu Zone".Asia Mindanaw: Dialogue of Peace and Development: 2.
  23. ^"A Historical Perspective on the Word 'Keling'".Sejarah Melayu.Archived from the original on April 21, 2017. RetrievedApril 24, 2017.
  24. ^abNakpil, Carmen Guerrero (October 29, 2003)."Carmen Nakpil: Manila Under the Muslims". Malaya. Archived fromthe original on March 4, 2009. RetrievedDecember 5, 2008 – via www.newsflash.org.
  25. ^Scott, William Henry (1994).Barangay: Sixteenth Century Philippine Culture and Society. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.ISBN 978-971-550-135-4.
  26. ^Pinto, Fernão Mendes (1989) [1578].The Travels of Mendes Pinto. Translated by Catz, Rebecca D. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.ISBN 9780226669519.
  27. ^Kuizon, Jose G. (1962).The Sanskrit loan-words in Cebuano-Bisayan language and the Indian elements to Cebuano-Bisayan culture (Thesis). University of San Carlos, Cebu.OCLC 3061923.
  28. ^Delfin, Frederick; Min-Shan Ko, Albert; Li, Mingkun; Gunnarsdóttir, Ellen D.; Tabbada, Kristina A.; Salvador, Jazelyn M.; Calacal, Gayvelline C.; Sagum, Minerva S.; Datar, Francisco A.; Padilla, Sabino G.; De Ungria, Maria Corazon A.; Stoneking, Mark (2014)."Complete mtDNA genomes of Filipino ethnolinguistic groups: A melting pot of recent and ancient lineages in the Asia-Pacific region".European Journal of Human Genetics.22 (2):228–237.doi:10.1038/ejhg.2013.122.PMC 3895641.PMID 23756438.
  29. ^Churchill, Malcolm H. (1977)."Indian Penetration of Pre-Spanish Philippines: A New Look at the Evidence"(PDF).Asian Studies.15:21–45.Archived(PDF) from the original on February 19, 2018. RetrievedDecember 14, 2018.
  30. ^"Change in Name Will be Good for Philippines".Inquirer.net. July 15, 2016.Archived from the original on June 29, 2018. RetrievedMay 1, 2021.
  31. ^"Should the Philippines be Renamed? Historian Weighs In".ABS-CBN News. June 13, 2017.Archived from the original on February 18, 2019. RetrievedMay 1, 2021.

Historical and present-daystates in thePhilippines
   
Pre-16th century
before 900–1589:Tondo
before 971–after 1339:Ma-i
before 989–1521:Butuan
before the 11th century–1571:Namayan
before 1225–1576:Pangasinan andCaboloan
c. 13th century–1457:Lupah Sug
c. after the 11th century–1569:Madja-as
c. 1350–1905:Sultanate of Buayan
c. 1400–1565:Cebu
1457–1915:Sultanate of Sulu
c. 1500–1571:Maynila
1515–1899:Sultanate of Maguindanao
unknown–1581:Kumintang
unknown–1593:Bo-ol/Dapitan
unknown–1571:Cainta
16th century
1565–1898:Spanish East Indies
17th century
1616–1904:Confederate States of Lanao
18th century
1762–1764:British Manila
Map of the Philippines from "Harper's Pictorial History of the War with Spain" Vol. II (1899)
Map of the Philippines from "Harper's Pictorial History of the War with Spain" Vol. II (1899)
Pre-colonial Philippine royalty of thepost-classical era and theearly modern period
Royalty of Luzon
Lakans, datus, and rajahs ofTondo
Rajahs ofMaynila
Lakans ofNamayan
  • Tagkan
  • Palaba
  • Laboy
  • Kalamayin
  • Martin
Datus ofMadja-as
  • Puti
  • Sumakwel
  • Bangkaya
  • Balengkaka
  • Manduyog
  • Padojinog
  • Kabnayag
  • Lubay
  • Paiburong
Datus and rajahs ofCebu
Rajahs ofButuan
  • Kiling
  • Bata Shaja
  • Siagu
  • Kolambu
Sultans ofMaguindanao
Sultans ofSulu
Sultans ofBuayan
  • Mamu
  • Budtul
  • Malang-sa-Inged
  • Silongan
  • Monkay
  • Baratamay
  • Maitum
  • Bangon
  • Bayao
  • Utto
  • Ali
Debatable, legend-based or disputed rulers are initalics.
Sovereign states
States with
limited recognition
Dependencies and
other territories
India-related topics in Philippines articles
History
Geography
Religion
Politics
Language
Economy
Culture
People
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cebu_(historical_polity)&oldid=1318423972"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp