 | Theneutrality of this article isdisputed. Relevant discussion may be found on thetalk page. Please do not remove this message untilconditions to do so are met.(September 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights | |
 Logo of the Catholic League | |
| Formation | 1973; 52 years ago (1973) |
|---|---|
| Founder | Virgil Blum |
| Founded at | Milwaukee,Wisconsin, US |
| Legal status | 501(c)(3) organization |
| Purpose | Roman Catholicadvocacy |
| Headquarters | New York City,New York, US |
Region | United States |
President | Bill Donohue |
Chairman | Walter Knysz Jr. |
| Revenue | US$3.5 million[1] (2019) |
| Expenses | US$3.3 million[1] (2019) |
| Endowment | US$30.8 million[2] (2019) |
| Staff | 10 |
| Website | https://www.catholicleague.org/ |
TheCatholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, often shortened to theCatholic League, is an AmericanCatholic organization whose stated purpose is to "defend the right of Catholics – lay and clergy alike – to participate in American public life without defamation or discrimination."[3] The Catholic League states that it is "motivated by the letter and the spirit of theFirst Amendment ... to safeguard both the religious freedom rights and the free speech rights of Catholics whenever and wherever they are threatened."[3] According to theEncyclopedia of American Religion and Politics, the league "is regarded by many as the preeminent organization representing the views of American lay Catholics."[4]
Founded in 1973 by theJesuit priestVirgil Blum, the Catholic League was formed to counterdiscrimination against Catholics in American government and popular culture. The low-profile group initiated public education campaigns and some lawsuits. In 1993 the group became much more aggressive with a new president, the former sociology professorBill Donohue, who also increased its size to become the largest Catholic advocacy organization in the US.[4] The Catholic League is known forpress releases about what it views asanti-Catholic andanti-Christian themes inmass media.
The Catholic League has taken a stand against anything they perceive as anti-Catholic, including the entertainment industry, certain art exhibits, school programs forsex education, government-fundedcontraception andabortion,media bias, restrictions againstanti-abortion activism, and restrictions onreligious schools.[5] It publishes a journal,Catalyst, and operates a website.
The league under Donohue's leadership is criticized for its conservatism and for its combative responses to high-profile media stories.[4][6] Besides education campaigns, the group issues condemnations, initiatesboycotts and protests, defends priests against accusations of child sexual abuse, fights proposed legislation and threatens legal action against what it sees as bigotry against Catholics, irreverence against religious figures, and attacks on Catholic dogma.[4][7] However, the Catholic League stresses that "it does not speak authoritatively for the Church as a whole."[4]
![[icon]](/mt/?noimg=&dark=on&url=http%3a%2f%2fen.wikipedia.org%2fwiki%2fFile%3aWiki_letter_w_cropped.svg) | This sectionneeds expansion. You can help byadding to it.(December 2007) |
The league was founded inMilwaukee on May 12, 1973, byVirgil Blum.[3][8][9] Blum served as president of the Catholic League until 1988.[3] John Tierney served as president from October 1990[10] to 1993.[11]
Since 1993, the league has been led by its board of directors president, Bill Donohue, who works with a small number of organizational staffers. In a 1999New York Times article, a reporter said Donohue ispragmatic in regards toreligion, "media savvy" and "steers clear of divisive debates ontheologicaldoctrines andsecular politics".[12] The article said Donohue "fans simmering anger with inflammatory news releases, a Web site and newsletter"[12] with "scathing attacks on the blasphemous and the irreverent".[12] In a 2007 interview,Salon Life staff writer Rebecca Traister discussed Donohue withFrances Kissling, former head of the organizationCatholics for Choice, which opposes Catholic teaching on abortion, who characterized Donohue as "abusive", and stated she avoided doing media interviews with him for this reason.[13]
The league is organized under a board of directors chaired by Walter Knysz. The league also has board of advisors, consisting of prominent lay Catholics likeBrent Bozell,Linda Chavez,Mary Ann Glendon,Alan Keyes,Tom Monaghan, andGeorge Weigel.[3] The league issues a journal,Catalyst, as well as reports, such asPope Pius XII and theHolocaust, books, brochures and an annualReport on Anti-Catholicism.[14]
The Catholic League is a lay Catholic organization that is independent of the Catholic Church. However, it is listed inThe Official Catholic Directory (see the Miscellaneous section under the Archdiocese of New York). According to aNew York Times interviewer, the organization "maintains close ties to theNew York Archdiocese leadership. Several bishops make personal donations.[citation needed]John Cardinal O'Connor spoke at the group's 25th anniversary reception in 1998 and vacated part of his suite for its expanding operations, said Joseph Zwilling, a spokesman for the Archdiocese of New York."[12]Timothy Cardinal Dolan spoke at the Catholic League's 50th anniversary celebration on April 27, 2023.[15] The league includes on its website endorsements from many prominent clerics.[3]
The New York Times reported that the Catholic League had 11,000 members when Donohue took over the group in 1993. By 1999, membership had grown to 350,000, two-thirds of whom were paying members.[12][dubious –discuss] This is the last estimate of overall membership that the league made. The league's 2003 statement showed 15,000 members inNassau andSuffolk counties of New York alone.[16] Annual donations entitle members to home delivery of the print version ofCatalyst, the group's monthly journal, which is also available for free on the Catholic League's website.[17]
The Catholic League says it is politically neutral, which is mostly required of non-profits. The website states, "The League wishes to be neither left nor right, liberal or conservative, revolutionary or reactionary."[3] Although often characterized as conservative[18][19][20][21] the league has at times been at odds with conservative figures and organizations. For example, they criticized the anti-illegal immigration group, theMinutemen, for opposing a San Diego priest's facilitation of employment for Latino immigrants and for condemning the church as a whole in public statements about the matter.[22] The Catholic League also condemned pastor and televangelistJohn Hagee for what they called "anti-Catholic hate speech" and called uponJohn McCain's 2008 presidential campaign to renounce this alleged bigotry.[23]
Christian Leftist John Swomley criticized the Catholic League as the "most dangerous of the far-right organizations."[4] Donohue has been called "right-wing"[24] and "a conservative reactionary who wants to undo the work ofVatican II and suppress varying opinions within the Church."[25]
In 1996, Donohue took issue withJoan Osborne over her song "One of Us", which explores the question of what it would be like ifGod were a human being.[26] Donohue questioned the point of the song and brought up heractivism calling for support ofRock for Choice and otherpro-choice groups stating, "It is no wonder that Joan Osborne instructs her fans to donate their time and money toPlanned Parenthood. It is of a piece with her politics and her prejudices. Her songs and videos offer a curious mix of both, the effect of which is to dance awfully close to the line of Catholic baiting."[27] Religious educator Paul Moses stated that Donohue's was a "tortured reading" and he saw Osborne as having "the Catholic imagination" with the song "awakening ... spiritual hunger".[28] Osborne said, in a letter to fans, that "the church's attitudes toward women and gays make the pope look far more ridiculous than any pop song could" and that she did not write the song, which "speaks of the pope only with respect."[28] Donohue also admitted that he was treating the issue in a "kind of aprophylactic approach" because "cultures are changed as a result of patterns."[28]
In 1997, Donohue declared theABC showNothing Sacred as deeply offensive to Catholicism, although notanti-Catholic in the traditional sense.[29][30] Calling for aboycott, he stated that the show portrayed Catholics with a traditional view as cold or cruel while glorifying more the maverick, irreverent voices in the community. However, the show was defended by some Catholics and had been written with the consultation ofJesuits, from which it later won theHumanitas Prize. Many Catholics agreed with him that the show was hostile to the beliefs and values of the Catholic Church, and ABC canceledNothing Sacred after less than a season, reportedly for poor ratings. Observers think Donohue may have played a significant role in the show's rapid demise as advertisers often become leery of shows deemed "controversial".[31][32] With regard to the controversy,Henry Herx, director of theUnited States Conference of Catholic Bishops' Office of Film and Broadcast (successor to theNational Legion of Decency), emphasized that the Catholic League is not an official agency of the church.[33]
The year 1999 saw the release ofKevin Smith's controversial filmDogma. Smith was a practicing Catholic, as Kevin Smith confirmed in an interview on the film'sDVD. Several religious groups, especially the Catholic League, said the film was anti-Catholic andblasphemous, and organized protests, including one that took place at the October 4 premiere of the film atLincoln Center inNew York City.[34]
Smith said that several of the protests occurred before the film was even finished, suggesting that the protests were more about media attention for the groups than for whatever was controversial about the film.[35] The Catholic League's main complaints were that the film's main character is supposedly a descendant ofMary, who happens to work in anabortion clinic, which were seen as ironic conventions for a Catholic.[citation needed] The film's distributor,Miramax, removed its name from the production, and hired attorneyDan Petrocelli to defend it publicly. Petrocelli accused Donohue of trying to stir a violent reaction to the film. Donohue responded by taking out an op-ed ad in theNew York Times on September 12, 1999, quoting attempts by Petrocelli and Smith to stifle his free speech.[36]
According to Smith, "[Donohue] actually invited me out to have a beer after making my life hell for six months."[37]
Donohue is a staunch defender ofMel Gibson's filmThe Passion of the Christ. On the December 8, 2004, broadcast ofScarborough Country, he stated: "Hollywood is controlled by secular Jews who hate Christianity in general and Catholicism in particular. It's not a secret, OK? And I'm not afraid to say it. That's why they hate this movie. It's about Jesus Christ, and it's about truth. It's about theMessiah."[38]
In Donohue's book,Secular Sabotage: How Liberals Are Destroying Religion and Culture in America, he responded to what he believed was a misrepresentation of his comments via taking them out of context. For example, in that same interview, he said the following: "You have got secular Jews. You have got a lot of ex-Catholic priests who hate the Catholic Church, wacko Protestants in the same group." Later in the debate, in that same segment of the interview, he said, "There are secularists from every ethnic and religious stock," emphasizing that when people talk about Hollywood, they are "talking mostly about secular Jews."[39]
In his book, Donohue also wrote the following: "TheForward, a Jewish weekly, published an editorial in 2004 saying it was merely a 'sociological observation' to note that 'Jews run Hollywood.' The newspaper quite rightly said that to say 'the Jews run Hollywood' is an entirely different matter, one that smacks of anti-Semitism. So it concluded that 'No, 'the Jews' don't run Hollywood. But Jews do, just as Koreans predominate in New York dry-cleaning and blacks rule in basketball.'"[39]
AfterUS PresidentGeorge W. Bush used the term "Holidays" instead of "Christmas" on theWhite House 2005 Christmas cards, Donohue stated "The Bush administration has suffered a loss of will and ... they have capitulated to the worst elements in our culture."[40]
Donohue demanded thatJohn Edwards fire two ofhis presidential campaign staffers in February 2007, charging that they were "anti-Catholic, vulgar, trash-talking bigots." He cited a blog written byAmanda Marcotte regardingthe church's opposition to birth control, saying it forces women "to bear more tithing Catholics". He also cited another posting called "Pope andFascists". Donohue also objected to one of the staffers describing President Bush's "wingnut Christofacist base".
Donohue called the statements "incendiary" and "inflammatory", saying, "It's scurrilous and has no place being part of someone's resume who's going to work for a potential presidential contender." On February 8, John Edwards addressed the writings of the staffers, Amanda Marcotte and Melissa McEwan, saying "that kind of intolerant language will not be permitted from anyone on my campaign, whether it's intended as satire, humor or anything else."[41] Donohue insisted that Edwards fire the pair immediately.
After the complaints, Marcotte wrote, "The Christian version of thevirgin birth is generally interpreted as super-patriarchal where God is viewed as so powerful he can impregnate without befouling himself by touching a woman, and women are nothing but vessels." After Marcotte parted with the campaign, Donohue stated, "It is not enough that one foul-mouthed anti-Christian bigot, Amanda Marcotte, has quit. Melissa McEwan must go as well. Either Edwards shows her the door or she bolts on her own. There is no third choice – the Catholic League will see to it that this issue won't go away." He continued, "The Edwards campaign is in total disarray and the meltdown will continue unless McEwan is removed from his staff. The fact that Marcotte had to quit suggests that Edwards doesn't have the guts to do what is morally right." McEwan resigned on February 13, 2007,[42] citing the hostility of the Catholic League and emails threateningrape andmurder.[43]
On September 8, 2007,Kathy Griffin won her firstEmmy for season two of reality showKathy Griffin: My Life on the D-List. Griffin stirred up controversy with her acceptance speech, saying that "a lot of people come up here and thank Jesus for this award. I want you to know that no one had less to do with this award than Jesus. He didn't help me a bit." She went on to hold up her Emmy and say, "Suck it, Jesus, this award is my god now!"[44]
Her remarks were quickly condemned by Donohue, who urged the TV academy to "denounce Griffin's obscene and blasphemous comment."[45] After theAcademy of Television Arts & Sciences decided to censor Griffin's remark, Donohue said, "The Academy of Television Arts & Sciences reacted responsibly to our criticism of Kathy Griffin's verbal assault on 85 percent of the US population. The ball is now in Griffin's court. The self-described 'complete militant atheist' needs to make a swift and unequivocal apology to Christians. If she does, she will get this issue behind her. If she does not, she will be remembered as a foul-mouthed bigot for the rest of her life."[46]
In a statement issued by her publicist, Griffin responded to the denouncement by the Catholic League with a question: "Am I the only Catholic left with a sense of humor?"[44]
As part of a two-month protest campaign, Donohue called for a boycott of the filmThe Golden Compass, believing that while the religious elements of the film would be "watered down" from the source novels, the film would still encourage children to read the series, which Donohue says "denigrates Christianity" and promotes "atheism for kids",[47] citing authorPhilip Pullman as saying that he is "trying to undermine the basis of Christian belief."[48] Donohue hopes that "the film [will fail] to meet box office expectations and that [Pullman's] books attract few buyers."[49] The call for a boycott resulted in action by some Catholic groups in the US and Canada, and a Catholic school board inOntario has ordered the source novel removed from its library shelves. Pullman has since said that the books do not have a religious agenda, saying of Donohue's call for a boycott, "Why don't we trust readers? Why don't we trust filmgoers? Oh, it causes me to shake my head with sorrow that such nitwits could be loose in the world."[50] Pullman described the Catholic League as "a tiny, unrepresentative organisation," suggesting that "the only person Bill Donohue represents is himself."[51]
A lay person who reviews movies for the bishops' conference gave the movie high marks, but after the protest by the Catholic League, the bishops ordered this review to be withdrawn.[52]
Other evangelical groups, such asThe Christian Film and Television Commission, adopted a "wait-and-see" approach to the film before deciding upon any action,[53] as did theRoman Catholic Church in Britain.[50]
Some commentators indicated that they believed the criticism would prove ultimately impotent and that the negative publicity would prove a boon for the film's box office.[54][55]
According to Donohue, this prediction proved to be false.[56] The movie did so poorly at the box office, Donohue says, that Pullman decided not to go forward with the sequels and blamed Donohue for his decision.[57]
Donohue's position on this controversy was spelled out in a 31-page booklet, "The Golden Compass: Agenda Unmasked". It details his objections to what he said were Pullman's anti-Catholic comments, his books, and the movie.[58]
In July 2008, a controversy arose surrounding aCommunion rite altercation involving Webster Cook, a student and member of theUniversity of Central Florida (UCF) student senate. Cook attended aCatholic Mass on campus and wasgiven the Eucharist butwalked out without consuming it. This action was allegedly related to his protest of the use of public funds for organized worship in the student union hall. According to Donohue, Cook's actions were a form of desecration of the sacrament. Cook was proposed for censure by the student senate and was criticized by local media. He also received numerous death threats.[59][60]
On his blogPharyngula, biologist andUniversity of Minnesota Morris (UMM) professorPZ Myers publicly expressed support for Cook as well as outrage thatFox News appeared to be inciting readers to cause further problems for the student.[59][61][62] Myers invited readers to acquire some consecrated Eucharistic Hosts, which he described as "crackers", for him to treat "with profound disrespect."[63]
The Catholic League accused Myers of anti-Catholic bigotry and asked UMM and the Minnesota State Legislature to take action against Myers.[64][65] Myers then also received threats andhate mail.[66] The Catholic League also called for Cook to be expelled from the university, with Donohue describing his confiscation of the Eucharist as ahate crime as well as a form ofkidnapping.[63] Donohue also accused those who supported Cook of anti-Catholic bigotry, and sent a letter to the UCF asking them to take legal action against Cook.[67] A week after the initial communion Cook apologized and returned the Host. The Catholic League, however, continued to lobby the university for his expulsion.[67]
In March 2007, a sculpture created by the Italian-Canadian artistCosimo Cavallaro was to be displayed atManhattan'sRoger Smith Hotel. The sculpture, entitled "My Sweet Lord", was of a crucified Christ, nude, in molded chocolate. Although the artist is a practicing Catholic, Bill Donohue decried the work as "hate speech", "garbage", and "one of the worst assaults on Christian sensibilities ever,"[citation needed] describing Cavallaro as a "loser artist" and telling him in a television interview onAnderson Cooper 360, "You're lucky I'm not like theTaliban, because you would lose more than your head."[citation needed]
Under the leadership of Donohue, the Catholic League organized a boycott of the hotel aimed at forcing it to remove the statue. The hotel's management stating that the protests "brought to our attention the unintended reaction of you and other conscientious friends", eventually agreed to the league's calls, prompting the curator of the gallery, Matt Semler, to resign in protest.[68] Semler said the six-foot sculpture was the victim of "a strong-arming from people who haven't seen the show, seen what we're doing. They jumped to conclusions completely contrary to our intentions."[68]
Donohue said, in October 2009, that the Catholic Church has a "homosexual", not a "pedophilia", problem, citing theJohn Jay Report.[69] The Catholic League has blamed theSurvivors Network of those Abused by Priests (SNAP), for having "hired, hidden, defended, enabled, ignored and concealed the crimes of child molesters."[70] The Catholic League defended attacking SNAP on the grounds that they were "a menace to the Catholic Church."[71]
In a November 18, 2009,Politics Daily column about Smith's research, David Gibson reported that sexual identity should be "separated from the problem of sexual abuse," according to criminologist Margaret Smith. Smith said, "we do not find a connection between homosexual identity and an increased likelihood of sexual abuse."[72] Nevertheless, Donohue says that this is a homosexual problem in the Catholic Church and not a pedophile one.[72]
Donohue has been asked to respond to Smith's position many times. He argues that "if the acts were of a homosexual nature, and we know they were, it does not matter what the self-perception of the victimizers were."[73]
On May 20, 2009,Reuters reported the results of a nine-year investigation by theCommission to Inquire into Child Abuse, which looked into decades of endemic sexual abuse against children in Catholic-run reform schools in Ireland.[74] In reaction to this report, popularly known as the Ryan Report, Donohue issued a statement downplaying the seriousness of the cases, questioning the inclusion of voyeurism and "inappropriate sexual talk" as instances of sexual abuse along with the more serious charge of rape.[75] Donohue said that rape constituted only 12 percent of the listed sexual abuse cases in the Ryan report, and that priests committed only 12 percent of the listed rapes – the other 88 percent were committed by laypersons andreligious brothers.[75]
Since the Ryan Report was released, Donohue has been defending the church and saying that much of the outrage is "moral hysteria". While stating that he agrees that rape and physical abuse are wrong and that he would not defend those actions, he says the report has conflated these abuses with "lesser" forms of punishment and is therefore not as serious. He also says many of the purported forms of abuse found by the commission were present and acceptable in the time period.[76]
The Irish politician and child rape victimColm O'Gorman was highly critical of such statements made by Donohue on the Irish radio showThe Last Word.[76] O'Gorman later wrote that Donohue's analysis was shockingly "simplistic".[77]
In 2014, in the face of a public pressure campaign calling for theCommission of Investigation into Mother and Baby Homes and certain related matters in Ireland, Bill Donohue began his own campaign to challenge the prevailing narrative, going so far as to author a special report on the subject.[78] Donohue largely dismissed the critics as being motivated by politics or liking "to bash the Church."[79] Donohue took exception with the findings presented byCatherine Corless, who he described as "an amateur historian." Donohue and Corless debated on Irish radio, and he wrote extensively challenging her work and her credentials. Additionally, Donohue found flaws with how the media portrayed the mass graves found at the Mother and Baby Home, claiming that "the statement issued by the Mother and Baby Commission was disturbing, but it never mentioned anything about a mass grave."[80] From 2014 to 2017, Donohue issued two special reports and numerous pieces exploring why he believed this story was evidence of anti-Catholicism.
When PresidentBarack Obama named gay activist[81] Harry Knox to theWhite House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships in 2009, Donohue termed Knox "an anti-Catholic bigot who has called the pope a liar."[81]
In November 2010, a portion of a video by the late artistDavid Wojnarowicz, which was included in an exhibit focused on gay-themed art, "Hide/Seek: Difference and Desire in American Portraiture"at theNational Portrait Gallery, was removed after complaints from theCatholic League.[82] ColumnistFrank Rich said of the intervention and removal that theSmithsonian had been "bullied by bigots" and quoted theLos Angeles Times art critic, Christopher Knight, to the same effect.[83] Tracing the evolution of the issue, Rich cited a piece by Kriston Capps which in turn said "the role of Penny Starr remains hazy. [However, a]...reporter and conservative advocate, [Starr] deserves much credit for both instigating" the negative attention to the piece of art amongst a number in the show.[84]
Donohue's central complaint was the content of the "vile video", as he called it. He objected to the video because it showed "large ants eating away at Jesus on a crucifix," and was hosted in a museum funded by taxpayers.[85]
Responding toDavid Kertzer's book andAlfred Uhry's play about theMortara case, in which a Jewish boy was kidnapped on the order of theSupreme Sacred Congregation of the Roman and Universal Inquisition, the Catholic League charged: "Whether it's based on fact or fiction, or whether it’s portrayed on the stage or on the screen, the Catholic bashers are a busy lot these days. They are as good at twisting the facts as they are at developing fictional accounts. Truth doesn’t matter. What matters is results."[86]
What Donohue said was as follows.
Why was Mortara baptized in the first place? Because the servant girl thought he was dying and was in need of salvation. Why was he taken from his family? Because it was the considered judgment of the Church at the time that a baptized Christian could not be raised in a Jewish home. He had to be removed lest the Church be party to apostasy. The validity of Baptism was also being tested. And so what happened to this poor kid? As he grew up he developed a father-son relationship with Pope Pius IX. He even became a priest.[87]
In January 2023, the Catholic League releasedWalt's Disenchanted Kingdom. This documentary recounts the cultural shift atDisney. The film was written and directed by Jason Killian Meath.Bill Donohue served as the executive producer. It is hosted byMercedes Schlapp and features interviews with Donohue,Tony Perkins,Ben Carson,Vivek Ramaswamy,Miranda Devine,Brent Bozell,David Horowitz, and Christian Toto. The film was initially released to SalemNow,YouTube, Rumble, andAmazon Prime Video.[88]
Walt's Disenchanted Kingdom has been aired at several film festivals, including the Indie Short Fest where it won technical awards for "best editing" and "best sound editing" along with an Outstanding Achievement Award.[89][90]
When theLos Angeles Dodgers planned their annualPride Night in 2023, they invited theSisters of Perpetual Indulgence, a charity group of gay men who dress up as nuns to bring attention to sexual intolerance and gender. The team received backlash from the Catholic League, Sen.Marco Rubio, andCatholic Vote. Catholic League president Bill Donohue sent a letter to commissionerRob Manfred comparing the group's performances toblackface. The Dodgers subsequently disinvited the group, likely owing to the large Catholic population of the city. KNBC reported that "the Dodgers pulled the Sisters from their Pride Night the day after Bill Donohue, president and CEO of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, had emailedMajor League Baseball CommissionerRob Manfred to urge the team to yank the group."[91]
In response, theLos Angeles LGBT Center, theACLU, County SupervisorLindsey Horvath, City CouncilmemberEunisses Hernandez, State SenatorScott Wiener, and the Sisters called for the group to be reinvited, and the LGBT Center and LA Pride backed out of Pride Night. The nearbyLos Angeles Angels even promised to invite the group to their Pride Night instead. However, the Dodgers reversed their decision on May 22, 2023, and announced the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence were once again welcome at the event.[92] The group accepted the team's apology.[93]
Following the decision to reinvite the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence, the Catholic League called for a boycott of the Dodgers' Pride Night. The Catholic League took out 50 radio ads on KABC[94] and contacted many prominent stakeholders in Los Angeles. These efforts purportedly helped contribute to a dip in attendance for the game against the San Francisco Giants.[95][96]
In 1997,David Carlin ofCommonweal criticized Donohue and the Catholic League for being overly sensitive in the identification of anti-Catholicism.[97] In 1999, the Jesuit priestJames Martin, the associate editor of the Catholic magazineAmerica wrote "Often their criticism is right on target, but frequently they speak without seeing or experiencing what they are critiquing, and that undercuts their credibility. Unfortunately, that type of response gives people the idea that the Catholic Church is unreflective."[12]Andrew Ferguson argued that Donohue was doing the cause of anti-Catholicism a service by his overly aggressive tactics, arguing, "The Catholic League president is doing more to discredit the Catholic church than perhaps anyone else.".[98]
Donohue responded to Ferguson in his book,The Truth about Clergy Sexual Abuse: Clarifying the Facts and the Causes. He criticized Ferguson for citing the Pennsylvania grand jury report of 2018 as though it was authoritative.
In fact, none of what is in a grand-jury report should be assumed to be factual.
Former Harvard Law professorAlan Dershowitz knows better:
“The grand jury has a specific function. It’s supposed to only indict or not indict. Indeed, prosecutors generally don’t issue reports for that reason because they only hear one side of the case. They don’t hear the other side. There’s no cross examination of witnesses. That’s why it is regarded as wrong for prosecutors to issue reports.”
It is precisely because grand-jury reports are not factual that the Catholic League filed an amicus brief challenging the right of the Pennsylvania grand-jury report to make public the names of eleven priests who claimed that doing so would violate their reputational rights as guaranteed by the state constitution. On December 3, 2018, our case, handled by Pittsburgh lawyers from Jones Day, won: the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled 6-1 in our favor. In November 2019, a Pennsylvania Supreme Court task force, which had been empaneled two years earlier, vindicated our effort: it recommended abolishing grand-jury reports.[99]
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)The truth is, being a firebrand of any political persuasion does not warrant rape and death threats.
