Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Catalogue of Women

This is a good article. Click here for more information.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ancient Greek epic poem

Papyrus
Apapyrus fragment containing the beginning of the Atlantid Electra's family from book 3 or 4 (Cat. fr. 177 =P.Oxy. XI 1359 fr. 2, second century CE,Oxyrhynchus)

TheCatalogue of Women (Ancient Greek:Γυναικῶν Κατάλογος,romanizedGunaikôn Katálogos)—also known as theEhoiai (Ancient Greek:Ἠοῖαι,romanizedĒoîai,Ancient:[ɛː.ôi̯.ai̯])[a]—is afragmentaryGreekepic poem that was attributed toHesiod during antiquity. The "women" of the title were in factheroines, many of whom lay with gods, bearing the heroes ofGreek mythology to both divine and mortal paramours. In contrast with the focus uponnarrative in theHomericIliad andOdyssey, theCatalogue was structured around a vast system ofgenealogies stemming from these unions and, inM. L. West's appraisal, covered "the whole of the heroic age."[1] Through the course of the poem's five books, these family trees were embellished with stories involving many of their members, and so the poem amounted to a compendium of heroic mythology in much the same way that the HesiodicTheogony presents a systematic account of theGreek pantheon built upon divine genealogies.

Most scholars do not currently believe that theCatalogue should be considered the work of Hesiod, but questions about the poem's authenticity have not lessened its interest for the study of literary, social and historical topics. As a Hesiodic work that treats in depth the Homeric world of the heroes, theCatalogue offers a transition between the divine sphere of theTheogony and the terrestrial focus of theWorks and Days by virtue of its subjects' status asdemigods. Given the poem's concentration upon heroines in addition to heroes, it provides evidence for the roles and perceptions of women in Greek literature and society during the period of its composition and popularity. Greek aristocratic communities, the ruling elite, traced their lineages back to the heroes of epic poetry; thus theCatalogue, a veritable "map of the Hellenic world in genealogical terms," preserves much information about a complex system of kinship associations and hierarchies that continued to have political importance long after theArchaic period.[2] Many of the myths in theCatalogue are otherwise unattested, either entirely so or in the form narrated therein, and held a special fascination for poets and scholars from the late Archaic period through theHellenistic andRoman eras.

Despite its popularity among theHellenistic literati and reading public ofRoman Egypt, the poem went out of circulation before it could pass into a medieval manuscript tradition and is preserved today bypapyrus fragments and quotations in ancient authors. Still, theCatalogue is much better attested than most "lost" works, with some 1,300 whole or partial lines surviving: "between a third and a quarter of the original poem", by one estimate.[3] The evidence for the poem's reconstruction—not only elements of its content, but the distribution of that content within theCatalogue—is indeed extensive, but the fragmentary nature of thisevidence leaves many unresolved complexities and has over the course of the past century led to several scholarly missteps.

Title and theē' hoiē-formula

[edit]

Ancient authors most commonly referred to the poem as theCatalogue of Women, or simply theCatalogue, but several alternate titles were also employed.[4] The tenth-century encyclopedia known as theSuda gives an expanded version, theCatalogue of Heroic Women (Γυναικῶν Ἡρωϊνῶν Κατάλογος), and another late source, the twelfth-century Byzantine poet and grammarianTzetzes, prefers to call the poem theHeroic Genealogy (Ἡρωϊκὴ Γενεαλογία).[5] But the earliest and most popular alternative title wasEhoiai (Ἠοῖαι), after thefeminineformulaē' hoiē (ἠ' οἵη,Ancient:[ɛːhǒi̯.ɛː]), "or such as", which introduces new sections within the poem via the introduction of a heroine or heroines.[6] This nickname also provided the standard title for a similar Hesiodic work, theMegalai Ehoiai orGreat Ehoiai (Μεγάλαι Ἠοῖαι).[7]

As is reflected by its use as an alternate title, theē' hoiē-formula was one of the poem's most recognizable features. It may have belonged originally to a genre of poetry that simply listed notable heroines,[8] but in theCatalogue the formula is used as a structuring tool that allows the poet to resume a broken branch of a family tree, or to jump horizontally across genealogies to a new figure and line of descent.[9] A characteristic example is found in the introduction of the daughters ofPorthaon atCat.fr. 26.5–9:[b]

Or such as (e' hoiai) the maidens sired by Porthaon,
three, like goddesses, skilled in all-beautiful works,
whomLaothoe the blameless Hyperian queen once
bore, entering Porthaon's blooming bed:
Eurythemiste andStratonice andSterope.
ἠ' οἷαι [κο]ῦραι Πορθάονος ἐξεγέν[οντο[c]
τρε[ῖς, ο]ἷαί τε θεαί, περικαλλέα [ἔργ' εἰδυῖα]ι·
τ[ά]ς ποτε [Λ]αο[θό]η κρείουσ' Ὑπερηῒς ἀ[μύ]μων
γεί]νατο Παρθᾶνος [θ]α[λ]ερὸν λέχ[ος] ε[ἰσ]αναβᾶσα,
Εὐρ]υθεμίστην τε Στρατ[ο]νίκην [τ]ε Στ[ε]ρόπην τε.

The preceding section of the poem had dealt at some length with the extended family of Porthaon's sisterDemodice, tracing her line down to the generation following the Trojan War. Hereē' hoiai (plural) is used to jump backwards in order to complete the account of the descendants of Porthaon and Demodice's fatherAgenor by covering the son's family. Elsewhere the formula is used in transitions to more distant branches. TheEhoie of Mestra, for example, ultimately serves to reintroduce the family ofSisyphus, Mestra's great-granduncle who hoped to win her as bride for his sonGlaucus. Although that marriage does not take place, the descendants of Sisyphus are soon presented.[10]

Content

[edit]

According to theSuda, theCatalogue was five books long.[11] The length of each is unknown, but it is likely that the entire poem consisted of anywhere from 4000 to over 5000 lines.[12] The majority of the content was structured around major genealogical units: the descendants ofAeolus were found in book 1 and at least part of book 2, followed by those ofInachus,Pelasgus,Atlas andPelops in the later books.[13] It is believed that a rough guide to this structure can be found in theBibliotheca, a Roman-era mythological handbook transmitted under the name ofApollodorus of Athens which used theCatalogue as a primary source for many genealogical details and appears to have followed the poem's overall arrangement.[14]

Book 1

[edit]

The first is by far the best-attested book of the poem, with several extensive papyri overlapping ancient quotations or coinciding with paraphrases: at least 420 verses ofdactylic hexameter survive in part or entire. One papyrus includesline numbers which, taken together with the system of overlaps among the other sources, allows much of the book's content to be assigned approximate line numbers.[15] Perhaps the most significant of these overlaps is between the papyrus containing the opening lines of the poem and theTheogony: theCatalogue was styled as a continuation of the "canonical" Hesiodic poem, with the final two verses of theTheogony standing asCatalogue of Women book 1, lines 1–2.[16] Toward the end of theTheogony as transmitted by the manuscript tradition, following Zeus's final ordering of Olympus and his siring several key deities, the poet invokes theMuses to sing of the "tribe of goddesses … immortals who slept with mortal men, bearing children like gods."[17] After some 150 verses on this topic, theproem to theCatalogue comes in the form of another re-invocation of the Muses to introduce a new, only slightly more terrestrial topic (Cat. fr. 1.1–5):

Now do sing of the tribe of women, sweet-voiced
Olympian Muses, daughters ofaegis-bearing Zeus,
they who were the best in those days [ …
and loosed their girdles [ …
mingling with the gods [ …
Νῦν δὲ γυναικῶν ⌊φῦλον ἀείσατε, ἡδυέπειαι[c]
Μοῦσαι Ὀλυμπιάδε⌊ς, κοῦραι Διὸς αἰγιόχοιο
αἳ τότ' ἄρισται ἔσαν [
μίτρας τ' ἀλλύσαντο   ̣[
μισγόμεναι θεοῖσ[ιν

The immediately subsequent lines describe significant characteristics of the heroic age. The first allowed for the liaisons that are the poem's ostensible subject: gods and mortals freely interacted in those days.[18] A further significant detail about the heroic condition is offered next in one of the most puzzling passages of theCatalogue. Men and women are said to have been not "equally long-lived" (ἰσαίωνες,isaiōnes, ahapax legomenon), but it is unclear whether this refers to different lifespans among the heroes themselves, a difference between the lives of the heroes and "today's" man, or between the lifespans of the heroes and the gods.[19] The differing fates of the heroes are then described: some appear to have lived a long life characterized by perpetual youth, while others were apparently condemned to an early death by the gods.[20] The papyrus is damaged at this point, and the full implications of these comparisons are unknown. The Muses are next addressed again, asked to sing of "however many [Zeus] lay with, siring the race of glorious kings … and Poseidon [lay with] … Ares … Hermes … [Heph]aestus … Heracles"; here the papyrus ends.[21]

First families

[edit]

The repeated use of the introductory phrase "or such as …" implies an initial "such as …", and it is likely that this first woman treated wasPyrrha, wife ofDeucalion.[22] There is some debate about whether theCatalogue included an account of theFlood myth,[23] but the creation of a race ofhumans born from stones cast by Deucalion and Pyrrha does appear to have figured in the poem.[24] Zeus unsurprisingly had first pick from the catalogue of women, and siredHellen by Pyrrha.[25] Pyrrha also had three daughters by Deucalion:Thyia,Protogeneia andPandora, who was named for her maternal grandmother, the famousPandora.[26] Like their mother, these three lay with Zeus, bearing sons from whom several early Greek tribes were said to descend. Thyia boreMagnes andMacedon; Protogeneia boreAethlius, the grandfather ofAetolus; and Pandora's son wasGraecus.[27]

But it was the family of Hellen, who would himself ultimately be theeponym for the entire Greek world, that had the greatest mythological significance. He siredDorus,Xuthus andAeolus, apparently by Othryis, thenymph ofMount Othrys.[28] Dorus was the eponym of theDorians, and his sonAegimius' sons,Dymas andPamphylus, gave their names to two of the three Dorian tribes, the Dymanes and Pamphyli.[29] The third division was called the Hylleis, after Heracles' sonHyllus, with whom Pamphylus and Dymas migrated to thePeloponnese.[30] Xuthus marriedErechtheus' daughterCreusa and was the father ofIon andAchaeus, along with a daughter named Diomede.[31] The relation between the progenitors of Greek tribes among the descendants of Deucalion is outlined in the following table:

DeucalionPyrrhaZeus[32]
(stones)
Hellen
(hellenes)
ThyiaPandoraProtogeneialeleges
Dorus
(dorians)
XuthusAeolus
(aeolians)
Magnes
(magnetes)
Macedon
(macedones)
Graecus
(graeci)
Aethlius
AegimiusAchaeus
(achaeans)
Ion
(ionians)
Endymion
Dymas
(dymanes)
Pamphylus
(pamphyli)
Aetolus
(aetolians)
The genealogical relation between Greek tribes within the family of Deucalion in theCatalogue[33]

Aeolids

[edit]

What was likely the largest unified stemma to be treated, the account of the descendants of Aeolus andAenarete's five daughters and seven sons, stretched from before the 200th line of book 1 well into the second book.[34] The sons who were certainly found in theCatalogue areCretheus,Athamas,Sisyphus,Salmoneus,Deion (or Deioneus) andPerieres.[35] A seventh son's name is obscured inlacuna: he has been identified tentatively asMinyas,Locrus or a second Magnes, not the eponym of the Magnetes, but the father ofDictys andPolydectes of theDanaë-Perseus myth.[36] No similar doubt attends the identities of Aeolus' daughters: they werePeisidice,Alcyone,Calyce,Canace andPerimede.[37] The families of the daughters were treated first, and much of the middle of book 1—over 400 lines—was devoted to recounting their descendants. Aeolus' extended family, via both sons and daughters, is notable for a concentration of fantastical narratives and folk elements of a sort largely absent from the Homeric poems, beginning with the doomed, hubristic love ofCeyx and Alcyone, who called one another "Zeus" and "Hera" and were turned into the kingfisher and halcyon as punishment (frr. 10a.83–98, 10d OCT, 15).

After treating theThessalian families of Peisidice and Canace, the poet turned to the intermingledAetolian-Elian lines of Calyce and Perimede. Perimede had earlier in the book borne two sons to the riverAchelous, one of whom was the grandfather ofOeneus,Hippodamas.[38] ToAethlius Calyce boreEndymion, whose sonAetolus was the eponym of Aetolia and the great-grandfather ofDemodice andPorthaon, through whom the later Aetolian and Elian genealogies were traced. Somewhere within these families,Eurytus and Cteatus were found in a form more fearsome than they were in theIliad: in theCatalogue they were fierceconjoined twins with two heads, four arms and an equal number of legs.[39] Most significant for the epic tradition, however, was the marriage of Demodice's sonThestius and Porthaon's daughter Eurythemiste which produced the daughtersLeda,Althaea andHypermestra, who are introduced in a group Ehoiai at fr. 23a.3–5.

Painting
Louis Billotey'sIphigénie (1935) depicting Iphigenia (center) in embrace with Clytemnestra, with Artemis gazing at the girl. InEuripides'Iphigeneia in Aulis, Iphigeneia was turned into a deer to save her from being sacrificed so that the Achaean fleet could sail for Troy. In theCatalogue, the goddess saved Iphigenia (called Iphimede) and enfranchised her as "Artemis Enodia", orHecate.[40]

Leda's marriage toTyndareus is followed by the births ofClytemnestra,Timandra andPhylonoe, the last of whomArtemis made immortal.[41] Clytemnestra andAgamemnon had two daughters,Electra and Iphimede, the name used in the poem for the woman later and more famously known asIphigenia.[42] It had been prophesied that she must be sacrificed to Artemis before the Greek fleet could sail for Troy, but in theCatalogue version of events the goddess replaced her with aneidolon and immortalized Iphimede as "Artemis Enodia", orHecate.[43] NextOrestes' birth andmatricide are reported, the earliest extant account of his killing Clytemnestra, as the planned sacrifice of Iphimede/Iphigenia is first found in theCatalogue.[44] Timandra's marriage toEchemus follows, followed in turn by Leda's bearing theDioscuri to Zeus in several damaged lines. It is unknown if Helen's birth was reported here, for the testimonia leave her parentage uncertain. Althaea lies withAres and bearsMeleager, whose heroic qualities are described along with his death at the hands ofApollo during the conflict with theCuretes that was the sequel to theHunt for the Calydonian Boar.[45] Among Althaea's children by Oeneus,Deianeira is singled out for her role in the death andapotheosis ofHeracles.[46] The poet next turns his attention to the Porthaonids (seeabove) and closes out his account of the female Aeolids with theSirens, daughters of Sterope and Achelous.[47]

The Ehoie of Salmoneus' daughterTyro provides the transition to the families of the male Aeolids.[48] As king ofElis, Salmoneus forced his subjects to worship him as Zeus and simulated the god's thunder and lightning by dragging bronze cauldrons from his chariot and throwing torches through the air.[49] The real Zeus destroyed king and subjects alike, but spared Tyro and conducted her to the house of her uncle Cretheus in Thessaly because she wrangled with her impious father.[50] There she became enamored of the riverEnipeus, but Poseidon had his own designs upon Tyro and in the guise of the river lay with her, siringNeleus andPelias.[51] The brothers did not get along, and Zeus gave them different realms to rule: Pelias received as his lotIolcos; to Neleus fellPylos in the westernPeloponnese.[52] The house of Neleus now takes center-stage. Heracles sacked Pylos, killing all the male Neleids, saveNestor who was off in Gerenia, anotherMessenian city.[53]Periclymenus, a son of Neleus to whom Poseidon had granted the ability to change shape, was Pylos' only bulwark against the onslaught of Heracles, and theCatalogue-poet granted him a briefaristeia which ended whenAthena pointed out that the bee on Heracles' chariot was actually the Pylian defender.[54] Following the account of Nestor's marriage and family, the contest for Neleus' daughterPero was narrated.[55] The father would give her hand to whoever could rustle the cattle ofIphicles fromPhylace, a feat accomplished byBias with the help of his brotherMelampus.[56] The poet then turned to the family of Pelias as the last assignable papyrus fragment from book 1 breaks off. It is likely that Tyro's children by Cretheus—Aeson,Pheres andAmythaon—followed,[57] and there might have been room in the book to at least start the family of Cretheus' brother Athamas.[58]

Athamas ruled inBoeotia and had a complicated family life, several details of which are known to have played part in theCatalogue. His first children werePhrixus andHelle, whose mother wasNephele.[59] In what was the first episode of theArgonautic saga, she gave her children a ram with agolden fleece upon which they fled the intrigues of their stepmotherIno according to other sources.[60] Athamas was driven mad by the gods, perhaps because he took the youngDionysus into his household, and slaughtered his and Ino's sonLearchus; Ino herself jumped into the sea with their sonMelicertes and became the sea-goddess Leucothea.[61] At some point before his marriage to Ino, Athamas had siredLeucon andSchoeneus byThemisto, and Leucon's daughters Peisidice, Euippe and Hyperippe were given extended group treatment in theCatalogue.[62]

Book 2

[edit]

It is uncertain at what point among the extant fragments the division between books 1 and 2 fell, but at least some of the Aeolid families were covered in the second book.[63] The families of Perieres, Deion and Sisyphus (in that order) were most likely found in the 2nd book because there does not appear to be enough room left in book 1 to accommodate them as a group after the children of Neleus and Pelias.[64] It was once thought that the Ehoie ofAtalanta opened the book, but recently published evidence casts doubt upon this view (seeBook 3, below).

Perieres' family was centered aroundMessene.[65] His sonLeucippus had several daughters, but Arsinoe was singled out for extensive treatment.[66] To Apollo she boreAsclepius, whom Zeus killed. In a rage Apollo killed theCyclopes, after which Zeus was about to hurl him intoTartarus whenLeto interceded and arranged for Apollo to serve as a laborer forAdmetus instead.[67] Directly following the Asclepius affair comes the Ehoie ofAsterodeia, the daughter ofDeion.[68] She boreCrisus andPanopeus toPhocus; the brothers did not get along, quarreling while still in the womb.[69] Another daughter of Deion,Philonis, borePhilammon to Apollo andAutolycus to Hermes.[70] Philammon siredThamyris;[71] Autolycus, the grandfather ofOdysseus, was a master thief who could change the appearance of his booty to avoid detection.[72] Autolycus' daughterPolymele, the mother ofJason, is apparently born directly preceding the Ehoie of Mestra, the daughter ofErysichthon.[73]

Engraving
Erysichthon sells his daughter Mestra. An engraving from amongJohann Wilhelm Baur's illustrations of Ovid'sMetamorphoses, which included a version the myth that differed from Mestra's story in theCatalogue.

Mestra's story is one of the best preserved and most studied sections of theCatalogue.[74] She had the ability to change her shape at will, a skill which her father Erysichthon exploited in service of a ravening hunger with which he had been cursed and for which reason the people had nicknamed him Aethon (Αἴθων,Aithon, "Blazing").[75] He would marry off Mestra for thebride prices she garnered, only to have the girl return home in some different form.[76] The most notable victim of this plot wasSisyphus, who, despite his characteristic cunning, could never retain custody of his would-be daughter-in-law.[77] Strife arose between Sisyphus and Erysichthon which no mortal could resolve, and the case was handed over to another authority.[78] The text is damaged at this point, and identity of the mediator is a matter of dispute, as is the nature of the verdict rendered.[79] Exactly how this judgement resolves the quarrel over Mestra is obscure,[d] but Sisyphus ultimately comes out on the losing end, for Mestra does not bear children to Glaucus.[80] Instead Poseidon whisks her off toKos, where she bearsEurypylus to the god.[81] Eurypylus' descendants rule the island, which is sacked by Heracles in a brief allusion to the great hero's adventures. On his way home from attacking Troy for the horses ofLaomedon, he assaulted Kos before going on to participate in thegigantomachy.[82]

The Ehoie of Mestra closes with her returning to Athens to care for her father,[83] but the poet's attention stays with Sisyphus, as he and his son are the male subjects of the Ehoie ofEurynome which immediately follows. She was wise and beautiful, having been taught womanly arts by Athena.[84] Sisyphus attempted to cheat her of her cattle, but Zeus intervened.[85] Although he did not get what he was after, Sisyphus did accomplish with Eurynome what he could not with Mestra: a marriage for Glaucus. The gods again got in the way, though, and she boreBellerophontes to Poseidon, who gave his son the winged horsePegasus with which Bellerophontes slew theChimera.[86] In theIliad this task was presented as the order of Proetus' father-in-lawIobates,[87] and in theCatalogue it appears to be followed immediately by the marriage of Bellerophontes and a daughter of the Lycian king.[88]

Inachids

[edit]

In theBibliotheca the descendants ofInachus followed Deucalion's,[89] and theCatalogue appears to have followed the same order, likely introducing the Inachids via the Ehoie ofNiobe, the river god's granddaughter.[90] To Zeus she boreArgus, the eponym ofArgos, who in turn sired Peiren, the father ofIo.[91] Zeus's affair with Io had a place in theCatalogue, for ancient authors cite the poem's version of this myth when quoting anaition for the fact that "all's far in love ...", at least:[92]

From then he made the oath unenforceable among humans
when it comes to clandestine deeds of Cypris.
ἐκ τοῦ δ' ὅρκον ἔθηκεν ἀποίνιμον ἀνθρώποισι
νοσφιδίων ἔργων πέρι Κύπριδος.

Zeus and Io's "clandestine deeds" produced a son,Epaphus, who was the father ofLibya.[93] The families of her two sonsAgenor andBelus were covered in depth: the former's line in book 3, the latter's following his birth. Belus had a daughter,Thronia, who bore Arabus (the eponym ofArabia) to Hermes;[94] Belus' sons wereAegyptus andDanaus.[95]

The myth of the mass-wedding of Aegyptus' fifty sons andDanaus' fifty daughters came at this point,[96] but little survives of the narrative in theCatalogue. Danaus and his daughters fled to Argos and introduced the practice of digging wells, "making waterless Argos well-watered Argos" (Ἄργος ἄνυδρον ἐὸν Δανααὶ θέσαν Ἄργος ἔνυδρον).[97] Aegyptus' sons followed the Danaids to Greece in order to compel them to marry,[96] and, as in the predominant version of the myth,Hypermestra alone consummated her union withLynceus and boreAbas, whose sons wereAcrisius andProetus.[98] The daughters of Proetus offended Hera or Dionysus or both in some way, and were cursed with leprosy or madness which could only be cured byMelampous, a service which Abas rewarded by granting the seer and his brother Bias shares of Argos to rule.[99] Acrisius' daughter wasDanaë. Her golden liaison with Zeus, the birth ofPerseus, and mother and son's involuntary exile in thelarnax are quickly recounted, and Perseus' siring ofAlcaeus,Sthenelus andElectryon byAndromeda also comes in quick succession.[100]

Book 3

[edit]

The division between books 2 and 3 presents a special problem for the reconstruction of theCatalogue.[101] Ascholion toTheocritus,Idyll 3.40 appears to attribute the story ofAtalanta to "Hesiod in book 3", a method of citation that almost certainly refers to the present poem.[102] One papyrus concludes with what appears to be the beginning of the first line of Atalanta's Ehoie followed by a forkedparagraphos and blank space, suggesting that it is areclamans;[103] another papyrus (pictured) clearly transmits the ends of the first few lines of her section preceded by blank space, giving the possibility that it was the beginning of a book.[104] These two fragments would combine to give:[105]

Or such as she, [much]-famed lord Sch[oeneus's]
[daughter, ... ] swift-footed noble Atalanta
[ ... ] with the gleam of theCharites
ἠ' οἵη Σχ[οινῆος ἀγακλε]ιτοῖο ἄνακτος[c]
  ̣  ̣  ̣  ̣  ̣   ̣  ̣  ̣  ̣  ̣   ̣  ̣  ̣  ̣  ̣]σι ποδώκης δῖ' Ἀταλάν[τη
  ̣  ̣  ̣  ̣  ̣  ̣   ̣  ̣  ̣  ̣  ̣  ̣ Χαρί]των ἀμαρύγματ' ἔχο[υσα
Papyrus
The beginning of the Atalanta-Ehoie (Cat. fr. 73. 1–7 = P.Lit.Lond. 32, third century BC, Gurob)

The account that follows is one of the most extensive and exciting episodes of theCatalogue to survive from antiquity.[106] Atalanta wished to avoid marriage, but a throng of suitors gathered because of her beauty.[107] Her father Schoeneus promised her hand to the one who could beat his swift daughter in a footrace, with one further condition: any who accepted the challenge and lost would be put to death.[108] Aphrodite had given one of the contestants,Hippomenes, three golden apples with which to temp the girl off course; these he threw as he ran and begged Atalanta to have pity upon him.[109] The toss of the third apple finally accomplished its aim, but the couple did not live happily after: through the will of Zeus Atalanta was transformed into lion because she had seen "what it is not lawful to see," which presumably means that she had unlawfully entered a holy precinct.[110] This is where the evidence for Atalanta leaves off, and it remains unknown just where and how the passage fit in theCatalogue.It is possible that the attribution to book three was simply incorrect, and Atalante's Ehoie came within the family of Athamas in books one or two. Another possibility is that she was introduced in the context of her mother's family.[111] Her identity in theCatalogue is unknown, but this hypothesis could allow for Atalanta to appear within the Inachid stemma, following the Danae-Ehoie within the extended family of Belus.[112]

Agenorids

[edit]

In theCatalogue and later mythographic tradition, the family ofBelus' brotherAgenor was something "like a repository for aliens and displaced persons."[113] His sonPhoenix was the eponym ofPhoenicia, and ifCepheus andCadmus were also his sons, theAgenorids would have been present inAethiopia andThebes as well.[114] By oneAlphesiboea Phoenix siredAdonis.[115]Cassiepeia bore to himPhineus; she was perhaps also the mother of Phoenix's daughterEuropa, but the girl's mother might have beenTelephaassa, as inMoschus'Europa.[116]

Papyrus
Part of theGês Períodos (Cat. fr. 150 = P.Oxy. XI 1358 fr. 2 col. i, second century CE, Oxyrhynchus)

Europa's tale, well known in later classical literature and beyond, appears in a largely familiar form in theCatalogue. She caught Zeus's eye while she and some friends were gathering flowers in a meadow.[117] The god transformed into a bull with breath smelling of saffron, in the guise of which he abducted Europa, carrying her upon his back toCrete.[118] There she boreMinos,Rhadamanthys andSarpedon to Zeus, and he gave her a necklace made by Hephaestus that would figure in Theban saga as theNecklace of Harmonia.[119] Sarpedon ruledLycia, and was apparently granted a lifespan equal to three generations of men by Zeus.[120] His death at Troy and the rain of blood it inspired Zeus to send is briefly described.[121] Minos ruled Crete, succeeding his stepfatherAsterion.[117] Poseidon sent up from the sea a bull which had sex with Minos' wifePasiphae, siring theMinotaur.[122] To Minos she also boreDeucalion,Catreus,Androgeos and Eurygyes, though it is equally possible that these last two names referred to a single son.[123] At least one daughter,Ariadne, was surely present, for the myth of Androgeos–Eurygyes' death in Athens and the subsequent sacrifice of Athenian youths to the Minotaur will presuppose Theseus' expedition to Crete and Ariadne's complicity in slaying the beast.[124]

Phineus was even better-traveled than his sister Europa, and his biography in theCatalogue was apparently a "pièce de résistance" meant to conclude the geographically diverse Inachid stemma with an appropriate flourish.[124] He ruled inThrace, but was kidnapped by theHarpies.[125] Zetes and Calais, theBoreads, pursued the tormentors and tormented to the ends of the earth.[126] The poet catalogued many far-flung and remarkable races encountered during the chase, including: the Katoudaioi ("Subterranean Men"),Pygmies, Melanes ("Black Men"),Aethiopians,Libyans, "horse-milking"Scythians, Hemikynes ("Half-Dogs") and theMakrokephaloi, as well asgriffins.[127]Ephorus called the episode theGês Períodos (Γῆς Περίοδος, "Journey Around the World"), and it was once thought that this title referred to an independent work, one erroneously attributed to Hesiod.[128] This view was disproved conclusively in 1911 with the publication of an extensive papyrus fragment (pictured) of the episode which derived from the same bookroll that contained the myth of Europa described above.

Arcadia

[edit]

It is likely that the section describing theArcadian descendants ofPelasgus andArcas followed that of the Inachids.[129] Pelasgus wasautochthonous; he siredLycaon either by theOceanid Meliboea or byCyllene, theoread of anArcadian mountain which still bears her name.[130] Lycaon's fifty impious sons drew the ire of Zeus and were all destroyed, saveNyctimus.[131] The majority of the subsequently covered Arcadian figures descend from Arcas, who was the son of Zeus andCallisto, a localnymph.[132] A familiar version of her catasterism is attributed to "Hesiod" byPseudo-Eratosthenes, but the Hesiodic work intended in this citation might have been theAstronomia.[133] Arcas had at least two sons:Elatus andApheidas.[134] Elatus siredAepytus, the father of Tlesenor and Peirithous; Apheidas was the father of Stheneboea, the wife of Proetus, andAleus.[134] Aleus' daughterAuge was for some reason entrusted to the care ofTeuthras inMysia, where she lay with Heracles and boreTelephus.[135] Telephus was on the Mysian throne when the Greek expedition to Troy accidentally landed there and found themselves fighting fellow "Achaeans."[136]

Atlantids

[edit]

In theBibliotheca, the Arcadian genealogies are immediately followed by the Atlantids, and this progression is known to mirror the structure of theCatalogue because other fragments of the papyrus roll that transmits the Telephus myth cover families ofAtlas' daughters:Taygete,Electra,Alcyone,Sterope,Celaeno,Maia andMerope. Maia bore Hermes to Zeus on Mount Cyllene.[137] Taygete also slept with Zeus, becoming the mother ofLacedaemon, through whom much of the Spartan line was traced, includingTyndareos, the father ofHelen, andPenelope, the wife ofOdysseus.[138] To Zeus yet again Electra boreDardanus, the progenitor of the Trojan line, andEetion, who was killed for sleeping withDemeter.[139] Dardanus' sons wereErichthonius andIlus.[140]Hyrieus and Hyperes were Poseidon's children by Alcyone. Her section included the Ehoie of Hyrieus' daughterAntiope, who boreAmphion and Zethus to Zeus.[141] Hyperes' daughter Arethusa slept with Poseidon and was changed to a spring inEuboea, but not before bearingAbas, the eponym of theAbantes.[142] His line is traced down toElephenor, leader of the Abantes in the Trojan War.[143] Sterope lay with Ares and boreOenomaus, but it is possible that this union was delayed to book four as part of the section treating the family ofPelops and Oenomaus' daughterHippodameia.[144]

Book 4

[edit]

Before the papyri began to accrue, the longest extant passage of theCatalogue was known from theShield of Heracles, the first 56 lines of which were borrowed from book 4 according to an ancient hypothesis to theShield.[145] This passage, the Ehoie ofAlcmene, recounts how she went to Thebes with her husbandAmphitryon, who could not consummate the marriage until he had avenged the deaths of her brothers at the hands of theTaphians andTeleboans.[146] As Amphitryon returned having accomplished this feat, Zeus lay with Alcmene; upon his return that very night, so too did Amphitryon.[147] To the god Alcmene boreHeracles and to the hero she boreIphicles.[148]

Alcmene belongs to the Pelopid line—her motherLysidice was a daughter of Pelops and Hippodameia—, and the passages preceding her Ehoie also concern Pelopids. Three of Pelops' daughters married sons of Perseus: Lysidice marriedElectryon,Nicippe wedSthenelus, andAstydameia wedAlcaeus.[149] Nicippe and Sthenelus' daughterAstymedusa marriedOedipus, and at the funeral games in his honor his sonPolynices caught the eye of his future wifeArgeia, the daughter ofAdrastus.[150] Pelops' sonAtreus was the father ofPleisthenes who, contrary to the better known genealogy, was the father ofAgamemnon andMenelaus.[151] Their mother wasAerope, the daughter ofCatreus, and their births were reported in the verses directly preceding the Ehoie of Alcmene.[152]

Besides the Pelopid line, and whatever remained of the Atlantid stemmata among which it ultimately belongs, little is known for certain about the further content of book 4.[153] It is possible that an Athenian section including the various autochthonous kings of Athens and the daughters ofCecrops was found here.[154] A family springing from the riverAsopus has also been proposed for this region based on the presence of "several persons or families that other sources represent as descended from daughters of Asopos."[155] The most notable family that would belong to this section is that of Asopus' daughterAegina, the nymph of theisland that bears her name who slept with Zeus and boreAeacus.[156] Fearing that Aeacus would be lonely on his island, Zeus changed all of Aegina's ants into men, spawning the tribe ofMyrmidons, a play upon their name and the Greek word for "ant",μύρμηξ,mýrmēx.[156] This is the family to whichAchilles belongs, the most notable hero in the Trojan saga, as well as his fatherPeleus and unclesTelamon andMenoetius.[157]

Book 5

[edit]
Papyrus
Portions of the Catalogue of Suitors (Cat. frr. 199–200 =P.Berol. inv. 9739 col. iv–v, second century AD)

The final book was different in that it apparently left behind the genealogical structure of the first four books. Book five opened with a nearly 200-line catalogue of the suitors ofHelen, similar in style to theCatalogue of Ships inIliad book 2.[158] Although it is likely that the entire catalogue included twenty-five to thirty suitors,[159] only twelve are attested by name. From ArgosAmphilochus andAlcmaeon, the sons ofAmphiaraus, attempted to win Helen, but were perhaps never able to join in the contest because of their punishment for the matricide ofEriphyle.[160] Ever shrewd,Odysseus did not give gifts but simply sent envoys to Castor and Polydeuces, because he knew that Menelaus would ultimately prevail.[161]Thoas was not so wise and gave many sheep and cows in the hope of winning Helen.[162] FromPhylace, many gifts were given byPodarces andProtesilaus, who were cousins in theCatalogue, not brothers as in the Catalogue of Ships.[163] AthenianMenestheus gave many gold cauldrons and tripods, confident that he was the wealthiest of all the heroes.[164]Ajax wooed Helen fromSalamis, promising to pillage the surrounding lands and give their possession as part of his gift.[165]Idomeneus made the long journey fromCrete himself, aware of Helen's beauty only from secondhand accounts.[166]

Before giving his decision, Tyndareus bound all the suitors to his fateful oath: should anyone ever take his daughter by force, all those who had wooed her must exact vengeance upon her abductor. To this all the suitors readily agreed, each believing that he would be given Helen's hand.[167] At this point the Catalogue of Suitors has come to a close, but even as Menelaus' success is reported, the poet introducesAchilles because of his status as the greatest hero of the Trojan saga and his central role in Zeus's plan to bring the Heroic Age to a close.[168] With the aid of Agamemnon, Menelaus had given the most bride prices, but were Achilles already of age, he would surely have won Helen's hand, "for neither warlike Menelaus nor any other human on earth would have defeated him".[169] But Achilles was not present, and Menelaus won Helen, who boreHermione to him.[170]

The end of the Heroic Age

[edit]

The marriage of Helen and Menelaus precipitates the Trojan War, the event that ultimately brings the heroic age to an end, but the circumstances surrounding this transition in theCatalogue are unclear. Directly following the birth of Hermione strife arises among the gods, and Zeus hatches a plan to stir up trouble among mankind.[171] The exact meaning of this plan is obscure because of deficiencies in the text, and several interpretations have been proposed, the most commonly accepted being that Zeus plans to destroy a great number of men by causing the war, ultimately removing the heroes to a life lived in conditions resembling the Golden Age.[172] Another possibility is that Zeus intends to destroy the race of heroes and return the world to its former order, when gods slept with each other, not mortals.[173] In any event, a great change is coming, and as the final placed fragment of theCatalogue breaks off, several enigmatic scenes are sketched. A great storm arises which dwindles the strength of mankind:[174]

From the lofty trees falling groundward were many
beautiful leaves shed; earthward the fruit would fall
as Boreas blew furiously by Zeus's decree.
The sea would swell, and everything trembled at this,
mortal strength would wither, the fruit would dwindle,
in the spring season, when in the hills the hairless one bears
three children in the third year within its nook of the earth.
πο⌋λλὰ δ' ἀπὸ γλωθρῶν δενδρέων ἀμύοντα χαμᾶζε
χεύετο καλὰ πέτηλα, ῥέεσκε δὲ καρπὸς ἔραζε
π]νείοντοϲ Βορέαο περιζαμενὲϲ Διὸς αἴσηι,
ο]ἴδεσκεν δὲ θάλασσα, τρόμεσκε δὲ πάντ' ἀπὸ τοῖο,
τρύχεσκεν δὲ μένος βρότεον, μινύθεσκε δὲ καρπός,
ὥρηι ἐν εἰαρινῆι, ὅτε τ' ἄτριχος οὔρεσι τίκτει
γ]αί[η]ς ἐν κευθμῶνι τρίτωι ἔτεϊ τρία τέκνα.

These lines, described by West as "the finest passage of poetry yet known from theCatalogue",[175] might parallelCalchas' prophecy inIliad 2, which presages the first nine fruitless years of the Trojan War via the image of a snake devouring nine sparrows.[176] Here the "hairless one," a kenning for a snake, gives birth to what appears to be the first of three sets of triplets, and as the remains of the papyrus become more meager, the snake sloughs its skin, representing the regeneration that will come once the heroic age comes to an end and the world is given over to mortals.[177]

Notable unplaced and disputed fragments

[edit]

Many fragments that are securely attributed to theCatalogue, some of which are relatively substantial, cannot be placed within the poem because their content is either too obscure or could be assigned to different individuals or genealogies which are themselves difficult to locate within the five books.[178]

Cyrene

[edit]

The place ofCyrene within the poem has implications beyond the level of content, for if her narrative is to be connected to the city ofCyrene in Libya, theterminus post quem for the composition of theCatalogue would be 631 BC, the approximate year of that city's foundation.[179] Pindar,Pythian 9 tells how Apollo saw Cyrene hunting in her nativeThessaly and was immediately enamored of thetomboy. The god goes to the cave of the wisecentaur Chiron and asks who she is and whether it would be wise to consort with her. Chiron then prophesies that it is fated for Cyrene and Apollo to mate, and that he will bring her across the sea to Libya, where she will be queen of a portion of the land and bear to him a son,Aristaeus. Ascholium on the ode states that "Pindar took the story from an Ehoie of Hesiod's" (ἀπὸ δὲ ἨοίαςἩσιόδου τὴν ἱστορίαν ἔλαβεν ὁ Πίνδαρος) and relates the opening lines of the section (Cat. fr. 215):

Or such as she inPhthia, with beauty from theCharites,
she who dwelt by the water ofPeneus, Cyrene
ἠ' οἵη Φθίηι Χαρίτων ἄπο κάλλος ἔχουσα
Πηνειοῦ παρ' ὕδωρ καλὴ ναίεσκε Κυρήνη

Richard Janko, who believes that theCatalogue was composed c. 690, argues that the extent to which Pindar relied upon the Hesiodic text is unknown and that, even if Apollo did carry Cyrene to Libya, this does not presuppose an aetiology of the city.[180] Others have argued that the citation is also vague regarding just which Hesiodic poem included the Cyrene-Ehoie, theCatalogue or theMegalai Ehoiai: the latter might have included a narrative similar to Pindar's, with the former presenting a different version of the myth, if indeed theCatalogue treated Cyrene at all.[181] The complete removal of Cyrene would not, however, be easily accommodated by related evidence—it would presumably also involve transferring two fragments concerning Aristaeus which have traditionally been attributed to theCatalogue, and his sonActaeon certainly appeared in the poem.[182]

Actaeon

[edit]

The myth ofActaeon is known to have been narrated in theCatalogue by virtue of a paraphrase found in a fragmentary dictionary of metamorphoses.[183] According to the dictionary, theCatalogue included a variant of the myth in which Actaeon was changed into a stag by Artemis and then killed by his own hounds because he attempted to takeSemele as his wife, thus angering Zeus, who had designs upon the woman.[184] Before this testimonium appeared, another papyrus containing 21 hexameters related to the Actaeon myth was published byEdgar Lobel, who tentatively attributed the text to theCatalogue.[185] As the fragment opens, Actaeon has already been torn apart by his dogs, and a goddess—Athena or, less likely, Artemis[e]—arrives atChiron's cave. She prophesies to the centaur that Dionysus will be born to Semele and that Actaeon's dogs will roam the hills with him until his apotheosis, after which they will return to stay with Chiron. At this point the papyrus is damaged, but it is clear that the dogs are delivered from a "madness" (λύσσα,lussa, line 15) and begin to mourn their master as the goddess returns to Olympus. Merkelbach and West did not include this papyrus in their edition of the fragment, the latter calling it an "incoherent epic pastiche" which would cause the author of theCatalogue to "turn in his grave if he knew that it had been attributed to him."[186] According toGlenn Most, some scholars believe that the text is Hellenistic,[187] but it is demonstrably archaic, and at least a few classicists today consider it to be part of theCatalogue.[188][f]

Date, composition and authorship

[edit]

During antiquity theCatalogue was almost universally considered the work of Hesiod.[189]Pausanias reports, however, that theBoeotians living aroundMount Helicon during his day believed that the only genuine Hesiodic poem was theWorks and Days and that even the first 10 lines of that poem (the so-called "hymn to Zeus") were spurious.[190] The only other surviving expression of doubt is found inAelian, who cites "Hesiod" for the number ofNiobe's children, but qualifies his citation with "unless these verses are not by Hesiod, but have been passed off falsely as his, like many other passages."[191] But Aelian's skepticism could have stemmed from the belief, still common today, that Hesiodic poetry was especially susceptible tointerpolation,[192] and it is impossible to tell whether he regarded the entireCatalogue as spurious or not.[g] These two passages are, in any event, isolated, and more discerning critics likeApollonius of Rhodes,Aristophanes of Byzantium andCrates of Mallus apparently found no reason to doubt the attribution to Hesiod, going so far as to cite theCatalogue in arguments concerning the content and authenticity of other Hesiodic poems.[193]

Sculpture bust
ARoman-era sculpture possibly representing Hesiod, believed by ancient readers to be the author of theCatalogue of Women

Modern scholars have not shared the confidence of their Hellenistic counterparts, and today theCatalogue is generally considered to be a post-Hesiodic composition. Since Hesiod is supposed to have lived around the turn of the seventh century BCE, theCyrene-Ehoie alone could guarantee that the poem was not his.[194]Richard Janko's survey of epic language, on the other hand, suggests that theCatalogue is very early, nearly contemporary with Hesiod'sTheogony,[195] and Janko sees no reason why theCatalogue "should not be by the same poet as theTheogony," who "calls himself Hesiod."[196] But a different critical strain, one which views the transmitted Homeric and Hesiodic poems as ultimate products ofrhapsodic recomposition within anoral tradition, would hold that from an initial Hesiodic nucleus theCatalogue arrived at its final form well after the period to which Hesiod has been assigned.[197] Such a scenario could account for perceivedanachronisms in the mythological content and in the linguistic character of the poem,[198] but would sidestep the issue of the relation between theCatalogue as it has been transmitted and the broader corpus of early Greek epic.[199]

M. L. West argues on poetic, linguistic, cultural and political grounds that an Athenian poet "compiled theCatalogue of Women and attached it to Hesiod'sTheogony, as if it were all Hesiodic," sometime between 580 and 520 BCE, and thinks it possible that this range might be narrowed to the period following 540.[200] He sees, for example, the marriage of Xuthus to a daughter of Erechtheus as a means of subordinating all of Ionia to Athens, since their union produced the eponym Ion.[201] Similarly,Sicyon is made a son of Erechtheus (fr. 224), which West takes as a reflection of the tyrantCleisthenes of Sicyon's attempts to promote Ionian–Athenian interests in the polis, which had traditionally been more closely connected toDorianArgos.[202] These and other considerations would, in West's view, establish aterminus post quem ofc. 575 BCE, but he prefers a later dating on the assumption thatTheogony 965–1020, which he assigns to the latter portion of the sixth century BCE,[203] was contemporaneous with the composition of theCatalogue.[204]

West's arguments have been highly influential,[205] but other scholars have arrived at different conclusions using the same evidence. Fowler thinks that the Sicyon genealogy would more likely reflect a composition before Cleisthenes' death (c. 575 BCE) and dates the poem to the period closely following theFirst Sacred War (595–585 BCE), connecting its content to the growing influence of theAmphictyonic League and placing its author inAeolianThessaly because of the Aeolid family-trees centered around that region which dominate the earlier portions of the poem.[206] Hirschberger, on the other hand, takes this focus upon the Aeolids and theCatalogue poet's perceived interest in eastern peoples to be indicative of a poet fromAeolis in Asia Minor; she proposes that theCatalogue was composed there between 630 and 590 BCE, viewing the composition of theShield of Heracles and an apparent allusion to the poem byStesichorus (died c. 555 BCE) as providing the ultimateterminus ante quem.[207]

Reception

[edit]

TheCatalogue's greatest influence was felt during theHellenistic period, when the poem was used as an extra-Homeric touchstone for the poets of the era who favored recondite and antiquarian references over direct engagement with the more prominent members of the canon.[208] The most famous Hellenistic allusion to theCatalogue is found inHermesianax'sLeontion, which included a catalogue of great literary figures and their loves, beginning withOrpheus and Agriope (more commonly known asEurydice) and proceeding down to the poet's contemporaries, including his teacherPhilitas of Cos. Many of the entries engage playfully with their subjects' work: Homer, for example, is portrayed as pining forPenelope. Directly preceding that lovestruck bard comes Hesiod's blurb:[209]

And I also say that, leaving behind his Boeotian home,
     Hesiod, the keeper of all inquiry,
went smitten to the Heliconian town of the Ascraeans.
     There he, wooing Ascraean Ehoie,
suffered much, and wrote all his books of knowledge
     in homage, beginning from his first girlfriend.
φημὶ δὲ καὶ Βοιωτὸν ἀποπρολιπόντα μέλαθρον
     Ἡσίοδον πάσης ἤρανον ἱστορίης
Ἀσκραίων ἐσικέσθαι ἐρῶνθ' Ἑλικωνίδα κώμην·
     ἔνθεν ὅ γ' Ἠοίην μνώμενος Ἀσκραϊκὴν
πόλλ' ἔπαθεν, πάσας δὲ λόγων ἀνεγράψατο βίβλους
     ὑμνῶν, ἐκ πρώτης παιδὸς ἀνερχόμενος.

Here theē' hoiē-formula is styled as the name of a woman, cleverly rendered "Anne Other" by Helen Asquith, and the grumpy Hesiod who reviled his home inAscra atWorks and Days 639–40 becomes a discomfited lover-boy in the village.[210]Phanocles, a near contemporary of Hermesianax, composed anelegiac catalogue of mythologicalpederastic relationships entitled theLoves orBeautiful Boys in which each story was introduced by the formulaē' hōs (ἠ' ὡς), "or like".[211]Nicaenetus of Samos, a later Hellenistic poet, wrote his ownCatalogue of Women and the otherwise unknown Sosicrates (or Sostratus) ofPhanagoria was said to have written anEhoioi (Ἠοῖοι), themasculine equivalent of "Ehoiai".[212] While allusions to the ehoie-formula and catalogue structure of the poem are most easily recognized, interaction with theCatalogue in Hellenistic poetry was not limited to plays upon these aspects: direct engagement with the myths found in theCatalogue were a popular way for the Alexandrians to show their Hesiodic affiliations.[213]

At Rome the poets of theLate Republic andAugustan age continued the Hellenistic period's allusive engagement with theCatalogue.Catullus, a poet who made plain his Callimachean affiliations, is the earliest Roman author who can be seen to engage with theCatalogue.[214] In hisepyllion on the wedding of Peleus and Thetis, Catullus alludes to thetheoxeny that the proem to theCatalogue presented as a defining characteristic of the heroic age and to theepithalamium of the couple that was sung in a later book.[215] In theAeneidVergil closes his catalogue of combatants with the swift female warriorCamilla, alluding to the Hesiodic account of Iphiclus' speed in "a remarkably subtle nod to tradition in the best Alexandrian style."[216]Ovid picked up on Vergil's allusion in theMetamorphoses with his treatment ofAtalanta, which recast's his Roman forebear's allusion to Iphiclus in such a way that it highlights the Hesiodic character of his own poem in contrast with the Homeric character of theAeneid.[217]

Transmission and reconstruction

[edit]

It is impossible to tell exactly when the last complete copy of theCatalogue was lost. Fragments of over fifty ancient copies have been found, dating from the Hellenistic period through early Byzantine times.[218] A book label from the century or so after the latestCatalogue papyrus lists the contents of a fifth- or sixth-century Hesiodiccodex as "Hesiod'sTheogony,Works and Days andShield", and it appears that by this time the Byzantine triad of Hesiod's works had become the notional corpus, to the detriment of the other poems which had traveled under the poet's name.[219] Knowledge of theCatalogue did not cease altogether with the loss of the final complete copy, however, and well into medieval times authors such asEustathius andTzetzes could cite the poem via fragments contained in other ancient authors. Other vestiges of the poem's influence are less clear: the Pseudo-ApollodoranBibliotheca, an early Roman-era handbook of Greek mythology, for example, is widely believed to have taken theCatalogue as its primary structural model, although this is not stated explicitly within that text.[220]

Drawing
Daniel Heinsius, editor of the first modern collection of the Hesiodic fragments

The collection and interpretation of the Hesiodic fragments in the modern era began during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, primarily with the editions ofHeinsius (1603) andGraevius (1667). The earliest collections simply presented ancient quotations organized by the quoting author, and it was not until the work ofLehmann (1828),Goettling (1831) andMarckscheffel (1840) that attempts at a proper reconstruction began.[221] Marckscheffel was the first to recognize that the early portions of the poem treated the descendants of Deucalion in a systematic fashion, but he regarded what were called the "Catalogue of Women" and "Ehoiai" as two initially separate works that had been joined: the former was genealogically structured, while the latter, in Marckscheffel's view, simply recounted myths involving notable Thessalian and Boeotian heroines, with each introduced by theē' hoiē-formula.[222] Since the Ehoie of Alcmene was attested for book 4, Marckscheffel proposed that books 1–3 were the "Catalogue", and books 4 and 5 were the "Ehoiai".[222]

As the nineteenth century progressed, there were several other important observations about the genealogical structure of theCatalogue. In 1860Adolf Kirchhoff noted the mass of information connected to the family of Io, a stemma which could be assigned to the third book because of an ancient citation placing Phineus, one of her descendants, there.[223] The picture of theCatalogue that was emerging began to resemble theBibliotheca in structure, butTheodor Bergk was the first to suggest explicitly (though in passing) that the poem might be reconstructed with the help of the mythographic work.[224] Bergk and his contemporaries still largely followed Marckscheffel's conclusion that theCatalogue andEhoiai were semi-distinct texts, and it was not until 1894 thatFriedrich Leo finally demonstrated that these were in fact alternate titles for a single poem.[225]

A few years before Leo's paper, the first small papyrus fragment was found, and the first half of the twentieth century would see the publication of several other pieces which added significantly to the modern text of theCatalogue.[226] Among these finds were important passages, the Catalogue of Suitors and Epithalamium of Peleus and Thetis for example, but few advanced the modern understanding of the work's overall structure.[227] The appearance of the proem in 1956 actually led to a major misapprehension, for the list of gods found therein, beginning with Zeus and proceeding through the divine Heracles, led some to believe that theCatalogue was not organized in a strictly genealogical manner, but presented the unions of gods and heroines organized to some extent by amorous deity.[228] Six years later, with the publication of the 28th part of theOxyrhynchus Papyri, the corpus of papyrus witnesses to the fragmentary Hesiodic poems was nearly doubled, with the lion's share of these new texts belonging to theCatalogue.[229] The new papyri proved once and for all that the poem was organized by genealogies of the great families in a way similar to theBibliotheca, and that the poet's use of theē' hoiē-formula was not a random method of introduction but an organizing tool within an overall structure.[230]

Editions and translations

[edit]

Critical editions

[edit]

Translations

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^TheLatintransliterationsEoeae andEhoeae are also used (e.g.Cantilena (1979),Solmsen (1981)); seeTitle and theē' hoiē-formula, below. Though rare,Mulierum Catalogus, the Latin translation ofΓυναικῶν Κατάλογος, might also be encountered (e.g.Nasta (2006)). The work is commonly cited by the abbreviationsCat.,CW (occasionallyHCW) orGK (=Gynaikon Katalogos).
  2. ^Unless noted otherwise, this article cites theCatalogue according to the text and numeration of the edition of record, that ofMerkelbach andWest (M–W). Several fragments have appeared since the publication of their primary edition (Merkelbach & West (1967)) and must be consulted in M–W's selection of fragments in the second and third editions of Solmsen'sOxford Classical TextHesiod (Merkelbach & West (1990)); such fragments are distinguished by appending "OCT" to the fragment number. Martina Hirschberger's text and commentary (Hirschberger (2004)) follows a different numeration and includes several fragments which M–W did not believe to belong to theCatalogue or were published after the appearance of the latest OCT. In the case of fragments found in Hirschberger but not M–W, or where her commentary contributes to the discussion at hand, her fragment numbers are specified. Almost all of the fragments printed by both M–W and Hirschberger can be found, with translation, inMost (2007) in which a table outlining these different numbering systems is also present.
  3. ^abcIn editions of texts transmitted by papyri, which are often damaged, a system of editorial markers is used to clarify the basis for the printed text (seeLeiden Conventions). The markers used in this article are:
    • Full brackets ( [ ] ) mark places where the papyrus is damaged beyond legibility; letters enclosed within these brackets are editorial conjectures, some of which will be more-or-less certain, while others will be strictlyexempli gratia supplements meant to give the required sense of the passage.
    • Dots below the line (   ̣) take the place of illegible letters; dots within full brackets give the approximate number of letters lost in alacuna. The primary use of the sub-dot is to mark doubtfully read letters (α̣β̣γ̣), but this convention is employed sparingly in the present article.
    • Half brackets ( ⌊ ⌋ ) enclose text that is supplied by another source, such as an ancient quotation.
  4. ^West (1963c, pp. 754–5) believes that Sisyphus had originally taken Mestra on credit, and Erysichthon claims, now that the girl is back in his possession, that the transaction has not been finalized. In West's opinion, the verdict forces Erysichthon to give him some goods as a penalty.Casanova (1977) believes that Sisyphus had paid for Mestra, and that Erysichthon now demands a new deal: the judgement rules against Erysichthon; further conjectures are presented byOrmand (2004, pp. 334–6).
  5. ^The general consensus is that this is Athena because she occasionally acts as Zeus's courier and because the goddess is referred to as the "daughter of great aegis-bearing Zeus" (αἰγιόχοιο Διὸς κούρη μεγάλοιο,aigiokhoio Dios kourē megaloio), one of Athena's common appellations; cf.Lobel (1964, p. 6),Janko (1984, p. 302),DePew (1994, pp. 413–15).Casanova (1969a, pp. 33–4), argues that similar epithets are also applied to Artemis, and that her central role in the myth and status as the goddess of both the hunt and the taming of animals would make her a deity more likely to cure the hunting dogs of their madness in line 15.
  6. ^More doubtful is the attribution of ten corrupt verses found in the manuscripts of Apld.Bibl.3.4.4 which concern the Actaeon myth. After relating the motivation for Actaeon's death which was found in theCatalogue (but attributing it toAcusilaus), Apld. reports the better-known version, in which the transformation and death are punishment for Actaeon's having seen Artemis bathing. He continues to say that Artemis transformed him into a stag and drove the dogs into a "madness" (λύσσα, cf. P.Oxy. 2509.15) so that they wouldn't recognize their master as they devoured him. Distraught, they then went in search of Actaeon, before coming back to the cave of Chiron, who made an image of the dead man so as to cease their grief. Following this paraphrase are the ten verses interpolated into the text of theBibliotheca (Janko (1984, p. 305)) which name some of the hounds and describe their rending of Actaeon.Malten (1911, pp. 20–3) andCasanova (1969a) believe that these lines also derive from theCatalogue, but many consider them Hellenistic (e.g.Powell (1925)), and none of the recent editions include them; cf.Janko (1984, pp. 305–7).
  7. ^The situation is complicated by the fact that the word translated as "verses" above,ἔπη, can also mean "poem" (cf.LSJ s.v. ἔπος).Hirschberger (2004, p. 42), appears to follow the latter interpretation; cf., already,Marckscheffel (1840, p. 140) on this passage andMerkelbach & West (1965, p. 300) on a similar issue regarding theWedding of Ceyx.

References

[edit]
  1. ^West (1985a, p. 3); cf.Hunter (2005b).
  2. ^TheCatalogue as "map" is fromHunter (2005b, p. 1); for constructions of intra-Hellenic identities, seeWest (1985a, pp. 7–11),Fowler (1998),Hunter (2005b, p. 3).
  3. ^Osborne (2005, p. 6).
  4. ^For the ancient naming conventions, seeWest (1985a, p. 1) andHirschberger (2004, pp. 26–30). The pluralCatalogues of Women also appears inMenander Rhetor; seeMerkelbach & West (1967, p. 2), while the corresponding shorthandCatalogues is slightly more common (e.g.Schol.A.R. 3.1086 =Cat.fr. 2.); cf.West (1985a, p. 1 n. 1), andHirschberger (2004, p. 26 n. 35).
  5. ^Suda s.v.Ἡσίοδος (η 583); Tzetzes,Exegesis of the Iliad p. 63.14.Cardin (2009) argues that Tzetzes understoodHeroic Genealogy to be the title of a work distinct from theCatalogue.Servius (onVergil,Aeneid 7.268) calls the poemΠερὶ γυναικῶν,Concerning Women.
  6. ^The titleEhoiai is formed from the plural of the formula,ἠ' οἷαι (ē' hoîai); cf.Hesychius η 650,Ἠοῖαι· ὁ Κατάλογος Ἡσιόδου, "Ehoiai: Hesiod'sCatalogue".
  7. ^Cohen (1986) has argued that theCatalogue andMegalai Ehoiai were the same poem, or that the latter was the title of an expanded edition of the former, but the vast majority of scholars view these as two distinct works; see, most recently,D'Alessio (2005a).
  8. ^Rutherford (2000, pp. 92–3).
  9. ^West (1985a, p. 35),Hirschberger (2004, pp. 30–1).
  10. ^Cat. fr. 43a; cf.West (1985a, p. 64).
  11. ^Suda s.v.Ἡσίοδος (η 583).
  12. ^Around 4000:Osborne (2005, p. 6); possibly more than 5000:Cingano (2009, p. 96).West (1985a, pp. 75–6) supposes that book 1 was roughly 900 lines long.
  13. ^West (1985a, p. 44).
  14. ^West (1985a, pp. 44–5); seeTransmission and reconstruction below.
  15. ^West (1985a, pp. 72–6) provides an inductive survey of the evidence.
  16. ^Lobel (1956, p. 1).
  17. ^Theogony 965–8.
  18. ^Cat. fr. 1.6–7: "For common then were the tables, common the thrones, among immortal gods and humans liable to death." (ξυναὶ γὰρ τότε δα⌊ῖτες ἔσαν, ξυνοὶ δὲ θόωκοι |ἀθανάτοις τε θε⌊οῖσι καταθνητοῖς τ' ἀνθρώποις.); cf.Clauss (1990) on Thecoritus' and Apollonius' engagement with this couplet,Pontani (2000) on Catllus 64. InRzach (1913) this couplet (his fr. 82) is tentatively assigned to the wedding of Peleus and Thetis.
  19. ^Comparison among heroes:West (1961, p. 141), cf.West (1985a, p. 124),Clay (2005, pp. 26–7); comparison between heroes and contemporary men:Merkelbach (1968c, p. 129); comparison between heroes and gods:Stiewe (1962, p. 292), followingMerkelbach (1957). Further theories can be found inTreu (1957), and a summary of the issues, with further bibliography, will be found atHirschberger (2004, pp. 164, 165, 167).
  20. ^Cat. fr. 1.11–14.
  21. ^Cat. fr. 1.15–22. The supplement of Hephaestus' name in line 20 was proposed byLobel (1956) and accepted byStiewe (1962) andMost (2007).
  22. ^West (1985a, pp. 50–3, 56).
  23. ^West (1985a, pp. 55–6) thinks that it did not;Hirschberger (2004, p. 34 n. 89) holds the opposite view.
  24. ^Cat. fr. 234; cf.West (1985a, p. 52).
  25. ^West (1985a, pp. 50–3, 56); cf.Cat. frr. 3 and 9.
  26. ^West (1985a, p. 173).
  27. ^Thyia:Cat. fr. 7; Protogeneia:West (1985a, p. 52); Pandora:Cat. fr. 5.
  28. ^West (1985a, p. 57).
  29. ^West (1985a, p. 57); cf.Cat. fr. 10a.6–7 OCT.
  30. ^Cf.West (1985a, p. 57),Tyrtaeus frr. 2.12–15, 19.8.
  31. ^Cat. fr. 10a.20–4 OCT.
  32. ^Zeus was presumably only the father of Hellen, not Pyrrha's daughters, with all of whom he had sex; cf.West (1985a, p. 56).
  33. ^AfterWest (1985a, pp. 53, 173).
  34. ^West (1985a, pp. 72–6).
  35. ^Cat. fr. 10a.25–8 OCT. For the form ofDeion–Deioneus' name, seeWest (1983).
  36. ^AtBibliotheca1.7.3 the seventh son is named as Magnes and made father of Dictys and Polydectes at1.9.6; this latter detail matches a verse quotation of theCatalogue:Μάγνης δ' αὖ Δίκτυν τε καὶ ἀντίθεον Πολυέκτεα, "Now, Magnes (sired) Dictys and godlike Polydectes" (fr. 8).Merkelbach & West (1967) follow previous editors in identifying this Magnes with the eponym of the Magnetes.
  37. ^Cat. fr. 10a.33–4 OCT.
  38. ^Cat. fr. 10a.35–57.
  39. ^The birth of their mother, their birth and characteristics are reported in frr. 17–18.
  40. ^Cat fr. 23a.17–26; cf. fr. 23b =Pausanias1.43.1.
  41. ^Cat. fr. 23a.7–12.
  42. ^Cat. fr. 23a.14–16.
  43. ^Cat. fr. 23a.17–26.
  44. ^Cat. fr. 23a.27–30.Odyssey 1.35–43 only mentions the killing ofAegisthus.
  45. ^Cat. fr. 25.1–13.
  46. ^Cat. fr. 25.20–33.
  47. ^Cat. fr. 27–8.
  48. ^Cat. fr. 30
  49. ^Cat. fr. 30.1–14.
  50. ^Cat. Fr. 30.15–30.
  51. ^Cat. frr. 30.31–42, 31, 32.
  52. ^Cat. frr. 33a.1–5, 37.17–18.
  53. ^Cat. frr. 33a, 34, 35.1–9.
  54. ^Cat. frr. 33a.12–36, 33b.
  55. ^Cat. frr. 35–7.
  56. ^Cat. fr. 37.
  57. ^Cat. frr. 38–40 treat of Aeson, Pheres and Amythaon; cf.West (1985a, pp. 75–6).
  58. ^West (1985a, pp. 75–6), but seebelow on the problem of the Atalanta-Ehoie.
  59. ^Cat. fr. 68;West (1985a, p. 66).
  60. ^Cat. fr. 68;Pseudo-Apollodorus,Bibliotheca1.9.1,Hirschberger (2004, p. 255).
  61. ^Cat frr. 69*, 70.1–7,Bibliotheca1.9.2,West (1985a, p. 66).
  62. ^Cat. fr. 70.8–43;West (1985a, p. 66 n. 79).
  63. ^West (1985a, pp. 75–6).
  64. ^West (1985a, p. 76); the order Perieres-Deion-Sisyphus is guaranteed by transitions between their families preserved in P.Oxy. XXVIII 2495. Note that this means that the fragment numbers in M–W's edition do not reflect the order of the poem. This group runs: frr. 49–58, 62–67, then 43a.
  65. ^West (1985a, p. 140).
  66. ^West (1985a, pp. 67–8).
  67. ^Cat. frr. 50–8.
  68. ^The transition is found in fr. 58; cf.West (1985a, p. 68).
  69. ^Cat. fr. 58.12–13.
  70. ^Cat. fr. 64.15–18.
  71. ^West (1985a, p. 68).
  72. ^Cat. frr. 66–7.
  73. ^Polymele is likely born at fr. 43a.1, with the Ehoie of Mestra beginning in the next line; cf.West (1985a, p. 68).
  74. ^Cf.Fletcher (2006).
  75. ^Cat. fr. 43a.5–6; cf. fr. 43b.
  76. ^The back story of the episode is summarized in fr. 43b = scholia onLycophron 1393.
  77. ^Cat. fr. 43a.18–34.
  78. ^Cat. fr. 43a.36–40.
  79. ^West (1985a, p. 169) believes that the mediator "can only be Athena," but corruption in the papyrus must be assumed in order to supply her name; cf.Merkelbach & West (1967, fr. 43a.38app. crit.).Casanova (1977, p. 23) prefers theOracle at Delphi.Kakridis (1975, pp. 21–2) would have Mestra deliver the verdict herself.
  80. ^Cat. fr. 43a.51–4.
  81. ^Cat. fr. 43a.55–9.
  82. ^Cat. fr. 43a.60–5.
  83. ^Cat. fr. 43a.66–9.
  84. ^Cat. fr. 43a.71–4.
  85. ^Cat. fr. 43a.75–7.
  86. ^Cat. fr. 43a.81–7.
  87. ^Iliad 6.174–83.
  88. ^Cat. fr. 43a.88–91.
  89. ^Bibliotheca2.1.1.
  90. ^West (1985a, p. 76).
  91. ^Cat. fr. 124 =Bibliotheca2.1.3; for the genealogy Inachus–Phoroneus–Niobe–Argus–Peiren–Io, seeWest (1985a, pp. 76–7).
  92. ^Cat. fr. 124. Hermes' epithetArgeiphontes was also used in theCatalogue, apparently derived explicitly from the fact that he slewArgus Panoptes, whom Hera sent to watch over Io (fr. 126).
  93. ^This detail is not explicitly attested for theCat., but, according toWest (1985a, p. 77), "the tradition is more or less unanimous that Io bore Epaphos to Zeus in Egypt, and that Epaphos was the father of Libye."
  94. ^Cat. fr. 137 = Strabo1.2.34.
  95. ^Merkelbach & West (1967, p. 61, app. crit. to fr. 127),West (1985a, p. 78).
  96. ^abCat. fr. 127.
  97. ^Cat. fr. 128; Eustathius gives a different version on this verse,Ἄργος ἄνυδρον ἐὸν Δαναὸς ποίησεν εὔυδρον, "Danaus made waterless Argos well-watered Argos."
  98. ^Cat. fr. 129.1–8;West (1985a, p. 78).
  99. ^Cat. frr. 129–33; discussion of the motivation for the curse atWest (1985a, pp. 78–9).
  100. ^Cat. fr. 135;West (1985a, p. 82).
  101. ^Cf.West (2006a, p. 289).
  102. ^Meliadò (2003); cf.West (2006a, p. 289).
  103. ^This isCat. fr. 71A.12.
  104. ^West (1985a, p. 67).
  105. ^Cf.West (1985a, p. 67) andMost (2007, p. 110, his fr. 47).
  106. ^West (1985a, p. 49);Davies (1986, p. 8) considers his "exciting" judgement to be "one of the few really implausible portions" of West's study.
  107. ^Cat. frr. 73.4–5, 75.1–11.
  108. ^Cat. frr. 73.4–5, 75; cf.Hirschberger (2004, pp. 460–1).
  109. ^Cat. fr. 76,Hirschberger (2004, p. 459)
  110. ^Cat. fr. 72 = Philodemus,De pietata B6559–66 Obbink, the updated text of which is printed asMost (2007, pp. 116–7) (his fr. 51), whence the translation. For the "crime" of Atalanta, seeHirschberger (2004, pp. 458–9), who compares Ovid,Metamorphoses 10. 560–704. (Hirschberger was unaware of Obbink's updated text of Philodemus.)
  111. ^D'Alessio (2005a, pp. 214–15).
  112. ^D'Alessio (2005a, pp. 215).
  113. ^West (1985a, p. 152).
  114. ^West (1985a, pp. 82–3).
  115. ^Cat. fr. 139.
  116. ^Cat. fr. 138, 140; Moschus,Europa 40. For Europa's mother seeWest (1985a, p. 82).
  117. ^abCat. fr. 140.
  118. ^Cat. frr. 140, 141.1–2
  119. ^Cat. frr. 140, 141.3–14, 142.
  120. ^Cat. fr. 141.20 app. crit. with Apld.3.1.2.
  121. ^Cat. fr. 141.22–30.
  122. ^Cat. fr. 145.10–17 with app. crit.
  123. ^Cat. frr. 145.9, 146; cf. fr. 146A OCT.West (1985a, p. 84 with n. 118) believes there were who were doublets;Hirschberger (2004, p. 317) takes Androgeos and Eurygyes for a single son.
  124. ^abWest (1985a, p. 84).
  125. ^Cat. frr. 157, 151.
  126. ^Cat. frr. 150–6.
  127. ^Cat. frr. 150–3.
  128. ^Ephorus =Cat. fr. 151.Marckscheffel (1840, pp. 197–8) gives the background of the debate, but correctly concluded that theGês Períodos was part of theCatalogue.
  129. ^West (1985a, pp. 90–1).
  130. ^Cat. fr. 160 (with the app. crit. citing Apld.3.8.1) and fr. 161.
  131. ^West (1985a, p. 91).
  132. ^West (1985a, pp. 91–2),Cat. fr. 163 = Apld.3.8.2; for the crimes of Lycaon's family see fr. 164.
  133. ^Cat. fr. 163 with app. crit.
  134. ^abWest (1985a, p. 93); cf.Cat. fr. 129.17–18.
  135. ^Cat. fr. 165.1–13. Heracles was at the time campaigning against Troy for the horses ofLaomedon.
  136. ^Cat. fr. 165.14–25.
  137. ^Cat. fr. 170*
  138. ^West (1985a, p. 180).
  139. ^Cat. fr. 177.5–12.
  140. ^Cat. fr. 177.13–15.
  141. ^Cat. fr. 181; cf.West (1985a, pp. 97–9).
  142. ^Renner (1978, pp. 287–9).
  143. ^Cat. fr. 244*,West (1985a, p. 99).
  144. ^West (1985a, p. 99).
  145. ^Merkelbach & West (1967, p. 93, fr. 195 app. crit.) The statement of the scholia was confirmed by the publication of P.Oxy. XXIII 2355, which contains the verses preceding the section borrowed by the poet of theShield; cf.Lobel (1956, p. 3).
  146. ^Cat. fr. 195 (Sc.) 14–19.
  147. ^Cat. fr. 195 (Sc.) 27–37.
  148. ^Cat. fr. 195 (Sc.) 51–6.
  149. ^Cat. frr. 190, 193;West (1985a, p. 110).
  150. ^Cat. fr. 193 (with app. crit.);West (1985a, p. 111).
  151. ^Cat. fr. 194,West (1985a, p. 110).
  152. ^Cat. fr. 195.1–7.
  153. ^Hirschberger (2004, p. 41), in her survey of the conclusive evidence for each book's content, lists no evidence for book 4 other than the Alcmene-Ehoie's attribution.
  154. ^West (1985a, pp. 103–9).
  155. ^West (1985a, p. 100).
  156. ^abCat. fr. 205.
  157. ^West (1985a, pp. 111, 181).
  158. ^Cingano (2005, p. 119). The length and placement of the Catalogue of Suitors is known from abeta to the left of fr. 204.94 marking that verse as the 200th line of its book; cf.Schwartz (1960, p. 416),West (1985a, pp. 114–17).
  159. ^West (1985a, p. 117).
  160. ^Cat. fr. 196.6–9. The text is unclear, but their absence from the war at Troy and the presence of the word "but" as the text breaks off imply that they were never bound by the oath of Tyndareus (Cingano (2005, pp. 140–1)).
  161. ^Cat. fr. 198.2–8.
  162. ^Cat. fr. 198.9–12.
  163. ^Cat. fr. 199.4–12; cf.Iliad 2.704–6 withWest (1985a, p. 68 n. 87).
  164. ^Cat. fr. 200.3–9.
  165. ^Cat. fr. 204.44–51,Cingano (2005, pp. 144–9).Finkelberg (1988) believes that Ajax actually ruled these surrounding countries in theCatalogue.
  166. ^Cat. fr. 204.56–63. Another Cretan, Lycomedes, wooed as well (Cat. fr. 202).Hirschberger (2004, p. 412, on her fr. 110.65) identifies this Lycomedes with the "son of Creon" atIliad 9.84.
  167. ^Cat fr. 204.78–85.
  168. ^Cingano (2005, p. 129).
  169. ^Cat. fr. 204.89–92, trans.Most (2007, p. 233, his fr. 155).
  170. ^Cat. fr. 204.94–5.
  171. ^Cat. fr. 204.95ff.
  172. ^West (1985a, p. 119)
  173. ^Clay (2005, pp. 29–31) andGonzalez (2010).
  174. ^Cat. fr. 204.124–30; the text is that ofHirschberger (2004) fr. 110, incorporating the emendations ofBeck (1980).
  175. ^West (1961, p. 133).
  176. ^Clay (2005, pp. 33–4); cf,Iliad 2.308–20.
  177. ^Clay (2005, pp. 33–4); cf.West (1985a, p. 120).
  178. ^These areCat. frr. 205–245. InWest (1985a),Hirschberger (2004) andMost (2007) are offered tentative assignments for many fragments unplaced inMerkelbach & West (1967). There are also a handful of papyrus fragments which derive from the same rolls as securely interpreted fragments, but are so minuscule that their interpretation will be all but impossible until other papyri are found to overlap them.Cat. frr. 79–86 and 88–120 all appear to belong to rolls which preserve the first two books, but many are so small that even the identification of their sources is obscure; cf.Merkelbach & West (1967, p. v).
  179. ^West (1985a, p. 132).
  180. ^Janko (1982, p. 248 n. 38); the table outlining his dating is found on page 200. For the position that Thessalian Cyrene does not presuppose the city of the same name, cf.Dräger (1993, pp. 221–9).
  181. ^D'Alessio (2005a, pp. 206–7); cf.Cohen (1986, p. 34).
  182. ^The Aristaeus fragments are 215 and 216, neither of which are explicitly assigned to theCatalogue by the testimonia; cf.D'Alessio (2005a, p. 207) who notes that Cyrene is the only known mother of Aristaeus.
  183. ^Cat. fr. 217A OCT, first edited byRenner (1978). Before the publication of the dictionary, some version of the myth appeared to be attributed to theCat. (called theEhoiai) byPhilodemus (On Piety B 6552–55Obbink), but, because of great damage to that text, Merkelbach and West printed it as a doubtful fragment (fr. 346); the Philodemus fragment contains very little more than the name Actaeon and the citation.
  184. ^The role of Zeus in the myth is not made explicit (or, at least, does not survive) in the papyri, but has been assumed by scholars; cf.Renner (1978, p. 283),Hirschberger (2004, p. 394).
  185. ^Lobel (1964, pp. 4–7). This is P.Oxy. XXX 2509, printed asCat. fr. 103 inHirschberger (2004) and fr. 162 inMost (2007).
  186. ^West (1966b, p. 22). Twenty years later, West was "still loth to believe" the fragment was Hesiodic (West (1985a, p. 88)). (À propos ofCat. fr. 42, which reports that Chiron married aNaiad, M–W do, however, cite a parallel at P.Oxy. 2509, line 3.)
  187. ^Most (2007, p. 245 n. 66), without naming names—none of the scholarship cited in the present article mentions this opinion, and Most might here be confusing this papyrus with the passages found in theBibliotheca discussedbelow.
  188. ^On the age of the fragment, seeJanko (1984) andFührer (1989); the case is made for its inclusion in theCatalogue byCasanova (1969a),Janko (1984) andHirschberger (2004).
  189. ^West (1985a, p. 127),Hirschberger (2004, p. 42),Cingano (2009, p. 105).
  190. ^Paus.9.31.4.
  191. ^Ael.VA 12.36 =Cat. fr. 183; the translation given above is that ofMost (2007, p. 195, his fr. 127).
  192. ^Cf.Solmsen (1982),Wilamowitz (1905, pp. 123–4). Compare Pausanias2.26.7 =Cat. fr. 50, who says that someone might have inserted into theCatalogue an account of Asclepius' birth which made the healing god a son of Messenian Arsinoe in order to please the Messenians.
  193. ^West (1985a, p. 127); Apollonius: apud Arg. in Hes.Sc. =Cat. fr. 230; Aristophanes: apud Arg. in Hes.Sc. = cited app. crit.Cat. fr. 195; Crates: schol. Hes.Th. 142 =Cat. fr. 52.
  194. ^For Hesiod'sfloruit as c. 730–690, seeWest (1966a, pp. 43–6).
  195. ^Janko (1982, pp. 85–7).
  196. ^Janko (2011, pp. 42–3).
  197. ^Cingano (2009, pp. 26–28).
  198. ^Cingano (2009, p. 28), cf.Marcotte (1988).
  199. ^Rutherford (2011, pp. 153–4).
  200. ^West (1999, p. 380); cf.West (1985a, pp. 136–7).
  201. ^Cat. fr. 10a.20–4 OCT,West (1985a, pp. 57–8, 106); cf thetable above.
  202. ^West (1985a, p. 133).Schwartz (1960, pp. 488–9), even posits a connection between the Catalogue of Helen's Suitors and the competition for the hand of Cleisthenes' daughterAgariste.
  203. ^West (1985a, p. 130), citing himself:West (1966a, pp. 417, 430, 436)
  204. ^Proposed atWest (1985a, p. 136),West (1999, p. 380).
  205. ^It is considered persuasive, if not certain, by (e.g.)Davies (1986) andRutherford (2005).
  206. ^Fowler (1998).
  207. ^Hirschberger (2004, pp. 48–51).West (1985a, pp. 133–4), does not believe that Stesichorus actually alluded to theCatalogue, but that he alluded to another epic (or epic tradition) which paralleled the content of the Hesiodic poem; the authors who report that Stesichorus engaged with "Hesiod" on this point engaged in inference, according to West. Viewing theCatalogue as a product of a period when writing had already become a widely employed medium,Nasta (2006) also considers the late seventh or early sixth century BCE to be the likeliest period of composition.
  208. ^See, for example,Hunter (2005c),Asquith (2005) and the allusions to the poem collected inWest (1969) andWest (1986).
  209. ^Leontion fr. 7.21–26Powell=3Lightfoot. The rendering ofὑμνῶν, whence English "to hymn", in line 26 as "in homage" is Lightfoot's.
  210. ^Asquith (2005, pp. 280–1), who notes the allusion to theWorks and Days passage:νάσσατο δ' ἄγχ'Ἑλικῶνος ὀιζυρῆι ἐνὶκώμηι |Ἄσκρηι, χεῖμα κακῆι, θέρει ἀργαλέηι, οὐδέ ποτ' ἐσθλῆι, "He [Hesiod's father] settled in a miserable village near Helicon, Ascra, vile in winter, painful in summer, never good."
  211. ^Phanocles frr. 1–6Powell.
  212. ^Nicaenetus fr. 2Powell. SosicratesSH 732.
  213. ^SeeAsquith (2005) for reconsideration of the relation between theCatalogue and HellenisticKollektivgedichte.
  214. ^In addition to Catullus' translating a section theAetia (Carm. 66, the "Coma Berenices"), inCarm. 116 he mentions a desire to send an erstwhile friend the poems of Callimachus in order to soften his attitude toward Catullus (Saepe tibi studioso animo verba ante requirens |carmina uti possem vertere Battiadae, |qui te lenirem nobis, neu conarere |tela infesta meum mittere in usque caput, 116.1–4). On Catullus and Alexandrianism, see, conveniently,Clausen (1982).
  215. ^Pontani (2000).
  216. ^Boyd (1992, pp. 231–3).
  217. ^Ziogas (2011).
  218. ^West (1985a, p. 1). The earliest papyrus is P.Lit.Lond. 32 (Cat. fr. 73), which dates to the early third century BC; the latest is P.Berol. inv. 9777 (frr. 25 & 26), which is assigned to the fourth century AD.
  219. ^West (1966a, pp. 51–2); thesyllabos belongs to P. Achmîn 3.
  220. ^Cf.West (1985a, pp. 32, 35, 43–6). The validity of this view has occasionally been questioned (e.g.Heilinger (1983)).
  221. ^The following survey owes much toWest (1985a, pp. 31–50), who, however, passes over the contributions of Lehmann and Goettling in silence.
  222. ^abWest (1985a, p. 31).
  223. ^Kirchhoff (1860).
  224. ^Bergk (1872, p. 1002 n. 83).
  225. ^Leo (1894).
  226. ^West (1985a, p. 33), where a list of the papyri published before 1962 can be found in n. 10. The first papyrus published was the Atalanta fragment picturedabove.
  227. ^West (1985a, p. 33).
  228. ^E.g.Treu (1957); cf.West (1985a, pp. 34–5).
  229. ^West (1963b, p. 752); the publication isLobel (1962).
  230. ^West (1985a, p. 35).

Bibliography

[edit]
Jump to :ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVW – X – Y –Z
  • Aguirre Castro, M. (2005), "Expressions of Love and Sexual Union in Hesiod'sCatalogue of Women",CFC (G): Estudios griegos e indoeuropeos,15:19–25.
  • Alfonsi, L. (1949), "Ps.-Esiodo in Properzio?",Revue de Philologie,1:17–26.
  • Andersen, Ø.; Haugh, D.T.T. (2011),Relative Chronology in Early Greek Epic Poetry, Cambridge,ISBN 9780521194976{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Arrighetti, A., "IlCatalogo esiodeo: un genere letterario?", inBastianini & Casanova (2008), pp. 11–27.
  • Arthur, M.B. (1984), "Early Greece: The Origins of the Western Attitude toward Women", in J. Peradotto; J.P. Sullivan (eds.),Women in the Ancient World: The Arethusa Papers, Albany, pp. 7–58,ISBN 978-0-87395-773-1{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Asquith, H. (2005), "From Genealogy toCatalogue: The Hellenistic Adaptation of the Hesiodic Catalogue Form", inHunter (2005a), pp. 266–86.
  • Barron, J.P.; Easterling, P.E., "Hesiod", inEasterling & Knox (1985), pp. 92–105.
  • Bastianini, G.; Casanova, A. (2008),Esiodo. cent'anni di papiri, Florence,ISBN 978-88-87829-36-5{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Beck, W. (1980), "Hesiod Fr. 204, 127 M.–W.",Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik,38: 46,JSTOR 20171844.
  • Bergk, T. (1872),Griechische Litteraturgeschichte, vol. i, Berlin{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Boyd, B.W. (1992), "Virgil's Camilla and the Traditions of Catalogue and Ecphrasis (Aeneid 7.803–17)",American Journal of Philology,113 (2):213–34,doi:10.2307/295558,JSTOR 295558.
  • Cantilena, M. (1979), "LeEoeae e la tradizione orale",Athenaeum,97:139–45.
  • Cardin, M (2009), "Heroogonia. IlCatalogo delle donne di Giovanni Tzetze",Philologus,153 (2):237–49,doi:10.1524/phil.2009.0018,S2CID 161507691.
  • Casanova, A. (1967a), "Sulla tecnica narrativa in alcuni passi delleEee",Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica,96:31–8.
  • Casanova, A. (1968), "Le nipoti di Atamante nelCatalogo esiodeo",Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica,40:169–77.
  • Casanova, A. (1969a), "Il mito di Atteone nelCatalogo esiodeo",Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica,97:31–46.
  • Casanova, A. (1969b), "(review ofMerkelbach & West (1967))",Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica,97:452–60.
  • Casanova, A. (1970), "Tre note alCatalogo esiodeo",Studia Florentina Alexandro Ronconi Sexagenario Oblata, Rome, pp. 61–7{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Casanova, A. (1973), "Un frammento trascurato e il problema della divisione in libri delCatalogo esiodeo",Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica,45:3–27.
  • Casanova, A. (1977), "Lite per un matrimonio truffaldino nella Grecia arcaica (Hes. fr. 43 M.–W.)",Prometheus,3:21–38.
  • Casanova, A. (1978), "Mestra e il re Cos in Esiodo",Prometheus,4:202–6.
  • Casanova, A. (1979),La famiglia di Pandora: analisi filologica dei miti di Pandora e Prometeo nella tradizione esiodea, Florence{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Casanova, A., "Cent'anni di papiri esiodei", inBastianini & Casanova (2008), pp. 1–10.
  • Cassio, A.C., "The Language of Hesiod and theCorpus Hesiodeum", inMontanari, Rengakos & Tsagalis (2009), pp. 179–201.
  • Cingano, E. (2005), "A Catalogue within a Catalogue: Helen's Suitors in the HesiodicCatalogue of Women (frr. 196–204)", inHunter (2005a), pp. 118–52.
  • Cingano, E., "The Hesiodic Corpus", inMontanari, Rengakos & Tsagalis (2009), pp. 91–130.
  • Clausen, W.V., "The New Direction in Poetry", inKenney & Clausen (1982), pp. 178–206.
  • Clauss, J.J. (1990), "Hellenistic Imitations of Hesiod Catalogue of Women fr. 1, 6–7 M.-W.",Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica,36 (3):129–40,doi:10.2307/20547068,JSTOR 20547068
  • Clay, J.S. (2003),Hesiod's Cosmos, Cambridge,ISBN 978-1-139-44058-5{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Clay, J.S. (2005), "The Beginning and End of the HesiodicCatalogue of Women and its Relation to Hesiod", inHunter (2005a), pp. 25–34.
  • Cohen, I.M. (1986), "The HesiodicCatalogue of Women andMegalai Ehoiai",Phoenix,40 (2):127–42,doi:10.2307/1088507,JSTOR 1088507.
  • Cohen, I.M. (1989–1990), "Traditional Language and the Women in the HesiodicCatalogue of Women",Scripta Classica Israelica,10:12–27,doi:10.71043/sci.v10i.4613.
  • Crönert, W. (1907), "Nachprüfung der Berliner Reste der Hesiodischen Kataloge",Hermes,42 (4):608–13,JSTOR 4473100.
  • D'Alessio, G.B. (1996), "Esiodo, fr. 193,8 M.–W.",Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik,110: 100,JSTOR 20189670.
  • D'Alessio, G.B. (2005a), "TheMegalai Ehoiai: A Survey of the Fragments", inHunter (2005a), pp. 176–216.
  • D'Alessio, G.B. (2005b). "Ordered from theCatalogue: Pindar, Bacchylides and Hesiodic Genealogical Poetry". InHunter (2005a), pp. 217–38..
  • D'Alessio, G.B. (2005c), "review ofHirschberger (2004)",Bryn Mawr Classical Review, 2005.02.31.
  • Davies, M. (1986), "(review ofWest (1985a))",Classical Review,36 (1):6–8,doi:10.1017/S0009840X00104779,JSTOR 3064211,S2CID 163229375.
  • De Sanctis, D., "La geografia mitica delCatalogo: Europa e Fineo", inBastianini & Casanova (2008), pp. 129–51.
  • DePew, M. (1994), "POxy 2509 and Callimachus'Lavacrum Palladis:αἰγιόχοιο Διὸς κούρη μεγάλοιο",Classical Quarterly,44 (2):410–26,doi:10.1017/s000983880004386x,JSTOR 639644,S2CID 170911616.
  • Doherty, L.E. (2006), "Putting the Women back into the HesiodicCatalogue of Women", in M. Leonard; V. Zajko (eds.),Laughing at Medusa: Classical Myth and Feminist Thought, Oxford, pp. 297–325,ISBN 978-0-19-927438-3{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Doherty, L.E. (2008), "Nausikaa and Tyro: Idylls of Courtship in the Phaiakian Episode of theOdyssey and the HesiodicCatalogue of Women",Phoenix,62:63–76.
  • Dräger, P. (1993),Argo Pasimelousa. Der Argonautenmythos in der griechischen und römischen Literatur. Teil 1: Theos aitios, Stuttgart,ISBN 978-3-515-05974-9{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Dräger, P. (1997),Untersuchungen zu den Frauenkatalogen Hesiods, Stuttgart,ISBN 978-3-515-07028-7{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Easterling, P.E.;Knox, B.M.W. (1985),The Cambridge History of Classical Literature: Greek Literature, Cambridge,ISBN 978-0-521-21042-3{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Edwards, G.P. (1980), "The Structure of Homeric Catalogues",Transactions of the American Philological Association,110:81–105,doi:10.2307/284212,JSTOR 284212.
  • Finkelberg, M. (1988), "Ajax's Entry in the HesiodicCatalogue of Women",Classical Quarterly,38 (1):31–41,doi:10.1017/s0009838800031232,JSTOR 639202,S2CID 170458787.
  • Fletcher, K. (2006), "review ofHunter (2005a)",Bryn Mawr Classical Review, 2006.10.03.
  • Fletcher, R. (2005), "Or such as Ovid'sMetamorphoses ...", inHunter (2005a), pp. 299–319.
  • Fowler, R.L. (1998), "Genealogical Thinking, Hesiod'sCatalogue, and the Creation of the Hellenes",Cambridge Classical Journal,44:1–19,doi:10.1017/s0068673500002200,S2CID 140149089.
  • Führer, R. (1989),"Hes. P.Oxy. 2509",Museum Helveticum,46:237–8, archived fromthe original on 2012-04-06, retrieved2011-12-18.
  • Gagné, R.; Höschele, R. (2009), "Works and Nights (Marcus Argentarius,AP 9.161)",Cambridge Classical Journal,55:59–72,doi:10.1017/S1750270500000191,S2CID 170585508.
  • Garvie, A.F. (1988),Aeschylus: Choephori, Oxford,ISBN 978-0-19-872134-5{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Giangrande, G. (1970), "Hesiod's Fragments (review ofMerkelbach & West (1967))",Classical Review,20 (2):151–6,doi:10.1017/s0009840x00262197,JSTOR 709670,S2CID 162996620.
  • Gonzalez, J.M. (2010), "TheCatalogue of Women and the End of the Heroic Age (Hes. fr. 204.94–103 M–W)",Transactions of the American Philological Association,140 (2):375–422,doi:10.1353/apa.2010.a402238,JSTOR 40890984,S2CID 259787408.
  • Griffin, J. (1977), "The Epic Cycle and the Uniqueness of Homer",Journal of Hellenic Studies,97:39–53,doi:10.2307/631020,JSTOR 631020,S2CID 163041110.
  • Hadjicosti, I.L. (2005), "Hesiod fr. 212B (MW): Death at the Skaean Gates",Mnemosyne,68 (4):547–54,JSTOR 4433685.
  • Hardie, P. (2005), "The HesiodicCatalogue of Women and Latin Poetry", inHunter (2005a), pp. 287–98.
  • Haubold, J. (2005), "Heracles in the HesiodicCatalogue of Women", inHunter (2005a), pp. 85–98.
  • Heilinger, K. (1983),"Der Freierkatalog der Helena im hesiodeischen Frauenkatalog I",Museum Helveticum,40:19–34, archived fromthe original on 2012-04-06, retrieved2011-11-03.
  • Hirschberger, M., "Il tema della metamorfosi nelCatalogo esiodeo delle donne", inBastianini & Casanova (2008), pp. 113–27.
  • Hopkinson, N. (1984),Callimachus: Hymn to Demeter, Cambridge,ISBN 978-0-521-60436-9{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Hopkinson, N. (1988),A Hellenistic Anthology, Cambridge,ISBN 978-0-521-31425-1{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Hornblower, S.; Spawforth, A. (1996),Oxford Classical Dictionary (3rd rev. ed.), Oxford,ISBN 978-0-19-866172-6{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Hunter, R. (1999),Theocritus: A Selection, Cambridge,ISBN 978-0-521-57416-7{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Hunter, R. (2005a),The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women: Constructions and Reconstructions, Cambridge,ISBN 978-0-521-83684-5{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Hunter, R. (2005b), Introduction, inHunter (2005a), pp. 1–4.
  • Hunter, R. (2005c), "The HesiodicCatalogue and Hellenistic Poetry", inHunter (2005a), pp. 1–4.
  • Irwin, E. (2005), "Gods among Men? The Social and Political Dynamics of the HesiodicCatalogue of Women", inHunter (2005a), pp. 35–84.
  • Janko, R. (1982),Homer, Hesiod and the Hymns, Cambridge,ISBN 978-0-521-23869-4{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Janko, R. (1984), "P.Oxy. 2509: Hesiod'sCatalogue on the Death of Actaeon",Phoenix,38 (4):299–307,doi:10.2307/1088377,JSTOR 1088377.
  • Janko, R., "πρῶτόν τε καὶ ὕστατιον αἰὲν ἀείδειν: Relative Chronology and the Literary History of Early Greek Epos", inAndersen & Haugh (2011), pp. 20–43.
  • Johnson, M. (2003), "Catullus 2b: The Development of a Relationship in thePasser Trilogy",The Classical Journal,99 (1):11–34,JSTOR 3298079.
  • Kakridis, J.-Th. (1958), "Ποίκιλα Ἑλληνικά",Ελληνικά,16:219–22.
  • Kakridis, J.-Th. (1975), "Μήστρα: Zu Hesiods frg. 43a M.–W.",Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik,18:17–25,JSTOR 20180888.
  • Kakridis, J.-Th. (1978a), "Periklymenos: Zu Hesiods frg. 33 M.–W.",Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik,28:173–7,JSTOR 20181504.
  • Kakridis, J.-Th. (1978b), "Pleistheniden oder Atriden? Zu Hesiods frg. 195 M.–W.",Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik,30:1–4,JSTOR 20181585.
  • Kenney, E.J.; Clausen, W.V. (1982),The Cambridge History of Classical Literature: Latin Literature, Cambridge,ISBN 978-0-521-21043-0{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Kirchhoff, A. (1860),"Homerische excurse",Philologus,15 (1–3):1–29,doi:10.1524/phil.1860.15.13.1,S2CID 164689571.
  • Leo, F. (1894), "Hesiodea",Ausgewählte kleine Schriften, vol. ii, Rome, pp. 343–63{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Lightfoot, J.L. (2009),Hellenistic Collection: Philitas, Alexander of Aetolia, Hermesianax, Euphorion, Parthenius, Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, MA,ISBN 978-0-674-99636-6{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Lloyd-Jones, H.; Parsons, P. (1983),Supplementum Hellenisticum, Berlin,ISBN 978-3-11-008171-8{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Lobel, E. (1956),The Oxyrhynchus Papyri: Part XXIII, London{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Lobel, E. (1962),The Oxyrhynchus Papyri: Part XXVIII, London{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Lobel, E. (1964),The Oxyrhynchus Papyri: Part XXX, London{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • López García, A. (1995), "Esiodo, Fr. 193. Riesame diPSI II 131 e nuovi acquisti testuali (PLit.Palau Rib. 21)",Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik,107:53–6,JSTOR 20189548.
  • Lyons, D. (2003), "Dangerous Gifts: Ideologies of Marriage and Exchange in Ancient Greece",Classical Antiquity,22 (1):93–134,doi:10.1525/ca.2003.22.1.93,JSTOR 10.1525/ca.2003.22.1.93.
  • Malten, L. (1911),Kyrene, sagengeschichtliche und historische Untersuchungen, Berlin{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Marquardt, P.A. (1982), "Hesiod's Ambiguous View of Women",Classical Philology,77 (4):283–91,doi:10.1086/366727,JSTOR 269412,S2CID 162865268.
  • March, J. (1987),The Creative Poet: Studies on the Treatment of Myths in Greek Poetry, London,ISBN 978-0-900587-52-8{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • March, J.R. (1988), "Peleus and Achilles in theCatalogue of Women", in B.G. Mandilaras; et al. (eds.),Proceedings of the XVIIIth international Congress of papyrology, Athens 25–31 May 1986, vol. i, Athens, pp. 345–52,ISBN 978-960-85019-0-4{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Marcotte, D. (1988), "Héros divinisés et simulacres dans le catalogue hésiodique des femmes",Antiquité Classique,57: 248‒57.
  • Martin, R.P. (2005), "Pulp Epic: TheCatalogue and theShield", inHunter (2005a), pp. 153–75.
  • McLeod, G. (1991),Virtue and Venom: Catalogs of Women from Antiquity to the Renaissance, Ann Arbor,ISBN 978-0-472-10206-8{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Meliadò, C. (2003), "Un nuovo frammento esiodeo in uno scolio a Teocrito",Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik,145:1–5,JSTOR 20191692.
  • Merkelbach, R. (1951a), "Über zwei epische Papyri",Aegyptus,31:254–60.
  • Merkelbach, R. (1951b), "Zur Einordnung der neuen Fragmente",Aegyptus,31: 268.
  • Merkelbach, R. (1955), "(review ofTraversa (1951))",Gnomon,27:4–6.
  • Merkelbach, R. (1962), "(review ofSchwartz (1960))",Gnomon,34:457–60.
  • Merkelbach, R. (1968a), "Hesiod Fr. 150, 25 M.–W.",Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik,2: 6.
  • Merkelbach, R. (1968b), "Zu Hesiod Fr. 23 und 30 M.–W.",Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik,2: 210.
  • Merkelbach, R. (1968c), "Das Prooemium des hesiodeischen Katalogs",Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik,3:126–33.
  • Merkelbach, R. (1968d), "Hesiod Fr. 43(a)41ff. M.–W.",Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik,3:134–5.
  • Merkelbach, R.; West, M. L. (1965),"The Wedding of Ceyx"(PDF),Rheinisches Museum für Philologie,108 (4):300–17,JSTOR 41244271.
  • Montanari, F.; Rengakos, A.; Tsagalis, C. (2009),Brill's Companion to Hesiod, Leiden,ISBN 978-90-04-17840-3{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Most, G.W., "Two Hesiodic Papyri", inBastianini & Casanova (2008), pp. 55–70.
  • Mureddu, P., "Epiteti femminili nelCatalogo esiodeo", inBastianini & Casanova (2008), pp. 97–112.
  • Nagy, G. (1999),The Best of the Achaeans: Concepts of the Hero in Archaic Greek Poetry (2nd ed.), Baltimore,ISBN 978-0-8018-6015-7, archived fromthe original on 2016-03-03, retrieved2011-11-02{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) (cited by chapter and paragraph numbers which are employed in both the print and on-line editions).
  • Nasta, M. (2006), "La typologie des catalogues d'Éhées: Un réseau généalogique thématisé",Kernos,19:59–78,doi:10.4000/kernos.430 (cited by paragraph of the online edition).
  • O'Callaghan, J. (1996), "Nota paleográfica sobre PLit. Palau Rib. 21",Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik,110:101–2.
  • Ormand, K. (2004), "Marriage, Identity, and the Tale of Mestra in the HesiodicCatalogue of Women",American Journal of Philology,125 (3):303–38,doi:10.1353/ajp.2004.0030,JSTOR 1562169,PMID 21966749,S2CID 36204915.
  • Osborne, R. (2005), "Ordering Women in Hesiod'sCatalogue", inHunter (2005a), pp. 5–24.
  • Pfeiffer, R. (1937),"Hesiodisches und Homerisches",Philologus,92 (1–4):1–18,doi:10.1524/phil.1937.92.14.1,S2CID 164991525.
  • Pontani, F. (2000), "Catullus 64 and the HesiodicCatalogue: A Suggestion",Philologus,144 (2):267–76,doi:10.1524/phil.2000.144.2.267,S2CID 163052183.
  • Powell, J.U. (1925),Collectanea Alexandrina, Oxford{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Reinsch-Werner, H. (1976),Callimachus Hesiodicus: Die Rezeption der hesiodischen Dichtung durch Kallimachos von Kyrene, Berlin{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Reitzenstein, R. (1900), "Die Hochzeit des Peleus und der Thetis",Hermes,35 (1):73–105,JSTOR 4472723.
  • Renner, T. (1978), "A Papyrus Dictionary of Metamorphoses",Harvard Studies in Classical Philology,82:277–93,doi:10.2307/311036,JSTOR 311036.
  • Rutherford, I. (2000), "Formulas, Voice, and Death inEhoie-Poetry, the HesiodicGunaikon Katalogos, and the OdysseianNekuia", in M. Depew;D. Obbink (eds.),Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons, and Society, Cambridge, MA, pp. 81–96,ISBN 978-0-674-00338-5{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Rutherford, I. (2005), "Mestra at Athens: Hesiod fr. 43 and the Poetics of Panhellenism", inHunter (2005a), pp. 99–117.
  • Rutherford, I., "TheCatalogue of Women within the Greek epic tradition: Allusion, Intertextuality and traditional referentiality", inAndersen & Haugh (2011), pp. 152–67.
  • Schmidt, A. (1975), "Zum Prooimion des hesiodeischen Frauenkatalogs",Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft,1:19–31.
  • Schwartz, J. (1960),Pseudo-Hesiodeia: recherches sur la composition, la diffusion et la disparition ancienne d'oeuvres attribuées à Hésiode, Leiden{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Sistakou, E., "Callimachus Hesiodicus Revisited", inMontanari, Rengakos & Tsagalis (2009), pp. 219–52.
  • Solmsen, F. (1981), "The Sacrifice of Agamemnon's Daughter in Hesiod'sEhoeae",American Journal of Philology,102 (4):353–58,doi:10.2307/294322,JSTOR 294322.
  • Solmsen, F. (1982), "The Earliest Stages in Hesiod's Text",Harvard Studies in Classical Philology,86:1–31,doi:10.2307/311181,JSTOR 311181.
  • Stiewe, K. (1960), "Zum Hesiodpapyrus B Merkelbach",Hermes,88 (2):253–6,JSTOR 4475117.
  • Stiewe, K. (1962), "Die Entstehungszeit der hesiodischen Frauenkataloge",Philologus,106 (1–2):291–99,doi:10.1524/phil.1962.106.12.291,S2CID 164444376.
  • Stiewe, K. (1963a), "Die Entstehungszeit der hesiodischen Frauenkataloge (Fortsetzung und Schluss)",Philologus,107:1–29,doi:10.1524/phil.1963.107.12.1,S2CID 201840661.
  • Stiewe, K. (1963b), "(review ofSchwartz (1960))",GGA,215:152–4.
  • Stiewe, K. (1964a), "Ein Nachtrag zum Hesiodpapyrus A Merkelbach",Philologus,108:291–2.
  • Stiewe, K. (1964b), "(review of P.Oxy. XXVIII)",GGA,216:108–14.
  • Treu, M. (1957),"Das Proömium der hesiodischen Frauenkataloge"(PDF),Rheinisches Museum für Philologie,100 (2):169–86,JSTOR 41244044.
  • Uebel, F. (1973), "Literarische Texte unter Ausschluss der christlichen, no. 1275",Archiv für Papyrusforschung,22: 362.
  • Vian, F. (1961), "Poèmes hésiodiques et pseudo-hésiodiques",Revue des Études Grecques,74 (349):269–74,doi:10.3406/reg.1961.3651.
  • West, M. L. (1961), "Hesiodea",Classical Quarterly,11 (3–4):130–45,doi:10.1017/s0009838800015469,S2CID 246875859.
  • West, M. L. (1962a), "Pseudo-Hesiod (review ofSchwartz (1960))",Classical Review,12:17–19,doi:10.1017/S0009840X00212699,S2CID 162780875.
  • West, M. L. (1962b), "More Notes on the Text of Hesiod",Classical Quarterly,12 (2):177–81,doi:10.1017/S0009838800001403,S2CID 170271754.
  • West, M. L. (1963a), "Iolkos in der griechischen Dichtung",Glotta,41:278–82.
  • West, M. L. (1963b), "γλωθρός",Glotta,41:282–5.
  • West, M. L. (1963c), "(review of P.Oxy. XXVIII)",Gnomon,35:752–9.
  • West, M. L. (1966a),Hesiod: Theogony, Oxford,ISBN 978-0-19-814169-3{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • West, M. L. (1966b), "New Fragments of Greek Poetry",Classical Review,16 (1):21–4,doi:10.1017/s0009840x00320182,JSTOR 706514,S2CID 162652916.
  • West, M. L. (1969), "Echoes and Imitations of the Hesiodic Poems",Philologus,113 (1–2):1–9,doi:10.1524/phil.1969.113.12.1,S2CID 164413054.
  • West, M. L. (1970), "Hesiod,Fragmenta, again (response toGiangrande (1970)",Classical Review,20: 416,doi:10.1017/S0009840X00227972,S2CID 246880237.
  • West, M. L. (1973), "Greek Poetry 2000–700 B.C.",Classical Quarterly,23 (2):179–92,doi:10.1017/s0009838800036648,JSTOR 638170,S2CID 170581047.
  • West, M. L. (1978),Hesiod: Works & Days, Oxford,ISBN 978-0-19-814005-4{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • West, M. L. (1983), "The Hesiodic Catalogue: Xouthids and Aiolids",Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik,53:33–6,JSTOR 20183911.
  • West, M. L. (1985a),The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women: Its Nature, Structure, and Origins, Oxford,ISBN 978-0-19-814034-4{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • West, M. L. (1985b), "The Hesiodic Catalogue: New Light on Apollo's Love-Life",Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik,61:1–7,JSTOR 20184321.
  • West, M. L. (1986), "Further Echoes and Imitations of the Hesiodic Poems",Philologus,130 (1–2):1–7,doi:10.1524/phil.1986.130.12.1,S2CID 165031840.
  • West, M. L. (1987), "Iaon",Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik,67: 20.
  • West, M. L. (1988), "The Rise of the Greek Epic",Journal of Hellenic Studies,108:151–72,doi:10.2307/632637,JSTOR 632637,S2CID 162976726.
  • West, M. L. (1999), "The Invention of Homer",Classical Quarterly,49 (2):364–82,doi:10.1093/cq/49.2.364,JSTOR 639863.
  • West, M. L. (2001), "Some Homeric Words",Glotta,77 (1/2):118–35,JSTOR 40262722.
  • West, M. L. (2003),Greek Epic Fragments, Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, MA,ISBN 978-0-674-99605-2{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • West, M. L. (2006a), "(review ofHirschberger (2004))",Gnomon,79:289–94,doi:10.17104/0017-1417_2007_4_289.
  • West, M. L. (2006b), "The Catalogue of Women (review ofHunter (2005a))",Classical Review,56:275–6,doi:10.1017/S0009840X06001442,S2CID 162220135.
  • West, M. L., "The Hesiod Papyri and the Archaic Epic Language", inBastianini & Casanova (2008), pp. 29–42.
  • Wilamowitz-Moellendorf, U. von (1900), "Neue Brüchstucke der Hesiodischen Kataloge",Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften:839–51.
  • Wilamowitz-Moellendorf, U. von (1905), "Lesefrüchte",Hermes,40 (1):116–53,JSTOR 4472979.
  • Ziogas, I. (2011),"Ovid as a Hesiodic Poet: Atalanta in theCatalogue of Women (fr. 72–6 M–W) and theMetamorphoses (10.560–707)",Mnemosyne,64 (2):249–70,doi:10.1163/156852511x505051,S2CID 162338486.
  • Ziogas, I. (2013),Ovid and Hesiod: The Metamorphosis of the Catalogue of Women, Cambridge,ISBN 9781107007413{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  • Zutt, G. (1894), "Über den Katalog der Heroinen in der Nekyia",Beilage zum Programm des grossher-zoglichen Gymnasiums Baden-Baden für das Schuljahr 1893/94, Leipzig{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).

External links

[edit]
Extant poems
Fragmentary poems
Family
Events
Literature
Poems
Plays
Other
Art
Opera
Films
Italian series
Other European
live-action
American films
live-action
Animated films
Television
Comics
Games
Other
International
National
Other
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Catalogue_of_Women&oldid=1335892965"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp