Carol I orCharles I of Romania (bornKarl Eitel Friedrich Zephyrinus Ludwig von Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen; 20 April 1839 – 10 October [O.S. 27 September] 1914), nicknamedthe King ofIndependence (Romanian:Regele Independenței),[1] was the monarch of Romania from 1866 to his death in 1914, ruling asPrince (Domnitor) from 1866 to 1881, and asKing from 1881 to 1914. He was elected Prince of theRomanian United Principalities on 20 April 1866 after the overthrow ofAlexandru Ioan Cuza by a palacecoup d'état. In May 1877, Romania was proclaimed an independent and sovereign nation. The defeat of theOttoman Empire (1878) in theRusso-Turkish War secured Romanian independence, and he was proclaimed King on 26 March [O.S. 14 March] 1881. He was the first ruler of theHohenzollern-Sigmaringen dynasty, which ruled the country until the proclamation of asocialist republic in 1947.
During his reign, Carol I personally led Romanian troops during the Russo-Turkish War and assumed command of the Russo-Romanian army during thesiege of Plevna. The country achieved internationally recognized independence via theTreaty of Berlin, 1878 and acquiredSouthern Dobruja fromBulgaria in 1913. In 1883 the king entered a top-secret military alliance with theAustro-Hungarian Empire, despite popular demands againstHungary. When World War I broke out he was unable to activate the alliance. Romania remained neutral and in 1916 joined theAllies.
Domestic political life was organized around the rivalLiberal andConservative parties. During Carol's reign, Romania's industry and infrastructure were much improved, however this process also resulted in major scandals, including theStrousberg Affair which personally implicated Carol. Overall, the country still had anagrarian-focused economy and the situation of the peasantry failed to improve, leading to amajor revolt in 1907, bloodily suppressed by the authorities.
He married PrincessElisabeth of Wied on 15 November 1869. They only had one daughter,Maria, who died at the age of four. Carol never produced a male heir, leaving his elder brotherLeopold next in line to the throne. In October 1880 Leopold renounced his right of succession in favour of his sonWilliam, who in turn surrendered his claim six years later in favour of his younger brother, the futureKing Ferdinand.
Prince Karl Eitel Friedrich Zephyrinus Ludwig of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen was born on 20 April 1839 inSigmaringen, in the Catholic branch of the family.[2] He was the second son ofPrince Karl Anton of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen and his wife,Princess Josephine of Baden.[3] After finishing his elementary studies, Karl entered the Cadet School inMünster. In 1857 he was attending the courses of the Artillery School inBerlin.[4] Up to 1866, when he accepted the crown of Romania, he was a Prussian officer.[5] He took part in theSecond Schleswig War, including the assault of theFredericia citadel andDybbøl, an experience which would be very useful to him later in theRusso-Turkish war.[6]
Although he was quite frail and not very tall, prince Karl was reported to be the perfect soldier, healthy and disciplined, and also a very good politician with liberal ideas. He was familiar with several European languages.[4] His family was closely related to theBonaparte family (one of his grandmothers was aBeauharnais, Joséphine's niece-in-law, and the other a Murat,Joachim's nieceMarie Antoinette Murat), and they enjoyed very good relations withNapoleon III of France.[3]
The former Domnitor (ruling prince) of united Romania,Alexandru Ioan Cuza, had been expelled from the country by the leading noblemen, leaving Romania in political chaos. Cuza's double election seven years earlier, both inWallachia and inMoldavia, had been the basis on which theRomanian Principalities' unification was recognized by the European powers. With him gone, the country was in danger of disintegration, as the Ottoman Empire and other powers initially accepted the unification only on the condition that it would end with his reign.[7][8]
Prince Karl of Hohenzollern Sigmaringen
As Romanian politicians searched for a successor, Karl was not their first choice. The authors of the anti-Cuza coup first approachedPhilip of Flanders, brother of kingLeopold II of Belgium, hoping that he would bring the institutions of his country to theLower Danube and turn the newly unified country into a "Belgium of the East".[9][10] Wary of France's oppositions, Philip, who also turned down the throne of Greece a few years earlier, refused.[11]
Soon after, Napoleon III suggested Karl, who was the brother in law of Philip. Napoleon's recommendation weighed heavily with Romanian politicians of the time, since Romania was strongly influenced by French culture. Napoleon was a strong supporter of Romanian independence, hoping to consolidate French influence on the Black Sea.[12][13] Another factor was Karl's blood relation to the ruling Prussian family.Ion Brătianu was the Romanian politician sent to negotiate with Karl and his family the possibility of installing him on the Romanian throne.[14]
Due to the political conflict betweenPrussia and theAustrian Empire, Karl travelled incognito by railroad fromDüsseldorf toBaziaș, through Switzerland. He received there a Swiss passport from a Swiss public clerk, friend of his family, under the name of Karl Hettingen.[2][15] From Baziaș he travelled by boat toTurnu Severin, since there was no railroad to Romania. As he crossed the border onto Romanian soil, he was met by Brătianu, who bowed before him and asked Karl to join him in his carriage.[16] He was formally elected Domnitor on 20 April.
On 10 May 1866 (22 May 1866N.S.), Karl entered the capital ofBucharest. The news of his arrival had been transmitted by telegraph and he was welcomed by a huge crowd eager to see the new ruler. InBăneasa he was given the keys to the capital city. It was a rainy day after a long period of drought, which was taken to be a good omen by locals.[17] As he was crowned, Karl swore this oath: "I swear to guard the laws of Romania, to maintain the rights of its People and the integrity of its territory." He took this oath inFrench, as he did not yet speak Romanian.[16][18] In fact, it is said that, before his nomination as Domnitor, he had never heard of Romania.[19] However, he endeared himself to his adopted country by adopting the Romanian spelling of his name, Carol. He learned to speak Romanian not long after that.[18]
On 29 June – two months after Carol's arrival – the Romanian parliament adopted the1866 Constitution of Romania, one of the most modern constitutions of its time. Carol signed it into law two days later. Modeled closely on theConstitution of Belgium, it guaranteed private propriety, freedom of speech, total freedom of the press, it abolished the death penalty during peace time, and establishedseparation of powers.[21][22] Despite the otherwise liberal nature of the act, the constitution barred non-Christians from becoming citizens, a measure which heavily affected the country's Jewish population[6][23][24]
This constitution allowed the development and modernization of the Romanian state. In a daring move, the Constitution chose to ignore the nominal suzerainty of theOttoman Empire, which paved the way towardsde jure independence.[23]
Anti-dynasty cartoon, published inGhimpele, 1872. Left panel: Alexandru Ioan Cuza betrayed byIon Brătianu; right panel: Carol I, supported byOtto von Bismarck and Brătianu, feeding offGerman influence and economic privilege
Article 82 made the throne a hereditary office of Carol's descendants "on the male line through the right of first-born,perpetually excluding women and their descendants."[25] It also required that Carol's descendants be "raised in the Eastern Orthodox Religion."[24][26] Although Carol was vested with executive power, he was not politically responsible for exercising it. His acts were only valid if they were countersigned by a minister, who then became responsible for the act in question. Nevertheless, he commanded greatmoral authority as a symbol of the nation and its unity.[27]
While Romania did not take part in theFranco-Prussian War of 1870–1871, the conflict nonetheless affected the early reign of Carol I. Since he was a German prince ruling a historicallyFrancophile country, there was a strong feeling of distrust towards Carol during the time, who was not yet seen as Romanian.[5][28][29] Several attempts to force the prince to abdicate took place around this time, usually led by the republicans and radical liberals led byIon C. Brătianu andC. A. Rosetti.[30][31] Carol's alliance with the Conservatives which effectively blocked the Liberals out of government did little to quell Liberal animosity towards the prince.[32]
The most well known such incident took place on 8 August 1870, when radical liberals in the city ofPloiești started a revolt and attempted coup by arresting the chief of police and the county Prefect, occupying several official buildings and proclaiming the so-calledRepublic of Ploiești. The revolt lasted less than 24 hours and lead to the arrest of many Liberal leaders.[28][32]
Future republican projects were rare, especially since Brătianu became prime minister in 1876 and helped Liberals hold power until 1889, becoming loyal supporters of King Carol.[32][33]
Between 1875 and 1877 anti-Ottoman revolts took place in several Balkan countries, most notablyBulgaria, where the April Uprisings of 1876 were brutally suppressed by irregularbashi-bazouks. The international outrage at the Bulgarian massacre – particularly on the part of Russia, who saw itself as a protector of Orthodox Christians in general and Bulgarians in particular – triggered several diplomatic efforts over the next year. After the failure of these diplomatic attempts, Russia declared war on the Ottoman Empire on 24 April 1877, launching theRusso-Turkish War, which is known in Romanian historiography asthe War of Independence.[28][34]
At the behest of then foreign ministerMihail Kogălniceanu and against the advice of his Crown Council, Carol decided to permit Russian troops to pass through its territory on the way to Bulgaria. This resulted in Turkish bombardments of Romanian towns on the Danube. At this point, Romania wasde facto independent, being "bound to the Ottoman Empire only by the payment of tribute (which had dropped to 1% of the country's budget) and a number of largely formal prerogatives in matters of foreign policy."[35]
On May 10, 1877, Romania declared its independence, ending thelegal fiction of Ottoman suzerainty that had existed since 1861. The declaration was put forward and voted on by the Parliament andpromulgated by Prince Carol.[36]
Romanian troops returning to Bucharest after the war, 8 October 1878
While Russia was happy to be given travelling rights inside Romanian territory, it vehemently opposed Romania actively entering the war, as this would have given them a place at the negotiation table after the war. However, after the Russian advance was halted outside the Bulgarian town of Pleven, they requested the Romanian army's urgent intervention. Carol obtained the command of the combined Russian and Romanian forces that weresurrounding Pleven and following heavy fighting and a prolonged siege,Osman Nuri Pasha surrendered the town on 28 November 1877. This victory sent ripples within Romanian society, elevating Carol's name among the pantheon of national heroes.[35]
The Romanian army, under Carol, continued to fight in the war, most notably the battles of Smârdan and Vidin.[37] By early 1878, the Turks were losing the war and on the third of March they signed theTreaty of San Stefano, which recognized the independence of Romania, Serbia, Montenegro and the autonomy of Bulgaria.[38][39]
After the war, theTreaty of Berlin recognized Romania as an independent country on 13 July 1878. In addition, Romania was granted the former Ottoman territory ofNorthern Dobruja, an immensely valuable territorial gain that gave Romania possession of themouth of the Danube and access to the Black Sea.[35][40] From 1878, Carol held the title of Royal Highness (Alteță Regală).
The war had also made possible the appearance of thePrincipality of Bulgaria. This young state began a search for a new prince, and Carol I was among the candidates, although he was not elected.[41]
Romania and its surroundings in 1878, after theTreaty of Berlin and the international recognition of Romania's independence.
On 15 March 1881, the constitution was amended toproclaim Romania a kingdom. Carol became the firstKing of Romania, while the heir-apparent or heir-presumptive would be called Prince Royal. On 10 May, Carol was crowned king. The 1866 Constitution was retained, with the word "prince" replaced by the word "king".[42][43]
TheSteel Crown that was used in the coronation of Carol was forged from steel of a melted Ottoman cannon that was captured by the Romanian Army at the Pleven.[44][45] Since 2016 it is depicted on theRomanian coat of arms.[46]
TheAnghel Saligny Bridge (known as King Carol I Bridge during the monarchy) crossing the Danube.
King Carol was a cold man who was always focused on the prestige of the dynasty he had founded. His wife, Elizabeth, claimed he 'wore the crown in his sleep'.[47] He was very meticulous and he tried to impose his style upon everyone that surrounded him. Though he was devoted to his job as Romania's ruler, he never forgot his German roots. In 48 years of rule—the longest in Romanian history—he helped Romania gain its independence, raised its prestige, helped redress its economy and established a dynasty. In the Carpathian mountains, he builtPeleș Castle in German style, which is considered one of Europe's most beautiful castles and is still one of Romania's most visited landmarks.[48] After theRusso-Turkish War, Romania gainedNorthern Dobruja and Carol ordered Romanian engineerAnghel Saligny (a competitor and friend ofGustave Eiffel) to build the first contemporary permanentbridge over theDanube, betweenFetești andCernavodă, linking the newly acquired province to the rest of the country.[49][50] The bridge was, at that time, the longest in Europe and, although no longer in use, it is still intact as of 2023.[14][51]
The king's personal authority in military and foreign policy issues was unquestioned. In 1883 he entered into a crucial alliance with theCentral Powers, which he personally arranged without discussion in Parliament or with anyone outside a handful of insiders. Upon its renewal in 1892, he had to inform his prime minister and foreign minister, but Parliament and the public at large did not even know about its existence until the beginning ofWorld War I.[52][53]
On 22 June 1884, the Parliament voted in favour of granting Carol and his successors a large royal estate, making the king the biggest landowner in the country.[54]
Domnitor Carol with his wife and their only daughter (1873)
His reign established constitutional monarchy and saw the early days of democracy in Romania, despite the fact that elections of that era are largely seen as being controlled. Although the framers of the Constitution intended to vest most of the power in Parliament, the King exercised considerable influence on the electoral process. He would essentially alternate power between the two parties, installing the opposition whenever he felt the ruling party of the day had run its course. The new government would organize elections which they would invariably win.[35][55] This resulted in a situation where Parliament reflected the will of the government, not vice versa as is the case in a true parliamentary democracy.
Between 1886 and 1887, there was a new proposal to make Carol I the ruler of Bulgaria. He was strongly supported byStefan Stambolov,regent of the country after the abdication of the Bulgarian princeAlexander of Battenberg. Stambolov's intention was to establisha personal union between Bulgaria and Romania. Carol I was interested in the offer, but had to reject it under Russian pressure.[41]
In 1913 Romania intervened in theSecond Balkan War and invaded Bulgaria. The approach of Romanian troops towards Sofia determined the Bulgarians to negotiate an armistice which resulted in theTreaty of Bucharest, which gained Romania the territory ofSouthern Dobruja, expanding the territory obtained by the country under King Carol and confirming Romania's dominant role in the region.[56][57]
The long rule of Carol helped the quick development of the Romanian state. Towards the end of his reign and the start ofWorld War I, Carol wanted to enter the war on the side of theCentral Powers; however, Romanian public opinion was overwhelmingly Francophile and sided with theTriple Entente. Carol had signed a secret treaty in 1883 which had linked Romania with theTriple Alliance. Although the treaty was to be activated only if Russia attacked one of the signatories, Carol was convinced that the honourable thing to do was to enter the war supporting theGerman Empire and his cousin, KaiserWilhelm II.[22][58]
On 3 August [O.S. 21 July] 1914, an emergency meeting was held with theCrown Council, where Carol told them about the secret treaty and shared his opinion with them. However, most of the Crown Council members strongly disagreed, opting for neutrality, with prime-ministerBrătianu being a particularly strong voice for preserving the peace obtained by the Treaty of Bucharest.[59]
King Carol died on 10 October [O.S. 27 September] 1914. The new king, Ferdinand (under the influence of his wife,Marie of Edinburgh, a British princess), was more willing to listen to public opinion and brought Romania into the war on the side of the Allies in 1916.[59][60]
King Carol I of Romania with his nephew (Ferdinand) and grand-nephew (Carol). Circa 1905.
When he was elected prince of Romania, Carol was unmarried. In 1869, the prince started a trip around Europe and mainly Germany, to find a bride. During this trip he met and married PrincessElizabeth of Wied atNeuwied on 15 November 1869. Their marriage was strange, with Carol being a cold and calculating man while Elizabeth was a notorious dreamer who published literature under the name of Carmen Sylva.[13][61] They had one child,Princess Maria, born in 1870, who died 9 April (N.S.) 1874.[62] She had no prospect of inheriting her father's throne; as mentioned above, the Constitution limited succession to the male line. This led to the further estrangement of the royal couple, Elizabeth never completely recovering from the trauma of losing her only child.[13]
After the proclamation of the Kingdom (1881), the succession was a very important matter of state. Since Carol's brother,Leopold (in 1880), and his oldest son,William (in 1886), declined their rights, the second son of Leopold,Ferdinand, was named prince of Romania andheir-presumptive to the throne, in 1886.[63]
Towards the end of Carol's life Carol and Elizabeth finally found a way to understand each other and were reported to have become good friends.[13]
Carol died on 10 October [O.S. 27 September] 1914, at the age of 75 years old.[64]
Carol I is seen as a towering figure of national history in contemporary Romania. He is often depicted in history books as a historical leader on par withDecebalus,Stephen the Great,Michael the Brave orAlexandru Ioan Cuza.[65] This view emerged during the second half of his reign, with the founding of theconstitutional monarchy and the victory in the War of Independence making Carol a legendary personage in his own lifetime, according to historianLucian Boia:
His long reign (of forty-eight years, one more than Stephen the Great) allowed the myth to come to fruition even within his lifetime. The image of the sovereign, mediocre at first, took on a powerful brilliance in the last years of the century. An educational poster of around 1900 presents "the four pillars of the Romanian people", along with other heroes of Wallachian history. The four areTrajan and Decebalus, Cuza and Carol I. Even Michael the Brave becomes a secondary figure by comparison. Carol appears organically rooted in Romanian history; he represents a new beginning, of course, but a beginning based on much older foundations.[65]
Fountain in the palace of the Romanian King, Carol I of Romania, in Sinaia. 1907
During the Communist era, Carol became a target of scorn for Romanian historians, as were all other figures associated with the monarchy. He was often described as a money-hungry foreign prince who was placed on the throne by Western capitalists in order to tighten their control over the Romanian state, no more than a simple pawn of theKaiser, who needed someone that blindly followed his orders to rule over thelower Danube. Additionally, he was depicted as an enemy of the peasantry, who tried to steal their lands and rape young peasant girls. He was usually indicated as the sole source of outrage during the1907 Peasant Revolt.[66][67][68] Starting with the second half of the 1970s, Carol's image was rehabilitated to some extent by Romanian historians, who distanced themselves from the more propagandistic views of the last three decades. While more mainstream publications, such as school text books, continued the anti-monarchy line, some academics began describing his reign as a period of national progress and acknowledged his role in preserving the youngUnion.[68]
Following thecollapse of Communism in 1989, the monarchy was fully rehabilitated in the public eyes. Carol is now thought of as a figure of national unity who is seen as the founder of the modern Romanian state and one of the most revered individuals in the country's history.[11][69][70] During the100 Greatest Romanians show broadcast by thenational television in 2006, Carol I was voted the second greatest Romanian who has ever lived, after only Stephen the Great.[71]
^abBuenviaje, Dino E. (2014)."Carol I, King of Romania". In Tucker, Spencer C. (ed.).World War I: The Definitive Encyclopedia and Document Collection [5 volumes]: The Definitive Encyclopedia and Document Collection. Santa Barbara, Ca, Denver, CO and Oxford: ABC-CLIO. pp. 350–351.ISBN9781851099658.
^abHitchins, Keith (2011).Ionel Brătianu: Romania. Makers of the Modern World: The Peace Conferences of 1919–23 and their Aftermath. London: Haus Publishing.ISBN9781907822186.
^Neacșu, Dana (2014)."Romania". In Gaebler, Ralph; Shea, Alison (eds.).Sources of State Practice in International Law (2nd rev. ed.). Leiden & Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. p. 406.ISBN9789004272224.
^Ivanyi, Miklos; Băncilă, Radu (2014)."Twenty Years Devoted to International Conferences on Bridges Across Danube". In Petzek, Edward; Băncilă, Radu (eds.).The Eight International Conference "Bridges in Danube Basin": New Trends in Bridge Engineering and Efficient Solutions for Large and Medium Span Bridges. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media. p. 13.ISBN9783658037147.
^Fierbințeanu, Virgil; Teodorescu, Dragoș; Băncilă, Radu (1999)."Seismic Behaviour of the Romanian Danube Bridges". In Dubină, Dan; Iványi, Miklós (eds.).Stability and Ductility of Steel Structures: Proceedings of the 6th International Colloquium (SDSS'99). Amsterdam, Lausanne, New York, Oxford, Shannon, Singapore, Tokyo: Elsevier. p. 592.ISBN9780080552927.
^abHall, Richard C. (2003)."Bulgaria, Romania, and Greece". In Hamilton, Richard F.; Herwig, Holger H. (eds.).Decisions for War, 1914–1917. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. p. 401.ISBN9780521545303.