Carl Friedrich Freiherr von Weizsäcker[a] (German:[kaʁlˈfʁiːdʁɪçfɔnˈvaɪtsɛkɐ]ⓘ; 28 June 1912 – 28 April 2007) was a Germanphysicist andphilosopher. He was the longest-living member of the team which performed nuclear research inNazi Germany during theSecond World War, underWerner Heisenberg's leadership. There is ongoing debate as to whether or not he and the other members of the team actively and willingly pursued the development of a nuclear bomb for Germany during this time.
Weizsäcker made important theoretical discoveries regarding energy production in stars fromnuclear fusion processes. He also did influential theoretical work on planetary formation in the earlySolar System.
In his late career, he focused more on philosophical, ethical and historical issues, and was awarded several international honours for his work in those areas.
Born inKiel,Schleswig-Holstein, he was the grandson ofKarl Hugo von Weizsäcker, the Prime Minister of theKingdom of Württemberg. His grandfather was ennobled in 1897 and raised to the hereditary nobility with the title of Baron (Freiherr) in 1916. As such, the four-year-old Carl Friedrich Weizsäcker became Baron Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker. Since 1919, noble titles have legally been considered parts of the family name.
Weizsäcker's special interests as a young researcher were the nuclear processes in stars and thebinding energy ofatomic nuclei. Together withHans Bethe he found a mechanism or pathway for the cyclic process offusion in stars (Bethe–Weizsäcker process, published 1937–1939).[1][2][3] This discovery should not be confused with his earlier (1935) development of theBethe–Weizsäcker formula, or Semi-Empirical Mass Formula (SEMF), which was a theoretical formula relating the curve ofnuclear binding energy, nuclear masses, and certain other nuclear properties.[4]
In 1938, Weizsäcker developed a theory on theformation of the Solar System, based on considerations regarding the unequal share of lighter and heavierelements in theSun and theSolar System'sterrestrial planets. His views were later generally acknowledged and refined by a large number of other physicists and astronomers. According to the theory, the Sun and itsplanets evolved from a gas cloud made up of 99%hydrogen andhelium, and 1% of heavier elements. Some 10% of the cloud remained around the Sun as an extensiveatmosphere during an initial phase, and the 1% of heavier elements within this 10% of the total mass of the cloud would tally with the fraction of roughly 1% that the planets contribute to the mass of the Solar System today.
The theory also helped to explain the empirically observed regular pattern of increase in the diameters of theorbits of the planets of the Solar System, from inward to outward. This result was a natural outcome of the increasing size of "planetary eddies" of gas and dust farther from the centre of the early solar system.
A further implication of his theory was that manystars out in the universe, with characteristics similar to the Sun, would have to be expected to possessplanetary systems similar to our own.[5]
Afternuclear fission became known in early 1939 through the work ofOtto Hahn andLise Meitner, Weizsäcker (and by his own estimate, 200 other physicists) quickly recognised thatnuclear weapons could potentially be built. He discussed the upsetting implications in February 1939 with philosopher friend Georg Max Friedrich Valentin Picht (1913–1982).[7]
As a protégé ofWerner Heisenberg, Weizsäcker was present at a crucial meeting at the Army Ordnance headquarters in Berlin on 17 September 1939, at which the German atomic weapons program was launched.[9] Early in the war — possibly until 1942 — he hoped a successful nuclear weapons project would earn him political influence.[10] In July 1940 he was co-author of a report to the army on the possibility of "energy production" from refineduranium. The report also predicted the possibility of usingplutonium for the same purpose including the production of a new type of explosives.[11] During summer 1942 Weizsäcker filed a patent on a transportable "process to generate energy and neutrons by an explosion... e.g. a bomb". The patent application was found in the 1990s inMoscow.
Historians have been divided as to whether Heisenberg and his team were sincerely trying to construct a nuclear weapon, or whether their failure reflected a desire not to succeed because they did not want the Nazi regime to have such a weapon. This latter view, largely based on postwar interviews with Heisenberg and Weizsäcker, was put forward byRobert Jungk in his 1957 bookBrighter Than a Thousand Suns. In a 1957 interview with the German weeklyDer Spiegel, Weizsäcker frankly admitted to the scientific ambitions of those years "We wanted to know if chain reactions were possible. No matter what we would end up doing with our knowledge – we wanted to know."[12] Only by "divine grace", Weizsäcker said, were they spared the temptation to build the bomb as the German war economy was unable to mobilize the necessary resources.
Original sources about this question were not revealed until 1993, when transcripts of secretly recorded conversations among ten top German physicists, including Heisenberg and Weizsäcker, detained underOperation Epsilon atFarm Hall, nearCambridge in late 1945, were published. In the conversation after the group of detainees had listened to theBBC Radio news on dropping of the atomic bomb on 6 August 1945, Weizsäcker said: "I believe the reason we didn't do it was because all the physicists didn't want to do it, on principle. If we had wanted Germany to win the war we would have succeeded!"[13]
But the "Farm Hall Transcripts" also revealed that Weizsäcker had taken the lead in arguing for an agreement among the scientists that they would claim that they had never wanted to develop a German nuclear weapon. It was this version of events which was given to Jungk as the basis of his book. This story was untrue at least to the extent that the detainees also included scientists actively engaged in eager attempts to build a nuclear bomb, namelyKurt Diebner andWalther Gerlach.[14]Max von Laue later called this agreement "die Lesart" (the Version).[15] Although the memorandum which the scientists drew up was drafted by Heisenberg, von Laue wrote: "The leader in all these discussions was Weizsäcker. I did not hear any mention of any ethical point of view."[16]
Weizsäcker himself stated that Heisenberg,Karl Wirtz and he had a private agreement to study nuclear fission to the fullest possible extent in order to "decide" themselves how to proceed with its technical application. "There was no conspiracy, not even in our small three-man-circle, with certainty not to make the bomb. Just as little, there was no passion to make the bomb..."[17] In a recent report based on additional documents from Russian archives, historian Mark Walker concludes that "in comparison with Diebner [and] Gerlach ... Heisenberg and finally Weizsäcker did obviously not use all power they commanded to provide the National Socialists with nuclear weapons".[18]
However, historian of science and technologyWolf Schäfer has concluded, that Weizsäcker did want to build the bomb for Hitler. In a detailed study about Weizsäcker’s contributions to both Nazi Germany and West Germany, he distinguished between the young and the older (pacifistic) Weizsäcker, that is, the person he was from 1939 to 1945, and the person he became thereafter.[19]
The young von Weizsäcker was no clairvoyant; he expected a German victory and wanted to offer Hitler the superweapon to guarantee Germany's supremacy, not to prevent the dictator's suicide and the devastation of the country. What von Weizsäcker foresaw in 1941 was Germany's emergence as the world's first nuclear power. Thehighly talented Hitler would jump at this, he thought. The power of the atomic bomb would enable the dictator, who had already conquered Western Europe, to keep the "Anglo-Saxons" in check (USA), or rather bring them to their knees (Great Britain), and to colonize Russia. We can assume that thepolicy of peace, which the young von Weizsäcker wanted to discuss with Hitler, was the reorganization of Europe under German domination.
Ivan Supek (one of Heisenberg's students and friends) claimed[20] that Weizsäcker was the main figure behind the famous and controversialHeisenberg–Bohr meeting inCopenhagen in September 1941. Allegedly, he tried to persuade Bohr to mediate for peace between Germany and Great Britain. According to Weizsäcker's own account, he had persuaded Heisenberg to meet Bohr in order to broker an accord of the international nuclear physicist "community" not to build the bomb.[21] However, according to Bohr's (posthumously published) account of the events, Heisenberg enthusiastically promoted the prospect of German victory and wanted Bohr and his colleagues to assist in the German atomic program.[22]
Later during the war Weizsäcker worked as a professor at theReichsuniversität Straßburg. The American capture of his laboratory and papers there in December 1944 revealed to the Western Allies that the Germans had not come close to developing a nuclear weapon.[23]
He was one of the eight signatories of theMemorandum of Tübingen which called for the recognition of theOder–Neiße line as the official border between Germany and Poland and spoke against a possible nuclear armament ofWest Germany.[27][28]
In the 1970s he founded, together with the Indian philosopherPandit Gopi Krishna, a research foundation "for western sciences and eastern wisdom". After his retirement in 1980 he became aChristian pacifist, and intensified his work on the conceptual definition of quantum physics, particularly on theCopenhagen interpretation.
His experiences in the Nazi era, and with his own behavior in that time, gave Weizsäcker an interest in questions of ethics and responsibility. In 1957, he was one of theGöttinger 18, a group of prominent German physicists who protested against the idea that theBundeswehr (West German armed forces) should be equipped withtactical nuclear weapons. He further suggested thatWest Germany should declare its definitive abdication of all kinds of nuclear weapons.[29]
In 2007, Weizsäcker died at the age of 94 inSöcking near Starnberg.[30] Opinions are split on the question of whether he accepted his share of responsibility for the German scientific community's efforts to build a nuclear weapon for Nazi Germany.[31] Schäfer documented Weizsäcker’s lifelong connection with the philosopherMartin Heidegger and has argued that he shared the philosopher’s hope for an “utopian”National Socialism.[32]
Weizsäcker developed the theory of ur-alternatives (archetypal objects), publicized in his bookEinheit der Natur (published in English asThe Unity of Nature)[33] and further developed through the 1990s.[34][35] The theoryaxiomatically constructsquantum physics from the distinction between empirically observable, binary alternatives. Weizsäcker used his theory to derive the 3-dimensionality of space[citation needed] and to estimate theentropy of aproton falling into ablack hole.
Weizsäcker was nominated four times[37] for the Nobel Prize in Physics.[38]Since 2009, the Donors' Association for German Science and the Leopoldina makes a biennial award of €50,000 "Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker Award" for "outstanding scientific contribution to resolving socially important problems". There is a Carl-Friedrich von Weizsäcker Foundation, knowledge and responsibility – Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker-Gesellschaft eV.
translationThe Ambivalence of progress, essays on historical anthropology, New York 1988 (ISBN0-913729-92-2)
Deutlichkeit: Beiträge zu politischen und religiösen Gegenwartsfragen, Hanser, München, 1978, 1979 (ISBN3-446-12623-6).
The Biological Basis of Religion and Genius,Gopi Krishna, New York, intro. by Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker, which is half the book, 1971, 1972 (ISBN0-06-064788-4)
^Regarding personal names:Freiherr is a former title (translated as'Baron'). In Germany since 1919, it forms part of family names. The feminine forms areFreifrau andFreiin.
^C.F. von Weizsäcker (1937) "Über Elementumwandlungen im Innern der Sterne. I" (On transformations of elements in the interiors of stars. I),Physikalische Zeitschrift (Physics Journal), vol. 38, pages 176–191.
^C.F. von Weizsäcker (1938) "Über Elementumwandlungen im Innern der Sterne. II" (On transformations of elements in the interiors of stars. II),Physikalische Zeitschrift, vol. 39, pages 633–646.
^Hans A. Bethe (1939) "Energy production in stars",Physical Review, vol. 55, pages 434–456.
^Zur Theorie der Kernmassen (On the theory of nuclear masses); in: Zeitschrift für Physik (Journal of Physics)96 (1935) pages 431–458
^Heinz Haber:Unser blauer Planet [Our blue planet] (1965; in German); "Die Entstehung der Erde" [The formation of the Earth], Rororo pocket edition atRowohlt, Reinbek near Hamburg 1967, pp. 19–23
^Gamow, G.; Hynek, J. A. (1 March 1945). "A New Theory by C. F. Von Weizsacker of the Origin of the Planetary System".The Astrophysical Journal.101: 249.Bibcode:1945ApJ...101..249G.doi:10.1086/144711.
^von Weizsäcker, Carl Friedrich (1977). "Selbstdarstellung (Self-manifestation)".Der Garten des Menschlichen. Beiträge zur geschichtlichen Anthropologie [The garden of the human ones. Contributions to historical anthropology] (in German). p. 568.
^Der Spiegel, "...und führe uns nicht in Versuchung: Vom gespaltenen Atom zum gespaltenen Gewissen – Die Geschichte einer menschheitsgefährdenden Waffe (...and do not lead us into temptation: From the split atom to the split conscience – the history of a mankind-endangering weapon)", vol. 11(19) (Mai 8, 1957), p. 52
^Wolf Schäfer: "Plutoniumbombe und zivile Atomkraft: Carl Friedrich von Weizsäckers Beiträge zum Dritten Reich und zur Bundesrepublik." In:Leviathan. Berliner Zeitschrift für Sozialwissenschaft, vol. 41, no. 3, 2013, p. 383–421 (PDF). The following quote from p. 408 is translated from German.
^For further discussion of this and other controversial issues around C.F. v. Weizsäcker see Klaus Hentschel and Dieter Hoffmann (eds.) Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker – Physik, Philosophie, Friedensforschung, Stuttgart: Wiss. Verlagsgesellschaft 2014.
^Wolf Schäfer: "Der „utopische“ Nationalsozialismus – Ein gemeinsamer Fluchtpunkt im Denken von Martin Heidegger und Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker?" In:Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker: Physik, Philosophie, Friedensforschung (Acta Historica Leopoldina, vol. 63). Ed. byKlaus Hentschel andDieter Hoffmann, Stuttgart, Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, 2014, p. 503–524.
^Michael Schaaf:Weizsäckers Beiträge zur Kernphysik in: Josef Makovitzky und László Imre Komlosi:Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker: Physiker, Philosoph, Humanist. Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, 2019,ISBN978-3-00-062340-0, p. 19-28
^For more details about the nominations of Bethe and Weizsäcker see: Michael Schaaf:Weizsäcker, Bethe und der Nobelpreis, Acta Historica Leopoldina, No. 63 (2014), p. 145-156
Powers, Thomas, "The Private Heisenberg and the Absent Bomb" (review of Werner and Elisabeth Heisenberg,My Dear Li: Correspondence, 1937–1946, edited by Anna Maria Hirsch-Heisenberg and translated from the German by Irene Heisenberg, Yale University Press, 312 pp., $40.00),The New York Review of Books, vol. LXIII, no. 20 (December 22, 2016, pp. 65–67. "[Werner] Heisenberg, Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker, and...Karl Wirtz [during World War II led] an effort [to prevent] a complete shutdown [of work toward a German atom bomb], which would condemn young physicists to military service... or takeover by Nazi extremists who might think an atomic bomb could still give Hitler a complete victory." (p. 66.) Desiring on ethical grounds to prevent the introduction of nuclear weapons into the world, the key German nuclear physicists "'agreed... not to deny [the feasibility of] an atomic bomb, but... to [argue] that it could not be implemented within a realistic time frame...'" (p. 67.)
"Foreword" by C. F. von Weizäcker inSteven James Bartlett, Critique of Impure Reason: Horizons of Possibility and Meaning, Studies in Theory and Behavior, 2021,ISBN978-0-578-88646-6, pp. xxxiii–xxxiv.