Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Canon 1324

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Catholic Church law
Scale of justice
Part ofa series on the
Canon law of the Catholic Church
Jus antiquum (c. 33–1140)
Jus novum (c. 1140–1563)
Jus novissimum (c. 1563–1918)
Jus codicis (1918-present)
Other
Sacraments
Sacramentals
Sacred places
Sacred times
Supreme authority,particular churches, and canonical structures
Supreme authority of the Church
Supra-diocesan/eparchal structures
Particular churches
Juridic persons
Procedural law
Pars statica (tribunals & ministers/parties)
Pars dynamica (trial procedure)
Canonization
Election of the Roman Pontiff
iconCatholicism portal

Canon 1324 is acanon of the1983Code of Canon Law that enumerates situations according to which penalties prescribed incanon law must be diminished or replaced by apenance. The canon does not automatically remove the penalty completely except in cases oflatae sententiae (automatic)excommunication.[1]

Cases to which the canon applies

[edit]

The diminution or replacement of the penalty must be applied if the offence was committed by:[1]

  1. Someone with imperfect use of reason
  2. Someone temporarily lacking the use of reason because of drunkenness or some similar mental disturbance
  3. Someone who, while not altogether losing the use of reason, acts in the heat of passion, without having deliberately provoked that passion
  4. Someone not yet sixteen years old
  5. Someone who acts out of grave fear, necessity or serious inconvenience when the act is intrinsically evil or tends to harm souls (if the act committed in these circumstances is not intrinsically evil or harmful to souls, then there is no penalty)
  6. Someone who acts in lawful self-defence but without due moderation (if due moderation was used, then there is no penalty)
  7. Someone who reacts against grave and unjust provocation by another
  8. Someone who erroneously but culpably thought the circumstances mentioned in parentheses above under numbers 5 and 6 existed, circumstances that according to canon 1323 exempt from all penalty
  9. Someone who was inculpably unaware that a penalty was attached to the law or precept against which he offended
  10. Someone who acted with grave but not full imputability

In the circumstances listed abovelatae sententiae (automatic)excommunications do not apply.

A judge may diminish or replace a prescribed penalty also in view of other circumstances that reduce the gravity of the offence.

Claimed applications

[edit]

Excommunication of Marcel Lefebvre

[edit]

TheSSPX argues thatMarcel Lefebvre's ordination of four bishops on 30 June 1988 (theEcône consecrations) in contravention of a direct order fromPope John Paul II, was due to a state of necessity, citing in his defense canons 1323 and 1324 of the1983Code of Canon Law.[2]

Abortion on a minor in Brazil

[edit]
Main article:2009 Brazilian girl abortion case

In March 2009, after an abortion on a nine-year-old girl raped by her stepfather and pregnant with twins had been performed to save her life, ArchbishopJosé Cardoso Sobrinho ofOlinda and Recife stated thatlatae sententiaeexcommunication had been incurred by the girl's mother and the medical team. TheNational Conference of Bishops of Brazil disowned his statement, saying that, in accordance withcanon law, the mother was certainly not excommunicated, since she had acted "out of grave fear" (cf. no. 5 of this canon) and there was insufficient evidence to show that any member of the medical team was acting with the full awareness and contumacy envisaged in this canon (cf. nos. 8 and 9).[3][4]Bishop Jean-Michel di Falco ofGap, France also denied the applicability to the girl's mother ofcanon 1398 of the1983Code of Canon Law, which imposesautomaticexcommunication for procuring a completed abortion, pointing out that canon 1324 states that automatic censures, such as that which applies for such abortions, do not affect those who act out of grave fear.[5]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ab"Code of Canon Law: Table of Contents".www.vatican.va. Archived fromthe original on December 24, 2007.
  2. ^"Q. 11: Wasn't Archbishop Lefebvre excommunicated for consecrating bishops unlawfully? (for consecrating bishops unlawfully)".archives.sspx.org. Retrieved2022-06-14.
  3. ^Nunes Leal, Luciana (13 March 2009)."CNBB desautoriza iniciativa de bispo".O Estadão de S.Paulo. Archived fromthe original on 2014-02-23.
  4. ^"G1 > Brasil - Notícias - Para CNBB, ninguém foi excomungado em caso de aborto de menina de 9 anos".g1.globo.com.
  5. ^"Mgr di Falco, évêque de Gap, sur l'excommunication au Brésil". Archived fromthe original on March 16, 2012.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Canon_1324&oldid=1245233416"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp