This is an accepted version of this page
 Part ofa series on |
| Spanish missions in the Americas of theCatholic Church |
|---|
 |
| Missions in North America |
| Missions in South America |
| Related topics |
 Catholicism portal |
TheSpanish missions in California (Spanish:Misiones españolas en California) formed aseries of 21 religious outposts or missions established between 1769 and 1833 in what is now the U.S. state ofCalifornia. The missions were established byCatholic priests of theFranciscan order toevangelizeindigenous peoples backed by the military force of theSpanish Empire. The missions were part of the expansion and settlement ofNew Spain through the formation ofAlta California, expanding the empire into the most northern and western parts ofSpanish North America. Civilian settlers and soldiers accompanied missionaries and formed settlements like thePueblo de Los Ángeles.[2]
Indigenous peoples were forced into settlements calledreductions,[3] disrupting their traditional way of life and negatively affecting as many as one thousand villages.[2] European diseases spread in the close quarters of the missions, causing mass death.[4] Abuse, malnourishment, and overworking were common.[5] At least 87,787 baptisms and 63,789 deaths occurred.[6] Indigenous peoples often resisted and rejectedconversion to Christianity.[7] Some fled the missions while others formed rebellions.[7] Missionaries recorded frustrations with getting indigenous people to internalizeCatholic scripture and practice.[7] Indigenous girls were taken away from their parents and housed atmonjeríos.[8] The missions' role in destroying Indigenous culture has been described ascultural genocide.[5]
By 1810, Spain's king had been imprisoned by the French, and financing for military payroll and missions in California ceased.[9] In 1821,Mexico achieved independence from Spain, yet did not send a governor to California until 1824. The missions maintained authority over indigenous peoples and land holdings until the 1830s. At the peak of their influence in 1832, the coastal mission system controlled approximately one-sixth of Alta California.[10] TheFirst Mexican Republic secularized the missions with theMexican Secularization Act of 1833, which emancipated indigenous peoples from the missions. Mission lands were largely given to settlers and soldiers, along with a minority of indigenous people.[7]
The surviving mission buildings are the state of California's oldest structures and most-visited historic monuments, many of which were restored after falling into near disrepair in the early 20th century. They have become a symbol of California, appearing in many movies and television shows,[11] and are an inspiration forMission Revival architecture. Concerns have been raised by historians andIndigenous peoples of California about the way the mission period in California is taught in educational institutions andmemorialized.[8] The oldest European settlements of California were formed around or near Spanish missions, including the four largest:Los Angeles,San Diego,San Jose, andSan Francisco.Santa Barbara, andSanta Cruz were also formed near missions, and the historical imprint reached as far north asSonoma in what became the wine country.
Prior to 1754, grants of mission lands were made directly by the Spanish Crown. But, given the remote locations and the inherent difficulties in communicating with the territorial governments, he delegated authority to make grants to the viceroys of New Spain.[12] During the reign of KingCharles III, they granted lands to allow establishing the Alta California missions. They were motivated in part by presence of Russian fur traders along the California coast in the mid-1700s.[13]
The missions were to be interconnected by an overland route which later became known as theCamino Real. The detailed planning and direction of the missions was to be carried out by FriarJunípero Serra, O.F.M. (who, in 1767, along with his fellowpriests, had taken control over a group of missions inBaja California Peninsula previously administered by the Jesuits). After Serra's death, Rev.Fermín Francisco de Lasuén established nine more mission sites, from 1786 through 1798; others established the last three compounds, along with at least fiveasistencias (mission assistance outposts).[14]
Work on the coastal mission chain was concluded in 1823, completed after Serra's death in 1784. Plans to build a twenty-second mission in Santa Rosa in 1827 were canceled.[notes 1][citation needed]
The Rev.Pedro Estévan Tápis proposed establishing a mission on one of theChannel Islands in the Pacific Ocean offSan Pedro Harbor in 1784, with eitherSanta Catalina orSanta Cruz (known asLimú to theTongva residents) being the most likely locations, the reasoning being that an offshore mission might have attracted potential people to convert who were not living on the mainland, and could have been an effective measure to restrict smuggling operations.[15] GovernorJosé Joaquín de Arrillaga approved the plan the following year; however, an outbreak ofsarampión (measles) killing some 200 Tongva people coupled with a scarcity of land for agriculture and potable water left the success of such a venture in doubt, so no effort to found an island mission was ever made.[citation needed]
In September 1821, the Rev. Mariano Payeras, "Comisario Prefecto" of the California missions, visited Cañada de Santa Ysabel east ofMission San Diego de Alcalá as part of a plan to establish an entire chain of inland missions. TheSanta Ysabel Asistencia had been founded in 1818 as a "mother" mission. However, the plan's expansion never came to fruition.[citation needed]
In addition to thepresidio (royal fort) andpueblo (town), themisión was one of the three major agencies employed by the Spanish sovereign to extend its borders and consolidate itscolonial territories.Asistencias ("satellite" or "sub" missions, sometimes referred to as "contributing chapels") were small-scale missions that regularly conductedMass on days of obligation but lacked a resident priest;[17] as with the missions, these settlements were typically established in areas with high concentrations of potential native converts.[18] The Spanish Californians had never strayed from the coast when establishing their settlements; Mission Nuestra Señora de la Soledad was located farthest inland, being only some thirty miles (48 kilometers) from the shore.[19] Eachfrontier station was forced to be self-supporting, as existing means of supply were inadequate to maintain a colony of any size. California was months away from the nearest base in colonized Mexico, and the cargo ships of the day were too small to carry more than a few months'rations in their holds. To sustain a mission, thepadres required convertedNative Americans, calledneophytes, to cultivatecrops and tendlivestock in the volume needed to support a fair-sized establishment. The scarcity of imported materials, together with a lack of skilled laborers, compelled the missionaries to employ simplebuilding materials and methods in the construction of mission structures.
Although the missions were considered temporary ventures by the Spanishhierarchy, the development of an individual settlement was not simply a matter of "priestly whim." The founding of a mission followed longstanding rules and procedures; the paperwork involved required months, sometimes years of correspondence, and demanded the attention of virtually every level of the bureaucracy. Once empowered to erect a mission in a given area, the men assigned to it chose a specific site that featured a good water supply, plenty of wood for fires and building materials, and ample fields for grazingherds and raisingcrops. The padres blessed the site, and with the aid of theirmilitary escort fashioned temporary shelters out of tree limbs or driven stakes, roofed withthatch orreeds (cañas). It was these simple huts that ultimately gave way to the stone and adobe buildings that exist to the present.
The first priority when beginning a settlement was the location and construction of thechurch (iglesia). The majority of mission sanctuaries were oriented on a roughly east–west axis to take the best advantage of the sun's position for interiorillumination; the exact alignment depended on the geographic features of the particular site. Once the spot for the church had been selected, its position was marked and the remainder of the mission complex was laid out. Theworkshops,kitchens, living quarters, storerooms, and other ancillary chambers were usually grouped in the form of aquadrangle, inside which religious celebrations and other festive events often took place. Thecuadrángulo was rarely a perfect square because the missionaries had nosurveying instruments at their disposal and simply measured off all dimensions by foot. Some fanciful accounts regarding the construction of the missions claimed that tunnels were incorporated in the design, to be used as a means of emergency egress in the event of attack; however, no historical evidence (written or physical) has ever been uncovered to support these assertions.[20][notes 2]
The Alta California missions, known asreductions (reducciones) or congregations (congregaciones), were settlements founded by the Spanish colonizers of theNew World with the purpose of totally assimilating indigenous populations intoEuropean culture and theCatholic religion. It was a doctrine established in 1531, which based the Spanish state's right over the land and persons of the Indies on thePapal charge to evangelize them. It was employed wherever the indigenous populations were not already concentrated in nativepueblos. Indians were congregated around the mission proper through forced resettlement, in which the Spanish "reduced" them from what they perceived to be a free "undisciplined'" state with the ambition of converting them into "civilized" members of colonial society.[25] The civilized and disciplined culture of the natives, developed over 8,000 years, was not considered. A total of 146Friars Minor, mostly Spaniards by birth, were ordained as priests and served in California between 1769 and 1845. Sixty-seven missionaries died at their posts (two asmartyrs:PadresLuis Jayme andAndrés Quintana), while the remainder returned to Europe due to illness, or upon completing their ten-year service commitment.[26] As the rules of the Franciscan Order forbade friars to live alone, two missionaries were assigned to each settlement, sequestered in the mission'sconvento.[27] To these the governor assigned a guard of five or six soldiers under the command of a corporal, who generally acted as steward of the mission's temporal affairs, subject to the priests' direction.[28]
Indians were initially attracted into the mission compounds by gifts of food, colored beads, bits of bright cloth, and trinkets. Once a Native American "gentile" was baptized, they were labeled aneophyte, or new believer. This happened only after a brief period during which the initiates were instructed in the most basic aspects of the Catholic faith. But, while many natives were lured to join the missions out of curiosity and sincere desire to participate and engage in trade, many found themselves trapped once they werebaptized.[29] On the other hand, Indians staffed the militias at each mission[30] and had a role in mission governance.
To thepadres, a baptized Indian person was no longer free to move about the country, but had to labor and worship at the mission under the strict observance of the priests and overseers, who herded them to daily masses and labors. If an Indian did not report for their duties for a period of a few days, they were searched for, and if it was discovered that they had left without permission, they were considered runaways. Large-scale military expeditions were organized to round up the escaped neophytes. Sometimes, the Franciscans allowed neophytes to escape the missions, or they would allow them to visit their home village. However, the Franciscans would only allow this so that they could secretly follow the neophytes. Upon arriving to the village and capturing the runaways, they would take back Indians to the missions, sometimes as many as 200 to 300 Indians.[32]
On one occasion," writesHugo Reid, "they went as far as the present Rancho del Chino, where they tied and whipped every man, woman and child in the lodge, and drove part of them back.... On the road they did the same with those of the lodge at San Jose. On arriving home the men were instructed to throw their bows and arrows at the feet of the priest, and make due submission. The infants were then baptized, as were also all children under eight years of age; the former were left with their mothers, but the latter kept apart from all communication with their parents. The consequence was, first, the women consented to the rite and received it, for the love they bore their children; and finally the males gave way for the purpose of enjoying once more the society of wife and family. Marriage was then performed, and so this contaminated race, in their own sight and that of their kindred, became followers of Christ.[29]
A total of 20,355 natives were "attached" to the California missions in 1806 (the highest figure recorded during the Mission Period); under Mexican rule the number rose to 21,066 (in 1824, the record year during the entire era of the Franciscan missions).[33][notes 5] During the entire period of Mission rule, from 1769 to 1834, the Franciscans baptized 53,600 adult Indians and buried 37,000. Dr. Cook estimates that 15,250 or 45% of the population decrease was caused by disease. Two epidemics ofmeasles, one in 1806 and the other in 1828, caused many deaths. The mortality rates were so high that the missions were constantly dependent upon new conversions.[29]
Young native women were required to reside in themonjerío (or "nunnery") under the supervision of a trusted Indian matron who bore the responsibility for their welfare and education. Women only left the convent after they had been "won" by an Indian suitor and were deemed ready for marriage. Following Spanish custom, courtship took place on either side of a barred window. After the marriage ceremony the woman moved out of the mission compound and into one of the family huts.[34] These "nunneries" were considered a necessity by the priests, who felt the women needed to be protected from the men, both Indian andde razón ("instructed men", i.e. Europeans). The cramped and unsanitary conditions the girls lived in contributed to the fast spread of disease andpopulation decline. So many died at times that many of the Indian residents of the missions urged the priests to raid new villages to supply them with more women.[6]
As of December 31, 1832 (the peak of the mission system's development) the missionpadres had performed a combined total of 87,787 baptisms and 24,529 marriages, and recorded 63,789 deaths.[6] The death rate at the missions, particularly of children, was very high and the majority of children baptized did not survive childhood.[35][36] AtMission San Gabriel, for instance, three of four children died before reaching the age of two.[37]
The high rate of death at the missions have been attributed to several factors, including disease, torture, overworking, malnourishment, andcultural genocide.[5] Forcing native people into close quarters at the missions spread disease quickly. While being kept at the missions, native people were transitioned to a Spanish diet that left them more unable to ward off diseases, the most common beingdysentery,fevers with unknown causes, andvenereal disease.[4]
The death rate has been compared to that of other atrocities. American author and lawyerCarey McWilliams argued that "the Franciscan padres eliminated Indians with the effectiveness ofNazis operatingconcentration camps."[38]
| No. | Name | Baptisms and/or Indigenous population | Deaths and/or remaining pop. | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mission San Diego de Alcalá | 6,638 baptisms total[35] (2,685 children)[36] | 4,428 deaths total[35] | From 1810 to 1820, "the death rate among the neophytes was 77% of baptisms and 35% of the population." Only 34 families remained after the mission was secularized in 1833.[36] |
| 2 | Mission San Luis Rey de Francia | 5,401 baptisms total (1,862 children)[36] 2,869 people in 1826[35] | ||
| 3 | Mission San Juan Capistrano | 4,317 baptisms total (2,628 children)[36] | 3,153 deaths total[36] | |
| 4 | Mission San Gabriel Arcángel | 7,854 baptisms total (2,459 children)[35] 1,701 people in 1817[35] | 5,656 deaths total (2,916 children)[35] 1,320 people in 1834[35] | A missionary reported that three out of four children died at the mission before reaching the age of 2.[37] |
| 5 | Mission San Fernando Rey de España | 1,367 children baptized 1,080 people in 1819[35] | 965 children died[35] | "It was not strange that the fearful death rate both of children and adults at the missions sometimes frightened the neophytes into running away."[35] |
| 6 | Mission San Buenaventura | 3,805 baptisms total (1,909 children)[36] 1,330 people in 1816[35] | 626 people remaining in 1834[36] | Hubert Howe Bancroft estimated that there were about 250 people in 1840 remaining from the mission living in scattered communities.[36] |
| 7 | Mission Santa Barbara | 1,792 people in 1803[35] | 556 people remaining in 1834[35] | "At such a rate it would not, even if mission rule had continued, have taken more than a dozen years to depopulate the mission."[35] |
| 8 | Mission Santa Inés | 757 children baptized 770 people in 1816[35] | 519 children died 334 people remaining in 1834[35] | |
| 9 | Mission La Purísima Concepción | 1,492 children baptized total 1,520 people in 1804[35] | 902 children died 407 people in remaining in 1834[35] | |
| 10 | Mission San Luis Obispo de Tolosa | 2,608 baptisms total (1,331`children) 852 people in 1803[35] | 264 people remaining in 1834[35] | |
| 11 | Mission San Miguel Arcángel | 2,588 baptisms total 1,076 people in 1814[35] | 2,038 deaths total 599 people remaining in 1834[35] | "The lowest death rate in any of the missions."[35] |
| 12 | Mission San Antonio de Padua | 4,348 baptisms total (2,587 children)[35] 1,296 people in 1805[35] | 567 people remaining in 1834[35] | |
| 13 | Mission Nuestra Señora de la Soledad | 2,222 baptisms total 725 people in 1805[35] | 1,803 deaths total 300 people remaining[35] | |
| 14 | Mission San Carlos Borromeo de Carmelo | 971 people in 1794, 758 in 1800, 513 in 1810, 381 in 1820[36] | 150 people remaining in 1834[35] | "At the rate of decrease under mission rule, a few more years would have produced... the extinction of the mission Indian."[35] |
| 15 | Mission San Juan Bautista | 1,248 people in 1823[35] | 850 people remaining in 1834[35] | "The only mission whose population increased from 1810 to 1820. This was due to the fact that its numbers were recruited from the eastern tribes."[35] "The appalling smell from the graveyard saturated the entire Mission building."[4] |
| 16 | Mission Santa Cruz | 2,466 baptisms total 644 people in 1798[35] | 2,034 deaths total 250 people remaining in 1834[35] | |
| 17 | Mission Santa Clara de Asís | 7,711 baptisms (3,177 children) 927 people in 1790, 1,464 in 1827[36] | 150 people remaining in 1834[36] | Very sharp decline in the native population from 1827 to 1834. "The death rate at the mission was very high."[36] |
| 18 | Mission San José | 6,737 baptisms total 1,754 people in 1820[35] | 5,109 deaths total[35] | |
| 19 | Mission San Francisco de Asís | 880 deaths in 1806 alone[39] | "An epidemic [in 1806] had broken out in the Mission Dolores and a number of the Indians were transferred to San Rafael to escape the plague."[35] | |
| 20 | Mission San Rafael Arcángel | 1,873 baptisms total 1,140 people in 1828[35] | 698 deaths total Less than 500 people remaining[35] | |
| 21 | Mission San Francisco Solano | 1,315 baptisms total 996 people in 1832[35] | 651 deaths total About 550 people remaining[35] |
At least 90,000Indigenous peoples were kept in well-guarded mission compounds throughout the state asde factoslaves.[40] The policy of the Franciscans was to keep them constantly occupied. Bells were vitally important to daily life at any mission. The bells were rung at mealtimes, to call the Mission residents to work and to religious services, during births and funerals, to signal the approach of a ship or returning missionary, and at other times; novices were instructed in the intricate rituals associated with the ringing the mission bells. The daily routine began with sunriseMass and morningprayers, followed by instruction of the natives in the teachings of theRoman Catholic faith. After a breakfast ofatole, the able-bodied men and women were assigned their tasks for the day. The women were committed to dressmaking, knitting, weaving, embroidering, laundering, and cooking, while some of the stronger girls ground flour or carried adobe bricks (weighing 55lb, or 25 kg each) to the men engaged in building. The men worked a variety of jobs, having learned from the missionaries how to plow, sow, irrigate, cultivate, reap, thresh, and glean. They were taught to build adobe houses, tan leather hides, shear sheep, weave rugs and clothing from wool, make ropes, soap, paint, and other useful duties.[citation needed]
The work day was six hours, interrupted by dinner (lunch) around 11:00 a.m. and a two-hoursiesta, and ended with evening prayers and therosary, supper, and social activities. About 90 days out of each year were designated as religious or civil holidays, free frommanual labor. The labor organization of the missions resembled a slave plantation in many respects.[42][notes 6] Foreigners who visited the missions remarked at how the priests' control over the Indians appeared excessive, but necessary given the white men's isolation and numeric disadvantage.[43][notes 7] Subsequently, the Missions operated under strict and harsh conditions; A 'light' punishment would've been considered 25 lashings (azotes).[44] Indians were not paid wages as they were not considered free laborers and, as a result, the missions were able to profit from the goods produced by theMission Indians to the detriment of the other Spanish and Mexican settlers of the time who could not compete economically with the advantage of the mission system.[45]
The Franciscans began to send neophytes to work as servants of Spanish soldiers in thepresidios. Each presidio was provided with land, el rancho del rey, which served as a pasture for the presidio livestock and as a source of food for the soldiers. Theoretically the soldiers were supposed to work on this land themselves but within a few years the neophytes were doing all the work on the presidio farm and, in addition, were serving domestics for the soldiers. While the fiction prevailed that neophytes were to receive wages for their work, no attempt was made to collect the wages for these services after 1790. It is recorded that the neophytes performed the work "under unmitigated compulsion."[29]
In recent years, much debate has arisen about the priests' treatment of the Indians during the Mission period, and many believe that the California mission system is directly responsible for the decline of the native cultures.[43][notes 8] From the perspective of the Spanish priest, their efforts were a well-meaning attempt to improve the lives of the heathen natives.[46][notes 9][47][notes 10]
The missionaries of California were by-and-large well-meaning, devoted men...[whose] attitudes toward the Indians ranged from genuine (if paternalistic) affection to wrathful disgust. They were ill-equipped—nor did most truly desire—to understand complex and radically different Native American customs. Using European standards, they condemned the Indians for living in a "wilderness," for worshipping false gods or no God at all, and for having no written laws, standing armies, forts, or churches.[48]
The Franciscan arrival to Alta California came with a wave of torture, rape, and murder towards the native population of California.[citation needed] Native Californians, attracted to the Missions by the promise of food and gifts,[citation needed] were forcibly prevented from leaving. Any who attempted to escape was usually given a severe beating and put in shackles. Any form of Native rebellion was met with force due to numerical disadvantage facing the Franciscans.[49]
When Native Women attempted to abort their unborn children – which they had conceived as a byproduct of rape, the Friars would have them beaten, chained in iron, shaved, and stipulated to stand in-front of the altar each mass with a decorated wooden newborn.[49]
This trend of violence was due to the Franciscans' desire for a greater Hispanicized population in Alta California, both for protection against a foreign invasion and for a labor force to benefit the Spanish Empire. As a result, a higher emphasis of Native reproduction was a duty taken on by the Spanish Fransicans. Tejana born feminist historian Antonia Castañeda wrote about the treatment that would occur in Mission Santa Cruz:[50]
Father Olbes at Mission Santa Cruz ordered an infertile couple to have sexual intercourse in his presence because he did not believe they could not have children. The couple refused, but Olbes forcibly inspected the man's penis to learn 'whether or not it was in good order' and tried to inspect the woman's genitalia. She refused, fought with him, and tried to bite him. Olbes ordered that she be tied by the hands, and given fifty lashes, shackled, and locked up in themonjerío (women's dormitory). He then had a monigote made and commanded that she "treat the doll as though it were a child and carry it in the presence of everyone for nine days." While the woman was beaten and her sexuality demeaned, the husband, who had been intimate with another woman, was ridiculed and humiliated. A set of cow horns was tied to his head with leather thongs, thereby converting him into a cuckold, and he was herded to daily Mass in cow horns and fetters.
Franciscan Priests would also forbid any form of native culture in the Mission system. This would include but not be limited to, songs, dances, and ceremonies. They objectified the destruction of any form of morality, ideology or personality that characterized the Native life.Women, in particular, would face a higher degree of punishment. Those who did not comply with the Missions demands would be labeled a witch, dehumanizing them for further violence.
University of Chicago Professor Ramon Guttiriez wrote:[50]: 701
One can interpret the whole history of the persecution of Indian women as witches ... as a struggle over [these] competing ways of defining the body and of regulating procreation as the church endeavored to constrain the expression of desire within boundaries that clerics defined proper and acceptable.
The goal of the missions was, above all, to become self-sufficient in relatively short order. Farming, therefore, was the most importantindustry of any mission. Barley,maize, and wheat were among the most common crops grown. Cereal grains were dried and ground by stone into flour. Even today, California is well known for the abundance and many varieties of fruit trees that are cultivated throughout the state. The only fruits indigenous to the region, however, consisted of wild berries or grew on small bushes. Spanishmissionaries brought fruit seeds over from Europe, many of which had been introduced from Asia following earlier expeditions to the continent; orange, grape, apple, peach, pear, and fig seeds were among the most prolific of the imports. Grapes were also grown andfermented into wine forsacramental use and again, for trading. The specific variety, called theCriolla orMission grape, was first planted at Mission San Juan Capistrano in 1779; in 1783, the first wine produced in Alta California emerged from the mission's winery.Ranching also became an important mission industry as cattle and sheep herds were raised.[citation needed]
Mission San Gabriel Arcángel unknowingly witnessed the origin of the California citrus industry with the planting of the region's first significant orchard in 1804, though the commercial potential of citrus was not realized until 1841.[51] Olives (first cultivated at Mission San Diego de Alcalá) were grown, cured, and pressed under large stone wheels to extract their oil, both for use at the mission and to trade for other goods. The Rev. Serra set aside a portion of the Mission Carmel gardens in 1774 for tobacco plants, a practice that soon spread throughout the mission system.[52][notes 11]
It was also the missions' responsibility to provide the Spanish forts, orpresidios, with the necessary foodstuffs, and manufactured goods to sustain operations. It was a constant point of contention between missionaries and the soldiers as to how manyfanegas[53] of barley, or how many shirts or blankets the mission had to provide the garrisons on any given year. At times these requirements were hard to meet, especially during years of drought, or when the much anticipated shipments from the port ofSan Blas failed to arrive. The Spaniards kept meticulous records of mission activities, and each year reports submitted to the Father-Presidente summarizing both the material and spiritual status at each of the settlements.[citation needed]
Livestock was raised, not only for the purpose of obtaining meat, but also for wool, leather, and tallow, and for cultivating the land. In 1832, at the height of their prosperity, the missions collectively owned:[54]
All these grazing animals were originally brought up from Mexico. A great many Indians were required to guard the herds and flocks on themission ranches, which created the need for "...a class of horsemen scarcely surpassed anywhere."[28] These animals multiplied beyond the settler's expectations, often overrunning pastures and extending well-beyond the domains of the missions. The giant herds of horses and cows took well to the climate and the extensive pastures of the Coastal California region, but at a heavy price for the California Native American people. The uncontrolled spread of these new herds, and associatedinvasive exotic plant species, quickly exhausted thenative plants in the grasslands,[55] and thechaparral and woodlands that the Indians depended on for their seed, foliage, and bulb harvests. The grazing-overgrazing problems were also recognized by the Spaniards, who periodically had extermination parties cull and kill thousands of excess livestock, when herd populations grew beyond their control or the land's capacity. Years with a severe drought did this also.[citation needed]
Mission kitchens andbakeries prepared and served thousands of meals each day. Candles, soap, grease, and ointments were all made fromtallow (rendered animal fat) in large vats located just outside the west wing. Also situated in this general area were vats for dyeing wool andtanning leather, and primitive looms for weaving. Largebodegas (warehouses) provided long-term storage for preserved foodstuffs and other treated materials.[citation needed]
Each mission had to fabricate virtually all of its construction materials from local materials. Workers in thecarpintería (carpentry shop) used crude methods to shape beams, lintels, and other structural elements; more skilled artisans carved doors, furniture, and wooden implements. For certain applications bricks (ladrillos) were fired in ovens (kilns) to strengthen them and make them more resistant to the elements; whentejas (roof tiles) eventually replaced the conventionaljacal roofing (densely packed reeds) they were placed in the kilns to harden them as well. Glazed ceramic pots, dishes, and canisters were also made in mission kilns.[citation needed]
Prior to the establishment of the missions, the native peoples knew only how to utilize bone, seashells, stone, and wood for building, tool making, weapons, and so forth. The missionaries established manual training in European skills and methods; in agriculture, mechanical arts, and the raising and care of livestock. Everything consumed and otherwise utilized by the natives was produced at the missions under the supervision of the padres; thus, the neophytes not only supported themselves, but after 1811 sustained the entire military and civil government of California.[56] Thefoundry at Mission San Juan Capistrano was the first to introduce the Indians to theIron Age. Theblacksmith used the mission'sforges (California's first) tosmelt and fashion iron into everything from basic tools and hardware (such as nails) to crosses, gates, hinges, even cannon for mission defense. Iron in particular was a commodity that the mission acquired solely through trade, as there was no mining infrastructure or industry in the region.[57]
No study of the missions is complete without mention of their extensivewater supply systems. Stonezanjas (aqueducts, sometimes spanning miles, brought fresh water from a nearby river or spring to the mission site. Open or covered lined ditches and/or baked clay pipes, joined withlime mortar orbitumen, gravity-fed the water into largecisterns and fountains, and emptied into waterways where the force of the water was used to turn grinding wheels and other simple machinery, or dispensed for use in cleaning. Water used for drinking and cooking was allowed to trickle through alternate layers of sand and charcoal to remove the impurities. One of the best-preserved mission water systems is at Mission Santa Barbara.[58]
Beginning in 1492 with the voyages ofChristopher Columbus, theKingdom of Spain sought to establish missions to convert indigenous people inNueva España (New Spain), which consisted of the Caribbean, Mexico, and most of what is now theSouthwestern United States) to Catholicism. This would facilitatecolonization of these landsawarded to Spain by theCatholic Church, including that region later known asAlta California.[notes 12][notes 13][59][notes 14]
Only 48 years after Columbus discovered the Americas for Europe,Francisco Vázquez de Coronado set out from Compostela, New Spain on February 23, 1540, at the head of a large expedition. Accompanied by 400 European men-at-arms (mostly Spaniards), 1,300 to 2,000 Mexican Indian allies, several Indian and African slaves, and four Franciscan friars, he traveled fromMexico through parts of the southwesternUnited States to present-dayKansas between 1540 and 1542.[60][61] Two years later on 27 June 1542,Juan Rodriguez Cabrillo set out fromNavidad, Mexico and sailed up the coast of Baja California and into the region of Alta California.[62]
Unknown to Spain, SirFrancis Drake, an English privateer who raided Spanish treasure ships and colonial settlements, claimed the Alta California region asNova Albion for theEnglish Crown in 1579, a full generation before the first English landing inJamestown in 1607. During hiscircumnavigation of the world, Drake anchored in a harbor just north of present-day San Francisco, California, establishing friendly relations with theCoastal Miwok and claiming the territory for QueenElizabeth I. However, Drake sailed back to England and England (and later Britain) never pressed for any sort of claim regarding the region.[63][64][65][66]
However, it was not until 1741 that the Spanish monarchy of KingPhilip V was stimulated to consider how to protect his claims to Alta California. Philip was spurred on when the territorial ambitions of theRussian Empire were expressed in theVitus Bering expedition along the western coast on the North American continent.[67][68][notes 15][69][notes 16]
California represents the "high-water mark" of Spanish expansion in North America as the last and northernmost colony on the continent.[70] The mission system arose in part from the need to control Spain's ever-expanding holdings in the New World. Realizing that the colonies required a literate population base that the mother country could not supply, the Spanish government (with the cooperation of the Church) established a network of missions to convert theindigenous population to Christianity. They aimed to make converts and tax-paying citizens of those they conquered.[47][notes 17] To make them into Spanish citizens and productive inhabitants, the Spanish government and the Church required the indigenous people to learn Spanish language and vocational skills along with Christian teachings.[71]
Estimates for the pre-contact indigenous population in California are based on a number of different sources and vary substantially, from as few as 133,000,[72] to 225,000,[73] toas many as 705,000 representing more than 100 separate tribes or nations.[74][75][notes 18][notes 19]
On January 29, 1767, Spain's KingCharles III ordered the new governorGaspar de Portolá toforcibly expel theJesuits, who operated under the authority of the Pope and had established a chain of fifteenmissions on theBaja California Peninsula.[76][notes 20]Visitador GeneralJosé de Gálvez engaged theFranciscans, under the leadership of FriarJunípero Serra, to take charge of those outposts on March 12, 1768.[77] Thepadres closed or consolidated several of the existing settlements, and also foundedMisión San Fernando Rey de España de Velicatá (the only Franciscan mission in all of Baja California) and the nearbyVisita de la Presentación in 1769. This plan, however, changed within a few months after Gálvez received the following orders: "Occupy and fortify San Diego and Monterey for God and the King of Spain."[78] The Church ordered the priests of theDominican Order to take charge of the Baja California missions so the Franciscans could concentrate on founding new missions in Alta California.
On July 14, 1769, Gálvez sent thePortolá expedition out from Loreto to explore lands to the north. LeaderGaspar de Portolá was accompanied by a group of Franciscans led byJunípero Serra. Serra's plan was to extend the string of missions north from the Baja California peninsula, connected by an established road and spaced a day's travel apart. The first Alta California mission and presidio were founded at San Diego, the second at Monterey.[80]
En route to Monterey, the Rev. Francisco Gómez and the Rev.Juan Crespí came across a Native settlement wherein two young girls were dying: one, a baby, said to be "dying at its mother's breast," the other a small girl suffering of burns. On July 22, Gómez baptized the baby, naming herMaria Magdalena, while Crespí baptized the older child, naming herMargarita. These were the first recorded baptisms in Alta California.[81] Crespi dubbed the spotLos Cristianos.[79][notes 21] The group continued northward but missed Monterey Harbor and returned to San Diego on January 24, 1770. Near the end of 1769 the Portolá expedition had reached its most northerly point at present-daySan Francisco. In following years, theSpanish Crown sent a number of follow-up expeditions to explore more of Alta California.
Spain also settled theCalifornia region with a number of African andmulatto Catholics, including at least ten of the recently re-discoveredLos Pobladores, the founders ofLos Angeles in 1781.[82]
The original intent was for each mission to be turned over to asecular clergy and all the common mission lands distributed amongst the native population within ten years after its founding. This policy was based upon Spain's experience with the more advanced tribes in Mexico, Central America, andPeru.[84]
In time, it became apparent to the Rev. Serra and his associates that thenatives on the northern frontier in Alta California required a much longer period of acclimatization.[28] None of the California missions ever attained completeself-sufficiency, and required continued (albeit modest) financial support from mother Spain.[85]
Mission development was financed out ofEl Fondo Piadoso de las Californias (ThePious Fund of the Californias to enable the missionaries to propagate the Catholic faith inthe area then known as California. The fund originated in 1697 and consisted of voluntary donations from individuals and religious bodies in Mexico to members of theSociety of Jesus.[86]
With the onset of theMexican War of Independence in 1810, support from the Pious Fund largely disappeared. Missions and converts were left on their own.[86]
In 1800, native labor comprised the backbone of the colonial economy. Possibly "the worst epidemic of the Spanish Era in California" occurred between March and May 1806 when ameasles epidemic and related complications killed one-quarter of the mission native population in theSan Francisco Bay Area.[87]
In 1811, the Spanish Viceroy in Mexico sent aninterrogatorio (questionnaire) to all of the missions in Alta California regarding the customs, disposition, and condition of the Mission Indians.[88] The replies varied greatly in the length, spirit, and even the value of the information provided. They were collected and prefaced by the Father-Presidente with a short general statement or abstract; the compilation was thereupon forwarded to the viceregal government.[89][notes 22] The contemporary nature of the responses, no matter how incomplete or biased some may be, are nonetheless of considerable value to modernethnologists.
Russian colonization of the Americas extended as far south as present-dayGraton,Point Arena, andTomales Bay. Chernyk, the farming community near Graton, was about 30 miles (48 km) from present-daySonoma, California. It had a barracks, agricultural buildings, fields of grain and vegetables, an orchard and a vineyard.[91] Their primary location was atFort Ross (krepost' rus), an agricultural, scientific, andfur trading settlement located on the coast.[92] When they exterminated the sea otter and seal populations, they failed in the ambition to supply Russia's Alaskan settlements from California and left the area.[91]
In November and December 1818, several of the missions were attacked byHipólito Bouchard, "California's only pirate."[notes 23] A Frenchprivateer sailing under the flag ofArgentina,Pirata Buchar (as Bouchard was known to the locals) worked his way down the California coast, conducting raids on the installations at Monterey,Santa Barbara, and San Juan Capistrano, with limited success.[93] Upon hearing of the attacks, many mission priests (along with a few government officials) sought refuge atMission Nuestra Señora de la Soledad, the mission chain's most isolated outpost. Ironically,Mission Santa Cruz (though ultimately ignored by the marauders) was ignominiously sacked and vandalized by local residents who were entrusted with securing the church's valuables.[94]
By 1819, Spain decided to limit its "reach" in the New World toNorthern California due to the costs involved in sustaining these remote outposts; the northernmost settlement therefore isMission San Francisco Solano, founded in Sonoma in 1823.[95][notes 24]
An attempt to found a twenty-second mission inSanta Rosa in 1827 was aborted.[95][notes 25][notes 26][96][notes 27] In 1833, the final group of missionaries arrived in Alta California. These were Mexican-born (rather than Spaniards), and had been trained at theApostolic College of Our Lady of Guadalupe in Zacatecas. Among these friars wasFrancisco García Diego y Moreno, who would become the first bishop of the Diocese of Both Californias. These friars would bear the brunt of the changes brought on by secularization and the U.S. occupation, and many would be marked by allegations of corruption.[97]
TheChumash people revolted against the Spanish presence in 1824. The Chumash planned a coordinated rebellion at three missions. Due to an incident with a soldier at Mission Santa Inés, the rebellion began on Saturday, February 21. The Chumash withdrew from Mission Santa Inés upon the arrival of military reinforcements, then attacked Mission La Purisima from inside, forced the garrison to surrender, and allowed the garrison, their families, and the mission priest to depart for Santa Inés. The next day, the Chumash of Mission Santa Barbara captured the mission from within without bloodshed, repelled a military attack on the mission, and then retreated from the mission to the hills. The Chumash continued to occupy Mission La Purisima until a Mexican military unit attacked people on March 16 and forced them to surrender. Two military expeditions were sent after the Chumash in the hills; the first did not find them and the second negotiated with the Chumash and convinced a majority to return to the missions by June 28.[98]
As the Mexican republic matured, calls for thesecularization ("disestablishment") of the missions increased.[99][notes 28]
José María de Echeandía, the first native Mexican elected Governor of Alta California issued a "Proclamation of Emancipation" (or "Prevenciónes de Emancipacion") on July 25, 1826.[100] All Indians within the military districts of San Diego, Santa Barbara, andMonterey who were found qualified were freed from missionary rule and made eligible to become Mexican citizens. Those who wished to remain under mission tutelage were exempted from most forms of corporal punishment.[101][102][notes 29] By 1830, even the neophyte populations themselves appeared confident in their own abilities to operate the mission ranches and farms independently; thepadres, however, doubted the capabilities of their charges in this regard.[103]
Accelerating immigration, both Mexican and foreign, increased pressure on the Alta California government to seize the mission properties and dispossess the natives in accordance with Echeandía's directive.[104][notes 30] Despite the fact that Echeandía's emancipation plan was met with little encouragement from the novices who populated the southern missions, he was nonetheless determined to test the scheme on a large scale at Mission San Juan Capistrano. To that end, he appointed a number ofcomisionados (commissioners) to oversee the emancipation of the Indians.[105] The Mexican government passed legislation on December 20, 1827, that mandated the expulsion of all Spaniards younger than sixty years of age from Mexican territories; Governor Echeandía nevertheless intervened on behalf of some of the missionaries to prevent their deportation once the law took effect in California.[106]
Upon arriving inMonterey, California in April 1832,[107][108]Thomas O. Larkin found the economics of land and commerce were controlled by the Spanish missions, presidios, pueblos, and a few ranchos.[109]
The lands of each mission joined those of other missions on either side, so that all were connected, or, in other words, the missionaries occupied all the land along the coast, except the presidios, the three pueblos and their lands, and a few ranchos which were held by virtue of grants from the King of Spain.... The missionaries objected to any settlements in the country but the missions; the presidios they regarded as a necessary evil.
GovernorJosé Figueroa (who took office in 1833) initially attempted to keep the mission system intact, but theMexican Congress passedAn Act for the Secularization of the Missions of California on August 17, 1833, when liberalValentín Gómez Farías was in office.[110][notes 31]
The Act also provided for the colonization of both Alta and Baja California, the expenses of this latter move to be borne by the proceeds gained from the sale of the mission property to private interests.
For instance, after Mexican independence, the Mexican government confiscated Franciscan lands and decommissioned them. This, however, did not see the end of Native plight since further dislocation and abuse occurred under Mexican control. Most of the confiscated Franciscan lands were given out as grants to white settlers or well connected Mexicans, while Native Californians continued to occupy the land as a labor force.[111]
Mission San Juan Capistrano was the very first to feel the effects of secularization when, on August 9, 1834, Governor Figueroa issued his "Decree of Confiscation."[112] Nine other settlements quickly followed, with six more in 1835;San Buenaventura and San Francisco de Asís were among the last to succumb, in June and December 1836, respectively.[113] TheFranciscans soon thereafter abandoned most of the missions, taking with them almost everything of value, after which the locals typically plundered the mission buildings for construction materials. Former mission pasture lands were divided into large land grants calledranchos, greatly increasing the number of private land holdings in Alta California.
The Indian towns atSan Juan Capistrano,San Dieguito, andLas Flores continued for some time under a provision inGobernador Echeandía's 1826 Proclamation that allowed for the partial conversion of missions topueblos.[114]
According to one estimate, the native population in and around the missions proper was approximately 80,000 at the time of the confiscation; others claim that the statewide population had dwindled to approximately 100,000 by the early 1840s, due in no small part to the natives' exposure to European diseases, and from the Franciscan practice of cloistering women in theconvento and controlling sexuality during the child-bearing age. (Baja California Territory experienced a similar reduction in native population resulting from Spanish colonization efforts there).[115]
Pío de Jesús Pico, the last Mexican Governor of Alta California, found upon taking office that there were few funds available to carry on the affairs of the province. He prevailed upon the assembly to pass a decree authorizing the renting or the sale of all mission property, reserving only the church, a curate's house, and a building for a courthouse. The expenses of conducting the services of the church were to be provided from the proceeds, but there was no disposition made as to what should be done to secure the funds for that purpose.
After secularization, Father-Presidente Narciso Durán transferred the missions' headquarters to Santa Bárbara, thereby making Mission Santa Bárbara the repository of some 3,000 original documents that had been scattered through the California missions. The Mission archive is the oldest library in the State of California that still remains in the hands of its founders, the Franciscans (it is the only mission where they have maintained an uninterrupted presence). Beginning with the writings ofHubert Howe Bancroft, the library has served as a center for historical study of the missions for more than a century. In 1895, journalist and historianCharles Fletcher Lummis criticized the Act and its results, saying:
Disestablishment—a polite term for robbery—by Mexico (rather than by native Californians misrepresenting the Mexican government) in 1834, was the death blow of the mission system. The lands were confiscated; the buildings were sold for beggarly sums, and often for beggarly purposes. The Indian converts were scattered and starved out; the noble buildings were pillaged for their tiles and adobes...[117]
Precise figures relating to the population decline of California indigenes are not available. One writer,Gregory Orfalea, estimates that pre-contact population was reduced by 33 percent during Spanish and Mexican rule, mostly through introduction of European diseases, but much more after the United States takeover in 1848. By 1870, the loss of indigenous lives had become catastrophic. Up to 80 percent died, leaving a population of about 30,000 in 1870. Orfalea claims that nearly half of the native deaths after 1848 were murder.[73]
In 1837–38, a major smallpox epidemic devastated native tribes north of San Francisco Bay, in the jurisdiction of Mission San Francisco Solano. GeneralMariano Vallejo estimated that 70,000 died from the disease.[118] Vallejo's ally, chiefSem-Yeto, was one of the few natives to be vaccinated, and one of the few to survive.
When the mission properties were secularized between 1834 and 1838, the approximately 15,000 residentneophytes lost whatever protection the mission system afforded them. While under the secularization laws the natives were to receive up to one-half of the mission properties, this never happened. The natives lost whatever stock and movable property they may have accumulated. When California became a U.S. state, California law stripped them of legal title to the land. In the Act of September 30, 1850,Congress appropriated funds to allow the President to appoint three Commissioners,O. M. Wozencraft,Redick McKee andGeorge W. Barbour, to study the California situation and "...negotiate treaties with the various Indian tribes of California." Treaty negotiations ensued during the period between March 19, 1851, and January 7, 1852, during which the Commission interacted with 402 Indian chiefs and headmen (representing approximately one-third to one-half of the California tribes) and entered into eighteen treaties.[119]
California SenatorWilliam M. Gwin's Act of March 3, 1851 created thePublic Land Commission, whose purpose was to determine the validity of Spanish and Mexicanland grants in California.[120] On February 19, 1853ArchbishopJoseph Sadoc Alemany filed petitions for the return of all former mission lands in the state. Ownership of 1,051.44 acres (4.2550 km2) (essentially exact area of land occupied by the original mission buildings, cemeteries, and gardens) was subsequently conveyed to the Church, along with theCañada de los Pinos (or College Rancho) inSanta Barbara County comprising 35,499.73 acres (143.6623 km2), andLa Laguna inSan Luis Obispo County, consisting of 4,157.02 acres (16.8229 km2).[121] As the result of aU.S. government investigation in 1873, a number ofIndian reservations were assigned by executive proclamation in 1875. The commissioner of Indian affairs reported in 1879 that the number ofMission Indians in the state was down to around 3,000.[122]
Some modernanthropologists cite a cultural bias on the part of the missionaries that blinded them to the natives' plight and caused them to develop strong negative opinions of the California Indians.[123][notes 32]
Themission project was a popular teaching tool used in California to teach school children about the Spanish missions, but became controversial.[124][125] Its popularity began decreasing in the mid-2010s as educators questioned whether the assignment effectively teaches students about the Spanish missions' impact on indigenous Californians.[126][127]
European diseases likeinfluenza,measles,tuberculosis,gonorrhea, anddysenterykilled a significant number of natives as a result of their contact with the Europeans, as theCalifornia Native Americans had no immunity to these diseases.[128] Miners and settlers contributed to the high death rate.[129]
Between 1846 and 1870, California's Indian population plunged from perhaps 150,000 to 30,000. Diseases, dislocation, and starvation caused many of these deaths. However, abduction, unfree labor, mass death on reservations, individual homicides, battles, and massacres also took thousands of lives and hindered reproduction.
The close relationship between church and government found in the original California mission system was a foundation for later forms of government.[130] The early missions and their sub-missions formed the nuclei of what would later become the major metropolitan areas ofSan Francisco andLos Angeles, as well as many other smaller municipalities.[131]
By eliminating thenative population, the Spanish, Mexican, and later American settlers could take over the land without opposition. The early Spanish mission system established the basis for the cattle and agriculture economies that flourish in the state today.[132][133]
The "Father-Presidente" was the head of the Catholic missions in Alta and Baja California.
He was appointed by theCollege of San Fernando de Mexico until 1812. Then the position became known as the "Commissary Prefect" who was appointed by the Commissary General of the Indies, a Franciscan residing in Spain. Beginning in 1831, separate individuals were elected to oversee Upper and Lower California.[134]
.jpg)
† The Rev. Payeras and the Rev. Durán remained at their resident missions during their terms asFather-Presidente, therefore those settlements became thede facto headquarters (until 1833, when all mission records were permanently relocated to Santa Barbara).[110][notes 33][135]
There were 21 missions accompanied by military outposts inAlta California fromSan Diego toSonoma, California. To facilitate travel between them on horse and foot, the mission settlements were situated approximately 30 miles (48 kilometers) apart, about oneday's journey on horseback, or three days on foot. The entire trail eventually became a 600-mile (966-kilometer) long "California Mission Trail."[136]: 132 [137]: 152 Heavy freight movement was practical only via water. Tradition has it that the padres sprinkledmustard seeds along the trail to mark it with bright yellow flowers.[138]: 79 [139]: 260
Following the oldCamino Real northwards, fromSan Diego through to the northernmost mission inSonoma, California, north ofSan Francisco Bay, the missions were:
During the Mission Period Alta California was divided into four military districts. Each was garrisoned (comandancias) by a presidio strategically placed along the California coast to protect the missions and other Spanish settlements in Upper California.[140] Each of these functioned as a base of military operations for a specific region. They were independent of one another and were organized from south to north as follows:
An ongoing power struggle between church and state grew increasingly heated and lasted for decades. Originating as a feud between the Rev. Serra andPedro Fages (the military governor of Alta California from 1770 to 1774, who regarded the Spanish installations in California as military institutions first and religious outposts second), the uneasy relationship persisted for more than sixty years.[150][151][notes 34] Dependent upon one another for their very survival, military leaders and missionpadres nevertheless adopted conflicting stances regarding everything from land rights, the allocation of supplies, protection of the missions, the criminal propensities of the soldiers, and (in particular) the status of the native populations.[152][notes 35]
California is home to the greatest number of well-preserved missions found in any U.S. state.[63][notes 36] The missions are collectively the best-knownhistoric element of the coastal regions of California:
Because virtually all of the artwork at the missions served either a devotional or didactic purpose, there was no underlying reason for the mission residents to record their surroundings graphically; visitors, however, found them to be objects of curiosity.[154] During the 1850s a number of artists found gainful employment as draftsmen attached to expeditions sent to map the Pacific coastline and the border between California and Mexico (as well as plot practical railroad routes); many of the drawings were reproduced aslithographs in the expedition reports.[citation needed]
In 1875 AmericanillustratorHenry Chapman Ford began visiting each of the twenty-one mission sites, where he created a historically important portfolio of watercolors, oils, and etchings. His depictions of the missions were (in part) responsible for the revival of interest in the state's Spanish heritage, and indirectly for the restoration of the missions. The 1880s saw the appearance of a number of articles on the missions in national publications and the first books on the subject; as a result, a large number of artists did one or more mission paintings, though few attempted a series.[155]
The popularity of the missions also stemmed largely fromHelen Hunt Jackson's 1884 novelRamona and the subsequent efforts ofCharles Fletcher Lummis,William Randolph Hearst, and other members of the "Landmarks Club of Southern California" to restore three of the southern missions in the early 20th century (San Juan Capistrano, San Diego de Alcalá, and San Fernando; the PalaAsistencia was also restored by this effort).[156][notes 37] Lummis wrote in 1895,
In ten years from now—unless our intelligence shall awaken at once—there will remain of these noble piles nothing but a few indeterminable heaps of adobe. We shall deserve and shall have the contempt of all thoughtful people if we suffer our noble missions to fall.[157]
In acknowledgement of the magnitude of the restoration efforts required and the urgent need to have acted quickly to prevent further or even total degradation, Lummis went on to state,
It is no exaggeration to say that human power could not have restored these four missions had there been a five-year delay in the attempt.[158]
In 1911 authorJohn Steven McGroarty pennedThe Mission Play, a three-hour pageant describing the California missions from their founding in 1769 through secularization in 1834, and ending with their "final ruin" in 1847.
Today, the missions exist in varying degrees of architectural integrity and structural soundness. The most common extant features at the mission grounds include the church building and an ancillaryconvento (convent) wing. In some cases (inSan Rafael,Santa Cruz, andSoledad, for example), the current buildings are replicas constructed on or near the original site. Other mission compounds remain relatively intact and true to their original, Mission Era construction.
A notable example of an intact complex is the now-threatened Mission San Miguel Arcángel: its chapel retains the original interiormurals created bySalinanIndians under the direction ofEsteban Munras, a Spanish artist and last Spanish diplomat to California. This structure was closed to the public from 2003 to 2009 due to severe damage from theSan Simeon earthquake. Many missions have preserved (or in some cases reconstructed) historic features in addition to chapel buildings.
The missions have earned a prominent place in California's historic consciousness, and a steady stream of tourists from all over the world visit them. In recognition of that fact, on November 30, 2004, PresidentGeorge W. Bush signed HR 1446, theCalifornia Mission Preservation Act, into law. The measure provided $10 million over a five-year period to the California Missions Foundation for projects related to the physical preservation of the missions, including structural rehabilitation, stabilization, and conservation of mission art and artifacts. The California Missions Foundation, a volunteer, tax-exempt organization, was founded in 1998 by Richard Ameil, an eighth generation Californian.[159] A change to theCalifornia Constitution has also been proposed that would allow the use of State funds in restoration efforts.[160]
On California Missions:
On California history:
On general missionary history:
On colonial Spanish American history:
Apart from a tiny minority who gave the clearest evidence of meaningful conversion... Overall, outright rejection and chronic resistance characterized the Indian response. [...] The Franciscans admitted as much, recording repeatedly the difficulty of convincing adult Indians to accept any aspect of Catholicism.
Between 1770 and 1834 over 90,000 California Indians (a third of the pre-contact population) were enslaved within the Franciscan missions.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite book}}:|author= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
