Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Cage (organisation)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Advocacy organisation
This article needs to beupdated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(November 2016)

Cage
FormationOctober 2003 (2003-10)
TypeAdvocacy organisation with a focus onMuslim detainees
PurposeTo raise awareness of the plight of the detainees held as part of the War on Terror and to "empower communities impacted by the War on Terror"
HeadquartersLondon, England
Director
Adnan Siddiqui[1]
Websitewww.cage.ngo
Formerly called
Cageprisoners

Cage is a London-based advocacy organisation which aims to empower communities impacted by thewar on terror. Cage highlights and campaigns against state policies, developed as part of the War on Terror. The organisation was formed to raise awareness of the plight of detainees held atGuantánamo Bay and elsewhere and has worked closely with former detainees held by the United States and campaigns on behalf of current detainees held without trial.Cage was formerly known as Cageprisoners, and is ordinarily styled as "CAGE".

Activities

[edit]
The cell in which a Guantánamo Bay prisoner was detained. Inset is the prisoners' reading room

Cage campaigns against torture, imprisonment without trial, 'draconian' anti-terror laws and similar issues. Human rights groups have also said that Cage is doing vital work. Cage has spoken out against theUK's anti-terrorism laws.[2]

Cage offers support to those denied due process regarding terrorism offences through casework, advocacy and research. The organisation also documents miscarriages of justice. Cage has developed the trust of Muslims who have been subjected to torture, harassment and other abuses, by informing them of their rights and putting them in touch with lawyers. Cage has also campaigned for the release of hostages held by theIslamic State.[3]

According toThe Guardian newspaper, Cage's campaigns to help former detainees re-integrate into society have been praised byCynthia Stroum, the US Ambassador to Luxembourg.[4]

History

[edit]

Cage's website was launched in October 2003. It was among the leading organisations which worked on publicising the names of the detainees at Guantanamo.[3] Due to the U.S. government's refusal to publish alist of names until aFreedom of Information lawsuit in 2006,[5] it published names, photos and other information about detainees obtained from detainees' families.[6] The U.S. government's refusal impeded the efforts of lawyers who had wished to represent the detainees there.[7] Cage was formerlyCageprisoners Ltd, and is sometimes styled as "CAGE".

CAGE outreach director,Moazzam Begg

Cage's outreach director,Moazzam Begg, is a Briton fromBirmingham who was held for three years by the United States government inextrajudicial detention as a suspectedenemy combatant atBagram inAfghanistan, and theGuantánamo Bay detainment camp inCuba. He was released without charge in 2005.[8] He has worked to represent detainees still held at Guantánamo, as well as to help former detainees re-integrate into society. He has also been working with governments to persuade them to accept non-national former detainees, some of whom have been refused entry by their countries of origin. Begg has played a crucial role in proving UK complicity in US imprisonment and torture in Bagram and elsewhere, and aided detainees seeking admission and compensation from the UK government.

Anwar al-Awlaki address

[edit]
Anwar al-Awlaki

AfterAnwar al-Awlaki's release from Yemeni detention in 2007, Cage invited the cleric to address theirRamadan fundraising dinners in August 2008 (at Wandsworth Civic Centre,South London, by videolink, as he was banned from entering the UK) and August 2009 atKensington Town Hall.[9] U.S. authorities claimed that Awlaki was a recruiter forAl-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, and was involved in the radicalisation of terrorists such asNidal Hassan,Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab,Zachary Adam Chesser,Faisal Shahzad, andRoshonara Choudry.[10] He waskilled by the US in a 2011 drone strike.[11]

Allegations of security service harassment

[edit]

Following themurder of Lee Rigby by Michael Adebolajo in May 2013, Cage reported that Adebolajo had suffered harassment from security services before the offence. A report by theIntelligence and Security Committee of the British parliament later confirmed that the British government may have been complicit in his treatment.[12]

In February 2015,Mohamed Emwazi, a 27-year-old Briton, was identified as the probable masked beheader of civilian captives ofISIS in Syria. Emwazi had, between 2009 and January 2012, been in contact with Cage while in the UK, complaining that he was being harassed by British intelligence agencies.[13] At a press conference the following day, Cage's research director, Asim Qureshi, said Emwazi had been "a beautiful young man"[14] and "extremely kind, gentle and soft-spoken". In Qureshi's view, Emwazi's contact with the UK security services had contributed to his transformation into a killer.[15] "Individuals are prevented from travelling, placed under house arrest and in the worst cases tortured, rendered or killed, seemingly on the whim of security agents." - Cage Prime MinisterDavid Cameron and Mayor of LondonBoris Johnson both decried the suggestion that Emwazi's radicalisation was the fault of British authorities.[16] According to the BBC, "Human rights groups say they [Cage] are doing 'vital work' but critics have called the organisation 'apologists for terror'."[2] TheLabourMember of Parliament (MP)John Spellar encouraged charities which funded Cage to rethink in light of their recent comments.[17] An article published in Open Democracy in July 2015 described media response in relation to Qureshi's comments as 'both overwrought and plainly misleading; not to mention a serious dereliction of the journalistic duty to hold power to account.'.[3] Partly as a result of Qureshi's statement, theCharity Commission pressured charities that had previously funded Cageto cease doing so,[18][19] but changed their position on this in October 2015. Following Emwazi's death in a drone strike in November 2015 in theSyrian Civil War, Cage was among those who expressed dissatisfaction that he had not been brought to trial.[20]

Muhammad Rabbani conviction

[edit]

On 25 September 2017, Muhammad Rabbani, the international director of Cage, was found guilty atWestminsterMagistrates Court of having wilfully obstructed police atHeathrow Airport by refusing to divulge the passwords to his mobile phone and laptop computer. Rabbani was given aconditional discharge for 12 months and ordered to pay £620 costs. Rabbani had been stopped whilst returning fromQatar, where Rabbani said he had interviewed a man to collect evidence for UK lawyers of that man's claims of having been tortured while in US custody. On two previous occasions Rabbani had refused to hand over passwords at ports and airports and had been allowed to pass.[21]Gareth Peirce, Rabbani's solicitor, said the verdict would be challenged in theUK High Court. The verdict confirmed that UK police have the powers under Schedule 7 of theTerrorism Act 2000 to demand access to electronic devices. Rabbani claimed that he had been protecting the confidentiality of his client.[21] Rabbani and Cage described the conviction as a "moral victory" against Schedule 7.[22] The ordeal of Rabbani's arrest and trial is documented in the filmPhantom Parrot.

Libel case againstThe Times

[edit]

In December 2020, Cage and Moazzam Begg received damages of £30,000 plus costs in a libel case they had brought againstThe Times newspaper. In June 2020, a report inThe Times had suggested that Cage and Begg were supporting a man who had been arrested in relation to a knife attack in Reading in which three men were murdered.The Times report also suggested that Cage and Begg were excusing the actions of the accused man by mentioning mistakes made by the police and others. In addition to paying damages,The Times printed an apology. Cage stated that the damages amount would be used to "expose state-sponsored Islamophobia and those complicit with it in the press... The Murdoch press empire has actively supported xenophobic elements and undermined principles of open society and accountability... We will continue to shine a light on war criminals and torture apologists and press barons who fan the flames of hate".[23]

Michael Gove statement

[edit]

On 14 March 2024,Michael Gove,Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, speaking in Parliament, said CAGE was one of five organisations that would be assessed against the new UK Government definition ofextremism.[24]

Charitable funding

[edit]

Between 2007 and 2014, theJoseph Rowntree Charitable Trust gave grants to Cage totalling £271,250. In a similar period, the Roddick Foundation, founded byAnita Roddick, gave grants totalling £120,000. In 2015, following pressure from the UK government'sCharity Commission, both entities agreed to cease funding Cage. The Charity Commission had said that "Given the nature of [Cage’s] work, and the controversy it has attracted, the Charity Commission has been concerned that such funding risked damaging public trust and confidence in charity".[18]

The Rowntree Trust said the Charity Commission had applied "acute regulatory pressure" and had threatened to institute an exhaustive investigation into the Trust if it refused to stop funding CAGE.[25] The Trust stated that "We believe (Cage) has played an important role in highlighting the ongoing abuses at Guantanamo Bay and at many other sites around the world, including many instances of torture".[17] Cage said that the majority of their income comes from private individuals and that the group "would continue its work regardless of the criticism levelled at it ... even though we aren't a proselytizing organisation, we are a Muslim response to a problem that largely affects Muslims".[17]

In October 2015, following an application forjudicial review by Cage, the Charity Commission changed its position and said it would not in future interfere in the discretion of charities to choose to fund Cage. The judicial review heard evidence thatTheresa Villiers, a British Cabinet Minister, and US intelligence had both applied pressure on the charity commission to investigate Cage, with US intelligence agents describing Cage as a "jihadist front".[25]

See also

[edit]

External links

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^"Meet our team". Cage. Archived fromthe original on 26 November 2016. Retrieved25 November 2016.
  2. ^abMcMicking, Henrietta (27 February 2015)."Cage: Important human rights group or apologists for terror?".BBC News.Archived from the original on 20 March 2017. Retrieved19 March 2017.
  3. ^abc"Apologists for terror or defenders of human rights? The Cage controversy in context".openDemocracy.Archived from the original on 14 December 2021. Retrieved14 December 2021.
  4. ^MacAskill, Ewen (30 November 2010)."WikiLeaks cables show US U-turn over ex-Guantánamo inmate".The Guardian. London.Archived from the original on 7 February 2017. Retrieved11 December 2016.
  5. ^"U.S. Reveals Identities of Detainees".The New York Times. Associated Press. 4 March 2006.ISSN 0362-4331.Archived from the original on 14 December 2021. Retrieved14 December 2021.
  6. ^"Names of the Detained in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba".The Washington Post. 15 March 2006.Archived from the original on 9 November 2012.
  7. ^Rosenberg, Carol (15 June 2021)."An Updated Tool for Tracking the Detainees of Guantánamo Bay".The New York Times.ISSN 0362-4331.Archived from the original on 14 December 2021. Retrieved14 December 2021.
  8. ^Golden, Tim (15 June 2006)."Jihadist or Victim: Ex-Detainee Makes a Case".The New York Times.Archived from the original on 31 March 2014.
  9. ^Sawer, Patrick, and Barrett, David,"Detroit bomber's mentor continues to influence British mosques and universities",The Telegraph, 2 January 2010, accessed 15 November 2016.
  10. ^Meleagrou-Hitchens, Alexander (2020).Incitement: Anwar Al-Awlaki's Western Jihad. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. pp. 165–188,189–208,209–235.ISBN 9780674246911.
  11. ^"Two U.S.-Born Terrorists Killed in CIA-Led Drone Strike".Fox News. 30 September 2011. Archived fromthe original on 30 September 2011.
  12. ^"Cage: the campaigners put in the spotlight by Mohammed Emwazi".the Guardian. 26 February 2015.Archived from the original on 14 December 2021. Retrieved14 December 2021.
  13. ^Ramesh, Randeep; Jalabi, Raya (3 March 2015)."Mohammed Emwazi tapes: '9/11 was wrong'".The Guardian.Archived from the original on 19 March 2017. Retrieved19 March 2017.
  14. ^"IS 'Jihadi John' suspect 'a beautiful young man' – Cage".BBC. 26 February 2015.Archived from the original on 30 May 2016. Retrieved21 June 2018.
  15. ^"'Jihadi John' Used To Be 'Kind And Gentle'".Sky News. 27 February 2015. Archived fromthe original on 27 February 2015. Retrieved27 February 2015.
  16. ^"Jihadi John: Activist who praised Mohammed Emwazi as "beautiful" caught on video backing jihad".The Telegraph. 27 February 2015.Archived from the original on 20 August 2018. Retrieved3 April 2018.
  17. ^abc"Charities that funded Cage, one time supporter of IS's Emwazi, under pressure".Reuters. 4 March 2015. Archived fromthe original on 5 March 2015.
  18. ^ab"Charities sever ties with pressure group Cage over Mohammed Emwazi links".The Guardian. 6 March 2015.Archived from the original on 21 December 2016. Retrieved11 December 2016.
  19. ^"Amnesty International considers cutting links with pressure group Cage".The Guardian. 2 March 2015.Archived from the original on 22 January 2017. Retrieved11 December 2016.
  20. ^"Jihadi John 'dead': Jeremy Corbyn says 'far better' if militant had been tried in court rather than killed".The Independent. 14 November 2015.Archived from the original on 1 December 2017. Retrieved19 September 2017.
  21. ^abBowcott, Owen (25 September 2017)."Campaign group chief found guilty of refusing to divulge passwords Campaign group chief found guilty of refusing to divulge passwords".The Guardian.Archived from the original on 8 November 2017. Retrieved20 November 2017.
  22. ^"Rabbani Trial Reactions: A Moral Victory Against Schedule 7". Cage. 27 September 2017.Archived from the original on 1 December 2017. Retrieved28 November 2017.
  23. ^Sabin, Lamiat (4 December 2020)."The Times pays £30k damages over article defaming Muslim activists".Morning Star.Archived from the original on 7 December 2020. Retrieved8 December 2020.
  24. ^"Gove names groups as he outlines new extremism definition in Commons".BBC News. 14 March 2024. Retrieved14 March 2024. (Posted at 12:18 pm)
  25. ^abRamesh, Randeep (21 October 2015)."Charities can fund Cage campaign group, commission agrees".The Guardian.Archived from the original on 1 December 2017. Retrieved28 November 2017.
Controversies surrounding people captured during thewar on terror
Guantanamo Bay
detention camp
CIAblack site operations
Prison and detainee abuse
Prison uprisings
and escapes
Deaths in custody
Tortured
Forced disappearances
Reports and legal developments
Related media
Participants
Operational
Targets
Individuals
Factions
Conflicts
Operation
Enduring Freedom
Other
Policies
Related
International
National
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cage_(organisation)&oldid=1307448612"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp