Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

CDU/CSU

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Centre-right political alliance in Germany
icon
This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "CDU/CSU" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR
(January 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

CDU/CSU
Chairmen
Parliamentary leaderJens Spahn (CDU/CSU Group)
Founded1949; 76 years ago (1949)
Youth wingYoung Union
Ideology
Political positionCentre-right
European affiliationEuropean People's Party
European Parliament groupEuropean People's Party Group
International affiliationInternational Democracy Union
Alliance parties
Colours
  •   Blue (official)[a]
  •   Black (customary)
Bundestag
208 / 630
State Parliaments
616 / 1,894
European Parliament
29 / 96
Heads of State Governments
8 / 16
Website
www.cducsu.deEdit this at Wikidata

CDU/CSU, unofficially theUnion parties (German:Unionsparteien[uˈni̯oːnspaʁˌtaɪən]) or theUnion, is acentre-right[1]Christian democratic[2] andconservative[3]political alliance of twopolitical parties inGermany: theChristian Democratic Union of Germany (CDU) and theChristian Social Union in Bavaria (CSU).

The CSU contests elections only inBavaria, while the CDU operates in the other 15states of Germany. The CSU also reflects the particular concerns of the largely rural, Catholicsouth.[4] While the two Christian Democratic parties are commonly described as sister parties, they have shared a common parliamentary group, the CDU/CSU Parliamentary Group, in the GermanBundestag[5] (German:CDU/CSU-Fraktion im Deutschen Bundestag)[6] since the foundation of theFederal Republic of Germany in 1949. According to German Federal Electoral Law, members of a parliamentary group which share the same basic political aims must not compete with one another in any federal state.[7]

The parties themselves officially remain completely independent with their own leadership and only few issue- or age-based joint organisations, which makes the alliance informal. However, in practice the committees of the parties harmonise their decisions with each other and the two parties run behind a common candidate forChancellor, and the leader of one party is usually invited to party conventions of the other party.

Both the CDU and CSU are members of theEuropean People's Party and theInternational Democracy Union. Both parties sit in theEuropean People's Party Group in theEuropean Parliament. The CDU and CSU share a common youth organisation, theYoung Union, a common pupil organisation, thePupil Union of Germany [de], a common student organisation, theAssociation of Christian Democratic Students and a commonMittelstand organisation, theMittelstand and Business association [de].

History

[edit]
Part ofa series on
Christian democracy

Predecessors

[edit]

Both the CDU and the CSU were established afterWorld War II and share a perspective based onChristian democracy andconservatism and hold the dominantcentre-right position in the German political spectrum. The CSU is usually considered the de facto successor of theWeimar Republic–eraBavarian People's Party (BVP), which itself broke away from the all-German CatholicCentre Party (DZP) afterWorld War I, but the CSU included also parts of theagrarian andliberalBavarian Peasants' League and parts of the Bavarian wing of theGerman People's Party (DVP). However the CDU's foundation was the result of a major re-organisation of the centre-right political camp compared to the Weimar Republic. Although the CDU was largely built as thede facto successor of the Centre Party, it successfully opened up to non-Catholic Christians (many of them affiliated with theGerman People's Party until 1933) and successfully asserted itself as the only major conservative party (outside of Bavaria) against initial competition from other Catholic, Protestant ornational conservative parties such as theGerman Party during the early years of the Federal Republic.

The BVP became the sister party of the DZP and they did not compete against each other except for theMay 1924 German federal election, the1924 Bavarian state election and the1925 German presidential election. The DZP and BVP were mostly jointly represented at the Imperial governments. Similarly to the modern CDU/CSU split, the Bavarian People's Party was generally seen as the party further to the political right, as evidenced by the 1925 second round of the presidential election when the Center Party backedRhenish Catholic andWeimar Coalition candidateWilhelm Marx while the BVP made common cause with the monarchist and nationalist parties in backing Prussianjunker and former generalPaul von Hindenburg despite him being a Protestant and the long-standing mutual animosity between Bavaria and Prussia.

For short periods of time, there existed

Alliance for Germany was a coalition for the1990 East German general election consisting of the CDU, the DSU andDemocratic Awakening which merged into the CDU.

CSU ambitions to become a nationwide party

[edit]
CSU party rally in June 1976. On the rightFranz Josef Strauß, the CSU leader since 1961, on the leftHelmut Kohl, leader of the federal CDU since 1973 and main candidate for thegeneral elections in October 1976.

During the 1970s and then again after 2015, several CSU leaders have expressed the wish to make the CSU a truly independent party without formal ties to the CDU. Usually they combined this wish with an expansion to the rest of Germany.

After 1969, CDU and CSU were in the opposition in the Bundestag. CDU leader Kohl wanted to win the liberalFDP again for a coalition with the CDU/CSU, while the CSU leader Strauß had different plans. He aimed for a right wing majority without the FDP. Additionally, Strauß thought little of the current CDU leader Kohl, a more moderate Christian Democrat.

Strauß believed that CDU and CSU should be separate national parties to address different audience: the CDU the moderate, social and liberal voters, the CSU the conservative voters. After the elections they should still form a government together.

In 1975, the federal CDU declared Kohl to be the next CDU/CSU chancellor candidate for the 1976 general elections – without consulting the CSU.[8] Kohl did well in the elections on 3 October 1976, althoughSocial Democrats and FDP had still enough seats to continue their coalition. Kohl decided to leave his post as prime minister of the state of Rhineland-Palatinate for the chairmanship of the CDU/CSU Bundestag faction.

TheHans-Seidel-Stiftung is a political foundation linked to the CSU. From 1975 to 2016, it had an educational centre in this building in the municipality ofKreuth, close to the Austrian border. For decades,spirit of Kreuth was a reference to an independent, conservative CSU.

In November that year, the 49 CSU Bundestag members gathered in the party's educational centre inWildbad Kreuth, Southern Bavaria. 30 of them voted for a proposal to form a CSU Bundestag parliamentary group of its own. CDU leader Kohl was informed only later via the media.[9] This 'Kreuth separation decision'(Kreuther Trennungsbeschluss) was a major political earthquake and caused the CDU to react swiftly and resolutely. Kohl threatened the CSU by preparing the creation of a CDU party organization in Bavaria. In March 1977, theCDU Bayern was supposed to be founded in Nuremberg.[10]

During the conflict, theAktionsgemeinschaft Vierte Partei [de], theBund Freies Deutschland [de] (West-Berlin), theChristlich Soziale Wähler Union [de] (Saarland), theVierte Partei Deutschlands – Union für Umwelt und Lebensschutz [de] (Lower Saxony), theDeutsche Union [de] (North Rhine-Westphalia) and thePartei Freier Bürger [de] (Bremen) were founded. On 12 December 1976, the vote was rescinded after the CDU had threatened in turn to form local associations within Bavaria and to run in Bavarian elections against the CSU.

Strauß himself polemicised against Kohl in a closed CSU meeting on 24 November (thisWienerwald speech was leaked, and published on 29 November inDer Spiegel):

That Helmut Kohl will never become chancellor. Being 90 he will write his memoirs: 'I was chancellor candidate for 40 years; lessons and experiences from bitter times.' The last chapter written maybe in Siberia or elsewhere.

— Franz Josef Strauß[11]

It turned out that most local CSU leaders and also conservative CDU state leaders did not approve a separation between CSU and CDU. The CSU Bundestag members revoked their decision. On 7 December, the CDU/CSU Bundestag group elected Kohl as its chairman.[12] In 1980, Strauß was the joint CDU/CSU chancellor candidate and lost more than 4 percent of the votes. This ended his ambitions for a federal CSU.

Tensions in 2016–2021

[edit]
TheMunich scandal of November 2015:Horst Seehofer, CSU leader and Bavarian minister-president, with CDU leader and chancellorAngela Merkel, at the 2015 CSU party rally. At this occasion, Seehofer humiliated his guest by letting her stand next to him for minutes while he lamented her liberal politics with regard to refugees.[13]

Under the chairmanship ofAngela Merkel (2000–2018), the CDU left some right wing positions behind and shifted more to the political centre. Especially the2015 refugee crisis divided the German population and caused conflict between the CDU and the CSU.

Therefore, a federal CSU was discussed again among party members and journalists. For example, conservativeWelt columnistAnsgar Graw wrote in 2016 that CDU and CSU lost its stance as alaw and order party. As Merkel's CDU could not move to the right without losing credibility, Graw called the CSU to become a federal party, a right wing party that rigorously deports asylum seekers without right to stay.[14] On the contrary, former CSU leaderTheo Waigel warned against a separate election campaign. In such a campaign, CDU and CSU would fight much more each other than the rest of the parties.[15]

Main article:2018 German government crisis

In 2018,Interior MinisterHorst Seehofer, a former Minister-President of Bavaria and the leader of the CSU, opposed CDUChancellorAngela Merkel's policy on Syrian refugees in Germany. Seehofer hoped to place restrictions on incoming refugees, many of whom enter the country through Bavaria. His stance was seen as being in part motivated by the2018 Bavarian state election in which it was feared that thefar-rightAlternative for Germany would make gains. The dispute threatened to bring down theMerkel government which relied on the CSU for its parliamentary majority as Seehofer had indicated his resignation on 2 July, but he already rescinded it a day later after an agreement over the issue between the coalition parties (the CDU, the CSU and the SPD) had been reached.[16]

In June 2018, CDU and CSU Bundestag members held separate meetings on the topic of refugees, which was highly unusual. A fake Twitter account announced that CSU leaderSeehofer had abolished the CDU/CSU alliance and that CDU vice chairBouffier had called for a CDU in Bavaria. Many journalists published the news, which was interpreted by theMünchner Merkur as a sign that such events are considered no longer absurd or unlikely.[17] Political scientist Heinrich Oberreuter did not believe in Seehofer's threat to expand the CSU to the rest of Germany. Both parties aim essentially for the same voters. As separate parties in the general elections both would lose voters. The CSU would lose its unique selling point as a Bavarian party. With a CDU in Bavaria, the CSU would fall from 47 to 30 percent in Bavaria.[18]

A federal CSU was again discussed prior to the general elections of 2021. CSU leaderMarkus Söder was unhappy about the CDU decision to declare CDU leader Armin Laschet the chancellor candidate and successor of Angela Merkel. In September 2020, the CSU created online memberships for people not living in Bavaria. A survey in May 2021 foresaw that a federal CSU may win at least 9 percent of the votes, especially in Eastern Germany and among FDP voters.[19]

Both parties suffered heavy losses in elections after 2017. In the Bavarian state elections of October 2018, the CSU lost 10.5 percent. With 37.2 percent, this was its worst election result since 1950. In the federal elections of 2021, the CDU lost 7.9 percent and the CSU 1.0 percent of the (party list) votes.

2025 comeback

[edit]
Main article:2025 German federal election
CDU/CSU support in the2025 German federal election

Following the federal election which was heldon February 23, 2025, the CDU was projected to recapture the most seats in the German parliament, with the CDU/CSU alliance expected to return to power. CDU leaderFriedrich Merz will most likely serve as the German chancellor.[20][21]

Political stances

[edit]

The CDU and the CSU usually only differ slightly in their political stances. The CSU is usually considered more socially conservative (especially on family issues, e.g. the CSU favors providing infants' parents with compensation (Betreuungsgeld) if they intend not to use the public day nursery system to work[22] while the CDU favors public funding of day nurseries). The CSU government in Bavaria has implemented one of the strictestregulations for shopping hours in Germany in order to protect employees. The CSU also strongly opposed ideas of an income unrelated system of contributions to public health insurances, a proposal which met a lot of approval in the CDU in 2010.[23]

CSU politicians often make their mark as self-declared defenders of Bavaria's state rights and cultural independence from federal orEuropean Union bureaucrats, even in times of conservative federal governments or conservative presidents of theEuropean Commission. In 1998, then-ChancellorHelmut Kohl of the CDU had to pressure the CSU intensely not to veto the introduction of theeuro as the new currency in Germany.[24] On the other hand, the name euro was the idea of former CSU chairmanTheo Waigel, who served as finance minister when the euro was introduced and held a very pro-European position in contrast to the Bavarian government ofEdmund Stoiber. Since 2016, the CSU has strongly been advocating the idea of a maximum number (Obergrenze) of 200,000 people per year to limit the number of asylum seekers. This is opposed by the CDU because they claim that it is impossible to limit the number through border control.[25]

While both parties officially identify themselves asnon-denominational Christian, theCatholic influence on the CSU is stronger than that on the CDU since Bavaria is predominantly Catholic while Christians in Germany as a whole are approximately equally balanced between Catholics and Protestants. There are nevertheless strong regional differences within Bavaria and Germany as a whole with large predominantly Protestant areas in northern Bavaria and large predominantly Catholic areas inNorth Rhine-Westphalia and South Western Germany having a strong effect on CDU state politicians.Saarland's former CDU Minister-PresidentAnnegret Kramp-Karrenbauer heavily opposed same-sex marriages in July 2017 while the CDU inSchleswig-Holstein was in favor, with Saarland having the largest share of Catholic Christians in any German state.

Forms of cooperation

[edit]

CDU and CSU are two separate parties with separate organization. While the CDU is a federal party with members and local affiliations in 15 of the 16 German states, the CSU has members and affiliations only in Bavaria. (CSU online members live outside of Bavaria but have no vote within the party.) Also, the CDU runs only in regional and local elections outside of Bavaria. Both parties do have party lists for the general (federal) elections to the Bundestag: the CDU has 15 lists in each of the 15 non-Bavarian states, the CSU only in Bavaria.

Since 1972, both parties agreed a joint election manifesto for the federal elections. Sometimes the CSU additionally published a manifesto of its own.[26] Both parties always gather behind a joint candidate for the chancellorship. There is no approved procedure to select this candidate, creating tensions between both parties from time to time. During the federal campaign, the CSU may decide to present mainly Bavarian candidates on the election posters and not the CDU joint chancellor candidate,[27] and the popular candidates of the CDU may decide not to show up in the Bavarian campaign.

Both parties together form a parliamentary group (Fraktion) in the Bundestag. Such aFraktionsgemeinschaft is legal because both parties are no competition of each other during the elections (the voters can nowhere decide between a CDU and a CSU candidate). TheFraktionsgemeinschaft (parliamentary group alliance) works on the basis of aFraktionsvertrag (parliamentary group agreement) with some special provisions for the CSU, e.g. with regard to speaking time in the Bundestag.

The parliamentary group has one chair and one or more vice chairs (12 in the 2021 Bundestag). The chair has always been a CDU member. The First Deputy chair isex officio the leader of theCSU-Landesgruppe. TheFraktion is divided into 16Landesgruppen (state groups), comprising theFraktion members per state. TheCSU-Landesgruppenchef is considered one of the most prolific members of the Bundestag parliamentary group. Historically, most of these politicians have become members of the federal government.

CDU and CSU always take part in coalition negotiations together, although they behave like two different parties. Both parties join a federal government coalition together; there has never been only one of them in government. At least one major government department is 'given' to the CSU. In the past, the CSU often lead the departments for postal services (when this ministry still existed), transportation, constructions, or agriculture.

InEuropean elections, CDU and CSU have separate party lists. In the European Parliament, they form a group within the parliamentary group of theEuropean People's Party.

Leaders of the Group in the Bundestag

[edit]

Electoral history

[edit]

Federal Parliament (Bundestag)

[edit]
ElectionCandidateConstituencyParty listSeats+/–Status
Votes%Votes%
1949Konrad Adenauer7,359,08431.0
139 / 402
CDU/CSU–FDPDP
195312,027,94543.712,443,98145.2
249 / 509
Increase 110CDU/CSU–FDPDP
195715,161,55050.315,008,39950.2
277 / 519
Increase 28CDU/CSU–DP(1957–1960)
CDU/CSU(1960–1961)
196114,727,73746.014,298,37245.3
251 / 521
Decrease 26CDU/CSU–FDP
1965Ludwig Erhard15,835,96748.815,524,06847.6
251 / 518
SteadyCDU/CSU–FDP(1965–1966)
CDU/CSU–SPD(1966–1969)
1969Kurt Georg Kiesinger15,231,32446.615,195,18746.1
250 / 518
Decrease 1Opposition
1972Rainer Barzel16,925,43845.416,806,02044.9
234 / 518
Decrease 16Opposition
1976Helmut Kohl18,431,67148.918,394,80148.6
254 / 518
Increase 20Opposition
1980Franz Josef Strauss17,408,57246.016,897,65944.5
237 / 519
Decrease 17Opposition(1980–82)
CDU/CSU–FDP(1982–83)
1983Helmut Kohl20,262,26052.218,998,54548.8
255 / 520
Increase 18CDU/CSU–FDP
198718,027,77147.816,761,57244.3
234 / 519
Decrease 21CDU/CSU–FDP
199021,131,47845.720,358,09643.8
319 / 662
Increase 85CDU/CSU–FDP
199421,130,95245.119,517,15641.4
294 / 672
Decrease 25CDU/CSU–FDP
199819,456,68739.617,329,38835.1
245 / 669
Decrease 49Opposition
2002Edmund Stoiber19,647,69041.118,482,64138.5
248 / 603
Increase 3Opposition
2005Angela Merkel19,280,94040.816,631,04935.2
226 / 614
Decrease 22CDU/CSU–SPD
200917,047,67439.214,658,51533.8
239 / 622
Increase 13CDU/CSU–FDP
201319,777,72145.318,165,44641.5
311 / 631
Increase 72CDU/CSU–SPD
201717,286,23837.315,317,34432.9
246 / 709
Decrease 65CDU/CSU–SPD
2021Armin Laschet13,233,96828.611,177,74624.1
197 / 735
Decrease 50Opposition
2025Friedrich Merz15,876,24832.114,160,40228.5
208 / 630
Increase 11CDU/CSU–SPD

European Parliament

[edit]
ElectionVotes%Seats+/–EP Group
197913,700,20549.2
40 / 78
EPP
198411,417,54146.0
39 / 78
Decrease 1
198910,659,12337.7
31 / 78
Decrease 8
199413,739,44738.8
47 / 99
Increase 15
199913,168,23148.7
53 / 99
Increase 6EPP-ED
200411,476,89744.5
49 / 99
Decrease 4
20099,968,15337.9
42 / 99
Decrease 7EPP
201410,374,75835.4
34 / 96
Decrease 8
201910,791,91028.9
29 / 96
Decrease 5
202411,944,86730.0
29 / 96
Steady

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^Since 2021

References

[edit]
  1. ^"Austria Greens in spotlight after strong election gains".RTL.Agence France-Presse. 30 September 2019. Retrieved30 September 2019.
  2. ^Ezrow, Lawrence (2011)."Electoral systems and party responsiveness". In Norman Schofield; Gonzalo Caballero (eds.).Political Economy of Institutions, Democracy and Voting. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 320.ISBN 978-3-642-19519-8.
  3. ^Alipour, Nick (11 August 2023)."Road to the chancellery: German conservatives battle for top position".Euractiv. Retrieved18 May 2024.
  4. ^"Christian Democrat Union/Christian Social Union". Country Studies, Germany. Retrieved 18 December 2016.
  5. ^"Christian Democratic Union/Christian Social Union (CDU/CSU) parliamentary group". GermanBundestag. Retrieved7 November 2017.
  6. ^"Christian Democratic Union/Christian Social Union (CDU/CSU) parliamentary group". GermanBundestag. Retrieved7 November 2017.
  7. ^"Federal Electoral Law".German Law Archive. Archived fromthe original on 29 May 2023. Retrieved18 December 2016.
  8. ^Schwarz, Hans Peter (2012).Helmut Kohl. Eine politische Biographie. Munich: DVA. p. 228.
  9. ^Schwarz, Hans Peter (2012).Helmut Kohl. Eine politische Biographie. Munich: DVA. pp. 249/250.
  10. ^Schwarz, Hans Peter (2012).Helmut Kohl. Eine politische Biographie. Munich: DVA. pp. 251–254.
  11. ^Winkler, Heinrich August (2002).Der lange Weg nach Westen: Deutsche Geschichte vom "Dritten Reich" bis zur Wiedervereinigung. Vol. 2 (4th ed.). Munich: C. H. Beck. p. 342.
  12. ^Schwarz, Hans Peter (2012).Helmut Kohl. Eine politische Biographie. Munich: DVA. pp. 254/256.
  13. ^Birnbaum, Robert (20 November 2015)."Der Eklat von München". tagesspiegel. Retrieved9 May 2022.
  14. ^Ansgar Graw:Lasst die CSU bundesweit antreten! In: Welt Online. 16 October 2017, last seen 9 May 2022.
  15. ^"Waigel nennt bundesweite CSU "Katastrophe für die Union"". Tagesspiegel. 12 May 2017.
  16. ^Kingsley, Patrick (18 June 2018)."As Europe's Liberal Order Splinters, Trump Wields an Ax".The New York Times. Retrieved 17 October 2018.
  17. ^Florian Neumann:"Dann können wir das Licht ausmachen": CSU-Politiker hoffen und bangen im Asyl-Streit. In: Merkur.de. 16 June 2018, last seen 9 May 2022.
  18. ^Experte: "Bundesweite Ausdehnung würde die CSU 15 Prozent in Bayern kosten". In: Focus.de. 12 June 2018, last seen 9 May 2022.
  19. ^CSU käme auf mindestens 9 Prozent. In: FAZ.net. dpa, 4 May 2021, last seen 9 May 2022.
  20. ^"German exit polls: Clear win for Merz's centre-right CDU/CSU". 23 February 2025.
  21. ^"Merz warns Europe should seek 'independence' from US after conservatives win German election - and far-right support surges". 23 February 2025.
  22. ^"Care money a complete success".csu.de (in German). Retrieved25 September 2017.
  23. ^"CDU health experts Spahn: Reform is an opportunity for black and yellow".sueddeutsche.de (in German). 3 June 2010.ISSN 0174-4917. Retrieved25 September 2017.
  24. ^Wirtgen, Klaus (13 October 1997)."The Stoiber system".Der Spiegel. Vol. 42. Retrieved25 September 2017.
  25. ^"CSU chief Seehofer pounds on upper limit".Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. 29 July 2017. Retrieved25 September 2017.
  26. ^CSU-Programme zu den Bundestagswahlen, Hans-Seidel-Stiftung, last seen 9 May 2022.
  27. ^Luisa Billmayer:"Nicht nur den Armin zeigen": Söder will für die Bundestagswahl offenbar auch eigene Plakate. In: Frankfurter Rundschau, 16 May 2021, last seen 9 May 2022.

External links

[edit]
Represented in theBundestag
(630 seats)
Represented in the
European Parliament
(96 seats for Germany)
Major parties
Minor parties
Represented in the
16state parliaments
(1,891 seats)
Major parties
Regional parties
Minor parties
Minor parties
(without representation
at the state level or above)
Notes:
Authority control databasesEdit this at Wikidata
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=CDU/CSU&oldid=1322725077"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp