 | This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Burchardi flood" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(October 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
.jpg) Contemporary picture of the flood | |
| Meteorological history | |
|---|---|
| Duration | 11–12 October 1634 |
| Overall effects | |
| Fatalities | 8,000–15,000 |
| Areas affected | North Frisia,Dithmarschen,Hamburg area, southwestJutland |
TheBurchardi flood (also known as the secondGrote Mandrenke) was astorm tide that struck theNorth Sea coast ofNorth Frisia,Dithmarschen (in modern-dayGermany) and southwestJutland (in modern-dayDenmark) on the night between 11 and 12 October 1634. Overrunning dikes, it shattered the coastline and caused thousands of deaths (8,000 to 15,000 people drowned) and catastrophic material damage. Much of the island ofStrand washed away, forming the islandsNordstrand,Pellworm and severalhalligen.
The Burchardi flood hitSchleswig-Holstein during a period of economic weakness. In 1603 aplague epidemic spread across the land, killing many. The flooding occurred during theThirty Years' War, which also did not spare Schleswig-Holstein. Fighting had occurred between locals and the troops ofFrederick III, Duke of Holstein-Gottorp, especially on Strand Island. The people of Strand were resisting changes to their old defence treaties and the forced accommodation of troops. Supported by a Danish expeditionary fleet, they succeeded in repulsing first an imperial army and later the duke's men, but were eventually defeated in 1629. The island and subsequently also the means ofcoastal protection suffered from the strife.
The Burchardi flood was merely the last in a series of floods that hit the coastline of Schleswig-Holstein in that period. In 1625, great ice-floats had already caused major damage to thedikes.[1] Several storm floods are reported by the chronicles during the years prior to 1634; the fact that the dikes did not hold even during summer provides evidence for their insufficient maintenance.
While the weather had been calm for weeks prior to the flood, a strong storm occurred from the east on the evening of 11 October 1634[2] which turned southwest during the evening and developed into aEuropean windstorm from the northwest. The most comprehensive report is preserved from Dutch hydraulic engineerJan Leeghwater who was tasked withland reclamation in a part of theDagebüll bay. He writes:[3]
In the evening a great storm and bad weather rose from the southwest out of the sea. ... The wind began to blow so hard that no sleep could touch our eyes. When we had been lying in bed for about an hour my son said to me, 'Father, I feel water dripping into my face'. The waves were rising up at the sea dike and onto the roof of the house. It was a very frightening sound.
Leeghwater and his son fled over the dike towards a manor which was situated on higher terrain while the water had almost reached the top of the dike. At the time there were 38 persons in that manor, 20 of whom were refugees from lower lands. He continues:[4]
The wind turned somewhat to the northwest and blew plainly against the manor, so hard and stiff as I had never experienced in my life. On a strong door on the western side of the building the lock bars sprang out of the posts due to the sea waves, so that the water doused the [hearth] fire and ran into the corridors and over my knee boots, about 13 feet higher than the May floods of the old land. ... At the northern edge of the house which stood close to thetidal channel, the earth was washed away from underneath the house. ... Therefore the house, the hallway and the floor burst into pieces. ... It seemed that the manor and all those inside were doomed to be washed off the dike. In the morning, ... the tents and huts that had been standing all across the estate were washed away, thirty-six or thirty-seven in number, with all the people who had been inside. Great sea ships were standing high upon the dike as I have seen myself. In Husum, several ships were standing upon the highway. I have also ridden there along the beach and have seen wondrous things, many different dead beasts, beams of houses, smashed wagons and an awful lot of wood, straw and stubbles. And I have also seen many a human body who had drowned.
The witness Peter Sax fromKoldenbüttel described the scenario as follows:[5]
...at six o'clock at night the Lord God began to fulminate with wind and rain from the east; at seven He turned the wind to the southwest and let it blow so strong that hardly any man could walk or stand; at eight and nine all dikes were already smitten... The Lord God [sent] thunder, rain, hail lightning and such a powerful wind that the Earth's foundation was shaken... at ten o'clock everything was over.
In combination with half aspring tide, the wind was pushing the water against the coastline with such a force that the first dike broke in the Stintebüll parish on Strand island at 10 p.m. About two hours past midnight the water had reached its peak level. Contemporary reports write of a water level on the mainland of ca. 4 metres (13 ft) above mean high tide, which is only slightly below the all-time highest flood level that was recorded atHusum during the 1976 flood with 4.11 metres (13 ft) above mean high tide.[citation needed]
The water rose so high that not only were the dikes destroyed but also houses in the shallow marshlands and even those onartificial dwelling hills were flooded. Some houses collapsed while others were set on fire due to unattended fireplaces.
In this night the dikes broke at several hundred locations along the North Sea coastline of Schleswig-Holstein and southwestern Jutland. Estimations of fatalities range from 8,000 to 15,000. 8,000 local victims are counted by contemporary sources and from comparisons ofparish registers. The actual number might be much higher, though, because according to Anton Heimreich'sNordfriesische Chronik "many alien threshers and working people had been in the land whose number could just not be accounted for with certainty."[6]
On Strand alone at least 6,123 people (or 2/3 of the entire population of the island) and 50,000 livestock lost their lives due to 44 dike breaches. The water destroyed 1,300 houses and 30 mills. All 21 churches on Strand were heavily damaged, 17 of which were completely destroyed. Almost the entire new harvest was lost. And the island of Strand was torn apart, forming the smaller islandsNordstrand andPellworm and thehalligen Südfall and Nordstrandischmoor. The Nübbel and Nielandhalligen were submerged in the sea.
On theEiderstedt peninsula, 2,107 people and 12,802 livestock drowned and 664 houses were destroyed by the flood according to Heimreich's chronicle. Heimreich counts 383 dead inDithmarschen. 168 people died, 1,360 livestock were lost, and 102 houses "drifted away" died in Busen parish (today'sBüsum) and the areas along the mouth of theriver Eider. Numerous people were killed in the coastal marshlands and victims were recorded even in settlements in the back-country likeBargum,Breklum,Almdorf orBohmstedt. Even inHamburg dikes broke in theHammerbrook andWilhelmsburg quarters. In Lower-Saxony, the dike ofHove broke at a length of 900 m.
The ambitious project by the Dukes of Gottorp to shut off the bay of Dagebüll, today'sBökingharde, with one single, large dike, which had been progressing after ten years of hard work, was now finally destroyed by the flood. Fagebüll and Fahretoft (which were stillhalligen back then) suffered great losses of land and lives. The church ofOckholm was destroyed and the sea dike had to be relocated landwards.
In southwestern Jutland, the Danish town ofRibe (a historically very important location and the main and largest town in that region) was entirely flooded and all dikes were penetrated. TheRibe Cathedral, which is located at a high point in the town that isc. 4 m (13 ft) above normal sea level, was flooded by 1.6–1.8 m (5–6 ft) of water.[7] Although southwestern Jutland has experienced several severe floods, this is the highest ever recorded (also exceeding the historicalSaint Marcellus's flood and the modernCyclone Anatol flood) and today it is marked as the top point on a flood pillar in Ribe. Markings after the flood can also still be seen on the cathedral's walls.[8][9] Limited data is available on the number of fatalities, but inNørre Farup parish (just north of Ribe) about half the population drowned and there were records of people drowning as far as inland asSeem, normally located 14 km (8.7 mi) from the sea.[7]
The Burchardi flood had especially severe consequences for Strand island where large parts of the land were lying below sea level. For weeks and months after the flood the water did not run off. Due to tidal currents the size of the dike breaches increased and several dike lines were eventually completely washed into the sea. This meant that a lot of arable land which had still been worked on directly after the flood had to be abandoned in later times because it could not be kept against the intruding sea. Saline sea water frequently submerged the fields of Strand so that they could no longer be used for agriculture.
M. Löbedanz, the preacher of Gaikebüll, describes the situation on Nordstrand after the flood:[10]
More than half of the dwelling places have been wasted and the houses have been washed away. Wasted are the other houses and windows, doors and walls are broken: wasted are entire parishes and in many of those only few houseowners are left: wasted are the Lord's houses, and neither preachers nor houseowners are left in numbers to frequent them.
In cultural terms, theOld Nordstrand variety of theNorth Frisian language was lost. The number of victims who spoke the idiom was too high and moreover many islanders moved their homes to the mainland or the higherhallig Nordstrandischmoor – against the order of Duke Frederick III.
By 1637 dikes on Pellworm were restored for 1,800hectares of land. On Nordstrand however, the remaining farmers lived on dwelling hills like thehallig people and were hardly able to cultivate their fields. Despite several orders by the Duke, they failed in restoring the dikes. According to the Nordstrand dike law, those who could not secure land against the sea with dikes forfeit it. Finally the Duke enforced the Frisian law ofDe nich will dieken, de mutt wieken (Low German:"Who does not want to build a dike, shall lose ground"),expropriated the locals and attracted foreign settlers with acharter that promised land and considerable privileges to investors in dikes, like the sovereignty of policing and justice. One such investor was the Dutch entrepreneur Quirinus Indervelden who managed to create the first newpolder in 1654 with Dutch money and expert workers fromBrabant. Other polders followed in 1657 and 1663. This Dutch settlement is still present today in form of anOld Catholic churchhouse.[clarification needed] The Old Catholic Dutchmen had been allowed to practise their religion inLutheran Denmark and to erect their own church. Until 1870 the preacher there used to hold the sermon in Dutch.
In the course of further land reclamation, both islands Pellworm and Nordstrand today have a total area of ca. 9,000 hectares which is one third of old Strand island. Between the islands, the Norderhever tidal channel was formed which has gained up to 30 m of depth during the last 370 years. It has frequently been a threat to the geological foundations of Pellworm.[11]
The people of the time could only imagine such a flood as a divine punishment from God. The evangelical enthusiast and poetAnna Ovena Hoyer interpreted the Burchardi Flood as the beginning of theapocalypse.[12]
Wüste liegen mehr denn die halben Wohnstädte, unnd sind die Häuser weggeschölet (weggespült); Wüste stehen die übrigen Häuser, unnd sind Fenstere, Thüren und Wende zerbrochen: Wüste stehen ganze Kirchspielen, unnd sind in etlichen wenig Haußwirthe mehr übrigen: Wüste stehen die Gotteshäuser, unnd sind weder Prediger noch Haußwirthe viel vorhanden, die diesselben Besuchen.
