Abound state is a composite of two or more fundamental building blocks, such as particles, atoms, or bodies, that behaves as a single object and in which energy is required to split them.[1]
Inquantum physics, a bound state is aquantum state of aparticle subject to apotential such that the particle has a tendency to remain localized in one or more regions of space.[2] The potential may be external or it may be the result of the presence of another particle; in the latter case, one can equivalently define a bound state as a state representing two or more particles whoseinteraction energy exceeds the total energy of each separate particle. One consequence is that, given a potentialvanishing at infinity, negative-energy states must be bound. Theenergy spectrum of the set of bound states are most commonly discrete, unlikescattering states offree particles, which have a continuous spectrum.
Although not bound states in the strict sense, metastable states with a net positive interaction energy, but long decay time, are often considered unstable bound states as well and are called "quasi-bound states".[3] Examples includeradionuclides andRydberg atoms.[4]
An overview of the various families of elementary and composite particles, and the theories describing their interactions
Aproton and anelectron can move separately; when they do, the total center-of-mass energy is positive, and such a pair of particles can be described as an ionized atom. Once the electron starts to "orbit" the proton, the energy becomes negative, and a bound state – namely thehydrogen atom – is formed. Only the lowest-energy bound state, theground state, is stable. Otherexcited states are unstable and will decay into stable (but not other unstable) bound states with less energy by emitting aphoton.
Theproton itself is a bound state of threequarks (twoup and onedown; onered, onegreen and oneblue). However, unlike the case of the hydrogen atom, the individual quarks can never be isolated. Seeconfinement.
A quantum particle is in abound state if at no point in time it is found "too far away" from any finite region. Using awave function representation, for example, this means[10]
such that
In general, a quantum state is a bound stateif and only if it is finitelynormalizable for all times and remains spatially localized.[11] Furthermore, a bound state lies within thepure point part of the spectrum ofif and only if it is aneigenvector of.[12]
More informally, "boundedness" results foremost from the choice ofdomain of definition and characteristics of the state rather than the observable.[nb 1] For a concrete example: let and let be theposition operator. Given compactly supported and.
If the state evolution of "moves this wave package to the right", e.g., if for all, then is not bound state with respect to position.
If does not change in time, i.e., for all, then is bound with respect to position.
More generally: If the state evolution of "just moves inside a bounded domain", then is bound with respect to position.
As finitely normalizable states must lie within thepure point part of the spectrum, bound states must lie within the pure point part. However, asNeumann andWigner pointed out, it is possible for the energy of a bound state to be located in the continuous part of the spectrum. This phenomenon is referred to asbound state in the continuum.[13][14]
Consider the one-particle Schrödinger equation. If a state has energy, then the wavefunctionψ satisfies, for some
so thatψ is exponentially suppressed at largex. This behaviour is well-studied for smoothly varying potentials in theWKB approximation for wavefunction, where an oscillatory behaviour is observed if the right hand side of the equation is negative and growing/decaying behaviour if it is positive.[15] Hence, negative energy-states are bound if vanishes at infinity.
One-dimensional bound states can be shown to be non-degenerate in energy for well-behaved wavefunctions that decay to zero at infinities. This need not hold true for wavefunctions in higher dimensions. Due to the property of non-degenerate states, one-dimensional bound states can always be expressed as real wavefunctions.
Proof
Consider two energy eigenstates states and with same energy eigenvalue.
Then since, the Schrodinger equation, which is expressed as:is satisfied for i = 1 and 2, subtracting the two equations gives:which can be rearranged to give the condition:Since, taking limit of x going to infinity on both sides, the wavefunctions vanish and gives.
Solving for, we get: which proves that the energy eigenfunction of a 1D bound state is unique.
Furthermore it can be shown that these wavefunctions can always be represented by a completely real wavefunction. Define real functions and such that. Then, from Schrodinger's equation: we get that, since the terms in the equation are all real values:applies for i = 1 and 2. Thus every 1D bound state can be represented by completely real eigenfunctions. Note that real function representation of wavefunctions from this proof applies for all non-degenerate states in general.
Node theorem states that bound wavefunction ordered according to increasing energy has exactly nodes, i.e., points where. Due to the form of Schrödinger's time independent equations, it is not possible for a physical wavefunction to have since it corresponds to solution.[16]
where,g is the gauge coupling constant, andƛi =ℏ/mic is thereduced Compton wavelength. Ascalar boson produces a universally attractive potential, whereas a vector attracts particles to antiparticles but repels like pairs. For two particles of massm1 andm2, theBohr radius of the system becomes
and yields the dimensionless number
.
In order for the first bound state to exist at all,. Because thephoton is massless,D is infinite forelectromagnetism. For theweak interaction, theZ boson's mass is91.1876±0.0021 GeV/c2, which prevents the formation of bound states between most particles, as it is97.2 times theproton's mass and178,000 times theelectron's mass.
^Blanchard, Philippe; Brüning, Erwin (2015).Mathematical Methods in Physics. Birkhäuser. p. 430.ISBN978-3-319-14044-5.
^Sakurai, Jun (1995). "7.8". In Tuan, San (ed.).Modern Quantum Mechanics (Revised ed.). Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley. pp. 418–9.ISBN0-201-53929-2.Suppose the barrier were infinitely high ... we expect bound states, with energyE > 0. ... They arestationary states with infinite lifetime. In the more realistic case of a finite barrier, the particle can be trapped inside, but it cannot be trapped forever. Such a trapped state has a finite lifetime due to quantum-mechanical tunneling. ... Let us call such a statequasi-bound state because it would be an honest bound state if the barrier were infinitely high.
^Stillinger, Frank H.; Herrick, David R. (1975). "Bound states in the continuum".Physical Review A.11 (2). American Physical Society (APS):446–454.doi:10.1103/physreva.11.446.ISSN0556-2791.
^Hall, Brian C. (2013).Quantum theory for mathematicians. Graduate texts in mathematics. New York Heidelberg$fDordrecht London: Springer. p. 316-320.ISBN978-1-4614-7115-8.
Blanchard, Philippe; Brüning, Edward (2015). "Some Applications of the Spectral Representation".Mathematical Methods in Physics: Distributions, Hilbert Space Operators, Variational Methods, and Applications in Quantum Physics (2nd ed.). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. p. 431.ISBN978-3-319-14044-5.