Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Bound state

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Quantum physics terminology

Abound state is a composite of two or more fundamental building blocks, such as particles, atoms, or bodies, that behaves as a single object and in which energy is required to split them.[1]

Inquantum physics, a bound state is aquantum state of aparticle subject to apotential such that the particle has a tendency to remain localized in one or more regions of space.[2] The potential may be external or it may be the result of the presence of another particle; in the latter case, one can equivalently define a bound state as a state representing two or more particles whoseinteraction energy exceeds the total energy of each separate particle. One consequence is that, given a potentialvanishing at infinity, negative-energy states must be bound. Theenergy spectrum of the set of bound states are most commonly discrete, unlikescattering states offree particles, which have a continuous spectrum.

Although not bound states in the strict sense, metastable states with a net positive interaction energy, but long decay time, are often considered unstable bound states as well and are called "quasi-bound states".[3] Examples includeradionuclides andRydberg atoms.[4]

Inrelativisticquantum field theory, a stable bound state ofn particles with masses{mk}k=1n{\displaystyle \{m_{k}\}_{k=1}^{n}} corresponds to apole in theS-matrix with acenter-of-mass energy less thankmk{\displaystyle \textstyle \sum _{k}m_{k}}. Anunstable bound state shows up as a pole with acomplex center-of-mass energy.

Examples

[edit]
An overview of the various families of elementary and composite particles, and the theories describing their interactions

Definition

[edit]
See also:Decomposition of spectrum (functional analysis) § Quantum mechanics

Letσ-finite measure space(X,A,μ){\displaystyle (X,{\mathcal {A}},\mu )} be aprobability space associated withseparablecomplexHilbert spaceH{\displaystyle H}. Define aone-parameter group of unitary operators(Ut)tR{\displaystyle (U_{t})_{t\in \mathbb {R} }}, adensity operatorρ=ρ(t0){\displaystyle \rho =\rho (t_{0})} and anobservableT{\displaystyle T} onH{\displaystyle H}. Letμ(T,ρ){\displaystyle \mu (T,\rho )} be the induced probability distribution ofT{\displaystyle T} with respect toρ{\displaystyle \rho }. Then the evolution

ρ(t0)[Ut(ρ)](t0)=ρ(t0+t){\displaystyle \rho (t_{0})\mapsto [U_{t}(\rho )](t_{0})=\rho (t_{0}+t)}

isbound with respect toT{\displaystyle T} if

limRsuptt0μ(T,ρ(t))(R>R)=0{\displaystyle \lim _{R\rightarrow \infty }{\sup _{t\geq t_{0}}{\mu (T,\rho (t))(\mathbb {R} _{>R})}}=0},

whereR>R={xRx>R}{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} _{>R}=\lbrace x\in \mathbb {R} \mid x>R\rbrace }.[dubiousdiscuss][9]

A quantum particle is in abound state if at no point in time it is found "too far away" from any finite regionRX{\displaystyle R\subset X}. Using awave function representation, for example, this means[10]

0=limRP(particle measured inside XR)=limRXR|ψ(x)|2dμ(x),{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}0&=\lim _{R\to \infty }{\mathbb {P} ({\text{particle measured inside }}X\setminus R)}\\&=\lim _{R\to \infty }{\int _{X\setminus R}|\psi (x)|^{2}\,d\mu (x)},\end{aligned}}}

such that

X|ψ(x)|2dμ(x)<.{\displaystyle \int _{X}{|\psi (x)|^{2}\,d\mu (x)}<\infty .}

In general, a quantum state is a bound stateif and only if it is finitelynormalizable for all timestR{\displaystyle t\in \mathbb {R} } and remains spatially localized.[11] Furthermore, a bound state lies within thepure point part of the spectrum ofT{\displaystyle T}if and only if it is aneigenvector ofT{\displaystyle T}.[12]

More informally, "boundedness" results foremost from the choice ofdomain of definition and characteristics of the state rather than the observable.[nb 1] For a concrete example: letH:=L2(R){\displaystyle H:=L^{2}(\mathbb {R} )} and letT{\displaystyle T} be theposition operator. Given compactly supportedρ=ρ(0)H{\displaystyle \rho =\rho (0)\in H} and[1,1]Supp(ρ){\displaystyle [-1,1]\subseteq \mathrm {Supp} (\rho )}.

Properties

[edit]
See also:Spectrum (physical sciences) § Continuous versus discrete spectra

As finitely normalizable states must lie within thepure point part of the spectrum, bound states must lie within the pure point part. However, asNeumann andWigner pointed out, it is possible for the energy of a bound state to be located in the continuous part of the spectrum. This phenomenon is referred to asbound state in the continuum.[13][14]

Position-bound states

[edit]

Consider the one-particle Schrödinger equation. If a state has energyE<max(limxV(x),limxV(x)){\textstyle E<\max {\left(\lim _{x\to \infty }{V(x)},\lim _{x\to -\infty }{V(x)}\right)}}, then the wavefunctionψ satisfies, for someX>0{\displaystyle X>0}

ψψ=2m2(V(x)E)>0 for x>X{\displaystyle {\frac {\psi ^{\prime \prime }}{\psi }}={\frac {2m}{\hbar ^{2}}}(V(x)-E)>0{\text{ for }}x>X}

so thatψ is exponentially suppressed at largex. This behaviour is well-studied for smoothly varying potentials in theWKB approximation for wavefunction, where an oscillatory behaviour is observed if the right hand side of the equation is negative and growing/decaying behaviour if it is positive.[15] Hence, negative energy-states are bound ifV(x){\displaystyle V(x)} vanishes at infinity.

Non-degeneracy in one-dimensional bound states

[edit]

One-dimensional bound states can be shown to be non-degenerate in energy for well-behaved wavefunctions that decay to zero at infinities. This need not hold true for wavefunctions in higher dimensions. Due to the property of non-degenerate states, one-dimensional bound states can always be expressed as real wavefunctions.

Proof

Consider two energy eigenstates statesΨ1{\textstyle \Psi _{1}} andΨ2{\textstyle \Psi _{2}} with same energy eigenvalue.

Then since, the Schrodinger equation, which is expressed as:E=1Ψi(x,t)22m2Ψi(x,t)x2+V(x,t){\displaystyle E=-{\frac {1}{\Psi _{i}(x,t)}}{\frac {\hbar ^{2}}{2m}}{\frac {\partial ^{2}\Psi _{i}(x,t)}{\partial x^{2}}}+V(x,t)}is satisfied for i = 1 and 2, subtracting the two equations gives:1Ψ1(x,t)2Ψ1(x,t)x21Ψ2(x,t)2Ψ2(x,t)x2=0{\displaystyle {\frac {1}{\Psi _{1}(x,t)}}{\frac {\partial ^{2}\Psi _{1}(x,t)}{\partial x^{2}}}-{\frac {1}{\Psi _{2}(x,t)}}{\frac {\partial ^{2}\Psi _{2}(x,t)}{\partial x^{2}}}=0}which can be rearranged to give the condition:x(Ψ1xΨ2)x(Ψ2xΨ1)=0{\displaystyle {\frac {\partial }{\partial x}}\left({\frac {\partial \Psi _{1}}{\partial x}}\Psi _{2}\right)-{\frac {\partial }{\partial x}}\left({\frac {\partial \Psi _{2}}{\partial x}}\Psi _{1}\right)=0}SinceΨ1x(x)Ψ2(x)Ψ2x(x)Ψ1(x)=C{\textstyle {\frac {\partial \Psi _{1}}{\partial x}}(x)\Psi _{2}(x)-{\frac {\partial \Psi _{2}}{\partial x}}(x)\Psi _{1}(x)=C}, taking limit of x going to infinity on both sides, the wavefunctions vanish and givesC=0{\textstyle C=0}.


Solving forΨ1x(x)Ψ2(x)=Ψ2x(x)Ψ1(x){\textstyle {\frac {\partial \Psi _{1}}{\partial x}}(x)\Psi _{2}(x)={\frac {\partial \Psi _{2}}{\partial x}}(x)\Psi _{1}(x)}, we get:Ψ1(x)=kΨ2(x){\textstyle \Psi _{1}(x)=k\Psi _{2}(x)} which proves that the energy eigenfunction of a 1D bound state is unique.


Furthermore it can be shown that these wavefunctions can always be represented by a completely real wavefunction. Define real functionsρ1(x){\textstyle \rho _{1}(x)} andρ2(x){\textstyle \rho _{2}(x)} such thatΨ(x)=ρ1(x)+iρ2(x){\textstyle \Psi (x)=\rho _{1}(x)+i\rho _{2}(x)}. Then, from Schrodinger's equation:Ψ=2m(EV(x))2Ψ{\displaystyle \Psi ''=-{\frac {2m(E-V(x))}{\hbar ^{2}}}\Psi } we get that, since the terms in the equation are all real values:ρi=2m(EV(x))2ρi{\displaystyle \rho _{i}''=-{\frac {2m(E-V(x))}{\hbar ^{2}}}\rho _{i}}applies for i = 1 and 2. Thus every 1D bound state can be represented by completely real eigenfunctions. Note that real function representation of wavefunctions from this proof applies for all non-degenerate states in general.

Node theorem

[edit]

Node theorem states thatnth{\displaystyle n{\text{th}}} bound wavefunction ordered according to increasing energy has exactlyn1{\displaystyle n-1} nodes, i.e., pointsx=a{\displaystyle x=a} whereψ(a)=0ψ(a){\displaystyle \psi (a)=0\neq \psi '(a)}. Due to the form of Schrödinger's time independent equations, it is not possible for a physical wavefunction to haveψ(a)=0=ψ(a){\displaystyle \psi (a)=0=\psi '(a)} since it corresponds toψ(x)=0{\displaystyle \psi (x)=0} solution.[16]

Requirements

[edit]

Aboson with massmχmediating aweakly coupled interaction produces anYukawa-like interaction potential,

V(r)=±αχrerλ χ{\displaystyle V(r)=\pm {\frac {\alpha _{\chi }}{r}}e^{-{\frac {r}{\lambda \!\!\!{\frac {}{\ }}_{\chi }}}}},

whereαχ=g2/4π{\displaystyle \alpha _{\chi }=g^{2}/4\pi },g is the gauge coupling constant, andƛi =/mic is thereduced Compton wavelength. Ascalar boson produces a universally attractive potential, whereas a vector attracts particles to antiparticles but repels like pairs. For two particles of massm1 andm2, theBohr radius of the system becomes

a0=λ  _1+λ  _2αχ{\displaystyle a_{0}={\frac {{\lambda \!\!\!^{{}^{\underline {\ \ }}}}_{1}+{\lambda \!\!\!^{{}^{\underline {\ \ }}}}_{2}}{\alpha _{\chi }}}}

and yields the dimensionless number

D=λ  _χa0=αχλ  _χλ  _1+λ  _2=αχm1+m2mχ{\displaystyle D={\frac {{\lambda \!\!\!^{{}^{\underline {\ \ }}}}_{\chi }}{a_{0}}}=\alpha _{\chi }{\frac {{\lambda \!\!\!^{{}^{\underline {\ \ }}}}_{\chi }}{{\lambda \!\!\!^{{}^{\underline {\ \ }}}}_{1}+{\lambda \!\!\!^{{}^{\underline {\ \ }}}}_{2}}}=\alpha _{\chi }{\frac {m_{1}+m_{2}}{m_{\chi }}}}.

In order for the first bound state to exist at all,D0.8{\displaystyle D\gtrsim 0.8}. Because thephoton is massless,D is infinite forelectromagnetism. For theweak interaction, theZ boson's mass is91.1876±0.0021 GeV/c2, which prevents the formation of bound states between most particles, as it is97.2 times theproton's mass and178,000 times theelectron's mass.

Note, however, that, if theHiggs interaction did not break electroweak symmetry at theelectroweak scale, then the SU(2)weak interaction would becomeconfining.[17]

See also

[edit]

Remarks

[edit]
  1. ^SeeExpectation value (quantum mechanics) for an example.

References

[edit]
  1. ^"Bound state - Oxford Reference".
  2. ^Blanchard, Philippe; Brüning, Erwin (2015).Mathematical Methods in Physics. Birkhäuser. p. 430.ISBN 978-3-319-14044-5.
  3. ^Sakurai, Jun (1995). "7.8". In Tuan, San (ed.).Modern Quantum Mechanics (Revised ed.). Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley. pp. 418–9.ISBN 0-201-53929-2.Suppose the barrier were infinitely high ... we expect bound states, with energyE > 0. ... They arestationary states with infinite lifetime. In the more realistic case of a finite barrier, the particle can be trapped inside, but it cannot be trapped forever. Such a trapped state has a finite lifetime due to quantum-mechanical tunneling. ... Let us call such a statequasi-bound state because it would be an honest bound state if the barrier were infinitely high.
  4. ^Gallagher, Thomas F. (1994-09-15). "Oscillator strengths and lifetimes".Rydberg Atoms (1 ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 38–49.doi:10.1017/cbo9780511524530.005.ISBN 978-0-521-38531-2.
  5. ^K. Winkler; G. Thalhammer; F. Lang; R. Grimm; J. H. Denschlag; A. J. Daley; A. Kantian; H. P. Buchler; P. Zoller (2006). "Repulsively bound atom pairs in an optical lattice".Nature.441 (7095):853–856.arXiv:cond-mat/0605196.Bibcode:2006Natur.441..853W.doi:10.1038/nature04918.PMID 16778884.S2CID 2214243.
  6. ^Javanainen, Juha; Odong Otim; Sanders, Jerome C. (Apr 2010). "Dimer of two bosons in a one-dimensional optical lattice".Phys. Rev. A.81 (4) 043609.arXiv:1004.5118.Bibcode:2010PhRvA..81d3609J.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.81.043609.S2CID 55445588.
  7. ^M. Valiente & D. Petrosyan (2008). "Two-particle states in the Hubbard model".J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.41 (16) 161002.arXiv:0805.1812.Bibcode:2008JPhB...41p1002V.doi:10.1088/0953-4075/41/16/161002.S2CID 115168045.
  8. ^Max T. C. Wong & C. K. Law (May 2011). "Two-polariton bound states in the Jaynes-Cummings-Hubbard model".Phys. Rev. A.83 (5) 055802.American Physical Society.arXiv:1101.1366.Bibcode:2011PhRvA..83e5802W.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.83.055802.S2CID 119200554.
  9. ^Reed, M.; Simon, B. (1980).Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics: I: Functional analysis. Academic Press. p. 303.ISBN 978-0-12-585050-6.
  10. ^Gustafson, Stephen J.; Sigal, Israel Michael (2020). "Bound and Decaying States".Mathematical Concepts of Quantum Mechanics. Cham: Springer International Publishing.doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59562-3.ISBN 978-3-030-59561-6.ISSN 0172-5939.
  11. ^Ruelle, D. (1969)."A remark on bound states in potential-scattering theory"(PDF).Il Nuovo Cimento A.61 (4). Springer Science and Business Media LLC.doi:10.1007/bf02819607.ISSN 0369-3546.
  12. ^Simon, B. (1978)."An Overview of Rigorous Scattering Theory". p. 3.
  13. ^Stillinger, Frank H.; Herrick, David R. (1975). "Bound states in the continuum".Physical Review A.11 (2). American Physical Society (APS):446–454.doi:10.1103/physreva.11.446.ISSN 0556-2791.
  14. ^Hsu, Chia Wei; Zhen, Bo; Stone, A. Douglas; Joannopoulos, John D.; Soljačić, Marin (2016)."Bound states in the continuum".Nature Reviews Materials.1 (9). Springer Science and Business Media LLC.doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2016.48.hdl:1721.1/108400.ISSN 2058-8437.
  15. ^Hall, Brian C. (2013).Quantum theory for mathematicians. Graduate texts in mathematics. New York Heidelberg$fDordrecht London: Springer. p. 316-320.ISBN 978-1-4614-7115-8.
  16. ^Berezin, F. A. (1991).The Schrödinger equation. Dordrecht ; Boston : Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 64–66.ISBN 978-0-7923-1218-5.
  17. ^Claudson, M.; Farhi, E.; Jaffe, R. L. (1 August 1986). "Strongly coupled standard model".Physical Review D.34 (3):873–887.Bibcode:1986PhRvD..34..873C.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.34.873.PMID 9957220.
Elementary
Fermions
Quarks
Leptons
Bosons
Gauge
Scalar
Ghost fields
Hypothetical
Superpartners
Gauginos
Others
Others
Composite
Hadrons
Baryons
Mesons
Exotic hadrons
Others
Hypothetical
Baryons
Mesons
Others
Quasiparticles
Lists
Related
Intramolecular
(strong)
Covalent
Metallic
Ionic
Intermolecular
(weak)
Van der Waals
forces
Hydrogen
Noncovalent
other
Bond cleavage
Electron counting rules
International
National
Other

Further reading

[edit]
  • Blanchard, Philippe; Brüning, Edward (2015). "Some Applications of the Spectral Representation".Mathematical Methods in Physics: Distributions, Hilbert Space Operators, Variational Methods, and Applications in Quantum Physics (2nd ed.). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. p. 431.ISBN 978-3-319-14044-5.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bound_state&oldid=1314254420"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp