Abiographical film orbiopic (/ˈbaɪoʊˌpɪk/)[1] is a film that dramatizes the life of an actual person or group of people. Such films show the life of a historical person and the central character's real name is used.[2] They differ fromdocudrama films andhistorical drama films in that they attempt to comprehensively tell a single person's life story or at least the most historically important years of their lives.[3]
Biopic scholars include George F. Custen of theCollege of Staten Island and Dennis P. Bingham ofIndiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis. Custen, inBio/Pics: How Hollywood Constructed Public History (1992), regards the genre as having died with theHollywood studio era, and in particular,Darryl F. Zanuck.[4] On the other hand, Bingham's 2010 studyWhose Lives Are They Anyway? The Biopic as Contemporary Film Genre[5] shows how it perpetuates as a codified genre using many of the same tropes used in the studio era that has followed a similar trajectory as that shown byRick Altman in his study,Film/Genre.[6] Bingham also addresses the male biopic and the female biopic as distinct genres from each other, the former generally dealing with great accomplishments, the latter generally dealing with female victimization. Ellen Cheshire'sBio-Pics: a life in pictures (2014) examines UK/US films from the 1990s and 2000s. Each chapter reviews key films linked by profession and concludes with further viewing list.[7] Christopher Robé has also written on the gender norms that underlie the biopic in his article, "Taking Hollywood Back" in the 2009 issue ofCinema Journal.[8]
Roger Ebert defendedThe Hurricane and distortions in biographical films in general, stating "those who seek the truth about a man from the film of his life might as well seek it from his loving grandmother. ...The Hurricane is not adocumentary but aparable."[9]
Casting can be controversial for biographical films. Casting is often a balance between similarity in looks and ability to portray the characteristics of the person.Anthony Hopkins felt that he should not have playedRichard Nixon inNixon because of a lack of resemblance between the two.[citation needed] The casting ofJohn Wayne asGenghis Khan inThe Conqueror was objected to because of the American Wayne being cast as the Mongol warlord. Egyptian critics criticized the casting ofLouis Gossett Jr., an African American actor, as Egyptian presidentAnwar Sadat in the 1983 TV miniseriesSadat.[10] Also, some objected to the casting ofJennifer Lopez inSelena because she is a New York City native ofPuerto Rican descent whileSelena wasMexican American.[11]
^Bingham, Dennis (2010).Whose Lives Are They Anyway? The Biopic as Contemporary Film Genre. Rutgers University Press.ISBN978-0-8135-4658-2.OCLC318970570.
^Cheshire, Ellen (2014).Bio-Pics: a life in pictures. Columbia University Press.ISBN978-0-231-17205-9.
^Robé, Christopher (Winter 2009). "Taking Hollywood Back: The Historical Costume Drama, the Biopic, and Popular Front U.S. Film Criticism".Cinema Journal.48 (2):70–87.doi:10.1353/cj.0.0082.JSTOR20484449.S2CID153354352.
^Ebert, Roger (7 January 2000)."The Hurricane".Chicago Sun-Times.