In the framework of many-bodyquantum mechanics, models solvable by the Bethe ansatz can be contrasted with freefermion models. The dynamics of a free model is one-body reducible: its many-body wave function forfermions (bosons) is the antisymmetrized (symmetrized) product of one-body wave functions. Models solvable by the Bethe ansatz are interacting systems: their two-body sector has a nontrivialscattering matrix that depends on the particle momenta.
By contrast, such models are two-body reducible: the many-body scattering matrix factorizes into a product of two-body scattering matrices. Many-body collisions occur as sequences of pairwise interactions, and the total wave function can be represented entirely in terms of two-body scattering states. The overall scattering matrix equals the ordered product of these pairwise matrices.
where is the number of particles, are their position, is the set of all permutations of the integers; is the parity of the permutation; is the (quasi-)momentum of the-th particle, is the scattering phase shift function and is thesign function. This form is universal (at least for non-nested systems), with the momentum and scattering functions being model-dependent.
Theground state is aFermi sphere.Periodic boundary conditions lead to the Bethe ansatz equations or simply Bethe equations. In logarithmic form the Bethe ansatz equations can be generated by theYang action. The square of the norm of Bethe wave function is equal to thedeterminant of theHessian of the Yang action.[6]
A substantial generalization is thequantum inverse scattering method, or algebraic Bethe ansatz, which gives an ansatz for the underlyingoperator algebra that "has allowed a wide class of nonlinear evolution equations to be solved".[7]
The exact solutions of the so-calleds-d model (by P. B. Wiegmann[8] in 1980 and independently by N. Andrei,[9] also in 1980) and the Anderson model (by P. B. Wiegmann[10] in 1981, and by N. Kawakami and A. Okiji[11] in 1981) are also both based on the Bethe ansatz. There exist multi-channel generalizations of these two models also amenable to exact solutions (by N. Andrei and C. Destri[12] and by C. J. Bolech and N. Andrei[13]). Recently several models solvable by Bethe ansatz were realized experimentally in solid states and optical lattices. An important role in the theoretical description of these experiments was played by Jean-Sébastien Caux andAlexei Tsvelik.[citation needed]
There are many similar methods which come under the name of Bethe ansatz
Algebraic Bethe ansatz.[14] Thequantum inverse scattering method is the method of solution by algebraic Bethe ansatz, and the two are practically synonymous.
The Heisenberg antiferromagnetic chain is defined by the Hamiltonian (assuming periodic boundary conditions)
This model is solvable using the (coordinate) Bethe ansatz. The scattering phase shift function is with in which the momentum has been conveniently reparametrized as in terms of therapidity The boundary conditions (periodic here) impose theBethe equations
or more conveniently in logarithmic form
where the quantum numbers are distinct half-odd integers for even, integers for odd (with defined).
1930:Felix Bloch proposes an oversimplified ansatz which miscounts the number of solutions to the Schrödinger equation for the Heisenberg chain.[18]
1931:Hans Bethe proposes the correct ansatz and carefully shows that it yields the correct number of eigenfunctions.[1]
1938:Lamek Hulthén [de] obtains the exact ground-state energy of the Heisenberg model.[19]
1958:Raymond Lee Orbach uses the Bethe ansatz to solve the Heisenberg model with anisotropic interactions.[20]
1962: J. des Cloizeaux and J. J. Pearson obtain the correct spectrum of the Heisenberg antiferromagnet (spinon dispersion relation),[21] showing that it differs from Anderson's spin-wave theory predictions[22] (the constant prefactor is different).
1963:Elliott H. Lieb andWerner Liniger [de] provide the exact solution of the 1d δ-function interacting Bose gas[23] (now known as theLieb-Liniger model). Lieb studies the spectrum and defines two basic types of excitations.[24]
1964:Robert B. Griffiths obtains the magnetization curve of the Heisenberg model at zero temperature.[25]
1966:C. N. Yang andC. P. Yang rigorously prove that the ground-state of the Heisenberg chain is given by the Bethe ansatz.[26] They study properties and applications in[27] and.[28]
1967:C. N. Yang generalizes Lieb and Liniger's solution of the δ-function interacting Bose gas to arbitrary permutation symmetry of the wavefunction, giving birth to the nested Bethe ansatz.[29]
^abBethe, H. (March 1931). "Zur Theorie der Metalle. I. Eigenwerte und Eigenfunktionen der linearen Atomkette".Zeitschrift für Physik.71 (3–4):205–226.doi:10.1007/BF01341708.S2CID124225487.
^Korepin, V. E.; Bogoliubov, N. M.; Izergin, A. G. (1993).Quantum Inverse Scattering Method and Correlation Functions. Cambridge University Press.ISBN978-0-521-37320-3.
^Chari, V.; Pressley, A. (1994).A Guide to Quantum Groups. Cambridge University Press.ISBN978-0-521-55884-6.
^Lieb, Elliott H.; Liniger, Werner (15 May 1963). "Exact Analysis of an Interacting Bose Gas. I. The General Solution and the Ground State".Physical Review.130 (4):1605–1616.Bibcode:1963PhRv..130.1605L.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.130.1605.
^Griffiths, Robert B. (3 February 1964). "Magnetization Curve at Zero Temperature for the Antiferromagnetic Heisenberg Linear Chain".Physical Review.133 (3A):A768–A775.Bibcode:1964PhRv..133..768G.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.133.A768.
^Yang, C. N.; Yang, C. P. (7 October 1966). "One-Dimensional Chain of Anisotropic Spin-Spin Interactions. I. Proof of Bethe's Hypothesis for Ground State in a Finite System".Physical Review.150 (1):321–327.Bibcode:1966PhRv..150..321Y.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.150.321.
^Yang, C. N.; Yang, C. P. (7 October 1966). "One-Dimensional Chain of Anisotropic Spin-Spin Interactions. II. Properties of the Ground-State Energy Per Lattice Site for an Infinite System".Physical Review.150 (1):327–339.Bibcode:1966PhRv..150..327Y.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.150.327.
^Yang, C. N.; Yang, C. P. (4 November 1966). "One-Dimensional Chain of Anisotropic Spin-Spin Interactions. III. Applications".Physical Review.151 (1):258–264.Bibcode:1966PhRv..151..258Y.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.151.258.
^Lieb, Elliott H.; Wu, F. Y. (17 June 1968). "Absence of Mott Transition in an Exact Solution of the Short-Range, One-Band Model in One Dimension".Physical Review Letters.20 (25):1445–1448.Bibcode:1968PhRvL..20.1445L.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.20.1445.
^Yang, C. N.; Yang, C. P. (July 1969). "Thermodynamics of a One-Dimensional System of Bosons with Repulsive Delta-Function Interaction".Journal of Mathematical Physics.10 (7):1115–1122.Bibcode:1969JMP....10.1115Y.doi:10.1063/1.1664947.