When German armoured forces broke through the US lines in Belgium during theBattle of the Bulge, Montgomery received command of the northern shoulder of the Bulge. Montgomery's 21st Army Group, including the USNinth Army and theFirst Allied Airborne Army, crossed the Rhine inOperation Plunder in March 1945. By the end of the war, troops under Montgomery's command had taken part in the encirclement of theRuhr Pocket, liberated the Netherlands, and captured much of north-west Germany. On 4 May 1945, Montgomery accepted the surrender of the German forces in north-western Europe atLüneburg Heath, south ofHamburg, after the surrender of Berlin to the USSR on 2 May.
After the death of Sir Robert Montgomery, Henry inherited the Montgomery ancestral estate of New Park inMoville, a small town inInishowen in the north of County Donegal in Ulster, the northernprovince in Ireland. There was still £13,000 to pay on amortgage, a large debt in the 1880s (equivalent to £1,825,976 in 2023)[15], and Henry was at the time still only anAnglican vicar. Despite selling off all the farms that were in thetownland of Ballynally, on the north-western shores ofLough Foyle,[16] "there was barely enough to keep up New Park and pay for the blasted summer holiday" (i.e., at New Park).[17]
It was a financial relief of some magnitude when, in 1889, Henry was madeBishop of Tasmania, then still aBritish colony, and Bernard spent his formative years there. Bishop Montgomery considered it his duty to spend as much time as possible in the rural areas of Tasmania and was away for up to six months at a time. While he was away, his wife, still in her mid-20s, gave her children "constant" beatings,[18] then ignored them most of the time. Of Bernard's siblings, Sibyl died prematurely in Tasmania, and Harold, Donald and Una all emigrated.[19] Maud Montgomery took little active interest in the education of her young children other than to have them taught by tutors brought from Britain, although Bernard briefly attended the then coeducationalSt Michael's Collegiate School.[20] The loveless environment made Bernard something of a bully, as he himself recalled: "I was a dreadful little boy. I don't suppose anybody would put up with my sort of behaviour these days."[21] Later in life Montgomery refused to allow his sonDavid to have anything to do with his grandmother, and refused to attend her funeral in 1949.[22]
TheGreat War began in August 1914 and Montgomery moved to France with his battalion that month, which was at the time part of the10th Infantry Brigade of the4th Division of theBritish Expeditionary Force (BEF).[24] He was promoted totemporarycaptain on 14 September.[27] He saw action at theBattle of Le Cateau that month and during theretreat from Mons.[24] AtMéteren, near the Belgian border atBailleul on 13 October 1914, during anAllied counter-offensive, he was shot through the right lung by a sniper.[24] Lying in the open, he remained still and pretended to be dead, in the hope that he would not receive any more enemy attention.[28] One of his men did attempt to rescue him but was shot dead by a hidden enemy sniper and collapsed over Montgomery. The sniper continued to fire and Montgomery was hit once more, in the knee,[22] but the dead soldier, in Montgomery's words, "received many bullets meant for me."[28] Assuming them to both be dead, the officers and men of Montgomery's battalion chose to leave them where they were until darkness arrived and stretcher bearers managed to recover the two bodies, with Montgomery by this time barely clinging on to life. The doctors at the advanced dressing station (ADS), too, had no hope for him and ordered a grave to be dug. Miraculously, however, Montgomery was still alive and, after being placed in an ambulance and then being sent to a hospital, was treated and eventually evacuated to England, where he would remain for well over a year.[29] He was appointed a Companion of theDistinguished Service Order (DSO), for his gallant leadership during this period: the citation for this award, published inThe London Gazette in December 1914 reads:
Conspicuous gallant leading on 13th October, when he turned the enemy out of their trenches with the bayonet. He was severely wounded.[30]
TheMinister of Munitions,Winston Churchill, watching the march past of the 47th (2nd London) Division in theGrande Place, Lille, France, October 1918. In front of him is the 47th Division's GSO1, Lieutenant Colonel Bernard Montgomery.
It was in this role that Montgomery served at theBattle of Passchendaele which began in late July 1917. He was promoted to the temporary rank ofmajor in February 1918,[34] and brevet major in June.[35] He finished the war in November 1918 as GSO1 (effectivelychief of staff) of the47th (2nd London) Division,[32] with the temporary rank oflieutenant colonel, to which appointment and rank he had been assigned to on 16 July.[36] A photograph from October 1918, reproduced in many biographies, shows the then unknown Lieutenant-Colonel Montgomery standing in front ofWinston Churchill (then theMinister of Munitions) at the parade following the liberation ofLille.[37]
Montgomery was profoundly influenced by his experiences during the war, in particular by the leadership, or rather the lack of it, being displayed by the senior commanders. He later wrote:
There was little contact between the generals and the soldiers. I went through the whole war on the Western Front, except during the period I was in England after being wounded; I never once saw the British Commander-in-Chief, neitherFrench norHaig, and only twice did I see an Army Commander.
The higher staffs were out of touch with the regimental officers and with the troops. The former lived in comfort, which became greater as the distance of their headquarters behind the lines increased. There was no harm in this provided there was touch and sympathy between the staff and the troops. This was often lacking. At most large headquarters in back areas the doctrine seemed to me to be that the troops existed for the benefit of the staff. My war experience led me to believe that the staff must be the servant of the troops, and that a good staff officer must serve his commander and the troops but himself be anonymous.
The frightful casualties appalled me. The so-called "good fighting generals" of the war appeared to me to be those who had a complete disregard for human life. There were of course exceptions and I suppose one such was Plumer; I had only once seen him and had never spoken to him.[38]
After graduating from the Staff College, he was appointed brigade major in the17th Infantry Brigade in January 1921.[42] The brigade was stationed inCounty Cork, Ireland, carrying out counter-guerilla operations during the final stages of theIrish War of Independence.[32]
Montgomery came to the conclusion that the conflict could not be won without harsh measures, and that self-government for Ireland was the only feasible solution; in 1923, after the establishment of theIrish Free State and during theIrish Civil War, Montgomery wrote to ColonelArthur Percival of theEssex Regiment:
Personally, my whole attention was given to defeating the rebels but it never bothered me a bit how many houses were burnt. I think I regarded all civilians as'Shinners' and I never had any dealings with any of them. My own view is that to win a war of this sort, you must be ruthless.Oliver Cromwell, or the Germans, would have settled it in a very short time. Nowadays public opinion precludes such methods, the nation would never allow it, and the politicians would lose their jobs if they sanctioned it. That being so, I consider thatLloyd George was right in what he did, if we had gone on we could probably have squashed the rebellion as a temporary measure, but it would have broken out again like an ulcer the moment we removed the troops. I think the rebels would probably have refused battles, and hidden their arms etc. until we had gone. The only way therefore was to give them some form of self government, and let them squash the rebellion themselves, they are the only people who could really stamp it out.[43]
In one noteworthy incident on 2 May 1922, Montgomery led a force of 60 soldiers and four armoured cars to the town ofMacroom to search for four British officers who were missing in the area. While he had hoped the show of force would assist in finding the men, he was under strict orders not to attack the IRA. On arriving in the town square in front ofMacroom Castle, he summoned the IRA commander, Charlie Browne, to parley. At the castle gates Montgomery spoke to Browne, explaining what would happen should the officers not be released. Once finished, Browne responded with his own ultimatum to Montgomery to "leave town within 10 minutes". Browne then turned heels and returned to the Castle. At this point another IRA officer, Pat O'Sullivan, whistled to Montgomery drawing his attention to scores of IRA volunteers who had quietly taken up firing positions all around the square—surrounding Montgomery's forces. Realising his precarious position, Montgomery led his troops out of the town, a decision which raised hostile questions in theHouse of Commons but was later approved by Montgomery's own superiors. Unknown to Montgomery at this time, the four missing officers had already been executed.[44]
In May 1923, Montgomery was posted to the49th (West Riding) Infantry Division, aTerritorial Army (TA) formation.[32] He returned to the 1st Battalion, Royal Warwickshire Regiment in 1925 as acompany commander[32] and was promoted to major in July 1925.[45] From January 1926 to January 1929 he served as Deputy Assistant Adjutant General at the Staff College, Camberley, in the temporary rank of lieutenant-colonel.[46]
In 1925, in his first known courtship of a woman, Montgomery, then in his late thirties, proposed to a 17-year-old girl, Betty Anderson. His approach included drawing diagrams in the sand of how he would deploy his tanks and infantry in a future war, a contingency which seemed very remote at that time. She respected his ambition and single-mindedness but declined his proposal.[47]
In 1927, he met and married Elizabeth (Betty) Carver,née Hobart.[32] She was the sister of the future Second World War commander SirPercy Hobart.[32] Betty Carver had two sons in their early teens, John and Dick, from her first marriage toOswald Carver. Dick Carver later wrote that it had been "a very brave thing" for Montgomery to take on a widow with two children.[48] Montgomery's son,David, was born in August 1928.[32]
While on holiday inBurnham-on-Sea inSomerset in 1937, Betty suffered an insect bite which became infected, and she died in her husband's arms fromsepticaemia followingamputation of her leg.[32] The loss devastated Montgomery, who was then serving as a brigadier, but he insisted on throwing himself back into his work immediately after the funeral.[22] Montgomery's marriage had been extremely happy. Much of his correspondence with his wife was destroyed when his quarters at Portsmouth were bombed during the Second World War.[49] After Montgomery's death, John Carver wrote that his mother had arguably done the country a favour by keeping his personal oddities—his extreme single-mindedness, and his intolerance of and suspicion of the motives of others—within reasonable bounds long enough for him to have a chance of attaining high command.[50]
Both of Montgomery's stepsons became army officers in the 1930s (both were serving in India at the time of their mother's death), and both served in the Second World War, each eventually attaining the rank of colonel.[51] While serving as a GSO2[52] with Eighth Army, Dick Carver was sent forward during the pursuit after El Alamein to help identify a new site for Eighth Army HQ. He was taken prisoner atMersa Matruh on 7 November 1942.[53] Montgomery wrote to his contacts in England asking that inquiries be made via theRed Cross as to where his stepson was being held, and that parcels be sent to him.[54] Like many British POWs, the most famous being GeneralRichard O'Connor, Dick Carver escaped in September 1943 during the brief hiatus betweenItaly's departure from the war and the German seizure of the country. He eventually reached British lines on 5 December 1943, to the delight of his stepfather, who sent him home to Britain to recuperate.[55]
In January 1929, Montgomery was promoted to brevet lieutenant-colonel.[56] That month he returned to the 1st Battalion, Royal Warwickshire Regiment again, as Commander of Headquarters Company; he went to theWar Office to help write the Infantry Training Manual in mid-1929.[32] In 1931 Montgomery was promoted to substantive lieutenant-colonel[57] and became theCommanding officer (CO) of the 1st Battalion, Royal Warwickshire Regiment and saw service inPalestine andBritish India.[32] He was promoted tocolonel in June 1934 (seniority from January 1932).[58] He attended and was then recommended to become an instructor at theIndian Army Staff College (now thePakistan Command and Staff College) inQuetta, British India.[59]
On completion of his tour of duty in India, Montgomery returned to Britain in June 1937[60] where he took command of the9th Infantry Brigade with the temporary rank ofbrigadier.[61] His wife died that year.[32]
In 1938, he organised anamphibiouscombined operations landing exercise that impressed the new C-in-C ofSouthern Command, General SirArchibald Wavell. He was promoted tomajor-general on 14 October 1938[62] and took command of the8th Infantry Division[63] in the British mandate of Palestine.[32] In Palestine, Montgomery was involved in suppressing anArab revolt which had broken out over opposition toJewish emigration.[64] He returned in July 1939 to Britain, suffering a serious illness on the way, to command the3rd Infantry Division.[32] Reporting the suppression of the revolt in April 1939, Montgomery wrote, "I shall be sorry to leave Palestine in many ways, as I have enjoyed the war out here".[22]
Britain declared war on Germany on 3 September 1939 and the 3rd Division, together with its newGeneral Officer Commanding (GOC), was deployed to France as part of theBritish Expeditionary Force (BEF), commanded by GeneralLord Gort. Shortly after the division's arrival overseas, Montgomery faced serious trouble from his military superiors and the clergy for his frank attitude regarding the sexual health of his soldiers, but was defended from dismissal by his superiorAlan Brooke, commander ofII Corps, of which Montgomery's division formed a part.[65] Montgomery had issued a circular on the prevention of venereal disease, worded in such "obscene language" that both theChurch of England andRoman Catholic seniorchaplains objected; Brooke told Monty that he did not want any further errors of this kind, though deciding not to get him to formally withdraw it as it would remove any "vestige of respect" left for him.[66]
Lieutenant-General Alan Brooke, GOC II Corps, with Major-General Bernard Montgomery, GOC 3rd Division, and Major-GeneralDudley Johnson, GOC4th Infantry Division, pictured here in either 1939 or 1940
Although Montgomery's new command was a Regular Army formation, comprising the7th (Guards), and the8th and 9th Infantry Brigades along with supporting units, he was not impressed with its readiness for battle.[67] As a result, while most of the rest of the BEF set about preparing defences for an expected German attack sometime in the future, Montgomery began training his 3rd Division inoffensive tactics, organising severalexercises, each of which lasted for several days at a time. Mostly they revolved around the division advancing towards an objective, often a river line, only to come under attack and forced to withdraw to another position, usually behind another river.[67] These exercises usually occurred at night with only very minimal lighting being allowed. By the spring of 1940 Montgomery's division had gained a reputation of being a very agile and flexible formation.[67] By then theAllies had agreed toPlan D, where they would advance deep into Belgium and take up positions on theRiver Dyle by the time the German forces attacked. Brooke, Montgomery's corps commander, was pessimistic about the plan but Montgomery, in contrast, was not concerned, believing that he and his division would perform well regardless of the circumstances, particularly in awar of movement.[68]
Montgomery's training paid off when the Germans began their invasion of the Low Countries on 10 May 1940 and the 3rd Division advanced to its planned position, near the Belgian city ofLouvain. Soon after arrival, the division was fired on by members of the Belgian10th Infantry Division who mistook them forGerman paratroopers; Montgomery resolved the incident by approaching them and offering to place himself under Belgian command,[69] although Montgomery himself took control when the Germans arrived.[68] During this time he began to develop a particular habit, which he would keep throughout the war, of going to bed at 21:30 every night without fail and giving only a single order—that he was not to be disturbed—which was only very rarely disobeyed.[70]
The 3rd Division saw comparatively little action but, owing to the strict training methods of Montgomery, the division always managed to be in the right place at the right time, especially so during theretreat into France.[70] By 27 May, when theBelgian Army on the left flank of the BEF began to disintegrate, the 3rd Division achieved something very difficult, the movement at night from the right to the left of another division and only 2,000 yards behind it. This was performed with great professionalism and occurred without any incidents and thereby filled a very vulnerable gap in the BEF's defensive line.[71][70] On 29/30 May, Montgomery temporarily took over from Brooke, who received orders to return to the United Kingdom, as GOC of II Corps for the final stages of theDunkirk evacuation.[70]
The 3rd Division, temporarily commanded byKenneth Anderson in Montgomery's absence, returned to Britain intact with minimal casualties. Operation Dynamo—codename for the Dunkirk evacuation—saw 330,000 Allied military personnel, including most of the BEF, to Britain, although the BEF was forced to leave behind a significant amount of equipment.[72][70]
Montgomery, GOC V Corps, with war correspondents during a large-scale exercise in Southern Command, March 1941
On his return Montgomery antagonised theWar Office with trenchant criticisms of the command of the BEF[22] and was briefly relegated to divisional command of 3rd Division, which was the only fully equipped division in Britain.[73] He was made aCompanion of the Order of the Bath.[74]
Montgomery was ordered to make ready the 3rd Division to invade the neutral PortugueseAzores.[73] Models of the islands were prepared and detailed plans worked out for the invasion.[73] The invasion plans did not go ahead and plans switched to invading theCape Verde islands also belonging to neutralPortugal.[75] These invasion plans also did not go ahead. Montgomery was then ordered to prepare plans for the invasion of neutral Ireland and to seizeCork,Cobh and Cork harbour.[75] These invasion plans, like those of the Portuguese islands, also did not go ahead and in July 1940, Montgomery was appointed actinglieutenant-general and after handing over command of his division toJames Gammell, he was placed in command ofV Corps, responsible for the defence ofHampshire andDorset and started a long-running feud with the new Commander-in-chief (C-in-C) of Southern Command, Lieutenant-GeneralClaude Auchinleck.[76][22]
During Exercise 'Bumper' on 2 October 1941 Montgomery, the Chief Umpire, talks to General Sir Alan Brooke (C-in-C Home Forces).
In April 1941, he became commander ofXII Corps responsible for the defence ofKent.[72] During this period he instituted a regime of continuous training and insisted on high levels of physical fitness for both officers and other ranks. He was ruthless in sacking officers he considered unfit for command in action.[77] He was promoted to temporary lieutenant-general in July, overseeing the defence of Kent,Sussex andSurrey.[77][78] In December Montgomery was given command ofSouth-Eastern Command.[79] He renamed his command the South-Eastern Army to promote offensive spirit. During this time he further developed and rehearsed his ideas and trained his soldiers, culminating inExercise Tiger in May 1942, a combined forces exercise involving 100,000 troops.[80]
A story, probably apocryphal but popular at the time, is that the appointment caused Montgomery to remark that "After having an easy war, things have now got much more difficult." A colleague is supposed to have told him to cheer up—at which point Montgomery said "I'm not talking about me, I'm talking aboutRommel!"[82]
He ordered the creation of theX Corps, which contained all armoured divisions, to fight alongside hisXXX Corps, which was all infantry divisions. This arrangement differed from the German Panzer Corps: one of Rommel's Panzer Corps combined infantry, armour and artillery units under one corps commander. The only common commander for Montgomery's all-infantry and all-armour corps was the Eighth Army Commander himself. Writing post-war the English historianCorrelli Barnett commented that Montgomery's solution "was in every way opposite to Auchinleck's and in every way wrong, for it carried the existing dangerous separatism still further."[83]
Montgomery reinforced the 30 miles (48 km) long front line at El Alamein, something that would take two months to accomplish. He asked Alexander to send him two new British divisions (51st Highland and44th Home Counties) that were then arriving in Egypt and were scheduled to be deployed in defence of the Nile Delta. He moved his field HQ to Burg al Arab, close to the Air Force command post in order to better coordinate combined operations.[84]
Montgomery was determined that the army, navy and air forces should fight their battles in a unified, focused manner according to a detailed plan. He ordered immediate reinforcement of the vital heights of Alam Halfa, just behind his own lines, expecting the German commander, Erwin Rommel, to attack with the heights as his objective, something that Rommel soon did. Montgomery ordered all contingency plans for retreat to be destroyed. "I have cancelled the plan for withdrawal. If we are attacked, then there will be no retreat. If we cannot stay here alive, then we will stay here dead",[85] he told his officers at the first meeting he held with them in the desert, though, in fact, Auchinleck had no plans to withdraw from the strong defensive position he had chosen and established at El Alamein.[86]
Lieutenant-General Bernard Montgomery, the new commander of the British Eighth Army, and Lieutenant-GeneralBrian Horrocks, the new GOC XIII Corps, discussing troop dispositions at 22nd Armoured Brigade HQ, 20 August 1942. The brigade commander, BrigadierGeorge Roberts is on the right (in beret).
Montgomery made a great effort to appear before troops as often as possible, frequently visiting various units and making himself known to the men, often arranging for cigarettes to be distributed. Although he still wore a standard British officer's cap on arrival in the desert, he briefly wore an Australianbroad-brimmed hat before switching to wearing the black beret (with the badge of theRoyal Tank Regiment and the British General Officer'scap badge) for which he became notable. The black beret was offered to him by Jim Fraser while the latter was driving him on an inspection tour.[87] Both Brooke and Alexander were astonished by the transformation in atmosphere when they visited on 19 August, less than a week after Montgomery had taken command.[85]
Alan Brooke said that Churchill was always impatient for his generals to attack at once, and he wrote that Montgomery was always "my Monty" when Montgomery was out of favour with Churchill.Anthony Eden had some late night drinks with Churchill, and Eden said at a meeting of the Chiefs of Staff the next day (29 October 1942) that the Middle East offensive was "petering out". Alanbrooke had told Churchill "fairly plainly" what he thought of Eden's ability to judge the tactical situation from a distance, and was supported at the Chiefs of Staff meeting byJan Smuts.[88]
General Montgomery with his pets, the puppies "Hitler" (left) and "Rommel", and a cage of canaries which also travelled with him (at Blay, his second HQ in France in July 1944)
Rommel attempted to turn the left flank of the Eighth Army at theBattle of Alam el Halfa from 31 August 1942. The German/Italian armoured corps infantry attack was stopped in very heavy fighting. Rommel's forces had to withdraw urgently lest their retreat through the British minefields be cut off.[89] Montgomery was criticised for not counter-attacking the retreating forces immediately, but he felt strongly that his methodical build-up of British forces was not yet ready. A hasty counter-attack risked ruining his strategy for an offensive on his own terms in late October, planning for which had begun soon after he took command.[90] He was confirmed in the permanent rank of lieutenant-general in mid-October.[91]
The conquest ofLibya was essential for airfields to supportMalta and to threaten the rear of Axis forces opposing Operation Torch. Montgomery prepared meticulously for the new offensive after convincing Churchill that the time was not being wasted. (Churchill sent a telegram to Alexander on 23 September 1942 which began, "We are in your hands and of course a victorious battle makes amends for much delay."[92]) He was determined not to fight until he thought there had been sufficient preparation for a decisive victory, and put into action his beliefs with the gathering of resources, detailed planning, the training of troops—especially in clearing minefields and fighting at night[93]—and in the use of 252[94] of the latest American-builtSherman tanks, 90M7 Priest self-propelled howitzers, and making a personal visit to every unit involved in the offensive. By the time the offensive was ready in late October, Eighth Army had 231,000 men on its ration strength.[95]
TheSecond Battle of El Alamein began on 23 October 1942, and ended 12 days later with one of the first large-scale, decisive Allied land victories of the war. Montgomery correctly predicted both the length of the battle and the number of casualties (13,500).[96]
Historian Correlli Barnett has pointed out that the rain also fell on the Germans, and that the weather is therefore an inadequate explanation for the failure to exploit the breakthrough,[97] but nevertheless the Battle of El Alamein had been a great success. Over 30,000prisoners of war were taken,[98] including the German second-in-command, GeneralRitter von Thoma, as well as eight other general officers.[99]
The British Prime MinisterWinston Churchill with military leaders during his visit to Tripoli. The group includes: Lieutenant-General SirOliver Leese, General SirHarold Alexander, General SirAlan Brooke and General Sir Bernard Montgomery.
Montgomery was advanced toKCB and promoted to fullgeneral.[100] He kept the initiative, applying superior strength when it suited him, forcing Rommel out of each successive defensive position. On 6 March 1943, Rommel's attack on the over-extended Eighth Army atMedenine (Operation Capri) with the largest concentration of German armour in North Africa was successfully repulsed.[101] At theMareth Line, 20 to 27 March, when Montgomery encountered fiercer frontal opposition than he had anticipated, he switched his major effort into an outflanking inland pincer, backed by low-flyingRAF fighter-bomber support.[102] For his role in North Africa he was awarded theLegion of Merit by the United States government in the rank of Chief Commander.[103]
Montgomery visits Patton in Palermo, Sicily, July 1943.
The next major Allied attack was theAllied invasion of Sicily (Operation Husky). Montgomery considered the initial plans for the Allied invasion, which had been agreed in principle byGeneralDwight D. Eisenhower, theSupreme Allied CommanderAllied Forces Headquarters, and General Alexander, the15th Army Group commander, to be unworkable because of the dispersion of effort. He managed to have the plans recast to concentrate the Allied forces, havingLieutenant GeneralGeorge Patton'sUS Seventh Army land in the Gulf of Gela (on the Eighth Army's left flank, which landed aroundSyracuse in the south-east of Sicily) rather than nearPalermo in the west and north of Sicily.[104] Inter-Allied tensions grew as the American commanders, Patton andOmar Bradley (then commandingUS II Corps under Patton), took umbrage at what they saw as Montgomery's attitudes and boastfulness.[102] However, while they were considered three of the greatest soldiers of their time, due to their competitiveness they were renowned for "squabbling like three schoolgirls" thanks to their "bitchiness", "whining to their superiors" and "showing off".[105]
Montgomery's Eighth Army was then fully involved in theAllied invasion of Italy in early September 1943, becoming the first of the Allied forces to land inWestern Europe.[106] Led by Lieutenant General SirMiles Dempsey's XIII Corps, the Eighth Army landed on the toe of Italy inOperation Baytown on 3 September, four years to the day afterBritain declared war on Germany. They encountered little enemy resistance.[107] The Germans had made the decision to fall back and did what they could to stall the Eighth Army's advance, including blowing up bridges, laying mines, and setting up booby-traps. All of these slowed the Army's advance north on the awfulItalian roads, although it was Montgomery who was later much criticised for the lack of progress.[106] On 9 September theBritish 1st Airborne Division landed at the key port ofTaranto in the heel of Italy as part ofOperation Slapstick, capturing the port unopposed.[107] On the same day theU.S. Fifth Army under Lieutenant GeneralMark W. Clark (which actually contained a large number of British troops) landed atSalerno, nearNaples, as part ofOperation Avalanche but soon found itself fighting for its very existence with the Germans launching several determined counterattacks to try and push the Allies back into the sea, with Montgomery's men being too far away to provide any real assistance.[106] The situation was tense over the next few days but the two armies (both of which formed the 15th Army Group under General Alexander) finally began to meet on 16 September, by which time the crisis at Salerno was virtually over.[106]
The time has come to deal the enemy a terrific blow ...
Clark's Fifth Army then began to advance to the west of theApennine Mountains while Montgomery, with Lieutenant GeneralCharles Allfrey's V Corps having arrived to reinforce Dempsey's XIII Corps, advanced to the east. TheFoggia airfields soon fell to Allfrey's V Corps, but the Germans fought hard in the defence ofTermoli andBiferno.[106] Movement soon came to an almost complete halt in the early part of November when the Eighth Army came up against a new defensive line established by the Germans on the RiverSangro, which was to be the scene of much bitter and heavy fighting for the next month. While some ground was gained, it was often at the expense of heavy casualties and the Germans always managed to retreat to new defensive positions.[106]
Montgomery abhorred what he considered to be a lack of coordination, a dispersion of effort, a strategic muddle and a lack of opportunism in theAllied campaign in Italy, describing the whole affair as a "dog's breakfast".[102]
As a result of his dissatisfaction with Italy, he was delighted to receive the news that he was to return to Britain in January 1944.[108] He was assigned to command the21st Army Group consisting of all Allied ground forces participating inOperation Overlord, codename for the Allied invasion ofNormandy. Overall direction was assigned to the Supreme Allied Commander of the Allied Expeditionary Forces, American General Dwight D. Eisenhower.[107] Both Churchill and Eisenhower had found Montgomery difficult to work with in the past and wanted the position to go to the more affable General Sir Harold Alexander.[109] However Montgomery's patron, General Sir Alan Brooke, firmly argued that Montgomery was a much superior general to Alexander and ensured his appointment.[109] Without Brooke's support, Montgomery would have remained in Italy.[109] At his headquartersSt Paul's School on 7 April and 15 May Montgomery presented his strategy for the invasion. He envisaged a ninety-day battle, with all forces reaching theSeine. The campaign would pivot on an Allied-heldCaen in the east of the Normandy bridgehead, with relatively static British and Canadian armies forming a shoulder to attract and defeat German counter-attacks, relieving the US armies who would move and seize theCotentin Peninsula andBrittany, wheeling south and then east on the right forming a pincer.[102]
During the ten weeks of theBattle of Normandy, unfavourable autumnal weather conditions disrupted the Normandy landing areas.[102] Montgomery's initial plan was for the Anglo-Canadian troops under his command to break out immediately from their beachheads on the Calvados coast towards Caen with the aim of taking the city on either D Day or two days later.[110] Montgomery attempted to take Caen with the 3rd Infantry Division, the50th (Northumbrian) Infantry Division and the3rd Canadian Division, but was stopped from 6–8 June by the21st Panzer Division and12th SS Panzer DivisionHitlerjugend, who hit the advancing Anglo-Canadian troops very hard.[111] The 12th Waffen SS DivisionHitlerjugend, as its name implies, was drawn entirely from the more fanatical elements of theHitler Youth, and commanded by the ruthlessSS-BrigadeführerKurt Meyer, aka "Panzer Meyer".[112] Rommel followed up this success by ordering the2nd Panzer Division to Caen while Field MarshalGerd von Rundstedt received permission from Hitler to have the elite1st SS Panzer DivisionLeibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler and2nd SS Panzer DivisionDas Reich sent to Caen as well.[111] Montgomery thus had to face what Stephen Badsey called the "most formidable" of all the German divisions in France.[111]
General Montgomery passes German POWs while being driven along a road in a jeep, shortly after arriving in Normandy, 8 June 1944. Two seem to have recognised him.
The failure to take Caen immediately has been the source of an immense historiographical dispute with bitter nationalist overtones.[113] Broadly, there has been a "British school" which accepts Montgomery's post-war claim that he never intended to take Caen at once, and instead the Anglo-Canadian operations around Caen were a "holding operation" intended to attract the bulk of the German forces towards the Caen sector to allow the Americans to stage the "break out operation" on the left flank of the German positions, which was all part of Montgomery's "Master Plan" that he had conceived long before the Normandy campaign.[113] By contrast, the "American school" argued that Montgomery's initial "master plan" was for the 21st Army Group to take Caen at once and move his tank divisions into the plains south of Caen, to then stage a breakout that would lead the 21st Army Group into the plains of northern France and hence intoAntwerp and finally theRuhr.[114] Letters written by Eisenhower at the time of the battle make it clear that Eisenhower was expecting from Montgomery "the early capture of the important focal point of Caen". Later, when this plan had clearly failed, Eisenhower wrote that Montgomery had "evolved" the plan to have the US forces achieve the break-out instead.[115]
As the campaign progressed, Montgomery altered his initial plan for the invasion and continued the strategy of attracting and holding German counter-attacks in the area north of Caen rather than to the south, to allow the U.S. First Army in the west to takeCherbourg. A memo summarising Montgomery's operations written by Eisenhower's chief of staff, GeneralWalter Bedell Smith, who met with Montgomery in late June 1944 says nothing about Montgomery conducting a "holding operation" in the Caen sector, and instead speaks of him seeking a "breakout" into the plains south of the Seine.[116] On 12 June, Montgomery ordered the7th Armoured Division into an attack against thePanzer Lehr Division that made good progress at first, but ended when the Panzer Lehr was joined by the 2nd Panzer Division.[117] At theBattle of Villers-Bocage on 13 June, the British lost twentyCromwell tanks to fiveTiger tanks led by SSObersturmführerMichael Wittmann, in about five minutes.[117] Despite the setback at Villers Bocage, Montgomery was still optimistic as the Allies were landing more troops and supplies than they were losing in battle, and though the German lines were holding, theWehrmacht andWaffen SS were suffering considerable attrition.[118]Air Chief Marshal SirArthur Tedder complained that it was impossible to move fighter squadrons to France until Montgomery had captured some airfields, something he asserted that Montgomery appeared incapable of doing.[119] The firstV-1 flying bomb attacks on London, which started on 13 June, further increased the pressure on Montgomery from Whitehall to speed up his advance.[119]
On 18 June, Montgomery ordered Bradley to take Cherbourg while the British were to take Caen by 23 June.[119] InOperation Epsom, the British VII Corps commanded by Sir Richard O'Connor attempted to outflank Caen from the west by breaking through the dividing line between the Panzer Lehr and the 12th SS to take the strategic Hill 112.[120] Epsom began well with O'Connor's assault force (the British15th Scottish Division) breaking through and with the11th Armoured Division stopping the counter-attacks of the 12th SS Division.[120] GeneralFriedrich Dollmann ofSeventh Army had to commit the newly arrivedII SS Panzer Corps to stop the British offensive.[120] Dollmann, fearing that Epsom would be a success, committed suicide and was replaced by SSOberstegruppenführerPaul Hausser. O'Connor, at the cost of about 4,000 men, had won a salient only 5 miles (8.0 km) deep and 2 miles (3.2 km) wide, but placed the Germans in an unviable long-term position.[120] There was a strong sense of crisis in the Allied command, as the Allies had advanced only about 15 miles (24 km) inland, at a time when their plans called for them to have already takenRennes,Alençon andSt. Malo.[120] After Epsom, Montgomery had to tell GeneralHarry Crerar that the activation of theFirst Canadian Army would have to wait as there was only room at present, in the Caen sector, for the newly arrived XII Corps under Lieutenant-GeneralNeil Ritchie, which caused some tension with Crerar, who was anxious to get into the field.[121] Epsom had forced further German forces into Caen but all through June and the first half of July Rommel, Rundstedt, and Hitler were engaged in planning for a great offensive to drive the British into the sea; it was never launched and would have required the commitment of a large number of German forces to the Caen sector.[122]
It was only after several failed attempts to break out in the Caen sector that Montgomery devised what he later called his "master plan" of having the 21st Army Group hold the bulk of the German forces, thus allowing the Americans to break out.[123] The Canadian historiansTerry Copp and Robert Vogel wrote about the dispute between the "American school" and "British school" after having suffered several setbacks in June 1944:
Montgomery drew what was the indisputably correct conclusion from these events. If the British and Canadians could continue to hold the bulk of the German armoured divisions on their front through a series of limited attacks, they could wear down the Germans and create the conditions for an American breakout on the right.This is what Montgomery proposed in his Directive of June 30th and, if he and his admirers had let the record speak for itself, there would be little debate about his conduct of the first stages of the Normandy campaign. Instead, Montgomery insisted that this Directive was a consistent part of a master plan that he had devised long before the invasion. Curiously, this view does a great disservice to 'Monty' for any rigid planning of operations before the German response was known would have been bad generalship indeed!"[124]
Hampered by stormy weather and thebocage terrain, Montgomery had to ensure that Rommel focused on the British in the east rather than the Americans in the west, who had to take the Cotentin Peninsula and Brittany before the Germans could be trapped by a general swing east.[125] Montgomery told General Sir Miles Dempsey, the commander of Second British Army: "Go on hitting, drawing the German strength, especially some of the armour, onto yourself—so as to ease the way for Brad [Bradley]."[126] The Germans had deployed twelve divisions, of which six were Panzer divisions, against the British while deploying eight divisions, of which three were Panzer divisions, against the Americans.[126] By the middle of July Caen had not been taken, as Rommel continued to prioritise prevention of the break-out by British forces rather than the western territories being taken by the Americans.[127] This was broadly as Montgomery had planned, albeit not with the same speed as he outlined at St Paul's, although as the American historianCarlo D'Este pointed out the actual situation in Normandy was "vastly different" from what was envisioned at the St. Paul's conference, as only one of four goals outlined in May had been achieved by 10 July.[128]
Prime Minister Churchill with General Montgomery at the latter's HQ in Normandy, July 1944
On 7 July, Montgomery beganOperation Charnwood with acarpet bombing offensive that turned much of the French countryside and the city of Caen into a wasteland.[129] The British and Canadians succeeded in advancing into northern Caen before the Germans, who used the ruins to their advantage and stopped the offensive.[130] On 10 July, Montgomery ordered Bradley to takeAvranches, after which U.S.Third Army would be activated to drive towards Le Mans and Alençon.[131] On 14 July 1944, Montgomery wrote to his patron Brooke, saying he had chosen on a "real show down on the eastern flanks, and to loose a Corps of three armoured divisions in the open country about the Caen-Falaise road ... The possibilities are immense; with seven hundred tanks loosed to the South-east of Caen, and the armoured cars operating far ahead, anything can happen."[132] TheFrench Resistance had launched Plan Violet in June 1944 to systematically destroy the telephone system of France, which forced the Germans to use their radios more and more to communicate, and as the code-breakers ofBletchley Park had broken many of the German codes, Montgomery had, thanks to "Ultra" intelligence, a good idea of the German situation.[133] Montgomery thus knew GermanArmy Group B had lost 96,400 men while receiving 5,200 replacements and the Panzer Lehr Division now based atSaint-Lô was down to only 40 tanks.[131] Montgomery later wrote that he knew he had the Normandy campaign won at this point as the Germans had almost no reserves while he had three armoured divisions in reserve.[134]
An American break-out was achieved withOperation Cobra and the encirclement of German forces in theFalaise pocket at the cost of British losses with the diversionaryOperation Goodwood.[135] On the early morning of 18 July 1944, Operation Goodwood began with British heavy bombers beginning carpet bombing attacks that further devastated what was left of Caen and the surrounding countryside.[136] A British tank crewman from theGuards Armoured Division later recalled: "At 0500 hours a distant thunder in the air brought all the sleepy-eyed tank crews out of their blankets. 1,000Lancasters were flying from the sea in groups of three or four at 3,000 feet (910 m). Ahead of them thepathfinders were scattering their flares and before long the first bombs were dropping."[137] A German tankman from the 21st Panzer Division at the receiving end of this bombardment remembered: "We saw little dots detach themselves from the planes, so many of them that the crazy thought occurred to us: are those leaflets? ... Among the thunder of the explosions, we could hear the wounded scream and the insane howling of men who had [been] driven mad."[138] The British bombing had badly smashed the German front-line units. Initially, the three British armoured divisions assigned to lead the offensive, the 7th, 11th and the Guards, made rapid progress and were soon approaching the Borguebus ridge, which dominated the landscape south of Caen, by noon.[139]
General Montgomery stops his car to chat with troops during a tour of I Corps area near Caen, 11 July 1944.
If the British could take the Borguebus Ridge, the way to the plains of northern France would be wide open, and potentially Paris could be taken, which explains the ferocity with which the Germans defended the ridge. One German officer, Lieutenant Baron von Rosen, recalled that to motivate aLuftwaffe officer commanding a battery of four88 mm guns to fight against the British tanks, he had to hold his handgun to the officer's head "and asked him whether he would like to be killed immediately or get a high decoration. He decided for the latter."[140] The well dug-in 88 mm guns around the Borguebus Ridge began taking a toll on the British Sherman tanks, and the countryside was soon dotted with dozens of burning Shermans.[141] One British officer reported with worry: "I see palls of smoke and tanks brewing up with flames belching forth from their turrets. I see men climbing out, on fire like torches, rolling on the ground to try and douse the flames."[141] Despite Montgomery's orders to try to press on, fierce German counter-attacks stopped the British offensive.[141]
The objectives of Operation Goodwood were all achieved except the complete capture of the Bourgebus Ridge, which was only partially taken. The operation was a strategic Allied success in drawing in the last German reserves in Normandy towards the Caen sector away from the American sector, greatly assisting the American breakout in Operation Cobra. By the end of Goodwood on 25 July 1944, the Canadians had finally taken Caen while the British tanks had reached the plains south of Caen, giving Montgomery the "hinge" he had been seeking, while forcing the Germans to commit the last of their reserves to stop the Anglo-Canadian offensive.[142] "Ultra" decrypts indicated that the Germans now facing Bradley were seriously understrength, with Operation Cobra about to commence.[143] During Operation Goodwood, the British had 400 tanks knocked out, with many recovered returning to service. The casualties were 5,500 with 7 miles (11 km) of ground gained.[142] Bradley recognised Montgomery's plan to pin down German armour and allow U.S. forces to break out:
The British and Canadian armies were to decoy the enemy reserves and draw them to their front on the extreme eastern edge of the Allied beachhead. Thus, while Monty taunted the enemy at Caen, we [the Americans] were to make our break on the long roundabout road to Paris. When reckoned in terms of national pride, this British decoy mission became a sacrificial one, for while we tramped around the outside flank, the British were to sit in place and pin down the Germans. Yet strategically it fitted into a logical division of labors, for it was towards Caen that the enemy reserves would race once the alarm was sounded.[144]
The long-running dispute over what Montgomery's "master plan" in Normandy led historians to differ greatly about the purpose of Goodwood. The British journalistMark Urban wrote that the purpose of Goodwood was to draw German troops to their left flank to allow the American forces to break out on the right flank, arguing that Montgomery had to lie to his soldiers about the purpose of Goodwood, as the average British soldier would not have understood why they were being asked to create a diversion to allow the Americans to have the glory of staging the breakout with Operation Cobra.[142] By contrast, the American historian Stephen Power argued that Goodwood was intended to be the "breakout" offensive and not a "holding operation", writing: "It is unrealistic to assert that an operation which called for the use of 4,500 Allied aircraft, 700 artillery pieces and over 8,000 armored vehicles and trucks and that cost the British over 5,500 casualties was conceived and executed for so limited an objective."[145] Power noted that Goodwood and Cobra were supposed to take effect on the same day, 18 July 1944, but Cobra was cancelled owing to heavy rain in the American sector, and argued that both operations were meant to be breakout operations to trap the German armies in Normandy. American military writer Drew Middleton wrote that there is no doubt that Montgomery wanted Goodwood to provide a "shield" for Bradley, but at the same time Montgomery was clearly hoping for more than merely diverting German attention away from the American sector.[146][147] British historianJohn Keegan pointed out that Montgomery made differing statements before Goodwood about the purpose of the operation.[148] Keegan wrote that Montgomery engaged in what he called a "hedging of his bets" when drafting his plans for Goodwood, with a plan for a "break out if the front collapsed, if not, sound documentary evidence that all he had intended in the first place was a battle of attrition".[149] Again Bradley confirmed Montgomery's plan and that the capture of Caen was only incidental to his mission, not critical. The American magazineLIFE quoted Bradley in 1951:
While Collins was hoisting hisVII Corps flag over Cherbourg, Montgomery was spending his reputation in a bitter siege against the old university city of Caen. For three weeks he had rammed his troops against those panzer divisions he had deliberately drawn towards that city as part of our Allied strategy of diversion in the Normandy Campaign. Although Caen contained an important road junction that Montgomery would eventually need, for the moment the capture of that city was only incidental to his mission. For Monty's primary task was to attract German troops to the British front that we might more easily secure Cherbourg and get into position for the breakout.While this diversion of Montgomery's was brilliantly achieved, he nevertheless left himself open to criticism by overemphasising the importance of his thrust toward Caen. Had he limited himself simply to the containment without making Caen a symbol of it, he would have been credited with success instead of being charged, as he was, with failure.[150]
With Goodwood drawing the Wehrmacht towards the British sector, U.S.First Army enjoyed a two-to-one numerical superiority. Bradley accepted Montgomery's advice to begin the offensive by concentrating at one point instead of a "broad front" as Eisenhower would have preferred.[151]
Operation Goodwood almost cost Montgomery his job, as Eisenhower seriously considered sacking him and only chose not to do so because to sack the popular "Monty" would have caused such a political backlash in Britain against the Americans at a critical moment in the war that the resulting strains in the Atlantic alliance were not considered worth it.[152] Montgomery expressed his satisfaction at the results of Goodwood when calling the operation off. Eisenhower was under the impression that Goodwood was to be a break-out operation. Either there was a miscommunication between the two men or Eisenhower did not understand the strategy.[153] Bradley fully understood Montgomery's intentions. Both men would not give away to the press the true intentions of their strategy.[154]
General Montgomery with Lieutenant GeneralsGeorge S. Patton (left) andOmar Bradley (centre) at 21st Army Group HQ, 7 July 1944
Many American officers had found Montgomery a difficult man to work with, and after Goodwood, pressured Eisenhower to fire Montgomery.[142] Although the Eisenhower–Montgomery dispute is sometimes depicted in nationalist terms as being an Anglo-American struggle, it was the British Air Chief Marshal Sir Arthur Tedder who was pressing Eisenhower most strongly after Goodwood to fire Montgomery.[155] An American officer wrote in his diary that Tedder had come to see Eisenhower to "pursue his current favourite subject, the sacking of Monty".[156] With Tedder leading the "sack Monty" campaign, it encouraged Montgomery's American enemies to press Eisenhower to fire Montgomery.[156] Brooke was sufficiently worried about the "sack Monty" campaign to visit Montgomery at his Tactical Headquarters (TAC) in France and as he wrote in his diary; "warned [Montgomery] of a tendency in the PM [Churchill] to listen to suggestions that Monty played for safety and was not prepared to take risks".[142] Brooke advised Montgomery to invite Churchill to Normandy, arguing that if the "sack Monty" campaign had won the Prime Minister over, then his career would be over, as having Churchill's backing would give Eisenhower the political "cover" to fire Montgomery.[156] On 20 July, Montgomery met Eisenhower and on 21 July, Churchill, at the TAC in France.[156] One of Montgomery's staff officers wrote afterwards that it was "common knowledge at Tac that Churchill had come to sack Monty".[156] No notes were taken at the Eisenhower–Montgomery and Churchill–Montgomery meetings, but Montgomery was able to persuade both men not to sack him.[151]
With the success of Cobra, which was soon followed by unleashing Patton's Third Army, Eisenhower wrote to Montgomery: "Am delighted that your basic plan has begun brilliantly to unfold with Bradley's initial success."[157] The success of Cobra was aided byOperation Spring, when theII Canadian Corps under GeneralGuy Simonds (the only Canadian general whose skill Montgomery respected) began an offensive south of Caen that made little headway, but which the Germans regarded as the main offensive.[158] Once Third Army arrived, Bradley was promoted to take command of the newly created12th Army Group, consisting of U.S. First and Third Armies. Following the American breakout, there followed the Battle of Falaise Gap. British, Canadian, and Polish soldiers of 21st Army Group commanded by Montgomery advanced south, while the American and French soldiers of Bradley's 12th Army Group advanced north to encircle the German Army Group B at Falaise, as Montgomery waged what Urban called "a huge battle of annihilation" in August 1944.[157] Montgomery began his offensive into theSuisse Normande region withOperation Bluecoat, with Sir Richard O'Connor'sVIII Corps andGerard Bucknall'sXXX Corps heading south.[159] A dissatisfied Montgomery sacked Bucknall for being insufficiently aggressive and replaced him with GeneralBrian Horrocks.[159] At the same time, Montgomery ordered Patton—whose Third Army was supposed to advance into Brittany—to instead captureNantes, which was soon taken.[159]
Hitler waited too long to order his soldiers to retreat from Normandy, leading Montgomery to write: "He [Hitler] refused to face the only sound military course. As a result the Allies caused the enemy staggering losses in men and materials."[157] Knowing via "Ultra" that Hitler was not planning to retreat from Normandy, Montgomery, on 6 August 1944, ordered an envelopment operation against Army Group B—with the First Canadian Army under Harry Crerar to advance towards Falaise, British Second Army under Miles Dempsey to advance towardsArgentan, and Patton's Third Army to advance toAlençon.[160] On 11 August, Montgomery changed his plan, with the Canadians to take Falaise and to meet the Americans at Argentan.[160] The First Canadian Army launched two operations,Operation Totalize on 7 August, which advanced only 9 miles (14 km) in four days in the face of fierce German resistance, andOperation Tractable on 14 August, which finally took Falaise on 17 August.[161] In view of the slow Canadian advance, Patton requested permission to take Falaise, but was refused by Bradley on 13 August. This prompted much controversy, many historians arguing that Bradley lacked aggression and that Montgomery should have overruled Bradley.[162]
The so-calledFalaise Gap was closed on 22 August 1944, but several American generals, most notably Patton, accused Montgomery of being insufficiently aggressive in closing it. About 60,000 German soldiers were trapped in Normandy, but before 22 August, about 20,000 Germans had escaped through the Falaise Gap.[157] About 10,000 Germans had been killed in the Battle of the Falaise Gap, which led a stunned Eisenhower, who viewed the battlefield on 24 August, to comment with horror that it was impossible to walk without stepping on corpses.[163] The successful conclusion of the Normandy campaign saw the beginning of the debate between the "American school" and "British school" as both American and British generals started to advance claims about who was most responsible for this victory.[157] Brooke wrote in defence of his protégé Montgomery: "Ike knows nothing about strategy and is 'quite' unsuited to the post of Supreme Commander. It is no wonder that Monty's real high ability is not always realised. Especially so when 'national' spectacles pervert the perspective of the strategic landscape."[164] About Montgomery's conduct of the Normandy campaign, Badsey wrote:
Too much discussion on Normandy has centered on the controversial decisions of the Allied commanders. It was not good enough, apparently, to win such a complete and spectacular victory over an enemy that had conquered most of Europe unless it was done perfectly. Most of the blame for this lies with Montgomery, who was foolish enough to insist that ithad been done perfectly, that Normandy—and all his other battles—had been fought accordingly to a precise master plan drawn up beforehand, from which he never deviated. It says much for his personality that Montgomery found others to agree with him, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. His handling of the Battle of Normandy was of a very high order, and as the person who would certainly have been blamed for losing the battle, he deserves the credit for winning it.[165]
Eisenhower took over Ground Forces Command on 1 September, while continuing as Supreme Commander, with Montgomery continuing to command the 21st Army Group, now consisting mainly of British and Canadian units. Montgomery vehemently opposed this change, although it had been agreed before the D-Day invasion,[166] instead proposing that either he or Bradley should remain in the job of Ground Forces command. He argued that the two roles were fundamentally different and that Eisenhower possessed the skillset for the former but not the latter; as such, he was liable to neglect the duties of one or the other, rendering the force off-balance. Instead, there was a need for a single decisive master plan under a leader free from the more administrative and political duties of the Supreme Commander - Montgomery felt he was the best equipped to deliver this, but was clear that he would also have been willing to work under Bradley.[167]
Eisenhower and many others failed to grasp this however, and would misinterpret this as Montgomery's pride being wounded at having command removed. As such, they would attempt to placate him by reassuring him of the areas remaining under his command,[168] and Winston Churchill had Montgomery promoted toField Marshal[169] by way of compensation.[166] In addition, the British journalist Mark Urban points out that Montgomery seemed unable to grasp however that as the majority of the 2.2 million Allied soldiers fighting against Germany on the Western Front were now American (the ratio was 3:1) that it was politically unacceptable to American public opinion to have Montgomery remain as Land Forces Commander as: "Politics would not allow him to carry on giving orders to great armies of Americans simply because, in his view, [he was the best man for the job]".[170]
By September, ports likeCherbourg were too far away from the front line, causing the Allies great logistical problems. Antwerp was the third largest port in Europe. It was a deep water inland port connected to the North Sea via the riverScheldt. The Scheldt was wide enough and dredged deep enough to allow the passage of ocean-going ships.[171]
On 3 September 1944 Hitler orderedFifteenth Army, which had been stationed in the Pas de Calais region and was withdrawing north into the Low Countries, to hold the mouth of the river Scheldt to deprive the Allies of the use of Antwerp.[172] Von Rundstedt, the German commander of the Western Front, ordered GeneralGustav-Adolf von Zangen, the commander of 15th Army, that: "The attempt of the enemy to occupy the West Scheldt in order to obtain the free use of the harbor of Antwerp must beresisted to the utmost" (emphasis in the original).[173] Rundstedt argued with Hitler that as long as the Allies could not use the port of Antwerp, the Allies would lack the logistical capacity for an invasion of Germany.[173]
TheWitte Brigade (White Brigade) of the Belgian resistance had captured thePort of Antwerp before the Germans could destroy key port facilities,[174] and on 4 September, Antwerp was captured by Horrocks with its harbour mostly intact.[175] The British declined to immediately advance over theAlbert Canal, and an opportunity to destroy the German Fifteenth Army was lost.[174] The Germans had mined the river Scheldt, the mouth of the Scheldt was still in German hands making it impossible for theRoyal Navy to clear the mines in the river, and therefore the port of Antwerp was still useless to the Allies.[176]
On 5 September,SHAEF's naval commander, Admiral SirBertram Ramsay, had urged Montgomery to make clearing the mouth of the Scheldt his number-one priority. Alone among the senior commanders, only Ramsay saw opening Antwerp as crucial.[177] Thanks to "Ultra," Montgomery was aware of Hitler's order by 5 September.[172]
On 9 September, Montgomery wrote to Brooke that "one good Pas de Calais port" would be sufficient to meet all the logistical needs of the 21st Army Group, but only the supply needs of the same formation.[178] At the same time, Montgomery noted that "one good Pas de Calais port" would be insufficient for the American armies in France, which would thus force Eisenhower, if for no other reasons than logistics, to favour Montgomery's plans for an invasion of northern Germany by the 21st Army Group, whereas if Antwerp were opened up, then all of the Allied armies could be supplied.[179]
The importance of ports closer to Germany was highlighted with the liberation of the city ofLe Havre, which was assigned toJohn Crocker'sI Corps.[178] To take Le Havre, two infantry divisions, two tank brigades, most of the artillery of the BritishSecond Army, the specialised armoured "gadgets" of Percy Hobart's79th Armoured Division, the battleshipHMS Warspite and the monitorHMS Erebus were all committed.[178] On 10 September 1944,RAF Bomber Command dropped 4,719 tons of bombs on Le Havre, which was the prelude toOperation Astonia, the assault on Le Havre by Crocker's men, which was taken two days later.[178] The Canadian historianTerry Copp wrote that the commitment of this much firepower and men to take only one French city might "seem excessive", but by this point, the Allies desperately needed ports closer to the front line to sustain their advance.[178]
In September 1944, Montgomery ordered Crerar and his First Canadian Army to take the French ports on the English Channel, namelyCalais,Boulogne andDunkirk,[178] and to clear the Scheldt, a task that Crerar stated was impossible as he lacked enough troops to perform both operations at once.[180] Montgomery refused Crerar's request to have British XII Corps under Neil Ritchie assigned to help clear the Scheldt as Montgomery stated he needed XII Corps forOperation Market Garden.[181] On 6 September 1944, Montgomery told Crerar that "I want Boulogne badly" and that city should be taken no matter what the cost.[178] On 22 September 1944, Simonds's II Canadian Corpstook Boulogne, followed up bytaking Calais on 1 October 1944.[182] Montgomery was highly impatient with Simonds, complaining that it had taken Crocker's I Corps only two days to take Le Havre while it took Simonds two weeks to take Boulogne and Calais, but Simonds noted that at Le Havre, three divisions and two brigades had been employed, whereas at both Boulogne and Calais, only two brigades were sent in to take both cities.[183] After an attempt to storm theLeopold Canal by the4th Canadian Division had been badly smashed by the German defenders, Simonds ordered a stop to further attempts to clear the river Scheldt until his mission of capturing the French ports on the English Channel had been accomplished; this allowed the German Fifteenth Army ample time to dig into its new home on the Scheldt.[184] The only port that was not captured by the Canadians was Dunkirk, as Montgomery ordered the 2nd Canadian Division on 15 September to hold his flank at Antwerp as a prelude for an advance up the Scheldt.[171]
Holland, 13 October 1944: Montgomery outlines his future strategy to KingGeorge VI in his mobile headquarters.
Montgomery pulled away from the First Canadian Army (temporarily commanded now by Simonds as Crerar was ill), the British51st Highland Division,1st Polish Division, British49th (West Riding) Infantry Division and2nd Canadian Armoured Brigade, and sent all of these formations to help the Second British Army to expand the Market Garden salient with OperationsConstellation,Aintree, and towards the end of OctoberPheasant.[185] However, Simonds seems to have regarded the Scheldt campaign as a test of his ability, and he felt he could clear the Scheldt with only three Canadian divisions, despite having to take on the entire Fifteenth Army, which held strongly fortified positions in a landscape that favoured the defence.[186] Simonds never complained about the lack of air support (made worse by the cloudy October weather), shortages of ammunition or having insufficient troops, regarding these problems as challenges for him to overcome, rather than a cause for complaint.[186] As it was, Simonds made only slow progress in October 1944 during the fighting in theBattle of the Scheldt, although he was praised by Copp for imaginative and aggressive leadership who managed to achieve much, despite all of the odds against him.[187] Montgomery had little respect for the Canadian generals, whom he dismissed as mediocre, with the exception of Simonds, whom he consistently praised as Canada's only "first-rate" general in the entire war.[178]
Admiral Ramsay, who proved to be a far more articulate and forceful champion of the Canadians than their own generals, starting on 9 October demanded of Eisenhower in a meeting that he either order Montgomery to make supporting the First Canadian Army in the Scheldt fighting his number one priority or sack him.[188] Ramsay in very strong language argued to Eisenhower that the Allies could only invade Germany if Antwerp was opened, and that as long as the three Canadian divisions fighting in the Scheldt had shortages of ammunition and artillery shells because Montgomery made the Arnhem salient his first priority, then Antwerp would not be opened anytime soon.[188] Even Brooke wrote in his diary: "I feel that Monty's strategy for once is at fault. Instead of carrying out the advance to Arnhem he ought to have made certain of Antwerp".[188] On 9 October 1944, at Ramsay's urging, Eisenhower sent Montgomery a cable that emphasised the "supreme importance of Antwerp", that "the Canadian Army will not, repeat not, be able to attack until November unless immediately supplied with adequate ammunition", and warned that the Allied advance into Germany would totally stop by mid-November unless Antwerp was opened by October.[188] Montgomery replied by accusing Ramsay of making "wild statements" unsupported by the facts, denying the Canadians were having to ration ammunition, and claimed that he would soon take the Ruhr thereby making the Scheldt campaign a sideshow.[188] Montgomery further issued a memo entitled "Notes on Command in Western Europe" demanding that he once again be made Land Forces Commander. This led to an exasperated Eisenhower telling Montgomery that the question was not the command arrangement but rather his (Montgomery's) ability and willingness to obey orders. Eisenhower further told Montgomery to either obey orders to immediately clear the mouth of the Scheldt or be sacked.[189]
A chastised Montgomery told Eisenhower on 15 October 1944 that he was now making clearing the Scheldt his "top priority", and the ammunition shortages in the First Canadian Army, a problem which he denied even existed five days earlier, were now over as supplying the Canadians was henceforth his first concern.[189] Simonds, now reinforced with British troops andRoyal Marines, cleared the Scheldt by takingWalcheren island, the last of the German "fortresses" on the Scheldt, on 8 November 1944.[190] With the Scheldt in Allied hands, Royal Navy minesweepers removed the German mines in the river, and Antwerp was finally opened to shipping on 28 November 1944.[190] Reflecting Antwerp's importance, the Germans spent the winter of 1944–45 firing V-1 flying bombs andV-2 rockets at it in an attempt to shut down the port, and theGerman offensive in December 1944 in the Ardennes had as its ultimate objective the capture of Antwerp.[190] Urban wrote that Montgomery's most "serious failure" in the entire war was not the well publicisedBattle of Arnhem, but rather his lack of interest in opening up Antwerp, as without it the entire Allied advance from the North Sea to the Swiss Alps stalled in the autumn of 1944 for logistical reasons.[191]
Montgomery was able to persuade Eisenhower to allow him to test his strategy of a single thrust to theRuhr with Operation Market Garden in September 1944. The offensive was strategically bold,[192] although Lieutenant GeneralHumfrey Gale, the "senior administrative and logistics officer"[193] for SHAEF (Supreme Headquarters Allied Expeditionary Force) considered Montgomery's narrow-thrust strategy to be "logistically unrealistic",[193] and in his opinion "a ruse merely to demonstrate later that he had been prevented from winning the war quickly by Eisenhower's caution."[193] At a strategy meeting on 10 September 1944, Montgomery became so belligerent that Eisenhower was prompted into saying "Steady, Monty! You can't speak to me like that. I'm your boss."[193] Following the Allied breakout from Normandy, Eisenhower favored pursuing the German armies northwards and eastwards to theRhine on a broad front. Eisenhower relied on speed, which in turn depended on logistics, which were "stretched to the limit".[194] SHAEF did provide Montgomery with additional resources, principally additionallocomotives androlling stock, and priority for air supply.[195] Eisenhower's decision to launch Market Garden was influenced by his desire to keep the retreating Germans under pressure, and by the pressure from the United States to use theFirst Allied Airborne Army as soon as possible.[196]
Montgomery's plan for Operation Market Garden (17–25 September 1944) was to outflank theSiegfried Line and cross the Rhine, setting the stage for later offensives into the Ruhr region. The 21st Army Group would attack north from Belgium, 60 miles (97 km) through the Netherlands, across the Rhine and consolidate north of Arnhem on the far side of the Rhine. The risky plan required three Airborne Divisions to capture numerous intact bridges along a single-lane road, on which an entire Corps had to attack and use as its main supply route. The offensive failed to achieve its objectives.[197]
Both Churchill and Montgomery claimed that the operation was nearly or 90% successful, "since they had got nine-tenths of the way to Arnhem",[198] prompting Air Chief Marshal Tedder to derisively comment that "one jumps off a cliff with an even higher success rate, until the last few inches."[198] However, in Montgomery's equivocal acceptance of responsibility he blames lack of support, and also refers to theBattle of the Scheldt, which was undertaken by Canadian troops not involved in Market Garden. Montgomery later said:
It was a bad mistake on my part—I underestimated the difficulties of opening up the approaches to Antwerp ... I reckoned the Canadian Army could do it while we were going for the Ruhr. I was wrong ... In my—prejudiced—view, if the operation had been properly backed from its inception, and given the aircraft, ground forces, and administrative resources necessary for the job, it would have succeededin spite of my mistakes, or the adverse weather, or the presence of the 2nd SS Panzer Corps in the Arnhem area. I remain Market Garden's unrepentant advocate.[199]
In the aftermath of Market Garden, Montgomery made holding the Arnhem salient his first priority, arguing that the British Second Army might still be able to break through and reach the wide open plains of northern Germany, and that he might be able to take the Ruhr by the end of October.[200] The Germans underGeneralfeldmarschallWalther Model attempted toretake the Nijmegen salient in early October, but were beaten back. In the meantime, the First Canadian Army finally achieved the task of clearing the mouth of the river Scheldt, despite the fact that, in the words of Copp and Vogel, "Montgomery's Directive required the Canadians to continue to fight alone for almost two weeks in a battle which everyone agreed could only be won with the aid of additional divisions".[201]
On 16 December 1944, at the start of the Battle of the Bulge, Montgomery's 21st Army Group was on the northern flank of the allied lines. Bradley'sUS 12th Army Group was to Montgomery's south, withWilliam Simpson'sU.S. Ninth Army adjacent to 21st Army Group,Courtney Hodges'U.S. First Army holding the Ardennes and Patton's U.S. Third Army further south.[202]
Field Marshal Montgomery talking with Lieutenant General Simpson, GOC U.S. Ninth Army, and Major GeneralJohn Anderson, GOCU.S. XVI Corps. Behind are Lieutenant General Bradley and Field Marshal Brooke.
SHAEF believed the Wehrmacht was no longer capable of launching a major offensive, and that no offensive could be launched through such rugged terrain as theArdennes Forest. Because of this, the area was held by refitting and newly arrived American formations.[202] The Wehrmacht planned to exploit this by making a surprise attack through the Ardennes Forest whilst bad weather grounded Allied air power, splitting the Allied Armies in two. They would then turn north to recapture the port of Antwerp.[203] If the attack were to succeed in capturing Antwerp, the whole of 21st Army Group, along with U.S. Ninth Army and most of U.S. First Army would be trapped without supplies behind German lines.[204]
The attack initially advanced rapidly, splitting U.S. 12th Army Group in two, with all of U.S. Ninth Army and the bulk of U.S. First Army on the northern shoulder of the German 'bulge'. The 12th Army Group commander, Bradley, was located in Luxembourg, making command of the U.S. forces north of the bulge problematic. As Montgomery was the nearest army group commander on the ground, on 20 December, Eisenhower temporarily transferred command of U.S. Ninth Army and U.S. First Army to Montgomery's 21st Army Group. Bradley was "concerned because it might discredit the American command" but that it might mean Montgomery would commit more of his reserves to the battle. In practice the change led to "great resentment on the part of many Americans, particularly at Headquarters, 12th Army Group, and Third Army".[205]
With the British and American forces under Montgomery's command holding the northern flank of the German assault, General Patton's Third Army, which was 90 miles (140 km) to the south, turned north and fought its way through the severe weather and German opposition to relieve thebesieged American forces in Bastogne. Four days after Montgomery took command of the northern flank, the bad weather cleared and theUSAAF and RAF[206] resumed operations, inflicting heavy casualties on German troops and vehicles. Six days after Montgomery took command of the northern flank, Patton's Third Army relieved the besieged American forces in Bastogne. Unable to advance further, and running out of fuel, the Wehrmacht abandoned the offensive.[202][207]
Field Marshal Montgomery and senior officers of the6th Airborne Division in the Ardennes, January 1945.
Morelock states that Montgomery was preoccupied with leading a "single thrust offensive" to Berlin as the overall commander of Allied ground forces, and that he accordingly treated the Ardennes counteroffensive "as a sideshow, to be finished with the least possible effort and expenditure of resources."[208]
Montgomery subsequently wrote of his actions:
The first thing to do was to see the battle on the northern flank as one whole, to ensure the vital areas were held securely, and to create reserves for counter-attack. I embarked on these measures: I put British troops under command of the Ninth Army to fight alongside American soldiers, and made that Army take over some of the First Army Front. I positioned British troops as reserves behind the First and Ninth Armies until such time as American reserves could be created.[209]
After the warHasso von Manteuffel, who commanded the5th Panzer Army in the Ardennes, was imprisoned awaiting trial for war crimes. During this period he was interviewed byB. H. Liddell Hart, a British author who has since been accused of putting words in the mouths of German generals, and attempting to "rewrite the historical record".[210][211][212][213] After conducting several interviews via an interpreter, Liddell Hart in a subsequent book attributed to Manteuffel the following statement about Montgomery's contribution to the battle in the Ardennes:
The operations of the American 1st Army had developed into a series of individual holding actions. Montgomery's contribution to restoring the situation was that he turned a series of isolated actions into a coherent battle fought according to a clear and definite plan. It was his refusal to engage in premature and piecemeal counter-attacks which enabled the Americans to gather their reserves and frustrate the German attempts to extend their breakthrough.[214]
However, American historianStephen Ambrose, writing in 1997, maintained that "Putting Monty in command of the northern flank had no effect on the battle".[215] Ambrose wrote that: "Far from directing the victory, Montgomery had gotten in everyone's way, and had botched the counter-attack."[216] General Omar Bradley blamed Montgomery's "stagnating conservatism" for his failure to counter-attack when ordered to do so by Eisenhower.[217]
Command of U.S. First Army reverted to 12th Army Group on 17 January 1945,[218] whilst command of U.S. Ninth Army remained with 21st Army Group for the coming operations to cross the Rhine.[219]
21st Army Group's river crossing was followed by the encirclement of theRuhr Pocket. During this battle, U.S. Ninth Army, which had remained part of 21st Army Group after the Battle of the Bulge, formed the northern arm of the envelopment of GermanArmy Group B, with U.S. First Army forming the southern arm. The two armies linked up on 1 April 1945, encircling 370,000 German troops, and on 4 April 1945, Ninth Army reverted to Omar Bradley's 12th Army Group.[221]
By the war's end, the remaining formations of 21st Army group, First Canadian Army and British Second Army, had liberated the northern part of the Netherlands and captured much of north-west Germany, occupiedHamburg andRostock and sealed off theJutland peninsula.[222]
As CIGS, Montgomery toured Africa in 1947 and in a secret 1948 report to Prime MinisterClement Attlee's government proposed a "master plan" to amalgamate British Africa territories and to exploit the raw materials of Africa, thereby counteracting the loss of British influence in Asia.[223] Montgomery sought to strengthen white rule to serve as a bulwark against communism. He described Africans as uncivilized, stating "he is a complete savage and is quite incapable of developing the country himself." His statements were publicized in 1999. After learning of Montgomery's remarks, one of his biographers,Lord Chalfont, said his reputation had been "irredeemably damaged... I find it very disappointing and depressing."[225]
However, Montgomery was barely on speaking terms with his fellow service chiefs, sending his deputyKenneth Crawford to attend their meetings[224] and he clashed particularly with SirArthur Tedder, who was by nowChief of the Air Staff (CAS).[223]
When Montgomery's term of office expired, Prime Minister Attlee appointed SirWilliam Slim from retirement with the rank offield marshal as his successor. When Montgomery protested that he had told his protégé, General Sir John Crocker, former commander ofI Corps in the 1944–45North-West Europe Campaign, that the job was to be his, Attlee is said to have retorted "Untell him."[226]
Montgomery was then appointed Chairman of theWestern Union Defence Organization's C-in-C committee.[224] Volume 3 ofNigel Hamilton'sLife of Montgomery of Alamein gives an account of the bickering between Montgomery and his land forces chief, French GeneralJean de Lattre de Tassigny, which created splits through the Union headquarters.[227]
In the mid-1950s, theIllustrated London News published sets of photographs taken by Montgomery while flying over theSwiss Alps. In February 1957, views of MountTödi taken with aRolleiflex camera were reproduced.[234]
Montgomery's memoirs (1958) criticised many of his wartime comrades in harsh terms, including Eisenhower.[236] Montgomery was stripped of his honorary citizenship ofMontgomery, Alabama, and was challenged to a duel by an Italian lawyer.[237]
He was threatened with legal action by Field Marshal Auchinleck for suggesting that Auchinleck had intended to retreat from the Alamein position if attacked again, and had to give a radio broadcast (20 November 1958) expressing his gratitude to Auchinleck for having stabilised the front at the First Battle of Alamein.[238] The 1960 paperback edition of Montgomery's memoirs contains a publisher's note drawing attention to that broadcast, and stating that although the reader might assume from Montgomery's text that Auchinleck had been planning to retreat "into the Nile Delta or beyond" in the publisher's view it had been Auchinleck's intention to launch an offensive as soon as the Eighth Army was "rested and regrouped".[239]
Montgomery mentioned to the American journalistJohn Gunther in April 1944 that (like Alanbrooke) he kept a secret diary. Gunther remarked that it would surely be an essential source for historians. When Montgomery asked whether it would be worth money one day, Gunther suggested "at least $100,000." This was converted into pounds sterling, and he is supposed to have grinned and said "Well, I guess I won't die in the poor house after all."[240]
Montgomery twice met Israeli generalMoshe Dayan. After an initial meeting in the early 1950s, Montgomery met Dayan again in the 1960s to discuss theVietnam War, which Dayan was studying. Montgomery was harshly critical of US strategy in Vietnam, which involved deploying large numbers of combat troops, aggressive bombing attacks, and uprooting entire village populations and forcing them intostrategic hamlets. Montgomery said that the Americans' most important problem was that they had no clear objective, and allowed local commanders to set military policy. At the end of their meeting, Montgomery asked Dayan to tell the Americans, in his name, that they were "insane".[241] In a 1968 interview, he expressed the opinion that the United States should give up its efforts and accept a Communist-dominated Vietnam, remarking "you have got to stop this war. You can't win. What is the point of all these casualties?" He argued that the war was unwinnable and making the United States internationally unpopular. He expressed the opinion thatChina would eventually dominate Asia, with all countries bordering China except forIndia eventually come under Chinese influence and that the United States should focus on maintaining dominance of the oceans rather than committing land forces to Asia.[242]
During a visit to the Alamein battlefields in May 1967, he bluntly told high-rankingEgyptian Army officers that they would lose any war with Israel, a warning that was shown to be justified only a few weeks later in theSix-Day War.[243]
In retirement, Montgomery publicly supportedapartheid after a visit to South Africa in 1962, and after a visit to China declared himself impressed by the Chinese leadership led by ChairmanMao Tse-tung.[244][245] He spoke out against the legalisation of homosexuality in the United Kingdom, arguing that theSexual Offences Act 1967 was a "charter for buggery"[246] and that "this sort of thing may be tolerated by the French, but we're British—thank God".[247]
Montgomery's Grant command tank, on display at theImperial War Museum in London
TheImperial War Museum holds a variety of material relating to Montgomery in its collections. These include Montgomery'sGrant command tank (on display in the atrium at the museum's London branch), his command caravans as used in North West Europe (on display atIWM Duxford), and his papers are held by the museum's Department of Documents. The museum maintains a permanent exhibition about Montgomery, entitledMonty: Master of the Battlefield.[258]
The Montgomery cocktail is amartini mixed at a ratio of 15 parts gin to 1 part vermouth, and popular withErnest Hemingway atHarry's Bar in Venice.[261] The drink was facetiously named for Montgomery's supposed refusal to go into battle unless his numerical advantage was at least fifteen to one, and it appeared in Hemingway's 1950 novelAcross the River and into the Trees. Ironically, following severe internal injuries received in the First World War, Montgomery himself could neither smoke nor drink.[192]
Montgomery appears as a character, "The Field Marshall," inAnthony Powell's 1968 novel,The Military Philosophers, the ninth volume of his twelve volume series,A Dance to the Music of Time. Montgomery is one of the few real people to appear as themselves in the fictional series. Powell knew Montgomery during the war when he worked as a liaison officer.[262][263]
The British high command were not only concerned with winning the war and defeating Germany, but also with ensuring that it retained sufficient influence in the post-war world to govern global policy. Suffering heavy losses in Normandy would diminish British leadership and prestige within itsempire and in post-war Europe in particular.[264] Many of Montgomery's clashes with Eisenhower were based on his determination to pursue the war "on lines most suitable to Britain".[265]
The smaller the number of combat-experienced divisions the British had left at the end of the war, the smaller Britain's influence in Europe was likely to be, compared to the emerging superpowers of the United States and the Soviet Union. Montgomery was thus caught in a dilemma—theBritish Army needed to be seen to be pulling at least half the weight in the liberation of Europe, but without incurring the heavy casualties that such a role would inevitably produce. 21st Army Group scarcely possessed sufficient forces to achieve such a military prominence, and the remaining divisions had to be expended sparingly.[266]
In 1944, Britain did not possess the manpower to rebuild shattered divisions and it was imperative for Montgomery to protect the viability of the British Army. It was reported to theWar Office that "Montgomery has to be very careful of what he does on his eastern flank because on that flank is the only British Army there is left in this part of the world". The context of British casualties and the shortage of reinforcements, prompted Montgomery to "excessive caution".[267] Dempsey wrote on 13 June, that Caen could only be taken by a "set piece assault and we did not have the men or the ammunition for that at the time".[268]
Montgomery's solution to the dilemma was to attempt to remain Commander of All Land Forces until the end of the war, so that any victory attained on the Western front—although achieved primarily by American formations—would accrue in part to him and thus to Britain. He would also be able to ensure that British units were spared some of the high-attrition actions, but would be most prominent when the final blows were struck.[269] When that strategy failed, he persuaded Eisenhower to occasionally put some American formations under the control of the 21st Army Group, so as to bolster his resources while still maintaining the outward appearance of successful British effort.[270]
Montgomery initially remained prepared to push Second (British) Army hard to capture the vital strategic town of Caen, and consequently incur heavy losses. In the original Overlord plan, Montgomery was determined to push past Caen to Falaise as quickly as possible. However, after the heavy casualties incurred in capturing Caen, he changed his mind.[271]
Other academic commentators have also suggested that the British strategy was "to avoid the heavy casualties of the major battles of the First World War".[272]
Throughout the war, Montgomery was notorious for his lack of tact and diplomacy. Even his "patron", the Chief of the Imperial General Staff, General Sir Alan Brooke, frequently mentions it in his war diaries: "he is liable to commit untold errors in lack of tact" and "I had to haul him over the coals for his usual lack of tact and egotistical outlook which prevented him from appreciating other people's feelings".[273] Montgomery suffered from "an overbearing conceit and an uncontrollable urge for self-promotion." GeneralHastings Ismay, who was at the time Winston Churchill's chief staff officer and trusted military adviser, once said of him: "I have come to the conclusion that his love of publicity is a disease, like alcoholism or taking drugs, and that it sends him equally mad."[274][275][276] The psychiatristMichael Fitzgerald has argued that Montgomery was likelyautistic,[277] and it has been speculated that this was the cause of many of apparent behaviours and eccentricities.[278]
A notorious instance of Montgomery's behaviour occurred during the North African campaign when he betWalter Bedell Smith that he could captureSfax by the middle of April 1943. Smith jokingly replied that if Montgomery could do it he would give him aFlying Fortress complete with crew. Smith promptly forgot all about it, but Montgomery did not, and when Sfax was taken on 10 April, he sent a message to Smith "claiming his winnings". Smith tried to laugh it off, but Montgomery insisted on his aircraft. The incident was finally resolved by Eisenhower who, with his renowned skill in diplomacy, ensured Montgomery did get his Flying Fortress, though at a great cost in ill feeling.[279][280]
Antony Beevor, in discussing Montgomery's counterproductive lack of tact in the final months of the war, described him as "insufferable". Beevor says that in January 1945 Montgomery had tried to claim far too much credit for the British (and for himself) in defeating the German counter-attack in the Ardennes in December 1944. This "crass and unpleasant blunder" helped make it impossible for Churchill and Alan Brooke to persuade Eisenhower of the need for an immediate thrust—to be led by Montgomery—through Germany to Berlin. Eisenhower did not accept the viability of the "dagger thrust" approach, it had already been agreed that Berlin would fall into the future Soviet occupation zone, and he was not willing to accept heavy casualties for no gain, so Eisenhower disregarded the British suggestions and continued with his conservative broad front strategy, and theRed Army reached Berlin well ahead of the Western Allies.[281]
In August 1945, while Brooke, SirAndrew Cunningham and SirCharles Portal were discussing their possible successors as "Chiefs of Staff", they concluded that Montgomery would be very efficient asCIGS from the Army's point of view but that he was also very unpopular with a large proportion of the Army. Despite this, Cunningham and Portal were strongly in favour of Montgomery succeeding Brooke after his retirement.[282] Churchill, by all accounts a faithful friend, is quoted as saying of Montgomery, "In defeat, unbeatable; in victory, unbearable."[283]
Mentioned in Despatches (UK, 17 February 1915, 4 January 1917, 11 December 1917, 20 May 1918, 20 December 1918, 5 July 1919, 15 July 1939, 24 June 1943,[286] 13 January 1944[287])
^Stacey, Charles P. Official History of the Canadian Army in the Second World War: Six Years of War: The Army in Canada, Britain and the Pacific. Ottawa: Queen's Printer, 1966.
^Churchill, p. 420. According to J. Toland,Battle: The Story of the Bulge, 1959, p. 157, this conversation was with Churchill's chief military assistant, GeneralIsmay, beginning with Montgomery saying to Ismay, "It's a sad thing that a professional soldier can reach the peak of generalship and then suffer a reverse which ruins his career."
^abTerrible Victory: First Canadian Army and the Scheldt Estuary Campaign: 13 September – 6 November 1944; by Mark Zuehlke; pp. 45–50; D & M Publishers, 2009;ISBN978-1926685809
^abMichael Lee Lanning, James F. (FRW) Dunnigan.The Military 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Leaders of All Time. Citadel Press. p. 235.
^abcdBuckley, John (2013).Monty's Men: The British Army and the Liberation of Europe, 1944-5. New Haven: Yale University Press. p. 213.ISBN978-0-300-13449-0.
^Pogue, Forrest C. (1954)."Chapter XX. Winter Counteroffensives".The Supreme Command. United States Army in World War II. European Theater of Operations. Washington DC: U.S. Department of the Army. p. 378. CMH Pub. 7-1 – via Hyperwar Foundation.
^"The RAF in WWII". The Royal Air Force. 7 May 1945. Archived fromthe original on 19 October 2015. Retrieved21 October 2015.
^"The Field Marshall reconnoitres Switzerland's No-Man's-Land once again: some striking aerial views of Mount Toedi taken by Lord Montgomery".Illustrated London News. 23 February 1957. pp. 298–9.
^James, Laura (2005). "Nasser and His Enemies: Foreign Policy Decision Making in Egypt on the Eve of the Six Day War". Herzliya, Israel: MERIA Journal.
^World War II in Europe: A Concise History, p. 168, by Marvin Perry, Cengage Learning, 2012,ISBN978-1285401799
^A World at Arms: A Global History of World War II, p. 1103, by Gerhard L. Weinberg, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2013,ISBN978-0511252938
^The Day of Battle: The War in Sicily and Italy, 1943–1944, Volume 2 of TheLiberation Trilogy, p, 126, by Rick Atkinson, Henry Holt and Company, 2007,ISBN978-1429920100
Badsey, Stephen (1990).Normandy 1944 Allied Landings and Breakout. London.ISBN978-0-85045-921-0.
Baxter, Colin (1999).Field Marshal Bernard Law Montgomery, 1887–1976: A Selected Bibliography. Greenwood Press.ISBN978-0-313-29119-7.
Bernage, Georges (2000).The Panzers and the Battle of Normandy, June 5th–July 20th, 1944. Editions Heimdal.ISBN978-2-84048-135-5.
Bierman, John; Smith, Colin (2002).Alamein: War Without Hate. Penguin Group.ISBN978-0-670-91109-7.
Buckley, J. (2014) [2013].Monty's Men: The British Army and the Liberation of Europe (pbk. ed.). London: Yale University Press.ISBN978-0-300-20534-3.
Brereton, Lewis (2011).The Brereton Diaries: The War in the Air in the Pacific, Middle East and Europe, 3 October 1941 – 8 May 1945. Morrow.ISBN978-1-258-20290-3.
Copp, Terry (Fall 1981). "'No Lack of Rational Speed': First Canadian Army Operations, September 1944".Journal of Canadian Studies.16 (3–4):145–155.doi:10.3138/jcs.16.3-4.145.S2CID151600903.
Copp, Terry (2004).Fields of Fire: The Canadians in Normandy. University of Toronto Press.
D'Este, Carlo (1983).Decision in Normandy: The Unwritten Story of Montgomery and the Allied Campaign. London: William Collins Sons.ISBN978-0-00-217056-7.
Mead, Richard (2007).Churchill's Lions: A biographical guide to the key British generals of World War II. Stroud, UK: Spellmount.ISBN978-1-86227-431-0.
Moorehead, Alan (1973).Montgomery. London: White Lion Publishers.ISBN978-0-85617-357-8.
Morelock, Jerry D (2015).Generals of the Bulge: Leadership in the U.S. Army's Greatest Battle. Stackpole Books.ISBN978-0811761758.
Neillands, Robin (2005).The Battle for the Rhine 1944. Overlook Press.ISBN978-1-59020-028-5.
Playfair, Major-General I.S.O.; Flynn, Captain F.C. (R.N.); Molony, Brigadier C.J.C. & Gleave, Group Captain T.P. (2004c) [1st. pub.HMSO:1960].Butler, Sir James (ed.).The Mediterranean and Middle East, Vol. III: British Fortunes reach their Lowest Ebb (September 1941 to September 1942). History of the Second World War, United Kingdom Military Series. Uckfield, UK: Naval & Military Press.ISBN978-1-84574-067-2.
Playfair, Major-General I.S.O.; Flynn, Captain F.C. (R.N.); Molony, Brigadier C.J.C. & Gleave, Group Captain T.P. (2004d) [1st. pub.HMSO:1966].Butler, Sir James (ed.).The Mediterranean and Middle East, Volume IV: The Destruction of the Axis Forces in Africa. History of the Second World War, United Kingdom Military Series. Uckfield, UK: Naval & Military Press.ISBN978-1-84574-068-9.
Powers, Stephen (July 1992).The Battle of Normandy: The Lingering Controversy. Vol. 56. The Journal of Military History.
Montgomery, Bernard Law (2000) [1972].A Concise History of Warfare. Wordsworth Military Library. Ware, Herts, UK: Wordsworth Editions.ISBN978-1-84022-223-4.
Montgomery, Bernard (2008). Brooks, Stephen (ed.).Montgomery and the Battle of Normandy: A Selection from the Diaries, Correspondence and Other Papers of Field Marshal the Viscount Montgomery of Alamein, January to August 1944. Army Records Society series, 27. Stroud, UK: Sutton Publishing.ISBN978-0-7509-5123-4.
Zetterling, Niklas (2000).Normandy 1944: German Military Organization, Combat Power and Organizational Effectiveness. Fedorowicz (J.J.), Canada.ISBN978-0-921991-56-4.
.jpg)
_in_France_1939-1940_O812.jpg)
_and_Bradley_(centre)_at_21st_Army_Group_HQ%2c_Normandy%2c_7_July_1944._B6551.jpg)
.jpg)
_BAR.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
