The term is derived from the town ofBayonne in southwesternFrance, where bayonets were supposedly first used byBasques in the 17th century.[2] From the early 17th to the early 20th century, it was aninfantry melee weapon used for bothoffensive anddefensivetactics, usually whencharging inmass formations (human wave attacks). In contemporary times, bayonets are considered a weapon of last resort, and are rarely used in combat, although they are still used for ceremonial purposes (e.g,military parades).
Depiction of a Chinese muzzle-loading musket with a plug bayonet attached from 1606. The weapon's instructional manual and specifications is shown above.
The termbayonette itself dates back to the 16th century, but it is not clear whether bayonets at the time were knives that could be fitted to the ends of firearms, or simply a type of knife. For example, Cotgrave's 1611Dictionarie describes the bayonet as "a kind of small flat pocket dagger, furnished with knives; or a great knife to hang at the girdle". Likewise,Pierre Borel wrote in 1655 that a kind of long-knife called abayonette was made inBayonne but does not give any further description.[3] There are some accounts that place the invention of the bayonet in either France or Germany as early as 1570.[4]
Depiction of an early 18th-centuryRussian infantryman installing a plug bayonet.
The first recorded instance of a bayonet proper is found in the Chinese military treatise,Binglu [zh] published in 1606. It was in the form of theSon-and-mother gun [zh], abreech-loading musket that was issued with a roughly 57.6 cm (22.7 in) long plug bayonet, giving it an overall length of 1.92 m (6 ft 4 in) with the bayonet attached. It was labelled as a "gun-blade" (simplified Chinese:铳刀;traditional Chinese:銃刀;pinyin:Chòngdāo) with it being described as a "short sword that can be inserted into the barrel and secured by twisting it slightly" that it is to be used "when the battle have depleted both gunpowder and bullets as well as fighting against bandits, when forces are closing into melee or encountering an ambush" and if one "cannot load the gun within the time it takes to cover two bu (3.2 meters) of ground they are to attach the bayonet and hold it like a spear".[5][6]
Early bayonets were of the "plug" type, where the bayonet was fitted directly into the barrel of the musket.[7][8][9] This allowed light infantry to be converted to heavy infantry and hold off cavalry charges. The bayonet had a round handle that slid directly into the musket barrel. This naturally prevented the gun from being fired. The first known mention of the use of bayonets in European warfare was in the memoirs of Jacques de Chastenet, Vicomte de Puységur.[10] He described the French using crude 1-foot (0.30 m) plug bayonets during theThirty Years' War (1618–1648).[10] However, it was not until 1671 that GeneralJean Martinet standardized and issued plug bayonets to the French regiment offusiliers then raised. They were issued to part of an Englishdragoon regiment raised in 1672, and to the Royal Fusiliers when raised in 1685.[11]
Socket of a bayonet, showing triangular cross-section and fluted sides
The major problem with plug bayonets was that when attached they made it impossible to fire the musket, requiring soldiers to wait until the last possible moment before amelee to fix the bayonet. The defeat of forces loyal toWilliam of Orange byJacobite Highlanders at theBattle of Killiecrankie in 1689 was due (among other things) to the use of the plug bayonet.[8][11] The Highlanders closed to 50 yd (46 m), fired a single volley, dropped their muskets, and using axes and swords quickly overwhelmed the loyalists before they had time to fix bayonets. Shortly thereafter, the defeated leader,Hugh Mackay, is believed to have introduced a socket bayonet of his own invention. Soon "socket" bayonets would incorporate both socket mounts and an offset blade that fit around the musket's barrel, which allowed the musket to be fired and reloaded while the bayonet was attached.
Early 19th-century offset spiked socket bayonet
An unsuccessful trial with socket or zigzag bayonets was made after theBattle of Fleurus in 1690, in the presence ofKing Louis XIV, who refused to adopt them, as they had a tendency to fall off the musket. Shortly after thePeace of Ryswick (1697), the English and Germans abolished thepike and introduced socket bayonets.[11] The British socket bayonet had a spike with a triangular cross-section rather than a flat blade, with a flat side towards the muzzle and two fluted sides outermost to a length of 15 inches (38 cm). It had no lock to keep it fast to the muzzle, and was well-documented for falling off in the heat of battle.[8]
By the mid-18th century, socket bayonets had been adopted by most European armies. In 1703, the French infantry adopted a spring-loaded locking system that prevented the bayonet from accidentally separating from the musket. A triangular blade was introduced around 1715 and was stronger than the previous single or double-edged model.[12]
The 18th century introduced the concept of thesword bayonet, a long-bladed weapon with a single- or double-edged blade that could also be used as ashortsword. Its initial purpose was to ensure that riflemen could form aninfantry square properly to fend off cavalry attacks when in ranks with musketmen, whose weapons were longer. A prime early example of a sword bayonet-fitted rifle is the Pattern 1800 Infantry Rifle, later known as the "Baker Rifle". Sword bayonets were used by German Jagers in the 18th century. The hilt usually hadquillons modified to accommodate thegun barrel and ahilt mechanism that enabled the bayonet to be attached to abayonet lug. A sword bayonet could be used in combat as asidearm, when detached from the musket or rifle. When the bayonet was attached to the musket or rifle, it effectively turned alllong guns into aspear orglaive, which made it suitable for both thrusting and cutting attacks.
Chassepot bolt-action rifle and sword bayonet.
While the British Army eventually discarded the sword bayonet, the socket bayonet survived the introduction of the rifled musket into British service in 1854. The new rifled musket copied the French locking ring system.[8] The new bayonet proved its worth at theBattle of Alma and theBattle of Inkerman during theCrimean War, where the Imperial Russian Army learned to fear it.[8]
In the 1860s, European nations began to develop newbolt-actionbreechloadingrifles (such as theChassepot andSnider–Enfield) and sword bayonets suitable for mass production and used by police, pioneer, and engineer troops.[13] The decision to redesign the bayonet into a short sword was viewed by some as an acknowledgement of the decline in importance of the fixed bayonet as a weapon in the face of new advances in firearms technology.[14] As a British newspaper put it, "the committee, in recommending this new sword bayonet, appear to have had in view the fact that bayonets will henceforth be less frequently used than in former times as a weapon of offence and defence; they desired, therefore, to substitute an instrument of more general utility."[14]
British Pattern 1875 Snider saw-backed bayonet (with scabbard) for the artillery carbine
One of these multipurpose designs was the 'sawback' bayonet, which incorporated saw teeth on the spine of the blade.[13] The sawback bayonet was intended for use as a general-purpose utility tool as well as a weapon; the teeth were meant to facilitate the cutting of wood for various defensive works such as barbed-wire posts, as well as for butchering livestock.[1][14][15][16] It was initially adopted by the German states in 1865; until the middle of WWI approximately 5% of every bayonet style was complemented with a sawback version, for example in Belgium in 1868, Great Britain in 1869 and Switzerland in 1878 (Switzerland introduced their last model in 1914).[1][14][15][16][17] The original sawback bayonets were typically of the heavy sword-type, they were issued to engineers, with to some extent the bayonet aspect being secondary to the "tool" aspect. Later German sawbacks were more of a rank indicator than a functional saw. Generally, an average of 6% of all bayonets were sawbacks for non-commissioned officers. There were some exceptions, such as the kurzes Seitengewehr 1898 model, all of which were of the sawback design and meant for what was considered more prestigious units, such as machine gunners, telegraph troop and colonial troops.[18] The sawback proved relatively ineffective as a cutting tool, and was soon outmoded by improvements in military logistics and transportation; most nations dropped the sawback feature by the early 20th century.[1] The German army discontinued use of the sawback bayonet in 1917 after protests that the serrated blade caused unnecessarily severe wounds when used as a fixed bayonet.[1][16]
Thetrowel orspade bayonet was another multipurpose design, intended for use both as an offensive weapon as well as adigging tool for excavating entrenchments.[19][20] In 1870, the US Army issued trowel bayonets to infantry regiments based on a design by Lieutenant-ColonelEdmund Rice, a US Army officer and Civil War veteran, which were manufactured by the Springfield Armory.[21] Besides its utility as both a fixed bayonet and a digging implement, the Rice trowel bayonet could be used to plaster log huts and stone chimneys for winter quarters; sharpened on one edge, it could cut tent poles and pins.[21] Ten thousand were eventually issued, and the design saw service during the1877 Nez Perce campaign.[22] Rice was given leave in 1877 to demonstrate his trowel bayonet to several nations in Europe.[22] One infantry officer recommended it to the exclusion of all other designs, noting that "the entrenching [sic] tools of an army rarely get up to the front until the exigency for their use has passed."[21] The Rice trowel bayonet was declared obsolete by the US Army in December 1881.[22]
Competitive bayonet team of "H" Company, 2nd Battalion,Lincolnshire Regiment, equipped with non-lethal dummy weapons, in theImperial fortress colony ofGibraltar in 1913German soldiers at bayonet practice in 1914Six sailors with Lee–Enfield rifles, standing in the 'On Guard' position during rifle and bayonet drill on board the battleshipHMS Rodney. October 1940.From 1899 to 1945, the Japanese used the very long, 15.75 inches (40 cm), Type 30 sword-bladed bayonet on the already longArisaka rifle.
Prior to World War I, bayonet doctrine was largely founded upon the concept of "reach"; that is, a soldier's theoretical ability, by use of an extremely long rifle and fixed bayonet, to stab an enemy soldier without having to approach within reach of his opponent's blade.[1][23][24] A combined length of rifle and bayonet longer than that of the enemy infantryman's rifle and attached bayonet, like the infantryman's pike of bygone days, was thought to impart a tactical advantage on the battlefield.[1][24][25][26]
In 1886, the French army introduced a 52-centimetre-long (20.5 in) quadrangularépée spike for the bayonet of theLebel Model 1886 rifle, theÉpée-Baïonnette Modèle 1886, resulting in a rifle and bayonet with an overall length of six feet (1.8 m). Germany responded by introducing a long sword bayonet for theModel 1898 Mauser rifle, which had a 29-inch barrel. The bayonet, theSeitengewehr 98, had a 50 cm (19.7-inch) blade.[25] With an overall length of 5 feet 9 inches (1.75 m), the German army's rifle/bayonet combination was second only to the French Lebel for overall 'reach'.[25]
After 1900, Switzerland, Britain, and the United States adopted rifles with barrel lengths shorter than that of a rifled musket, but longer than that of a carbine.[1][27] These were intended for general use by infantry and cavalry.[27] The "reach" of the new short rifles with attached bayonets was reduced.[1] Britain introduced theSMLE (Short, Magazine, Lee–Enfield), in 1904.[1][27] The German M1898 Mauser rifle and attached sword bayonet was 20 cm (eight inches) longer than the SMLE and its P1903 bayonet, which used a twelve-inch (30 cm) blade.[1][28] While the British P1903 and its similar predecessor, the P1888, was satisfactory in service, criticism soon arose regarding the shortened reach.[1][25][27][29] One military writer of the day warned: "The German soldier has eight inches the better of the argument over the British soldier when it comes to crossing bayonets, and the extra eight inches easily turns the battle in favour of the longer, if both men are of equal skill."[25]
In 1905, the German Army adopted a shortened 37-centimetre-long (14.5 in) bayonet, theSeitengewehr 98/05 for engineer and pioneer troops, and in 1908, a short rifle as well, theKarabiner Model 1898AZ, which was produced in limited quantities for the cavalry, artillery, and other specialist troops.[30] However, the long-barreled 98 Mauser rifle remained in service as the primary infantry small arm.[31] Moreover, German military authorities continued to promote the idea of outreaching one's opponent on the battlefield by means of a longer rifle/bayonet combination, a concept prominently featured in its infantry bayonet training doctrines.[26] These included thethrow point orextended thrust-and-lunge attack.[32] Using this tactic, the German soldier dropped into a half-crouch, with the rifle and fixed bayonet held close to the body.[32] In this position the soldier next propelled his rifle forward, then dropped the supporting hand while taking a step forward with the right foot, simultaneously thrusting out the right arm to full length with the extended rifle held in the grip of the right hand alone.[32] With a maximum 'kill zone' of some eleven feet, thethrow point bayonet attack gave an impressive increase in 'reach', and was later adopted by other military forces, including the U.S. Army.[32][33]
In response to criticism over the reduced reach of the SMLE rifle and bayonet, British ordnance authorities introduced the P1907 bayonet in 1908, which had an elongated blade of some seventeen inches to compensate for the reduced overall length of the SMLE rifle.[1][24][27][34][35] The 1907 bayonet was essentially a copy of the Japanese Type 30 bayonet, Britain having purchased a number of Japanese type 30 rifles for the Royal Navy during the preceding years.[36] U.S. authorities in turn adopted a long (16-in. blade) bayonet for theM1903 Springfield short rifle, theM1905 bayonet; later, along sword bayonet was also provided for theM1917 Enfield rifle.[29]
US military bayonets; from the top down, they are the M1905, the M1, M1905E1 Bowie Point Bayonet (a cut down version of the M1905), and the M4 Bayonet for the M1 Carbine.
The experience ofWorld War I reversed opinion on the value of long rifles and bayonets in typical infantry combat operations.[28][35][37][38] Whether in the close confines of trench warfare, night time raiding and patrolling, or attacking across open ground, soldiers of both sides soon recognized the inherent limitations of a long and ungainly rifle and bayonet when used as aclose-quarters battle weapon.[28][35][37][38] Once Allied soldiers had been trained to expect thethrow point orextended thrust-and-lunge attack, the method lost most of its tactical value on the World War I battlefield.[32] It required a strong arm and wrist, was very slow to recover if the initial thrust missed its mark, and was easily parried by a soldier who was trained to expect it, thus exposing the German soldier to a return thrust which he could not easily block or parry.[32][39][40] Instead of longer bayonets, infantry forces on both sides began experimenting with other weapons as auxiliary close-quarter arms, including thetrench knife,trench club,handgun,hand grenade, andentrenching tool.[37][41]
Soldiers soon began employing the bayonet as a knife as well as an attachment for the rifle, and bayonets were often shortened officially or unofficially to make them more versatile and easier to use as tools, or to maneuver in close quarters.[1][35][37][38] DuringWorld War II, bayonets were further shortened into knife-sized weapons in order to give them additional utility asfighting orutility knives.[1] The vast majority of modern bayonets introduced since World War II are of theknife bayonet type.[1]
The development of the bayonet from the 17th century onwards led to the bayonetcharge becoming the main infantry tactic throughout the 18th, 19th, and early 20th century. The British Army under Wolesley, the later Duke of Wellington, evolved its tactics to adopt the "Volley and Bayonet Charge" from the earlier "Highland Charge" tactic of Highland regiments under his command. These proto "fire and maneuver" tactics were first introduced to the British Army by the 42nd Highlanders (Black Watch) at Fontenoy in 1745 although, they had been used by their antecedents, (The Independent Highland Watch Companies) prior to that. As early as the 19th century, military scholars were already noting that most bayonet charges did not result inclose combat. Instead, one side usually fled before actual bayonet fighting ensued. The act of fixing bayonets has been held to be primarily connected to morale, the making of a clear signal to friend and foe of a willingness to kill at close quarters.[42]
The bayonet charge was above all a tool of shock. While charges were reasonably common in 18th and 19th century warfare, actual combat between formations with their bayonets was so rare as to be effectively nonexistent. Usually, a charge would only happen after a long exchange of gunfire, and one side would break and run before contact was actually made. Sir Charles Oman, nearing the end of his history of thePeninsular War (1807–1814) in which he had closely studied hundreds of battles and combats, only discovered a single example of, in his words, "one of the rarest things in the Peninsular War, a real hand-to-hand fight with the white weapon." Infantry melees were much more common in close country – towns, villages, earthworks and other terrain which reduced visibility to such ranges that hand-to-hand fighting was unavoidable. These melees, however, were not bayonet charges per se, as they were not executed or defended against by regular bodies of orderly infantry; rather, they were a chaotic series of individual combats where musket butts and fists were used alongside bayonets, swords, and polearms.[43]
The bayonet charge was a common tactic used during theNapoleonic wars. Despite its effectiveness, a bayonet charge did not necessarily cause substantial casualties through the use of the weapon itself. Detailed battle casualty lists from the 18th century showed that in many battles, less than 2% of all wounds treated were caused by bayonets.[44]Antoine-Henri Jomini, a celebrated military author who served in numerous armies during theNapoleonic period, stated that the majority of bayonet charges in the open resulted with one side fleeing before any contact was made. Combat with bayonets did occur, but mostly on a small scale when units of opposing sides encountered each other in a confined environment, such as during the storming of fortifications or during ambush skirmishes in broken terrain.[45] In an age of fire bymassed volley, when compared to random unseen bullets, the threat of the bayonet was much more tangible and immediate – guaranteed to lead to a personal gruesome conclusion if both sides persisted. All this encouraged men to flee before the lines met. Thus, the bayonet was an immensely useful weapon for capturing ground from the enemy, despite seldom actually being used to inflict wounds.
During theAmerican Civil War (1861–1865) the bayonet was found to be responsible for less than 1% of battlefield casualties,[46] a hallmark ofmodern warfare. The use of bayonet charges to force the enemy to retreat was very successful in numerous small unit engagements at short range in the American Civil War, as most troops would retreat when charged while reloading. Although such charges inflicted few casualties, they often decided short engagements, and tactical possession of important defensive ground features. Additionally, bayonet drill could be used to rally men temporarily unnerved by enemy fire.[47]
While the overallBattle of Gettysburg was won by the Union armies due to a combination of terrain and massed artillery fire, a decisive point on the second day of the battle hinged on a bayonet charge atLittle Round Top whenJoshua Lawrence Chamberlain's20th Maine Volunteer Infantry Regiment, running short of musket ammunition, charged downhill, surprising and capturing many of the surviving soldiers of the15th Alabama Infantry Regiment and other Confederate regiments. Other bayonet charges occurred at Gettysburg, such as that of the1st Minnesota Infantry Regiment. This was ordered in desperation byGeneral Hancock earlier on July 2 in order to delay a Confederate brigade's advance long enough to bring up reinforcements for the holed Union line on Cemetery Ridge. Still another bayonet charge was conducted late in the evening on July 2 by the137th New York Infantry Regiment defending the extreme right flank of the Union line on Culp's Hill. The charge of several companies managed to temporarily stall the advance of the10th Virginia Infantry Regiment long enough for the14th Brooklyn to move in on the 137th's right and repel the attack.
The popular image of World War I combat is of a wave of soldiers with bayonets fixed, "going over the top" and charging acrossno man's land into a hail of enemy fire. Although this was the standard method of fighting early in the war, it was rarely successful. British casualties on the first day of theBattle of the Somme were the worst in the history of the British army, with57,470 British casualties,19,240 of whom were killed.[48][49]
During World War I, no man's land was often hundreds of yards across.[50] The area was usually devastated by the warfare and riddled with craters from artillery and mortar shells, and sometimes contaminated bychemical weapons. Heavily defended bymachine guns,mortars,artillery, andriflemen on both sides, it was often covered withbarbed wire andland mines, and littered with the rotting corpses of those who were not able to make it across the sea of projectiles, explosions, and flames. A bayonet charge through no man's land often resulted in the total annihilation of entire battalions.
The advent of modern warfare in the 20th century made bayonet charges dubious affairs. During theSiege of Port Arthur (1904–1905), the Japanese used human wave attacks against Russian artillery and machine guns,[51] suffering massive casualties.[52][53]
Soldiers of the Imperial Japanese Army shout banzai
However, during theSecond Sino-Japanese War, the Japanese were able to use bayonet charges effectively against poorly organized and lightly armed Chinese troops."Banzai charges" became an accepted military tactic where Japanese forces were able torout larger Chinese forces routinely.[54]
In the early stages of thePacific War (1941–1945), a sudden bayonet charge could overwhelm unprepared enemy soldiers. Such charges became known to Allied forces as"Banzai charges" from the Japanese battle cry. By the end of the war, against well organized and heavily armed Allied forces, a banzai charge inflicted little damage but at high cost. They were sometimes conducted as a last resort by small groups of surviving soldiers when the main battle was already lost.
Some Japanese commanders, such as GeneralTadamichi Kuribayashi, recognized the futility and waste of such attacks and expressly forbade their men from carrying them out. Indeed, the Americans were surprised that the Japanese did not employ banzai charges at theBattle of Iwo Jima.[55]
The term "human wave attack" was often misused to describe the Chinese short attack[56]—a combination ofinfiltration and theshock tactics employed by thePeople's Liberation Army during theKorean War (1950–1953).[57] A typical Chinese short attack was carried out at night by sending a series of small five-manfireteams to attack the weakest point of an enemy's defenses.[57] The Chinese assault team would crawl undetected within grenade range, then launch surprise attacks with fixed bayonets against the defenders in order to breach the defenses by relying on maximum shock and confusion.[57]
If the initial shock failed to breach the defenses, additional fireteams would press on behind them and attack the same point until a breach was created.[57] Once penetration was achieved, the bulk of the Chinese forces would move into the enemy rear and attack from behind.[58] Due to primitive communication systems and tight political controls within the Chinese army, short attacks were often repeated until either the defenses were penetrated or the attackers were completely annihilated.[57]
This persistent attack pattern left a strong impression on UN forces that fought in Korea, giving birth to the description of "human wave".[59] The term "human wave" was later used by journalists and military officials to convey the image of the American soldiers being assaulted by overwhelming numbers of Chinese on a broad front, which is inaccurate when compared with the normal Chinese practice of sending successive series of small teams against a weak point in the line.[60] It was in fact rare for the Chinese to actually use densely concentrated infantry formations to absorb enemy firepower.[61]
One use the Germans in World War II made of bayonets was to search for people in hiding. One person hiding in a house in the Netherlands wrote: "The Germans made lots of noise as they came upstairs, and they stabbed their bayonets into the wall. Then what we'd always feared actually happened: A bayonet went through the thin wallpaper above the closet, exposing the three people who were hiding there. 'Raus!' cried the Germans. 'Out!'".[62]
On 23 October 1962, during theSino-Indian War, 20 Indian soldiers led byJoginder Singh fixed bayonets and charged a force of 200 Chinese soldiers. While the charge would prove futile for Singh and his men, it initially threw the Chinese off guard and forced a retreat despite outnumbering them 10 to 1.[citation needed]
In 2009, Lieutenant James Adamson of theRoyal Regiment of Scotland was awarded the Military Cross for a bayonet charge while in Afghanistan. Adamson had run out of ammunition so he immediately charged a Taliban fighter with his bayonet.[74] Lance Corporal Sean Jones of The Princess of Wales's Regiment was awarded the Military Cross for his role in a 2011 bayonet charge.[75][76]
Today, the bayonet is rarely used in one-to-one combat.[77][78][79] Despite its limitations, many modernassault rifles (includingbullpup designs) retain a bayonet lug and the bayonet is issued by many armies. The bayonet is used for controlling prisoners, or as a weapon of last resort.[77] In addition, some authorities have concluded that the bayonet serves as a useful training aid in buildingmorale and increasing desired aggressiveness in troops.[80][81]
Today's bayonets often double as multi-purpose utility knives, bottle openers or other tools. Issuing one modern multi-purpose bayonet/knife is also more cost effective than issuing separate specialty bayonets, and field/combat knives.
The originalAK-47 has an adequate but unremarkable bayonet. However, theAKM Type I bayonet (introduced in 1959) was an improvement of the original design.[82] It has a Bowie style (clip-point) blade with saw-teeth along the spine, and can be used as a multi-purpose survival knife and wire-cutter when combined with its steel scabbard.[82][83] TheAK-74 bayonet6Kh5 (introduced in 1983) represents a further refinement of the AKM bayonet. "It introduced a radical blade cross-section, that has a flat milled on one side near the edge and a corresponding flat milled on the opposite side near the false edge."[82] The blade has a new spear point and an improved one-piece moulded plastic grip, making it a more effective fighting knife.[82] It also has saw-teeth on the false edge and the usual hole for use as a wire-cutter.[82] The wire cutting versions of the AK bayonets each have an electrically insulated handle and an electrically insulated part of the scabbard, so it can be used to cut an electrified wire.
The AmericanM16 rifle used theM7 bayonet which is based on earlier designs such as theM4,M5 andM6 models, all of which are direct descendants of theM3 Fighting Knife and have a spear-point blade with a half sharpened secondary edge. The newerM9 has a clip-point blade with saw-teeth along the spine, and can be used as a multi-purpose knife and wire-cutter when combined with its scabbard. It can even be used by troops to cut their way free through the relatively thin metal skin of a crashed helicopter or airplane. The current USMCOKC-3S bayonet bears a resemblance to the Marines' iconicKa-Bar fighting knife with serrations near the handle.
The AK-47 was adopted by Communist China as theType 56 assault rifle and includes an integral folding spike bayonet, similar to the SKS rifle.[84] Some Type 56s may also use the AKM Type II bayonet.[84][85] The latest Chinese rifle, theQBZ-95, has a multi-purpose knife bayonet similar to the US M9.
TheFN FAL has two types of bayonet. The first is a traditional spear point bayonet. The second is the Type C socket bayonet introduced in the 1960s.[86] It has a hollow handle that fits over the muzzle and slots that lined up with those on the FALs 22 mm NATO-spec flash hider.[86] Its spear-type blade is offset to the side of the handle to allow the bullet to pass beside the blade.[86]
The current British L3A1 socket bayonet is based on theFN FAL Type C socket bayonet with a clip-point blade.[87] It has a hollow handle that fits over theSA80/L85 rifle's muzzle and slots that lined up with those on the flash eliminator. The blade is offset to the side of the handle to allow the bullet to pass beside the blade. It can also be used as a multi-purpose knife and wire-cutter when combined with its scabbard.[77] The scabbard also has a sharpening stone and folding saw blade.[77] The use of contemporary bayonets by the British army was noted during theAfghanistan war in 2004.[76] Traditionally, bayonets are instead called swords inThe Rifles.[88][89]
TheH&K G3 rifle uses two types of bayonets, both of which is mounted above the G3's rifle barrel.[90] The first is the standard G3 bayonet which has a blade similar to the AmericanM7 bayonet.[90] The second is an Eickhorn KCB-70 type multi-purpose knife bayonet, featuring a clip-point with saw-back, a wire-cutter scabbard and a distinctive squared handgrip.[90] For theH&K G36 there was little use of modifiedAKM type II knife bayonets from stocks of the former Nationale Volksarmee (National People's Army) of East Germany. The original muzzle-ring was cut away and a new, large diameter muzzle ring welded in place. The original leather belt hanger was replaced by a complex web and plastic belt hanger designed to fit the West German load bearing equipment.[91]
TheSteyr AUG uses two types of bayonet. The first and most common is an Eickhorn KCB-70 type multi-purpose bayonet with an M16 bayonet type interface. The second are theGlockFeldmesser 78 (Field Knife 78) and theFeldmesser 81 (Survival Knife 81), which can also be used as a bayonet, by engaging a socket in the pommel (covered by a plastic cap) into a bayonet adapter that can be fitted to the AUG rifle.[92][93][94] These bayonets are noteworthy, as they were meant to be used primarily as field or survival knives and use as a bayonet was a secondary consideration. They can also be used as throwing knives and have a built-inbottle opener in thecrossguard.[95][96]
The French use a more traditional spear point bayonet with the currentFAMAS bayonet which is nearly identical to that of theM1949/56 bayonet.[97] The new FrenchH&K 416F rifle uses the Eickhorn "SG 2000 WC-F", a multi-purpose combat knife/bayonet (similar to theKM2000) with a wire cutter.[98] It weighs 320 g (0.7 lb), is 30.0 cm (11.8 in) long with a half serrated 17.3 cm (6.8 in) blade for cutting through ropes.[98] The synthetic handle and sheath have electrical insulation that protects up to 10,000 volts. The sheath also has a diamond blade sharpener.
US Marine with OKC-3S attached to anM27 IAR in 2023. The USMC is one of only a few modern military forces to still teach bayonet fighting as part of basic training.
The push-twist motion of fastening the older type ofspike bayonet has given a name to:
The "bayonet mount" used for various types of quick fastenings, such ascamera lenses, also called a "bayonet connector" when used in electrical plugs.
Several connectors and contacts including the bayonet-fittinglight bulb that is common in the UK (as opposed to the continental European screw-fitting type).
One type of connector for foil and sabre weapons used in modern fencing competitions is referred to as a "bayonet" connector.
The bayonet has become a symbol ofmilitary power. The term "at the point of a bayonet" refers to using military force or action to accomplish, maintain, or defend something (cf.Bayonet Constitution). Undertaking a task "with fixed bayonets" has this connotation of no room for compromise and is a phrase used particularly in politics.
TheAustralian Army'Rising Sun' badge features a semicircle of bayonets. The Australian Army Infantry Combat Badge (ICB) takes the form of a vertically mounted Australian Army SLR (7.62mm self-loading rifle FN FAL) bayonet surrounded by an oval-shaped laurel wreath.[100]
The US ArmyCombat Action Badge, awarded to personnel who have come under fire since 2001 and who are not eligible for theCombat Infantryman Badge (due to the fact that only Infantry personnel may be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge), has a bayonet as its central motif. The shoulder sleeve insignia for the10th Mountain Division in the US Army features crossed bayonets. The US Army's173rd Airborne Brigade Combat Team's shoulder patch features a bayonet wrapped in a wing, symbolizing their airborne status. The brigade regularly deploys in task forces under the name "Bayonet".
The vocation tab collar insignia for theSingapore Armed Forces Infantry Formation utilizes two crossed bayonets. The bayonet is often used as a symbol of the Infantry in Singapore.
^abOwen, John Ivor Headon,Brassey's Infantry Weapons of the World: Infantry Weapons and Combat Aids in Current Use by the Regular and Reserve Forces of All Nations, Bonanza Press,ISBN978-0-517-24234-6 (1975), p. 265
^abKnight, Edward H.,Knight's American Mechanical Dictionary (Vol. 1), New York: J. B. Ford & Co. (1874), p. 252
^abcRhodes, Bill,An Introduction to Military Ethics: A Reference Handbook, ABC CLIO LLC,ISBN978-0-313-35046-7 (2009), pp. 13–14
^Foulkes, Charles J., and Hopkinson, Edward C.,Sword, Lance & Bayonet: A Record of the Arms of the British Army & Navy (2nd ed.), Edgware, Middlesex: Arms & Armour Press (1967) p. 113
^Carter, Anthony (2001).German Bayonets. Vol. 2. Norfolk, England: Tharston Press. pp. 55, 131.ISBN978-0946696086.
^Ripley, George, and Dana, Charles A.,The American Cyclopaedia: A Popular Dictionary of General Knowledge (Vol. II), New York: D. Appleton & Co. (1873), p. 409
^Board of Officers Assembled at St. Louis, Missouri, Schofield, J.M. (Maj. Gen.) President,Bayonets: Resume of the Proceedings of the Board, June 10, 1870, Ordnance Memoranda, Issue 11, United States Army Ordnance Dept., Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office (1870), p. 16
^abcBelknap, William W.,Trowel-Bayonet, Letter from the Secretary of War In Answer to a Resolution of the House of April 4, 1872, The Executive Documents of the House of Representatives, 42nd Congress, 2nd Session (1871–1872), Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office (1872), pp. 1–20
^abcMcChristian, Douglas C.,Uniforms, Arms, and Equipment: Weapons and Accouterments, University of Oklahoma Press,ISBN978-0-8061-3790-2 (2007), pp. 128–142
^Hutton, Alfred,Fixed Bayonets: A Complete System of Fence for the British Magazine Rifle, London: William Clowes & Sons (1890), pp. v, 125, 131–132
^abcBarrett, Ashley W., "Lessons to be Learned by Regimental Officers from the Russo-Japanese War", "Journal of the Military Service Institution of the United States", Volume 45, (March–April 1909), pp. 300–301.
^abcdeHopkins, Albert A.,Scientific American War Book: the Mechanism and Technique of Warfare, New York: Munn & Co. (1915) p. 141
^abPraktische Bajonett-Fechtschule: auf Grund der Bajonettir-Vorschrift für die Infanterie, Berlin: E. S. Mittler und Sohn (1889)
^abcdeSeton-Karr, Henry (Sir), "Rifle",Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.), New York: The Encyclopædia Britannica Co., Vol. 23 (Ref–Sai)(1911), p. 328
^abcPegler, Martin and Chappell, Mike,Tommy 1914–18 (Vol. 16), New York: Osprey Publishing Ltd.,ISBN978-1-85532-541-8 (1996), p. 16
^abTilson, John Q. (Hon.),Weapons of Aerial Warfare: Speech By Hon. John Q. Tilson, Delivered June 1, 1917, United States House of Representatives, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office (1918), p. 84
^Ezell, Edward C.,Small Arms of the World: A Basic Manual of Small Arms, Volume 11, p. 502
^abcdefCrossman, Edward C., "The Rifle of the Hun",Popular Mechanics, Vol. 30, No. 2 (1918), pp. 183–185.
^Stacey, Cromwell (Capt.), "Training in Bayonet Fighting: Throw Point",U.S. Infantry Journal, Vol. 10, No. 6 (1914) pp. 870–871.
^ Notes on Naval Progress, Section II: Small Arms, General Information Series Volume 20, United States Office of Naval Intelligence, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office (July 1901), p. 198
^abcdRegan, Paula (ed.),Weapon: A Visual History of Arms and Armor, London: Penguin Ltd.ISBN978-0-7566-4219-8 (2006), p. 284.
^abcdMcBride, Herbert W.,A Rifleman Went to War, Plantersville, SC: Small Arms Technical Publishing Co. (1935), pp. 179–185, 197, 241–243, 335
^abcKnyvett, R. Hugh (Capt.),Over There with the Australians, originally published 1918, reprinted by The Echo Library,ISBN978-1-4068-6694-0 (2011), pp. 152–153.
^Moss, James Alfred,Manual of Military Training, Menasha, WI: George Banta Publishing Co. (1914), p. 161: "The adversary may attempt a greater extension in the thrust and lunge by quitting the grasp of his piece with the left hand and advancing the right as far as possible. When this is done, a sharp parry may cause him to lose control of his rifle, leaving him exposed to a counter-attack, which should follow promptly."
^United States Marine Corps,U.S. Marine Combat Conditioning, United States Marine Corps Schools (Sep 1944), reprinted Skyhorse Publishing Inc.,ISBN978-1602399624 (2011), p. 7: "The...' throw point' as it is sometimes called can be used to thrust from a distance anunarmed enemy who is running backwards away from you. This would probably be the only time you would actually thrust a man with a...' throw point'...because unless your enemy is off his guard and unless you have a very strong arm, there is too much chance of dropping the rifle or of his knocking it from your hands."
^Beith, Ian H., "Modern Battle Tactics: Address Delivered April 9, 1917",National Service (June 1917), pp. 325, 328
^Hughes, Gordon; Jenkins, Barry; Buerlein, Robert A. (2006).Knives of War: An International Guide to Military Knives from World War I to the Present. Paladin Press. pp. 101–110.
^Olive, Ronaldo (12 September 2013)."Morre o projetista Nelmo Suzano".Plano Brazil (in Brazilian Portuguese).Archived from the original on 5 May 2019. Retrieved11 July 2021.
Alexander, Bevin R. (1986),Korea: The First War We Lost, New York: Hippocrene Books, Inc,ISBN978-0-87052-135-5
Appleman, Roy (1989),Disaster in Korea: The Chinese Confront MacArthur, College Station: Texas A and M University Military History Series, 11,ISBN978-1-60344-128-5
Appleman, Roy (1990),Escaping the Trap: The US Army X Corps in Northeast Korea, 1950, College Station: Texas A and M University Military History Series, 14,ISBN0-89096-395-9
Edmonds, J. E. (1993) [1932].Military Operations France and Belgium, 1916: Sir Douglas Haig's Command to the 1st July: Battle of the Somme. History of the Great War Based on Official Documents by Direction of the Historical Section of the Committee of Imperial Defence. Vol. I (Imperial War Museum & Battery Press ed.). London: Macmillan.ISBN0-89839-185-7.
.jpg)
.JPG)
.jpg)
.jpg)
![Brazilian LAPA FA-03.[99]](/mt/?noimg=&dark=on&url=http%3a%2f%2fen.wikipedia.org%2fwiki%2fFile%3aLAPA_FA_Mod_3.svg)
