Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Battle of Keresztes

Coordinates:47°49′31″N20°41′17″E / 47.8253°N 20.6881°E /47.8253; 20.6881
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
16th-century battle during the Long Turkish War

Battle of Keresztes
Part of theLong Turkish War

Mehmed III leading his troops at the battle of Keresztes, Ottoman miniature.
Date24–26 October 1596
Location
ResultOttoman victory[4]
Belligerents

Ottoman Empire[1]

Habsburg monarchy
Holy Roman Empire
Transylvania
Kingdom of Hungary
Kingdom of Bohemia
Papal States
Spain
Walloon and French mercenaries
Serbs
Cossacks
Polish cavalry[3]
Commanders and leaders
Maximilian III
Sigismund Báthory
Strength
80,000[5]–100,000 men
100 cannons

40,000;[5]–50,000; higher estimates of 100,000[6]
30–300 cannons[7][8]

  • 14,000 Austrians, Germans and Walloons[9]
  • 13,000 Hungarians
  • 10,000 Transylvanians
  • 3,000Reiters
  • 5,000 Bohemians[9]
  • Few hundred Cossacks and Poles
  • Few hundred Italians, French and Serbs[9]
Casualties and losses
20,000–30,000[10][a]

23,000–30,000+[5][14](Western sources)

50,000–60,000[15]
160 cannons
30,000 muskets
(Ottoman sources)
Central Europe–Balkans

Mediterranean

East Indies

TheBattle of Keresztes (also known as theBattle of Mezőkeresztes) (Turkish:Haçova Muharebesi) took place on 24–26 October 1596. It was fought between a combinedHabsburg-Transylvanian force and theOttoman Empire near the village ofMezőkeresztes (Turkish:Haçova) in modern-day northern Hungary. The Ottomans routed the Habsburg-led army, but due to their own losses, they were unable toexploit their victory.[5]

Background

[edit]

On 23 June 1596, theOttoman army marched fromConstantinopole. Commanded bySultanMehmed III, the army marched throughEdirne, Filibe (now known asPlovdiv),Sofia, andNiš to arrive atBelgrade on 9 August. On 20 August, the army crossed theRiver Sava by bridge and entered theAustrian territory of Srem. A war council was called at Slankamen Castle, and it was decided that they would begin asiege on the Hungarian fort of Eger (Erlau). The fort controlled the communication routes betweenHabsburgAustria andTransylvania, all of whom were in revolt against Ottomansuzerainty.

However, news soon arrived that the Austrians had besieged and succeeded in taking over the Castle ofHatvan and had brutally killed all the Ottomans housed there, including the women and children. The Ottoman army started a siege of the fort ofEger on 21 September 1596, and by 12 October the castle had capitulated. As retaliation for the Hatvan castle massacre, the defenders of the castle were all executed.

Not long after, Ottoman command received the report that a mixed army of Austrians and Transylvanians were advancing towards the Ottoman expeditionary force. A war council in the castle ofHatvan was conducted underGrand VizierDamat Ibrahim Pasha. It was decided that the Ottoman army should march out of Erlau castle so as to meet the Austrians at a suitable battle terrain. The Sultan thought that the Ottoman army should disengage and return to Constantinople; it was with great difficulty that he was persuaded to engage the enemy forces.[5][8][16] The Christian army had 10,000 Austrians, 4,000 Germans, 3,000reiters, 13,000 Hungarianlight cavalry and 10,000 Transylvanians, and additional troops from fifteen other European countries for a total of 55,000 men.[17]

Battle

[edit]

The Ottoman army marched through several passageways of marshy terrain and reachedHaçova (Turkish meaning: Plain of the Cross), exhausted after a long siege and a hard, long march. The two armies faced each other on the plains of Haçova (Hungarian:Mezőkeresztes). According to the report of the English diplomatEdward Barton, in very high numbers foughtCrimean Tatar auxiliary forces in the Ottoman army into the battle of Keresztes.[2][18]

The Austrian-Transylvanian army, under the joint command ofArchduke Maximillian III of Austria and PrinceSigismund Bathory of Transylvania, was in position in fortified trenches. When the Ottoman army attacked the Austrian trenches, theBattle of Haçova commenced and continued for two days, from 25 to 26 October 1596. Early firearms (cannons, muskets) were used extensively in the battle. The Austrians, being entrenched around the old ruined church, succeeded in driving back the Ottoman assaults with a barrage of fire frommuskets and 100 cannon.[5]

By the second day of battle the Ottoman army appeared to have been defeated. According to the 17th Century Ottoman historianİbrahim Peçevi:

The Christians broke through the Ottoman army, but the soldiers of Islam had not yet felt the defeat. Then, they started to plunder and taking of booty at the command headquarters of the Ottomans. Under a few flags, a large group of Christian soldiers attacked the tent where the chests of gold money of the Ottoman Exchequer were kept. They killed and otherwise eliminated the Janissary and household cavalry soldiers guarding the State Treasury. The Christian soldiers got on the Treasury chests of gold coin and put up their flags of cross over them and started to dance around them."[19]

Sultan Mehmet III (left) at the Battle of Haçova.Nadiri's Diwan, ca. 1605

Commander SultanMehmed III wanted to flee from the battlefield. However, first he asked for the opinion of his tutor, the high clericHoca Sadeddin Efendi, who told the Sultan that he should continue the battle till the end. Heeding this advice, Sultan Mehmed III ordered that the battle should continue.[19]

On the second day of the battle, the fighting intensified. Troops from the Austrian army had reached the Sultan's tent, which was surrounded by the viziers and the teachers at the Palace Pages School for protection. While some troops were trying to enter the Sultan's tent, the other Austrian army's soldiers disengaged, in search of booty and plunder instead of continuing the engagement. The Ottoman horse groomers, cooks, tent makers, and camel minders retaliated against the plunderers with whatever arms they could find, including cooks' spoons, blocks of wood, hammers for tent making, adzes, and axes for cutting wood. The Austrians were surprised and retreated in confusion. The cries of "the Christian enemy is fleeing" were heard by the Ottoman troops still fighting what seemed like a losing battle on the frontline. The boost of morale allowed them to recover the battle. With a major action from the Ottomanartillerycannons, the Ottoman forces started another attack on the Austrians across the front and the remaining Ottomancavalry outflanked the Austrian-Transylvanian army, routing them.[20][5]

A letter written by an OttomanKapi Agha who was present during the battle to his friend inIstanbul describes the battle as following:

"The brave men of that period,Çagalazade andHasan Pasha, having sought refuge in God against theinfidels, and the otheremirs, commanders, and valiant soldiers of Islam, drew their swords and plunged into the sea of the enemy, their cries forAllah ascending to the heavens.Deli Hızır Pasha and the other Ottoman emirs arrived, andFetih Giray Khan surrounded the unjust infidels from four sides. There was such an intense battle and struggle, a great battle, that it cannot be described or visualized. From the Army of fifty banners, of fifty-sixty thousand infidels, no one survived. His ExcellencyCerrah Muhammed Pasha rendered great service in guarding the imperial tent, the treasuries, and the ammunition. In short, on Thursday atKabakuşluk, the infidel enemy was put to rout, and God’s aid and victory fell to the armies of Islam. Thereafter, the Sultan—caliph upon the earth, may his sovereignty endure until the end of time—advanced with the soldiers of Islam, striking down the enemy infidels as far as the Fortress of Mudon. There, too, a fierce battle took place. The infidel enemy was put to rout, and one hundred and sixty cannons, thirty thousand muskets, fifty thousand arrows, and various other implements of war were seized. In addition, fifteen thousand tents and sixteen thousand cartloads of grain were destroyed; the remaining grain, which had previously cost three hundred and forty akçe per measure, fell to fifty."[21]

The author talks about the encirclement and destruction of the disorganized units of the Habsburg Army after its failed attack on the Ottoman main camp. In the same letter, the author also describes some of the Ottoman losses and aftermath as following:

"To sum up, the following shall be stated: 2Kapi Agha and 4Imrahor were wounded. 4Beylerbeyi, 16Sanjak Beys, and 400Çavuş of the Imperial Court were martyred. Since His Excellencyİbrahim Pasha did not witness combat and, having departed from the site of the munitions raid to theFortress of Eğri, returned only after the battle had concluded, he was dismissed from office at the instigation ofHoca Sadeddin Efendi. Moreover, the stipends of those who fled on the day of battle from the vile infidels, failed to present themselves at the muster, or, despite being ordered to attend to military duties, did not appear, were reassigned—both at the highest and the lowest rates—to those among thearıq oğlanları who served as comrades. In short, an allocation was made according to duties in such a manner that even those who ordinarily would have had no prospect of receiving a stipend were granted one."[21]

Aftermath

[edit]
The allegory of the battle of Mezőkeresztes, 1603–1604, byHans von Aachen.

Soon after victory, Mehmed III appointedCigalazade Yusuf Sinan Pasha as the new Grand Vizier. He sent an imperial victory proclamation toConstantinople giving the news of the conquering of Eger (Erlau) Castle and the victory at the Battle of Haçova (Keresztes). This reachedConstantinople in October and there were public celebrations and public meetings organized in the city. During these celebrations, four galleys full of state-procuredsugar fromEgypt arrived at theGolden Horn, which added "sweetness" to the news of a military victory.Mehmed III was awarded the epithet of 'Conqueror of Egri'.

The Sultan's army marched for a month, returning toConstantinople victorious. Mehmed III returned toConstantinople in November to a triumphal reception. His victory at Keresztes had turned him into a hero. The imperialOttoman army returned toConstantinople victorious and were greeted happily by the residents of Constantinople. With the army in place, a great victory procession and many accompanying spectacles were carried out. The poets of Constantinople wrote special works about the victory. In the streets and markets of the city, town-criers were sent to announce that the streets of the city would be decorated to celebrate the great victory.Mehmed III wanted to celebrate this victory with great splendour. The warehouses and stores were all decorated with 'valuable cloths'. This display of colour all across the city is described in a poem by the poet [Kemal]:

All the shops of the city became colored due to conqueror sultan's wishes
Each of which were decorated as if it were the kerchief of the sweetheart

After the Battle was over, a roll call of the Ottoman military was conducted and discovered that 30,000Sipahis were absent. They were later stripped of theirTimar ownership as punishment. These act of properties seizure caused those Sipahis to rebelled against the Ottoman government and contributed to the outbreak ofCelali rebellions. Karayazıcı, an Ottoman official, rose to become a leader among these rebels.[22]

Casualties

[edit]

The Christians lost 23,000 or over 30,000,[5][23] while the Ottomans suffered 20,000–30,000 casualties.[17][24][25][26]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^Henry Smith William,The Historians' History of the World p.439
  2. ^abVárkonyi R. 2001, p. 27.
  3. ^In the Long War few thousand Cossacks and Polish soldier were in the Austrian, Hungarian and Transylvanian army. Ervin Liptay,Military history of Hungary, Zrínyi Military Publisher, 1985.ISBN 963-326-337-9
  4. ^Kissling, Hans Joachim,The last great Muslim empires: history of the Muslim world, (Markus Weiner Publishing, 1969), 35.
  5. ^abcdefghTucker 2010, p. 547.
  6. ^TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi.
  7. ^Attila Weiszhár -Balázs Weiszhár : Csaták kislexikona(Small lexicon of the Battles), Maecenas Publisher 2000.ISBN 963-645-080-3
  8. ^abThe Encyclopaedia of Islam Vol 6 Mahk-Mid p. 1030
  9. ^abcJózsef Bánlaky."A döntő csata 1596 október 26.-án".mek.oszk.hu.
  10. ^Ágnes Várkonyi: Age of Reform's, 2004.(Megújulások kora), p.27. p(Hungarian)
  11. ^Esir, Doç Dr Hasan Ali (1 June 2008)."Eğri Kalesi'nin Fethi Ve Haçova Meydan Savaşı'nı Anlatan Fetih name Türünde Bir Mektup".Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi (in Turkish).17 (2):177–190.ISSN 1304-8899.
  12. ^Esir, Doç Dr Hasan Ali (1 June 2008)."Eğri Kalesi'nin Fethi Ve Haçova Meydan Savaşı'nı Anlatan Fetih name Türünde Bir Mektup".Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi (in Turkish).17 (2):177–190.ISSN 1304-8899.
  13. ^Esir, Doç Dr Hasan Ali (1 June 2008)."Eğri Kalesi'nin Fethi Ve Haçova Meydan Savaşı'nı Anlatan Fetih name Türünde Bir Mektup".Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi (in Turkish).17 (2):177–190.ISSN 1304-8899.
  14. ^Last-minute Turkish victory at Keresztes
  15. ^Esir, Doç Dr Hasan Ali (1 June 2008)."Eğri Kalesi'nin Fethi Ve Haçova Meydan Savaşı'nı Anlatan Fetih name Türünde Bir Mektup".Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi (in Turkish).17 (2):177–190.ISSN 1304-8899.
  16. ^S.J.Shaw(1976) p.185
  17. ^abClodfelter 2017, p. 27.
  18. ^Tamás M. Tarján."A mezőkeresztesi csata".rubicon.hu. Rubicon Online.
  19. ^abTranslated from Turkish. Reference: Peçevi Ibrahim Efendi (ed. Bekir Sıtkı Baykal),Peçevi Tarihi (History of Peçevi) Vol.II, Ankara:Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Yayınları 1999ISBN 975-17-1109-6 and also another edition Ibrahim Pecevi, (ed. Murat Uraz)Pecevi Tarihi (History of Peçevi) Vol.II, Istanbul:Nesriyat Yurdu, 1968-69
  20. ^The original history book of Mustafa Naima, in duplicated manuscript form, was calledRavzat el-huseyin fi hulusat ahbar el-hafikeyn (The garden of al-Husayn: Being the choicest of the news of the east and west). It was translated into English in 1733 and it was among the first books printed in Ottoman Turkish script. References here are from the modern new Turkish script edition: Mustafa Naima (ed. Zuhuri Danisman),Naima Tarihi VI Cilt, Istanbul:Zuhuri Danisman Yayinevi, 1967
  21. ^abEsir, Doç Dr Hasan Ali (1 June 2008)."Eğri Kalesi'nin Fethi Ve Haçova Meydan Savaşı'nı Anlatan Fetih name Türünde Bir Mektup".Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi (in Turkish).17 (2):177–190.ISSN 1304-8899.
  22. ^Akdağ 1963, p. 3. sfn error: no target: CITEREFAkdağ1963 (help)
  23. ^Last-minute Turkish victory at Keresztes
  24. ^Kohn,Dictionary of wars, 47.
  25. ^Attila Weiszhár-Balázs Weiszhár: Csaták kislexikona, Maecenas Könyvkiadó 2000.ISBN 963-645-080-3
  26. ^History of Hungary 1526-1686

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^4 Beylerbey[11]
    16 Sancak Bey[12]
    400 Çavuş[13]

References

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related toBattle of Mezőkeresztes.
  • Akdağ, Mustafa (1958)."1596 Sirasinda Osmanli Devletinin Umumî Durumu"(PDF).Ankara University Journal of the Faculty of Language, History and Geography.16 (1).Ankara University:53–107. Archived from the original on 28 February 2013. Retrieved1 August 2025.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)}
  • Clodfelter, M. (2017).Warfare and Armed Conflicts: A Statistical Encyclopedia of Casualty and Other Figures, 1492-2015 (4th ed.). Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland.ISBN 978-0786474707.
  • Tucker, Spencer C., ed. (2010). "October 24-26, 1596: Central Europe: Hungary: Battle of Kerestes".A Global Chronology of Conflict: From the Ancient World to the Modern Middle East. Vol. TWO: 1500-1774. ABC-CLIO.
  • George C. Kohn,Dictionary of wars, Infobase Publishing, 2007
  • [1]Archived 13 August 2009 at theWayback Machine Article in History Today, "Last-minute Turkish victory at Keresztes".
  • Battle of Mezőkeresztes (Hungarian)Archived 26 May 2007 at theWayback Machine
  • Sakaoglu, Necdet [1999],Bu Mulkun Sultanlari (Sultans of this realm), Constantinople:Oglak.ISBN 975-329-299-6. (Turkish)
  • Shaw, Stanford J. [1976]History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey: Vol.1 Empire of the Gazis, Cambridge University Press.ISBN 0-521-29163-1.
  • Várkonyi R., Ágnes (2001). Ambrus, Éva; Révai, Gábor (eds.).Megújulások kora. Budapest: Magyar Könyvklub.ISBN 963-547-070-3.
  • "HAÇOVA MEYDAN SAVAŞI".TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi (in Turkish).
Battles involving theOttoman Empire by era
Rise
(1299–1453)
Land battles
Naval battles
Classical Age
(1453–1550)
Land battles
Naval battles
Transformation
(1550–1700)
Land battles
Naval battles
Old Regime
(1700–1789)
Land battles
Naval battles
Modernization
(1789–1908)
Land battles
Naval battles
Ottoman victories are initalics.
Medieval
Serbian–Bulgarian
Serbian–Ottoman
Serbian–Byzantine
Other
Foreign rule
Habsburgs
Ottomans
Venice
Russia
19th century
Serbian Revolution
Ottoman
Other
20th century
Macedonian Struggle
Balkan Wars
World War I
Interwar
World War II
Croatian War
Bosnian War
Kosovo War
21st century
Peacekeeping
National
Other

47°49′31″N20°41′17″E / 47.8253°N 20.6881°E /47.8253; 20.6881

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Keresztes&oldid=1337735709"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp