 | This article includes a list ofgeneral references, butit lacks sufficient correspondinginline citations. Please help toimprove this article byintroducing more precise citations.(January 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
| Battle of Aliwal | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part of theFirst Anglo-Sikh War | |||||||
 Charge of the British 16th Lancers against SikhFauj-i-Ain infantry and artillery | |||||||
| |||||||
| Belligerents | |||||||
.svg) East India Company |  Sikh Empire | ||||||
| Commanders and leaders | |||||||
| SirHarry Smith | SardarRanjodh Singh Majithia | ||||||
| Strength | |||||||
| 12,000 30–32 guns[1][2] | 15,000[3] 69–70 guns[4][2] | ||||||
| Casualties and losses | |||||||
| 850[2] | 2,000[2] 67 guns[5] | ||||||
TheBattle of Aliwal was fought on 28 January 1846 between theBritish andSikh forces in northern India (nowPunjab, India).[6] The British were led by SirHarry Smith,[7] while the Sikhs were led byRanjodh Singh Majithia. Britain's victory in the battle is sometimes regarded as the turning point in theFirst Anglo-Sikh War.
The First Anglo-Sikh War began six years after the death ofRanjit Singh, who had established theSikh Empire in thePunjab. The Punjab became increasingly disordered, while the British increased their military forces on their border with the Punjab. Eventually, the increasingly turbulentSikh Khalsa Army was goaded into crossing theSutlej River and invading British territory, under leaders who were distrustful of their own troops.
On 21 December and 22 December 1845, the army of theBritish East India Company commanded by SirHugh Gough and the Governor-General of Bengal, SirHenry Hardinge, fought the bloodyBattle of Ferozeshah. The Sikh armies underVizier Lal Singh and Commander in Chief Tej Singh eventually retreated, but the British army was shaken by its heavy losses. They did not renew hostilities for some weeks, and Hardinge sought to relieve Gough of his command, blaming his tactics for the heavy casualties.
The Sikhs too were temporarily disheartened by the retreats ordered by their commanders. However, they were reinforced by troops who had not yet seen action and moved back across the Sutlej to occupy a bridgehead at Sobraon, while a detachment under Ranjodh Singh Majithia (sometimes transcribed as "Runjoor Singh"), with 7,000 men and 20 guns, crossed higher up the Sutlej to besiege the British-held fortress ofLudhiana and menace Gough's and Hardinge's supply lines. The British commanders detached a division under Sir Harry Smith to clear this threat to their rear.
On 16 January 1846, Smith recovered two outposts which the Sikhs had seized atFategarh andDharmkot. Although Runjodh Singh's irregular cavalry had raided over a wide area and set fire to part of the British cantonments at Ludhiana, his main body was advancing only slowly on Ludhiana.
Harry Smith first intended to attack Runjodh Singh's army atBuddowal. However, on learning of the Sikh strength, and receiving further orders from Gough, he instead force-marched his troops viaJagraon, collecting a British regiment there, to reach Ludhiana ahead of the Sikh main body. On 21 January, as he left Buddowal, the Sikh irregular cavalry (theGorchurras) continually attacked his rearguards. They captured most of Smith's baggage animals (mules, bullocks and elephants), and cut down any straggling troops. Nevertheless, Smith succeeded in reaching Ludhiana, with his troops exhausted. A brigade of troops fromDelhi, including twoGurkha battalions, reinforced him.
After resting his troops, Smith once again advanced to Buddowal. The Sikhs had withdrawn toAliwal on the Sutlej, awaiting reinforcements. On 28 January, Smith advanced against them, cautiously at first.
The Sikhs had occupied a position 4 miles (6.4 km) long, which ran along a ridge between the villages of Aliwal, on the Sutlej, and Bhundri. The Sutlej ran close to their rear for the entire length of their line, making it difficult for them to manoeuvre and also potentially disastrous if they were forced to retreat.
After the initial artillery salvoes, Smith determined that Aliwal was the Sikh weak point. He sent two of his four infantry brigades to capture the village, from where they couldenfilade the Sikh centre. They seized the village, and began pressing forwards to threaten the fords across the Sutlej.
As the Sikhs tried to swing back their left, pivoting on Bhundri, some of their cavalry presented a threat to the open British left flank. A British and Indian cavalry brigade, led by the16th Lancers, charged and dispersed them. The 16th Lancers then attacked a large body of Sikh infantry. These were battalions organised and trained in contemporary European fashion byNeapolitanmercenary,Paolo Di Avitabile. They formed square to establish a strong front against a cavalry charge, as most European armies did. Nevertheless, the 16th Lancers broke the square. Both forces suffered heavy casualties.
The infantry in the Sikh centre tried to defend anullah (dry stream bed), but were enfiladed and forced into the open by a Bengal infantry regiment and then cut down by fire from Smith's batteries of Bengal Horse Artillery.
.jpg)
Unlike most of the battles of both Anglo-Sikh Wars, when the Sikhs at Aliwal began to retreat, the retreat quickly turned into a disorderly rout. When the Sikh soldiers fled across the fords, they abandoned most of their guns, either on the river bank or in the fords, along with all baggage, tents and supplies. They lost 2,000 men and 67 guns.
Smith wrote afterwards:
I have gained one of the most glorious battles ever fought in India ... Never was victory more complete, and never was one fought under more happy circumstances, literally with the pomp of a field day; and right well did all behave.
Many commentators referred to Smith's victory as the "Battle without a mistake".[5] Except for the 16th Lancers, who lost 144 men out of about 300, few of Smith's units had heavy casualties.
30°56′43″N75°36′51″E / 30.9452°N 75.6142°E /30.9452; 75.6142